S KIM 1100346 Bibliography

(1)

114

Rifa Rofifah, 2015

PENGEMBANGAN TES DIAGNOSTIK TWO-TIER BERBASIS PIKTORIAL UNTUK MENGIDENTIFIKASI MISKONSEPSI SISWA PADA MATERI LARUTAN ELEKTROLIT DAN NONELEKTROLIT

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Annisa, N. (2013). Pengembangan tes diagnostik pilihan ganda dua tingkat untuk mengidentifikasi miskonsepsi siswa kelas X pada materi hidrokarbon. (Skripsi). Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.

Barke, H.D., Al-Hazari, dan Yitbarek, S. (2009). Misconception in chemistry. Berlin: Springer.

Berg, van den E. (1991). Miskonsepsi Fisika dan Remediasi. Salatiga: Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana

Calik, M. dan Ayas, A. (2005). A cross study on the understanding of chemical solutions and their components. International Education Journal. 6 (1), hlm. 30-41.

Carney, R.N., Levin, J.R. (2002). Pictorial illustrations still improve students’ learning from text. Educational Psychology Review, 14 (1), hlm. 5-26.

Chandrasegaran, A.L., Treagust, D.F., Mocerino, M. (2007). The development of a two-tier multiple-choice diagnostic instrument for evaluating secondary school students’ ability to describe and explain chemical reactions using multiple levels of representation. Chemistry Education Resea rch and Practice, 8 (3), hlm. 293-307.

Chang, R. (2005). Kimia da sar, konsep-konsep inti. Edisi Ketiga Jilid Satu. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Chiu, M.H. (2004). A National Survey of Students’ Conceptions in Chemistry in Taiwan. Chemical Education International, 6 (1), hlm. 1.

Cronbach, L.J., (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psuchometrika, 16 (3), hlm. 297-334.

Davetak, I., Urbancic, M., Grm, K.T.S., Krnel, D. (2004). Submicroscopic

representations as a tool for evaluating students’ chemical conceptions. Acta

Chim, 51, hlm. 799-814.

Davetak, I., Vogrinc, J., Glazar, A., (2008). Assessing 16-year-old students’ understanding of aqueous solution at submicroscopic level. Springer. 39 (1), hlm. 157-179.

Depdiknas. (2007). Tes diagnostik. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Manajemen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah, Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Pertama.

(2)

115

Rifa Rofifah, 2015

PENGEMBANGAN TES DIAGNOSTIK TWO-TIER BERBASIS PIKTORIAL UNTUK MENGIDENTIFIKASI MISKONSEPSI SISWA PADA MATERI LARUTAN ELEKTROLIT DAN NONELEKTROLIT

Fung, K. (2010). The initial development and content validity of an asperger’s syndrome self-screening instrument for adults. (Tesis). Master of Education University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon.

GCSE Chemistry 5CH2H 01. (2012). Examiners’ report. Pearson Education. 2

(1), hlm. 1-52.

Gliem, J.A. dan Gliem, R.R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting

cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for likert-type scales. Midwest

Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, hlm. 82-88.

Haladyna, T.M., & Rodriguez, M.C. (2013). Developing and Validating Test Items [e-book]. Tersedia di: http://books.google.co.id? uL5BQPFO3MC&oi=fnd&pg=PP2&dq=developing+and+validating+item+ test+haladyna&ots=iCcQQLtqGj&sig=lR8AuCAGsGfYZOjUBkO8PAJ90y g&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=developing%20and%20validating%20item %20test%20haladyna&f=false . [3 Juli 2015]

Jansoon, N., Coll, R.K., Somsook, E. (2009). Understanding mental models of dilution in Thai students. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4 (2), hlm. 147-168.

Johari, J.M.C. dan Rachmawati, M. (2007). Kimia SMA dan MA untuk kelas X. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Johnstone, A.H. (2000). Teaching of chemistry – logical or psychological. Chemistry Education:Research and Practice in Europe, 1 (1), 9-15.

Kean, E., Middlecamp, C. 1985. Panduan belajar kimia dasar. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Lawshe, C.H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personel Psycology. 28, hlm.563-573.

Makmun A. S. (2001). Psikologi kependidikan, perangkat sistem pengajaran modul. Bandung: PT Rosdakarya.

Modic, A.L. (2011). Student misconception-identifying and reformulating what they bring to chemistry table. (Tesis). Master of Science, Montana University, Bozeman.

