holy angel university

(1)

HOLY ANGEL UNIVERSITY School of Engineering & Architecture

Engineering Program

University Vision, Mission, Goals and Objectives:

Mission Statement (VMG)

We, the academic community of Holy Angel University, declare ourselves to be a Catholic University. We dedicate ourselves to our core purpose, which is to provide accessible quality education that transforms students into persons of conscience, competence, and compassion. We commit ourselves to our vision of the University as a role-model catalyst for countryside development and one of the most influential, best managed Catholic universities in the Asia-Pacific region. We will be guided by our core values of Christ-centeredness, integrity, excellence, community, and societal responsibility. All these we shall do for the greater glory of God. LAUS DEO SEMPER!

College Vision, Goals and Objectives:

Vision

A center of excellence in engineering and architecture education imbued with Catholic mission and identity serving as a role -model catalyst for countryside development

Mission

The School shall provide accessible quality engineering and architecture education leading to highly competent professional;

continually contribute to the advancement of knowledge and technology through research activities; and support countryside development through environmental preservation and community involvement.

(2)

Goals

The School of Engineering and Architecture is known for its curricular programs and services, research undertakings, and community involvement that are geared to produce competitive graduates:

- who are equipped with high impact educational practices for global employability and technopreneurial opportunities;

- whose performance in national licensure examinations and certifications is consistently above national passing rates and that falls within the 75^th to 90^th percentile ranks; and,

- who qualify for international licensure examinations, certifications, and professional recognitions.

Objectives

In its pursuit for academic excellence and to become an authentic instrument for countryside development, the School of Engineering and Architecture aims to achieve the following objectives:

1. To provide students with fundamental knowledge and skills in the technical and social disciplines so that they may develop a sound perspective for competent engineering and architecture practice;

2. To inculcate in the students the values and discipline necessary in developing them into socially responsible and globally competitive professionals;

3. To instill in the students a sense of social commitment through involvement in meaningful community projects and services;

4. To promote the development of a sustainable environment and the improvement of the quality of life by designing technology solutions beneficial to a dynamic world;

5. To adopt a faculty development program that is responsive to the continuing development and engagement of faculty in research, technopreneurship, community service and professional development activities both in the local and international context;

6. To implement a facility development program that promotes a continuing acquisition of state of the art facilities that are at par with leading engineering and architecture schools in the Asia Pacific region; and,

7. To sustain a strong partnership and linkage with institutions, industries, and professional organizations in both national and international levels.

(3)

Relationship of the Program Educational Objectives to the Mission of the School of Engineering & Architecture:

Engineering Program Educational Outcomes (PEOs):

Within a few years after

graduation, the graduates of the Engineering programs are expected to have:

Mission The School shall provide

accessible quality engineering and architecture education leading to high professional competence.

The School shall continually contribute to the advancement of knowledge and technology through research activities.

The School shall support

countryside development through environmental preservation and community involvement.

1. Demonstrated technical

competence   

2. Shown a commitment to life- long learning

  

3. Exhibited success in their chosen profession

  

4. Manifested faithful stewardship

  

Relationship of the Engineering Program Outcomes to the Program Educational Objectives:

Engineering Student Outcomes (SOs):

At the time of graduation, Engineering program graduates should be able to:

PEOs

1 2 3 4

a) Apply knowledge of mathematics, physical sciences, and engineering sciences to the practice of

Engineering.    

b) Design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data.    

(4)

c) Design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and

sustainability, in accordance with standards.

    d) Function on multidisciplinary teams.

    e) Identify, formulate and solve engineering problems.

    f) Have an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility.

    g) Demonstrate and master the ability to listen, comprehend, speak, write and convey ideas clearly

and effectively, in person and through electronic media to all audiences.    

h) Have broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global,

economic, environmental, and societal context.    

i) Recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning and to keep current of the

development in the field.    

j) Have knowledge of contemporary issues.

    k) Use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.

    l) Have knowledge and understanding of engineering and management principles as a member and

leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments.     m) Engage in service-learning program for the promotion and preservation to local culture and

tradition as well as to the community.    

(5)

COURSE SYLLABUS

Course Title PNEUMATICS Course Code PNEUMAT

Course Credit 3 Units Year Level 5

^th

Year

Pre-requisite: Elective Course Calendar 1

^st

Semester

Course Description:

Control and Testing; Electromechanical, analog, and digital measuring and testing instruments; R, L and C measurements: calibration;

graphic and waveform analyzing instruments; and detectors for the measurements of process variables; analysis of performance characteristics of control systems, electronics, magnetic, hydraulic and mechanical control.

Course Outcomes (COs):

After completing this course, the students will be able to:

Relationship to the Student Outcomes:

a b c d e f g h i j k l m

1. Know the basic concepts of Pneumatics and Electro-

pneumatics. I

2. Demonstrate skills in designing Pneumatics and Electro-

pneumatics circuits. D

3. Set up, simulate and troubleshoot Pneumatics and

Electro-pneumatics circuits and application. E

4. Demonstrate mastery of the subject matter and complex D

(6)

thinking skills.

Final Course Output

Learning Outcomes Required Output/s Due Date

Design of a Pneumatic System for industrial

application Pneumatic Circuit Design Week 18

Rubric for Assessment

Criteria Needs Improvement

(25%) Satisfactory (50%) Good (75%) Excellent (100%)

Design Problem and Boundaries (15%)

Little or no grasp of problem. Incapable of producing a successful solution.

