THE EFFECT OF PEER REVIEW STRATEGY ON THE
STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE
PARAGRAPH
A THESIS
Submitted to the English Department, Faculty of Language and Art, State University of Medan in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirement for
the Degree of Sarjana Pendidikan
By:
SRI AGUS MURNIASIH
REGISTRATION NUMBER: 2103321043
ENGLISH AND LITERATURE DEPARTMENT
FACULTY OF LANGUAGES AND ARTS
ABSTRACT
Murniasih, Sri Agus. 2103321043. The Effect of Peer Review Strategy on the Students’ Achievement in Writing Descriptive Paragraph. A Thesis. English Department. Faculty of Languages and Arts. State University of Medan. 2015
This study was conducted to know the effect of applying Peer Review Strategy on the students’ achievement in writing descriptive paragraph. It was conducted by using experimental research method. This research design was conducted pre-test, post test in experimental and control group. The population of this research was the eight (VIII) grade students of SMP IT IQRA’ Medan. The sample of this research was taken by lottery technique. They were in class VIII-1 by experimental group and the class VIII-2 by control group. The experimental group was taught by using Peer Review Strategy while the control group was given no treatment. The instrument used to collect the data was writing essay test. The data were analyzed by using test formula. The result showed that the value of t-observed was higher than the value of t-table. (3,55 > 2,05 ( = 0.05)) with the degree of freedom (df) = 28. It means that there was a significant effect of applying Peer Review Strategy on the students’ achievement in writing descriptive paragraph. So, the alternative hypothesis (Ha) was accepted.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Firstly, praise and great gratitude to the almighty God Allah SWT for His blessing, mercy, opportunity and helping the researcher to complete this Thesis entitled “The Effect of Peer Review Strategy on the Students’ Achievement in Writing Descriptive Paragraph “ as one of requirement for the degree of Sarjana Pendidikan (S1) at English Department, Faculty of Language and Arts, State University of Medan.
During the process of writing and conducting the research, the writer was assisted and supported by many people. This Thesis could have not been accomplished without guidance, suggestion, and comment from them, for which the writer would like to express her sincere appreciation which directed to:
Prof. Dr. Ibnu Hajar Damanik, M.Si., the Rector of State University of Medan.
Dr. Isda Pramuniati, M.Hum.,the Dean of Language and Arts Faculty, Vice Dean I, II,III and all the administrative staff.
Prof. Dr. Hj. Sumarsih, M.Pd., the Head of English Department. Dra. Meisuri, M.A., the Secretary of English Department .
Dra. Masitowarni Siregar, M.Ed., the Head of English Education Department.
Dra. Rahma, M.Hum., the Head of English Literature Department. Dr. I Wayan Dirgeyasa, M.Hum., her Thesis Supervisor.
Prof. Dr. Lince Sihombing, M.Pd., her Academic Advisor and her Reviewer.
Dr. Sri Minda Murni, M.S., Indra Hartoyo, S.Pd., M.Hum., as her Reviewer and Examiner
Alm. Husin and Siti Rohati, S.Pd, her beloved parent.
All my familiy members, Julinda Wati S.Pd, Bambang Irwanto, Hardianto, and Rahmayanto, her best brother and sister.
Her lovely classmates, DIK Extension A,B and C 2010, for the wonderful four years.
Her beloved friends, Muhammad Ridwan, Asri Rumiris, Fitri Handayani Lubis, Tiarmayanti, Yenni Roffina, Yusniar for always support and helped the writer during completing her thesis
Her closed friends in PPLT SMP N1 Pagar Merbau, who helped writer during completing her thesis.
The researcher hopes this thesis can give contribution to the English education students and further pedagogical research. And also it can be useful for the readers.
