• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

S ING 1002734 bibliography

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "S ING 1002734 bibliography"

Copied!
7
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Wildan Hariz, 2015

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN READABILITY LEVEL OF TEXT MATERIALS AND VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ABILITY IN EFL CLASSROOMS

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

Bibliography

Agustien, H. I. (2001). Setting up new standards: A preview of Indonesia's new

competence-based curriculum. Universitas Negeri Semarang, 1-9.

Akbari, R., Atae, M. R., Marefat, H. (1999). The role of discourse elements in

determining the readability of texts. TESL Reporter, 16-27.

Anderson, N. J. (1999). Exploring second language reading: Issues and

strategies. Canada: Heinle & Heinle.

Artono Wardiman, M. B. (2008). Language in focus for grade IX junior high

school (SMP/MTs). Pusat Perbukuan Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Astika, G. (2007). Readings in language teaching and research. Salatiga: Widya

Sari Press.

Backhoff, E., Larrazolo, N., Rosas, M. (2000). The level of difficulty and

discrimination power of the basic knowledge and skills examination

(EXHCOBA). Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 1-16.

Bahti, T. (2013). Readibility and the holistic approach. Retrieved June 9, 2013,

from http://coerll.utexas.edu/:

http://coerll.utexas.edu/methods/modules/reading

Baker, C. (2011). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism (5th ed.).

(2)

Wildan Hariz, 2015

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN READABILITY LEVEL OF TEXT MATERIALS AND VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ABILITY IN EFL CLASSROOMS

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

Berardo, S. A. (2006). The use of authentic materials in the teaching of reading.

The Reading Matrix, 60-69.

Brown, D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). United

States of America: Pearson Longman.

Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approache to

language pedagogy (2nd ed.). New York: Eddison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Brown, J. D. (1999). Relative importance of persons, items, subtets and languages

to TOEFL test variance. Language Testing, 216-237.

Burns, A., Richards, J. C. (2012). The cambridge guide to pedagogy and practice

in second language teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Calvin D. Catterall, G. M. (1978). Strategies for helping students. Springfield:

Charles C Thomas.

Chaudron, C. (1988). Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and

learning. Cambridge: The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed

method approaches. Los Angeles: Sage.

Croft, K. (1960). Reading and word study for students of English as a Second

(3)

Wildan Hariz, 2015

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN READABILITY LEVEL OF TEXT MATERIALS AND VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ABILITY IN EFL CLASSROOMS

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

Dale, E., Chall, J. S. (1948). A formula for predicting readability. Educ. Res.

Bull., 27, 11-20, 37-54

Darville, R., Heibert, M. (1985). Small chains court materials: Can they be read?

Can they be understood? Canadian Law Information Council, CLIC

Papers on PLEI 6.

Dj., O. S. (2013). Bahasa Inggris untuk SMA-MA/SMK Kelas X. Bandung:

YRAMA WIDYA.

DuBay, W. H. (2004). The classic readibility studies. Retrieved June 9, 2013,

from information.com:

http://www.impact-information.com/classics.pdf

DuBay, W. H. (2004). The principles of readibility. Retrieved June 9, 2013, from

http://www.nald.ca: http://www.nald.ca/library/research/readab/readab.pdf

Gay, L. R. (1987). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and

application. (3rd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.

Githens. (2013). Conversation patterns. Retrieved December 19, 2013, from

http://www9.georgetown:

http://www9.georgetown.edu/faculty/bassr/githens/tannen.htm

Graesser, A., McNamara, D.S., Louwerse, M., Cai, Z. (2004). Coh-Metrix:

Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavioral Research Methods,

Instruments, and Computers, 36, 193-202.

Hall, J. C. (2005). The readability of original articles in medical journals.

(4)

Wildan Hariz, 2015

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN READABILITY LEVEL OF TEXT MATERIALS AND VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ABILITY IN EFL CLASSROOMS

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

Hamalik, O. (2008). Dasar-dasar pengembangan kurikulum. Bandung: PT

Remaja Rosdakarya.

Hasan, S. H. (2008). Evaluasi kurikulum. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Hayden, J. D. (2008). Readability in the British Journal of Surgery. British

Journal of Surgery, 119-124.

Kim, Y. Y. (2007). Ideology, identity, and intercultural communication. Journal

of Intercultural Communication Research, 237-253.

Kitchens, S. A. (2010). What’s your communication style: High involvement or

High consideration? Retrieved December 17, 2013, from

http://familyoralhistory.us:

http://familyoralhistory.us/news/view/its_deborah_tannen_day_how_famil

y_communication_can_go_weird#ixzz2o1Cxsd7J

Levine, D. R., Adelman, M. B. (1993). Beyond language: Cross-cultural

communication. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Regents.

Lorch, R. F., O'brien, E. J. (1995). Sources of coherence in reading. Hillsdale:

Erlbaum.

McNamara. (1996). Coh-Metrix: An automated tool for theoretical and applied

(5)

Wildan Hariz, 2015

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN READABILITY LEVEL OF TEXT MATERIALS AND VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ABILITY IN EFL CLASSROOMS

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

McShane, S. (2005). Applying research in reading instruction for adults.

Retrieved June 29, 2014, from https://lincs.ed.gov:

https://lincs.ed.gov/publications/html/mcshane/index.html.

Meador, D. (2013). Readibility. Retrieved June 9, 2013, from

http://teaching.about.com/: http://teaching.about.com/.

NCS Pearson. (2014). Pearson correlation formula. Retrieved June 30, 2014,

from http://formulas.tutorvista.com:

http://formulas.tutorvista.com/math/pearson-correlation-formula.html.

Nelson, M. B. (2003). You said this, But I heard that. Retrieved December 17,

2013, from http://www.asaecenter.org:

http://www.asaecenter.org/Resources/EUArticle.cfm?ItemNumber=11865.

Otto, W., Chester, R. D. (1976). Objective-based reading. Massachusetts:

Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Partowisastro, H. K. (1986). Diagnosa pemecahan dan kesulitan belajar. Jakarta:

Erlangga.

Patsy M. Lightbown, N. S. (2006). How languages are learned (3rd ed.). New

York: Oxford University Press.

Phelan, C., Wren, J. (2006). Exploring reliability in academic assessment. Journal

of UNI Office of Academic Assessment.

Pikulski, J. J. (2002). Readability. Houghton Mifflin. Retrieved June 12, 2013,

(6)

Wildan Hariz, 2015

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN READABILITY LEVEL OF TEXT MATERIALS AND VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ABILITY IN EFL CLASSROOMS

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

Prado, L., Plourde, L. A. (2011) Increasing reading comprehension through the

explicit teaching of reading strategies: Is there a difference among the

genders?. Reading Improvement, 32-43.

Spache, G. D. (1967). Reading in the Elementary School. Boston: Allyn and

Bacon, Inc.

Stephens, C. (2000). All about readibility. Retrieved June 12, 2013, from

http://plainlanguage.com: http://plainlanguage.com/newreadability.html

Sukmadinata, N. S. (2009). Pengembangan kurikulum: Teori dan praktek.

Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Tannen, D. (2007). You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation.

Retrieved December 22, 2013, from drdouggreen.com:

drgreen@stny.rr.com

Team of Five. (2006). Improving reading skill in English for university students.

Jakarta: Predana Media Group.

Tim Dosen Jurusan Administrasi Pendidikan. (2010). Pengelolaan pendidikan.

Bandung: Jurusan Administrasi Pendidikan.

Wijaya, C. (1996). Pendidikan remedial: Sarana pengembangan mutu sumber

daya manusia. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of

(7)

Wildan Hariz, 2015

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN READABILITY LEVEL OF TEXT MATERIALS AND VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ABILITY IN EFL CLASSROOMS

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

Zakaluk, B. L, Samuels, S. J. (1988). Readability: It's past, present & future.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Mengetahui hasil analisis kemampuan mahasiswa prodi D3 Seni Rupa dan Desain (SRD) dalam menggambar desain busana pada pembuatan Fashion Illustration For

Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa variabel bebas yakni harga dan kualitas pelayanan secara bersama-sama atau simultan berpengaruh positif dan signifikan

MENIMBANG : Hasil musyawarah Guru SDN se-Gugus Dewi Sartika Kecamatan Geyer tanggal 16 Juni 2014 tentang Pembentukan Kelompok Kerja (KKG) Gugus Dewi Sartika Kecamatan Geyer

Peningkatan (Gain) Kemampuan Koneksi dan Pemecahan Masalah Matematik Siswa Setelah Proses Pembelajaran.. Kaitan antara Kemampuan Koneksi dan Pemecahan Masalah Matematik

Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa variabel bebas yakni harga dan kualitas pelayanan secara bersama-sama atau simultan berpengaruh positif dan signifikan

Melalui metode ini, suasana belajar akan terasa lebih menyenangkan karena siswa dapat berinteraksi dan saling bertukar pikiran dengan temannya sendiri yang pada

Pemasukan data sumber daya staf pendukung peneliti dilakukan dengan memilih submenu “ Sumber Daya Staf Pendukung ” seperti tampilan pada gambar berikut.. Jika

[r]