• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Operational assessment of Sarawak river

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "Operational assessment of Sarawak river"

Copied!
24
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)
(2)

Universiti Malaysia Sarawak Kota Samarahan

fk BORANG PEWERAHAN TESIS

Judul: OPERATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF SARAWAK RIVER BARRAGE AND FLOOD MONITORING SYSTEM

SESI PENGAJIAN: 2000 - 2001

Saya DIANA LUKE EMBAH

(HURUF BESAR)

mengaku membenarkan tesis ini disimpan di Pusat Khidmat Maklumat Akademik, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak dengan syarat-syarat kegunaan seperti berikut:

1. Hakmilik kertas projek adalah di bawah nama penulis melainkan penulisan sebagai projek bersama dan dibiayai oleh UNIMAS, hakmiliknya adalah kepunyaan UNIMAS.

2. Naskhah salinan di dalam bentuk kertas atau mikro hanya boleh dibuat dengan kebenaran bertulis daripada penulis.

3. Pusat Khidmat Maklumat Akademik, UNIMAS dibenarkan membuat salinan untuk pengajian mereka.

4. Kertas projek hanya boleh diterbitkan dengan kebenaran penulis. Bayaran royalti adalah mengikut kadar yang dipersetujui kelak.

5 . * Saya membenarkanltidak membenarkan Perpustakaan membuat salinan kertas projek ini sebagai bahan

pertukaran di antara institusi pengajian tinggi.

6 . ** Sila tandakan ( 3 )

T I

SULIT (Mengandungi maklumat yang berdarjah keselamatan atau kepentingan Malaysia seperti yang termaktub di dalam AKTA RAHSIA RASMI 1972).

TERHAD (Mengandungi maklumat TERHAD yang telah ditentukan oleh organisasil badan di mana penyelidikan dijalankan).

1

TIDAK TERHAD

Di hkan oleh

<

Wy1.t

(TANDATANGAN PENULIS) (TANDA ANGAN PENYELIA)

+-

Alamat tetap: NO. 297, JALAN CIRCULAR,

ASSOC. PROF. F.J. PUTUHENA 96000 SIBU, SARAWAK.

Tarikh:

&

vlnAfiCtt 9 0 Tarikh:

dr/ &4 O2W

C A T A T A N * Potong yang tidak berkenaan.

** Jika Kertas Projek ini S U L I T atau TERHAD, sila lampirkan surat daripada pihak berkuasal organisasi berkenaan dengan menyertakan sekali tempoh kertas projek. I n i perlu dikelaskan sebagai S U L I T atau TERHAD.

(3)

APPROVAL SHEET

This final year project attached here;

Title : The Operational Assessment of Sarawak River Barrage and Flood Monitoring System

Author's Name : Diana Luke Embah Matric Number : 5275

Has been read and approved by;

Associate Professor F.J. Putuhena (Supervisor)

Date

(4)

OPERATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF SARAWAK RIVER BARRAGE AND FLOOD MONITORING SYSTEM

DIANA LUKE EMBAH

This project is submitted in partial fulfillment of

the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science with Honours (Civil Engineering)

Faculty of Engineering

UNIVERSITY MALAYSIA SARAWAK 2004

(5)

To Daddy, Mummy, Family, Chris and Friends.

(6)

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I would like to thanks Associate Professor F.J. Putuhena for his guidance and support in completing this thesis. I also want to express my appreciation to Captain Goh and all Sarawak River Barrage staff for their help. Not excepted to Mr. Teo Swee Hun, the Senior Assistant Controller of Sarawak River Board for allowed me to make a research in Sarawak River Barrage. My pleasure also goes to Sarawak D.1.D for the information given. Not forgotten to my family, friends and especially Chris for their support. Thank you very much.

(7)

ABSTRACT

Flood is a hazardous phenomenon that often occurred in Kuching, Sarawak. Sarawak River Barrage was built in Sejingkat as a flood control measurement. Operation of the barrage is started with the data transferring by telemetric system from 6 remote stations all around Sarawak River Catchment as a flood warning to the barrage controller. Flood Monitoring System using NAM and MIKE1 1 Model is provided for the Flood Warning in operating the barrage. In the mean time, the actual operation of the gate is based on the reading of the upstream and downstream water level. In the event of heavy rain at catchment area, the barrage gates are opened during the down tide to drained the water from upriver to the sea.

