Excerpt from, Report No. 96-363, Department of the Interior and Related Agencies Appropriation Bill, 1980, relating to the Smithsonian Institution.

18

Recently authonz-ed areas-continued

· c en Point... 2.500,()()() 2.500.000 ... .

ad~dl Fort Clearwater ...

I... ,()()()

9()(),()()() ... : .. _~ ...

1 ... .

addle ^{l·ork Salin} on... 6()(),()()0 6()(),()()() •••.••••••••.•••••••••••••

P e ^fie arq u ^{ett~e . . . . . . . . . .} . . . . . . . . . . . l , ^()(K), 000 1. ()()(). ()()() ...... .

Rogue ... I • • I • • I . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 30 . ()()() 30 . ()()() ... I I • • I . I I • • • • • • • • • • •

Saint ^Joe I o o I 1 I o I o oo oo I 0 I lo oo o o I 10 o o o o o o 10 I o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oo o o l. ^()(K) 1000 1 ,()()()I()()() ¹⁰ 0 0 I I 0 I I I I I l l I I I I I I I I I I I I

Skagit ...

I ... I...

^{1 '()(K). 000} },()()(). ()()() ...

I

Slippag,e _··· ·~······ ··· .. ··· ... - 3.500,()()() - 3,SOO,()(K)

Subtotal......... ^9.853.000

Recreation composites ... ... ... 10.000.000 Unobligate-d funds offset ....... . Total, Forest Service ... . 55.598.000

6.353.000 11.300,000 -10.000,000

- 3.500.000

+ 1.300.000 -10.000.000

21.953,000 - 33.645.000

The Committee recomrn~end an increa, e of $1,300,000 for

acquisition

of the Crescent Moon J{anch properties, ^I~ed I ock composite, ^Arizona.

'I hi ha been offset by reductions ^tolaling $33,645,000. No new funding is recormnend d for Alpine Lakes ^Wildern~e because prior·

year appropriations and pending land exchanges should be ufficienl

In

addition to $7,945,000 in program ^slippage reduction , the Committee h,as applied a general decrea, e of $10,000,000 to offset the large balance

of unobligated prior-year appropriation ,. 'I he Forest Service should eek Committee approval to reprograrn ^existing fund away from stalled acqui ition program and direct them to areas where they can be

obligated in fiscal 1980.

The Committee has not agreed to House-approved bill language

~concerning the availability of fiscal 1979 appropriations to the

Forest

Service for Lake Tahoe land acquisition. ^'rh~e funding, $12,500,000,,

was

provided to purchase two casino properties on the evada side of the lake.

lbese

purchase were conditioned on matching ^fun~ds from California and Nevada and adoption of zoning laws preventing ^any maJor new ^casin~o developments. The House provision would have freed

the funds for unrestricted Forest ^S~ervice land .acquisition elsewhere in the Lake Tahoe basin, but the Committee recommends keeping the

funds available for the casino propeny purchases for at least

a , nother

year so the two States will have more opponunity to meet the matching

an~d zoning requirements.

Fish and Wildlife Service. More than half the Fish

and

^Wildlife

Service acquisition funding has been ^denie,d in an effort

to reduce

unobligated balances of prior-year appropriations and

to

^require

more

extensive

review

of proposed new wildlife . refuges. Changes

are

displayed in the following table:

•

•

24

it~e ulphur prinp Flf ...•...

alley City ... .

App.,opri tion for the anadromou fish , incl ng

recomm ndcd 1.000.000 incr a for

triped

b o

^ry

h c b n included contingent upon en cbnent o ui

bl

u ori

legi ^lati~on to

extend

th prog~arn. Th~e ommitt c p

th

ro

coordinate the triped b pliog~aan with the tion I

i

heric ervicc and

^to

encour ge

^ta~

and local panicipation contemplated in

^{th~e pen~ding}

authorizing

bill.

(Definite,

Repayable Advance)

Appropriation. 1979 ... 10.()()(),()()()

~timate.

1980...

¹~0.()()(),()()()

liouse allowance ... ,.......................... lS,()()(),()(M)

Commiuee recommendation ........................... 8.400,()()()

The Committee recommends $8,400,000 as an advance appropriation

for

wetlands

acqui ition by the Fish and Wildlife

Service, reducing the budget reque

^t

by $1.600,000 and the House allowance by $6,600,000.

