STUDENT’S PERCEPTION TOWARD THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ONLINE LEARNING IN
ENGLISH SUBJECT AT SMP NNEGERI 1 SELEMADEG
SKRIPSI
Diajukan kepada
Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
Untuk Memenuhi Salah Satu Persyaratan dalam Menyelesaikan Program Sarjana Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris
Oleh
I Putu Dika Adi Suantara NIM 1812021114
JURUSAN BAHASA ASING FAKULTAS BAHASA DAN SENI UNIVERSITAS PENDIDIKAN GANESHA
SINGARAJA 2022
vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKOWLEDGEMENT ... i
DEDICATIONS ... iii
ABSTRACT ... v
ABSTRAK ... vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS ... vii
LIST OF TABLES ... ix
LIST OF FIGURES ... xiii
LIST OF APPENDICES ... xiv
CHAPTER I ... 1
1.1 Research Background ... 1
1.2 Problem Identification ... 4
1.3 Research Questions ... 5
1.4 Research Limitation ... 5
1.5 Objective of The Study ... 5
1.6 Theoretical Significances: ... 5
1.7 Practical Significance: ... 6
1.8 Scope of Study ... 7
CHAPTER II ... 8
2.1 Theoretical Review ... 8
2.2 WhatsApp ... 12
2.3 Google Meet ... 13
1.4 Google Classroom ... 14
1.5 Synchronous Learning ... 15
1.6 Empirical Review ... 17
CHAPTER III ... 21
3.1 Research Design ... 21
3.2 Research Subject ... 21
viii
3.1 Data Collection Method ... 23
3.4 The Technique of Data Analysis ... 28
3.5 Data Analysis ... 32
3.6 Procedure ... 33
CHAPTER IV ... 34
4.1 Data Description ... 34
4.2 Discussion ... 91
4.3 Implication ... 104
CHAPTER V ... 105
5.1 Summary ... 105
5.2 Conclusion ... 106
5.3 Suggestion ... 106
REFERENCES ... 108 APPENDICES
ix
LIST OF TABLES
Table 3. 1 Number of Seventh Grade Students in SMP Negeri 1 Selemadeg
in Academic Year 2021/2022 ... 22
Table 3. 2 Questionnaire Blueprint of Students' Perception toward implementing Online learning in English by using WhatsApp ... 24
Table 3. 3 Questionnaire Blueprint of Students' Perception toward implementing Online learning in English using Google Meet ... 25
Table 3. 4 Questionnaire Blueprint of Students' Perception toward implementating Online learning in English using Google Classroom ... 27
Table 3. 5 Cross Tabulation ... 29
Table 3. 6 Level of Content Validity ... 29
Table 3. 7 Reliability Statistics of WhatsApp ... 31
Table 3. 8 Reliability Statistics of Google Meet ... 31
Table 3. 9 Reliability Statistics of Google Classroom ... 31
Table 3. 10 Qualification Reliability Coefficient ... 31
Table 3. 11 Guideline of Qualification Level ... 32
Table 3. 12 Research Procedures ... 33
Table 4. 1 Age Distribution of the Participants ... 34
Table 4. 2 Gender Distribution of the Participants ... 35
Table 4. 3 Participants' Experiences Using Gadgets ... 35
Table 4. 4 Descriptive Data of Participants’ Response Viewed based on the Dimension ... 38
Table 4. 5 Mean Score of Participants’ Response on Perceived Usefulness Dimension based on Qualification Level ... 39
Table 4. 6 Mean Score of Participants’ Response on Subjective Norm’s Items based on Qualification Level ... 40
x
Table 4. 7 Mean Score of Participants’ Response on Job Relevance’s Items based on Qualification Level... 41 Table 4. 8 Mean Score of Participants’ Response on Output Quality’s Items based on Qualification Level... 42 Table 4. 9 Mean Score of Participants’ Response on Result Demonstrability’s
Items based on Qualification Level... 43 Table 4. 10 Mean Score of Participants’ Response on Perceived Ease of Use
Dimension based on Qualification Level ... 44 Table 4. 11 Mean Score of Participants’ Response on Computer Self-Efficacy’s
Items based on Qualification Level... 45 Table 4. 12 Mean Score of Participants’ Response on Perception of External
Control’s Items based on Qualification Level ... 46 Table 4. 13 Mean Score of Participants’ Response on Computer Playfulness’
Items based on Qualification Level... 48 Table 4. 14 Mean Score of Participants’ Response on Computer Anxiety’s Items
based on Qualification Level ... 49 Table 4. 15 Mean Score of Participants’ Response on Perceived Enjoyment’s
Items based on Qualification Level... 50 Table 4. 16 Mean Score of Participants’ Response on Behavioral Intention