When the down tide has reached its lowest (before the tide turns in) the barrage gates will be closed to form a reservoir of low level water, creating a suction effect to draw excess water from upriver faster. The operation of Sarawak River Barrage is assessed based on February 2003 flood which is one of the major floods that ever occurred in Kuching, Sarawak. Synthetic Unit Hydrograph and storm data is used to determine a flood hydrograph for running the flood routing. As a final result, Qpeak of the flood hydrograph is 3210m3/s. In routing this high flood, the barrage operator has to open h l l y all the gate and let the water level determined by the sea water level. Therefore, for a flood as high as the flood in February 2003, the barrage cannot effectively control it.

(8)

ABSTRAK

Banjir merupakan satu fenomena yang selalu berlaku di Kuchng, Sarawak. Sarawak baraj telah dibina di Sejingkat sebagai usaha untuk mengawal banjir. Operasi baraj bermula dengan penghantaran data hujan dari 6 telemetri stesyen di sekitar kawasan tadahan hujan bagi Sungai Sarawak sebagai satu amaran hujan kepada penguatkuasa baraj. Sistem kawalan banjir dengan menggunakan model NAM dan MIKE11 telah disediakan di Sarawak Baraj sebagai satu system amaran dalam operasi baraj.Namun begitu, buat masa ini, operasi pintu baraj masih bergantung kepada bacaan paras air dari hulu dan air laut.

Apabila hujan lebat turun di kawasan tadahan hujan semasa air laut surut, pintu baraj akan dibuka untuk mengalirkan air dari hulu ke laut. Apabila air laut mula pasang, pintu baraj akan ditutup untuk mencipta tasik sementara yang mempunyai paras air yang rendah bagi menhasilkan kesan sedutan supaya air dari hulu dapat dialirkan dengan lebih cepat.

Penilaian operasi baraj dibuat berdasarkan fenomena banjir yang berlaku pada bulan Febuari 2003 yang merupakan salah satu banjir terburuk yang pernah berlaku di Kuching, Sarawak.Unit Hidrograf Synthetic dan data hujan diperlukan untuk mencari Hydrograf Banjir dan seterunya untuk menghasilkan Routing Banjir. Qmax bagi Hidrograf Banjir adalah 3210m3/s. Dalam routing untuk banjir sebesar ini, kesemua pintu baraj hams dibuka dan paras air sungai adalah mengikut paras air laut. Oleh itu, untuk banjir seperti Febuari 2003, pihak baraj tidak dapat mengawal nya dengan effisien.

(9)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction

1.1 Flood in Sarawak River 1.1.1 Flood Definition 1.1.2 Sarawak River

1.1.3 Flood Events In Sarawak 1.1.3.1 Flood Year 1963 1.1.3.2 Flood Year 2003

1.2 Sarawak River Barrage

1.2.1 The Purposes And Construction Of The Barrage

1.2.2 Flood Monitoring System 1.2.2.1 NAM and MIKE 1 1

Flood Forecasting Model 1.2.2.2 Telemetric Stations

1.2.2.3 Operation Rule For Flood Control

Page

1.3 Problem Areas and Objectives

(10)

CONTENTS Chapter 2 Literature Review

2.1 Telemetry

2.2 Flood Control By Reservoir

2.2.1 Flood Control Storage Capacity 2.2.2 Flood Routing Through Reservoir

2.3 River Flood Hydrograph 2.3.1 Synthetic Unit Hydrograph 2.3.2 Storm Characteristics 2.3.3 Flood Hydrograph

2.3.4 Derivation of The Spatially Distributed

. Hydrograph

2.3.5 Catchment Area and Peak Flow Relationship

2.4 Gate Operation

2.5 Radial Gates

2.6 Flow Under Gates

Pages

2.7 Tides

vii

(11)

CONTENTS Chapter 3 Methodology

3.1 Background 3.2 Procedures

Chapter 4 Data and Analysis 4.1 Hydrological Data

4.1.1 Sarawak River Characteristic

4.1.2 Storm Data at Sarawak River During the February 2003 Flood

4.1.3 Water Level During The Storm

Pages

4.2 Synthetic Unit Hydrograph for Sarawak River

4.2.1 Lag Time 39

4.2.2 Approximate Dimensionless Unit Hydrograph 40

4.2.3 Synthetic Unit Hydrograph 40

4.3 Flood Hydrograph

4.3.1 Two (2) Hours Storm Data 4.3.2 Net Rainfall

4.3.3 Multiplication of Unit Hydrograph and Net Rainfall

4.3.4 Flood Hydrograph

(12)

