DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Açisli, Sibel et al. (2011). Effects of the 5E learning model on students’ academic achievements in movement and force issues. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 15 (), 2459–2462
Ajaja. O. P., Urhievwejire. & Eravwoke. O. (2012). Effects of 5E Learning Cycle on Students’ achievement in Biology and Chemistry. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 7 (3), 244-262.
Amin, M (2015). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) dalam Pembelajaran Fisika untuk Meningkatkan kemampuan Berargumentasi, Penalaran Ilmiah, dan Kognitif Siswa SMA. Tesis Magister Pendidikan Fisika. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia : Bandung.
Anderson, W. L. & Krathwohl (Editor). (2010). Kerangka Landasan untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, dan Asessmen. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning To Teach, Ninth Edition. New York: The
McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Arikunto, S. (2013). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (edisi 2). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Artun, H. & Costu, B. (2012). Effect of the 5E Model on Prospective Teacher’ Conceptual Understanding of Diffusion and Osmosis. Springer,J Sci Edu2-9371c Technol. DOI 10.1007/s10956-012-9371-2
Ash, D. (2000). The Process Skills of Inquiry, Foundation, edisi agustus: 51-62 Balcit, S., Cakiroglu, J. & Tekkaya, C. (2006).Engagement, Exploration,
Beatty, I. D., Gerace, W. J., Leaonard, W. J., & Dufresne, R. J. (2006). Designing effective question for classroom response system teaching. American Journal of Physics 74, 31-39. Caldwell JE (2007). Clikers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips. CBE Life Sci Educ 6, 9-20.
Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Scotter, P. V., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. 2006. The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins,
Effectiveness, and
Applications.http://www.bscs.org/pdf/bscs5eexecsummary.pdf
Calik, M. & Ayas, A. (2004). A Comparison of Level of Eighth-Grade Students and Science Student Teacher Related to Selected Chemistry Concepts. Journal of Research in Scinece Teaching. Vol. 24, No. 6, PP. 638-667. Calik, M., & Mehmed,A.K. (2008). Using Different Conceptual Change Methods
Embedded within the 5E Model: A Sample Teaching for Heat and Temperature. J. Phys. Educ. Online, 5(1), 3-7.
Carin, A.A (1993). Teaching Modern Science,6th ed. New York: Maxwell macmillan International.
Chandra, M. (2014). Penggunaan Website Dalam Model Perubahan Konseptual dengan Setting Kooperatif Problem Solving untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep dan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa SMA pada Materi. Tesis Magister Pendidikan Fisika. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Tidak diterbitkan.
Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M. H. and La Vancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-477. Chi, M.T.H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M.W., Reimann, P. and Glaser, R. (1989). Self
Colt, H. G., Davoudi, M., Murgu, S., Rohani, N. Z. (2011). Measuring Learning Gain During a One-Day Introductory Course. Surg. Endost. 25(1): 207 – 216.
Cummings, K. & Stephen G. Roberts. (2008). A Study of Peer Instruction Method with High School Physics Student. Physics Education Research Conference. AIP Conference Proceedings, Volume 10644, pp. 103 – 106.
Dahar, R. (1996). Teori-teori Belajar. Jakarta: Erlangga
Demirbas, Murat & Huseyin M.P. (2015). Evaluation of Experiments conducted about 5E Learning Cycle Model and Determination of the Problem Encountered. Internasional Journal of Education Science. 7 (1), 51- 64 Dolan, E. & Grady, J. (2009). Recognizing Students’ Scientific Reasonin: A Tool
for Categorizing Complexity of Reasoning During Teaching by Inquiry.Journal Scinece Teacher Education. Vol. 21:31-55.
Duran, D., Duran, L., Haney, J., & Scheuermann, A. (2011). A Learning Cycle for All Student, Modifying the 5E Instructional Model to Address the Needs of All Learne
Eisenkraft, A. (2003). Expanding The 5E Model: A Proposed 7E Model Emphasizes “ Transfer Of Learning “ And Impostance Of Eliciting Prior Understanding, The Science Teacher, 70 (6), hlm. 57-59.
Faramita, S. (2015). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Yang Dipadukan Dengan Strategi Peer Instruction untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Kognitif dan Efikasi-Diri Siswa SMA Pada Materi Suhu dan Kalor. Tesis Magister Pendidikan Fisika. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Tidak diterbitkan.