Dimension based on Qualification Level ... 51 Table 4. 17 Descriptive Data of Participants’ Response Viewed based on the
Dimension ... 54 Table 4. 18 Mean Score of Participants’ Response on Perceived Usefulness
Dimension based on Qualification Level ... 56 Table 4. 19 Mean Score of Participants’ Response on Subjective Norm’s Items
based on Qualification Level ... 57 Table 4. 20 Mean Score of Participants’ Response on Job Relevance’s Items based
on Qualification Level... 58
xi
Table 4. 21 Mean Score of Participants’ Response on Output Quality’s Items based on Qualification Level ... 60 Table 4. 22 Mean Score of Participants’ Response on Result Demonstrability’s
Items based on Qualification Level... 61 Table 4. 23 Mean Score of Participants’ Response on Perceived Ease of Use
Dimension based on Qualification Level ... 62 Table 4. 24 Mean Score of Participants’ Response on Computer Self-Efficacy’s
Items based on Qualification Level... 64 Table 4. 25 Mean Score of Participants’ Response on Perception of External
Control’s Items based on Qualification Level ... 65 Table 4. 26 Mean Score of Participants’ Response on Computer Playfulness’
Items based on Qualification Level... 66 Table 4. 27 Mean Score of Participants’ Response on Computer Anxiety’s Items
based on Qualification Level ... 68 Table 4. 28 Mean Score of Participants’ Response on Perceived Enjoyment’s
Items based on Qualification Level... 69 Table 4. 29 Mean Score of Participants’ Response on Behavioral Intention
Dimension based on Qualification Level ... 70 Table 4. 30 Descriptive Data of Participants’ Response Viewed based on the
Dimension ... 74 Table 4. 31 Mean Score of Participants’ Response on Perceived Usefulness
Dimension based on Qualification Level ... 75 Table 4. 32 Mean Score of Participants’ Response on Subjective Norm’s Items
based on Qualification Level ... 76 Table 4. 33 Mean Score of Participants’ Response on Job Relevance’s Items based
on Qualification Level... 77 Table 4. 34 Mean Score of Participants’ Response on Output Quality’s Items
based on Qualification Level ... 78
xii
Table 4. 35 Mean Score of Participants’ Response on Result Demonstrability’s Items based on Qualification Level... 79 Table 4. 36 Mean Score of Participants’ Response on Perceived Ease of Use
Dimension based on Qualification Level ... 80 Table 4. 37 Mean Score of Participants’ Response on Computer Self-Efficacy’s
Items based on Qualification Level... 81 Table 4. 38 Mean Score of Participants’ Response on Perception of External
Control’s Items based on Qualification Level ... 83 Table 4. 39 Mean Score of Participants’ Response on Computer Playfulness’
Items based on Qualification Level... 84 Table 4. 40 Mean Score of Participants’ Response on Computer Anxiety’s Items
based on Qualification Level ... 85 Table 4. 41 Mean Score of Participants’ Response on Perceived Enjoyment’s
Items based on Qualification Level... 86 Table 4. 42 Mean Score of Participants’ Response on Behavioral Intention
Dimension based on Qualification Level ... 87
xiii
LIST OF FIGURES
Diagram 4. 1 Participants’ Response on Perceived Usefulness Dimension based on Qualification level ... 52 Diagram 4. 2 Participants’ Response on Perceived Ease of Use Dimension based
on Qualification Level... 53 Diagram 4. 3 Participants’ Response on Perceived Usefulness Dimension based
on Qualification level ... 71 Diagram 4. 4 Participants’ Response on Perceived Ease of Use Dimension based
on Qualification Level... 73 Diagram 4. 5 Participants’ Response on Perceived Usefulness Dimension based
on Qualification level ... 88 Diagram 4. 6 Participants’ Response on Perceived Ease of Use Dimension based
on Qualification Level... 90
xiv
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix 1 The Questionnaire Student's Perception toward the Implementation of Online
Appendix 2 Content Validility
Appendix 3 Original Items on Technology Acceptance Model 3 (TAM3) Questionnaires
Appendix 4 Correlations
Appendix 5 Reliability of the Instrument
Appendix 6 SPSS Output for Student's Perception toward the Implementation of Online
Appendix 7 Riwayat Hidup
Appendix 8 Pernyataan Keaslian Penulis