As di cussed under

thel.and

and Water Conservation Fund account.

tJ1c

Committee believes some

lower

priority

land

acquisition can

be

deferred

in this period of

fiscal constraint As

advance

funding

that

must be rcp , aid from

future

duck

starnp receipts, this reduction

has the effect of moderating an

acceleration

of wetlands acquisition. In addition to the recommended

advance,

an

estimated

$18,000,000 in current

^duck

staanp revenues will be available for the purchase of

migratory

waterfowl

habital

Within total funding

available

for wetlands acquisition,

the

Committee directs

that

not to exceed $8,000,000 be made available for

purchase of

the McFaddin Marsh in Texas.

No funds

should

be used for expansion of the

^Conboy

Lake

Refuge •

•

DBVRIOPMPN'...,.I' AND OPERATION OF RECREATION PACII,J'I1PS

(Indefinite, Special

^{Fund) ·}

Appropriation. 1979 ...•... ,... ... ... .. Sl.SO,()()() Estin18te, 1980 ...•... ... .. .. . ... ... .. . ... .. .. ...

m.()()()

House allowance . . . .. .. . .. . . .. . . . . . . .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . 2:()(). ()()()

Committee recomntenda.tion ... ,, . . . .. .. .. . .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . . .. . . .. . . . .. .. . . . .. . . .. . . . . 2:()(). ()()()

The Committee reco1mnends an

appropriation

of $200,000,

the

saane

as the

^budget

estirnate and the House allowance.

^Recrea~

· onal user

on selec~ed

are-as managed

by

the Fish

and Wildlife

Service provide

·the

soufte of

funding

for

^this

account. Revenues will be used

^to

support inc.,eased collections

ⁱⁿ

·new areas and support for expanded pubUc

rrereational use.

•

28

Cooperative

^{prograi,~Js. di}

u

^{d und r th}

propri

fi ^r I ri nd c p n • th ommitt r mm nd d lcti 8

crvic

funding to

1e

and

pri ^{t · i,} t

nee und

r

co pc

pliog~aln in f

or of con

olid ^ti~

11 in

H I . 'lb

mmitt

h

also r duccd lh I k

ti

e

I,

im

ttlcm

nt

ct ^Ji qu ^t

to

00.000

^needed

For ongoin

^lid

tion of ati

^1~

cti n un

section

^14(h) of

the act

ny

furtl1 r

^{tudic nd}

pi

nning flcl ^t d to

I ka land,

^un~der

ection

^d(2)

can be accommod ted ilh

^g

neml

pi nning

moneys.

Statutory _• ^or contractual aid.

A $200.000 increa e

ⁱ

recommend d for the Lowell Historic Preser ation Commi

^i~on, in

agreement

with

the Hou nd in respon e to a

^{d~cp rtm~cntal}

r quest.

¹ⁿⁱ

ill provide 400.000 for the Commis ion' opcrati' ng ex pen . e.

^A

250,000 reduction

in teacher

^h~ou

ing for the Grand Canyon Unified chool District

also

concurs in the House allowance.

1l1e Committee has approved an added $900,000 to provide Park Service maintenance support for three pri ate in,

titutions located

in Washington, D.C.

lney

are the Folgers hakespearc ibrary, the orcora11

Gallery

of Art, and the Arena tage. The

library and the

g

11ery are designated historic

^si~es

deemed to be eligible for such

as istance under the Historic Sites

^Act

of 1935. The CommittJee

recommend $300,000 in maintenance

^fu11~ding

for each

^through

cooperative agreements

with

the Park Service. It is the Committee's

intent that no funds be made availble to the Arena Stage,

^h~owever.

until such ^tim~e that ^it

might

be ^certified by the

Deparunent as

an

historic ite. 'fhis as istance

ⁱ

recommended in fiscal 1980 because of

the institutions' clear and immediate needs. Such assistance in

future

years

^sh~ould

be available only to

^th,e

extent specifically authorized by Congress in ubsequent legislation.

Ad1ninistrative

reductions.

^The

following decreases in administtative expenses, in

^agreem~ent

with the House, reflect a general tightening in fiscal

^{policy an~d}

help offset program increases.

