DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Abadzivor, H. E. Assessment of pictorial materials in ghanaian pre-school education (a case study in kumasi metropolis). [Online]. Tersedia: http://dspace.knust.edu.gh:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/627/1/HUMP H RY%20ETSE%20ABADZIVOR.pdf.Diakses 06 Februari 2016
Abraham, M.R., Aileen B.G., J.W. Renner, & Edmund A.M. (2007) Understandings of eighth graders of five chemistry concepts found in textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(2), hlm. 105 – 120.
Adadan, E & Savasci, F. (2012). An analysis of 16 – 17 – year – old students’ understanding of solution chemistry concepts using a two – tier diagnostic instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 33(4), hlm. 513 – 544.
Adams, W.K & Wieman, C. E. (2010). Development and validation of instruments to measure learning of expert – like thinking. International Jornal of Science Education, 33(9), hlm. 1 – 24.
Adodo, S. O. (2013). Effects of two – tier multiple choice diagnostic assessment
items on student’s learning outcome in basic science technology (BST). International Academic Journal of Interdiciplinary Studies Published by MCSERCEMAS – Sapienza University of Rome, 2(2), hlm. 201 – 210.
Agustini, N. (2014). Pengembangan tes diagnostik pilihan ganda dua tingkat untuk mengidentifikasi miskonsepsi siswa pada materi ikatan kimia. (Skripsi). Jurusan Pendidikan Kimia, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Ahiakwo, M. J. (2013). Effect of two – tier multiple choice diagnostic assessment
items on students’ learning outcome in Basic Science Technology (BST). Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(2), hlm. 201 – 210.
Annisa, N. (2013). Pengembangan tes diagnostik pilihan ganda dua tingkat untuk mengidentifikasi miskonsepsi siswa kelas X pada materi hidrokarbon. (Skripsi). Jurusan Pendidikan Kimia, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Arikunto, S. (2008). Dasar – dasar evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Bayrak, B.K. (2013). Using two –tier test to identify primary student’s conceptual understanding and alternative conceptions in acid base. Mevlana Internasional Journal of Education, 3(2), hlm. 19 - 26.
Berg, V.D.E. (1991). Miskonsepsi fisika dan remediasi. Salatiga: Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana.
Boo, H.K, Tan, K.C.D., Goh & Chia. (2001). Alternative conceptions of chemical
bonding”. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in S.E. Asia,
24(2), hlm. 40 – 50.
Carney, R.N. & Levin, J.R. (2002). Pictorial illustration still improve students’ learning from text. Educational PsychologyReview, 14(1),hlm. 5 – 26.
Chandrasegaran, A.L., Treagust, D.F. & Mocerino, M. (2007). “The development of a two – tier multiple choice diagnostic instrument for evaluating
secondary school students’ ability to describe and explain chemical
reactions using multiple levels of representation”. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(3), hlm.293 – 307.
Chang, R. (2003). Kimia dasar : Konsep-konsep inti. Penerjemah : Martoprawiro, M. A., dkk. Jakarta : Penerbit Erlangga.
Chang, R. (2010). Chemistry Education 10th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Cronbach, l.L. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.
Psuchometrika, 16(3), hlm. 297 – 334.
Dahar, R.W. (2011). Teori – teori belajar & Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Dahsah, C., dan Coll R.K. (2007). “Thai grade 10 and 11 students’ understanding of stoichiometry and related concepts”. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,6, hlm. 573 – 600.
Danili, E, & Reid, N. (2006). Cognitive factors that can potentially affect pupils’ test performance. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(2), hlm. 64 – 83.
Daryanto, M. (2008). Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Demicioglu, G., Demircioglu H., & Yadigaroglu. (2013). An investigation of chemistry student teachers’ understanding of chemical equilibrium.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional (2007). Tes diagnostik. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Devetak, I., Vogrinc, J., & Glažar, S.A. (2007). Assessing 16-year-old students’ understanding of aqueous solution at submicroscopic level.Research Science Education, hlm. 1 – 23.