Furtak, E. M. (2010). A Framework for Analyzing Evidence-Based Reasoning in Science Classroom Discourse. Educational Assesment, 15: 175-196, 2010. Furtak, E. M. (2010).The Evidence-Based Reasoning Framework: Assesing
Scientific Reasoning. Educational Assesment, 15: 123-141, 2010.
Gobert D. Janice & John J. Clement. (1999). Effects of Student-Generated Diagrams versus Student-Generated Summaries on Conceptual Understanding of Causal and Dynamic Knowledge in Plate Tectonics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 36(1), 39 – 53
Hake, R. R. (1989). Interactive-Engagement Versus Tradisional Methode: A Six-Thousand Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses. Am. J. Phys. 66 (1), 64-74
Hanuscin, D. L. & Lee, M. H. (2007). Using a Learning Cycle Approach to Teaching the Learning Cycle to Preservice Elementary Teacher. Paper presented at the 2007 annual meeting of the Association for Science
Teacher Education, Clearwater, FL. 1–4
Havard Magazine. (2015). Mazur Wins Minerva Prize. [Online]. Tersedia di : http://havardmagazine.com/2014/05/mazur-minerva-prize.
Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhammer, G. (1992). Force Concept Inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30, 141.
Husni, A., Juanda, E.A. & Hamidah, I. 2010. Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Berbantuan Web Pada Materi Fluida Statis Untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Siswa SMA.Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika 2010. p 451-458.
James, M. C., Barbieri, F., & Paula, G. (2008). What are They Talking About? Lesson Learnrd from A Study of Peer Instruction. The Astronomy Education Review, Issues, Volume 7, pp. 37 – 43.
Janice, M.Y. (2013). Using peer intruction pedagogy for teaching dynammics : Lessons Learned from pre-Class Reading Quizze. Proceeding of the Canadian Engineering Education Association.
Jufri, A. W (2010). Belajar dan Pembelajaran Sains. Pustaka Reka Cipta : Jakarta.
Kanli, U. (2009). Root and Evolution of Learning Cycle Model in Light of Contructivist Theory-A sample Activity. Education and Science, 34 (151), 44-64.
Karplus, R. (1980). Teaching for The Development of Reasoning. Science Education Information Report: The Ohio State University.
Kemendikbud. (2014). PPT sosialisasi kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan
Knight, J. K. & Wood, W. B. (2005). Teaching More by Lecturing Less. Cell Biol Educ., 4 (4) 298-310.
Kurniawati, I. D., Wartono, & Diantoro. (2004). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing yang dipadukan dengan peer instruction Terhadap Penguasan
Konsep dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, Vol. 10, 36-46.
Larkin, J., & H. Simon. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11, 65–99
Lawson, A (2003). The Nature and development of hypothetico-predictive argumentation with implications for science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1387-140
Liu, TC., Peng, H., Wu, WH., & Lin MS. (2009). The Effects of Mobile Natural-science Learning Based on the 5E Learning Cycle: A Case Study. Educational Technology & Society, 12 (4), 344–358
Lorsbach, A. W. (2002). The Learning Cycle As A Tool For Planning Science
Instruction. [Online]. Tersedia di:
http://www.coe.ilstu.edu/scienceed/Lorbach2571rcy.htm. Diakses 10 Februari 2016.
Lutfhy, Nicole. The learning cycle. diakses di http://www.ohiorc.org/pm/science/Sci_LearningCycle.aspx.
Maftuhah. (2015). Penerapan Learning Cycle untuk Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep dan Perubahan Konseptual Siswa SMA Pada Konsep Sistem Koordinasi. Tesis Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. (tidak diterbitkan) Marshall, Jeff C. et al. (2009). 4E x 2 Instructional Model: Uniting Three
Learning Constructs to Improve Praxis in Science and Mathematics Classrooms. Journal Science Teacher Education. (20), 501–516. DOI 10.1007/s10972-008-9114-7
Mazur, E. & Crouch, C. (2001). A Peer Intruction: Ten Years of Experience and Result. Am J. Pys. 69 (9),pp. 970-977.
Miller, K., Schell, J., Andrew,. H., Lukoff, B., & Mazur, E. (2015). Response Switching and Self-Efficacy in Peer Instruction Classroom. Phy. Rev. ST. Phy. Educ. Res 11, 010104, 1-8.