Working capital fund transfer ... , ... , ... , ... ,... ... ... - $60,()()()

Public affairs ... , ... , .. ,... ... ... ... - SOO,()()() l...egislative affai:rs .... , ... ,... .. ... ... -136,()()()

Unall0<4ted 1979 reserve ... : ... ,... -1.()()(),()()()

Tr:ans~er, leave, and incentive

pay...

-1.376,()()()

Pay oosts ••...•...••.••••..••••••••.•..••••••••••.••••••..•.• ·-. • • • . . • . • . . • . . • . • . • . . . • . . . • • • . . . • • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . - SOO. ()()()

Travel ... ,. . . . - 640. ()()()

Recent criticism has been raised over

^th~e

Park Service practice of

assessing

concession~ers

to support a "Director's Reserve

Fund." The

fund has been used

^to

finance various functions and

en~ertainment that

are not regularly authorized or funded

with

public moneys. This has

been called a "slush

fun,d"

for the Direcror, and many

fund

expen~ditures

have been criticized as unwarranted and,

in

sotne

instances, not entirely proper. The Conunittee recognizes there are

certain

^{benefits ~o} be derived

from

^the

maintenance of a fund such as

this, so long as there are proper

^~eviews

to prevent abuses. Accordingly.

the

^Park

Service

^sh~ould

submit

^detailed

quarterly reports on

fund

expenditures to Office -of the

Sec~etary and to

the congressional

App~opriations

Com•1littees.

The

Conunittee will

expect ^to see fund

-

• ^..

•

•

53

School pro}«t

Shaktoolik. Alaska. design and construction ..... .

Fort Totten. N. Dak... construction, ....... ........ .

San Felipe, N. Mex.. design and ^construe·

Budgtl

est/matt

$2,104,000

5,789,000

tlon ... .,. ... • , ... ,.. 2,107.000 Turtle Mountain, ^{N. Oak.,,} design ...... ,.. .... . llavasupai, Ariz.. construction ... : ... . American Horse. S. Dak.. design and con-

•

Commllltt

recommtndallon Clttmtt

$2.104,000 ... . 14,812,000 + $9,023,000

2,107.000 ......... . 570.000 + 570,000 2,800J)()Q + 2,800,QOO

•

struction ... ,... ... 4,565,000 +4,565,000 Red Rock. Ariz .• design ........ , ... ,.... 150,000 + 150,000 Torreon. N. Mex .• design... .............. 200,000 + 200,000

St Stephens, Wyo., design and construction .... ,. .................... 4.200,000 + 4,200,000

With two exceptions, these recommended new projects adhere ^to the priority ranking system that has been developed to direct resources where they are most urgently needed. 'J'wo schools that are eligible for fundi11g on a priority basis Fort Hall, ldaJ1o, and Navajo Mountain, Utah have not been funded because planning is incomplete and no reliable cost estimates are available. ^Withi11 available funds, the Bureau is directed to complete planning for these facilities so that firtn design and constn1ction estimates will be available for the fiscal 1981 budget.

TI1e wide variance with House project allowances stems mainly from project planning reviews conducted subsequent to House action. These reviews revealed that many of the school projects, although justified on a needs basis, were poorly planned and 110t geared to reasonable pupil attendance projections. Accordingly, only design funds are recommended for some projects so that effective sizing and accurate cost estimates can be developed before actual construction is funded.

lhe Committee still has some questions over the reliability of project planning and design and directs that all projects be carefully reviewed by the Office of Construction Management to insure the facilities are attuned to educational needs.

1be Bureatt's failure to conduct proper planning reviews before submitting project estimates to the Appropriations Committees underscores the need for still more improvements in management of construction prograrns. The Departtnent should make certain there are

no more blunders of this magnitude in the future.

The increase for hatchery construction is for expansion of the Suquamish tribal hatchery in Washington State. ^The House provided an identical allowance under the Fish and Wildlife Service.

