• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

suppmat334. 33KB Jun 05 2011 09:30:47 PM

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "suppmat334. 33KB Jun 05 2011 09:30:47 PM"

Copied!
10
0
0

Teks penuh

Loading

Gambar

Table S1.  Internal geometries for the selected alkanes
Table S2.  Comparison of calculated and experimental frequencies for ethane
Table S3.  Comparison of calculated and experimental frequencies for propane
Table S4.  Comparison of calculated and reference vibrational freqencies for butane
+6

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Conformational energy with soft empirical (red dashes lines) and MMFF94s van der Waals (blue dotted lines) “1-5,1-6” repulsion potential is calculated at different values of

     Given that some of the listed experimental values are wrong, it is fair to ask how a choice 

Partial atomic charges were obtained using CHELPG to fit the charges to the quantum mechanical electrostatic potential computed from ab initio 6-31G** wave functions calculated with

bThis imaginary frequency arises from selecting the force field stationary state with the geometry closest to the corresponding ab initio structure for comparison.. In this case

Table with details of the experimental structures used for the force field refinement For the definition of structural parameters see Chart

Supplementary material: MP2(full)/6-31G* optimized geometries of the different compounds. included in

Hertwig, Wolfram Koch and Brian F.. Geometries were optimized at CCSD(T)/Basis

What is the number of degrees of freedom for an N-stage countercurrent cascade of non-adiabatic