Medan, March 2015 The Researcher
TABLE OF CONTENTS
a. Definition of Descriptive Paragraph ... 13
b. Generic Structure of Descriptive Writing ... 15
6. Peer Review Strategy ... 16
7. The Application of Peer Review Strategy ... 20
8. Assessment in Writing ... 21
B. Conceptual Framework ... 23
C. Hypothesis ... 24
CHAPTER III: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ... 25
A. Research Design ... 25
B. Population and Sample ... 25
1. Population ... 25
2. Sample ... 26
C. The Instrument for Collecting Data ... 26
D. The Procedures of the Research ... 26
1. Pre-test ... 26
2. Treatment ... 27
3. Post-test ... 28
E. The Content Validity and The Reliability of The Test... 28
1. The Content Validity of the Test ... 28
2. The Reliability of the Test ... 29
F. The Technique of Data Analyzing Data ... 30
CHAPTER IV: THE DATA ANALYSIS ... 31
A. The Data ... 31
B. Data Analysis ... 33
1. Validity of the Test ... 33
2. Reliability of the Test ... 33
3. Test of Homogeneity of Variance ... 34
4. Testing Normality ... 34
5. T-Test ... 35
C. Testing Hypothesis ... 36
D. Research Finding ... 37
E. Discussion ... 38
CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS... 40
A. Conclusion ... 40
B. Suggestions ... 40
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1.1. Score Writing Descriptive Paragraph ... 3
Table 2.1. Textual Elements of Descriptive Paragraph ... 15
Table 2.2.Writing Assessment ... 21
Table 3.1. Research Design ... 25
Table 3.2. Treatment for Experimental Group ... 27
Table 4.1.Students’ Achievement Score in pre-test and post-test... 32
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX A Pre-Test for Experimental Group and Control Group ... 43
APPENDIX B Post-Test for Experimental Group and Control Group ... 44
APPENDIX C Treatment for Experimental Group ... 45
APPENDIX D The score of Pre-Test and Post-Test In Experimental Group ... 50
APPENDIX E The score of Pre-Test and Post-Test in Control Group ... 51
APPENDIX F The Reliability of the Test ... 52
APPENDIX G Test for Distribution of Frequency in Experimental Group ... 54
APPENDIX H Test for Distribution of Frequency in Control Group ... 58
APPENDIX I Testing Normality ... 62
APPENDIX J Table of Normality ... 70
APPENDIX K List of Testing Lilliefors ... 71
APPENDIX L Test for Homogeneity of Variance ... 72
APPENDIX M Table Distribution ... 76
APPENDIX N The Calculation of t-test for Control Group ... 77
APPENDIX O Percentage Points of The T Distribution ... 80
APPENDIX P Lesson Plan ... 81
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
A. The Background of the Study
Last year, the government decided to try out the new designed curriculum
2013 from elementary, junior high school and senior high school. The curriculum
2013 has a specific objective of the language teaching-learning process to make
students active in the language class both in oral and written. English is one of
the lessons that has four skills, they are listening, speaking, reading and writing.
Related to curriculum, writing is one of the language skill that has a
complexity process in teaching (Reid, 1993:266). Writing is a communicative
skill,writing is not only a process of linking words into sentences or paragraphs,
but it is a sequence or steps of ideas, organized thoughts and feeling in the form of
words and combined into sentences into form of paragraphs in which every
sentences is closely related one another.
However, writing skill is more complex and difficult to teach, requiring
the mastery not only the grammatical and theoretical deviced but also the
conceptual and judgment. For many English learners, learning to write fluently in
English is much more challenging and difficult than learning to speak fluently.
Learning to write is difficult especiallyfor those who write in a second or foreign
language;they must write accurately within a limited time. If the English teacher
tries to enable students toproduce fluent, accurate and appropriate writtenEnglish,
there are a number of aspects which need tobe considered (mechanics of writing,
2
There are some benefit of writing, namely are; (1) the writing is a means to
find something, in sense can raise ideas and information that exists in nature under
aware of our thinking,(2) writing activities can be brought new ideas be active, (3)
writing activities can train the ability to organize and clarify concepts or ideas, (4)
writing activities can practice detachment that is in someone, (5) writing activities
can help us to rehearse solve several problems at once, (6) writing activities in a
field of science will allow us to be active and not just be recipients information. In line with the students’ writing at SMP IT IQRA’ Medan while trying to
adapted with the curriculum 2013, the researcher found problem in writing a
descriptive paragraph, the students got confuse of what to write and how to start.
Students did not not know to write properly because most of students are not
intersted in learning writing. Most of them also did not have any ideas what
grammar to use or how to organize the ideas. They perhaps have ideas in their
mind but they don’t know how to organize or express their point views in writing.
Those problems related to their knowledge before the treatment and the way they
assumed that english is complicated one. The writer found the student can not
write it individually. They need to have a group or pairs discussion to share
3
It is shown in the following table:
Table 1.1. The Eighth Grade Students’ Score of Descriptive Writing in
TheLast Two Semester in SMP IT IQRA’ Medan.
Semester Score Student Percentage
Semester 1 2013/2014 <70 9 66,6%
≥70 6 33.3%
Semester 2 2013/2014 <70 11 60%
≥70 4 40%
Related to the problem mentioned previously, the way of teaching needs to
be improved. Writing descriptive paragraph is a way for students to express their skill and share about they’ve seen. Less vocabulary and knowledge of sentence
structure the are main problem why they fell difficult to express it. By adding their
knowledge in vocabulary and sentence structure teacher hopes that writing
descriptive paragraph will help students to express everything in their mind.
There are many strategies in improving the way of teaching writing text.
However, it is determined to apply Peer Review Strategy in this study because by
applying Peer Review, it will help students to get some new vocabularies and
what we have written with others, our readers, to see if we have been successful in
4
applied in group. Working in group can be a productive and congenial part of
writing process in which it can increase the possibility that the students will look
at problems from several perspective. In peer review strategy, students not only
get feedback from their classmates, but they also give feedback to their classmate.
Peer review strategy is works best when students have read, guide with
question or focused tasks, prepared comments on the paper and be ready
discussion. Then give students a clear format for peer review and require written
reviews.
Peer Review has some strengths and advantages such as: a) evaluating
peer writing, b) facilitating discussion and debate, c) facilitating students to give
suggestions and comments, d) providing students field to share and help each
other, e) peer review makes students more aware of general problems in their own
writing, f) peerreview encourages students' sense of ownership of their writing,
helping to promote learnerautonomy. Peer Reviewing allows a diversity of
opinions to be brought to the table, pre-set ideas from the equation and removing
personal biases which these elements will help students to write well.
Thus, in line with the background above, the writer tries to study the effect of peer review strategy on improving students’ ability in composing descriptive
writing and tries to prove that by applying peer review, student in certain school
will be helped extreamly in writing descriptive paragraph.
B. The Problem of Study
5
investigation of writing by using peer review strategy. To find the specific
element of writing, the problem that students faced, and help students to write
better than before, the problem of this research was stated in following statement: “Is there any significant effect of peer review strategy on the students’
writing descriptive paragraph?”
C. The Objective of the Study
In relation to the problem the objective of the research is to find out the
effect of using peer review strategy in teaching descriptive paragraph.
D. The Scope of the Study
There are some genres in writing that can be applied to see the students writing skill. This study concentrated to see the improvement of students’ writing
descriptive paragraph, especially describing person. The strategy that will be
applied to improve students achievement in writing descriptive paragraph ispeer
review strategy that can guide students to write well.
E. The Significance of the Study
It is expected that this research will give some significances.
1. For teachers, it might show teacher that peer review and other forms
ofinteresting material could be used for teaching writing. This study alsocould
give motivation to the English teacher to create new ways or media in teaching
6
2. For students, it might motivate students to improve their interest in writingsince
they would find out that English writing material was not complicated, boring and
monotonous.
3. For teacher and researcher,the result can be used as process to improve the
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS
A. Conclusion
After analyzing the data, it was concluded that use of peer review
significantly effects the students’ achievement in writing descriptive paragraph,
since t-observed>t-table (43.55>2.042;df=28, α=0.05). The used of peer review
strategy in writing descriptive paragraph, the students to explore their ideas with
their own words and as a stimulus to increase their creativity in writing include
the level of vocabulary development and able to gave suggestions and comments
in teaching process. It can help the students more be active. It means the null
hypothesis (Ho) was rejected and alternative hypothesis (Ha) was accepted
because there was significant effect of using peer review on the students’
achievement in writing descriptive paragraph.
B. Suggestions
Based on the conclusion above, the researcher gives suggestion as
following:
1. The English teacher was suggested to apply peer review strategyin
teaching descriptive paragraph as an essential part of thewriting process.
2. The students was suggeted to be more active, confidance, and enjoyable
and exploring their writing ability by peer review strategy.
3. Other researchers, it is expected to the readers who are interested in
dealing with this study so that they have a good understanding to support
REFERENCES
Brix, J., Grainger, P., & Hill, A. (2014). Investigating Mandatory Peer Review of Teaching In Schools. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(4).
Brown, H. Douglas.2001. Teaching by principles, an Interactive Approach to language Pedagody.2nd.ed.new York; Longman
Dirgayasa Wayan I. 2012. A Genre Based Approach. Maritime English Writing,Unimed Press
Harmer, Jeremy. 2004. How to Teach Writing. London: Longman
Harmer, Jeremy. 1899. Writing English Language Tests. London and New York
Heaton. J. 1988. Writing English Language Tests. London: Longman
Knapp, Peter &Watknis, Megan. 2005. Genre, Text, Grammar: Technologies for Teaching and Assessing Writing. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press Ltd.
Mayers, Alan.(005). Gateway to Academic Writing. United States of America:Addison Wesley Longman.Inc
Min Hui-Tzu. 2006. The Effect of Trained Peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second language Writing. Taiwan:University Road
Mittan, R. (1989). The peer review process: Harnessing students' communicative power. In D. M. Johnson & D. H. Roen (Eds.).Richness in Writing: Empowering ESLStudents (pp.207-219). White Plains, NY: Longman.
Pardiono.2007. PastiBisaTeaching Genre-Based Writing. Yogyakarta: Andi
Reid, Joy M. 1993. Teaching ESL Writing. New York: Prentice Hall Regents
Wishon and Burks. 2005. Research-Based Unit and Lesson Planning: Maximizing student Achievment. USA: Littlefield Education.
White, C. 1989. Writer’s Art. A Practical Rethoric and Handbook. California:Wars-Worth Publishing
Van den Berg, I., Admiraal, W. and Pilot, A. (2006). Design principles and outcomes of peer assessment in higher education, Studies in Higher Education, 31(3), pp.341-356.
http://teacher-eeductor.jimdo.com/social-science/strategy-method/
http://writingcenter.unc.edu/handouts/paragraphs/. accessedon April 15,2014