111e ^reduc~on in facilities improvement funding results from the Bureau's failure to obligate hardly any of the $4,972,000 appropriated for that prograrn ⁱⁿ fiscal 1979. Those funds will carry forward and be available along with the reduced allowance for fiscal 1980. The BIA completely revised its facility improvements prograrn for 1979 but did

not bring this to the Cotnmittee's attention until well into the fourth quarter. A brief review of the changed progratn only emphasized the

need for more revisions, and ^it was clear there was no system

for

relating improvements to actual facility needs. As discussed earlier, this prograrn also needs an overhaul. The BlA should work with the Office of Construction Management in developing more rational allocations

of

available funding for Committee review and approval.

•

o thtrodl i an I tion

compl

^t

cl

^{th mmi t th t}

c i ling m ^{n gcmen} pi ⁿ n

non ^ildcm~ . be

ommi

^{tc d n t an icip}

planning

^{fund ~}

r furth r dmini

^{tr i i}

for ildcm , oth r ^th n tho 14 ^~ ign

mm

i ni

f n n I

d fi r

fl

p di ^{i u} ly

It thu e pee

the

or

^t

crvice to p

for st plan

pr

scribed by

cction

6 f th tion

I o

^t

AcL

CONS'J*RUCI10 AND LA

Appropriation. 1979 ... ...•... ... ... ¹ Estimate. 1980 ......... .

Jrl()lJ~ !!llct~~c:«! ...•...•...•..••...•....••.•.......•.•.•...•••.•....••..•...•..•...

Committee liccommendalion ... .

1 Act)uaed for COinpuabllUty witb fllcal year ¹⁹¹⁰

r

• I

Tile

^Commit~ce

recommends an

appropriation of .458

000 increasing

^the

budget estimate

by

$72,020,000

^and

reducing

^th

allowance

^by

$16.365.000.

Allowances

are

^detail~ed

below:

~ •t• •

r~8CJJUe5 •••••••~•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

RoadS and ^trails:

Builld

atbrWJlt

$21.132.000 24,881,000 + 3,749,000

Direct road construction... 98.135.000 148,835,000 + 50,700.000

l~imber purchaser road construction ...... 207.275.000 226.075.000 + 18,800,000 Tr:ail construction ... 8,166.000 8,166,000 ... . Pollution abatcanent ... .,... _• 718.000 ... -718,()(1()

I..and acquisition ... ... 2.012.000 2.012.000 ... . Travel .... ,,,,, ... , ... , ... ,... ... - 511,000 - 511.()(1()

The allowance for facilities includes a reduction of $1,152,000 In

savings and

slippage

and an

increase of

$4,901,000 for

the following

projects:

u.,;~~ c:«>nstruc:ti()n......... ~.()()(),()()(t

Recreation imp~ovements. Monongahela NF, West V ....... 291.000

l.ake

^Kincaid recreation development.

Louisiana... .. ...

^1,510,000

Planning and design. ML Magazine recreation uea. Arkansas... 100.000

The increase for nursery construction, in support of an expanded reforestation

progta•tl,

includes $300,000 for Ashe Nursecy In

Mississippi. ·

In

view

of heavy

cost overruns on planned recreation improvements in the Angeles high country, the Cotrunittee is deferring any additional

appropriations

and recommends

that $1,152,000 already appropriated

be used oo offset fiscal 1980 increases in facility construction. The Forest

Service should review

^its

recreation development plans on a cost-benefit

basi, and scale down some of the more expensive proJects

that

are no

longer

^feasible.

ithin

^{available funds, the}

Forest Service should

allocate

$40, to con truct a picnic area and overlook

^{on t11e}

Highland Scenic Highway,

. est

v· . .

Increases recomtnended

ⁱⁿ

road construction are

primarily

in su

of the 12.2 billion boMd-foot tirnber est progra•n discussed

•

80

Coal.

In a

I

^{t ·arri} ing bud ct a1ncndm ^{n th}

dmi

p ^po d 22.000.000

in

^{di t I}

n

^fi

r

^th

.,e

^{t I i}

p ~ L ommitl bcli s thi ^·fundin i moli

pp

p

idcd under the

^al~

m

^ti

fu , I

production

ac

^oun

earlier. ·

The

oth~cr recorrunended ~eduction

in co

I p~ogra•tl' i

ppl

¹⁰

utilization nd upply cti iti • m ny of . hich ould h

dupllca

or e en conflicted

with

cffons cl e here

ⁱⁿ

the

D

panmcn

^any

of

the commcreialization tudi a

ociatcd

ith

direct coal

liqu

on.

for

c

^ampl~c.

ha e already be n or

will

soon b

conducted by

the ncrgy

^1~cchnol~ogy

Office.

