DAFTAR PUSTAKA
1. Shawkat ES. The effect of the oxygen inhibition layer on interfacial bond strengths and stain resistance of dental resin composites. Thesis. Birmingham: College of Medical and Dental Sciences University of Birmingham, 2009: 2-24. 2. Joshi P. Rujuta C. Silorane composite system: review article. Scientific Journal
2008: II.
3. El-Nawawy M, Koraitim L, Abouelatta O, Hegazi. Marginal adaptation of nanofilled, packable and hybrid dental composite resins stored in artificial saliva.
American Journal of Biomedical Engineering 2012; II(3): 105-14.
4. Cakir D, Sergent R, Burgess JO. Polymerization shrinkage-a clinical review. Aegis Communication 2007; 3(8).
5. Karthick K, Kailasam S, Priya G, Shankar S. Polymerization shrinkage of composite– A review. JIADS 2011; 2(2).
6. Nisha G, Amit G. Textbook of operative dentistry. New Delhi: Jaypee, 2010: 248-67.
7. Gupta KV, Verma P, Trivedi A. Evaluation of microleakage of various restorative materials: An in vitro study. J Life Sci. 2011; III(1): 29-33.
8. Roberson MT, Heymann HO, Ritter AV. Introduction to composite restorations. In: Sturdevant's Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. 5th ed., St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby Elsevier, 2009: 504–14.
9. Ghulman MA G. Effect of cavity configuration (C factor) on the marginal adaptation of low-shrinking composite: A comparative ex vivo study. International Journal of Dentistry 2011.
10.Baum L, Philips RW, Lund MR. Buku ajar ilmu konservasi gigi. Ed 3. Jakarta: EGC, 2007.
11.Hilton TJ, Broome JC. Direct posterior esthetic restoration. In: Fundamental of Operative Dentistry: A contemporary approach. 3rd ed., New Delhi, India: Quintessence Books, 2006: 306-7
12.Bergmann P, Noack MJ, Roulet JF. Effect of cavity design on the marginal fit of class I composite fillings. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1990; 45(10). (Abstract)
13.Terry D LK. Composite resin restorations : a simplified approach. Private Academy of Dental Therapeutic and Stomatology: 2008 http://www.ineedce.com. (21 Juli 2012)
16.Product Profile. FiltekTM Silorane: Low shrink posterior restorative Silorane
System adhesive: Self-etch primer and bond. 3M ESPE 2007: 2-7.
17.Weinmann W, Thalacker C, Guggenberger R. Silorane in dental composites. Dent Mater. 2005. 21(1): 68-74.
18.Al-Boni R, Raja OM. Microleakage evaluation of silorane based composite versus methacrylate based composite. J of Cons Dentistry 2010; 13(3).
19.Study Booklet. A collection of scientific results: Filtek P90 low shrink posterior restorative. 3M ESPE 2007.
20.Duarte S, Botta AC, Phark Jin-Ho, Sadan A. Selected mechanical and physical properties and clinical application of a new low-shrinkage composite restoration. Quintessence International 2009; 40(8).
21.Anusavice, KJ. Philip: buku ajar ilmu bahan kedokteran gigi. Ed. 10. Jakarta: EGC, 2004: 248.
22.Filho HN, et al. Volumetric polymerization shrinkage of contemporary composite resin. J Appl Oral Sci 2007; 15(5).
23.Braga RR, Ballester RY, Ferracane JL. Factors involved in the development of polymerization shrinkage stress in resin-composites: a systematic review. Dental Materials 2005; 21: 963-66
24.O’Brien WJ. Polymeric Restoration materials. In: Dental Materials and Their Selection. 4th ed., Canada: Quintessence Books 2008: 121.
25.Sikri KV. Textbook of operative dentistry. 2nd ed., Amritsar: CBS, 2009: 364-5, London: BC Decker Inc, 2002: 127, 209-11
28.Perdigao J, Swift EJ. Fundamental concepts of enamel and dentin adhesion. In: Sturdevant's art and science of operative dentistry. 5th ed., St. Louis, Missouri:
Mosby Elsevier 2009: 245-56.
29.Bayne SC, Thompson JY. Biomaterial. In: Sturdevant's art and science of operative dentistry. 5th ed., St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby Elsevier 2009:185-88.
30.Tseng KC, Weinberg GA, Woodlock DF. Dental adhesives–the foundation of estethic dentistry. Academy of General Dentistry 2007.
31.Mutluay AT, Lassila LVJ, Valittu PK. Incremental layers bonding of silorane composite: the initial bonding properties. Finland: University of Turku. 2008. 32.Suhail RI, Al-Khafaji AH. The effect of low shrinkage dental composite on the
fracture strenght of weakened premolar teeth (An in vitro study). J Bagh College Dentistry 2011; 23(3): 32-5.
33.Studervant JR. Clinical significance of dental anatomy, histology, physiologi and occlusion. In: Studervant’s Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. 5th ed., St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby Elsevier, 2009: 20.
34.Jazar HA, El Sayed GE, Mahmoud SH, Hassan AM. Microleakage and surface hardness of resin based restorative materials cured with led and qth curing units. Cairo Dental Journal 2009; 25(3): 403.
35.Bo-Tao, Lin H, Zheng G, et al. Comparison between a silorane-based composite and methacrylate-based composites: shrinkage characteristics, thermal
properties, gel point and vitrification point. Dent Mater J 2012; 31(3).
36.Van Ende A, Munck JD, Mine A, Lambrecht P, Van Meerbeek B. Does a low-shrinking composite induce less stress at the adhesive interface. Dent Mater 2009; 10(3).
37.Coelho-de-Souza FH, Camacho GB, Demarco FF, Powers JM. Fracture resistance and gap formation of MOD Restorations: influence of restorative
technique, bevel preparation and water storage. Operative Dentistry 2008; 33(1). 38.Coelho-de-Souza FH, et al. A randomized double-blind clinical trial of posterior
composite restorations with or without bevel: 1-year follow up. J Appl Oral Sci 2012; 20(2).
