Indonesian Journal of Physics

(1)

ATOM INDONESIA JOURNAL

Author's Response toward Associate Editor's Report Article No. : #963

Title of Paper : Gamma Radiosynthesis of Colloidal Silver Nanoparticles Stabilized in ι-Carrageenan under Atmospheric Gases: A Surface Plasmon Resonance based Study

Comment on Descriptions

Criteria Evaluation Associate editor's evaluation

Author’s Response

Completely correct

Partly correct

not Correct

at all Comments

1. Originality of the article



Free of Plagiarism/Similarity

(max 20%)



^{Thank you}



New article/not yet Published (presented/ in proceeding max

30%)



^{Thank you}

2. Related to nuclear/atomic

science and technology



^{Thank you}

3. References Thank you



The number of references at least 10, at most 20 for nonreview papers; at least 26 for review papers.



Thank you



The use of recent references 80 % (maximum 5 years ago)



14 out of 32 (43 %) are more than 5 years

The references have been revised accordingly. The revised manuscript cites 30 references in which only six references (ref. no. 9, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 27) are published later than 5 years ago. These six references provides precise data and principle information which support our assumption mainly related to correlation of SPR spectra with size and behavior of AgNPs in solution and effect of radiation on natural polymer.

(2)



Type of the references (primarily, secondary etc.) 85

% from journals



^{Thank you}



DOI reference (traceable)



^{Thank you}



Reference style standard:

Elsevier numeric without title



^{Thank you}



When reference has more than 3 Authors, write only 3 names,

et al.



The bibliography have been revised accordingly.

When reference has more than 3 authors, only first three author name is written followed with “et al.”.



Article follows the Atom Indonesia template and

guidelines



^{Thank you}



Table (clear, without vertical

line)



^{Thank you}



Figure (clear, min 300 dpi)



^{Thank you}

 Is the Level of English

appropriate? *



^{Thank you}

Final recommendation:

1. Continue review process [ ] 2. Return to the Author [ ] 3. Reject [ ]

Comments:

Please revise references cited to be recently published/less than 5 years

Dear Editors,

Thank you for your useful comments on our manuscript. We have revised the manuscript accordingly, specifically on the use of up-to-date references and writing style of bibliography section.

We hope the revision has fulfills your demand.

Thank you .