(3)

116

Rifa Rofifah, 2015

PENGEMBANGAN TES DIAGNOSTIK TWO-TIER BERBASIS PIKTORIAL UNTUK MENGIDENTIFIKASI MISKONSEPSI SISWA PADA MATERI LARUTAN ELEKTROLIT DAN NONELEKTROLIT

Nakhleh, M. B. (1992). Why some students don’t learn chemistry. Journal of Chemistry Education, 80 (11), hlm. 191-196.

Nuraeni, J. (2014). Pengembangan tes diagnostik pilihan ganda dua tingkat untuk mengidentifikasi miskonsepsi siswa pada materi gaya antarmolekul. (Skripsi). Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.

Osman, K. dan Sukor, N.S. (2013). Conceptual understanding in secondary school chemistry: A discussion of the difficulties experienced by students. American Journal Applied Science, 10 (5), hlm. 433-441.

Peterson, R.F., Treagust, D.F. dan Garnett P.J. (1989). Development and application of a diagnostic instrument to evaluate grade 11 & 12 students’ concepts of covalent bonding and structure after a course of instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26, hlm. 301-314.

Purnamasari, R. (2012). Pengembangan tes diagnostik two tier multiple choice untuk mengukur pemahaman konsep siswa pada materi kelarutan dan hasil kali kelarutan. (Skripsi). Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.

Rahman, M.S. (2010). Analisis kesulitan siswa kelas X pada pembelajaran larutan elektrolit dan nonelektrolit menggunakan metode discovery-inquiry. (Skripsi). Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.

Sabaniati, A. (2009). Analisis hasil belajar level makroskopis, mikroskopis dan simbolik siswa sma pada materi pokok larutan elektrolit dan nonelektrolit. (Skripsi). Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.

Simamora, B. (2002). Paduan riset perilaku konsumen. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Stojanovska,M., Petrusevski, V.M., Soptrajanov, B. (2014). Study of the use three levels of thinking and representation. Contributions, Sec. Nat. Math. Biotech. Sci., MASA, 35 (1), hlm. 37-46.

Sunarya, Y. dan Setiabudi, A. (2006). Mudah dan aktif belajar kimia untuk kelas X SMA/MA Program IPA. Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan Depdiknas (BSE).

Susanti, S.S. (2014). Pengembangan tes diagnostik pilihan ganda dua tingkat untuk mengidentifikasi miskonsepsi siswa pada materi larutan elektrolit dan nonelektrolit. (Skripsi). Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.

Tan, K.C.D. dan Treagust, D.F. (1999). Evaluating students’ understanding of chemical bonding. School Science Review, 81, hlm. 75-83.

(4)

117

Rifa Rofifah, 2015

PENGEMBANGAN TES DIAGNOSTIK TWO-TIER BERBASIS PIKTORIAL UNTUK MENGIDENTIFIKASI MISKONSEPSI SISWA PADA MATERI LARUTAN ELEKTROLIT DAN NONELEKTROLIT

school students’ understanding of inorganic chemistry qualitative analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39 (1), hlm. 283-301.

Tan, K.C.D., Taber, K.S., Goh, N.K. dan Chia, L.S. (2005). The ionisation energy diagnostic instrument: a two-tier multiple choice instrment to determine high

school students’ understanding of ionisation energy. Chemistry Education

Research and Practise, 6 (4), hlm. 180-197.

Tavassoli, A., Jahandar, S. dan Khodabandehlou, M. (2013). The effect of pictorial context on reading comprehension of iranian high school students : a comparison between pre-vs. during reading activities. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences, 3 (3), hlm. 553-565.

Tien, L.T. (2007). Effectiveness of MORE Laboratory Module in Prompting Student to Revise Their Molecular-Level Ideas about Solutions. Journal of Chemical Education, 84 (1), hlm. 175-177.

Treagust, D.F. (2006). Diagnostic assessment in science as a means to improving teaching, learning and retention. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Centre. D.F.Treagust@curtin.edu.au [Online]. (http://JchemEd.wisc.edu/JCEWWW/Features/CqandChP/ExTypesConcept Questions.htm1#Tieredquestion).

Tüysüz, C. (2009). Development of two-tier diagnostic instrument and assess

students’ understanding in chemistry. Academic Journal, 4 (6), hlm.

626-631.

Whitten, K.W., Davis, R.E., Peck, M.L., Stanley, G.G., (2003). General chemistry seventh edition. Amerika : BrooksCole.

Wu, H.K., Krajcik, J.S., Soloway, E. (2001). Promoting Understanding of Chemical Representations: Students' Use of a Visualization Tool in the Classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38 (7), hlm. 821-842. Zumdahl, S.S., Zumdahl, S.A. (2007). Chemistry seventh edition. Boston: