106
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Abadzivor, H. E. (2006). Assessment of pictorial materials in Ghanaian pre-school education (A case study in Kumasi Metropolis). (Tesis). Faculty of Fine Art, University of Science and Technology, Kumasi.
Adhiya, E. (2014). Tes diagnostik two-tier pilihan ganda untuk mengidentifikasi miskonsepsi siswa pada materi geometri molekul berdasarkan teori VSEPR. (Skripsi). FPMIPA, UPI, Bandung.
Ali, M. (1987). Penelitian kependidikan: prosedur dan strategi. Bandung: Angkasa.
Alwi, H. (2005). Kamus besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan.
Arifin, Z. (2012). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Arikunto, S. (2015). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan. (edisi kedua). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Barke, H.D. dkk. (2009). Misconception in chemistry. Berlin: Springer.
Bayrak, B.K. (2013) . Using two-tier test to identify primary students’ conceptual understanding and alternative conceptions in acid base. Mevlana International Journal of Education . 3(2), hlm. 19-26.
Carney, R.N & Levin, J.R. (2002). Pictorial illustrations stillimprove students’ learning from text. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), hlm. 5-26.
Chandrasegaran, A.L., Treagust, D.F. & Mocerino, M. (2007) . The development of a two-tier multiple-choice diagnostic instrument for evaluating secondary school students’ ability to describe and explain chemical reactions using multiple levels of representation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. 8(3), hlm. 293–307.
Dahar, R.W. (2013). Teori-teori belajar dan pembelajaran. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.
Depdiknas. (2007). Tes diagnostik. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Manajemen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah, Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Pertama.
Devetak, I. & Glazar, S.A. (2009) . The influence of 16 year old students’ gender, mental abilities and motivation on their reading and drawing submicrorepresentations achievements. International Journal of Science Education . 32(12) , hlm. 1561-1593.
Devetak, I. dkk. (2004). Submicroscopic representations as a tool for evaluating students’ chemical conceptions. Acta Chemistry Slovakia. 51, hlm. 799-814.
Devetak, I., Vogrinc, J & Glazar, S.A. (2009). Assessing 16-year-old students’ understanding of aqueous solution at submicroscopic level. Acta Chemistry Slovakia. 39, hlm. 157-179.
Dewi, E.P. (2015). Pengembangan tes diagnostik two tier berbasis piktorial untuk mengidentifikasi miskonsepsi siswa pada materi asam basa. (Skripsi). FPMIPA, UPI, Bandung.
Edens, K.M. & Potter, E.F. (2001). Promoting conceptial understanding through pictorial representation. Studies in Art Education. 42(3), hlm. 214-233.
Ema & Mukhtar W. (2000) . Konstruksi ke arah penelitian deskriptif. Yogyakarta: Ayyrrouz.
Firman, H. (2013). Evaluasi pembelajaran kimia. Bandung: UPI.
Goh, Khang, N., & Sai, C.L. (1992). Students' learning difficulties on covalent bonding and structure concepts. Teaching and Learning, 12(2), hlm. 58-65.
Hasanah, N.A. (2015). Profil miskonsepsi siswa kelas XI pada materi larutan penyangga menggunakan tes diagnostik multiple choice. (Skripsi). FPMIPA, UPI, Bandung.
Henrickson, C. (2005). Chemistry. Canada: Wiley Publishing Inc.
Imam, A & Singh, G.P. (2015). Influence of gender and familial factor’s on mathematics achievement of secondary school students. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Studies. 2, hlm. 50-57.
KBBI. (t.t). “Arti kata profil”. [Online]. Diakses dari http://kbbi.co.id/arti-kata/profil.
Kurnia, A. (2014). Pengembangan instrumen tes diagnostik two-tier untuk mengidentifikasi miskonsepsi siswa SMP pada pokok bahasan klasifikasi materi (Skripsi). FPMIPA, UPI, Bandung.
Krausse, S.J., dkk. (2013). The effect of a visually –based intervention on student’s misconceptions related to solutions, solubility and saturation. American Society for Engineering Education . 7926.
Lewis, R. & Wynne, E. (2006). Chemistry. (third edition). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lutan, R. (2000). Pengukuran dan evaluasi penjaskes. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
McMurry, J.E. & Fay, R.C. (2012). Chemistry. (sixth edition). New York: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Muchtar, H.M. (2016). Profil miskonsepsi siswa SMA pada materi Larutan elektrolit dan nonelektrolit menggunakan Tes diagnostik two-tier multiple choice berbasis piktorial. (Skripsi). FPMIPA, UPI, Bandung.
Mudjijanti, F. (2011). “Pengaruh tes masuk berdasarkan nilai ujian nasional (UN) terhadap prestasi belajar siswa”. Jurnal Fakultas Ilmu Psikologi Universitas Katolik Widya Mandala Madiun. 2, hlm. 19-31.
Mulyani, S. (1983). Psikologi pendidikan. Jakarta: IKIP.
Naah, B. M. & Sanger M. J. (2012). Student misconceptions in writing balanced equations for dissolving ionic compounds in water. Chemistry Education Research And Practice. 13, hlm. 186–194.
Nabila, S. (2015). Profil miskonsepsi siswa SMA kelas XI menggunakan instrumen tes diagnostik two tier multiple choice pada materi asam-basa. (Skripsi). FPMIPA, UPI, Bandung.
Nakhleh, M. B. (1992). Why some students don’t learn chemistry. Journal of Chemistry Education. 69(3), hlm. 191-196.
Nazir, M. (1988). Metode penelitian. Jakarta: Ghalia.