AI

o, proposed

financial naly

e

^to

the utilization

of coal-oil

^mixture

eem unncce

^sary

ince

^major

i11du, tries ^an~d utiliti should be abl~c

to make

^th ir own

fuel pricing compari

ons

based on

infor1nation

a ailable from the demon ttadon

program

^{conduc~cd by}

the

^Division

of Fos il Energy.

More di turbing i the

incon

istency in

the Depa1 bnent'

low/medium Btu coal

gasification

programs. During the past year the Dcparuncnt concluded the near·tertn market outlook for low/medium Btu gas wa poor. and sub equently proposed rescinding $50,000,000 in the fos il energy account

for

construction of a low/medium

Btu fuel

industrial d

monstration. Meanwhile,

the Depanm~ent has

.,equested new funding in this energy

production

account to commercialize

low/medium

Btu

coal ga ification projects in

fiscal 1980,.

Given this

confused situation contract funding

^has

been

^held

to a minimum.

^The

Commit~ee

expects to find these problems resolved with evidence of some specific achievements before considering funding for fiscal 1981.

Naval petroleum reserves. The

Cllmmittce

recorrunends the fuU

budget estimate for the naval reserves and notes that an additional

$168,000,000 from funds appropriated previously to the President ue

aJ o expected

to

be

outlayed. l.,otal

fiscal 1980

outlays

are

estimated at

$236,000,000 as compared

with

$189,000,000 for fiscal 1979. Production from these reserves in California and

Wyoming

is expected «> generate

$1,130,000 in revenue& for the Federal 1 , reasury during the next year

alone.

Shale oil

^developm~ent

program.

The

increase

^recom,mended

for e

oil

developm~enl

provides an additional $4,000,000 for resource

asse ment of the

naval

shale reserves in Colorado and

Utah. The

expanded $6,000,000 etTon

wilf

conduct

^si~e

specific hydrologic and meteorologic monitoring as well , as develop certain production oriented

data

that can

^improv~e

the value of the Federal holdings and accelerate

the

future

production

of these reserves.

Th~e

Cotnmittee believes coJnmercial p.,oduction of oil from shale is only a few years away. However, much remains

^to

be done

^to

evaluate

an~d

mitigate environ•nental and socioeconomic impacts. Coordination

must also

be improved arnong Federal,

^{State, and}

local age11cies responsible for licensing and permitting the projects. The balance of the increase, $1,500,000, is .,ecom1nended

^to

augment these activities.

Oil an, d gas development. Although no net

^change

is recomrnended

for oil and gas developptent

^p~ojects,

$1,000,000 has been added

to

enhanced gas

^{Itrov~ery to fos~r}

resolution of issues which inhibit the

104

under the Hou e llo ance. The budget ^incrc c r in tat p

n r th

renO\', tion fundin 111 ^t v.• . ^{dropped frorn th rcc nt} fi ¹ 1979

uppl ~cn1~cnt .J appr<>pri tion

for

^lhc

ncY.•Iy

acquired ^{u cum f frican}

Art. ^{f'un~ding For m'~or 'impro em~ nlS} in ^th~ mu ^um building ha been ^{d~efcrrcd pen~ding} a detcr1nination on a ^{p nn} n nt location For ^th museum.

CONSTRUCriO

Appr:opriation. ^{197'9 ...}.. .•... ... ... 57S,()()()

8t imate. 1980... .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. . . . . . .. . .. . . .. . . . . . .. . .. . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . 21.100 ,(M)() I louse allowance............. ^2~.600.(M)() Commi ttcc rccom men dation . . . .. .. .. . ..... .... .. . . . . . .. . . . .. .. .. .. . .. .. . . .. .. .. .. . .. .. . . . . . . . ... .. .. . .. .. lO.BSO,(M)()

The Committee recommend ."'n appropriation ^of $10,850,000. a decrea, of $10,850,000 under the budge't estimate ^11d $9,750,000 below

t11e I ouse allowance.

lb~e S1nithsonian testified that it could obligate only $10.600,000 for constructing a mu .. ctrm support center in Silver I : ill. Md., during fiscal 1980. 1nc balance of $10,000,000 hould be budgeted for fiscal 1981.

