• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

appendices_w2.doc 108KB Jun 05 2011 09:30:46 PM

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "appendices_w2.doc 108KB Jun 05 2011 09:30:46 PM"

Copied!
50
0
0

Teks penuh

Loading

Gambar

Table I.  Force Constants and Reference Values in the QMFF for Amides
Table II.A.  Comparison of Formamide Structures Optimized by Ab Initio Calculation (HF/6-31G*) and by the HDFF and QMFF Force Fields.
Table II.B.  Comparison of Planar Acetamide Structures Optimized by Ab Initio
Table II.E.  Comparison of N,N-Dimethylformamide Structures Optimized by Ab Initio  Calculation (HF/6-31G*) and by the HDFF and QMFF Force Fields.
+7

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Ground and excited state CASPT 2 geometry optimisations of small organic molecules.

Conformational energies are calculated in the rigid geometry model with ICFF (red dashed lines) and MMFF94s (blue dotted lines) “local” energy functions at different values of

MATRIX WITH THE DISCRETE VALUES FOR EACH ROTATION ANGLE AND ITS CORRESPONDING ENERGY VALUE FOR THE FIRST ROTATION FOR BASIC STRUCTURE. Labels in bold were not used in

The bond lengths were allowed to refine in an interval that was 0.05 Å larger than the maximum values of all occurences of the respective bond, the bond stretching force constants

bromide, compared to the scaled structures, gave rms differences of 0.004 Å and 1.16 degrees, 0.003 Å and 1.68 degrees, and 0.005 Å and 1.42 degrees, respectively, for the bond

The electrostatic potential points used are those of the merged sets of points used in the CHELP, CHELPG, and Merz-Kollman methods, except for the two copper complexes where

Table with details of the experimental structures used for the force field refinement For the definition of structural parameters see Chart

QCISD(T) energies at the MP2 optimized geometry and the B3LYP energies at the B3LYP optimized geometries, dipole moments calculated at the HF/6-31G* level of theory are in Debyes... a