Nurpertiwi, T. (2014). Pengembangan instrumen tes diagnostik two-tier multiple choice untuk mengidentifikasi miskonsepsi siswa SMA pada materi hidrolisis garam. (Skripsi). FPMIPA, UPI, Bandung.
Nyachwaya, J.M. dkk. (2011). The development of an open-ended drawing tool: an alternative diagnostic tool for assesing students understanding of the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Chemistry Education Research and Practice. 12, hlm. 121-132.
Ozmen, H. (2004). Some student misconceptions in chemistry: a literature review of chemical bonding. Journal of Science Education and Technology (JRST). 13( 2). hlm. 147-159.
Peraturan Pemerintah No. 69 Tahun 2013 tentang Kurikulum SMA-MA.
Pertiwi. (2012). Profil kondisi fisik atlet anggar di Kabupaten Purworejo Jawa Tengah. (Skripsi), FPOK, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta.
Phillips, A.D. (1979). Measurement and evaluation in physical education. Canada: John Whiley and Sons Inc.
Qureshi, M. A. (2013). Misconcepts: an educational dilemma to deal with. Journal of Medical and Life Sciences, 1(1), hlm. 15-18.
Rahmawati, T. (2014) . Profil miskonsepsi siswa SMA pada materi hidrokarbon menggunakan tes diagnostik pilihan ganda dua tingkat. (Skripsi). FPMIPA, UPI, Bandung.
Riduwan. (2006). Skala pengukuran variabel-variabel penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Rofifah, R. (2015). Pengembangan tes diagnostik two-tier berbasis piktorial untuk mengidentifikasi miskonsepsi siswa pada larutan elektrolit dan nonelektrolit. (Skripsi), FPMIPA, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Schmidt, H.C., Kaufman B., & Treagust, F.D. (2009). Students’ understanding of boiling point and intermolecular forces. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 10, hlm. 265-272.
Sears dkk. (1985). Psikologi sosial. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Silberberg, M.S. (2007). Principles of general chemistry. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies.
Silverius, S. (1991). Evaluasi hasil belajar dan umpan balik. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.
Soedjono. (2005). Metode penelitian deskriptif. Yogyakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Sudarmo, U. (2014). Kimia untuk SMA/MA kelas X. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Sudjana. (2002). Metode statistika. Bandung: Penerbit Tarsito.
Sudijono, A. (2011). Pengantar evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada.
Suharno. (1984). Testologi pengantar. Jakarta: PT. Bina Aksara.
Sukardi. (2011). Evaluasi pendidikan: prinsip dan operasionalya. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.
Sukardjo. (1985). Ikatan kimia. Jakarta: PT. Bina Aksara.
Sunarya, Y. & Setiabudi, A. (2009) . Mudah dan aktif belajar kimia untuk kelas X Sekolah Menengah Atas/Madrasah Aliyah. Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan Kementrian Pendidikan Nasional.
Suparno, P. (2013). Miskonsepsi dan perubahan konsep dalam pendidikan fisika. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Susetyo, B. (2015). Statistika untuk analisis data penelitian. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Susiani, D. (2009). Profil fisik atlet Taekwondo Sleman pada PORPROV. DIY. (Skripsi). FIK, UNY, Yogyakarta.
Syarifudin, N. (1994). Ikatan kimia. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Taasoobshirazi, G. & Carr, M. (2008). Gender differences in science: an expertise perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 20, hlm. 149-169.
Tan, K.C.D & Treagust, D.F. (1999). Evaluating students’ understanding of chemical bonding. School Science Review, 81 (294), hlm. 75-83.
Tan, K.C.D. Goh, N. K., Chia, L. S. & Treagust, D.F. (2002). Development and application of a two tier multiple choice diagnostic instrument to assess high school students’ understanding of inorganic chemistry qualitative analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(4), hlm. 283-301.
high school students’ understanding of ionisation energy. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 6 (4), hlm. 180-197.
Tarhan, L., Ayar-Kayali, H., Urek, R.O., & Acar, B. (2008). Problem-based learning in 9th grade chemistry class: “intermolecular forces”. Research Science Education. 38, hlm. 285-300.
Tavassoli, A., Jahandar, S. & Khodabandehlou, M. (2013). The effect of pictorial context on reading comprehension of iranian high school students : a comparison between pre-vs. during reading activities. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences, 3 (3), hlm. 553-565.
Treagust, D. F. (2006). Diagnostic assessment in science as a means to improving teaching, learning and retention. Science and Mathematics Education Centre, Curtin University of Technology, Australia. hlm. 1-11.
Treagust, D.F. (1986). Evaluating students' misconceptions by means of diagnostic multiple choice items. Research In Science Education, 16, hlm. 199-207.
Treagust, D.F. (1999). Diagnostic assessment of students’ science knowledge. In Glynn, S.M, Duit R. (Eds.), learning science in the schools: research reforming practice. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate, hlm. 327-346.
Treagust, D.F. (2007). Development and use of diagnostic test to evaluate students’ misconcepstions in science. International Journal of Science Education. 10(2), hlm. 159-169.
Treagust, D.F. (2009). Conceptual understanding of Bruneian tertiary students: chemical bonding and structure. Brunei International Journal of Science & Mathematica Education. 1(1), hlm. 33-51.
Tȕysȕz, C. (2009). Development of two-tier diagnostic instrument and assess students’ understanding in chemistry. Scientific Research and Essay. 4 (6), 626 – 631.
Watoni, A.H. & Kurniawati, D. (2015). Kimia untuk SMA/MA kelas X. Bandung: Yrama Widya.
Wu, H.K. Krajcik, J. & Soloway, E. (2001). “Promoting Understanding of Chemical Representations: Students' Use of a Visualization Tool in the Classroom”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 38(7), 821-842.