Some understanding of problem. Major

deficiencies that will impact the quality of solution.

Overall sound understanding of the problem and constraints.

Does not significantly impair solution.

Clear and complete understanding of design goal and constraints.

Use of Appropriate Tools and Components

(Computer–Aided Tools) (25%)

Serious deficiencies in understanding the correct selection and/or use of tools.

Minimal application and use of appropriate tools.

Computer–aided tools used with moderate effectiveness to develop designs.

Computer–aided tools are used effectively to

develop and analyze designs.

Final Design (60%)

Not capable of achieving desired objectives.

Barely capable of achieving desired objectives..

Design meets desired objectives.

Design meets or exceeds desired objectives.

(7)

COURSE ORGANIZATION

Time

Frame Hours Course Outline

HAU CORE VALUES

Specific Expression

of values

Teaching & Learning Activities Assessment Tools

1-2 6 1. Introduction to Pneumatics 1.1 Compressed Air

Production 1.2 Distribution of

Compressed Air 1.3 Preparation of

Compressed Air 1.4 Pneumatic

structure and Symbols 1.5 Pneumatic

Working Elements 1.6 Valves

1.6.1 Directional 1.6.2 Non-Return 1.6.3 Pressure

Control 1.6.4 Flow Control 1.6.5 Shut-Off

Excellence Instill the value of technical competence and

standards.

Lecture, Class discussion and problem solving

Problem Set Assignment Quiz 1

(8)

3-8 18

2. Applications of Pneumatic Cylinders 3. Pneumatic Circuit

Design

standards.

Problem Set Assignment Seatwork Quiz 2 & 3

9 MIDTERM EXAMINATION

10-12 9 4. Electro-Pneumatics 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Standard Electrical

Symbols

standards.

Problem Set Assignment Seatwork

13-14 6 4. Electro-Pneumatics 4.3 Logic Circuits 4.4 Relays

4.5 Solenoid Valves

standards.

Problem Set Assignment Seatwork Quiz 4 & 5

15-17 9 4. Electro-Pneumatics

4.6 Timers

4.8.1 ON Delay 4.8.2 OFF Delay 4.7 Counter

4.8 Limit switch 4.9 Sensors

4.11.1 Proximity 4.11.2 Reed Switch 4.10 Applications of

Electro-

standards.

Problem Set Assignment Seatwork Quiz 6

(9)

Pneumatics 4.11 Electro-

Pneumatic Circuit Design

18 FINAL EXAMINATION

(10)

Course References:

A. Basic Readings

1. Basu, S. (2015). Power Plant Instrumentation and Control Handbook: A Guide to Thermal Power Plants. Amsterdam:

Elsevier

2. Bolton, W. (2015). Instrumentation and Control Systems. Amsterdam: Elsevier

3. De Silva, C. (2016). Sensors and Actuators: Engineering System Instrumentation. Boca Raton: CRC Press 4. Northrop, R. B. (2014). Introduction to Instrumentation and Measurements. Boca Raton: CRC Press

5. Rathore, U. (2016). Basic Instrumentation System & Programmable Logic Controller. New Delhi: S.K. Kataria & Sons

6. Sheel, S. (2014). Instrumentation: Theory and Applications. Oxford, UK: Alpha Science International

(11)

Course Requirements

1. 2 Major Exams (Midterms and Finals) 2. 6 Quizzes

Grading System

Class Standing/Quizzes (60%) 2 Major Exams (40%)

TOTAL (100%) Passing Grade (50%)

CAMPUS++ COLLEGE ONLINE GRADING SYSTEM

Legend: (All Items in Percent)

CSA Class Standing Average for All Performance Items (Cumulative) M Midterm Examination Score

F Final Examination Score MEA Major Exam Average

MCA Midterm Computed Average FCA Final Computed Average

Computation of Midterm Computed Average (MCA) CSA =

MEA = M

MCA = (60%)(CSA) + (40%)(MEA) Computation of Final Computed Average (FCA)

CSA =

(12)

Date

Prepared: Date Effectivity: Prepared By: Checked By: Approved By:

May, 2017 June, 2017 Engr. Elmer A. Perez Faculty, EE Program

Engr. Flaviano D. Dula Chair, EE Program

Dr. Felicito S. Caluyo

Dean, School of Engineering and Architecture

MEA =

FCA = (60%)(CSA) + (40%)(MEA) Passing Percent Average: 50

Transmutation Table

Range of Computed Averages Range of Transmuted Values Grade General Classification

94.0000 – 100.0000 97 – 100 1.00 Outstanding

88.0000 – 93.9999 94 – 96 1.25 Excellent

82.0000 – 87.9999 91 – 93 1.50 Superior

76.0000 – 81.9999 88 – 90 1.75 Very Good

70.0000 – 75.9999 85 – 87 2.00 Good

64.0000 – 69.9999 82 – 84 2.25 Satisfactory

58.0000 – 63.9999 79 – 81 2.50 Fairly Satisfactory

52.0000 – 57.9999 76 – 78 2.75 Fair

50.0000 – 51.9999 75 3.00 Passed

Below Passing Average 5.00 Failed

6.00 Failure due to absences 8.00 Unauthorized or unreported withdrawal

Note: A student's Computed Average is a consolidation of Class Standing Percent Average and Major Exam Percent Average.

Course Policies

Maximum Allowable Absences: 10 (held 3 times a week); 7 (held 2 times a week)