• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Directions.pdf - ConCourt Collections - Constitutional Court

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "Directions.pdf - ConCourt Collections - Constitutional Court"

Copied!
2
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT

CCT/1/95

In the matter between

PEET RENS Applicant

and

THE STATE Respondent

DIRECTIONS GIVEN IN TERMS OF RULE 22

1 . The Cape of Good Hope Provincial Division has referred the following issue to the Constitutional Court:

"Whether the provisions of Section 316 of the Criminal Procedure Act, 51 of 1977 relating to applications by an accused convicted of an offence before a superior court for leave to appeal against his conviction or sentence and providing in terms of Section 315(4) of the said Act that such appeal shall be only if such leave to appeal is granted and not as of right, are .unconstitutional by reason of inconsistency with Section 25(3) (h) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 1993 and of no force and effect pursuant to Section 4 of the Constitution."

(2)

- 2 -

2. The record in this matter shall consist solely' of the judgement given by Mr. Justice Rose Innes on the 15th June 1994.

3. The Registrar is requested to cause the record to be prepared and lodged with the Registrar of the Constitutional Court by not later than 15 March 1995.

4. Subject to the provisions of these directions, the issue referred to in paragraph 1 will be disposed of in terms of Rule 22(4) of the rules of the Constitutional Court. The Applicant's argument shall be lodged with the Registrar of the Constitutional Court by not later than the 24th February 1995 and the Respondent's argument shall be lodged with the Registrar of the Constitutional Court by not later

than 24th March 1995.

5. The matter has been set down for hearing before the Constitutional Court at Johannesburg at 10:00 a.m. on the 2nd May 1995.

6. The attention of the parties and the Registrar is drawn to the provisions of Rule 1 (3) and Rule 32 (which incorporates Rule 62 of the Uniform Rules) .

M.S. NIENABER REGISTRAR

\ ' ~LJT£±£fi\$^ X" *~S "- _'-•*' " ~i* %=.T

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Today the Constitutional Court handed down judgment in an appeal against the order of the Western Cape High Court, Cape Town High Court, concerning the constitutional validity of

THE COMPARISON BETWEEN INDONESIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT AND RUSSIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT Lintje Anna Marpaung Law Faculty University of Bandar Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia Corresponding

The applicant and the respondents are directed to file written submissions on: a whether a proportionality enquiry applies to forfeiture of proceeds of unlawful activities under

KODE/CODE 2712 DOCEX54 E-MAIL: [email protected] Ons/Our Mr HSJ Kruger/M Capazorio/ms DB0081 U/Your ATTTENTION: OUMA THE DIRECTOR; CONSTITUTIONAL COURT BRAAMPARK FORUM II 33 HOOFD

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Cases CCT 323/18 and CCT 69/19 Case CCT 323/18 In the matter between: JABULANE ALPHEUS TSHABALALA Applicant and THE STATE Respondent and

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Cases CCT 27/19 and CCT 86/19 Case CCT 27/19 In the matter between: ROAD TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT CORPORATION Applicant and TASIMA PTY LIMITED

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Case CCT 111/11 In the matter between: MATHILDA LOUISA WIESE Appellant and GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND First Respondent MINISTER OF

If the respondent wishes to oppose the application for confirmation it shall advise the Registrar of the Constitutional Court of its intention to do so by not later than 11 September