Dikmenli. (2010). Misconceptions of cell division held by student teachers in biology: A drawing analysis. Scientific Research and Essay, 5(2), hlm. 235–247
Firman, H (2013). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Kimia. Bandung: UPI.
Gliem, J.A. & Gliem, R.R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting
cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for likert – type scales. Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, hlm. 82 – 88.
Haladyna, T.M, dan Rodriguez, M.C. (2013). Developing and validating test items. [e – book]. Tersedia di: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=DQNxvjHfJxAC&printsec=frontcov er&dq=Developing+and+validating+test+items.&hl=id&sa=X&ved=0ah UKEwj6zfuT6pvMAhWIRI4KHVixBA4Q6AEIGTAA#v=onepage&q= Developing%20and%20validating%20test%20items.&f=false. Diakses 1 April 2016
Halakova, Z. & Proksa, M. (2007). Two kinds of conceptual problems in chemistry teaching. Journal of Chemical Education, 84(1), hlm. 172 - 174
Hanson, R. (2015). Identify student’s alternative concepts in basic chemical
bonding – a case study of teacher trainees in the university of education, Winneba. International Journal of Innovative Research & Development, 4(1), hlm. 115 – 122.
Johari, J.M.C & M. Rachmawati. (2007). Kimia 1 SMA dan MA untuk Kelas X. Jakarta: ESIS.
Johnstone, A.H. (2000). Teaching of Chemistry – logical or psychological.
Kawulich, B., Garner, M.W.J., dan Wagner, J. (2009). Students’ conceptions – and misconceptions – of social research. Qualitative Sociology Review, 5, hlm. 5 – 25.
Kose, S. (2008). Diagnosing student misconceptions: using drawing as a research method. Journal World Applied Sciences, 3(2), hlm. 283 – 293.
Kumpha, P., Paisan, S. & D.F. Treagust. (2014). Thai grade 10 conceptual
understanding of chemical bonding”. Procedia :Social and Behavioral Science, 143, hlm. 657 – 662.
Lawshe, C.H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personel Psychology, 28, hlm. 563 – 573.
Lewis, R. & Evans W. (2006). Chemistry. Edisi ketiga. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Loh, A.S.L, R. Subramaniam & K.C.D. Tan. (2014). Exploring students’ understanding of electrochemical cells using an enhanced two – tier diagnostic unstrument. Research in Science & Technological Education,
32(3), hlm. 229–250.
Mehrens, W.A. & Lehmann, I.J. (1973). Measurement and evaluation: An education and psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart and winston, Inc. Morgil, I., Seyhan, H.G., Secken, N., Yucel, A.S., Temel, S., dan Ural, E. (2009).
“Overcoming the Determined Misconception in Melting and Dissolution through Question and Answer and Discussion Methods”. Chemistry, 3(3), hlm.49 – 61.
Nakhleh, M. B. (1992). Why some students don’t learn chemistry. Journal of Chemistry Education, 80(11), hlm. 191 – 196.
Noh, T. & Scharmann, L.C. (1998). Inatructional influence of a molecular – level
pictorial presentationof matter on students’conceptions and problem –
solving ability. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(2), hlm. 199
– 217.
Ozmen, H. (2004). Some student misconceptions in chemistry: a literature review of chemical bonding. Jurnal of Science Education and Technology,
13(2), hlm. 147 – 159.
Peterson, R.F., D. F. Treagust, & P. Garnett. (1986). Identification of a Scientific Conception: Toward a Theory of Conceptual Change. Science Education,
66(2), hlm. 211-227.
Purnamasari, R. (2014). Pengembangan tes diagnostik two – tier multiple choice untuk mengukur pemahaman konsep siswa kelas pada materi kelarutan dan hasil kali kelarutan. (Skripsi). Jurusan Pendidikan Kimia, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Purwanto, M.N. (2006). Prinsip- Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya
Putra, S.R. (2013). Desain Evaluasi Belajar Berbasis Kinerja. Yogyakarta: Diva Press.