An ^aUowancc of $250,000 is recommended f<>r initial design

of the

. o-calJcd South Quadrangle development on the mall. rfhis restores half

t11c $500,000 reque. t that ^was deleted by the l-lou c.

lne

development, adjacent to ^t11e cnstle building on Independence A ^venue, would

house

an t>riental arts center, possibly the Mu cum elf African Art, and

other

facilities. Current cost estimates range from $50,000,000 to $60,000,000, but ^Ot1ly $500,000 for design has ^bee11 authorized. 1 he Committee agree with the House that more preci e planning, including proposals for non- Federal financing, need to be accomplished before a

Federal

commiU11cnt is made. ll1e $250,000 allowance should enable

the

Smithsonian to offer ^fi11tt proposals for Committee consideration in

the

fiscal 1981 budget

•

NATIONAL GAIJ.PRY OF ART

SALARIES AND PXPENSBS

Appropriation. 1979 ......................... $19.041.000

Estimate. 1980 ... ...................... ............. 2:1.,511,000

House allowance .......... ,........................... 22.3ll.(M)()

Committee recommendation .... ... ... ... ... ........ ........... ... 21.978,(M)()

llle Committee recommends an appropriation of $21,978.000. a

feduction of $599,000 from the budget

estimate

and $333,000

below the

House allowance.

ACIIYUy

Care and utilization of an collection ... ..

Operation and n1aintenance of buildings ^and

grounds ... .

~otection ·Of buildings. gr:ounds. and con-

t~ents ... .

General adminisl ration ... .

Budget

estlmtJJt recu•,lelldatJDII a..,.

$7.329,000 $6.798,000 - SS31,000

8.897,000 8.829.000 -68,000

~.309.000

~042,000

~.:J~.ooo

... .. .

2.042.000 ...•...•...•..

5 ,000,000 l1all be a\ailabl .for a ^~ n to co r any

defi

^{u/1 Jror11}

lo " uar1 ''' rs

^{i sr1ed}

to

^{ji11 ''}

e

tl1 ^cotr tructlon of lter11ati'e fi1 Is p uctio11 faciliti s a ar1tlrori d by tht

Ji' d ral ^011- ucle r l~rJer R se n lr a11d l e' lop111 ''' Act of 1974, ^{a a111} rrded.· Pro\•ided. T:l1a1 the i11d bted11

s

^guarante d or corrlltJitted to be guaranteed ^{111rder tl1is} appropriation

hall nor

e ^{ceed tl1e} a ^r:egate of 1,500,000.000: a11d ^{(4) not to ceed} ,000,000 shall be al•ailablc for ^progra111 1natragement.

T~1is Act shall be ^dee111ed to satisf>

tile

¹¹ quirertJelJts

jor

Cotrgres ^io1ral appro al of ectiorrs ^{7(c) a11d} 19 of said ^Act with

resp ct to all) purchase COIJII1Jil11retJI, price guara11tee, or

loan

guara1ztee for wl1ich furtds app~opriated hereb)' are

utilized or

obligated

/·or the purpose of this approp~iation the ten,, "alternative fi1els" ,,zeans

gaseous, liquid.

or solid ^fu~els

and chemical

feedstocks deri,,ed

Jro1n

coal, shale, tar ^sa11ds, lignite, peat, bio11tass. solid

l''aste,

utzcon,,e,rtiollal 1rarur:al gas. ^a11d

other

,,,;nerals or organic tltaterials

other

tha1z

crude oil

or ^any derivative ther:eof.

Within ⁶⁰ daJ'S following enactment of this ^Act, the

Secretary

of Energy in ^his sole discretio1z sllall establish ^a1zd pu,blish final

criteria

for loans described

itz

this

account.

Under "Energy Conservation" on page 42:

· · d

^fu~

h

^r.

Th t oo.a 000 hall be a ailabl

/coho

0

rn

1

hem

r· ^t

s ^l • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1• • • • • 1e • • • • • • • • •

Adaini ^{trat VP}

Subtol ll ... ^~· ... .

atch1n~ r nttJ (ind finit•) . . . . . .. . . . .. . . .

