• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Pola Kepekaan Bakteri Penyebab Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP) di ICU RSUP H. Adam Malik Periode Juli-Desember 2014

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Pola Kepekaan Bakteri Penyebab Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP) di ICU RSUP H. Adam Malik Periode Juli-Desember 2014"

Copied!
25
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Lampiran 1

DAFTAR RIWAYAT HIDUP

Nama

: Dasta Senorita Ginting

Tempat/Tanggal Lahir

: Medan/01 Desember 1994

Agama

: Kristen Protestan

Alamat

: Jalan Bunga Sedap Malam IX No.9, Medan

Riwayat Pendidikan

:1. TK Swasta Katholik Assisi (1999-2000)

2. SD Swasta St. Petrus (2000-2006)

3. SMP Negeri 1 Medan (2006-2009)

4. SMA Negeri 15 Medan (2009-2012)

5.Fakultas

Kedokteran

Universitas

Sumatera Utara (2012-sekarang)

Riwayat Pelatihan

:1. Get Together SCORE PEMA FK USU

2013

2. Seminar dan Workshop Basic Life Support

& Traumatology

TBM PEMA FK USU

2013

3. Peserta Penerimaan Mahasiswa Baru

(PMB) FK USU 2012

(2)

ANGGARAN BIAYA PENELITIAN

1. Persiapan Proposal

Rincian

Jumlah

Harga Satuan

Total

Administrasi survei awal

penelitian di RSUP H. Adam

Malik

Rp 75.000,00

Rp 75.000,00

Print proposal awal

50

Rp 500,00

Rp 25.000,00

Print proposal revisi

30

Rp 500,00

Rp 15.000,00

Copy dan Jilid proposal awal

5

Rp 10.500,00

Rp 52.500,00

Copy dan Jilid proposal revisi

5

Rp 7.500,00

Rp 37.500,00

Total

Rp 205.000,00

2. Taksasi Pengumpulan Data

Biaya administrasi

pengambilan data di RSUP H.

Adam Malik Medan

Rp

200.000,00

Rp 200.000,00

Total

Rp 200.000,00

3. Taksasi Analisis data dan revisi

Tinta print

1

Rp 85.000,00

Rp 85.000,00

Kertas A4

1

Rp 30.000,00

Rp 30.000,00

Copy dan Jilid KTI softcover

5

Rp 7.000,00

Rp 35.000,00

Jilid KTI hardcover

5

Rp 20.000,00

Rp 100.000,00

Total

Rp 250.000,00

4. Transportasi

Rp 200.000,00

(3)

Lampiran

Frequencies

[DataSet1] C:\Users\user\Documents\KTI Dasta 2015\Olah data\Dasta Data.sav

Frequency Table

Statistics

27 27 27 27 27

0 0 0 0 0

1.3704 48.52 4.2963 2.44 1.30 1.0000 53.00 5.0000 2.00 1.00

1.00 19 1.00 1 1

2.00 76 7.00 6 2

Valid Missing N

Mean Median Minimum Maximum

Jenis

Kelamin Usia Kategori Usia

Bakteri Penyebab

VAP Onset

Jenis Kelamin

17 63.0 63.0 63.0 10 37.0 37.0 100.0 27 100.0 100.0

laki-laki perempuan Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

(4)

Usia 27 100.0 100.0

19

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Kate gori Usia

2 7.4 7.4 7.4 27 100.0 100.0

<20 tahun 20-30 tahun 31-40 tahun 41-50 tahun 51-60 tahun 61-70 tahun >70 tahun Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

(5)

Frequencies

[DataSet6] C:\Users\user\Documents\KTI Dasta 2015\Olah data\Early onset.sav

Bakteri Penyebab VAP

4 14.8 14.8 14.8 13 48.1 48.1 63.0 7 25.9 25.9 88.9

1 3.7 3.7 92.6

1 3.7 3.7 96.3

1 3.7 3.7 100.0 27 100.0 100.0

E. coli Aci. baumanii K. pneumoniae S. maltophilia S. aureus Ps. aeruginos a Total

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Onset

19 70.4 70.4 70.4 8 29.6 29.6 100.0 27 100.0 100.0

cepat lambat Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Bakteri Penyebab VAP

4 21.1 21.1 21.1 11 57.9 57.9 78.9 4 21.1 21.1 100.0 19 100.0 100.0

E. coli Aci. baumanii K. pneumoniae Total

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

(6)

Frequencies

[DataSet1] C:\Users\user\Documents\KTI Dasta 2015\Olah data\Late onset.sav

Frequency Table

[DataSet3] C:\Users\user\Documents\KTI Dasta 2015\Olah data\Aci.baum.sav

Bakteri Penyebab VAP

2 25.0 25.0 25.0 3 37.5 37.5 62.5 1 12.5 12.5 75.0 1 12.5 12.5 87.5 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 8 100.0 100.0

Aci. baumanii K. pneumoniae S. maltophilia S. aureus Ps. aeruginos a Total

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Ampilicin

1 7.7 7.7 7.7

12 92.3 92.3 100.0 13 100.0 100.0

sens itif resis ten Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Amikacin

6 46.2 46.2 46.2 7 53.8 53.8 100.0 13 100.0 100.0

sens itif resis ten Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Ceftazidime

2 15.4 15.4 15.4 11 84.6 84.6 100.0 13 100.0 100.0

sens itif resis ten Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

(7)

Ciprofloxacin

2 15.4 15.4 15.4

1 7.7 7.7 23.1

10 76.9 76.9 100.0 13 100.0 100.0

sens itif intermediet resis ten Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Ceftriaxone

1 7.7 7.7 7.7

1 7.7 7.7 15.4

11 84.6 84.6 100.0 13 100.0 100.0

sens itif intermediet resis ten Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Cefotaxime

1 7.7 7.7 7.7

1 7.7 7.7 15.4

11 84.6 84.6 100.0 13 100.0 100.0

sens itif intermediet resis ten Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative 13 100.0 +

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Cefepime

1 7.7 7.7 7.7

12 92.3 92.3 100.0 13 100.0 100.0

sens itif resis ten Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

(8)

Gentamicin

3 23.1 23.1 23.1 10 76.9 76.9 100.0 13 100.0 100.0

sens itif resis ten Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Levofloxacin

3 23.1 23.1 23.1 3 23.1 23.1 46.2 7 53.8 53.8 100.0 13 100.0 100.0

sens itif intermediet resis ten Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Meropenem

4 30.8 30.8 30.8 9 69.2 69.2 100.0 13 100.0 100.0

sens itif resis ten Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Piperacillin/Tazobactam

4 30.8 30.8 30.8 9 69.2 69.2 100.0 13 100.0 100.0

sens itif resis ten Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

(9)

Frequency Table

[DataSet5] C:\Users\user\Documents\KTI Dasta 2015\Olah data\Ps.aeruginosa.sav

Amikacin

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 resisten

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Aztreonam

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 resisten

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Ceftazidime

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 resisten

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Ciprofloxacin

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 resisten

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Ceftriaxone

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 resisten

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Cefepime

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 resisten

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Gentamicin

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 resisten

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

(10)

Meropenem

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 sensitif

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Ampicillin/Sulbactam

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 intermediet

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 resisten

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Tigecycline

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 sensitif

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Piperacillin/Tazobactam

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 resisten

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

(11)

Frequency Table

[DataSet4] C:\Users\user\Documents\KTI Dasta 2015\Olah data\Klebsiella pneumoniae.sav

Ampilicin

7 100.0 100.0 100.0 resisten

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Amikacin

6 85.7 85.7 85.7 1 14.3 14.3 100.0 7 100.0 100.0

sens itif resis ten Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Aztreonam

7 100.0 100.0 100.0 resisten

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Ceftazidime

7 100.0 100.0 100.0 resisten

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Ciprofloxacin

1 14.3 14.3 14.3 6 85.7 85.7 100.0 7 100.0 100.0

intermediet resis ten Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Ceftriaxone

7 100.0 100.0 100.0 resisten

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

(12)

Cefotaxime

7 100.0 100.0 100.0 resisten

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Cefazolin

7 100.0 100.0 100.0 resisten

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

ESBL

4 57.1 100.0 100.0 3 42.9

7 100.0 +

Valid

System Missing

Total

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Ertapenem

5 71.4 71.4 71.4 2 28.6 28.6 100.0 7 100.0 100.0

sens itif resis ten Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Cefepime

7 100.0 100.0 100.0 resisten

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Gentamicin

1 14.3 14.3 14.3 6 85.7 85.7 100.0 7 100.0 100.0

sens itif resis ten Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

(13)

Levofloxacin

1 14.3 14.3 14.3 6 85.7 85.7 100.0 7 100.0 100.0

sens itif resis ten Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Meropenem

5 71.4 71.4 71.4 2 28.6 28.6 100.0 7 100.0 100.0

sens itif resis ten Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Ampicillin/Sulbactam

7 100.0 100.0 100.0 resisten

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole

1 14.3 14.3 14.3 6 85.7 85.7 100.0 7 100.0 100.0

sens itif resis ten Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Tigecycline

6 85.7 85.7 85.7 1 14.3 14.3 100.0 7 100.0 100.0

sens itif intermediet Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Piperacillin/Tazobactam

3 42.9 42.9 42.9 4 57.1 57.1 100.0 7 100.0 100.0

intermediet resis ten Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

(14)

Frequencies

[DataSet3] C:\Users\user\Documents\KTI Dasta 2015\Olah data\E.coli Early.sav

Ampilicin

4 100.0 100.0 100.0 resisten

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Amikacin

4 100.0 100.0 100.0 sensitif

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Aztreonam

2 50.0 50.0 50.0 2 50.0 50.0 100.0 4 100.0 100.0

sens itif resis ten Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Ceftazidime

2 50.0 50.0 50.0 2 50.0 50.0 100.0 4 100.0 100.0

sens itif resis ten Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Ciprofloxacin

2 50.0 50.0 50.0 2 50.0 50.0 100.0 4 100.0 100.0

sens itif resis ten Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

(15)

Ceftriaxone

1 25.0 25.0 25.0 3 75.0 75.0 100.0 4 100.0 100.0

sens itif resis ten Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Cefotaxime

1 25.0 25.0 25.0 3 75.0 75.0 100.0 4 100.0 100.0

sens itif resis ten Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Cefaz olin

1 25.0 25.0 25.0 3 75.0 75.0 100.0 4 100.0 100.0

sens itif resis ten Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

ESBL

2 50.0 50.0 50.0 2 50.0 50.0 100.0 4 100.0 100.0

+ -Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Cefepime

2 50.0 50.0 50.0 2 50.0 50.0 100.0 4 100.0 100.0

sens itif resis ten Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Gentamicin

2 50.0 50.0 50.0 2 50.0 50.0 100.0 4 100.0 100.0

sens itif resis ten Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

(16)

Levofloxacin

2 50.0 50.0 50.0 2 50.0 50.0 100.0 4 100.0 100.0

sens itif resis ten Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Meropenem

3 75.0 75.0 75.0 1 25.0 25.0 100.0 4 100.0 100.0

sens itif resis ten Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Ampicillin/Sulbactam

2 50.0 50.0 50.0 2 50.0 50.0 100.0 4 100.0 100.0

sens itif resis ten Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole

4 100.0 100.0 100.0 sensitif

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Tigecycline

4 100.0 100.0 100.0 sensitif

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative 4 100.0 100.0

sens itif intermediet resis ten Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

(17)

Frequencies

[DataSet7] C:\Users\user\Documents\KTI Dasta 2015\Olah data\S.maltoph.sav

Ampilicin

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 resisten

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Amikacin

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 resisten

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Aztreonam

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 resisten

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Ceftazidime

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 resisten

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Ciprofloxacin

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 resisten

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Ceftriaxone

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 resisten

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

(18)

Cefepime

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 resisten

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Gentamicin

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 resisten

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Levofloxacin

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 intermediet

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Meropenem

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 resisten

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Ampicillin/Sulbactam

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 resisten

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 resisten

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Tigecycline

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 sensitif

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Piperacillin/Tazobactam

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 resisten

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

(19)

Frequencies

[DataSet8] C:\Users\user\Documents\KTI Dasta 2015\Olah data\S.aureus.sav

Ampilicin

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 resisten

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Amoxicillin

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 resisten

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Amikacin

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 sensitif

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Aztreonam

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 sensitif

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Ceftazidime

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 sensitif

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Ciprofloxacin

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 resisten

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

(20)

Cefmetazole

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 sensitif

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Ceftriaxone

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 sensitif

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Cefotaxime

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 sensitif

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

ESBL

1 100.0 100.0 100.0

-Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Ertapenem

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 sensitif

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Cefepime

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 sensitif

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Gentamicin

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 sensitif

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

(21)

Levofloxacin

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 resisten

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Meropenem

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 sensitif

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Ampicillin/Sulbactam

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 intermediet

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 resisten

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Tigecycline

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 sensitif

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Piperacillin/Tazobactam

1 100.0 100.0 100.0 sensitif

Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

(22)

Patient

ID Testing Date Organism Name Onset AM AMC AMX AN ATM CAZ CIP CRO CTX CZ DOR ESB ETP FEP GM IPM LEV MEM SAM SXT TGC TZP

609028 8/2/2014 Esch.coli E R R S R R R R R R + S R R R S R S S I

610522 9/23/2014 Aci.baumannii E R R R R R R R R R I R R R S R

616020 8/15/2014 K.pneum.pneumoniae E R R S R R R R R R + S R R R S R R S I

616608 8/13/2014 Aci.baumannii E R R R R R R R R R I R R R S R

617840 8/13/2014 K.pneum.pneumoniae E R R S R R R R R R + S R S R S R R S R

595190 11/11/2014 K.pneum.pneumoniae L R S R R R R R R R R R R S I R

606159 12/1/2014 Steno.maltophilia L R R R R R R R R R I R R R S R

609469 12/30/2014 Staph.aureus L R R S S S R S S - S S S R S I R S S

611338 8/6/2014 Aci.baumannii L R R R R R R R R R I R R R S R

611696 9/17/2014 Aci.baumannii E R R S R R I R R R + S R R S S R R S S

611936 9/24/2014 Aci.baumannii E S S I S S S S S S S S S S S S

618956 8/6/2014 K.pneum.pneumoniae E R R R R R R R R R R R R S R

619931 10/16/2014 Esch.coli E R S R R R R R R R R R S S R

622877 7/16/2014 Aci.baumannii E R R S R R R S R S R S S

623746 10/17/2014 Esch.coli E R R S S R R S S S S S S

624873 11/19/2014 Aci.baumannii L R R R R R R R R R R R R R S S R

625344 12/2/2014 Esch.coli E R R S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S

628059 9/13/2014 Aci.baumannii E R R S S I I S S S S S S

606356 10/2/2014 Aci.baumannii E R R R R R R R R R R R R R S R

615868 7/2/2014 K.pneum.pneumoniae E R R S R R I R R R + S R R S S R R S I

616055 11/7/2014 Aci.baumannii E R R R R R R R R R R R R S R

620319 9/12/2014 Ps.aeruginosa L I R R R R R R R R S I R S R

617163 9/13/2014 Aci.baumannii E R R S R R R R R R - R R S R R S R S R

610851 12/1/2014 Aci.baumannii E R S R R R R R R R R R R R S R

619455 10/22/2014 Aci.baumannii E R R R R R R R R R R R R S R

611712 8/4/2014 K.pneum.pneumoniae L R R S R R R R R R + S R R R S R R S I

(23)
(24)
(25)

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Considering the differences related to late blight development in plots under the different production systems, it was expected that the optimization effort would indicate

[r]

First, we present the data structure used to organize the input point cloud and perform the detection of holes.. Then, we describe the algo- rithms used to detect the different kind

Penjelasan: Pasal 16 ayat (10) anggaran dasar Perseroan, menjadikan jaminan utang seluruh atau sebagian besar harta Perseroan yaitu dengan nilai sebesar lebih dari 50% (lima

A real-time salient object detection algorithm (Tu et al. 2016), using a minimum spanning tree image representation, is used as one set of information to distinguish the façade

(ELNUSA), one of the leading national company providing energy services, On the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders (AGMS) 2013 reported the performance of the company's

[r]

Jumlah Harga (Rp) Berita Acara