Rachmaniah, A. (2014). Pengembangan Tes Piktorial untuk Mengukur Penguasaan Pengetahuan Konseptual Siswa SMA pada Materi Konsep Mol. (Skripsi). Jurusan Pendidikan Kimia, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Rahayu, I. (2009). Praktis Belajar Kimia untuk Kelas X. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Rofifah, R. (2015). Pengembangan tes diagnostik two – tier berbasis piktorial untuk mengidentifikasi miskonsepsi siswa pada materi larutan elektrolit dan ninelektrolit. (Skripsi). Jurusan Pendidikan Kimia, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Silver, N.C., Michael, S.M, Blair, M.B, & Barbara L.G. (1995). Comprehension and percieved quality of pictorial warning. Proceeding of Human Factors and Ergonomycs Society 39th Annual Meeting.
Stojanovska, M., Petrusevski, V.M., &Soptrajanov, B. (2014). Study of the use three levels of thinking and representation. Contribution, Sec. Nat. Math. Biotech. Sci., MASA, 35(1), hlm. 37 – 46.
Sugiarty, A. (2014).Pengembangan Tes Piktorial untuk Mengukur Pengetahuan Faktual, Konseptual, dan Prosedural Siswa SMA pada Materi Laju Reaksi. (Skripsi). Jurusan Pendidikan Kimia, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Sukardi, H.M. (2008). Evaluasi pendidikan: prinsip dan operasionalnya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Suparno, P. (2005). Miskonsepsi dan Perubahan Konsep Dalam Pendidikan Fisika. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.
Susanti, S.S. (2014). Pengembangan tes diagnostik pilihan ganda dua tingkat untuk mengidentifikasi miskonsepsi siswa kelas pada materi larutan elektrolit dan nonelektrolit. (Skripsi). Jurusan Pendidikan Kimia, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Taber, K. S. & K. C. D. Tan. (2011). The insidious nature of hard-core alternative conceptions: implications for the constructivist research programme of patterns in high school students and pre-service teachers’ thinking about ionisation energy.” International Journal of
Science Education. 33(2), hlm. 259–297.
Tan, K. C. D. dan Treagust, D. F. (1999). “Evaluating student’s understanding of chemical bonding”. School Science Review, 81 (294), hlm. 75 – 83.
Tan, K. C. D., N.H. Goh, L.S. Chia & D.F. Treagust. (2002). Development and application of a two – tier multiple choice diagnostic instrument to assess
high school student’s understanding of inorganic chemistry qualitative analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(4), hlm. 283 – 301.
Tan, K. C. D., K.. S. Taber, N.H. Goh, & L.S. Chia (2005). The Ionization energy diagnostic instrument : a two – tier multiple choice instrument to
determine high school students’ understanding of ionisation energy. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 6(4), hlm. 180 – 197.
Tarakchi, M., dkk. (1999). A cross – age study of high school student’s understanding of diffusion and osmosis. H.U. Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 15, hlm. 84 – 93.
Treagust, D. F., Haslam, F. (1986). Evaluating secondary student' misconceptions of photosynthesis and respiration in plants using a two-tier diagnostic instrument. A paper presented at the 59th Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in &ience Teaching, San Francisco, CA.
Treagust, D.F. (2006). Diagnostic assessment in science as a means to improving teaching, learning and retention. Science and Mathematics Education Centre, Curtin University of Technoogy, Australia, hlm.1 – 11.
Tuysuz, C. (2009). Development of two – tier diagnostic instrument and assess students’ understanding in chemistry. Scientific research and essay, 4(6), hlm. 626 – 631.
Whitten, K.W, dkk. (2004). General chemistry seventh edition. Amerika: BrooksCole.