Nanik.(2011). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share dengan Pendekatan Guide Discovery untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman
Konsep Fisika Siswa SMA Kelas X. Skripsi. FPMIPA UPI Bandung. Tidak
diterbitkan.
NRC. (1996). National Science seducation standards. Whashington, DC : National Academies Press.
Patrick, Ajaja, O. (2013). Which way We Go in the Teaching of Biology? Concept Mapping, Cooperative Learning or Learning Cycle?. International Journal of Science and Technology Education Research, 4(2), 18 – 19. Patrick, Ajaja. O. (2013) . Which way We Go in the Teaching of Biology?
Concept Mapping, Cooperative Learning or Learning Cycle?. International Journal of Science and Technology Education Research, 4 (2), 18–29
Purwanto, N. (2009). Prinsip-prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung: Reamaja Rosdakarya.
Ramsey, John. (1993). Developing Conceptual Storylines with the Learning Cycle. Journal of Elementary Science Education. 5(2), 1 – 20
Riduwan. (2012). Skala pengukuran variabel-variabel penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Ruseffendi. (1998). Dasar-Dasar Penelitian dalam Bidang No-Eksakta. Bandung: PT. Tristo.
Rustaman, et al. (2005). Strategi Belajar Mengajar Biologi. Malang: UM Press. Sadi, O. & Cakiroglu, J. (2010). Effect of 5E Learning Cycle on Student’ Human
Circulatory System Achievement. Journal of Applied Biological Science. 4(3), 63 – 67.
Konsep dan Kemampuan Penalaran Ilmiah Siswa SMA. Tesis Magister Pendidikan Fisika. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Tidak diterbitkan.
Slavin, Robert E. (2009). Cooperative Learning : Teori, Riset dan Praktik. Bandung: Nusamedia.
Smith, M. K., Wood, W.B., Adam W.K., Wieman C., Knight J.K., Guild N, Su TT (2009). Why peer discussion imprive student performance on in class concept question. Science Magazine vol. 323, 122-124.
Smith, M.K., Wood, W.B, Krauter, K., & Knight, J.K. (2011). Combining peer discussion with instructor explanation increases student learning from in-class concept question. Life science education, vol. 10, spring, 55-63.
Stiggin, R.J. (1994). Sudent-Centered Classroom Assesment. New York: Macmillan College Publishing Company, Inc.
Sudjana, Nana & Ibrahim. (2012). Penelitian dan Penilaian Pendidikan. Bandung. Sinar baru Algensindo.
Sudjana, Nana. (2005). Metode Statistika. Bandung: Cv Tarsito. Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta
Sugiyono. 2013. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.
Talanquer, Vicente. et al. (2013). Assessing Students’ Understanding of Inquiry: What Do Prospective Science Teachers Notice?. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 50(2), 189 – 208
Taslidere, Erdal. (2015). A Study Investigating the Effect of Treatment Developed by Integrating the 5E and Simulation on Pre-service Science Teachers’ Achievement in Photoelectric Effect. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education. pp. 1-16.
Tipler, P.A. (1998) Fisika untuk Sains dan Teknik. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Tolga. (2012). The Effect of Peer Instruction on Students’ Conceptual Learning and Motivation. Asian-Pasific on Science Learning and Teaching, Vol. 13, Issue 1, Article 1.
Trianto., (2013). Mendesain Pembelajaran Inovative-Progresif.Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Tuna, A. & Kacar, A. (2013).The Effect of 5E Learning Cycle Model inTeaching Trigonometry on Student’ Academic Achievement and the Permanence of Their Knowledge.International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Impications.www.ijonte.org. pp. 73–87
Turk, Fatma & Muammer Calik. (2008). Using Different Conceptual Changes Methods Embedded Within 5E Model: A Sampel Teaching of Endothermic – Exothermic Reactions. Asia Facific Forum of Science Learning and Teaching. 9(1), 1 – 10.
Waldrip, B., Prain, V. & Sellings, P. (2013). Explaining Newton’s laws of motion:
Using student reasoning through representations to develop conceptual
understanding. Instructional Science. doi:10.1007/s11251-012-9223-8.
Young, J. M. (2013). Using Peer Intruction Pedagogy for Teaching Dynamics: Lesson Learned from Pre-Class Reading Quizzes. Proc. Canadian Engineer