CONTENTS 4.4 Flood Routing

4.4.1 Stage and Storage Relationship 4.4.2 Inflow Hydrograph

4.4.3 Gate Operation of the Barrage

Chapter 5 Discussion

5.1 Flood Hydrograph 5.2 Barrage Operation 5.3 Flood Routing 5.4 Telemetry

Chapter 6 Conclusion and Recommendation 6.1 Conclusion

6.2 Recommendation

Pages

References

(13)

LIST OF APPENDIX

Appendix A Storm Data at Sarawak River

Appendix B Water Level Observation February 2003 Appendix C Dimensionless Unit Hydrograph Data Appendix D Unit Hydrograph Computation Appendix E Rainfall Data For Every 2 Hours

Appendix F Multiplication Table Of Flood Hydrograph

(14)

Tables Table 1

Table 2

Table 3 Table 4

Table 5 Table 6 Table 7

LIST OF TABLES

Comparison Between Year 1963 and 2004 Flood

Scale characteristics of some precipitation events

Synthetic Unit Hydrograph Computation Relationships between stage, volume and outflow

Unit Hydrograph Derivation Computation The Result of Multiplication

Stage and Storage Relationship

Pages

(15)

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 8

Figure 9 Figure 10 Figure 11 Figure 12 Figure 13

Chart 1 Chart 2 Chart 3

Sarawak River Basin Sarawak River Catchment Hydrologic Routing

Flood Routing-General Principles Reservoir Routing

Synthetic Unit Hydrograph Effect of Storm

Maximum Observed Flood Peak in Indonesia

Radial gate

Notations for flow under gates

Discharge coefficient for flow under gates Sarawak River Catchment

Maximum Observed Flood Peaks in Indonesia

Rainfall Data of Kampung Bengoh Rainfall Data of Kampung Skio Rainfall Data of Karnpung Blinblim

Pages

(16)

Figure

Chart 4 Rainfall Data of Kampung Bogag Chart 5 Rainfall Data for Karnpung Siburuh Chart 6 Average Rainfall

Graph 1 Dimensionless Unit Hydrograph Graph 2 Two Hours Unit Hydrograph Graph 3 Flood Hydrograph

Pages 3 8 39

43 40 42 46

(17)

NOTATION

m m

-

millimetre

m

-

metre

km

-

kilometre

m3/s

-

cubic metre per second kNm

-

kilo Newton metre ft

-

feet

mi - mile

(18)

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Flood in Sarawak River

1.1. I Flood Definition

Generally, flood is a hazardous phenomena from perspective of economic and population. A common meaning of flood in our community is the extremely increases of water level caused by heavy rain. Heavy and long hour rain brings such a warning to our community. Flood can be classified in 3 stages, which are major flooding, moderate flooding and minor flooding.

a) Majorflooding

This causes inundation of large areas, isolating towns and cities. Major disruptions occur to road and rail links. Evacuation of many houses and business

(19)

premises may be required. In rural areas widespread flooding of farmland is likely.

b) Moderate flooding

This causes the inundation of low lying areas requiring the removal ot stock and the evacuation of some houses. Main traffic bridges may be submerge by floodwaters.

C ) Minor flooding

This causes inconvenience such as closing of minor roads and the submergence of low level bridges, inconvenience to public river necessary.

1.1.2 Sarawak River

I I

Figure 1 Sarawak River Basin

(20)

z

U JJ

EZP I

I P aW 1 W J , Ju aY 3W 3

DA

ye !~

~e ns arns!,g

(21)

1.1.3 Flood Events in Sarawak

1.1.3.1 Flood Year 1963

Many parts of Sarawak experienced the most severe floods in recorded history during January and February 1963. During this period, the state experienced rainfall in amounts far greater than the normally high total for this time, and this was the major cause of the flooding. The long duration of continuous rainfall and their high intensity contributed significantly to the seriousrless of the flood situation. Another important factor influencing the flood levels was the occurrence of 'king' tides during the period of excessive rainfall. About 80% of rainfall stations in Kuching recorded rainfall of more than 2,000 rnrn within January

-

February (i.e. about 50% of total yearly rainfall).

Kuching area flooding for 5-1 0 days duration. Flood height at Sarawak River is about 1

-

7 meters.

Table 1 Comparison Between Year 1963 and 2004 Flood Station

Matang Saberkas Batu Kitang Airport Skio

BadSeniawan Total Rainfall

Rainfall 1963 (mm) 1000

774 78 1 1078 1059 1118 5810

Rainfall 2004 (mm) 1142

762 1222 1082 1563 1665 7436

(22)

1.1.3.2 Flood Year 2003

The latest flood in 3 February 2003 is more likely a 100-year flooding. Rain pouring had happened several days until the peak is at 3" February 2003. Unpredicted, the rainfall report during that day is 80mm in 15 minutes. High tide plus heavy rain make the flood event worst. During high tide, the gates are closed to prevent the ocean water from backing up the Sarawak River estuary. The excessive water cannot be drowning to the downstream until down tide and the gates are opened. All low-lying areas are flooded in two to three days.

1.2 Sarawak River Barrage

1.2.1 The Purposes and Construction of the Barrage

The major flood in 1963, inspired the implementation of the Sarawak River regulation scheme. The 1963's flood caused a major damage to the town. To decrease the risk of coming flood (to defend Kuching from major flood), Sarawak Government had implemented the flood mitigation measure (Sarawak River Regulation Scheme) which was constructed in 1995. The barrage has been constructed on the Sarawak River at Kuching Port. The barrage is equipped with telemetry system as an early warning device for the barrage operator. Besides, flood mitigation, Sarawak River Barrage also used as water storage facility and irrigation purpose.

(23)

Sarawak River Barrage actually consists of 3 components which are:

a) A barrage of 5 steel hydraulically operated radial gates which are 25m wide by 12m high each.

b) A 1360m long by 25m wide ship lock, located at one side of the barrage.

c) 435m long four lane road bridge over both barrage and lock.

1.2.2 Flood Monitoring System

1.2.2.1 NAM and MIKE 11 Flood Forecasting Model

NAM & MIKE1 1 FF model are used to estimate the catchment runoff for Sarawak River catchment. The rainfall-runoff module (NAM) is a key element in setting up a MIKE1 1 simulation. NAM is a lumped and conceptual rainfall-runoff model simulating overland flow, interflow and base flow.

A MIKE 11 model of the Sarawak River was established to assess the impact of the planned barrage, taking into consideration floods, sedimentation and water quality aspects. It was concluded that safe operation of the barrage would require a forecasting system.

In parallel with the barrage construction, a telemetry network was established. The MIKE 11 model was expanded and refined to provide forecasts of flow and water levels along the river. The MIKE 11 package was customized to interact directly with a

(24)

CITECT SCADA system which automatically transmit rainfall level data every15 minutes.

The automatic procedure includes: transfer and access of telemetry data; automatic prediction of water levels at the lower, tidal boundary from recent measurements and tide tables (Sarawak Hourly Tide published by Marine Department); MIKE 1 1 FF forecast simulation; recommendations for gate operations; data transfer from MIKE 1 1 result files to the SCADA system.

1.2.2.2 Telemetric Stations

Telemetry is used to assist the operation in Sarawak River Barrage. One telemetry station consists of primary station and standby station is located in the monitoring building itself. Six remote stations are located along Sarawak River catchment. Each of them is located at Kampung Bengoh, Kampung Skio, Kampung Bogag, Kampung Dlinbim, Karnpung Siburuh and Karnpung Sandong. Telemetry gives the information of water level and real-time data. Sarawak River Barrage also has the MIKE1 1 model to calculate the flow and water level especially during flooding.

Gambar

Figure 1 Sarawak River Basin
Table 1 Comparison Between  Year  1963  and  2004  Flood Station

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 8 Figure 9 Figure 10 Figure 11 Figure 12 Figure 13 Figure 14 Figure 15 Figure 16 Figure 17 Figure 18 LIST OF

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23a 23b -v- LIST OF FIGURES Title Conduction Temperature Profile Approximation to Temperature Profile Behavior of

Number l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 LIST OF FIGURES Schematic Diagram of Apparatus Full-Scale Drawing of Calorimeter Photograph of Calorimeter Photograph of Calorimeter

List of Figures and Tables Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 8: Flow Chart; a pictorial representation of the research Flow Chart; an in-depth

LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page Figure 1 Causes of Honeycomb 5 Figure 2 Cracks in Beam 7 Figure 3 Leakage of Water Due to Crack in Structure 8 Figure 4 Severe Crack in a Bridge

LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Rapid Application Development chart 9 Figure 2 Screenshot of Textual Output to User 13 Figure 3 Dijkstra's Algorithm DA highlighting the shortest path

LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 The Human Nerve System 7 Figure 2 Illustration of the Nerve Cell 8 Figure 3 Illustration ofthe Spinal Cord 9 Figure 4 Illustration of Acute Pain

xi FIGURES 1 2 3 4 5a 5b 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 LIST OF FIGURES TITLE Water harvesting at terrace houses in Sandakan Schematic section of housing above ground