Total, P tion 1 I .. ndo\llil •nt or ^th, _{rt ...} ~· • . . . .

•

. t ion 1 ^Hndo nt ·or th

s ^{1 t•f.}

Adminibtr

• e e • • • • • • • • e • • e It e • • te ~ I. . • I. . ^{e • • • • • 1e}

•xp~ .,, •·u . . . ^~· •••••

Sub ^{It O·t 1 ~. ~·} •.•.••••••••••••••••....•.•..••• ^~· ...

I tchin gt· nto (ind fin1tn) •••• .••.•••.•• ...•• , •••••••••

Tot 11 , _tionol EndOWJll nt for the llum nitics ••••

To ol , ^{t .•} on 1 Jo'ound ^t ion on th Arts nd th •

ll~um l l i ti •s ••••••••••••••• ~· •••••••••••••• ~· •• ~· •• ;

OOUMlSSlOI OF 1-'"IUE ^~JtTS

Sd ri. f')u nd "XI) •11s "'S . . . .. . . , ••• .••• .• • • • • • • • • •

AD 'l SURY COU Cll .. ⁰¹ UlSTORIC PRES&RVATlOt

S ¹¹ .l"i ^{•H _lld "'X 'llS"S} · • • • • • • • • ·•. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •. ,, '" ,, • •

~ ATIO' AL CAPITAL ^Pl,.~t.n: 1 G OOMMISSlO

nd ^,...,. p ⁿ ns c 8 " li • • • • • • • • • • • 1e • • • • • • II • • • • • e • te • • • •

nd _P ·ns ^{• • • le I. • • • • e • • • • • • • • • It I. • • • • • • • • • • I. I.}

JOlt T FBDERAL-S1'ATE LA D USE Pl.. lUG CO tMISSIO FOR ALAS.~

S 1 ^ri~

11 r1 nd xpc.n cs ••• ^1e . . . t • • If • • • 1e • • 1e I • • • • • • • I • • • • • I • •

,W'.1 d cqu ^{b t} 10n nd d v lope •nt fu d (borro ing

u t h ⁰ r i ^{t )W )} 18 • • • • • • ^{!II . . .} II I. . . . . . . . .. . ^{tf • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •}

Public d ' lope nt . ~· ••. •.•• . . . • . . . ~· ~· .•....•..•• ~· ~· ..

Tot 1, P

Corpor

v nue D v lope nt

tion . . . • . . . • • . ^~· ••••...•• •• ^~· . . .

• 0 ^{1 ~} 0 1000

t 7 7 1000

•

n

ct

97 1000 , 0 0

10, 00 ,00 107, 00 , 000

--~---~--- ---~--~-_, ___ ^_._

98 , l,85, ^ODD I 0 , 2i; , 000

J st. , ^{oo , oon}

lOO I JOO ~ OOO

10 , 800 1000

----~--^....

---

-~---.-.---

108 , 7 1 , 000

t oo .ooo ^{'9 , ODD .000}

---~----.-.--- ---~~---

-~5,231,000 1 50 ^I I 00 ' 000

a • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••awwa ^WMM.B

30t. , 500 , 000

263 , 000 271,000

1. 72 , 000

- . ···- .... .. -··· ..

20 , 000 10 , 000

. ... ---···

59t. , OOO ---

--- - -·--- ·-·-·

1,659 , 000

33,000 , 000 30,255 , 000

1 , 856,000

1 7 * 000 ^'I 000 20 ,11 0 , 000

--- ---

6f4 ^'I 91/t ^t 000

••• • ••••• ••• •••• •• ••u ••••

f

3

I

hem

t r f r th 1 ^{G (J} p lin·

T t l , t i t l · II , n•w bud t ( bl1c ti •• 1) utt1or!ty , r·l ^t d

Con 1 tin o1:

Appropr1Jtion ··· ~··· ~···· ~···

D•fin ^t ppropli tion •••..••..•..•.••.•.

Ind finit' pproprf tion •••.•.•••..•.•••.

R p prop ¹ i · ^t 1011 • • • • • • • ~· ~· . . . .

Oorruwin U l:: l1 ^{0 1•} 1 ^t Y • • • ^{It • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1e}