R E T C A R A H C E H T N I D E Y A R T R O P S A E V O L Y L R E H T O M
S ’ T L U O C L I P Y D O J N I T S O R F A N I
N PERFECTMATCH
A SARJANAPENDIDIKANTHESIS
s t n e m e r i u q e R e h t f o t n e m ll if l u F l a it r a P s a d e t n e s e r P
e h t n i a t b O o
t SarjanaPendidikanDegree n o it a c u d E e g a u g n a L h s il g n E n i
y B
a d n a ri M a h ti d E a ir a M
8 0 0 4 1 2 1 6 0 : r e b m u N t n e d u t S
M A R G O R P Y D U T S N O I T A C U D E E G A U G N A L H S I L G N E
N O I T A C U D E S T R A D N A E G A U G N A L F O T N E M T R A P E D
N O I T A C U D E D N A G N I N I A R T S R E H C A E T F O Y T L U C A F
Y T I S R E V I N U A M R A H D A T A N A S
A T R A K A Y G O Y
i
N I D E Y A R T R O P S A E V O L Y L R E H T O
M THECHARACTER
’ T L U O C L I P Y D O J N I T S O R F A N I
N SPERFECTMATCH
A SARJANAPENDIDIKANTHESIS
s t n e m e r i u q e R e h t f o t n e m ll if l u F l a it r a P s a d e t n e s e r P
e h t n i a t b O o
t SarjanaPendidikanDegree n o it a c u d E e g a u g n a L h s il g n E n i
y B
a d n a ri M a h ti d E a ir a M
8 0 0 4 1 2 1 6 0 : r e b m u N t n e d u t S
M A R G O R P Y D U T S N O I T A C U D E E G A U G N A L H S I L G N E
N O I T A C U D E S T R A D N A E G A U G N A L F O T N E M T R A P E D
N O I T A C U D E D N A G N I N I A R T S R E H C A E T F O Y T L U C A F
Y T I S R E V I N U A M R A H D A T A N A S
A T R A K A Y G O Y
ii
ii i
v i
:
o
t
d
e
t
a
c
i
d
e
d
y
ll
u
f
e
t
a
r
g
s
i
s
i
s
e
h
T
s
i
h
T
t
s
i
r
h
C
s
u
s
eJ
,
ll
a
f
o
t
s
e
t
a
e
r
G
y
M
t
n
u
a
d
n
a
s
t
n
e
r
a
p
d
e
v
o
l
e
b
y
M
G
3
s
d
n
e
i
r
f
d
e
v
o
l
e
b
y
M
v K R O W F O T N E M E T A T
S ’ SORIGINALITY
e r a l c e d y lt s e n o h
I thatt hi sthesis ,which Ihavew irtten ,doe sno tcontaint hework s
n o it a t o u q e h t n i d e ti c e s o h t t p e c x e , e l p o e p r e h t o f o k r o w e h t f o s tr a p r o
s a , s e c n e r e f e r e h t d n
a as cienitifcpapers hould.
, a tr a k a y g o
Y December 21 th, 2011 r
e ti r W e h T
a d n a ri M a h ti d E a ir a M
i v
N A U J U T E S R E P N A A T A Y N R E P R A B M E L
H A I M L I A Y R A K I S A K I L B U
P UNTUKKEPENTINGANAKADEMIS
m a y a s ,i n i h a w a b i d n a g n a t a d n a tr e b g n a
y ahasiswaUniverstia sSanataDharma: a
m a
N :MairaEdtihaMrianda a
w s i s a h a M r o m o
N :061214008
n a a k a t s u p r e P a d a p e k n a k ir e b m e m a y a s , n a u h a t e g n e p u m li n a g n a b m e g n e p i m e D
:l u d u jr e b g n a y a y a s h a i m li a y r a k a m r a h D a t a n a S s a ti s r e v i n U
N I D E Y A R T R O P S A E V O L Y L R E H T O
M THECHARACTER
S ’ T L U O C L I P Y D O J N I T S O R F A N I
N PERFECTMATCH
a t a n a S s a ti s r e v i n U n a a k a t s u p r e P a d a p e k n a k ir e b m e m a y a s n a i k i m e d n a g n e D
, n i a l a i d e m k u t n e b m a l a d n a k h il a g n e m , n a p m i y n e m k u t n u k a h a m r a h D
y n n a k i s u b ir t s i d n e m , a t a d n a l a k g n a p k u t n e b m a l a d a y n a l o l e g n e
m asecarat erbatas ,
s i m e d a k a n a g n it n e p e k k u t n u n i a l a i d e m u a t a t e n r e t n i i d a y n n a k i s a k i b u l p m e m
a y a s a m a n n a k m u t n a c n e m p a t e t a m a l e s a y a s a d a p e k n ij i a t n i m e m u lr e p a p n a t
.s il u n e p i a g a b e s
. a y n r a n e b e s n a g n e d t a u b a y a s i n i n a a t a y n r e p t a r u s n a i k i m e D
Y i d t a u b i
D ogyaka tra, :
l a g g n a t a d a
P January9th , 12 2 0 ,
n a k a t a y n e m g n a Y
x i O N K C
A WLEDGEMENTS
y m , m i H o t e d u ti t a r g t s e t a e r g y m s s e r p x e o t e k il d l u o w I , ll a f o t s ri F d e v o l e
b Jesu sChrist . Iam very gratefu lfo rHi sguidance un it lnow ,so Ican m i h k n a h t o s l a I . e m it d a b d n a d o o g h g u o r h t e m s e i n a p m o c c a e H . s i s e h t y m h s i n if
a d i u g s i H r o
f nceasl onga s Iilveunit lnow . IbeileveHeencourage smeal o.t Iwould ilket ogivemynex tgrattiudet oDrs .L .BambangHendartoY. ,
, m u H .
M who ha sspared hi sitmet oguidemepaitenltydu irngt hist hesi sw iritng e
v a h o t l u f e t a r g y r e v m a I . s s e c o r
p him a smy t hesi sadviso rbecause he i svery s a h s y a w l a e h e s u a c e b m i h k n a h t o t e k il d l u o w I . e m o t t n e it a p d n a e l b m u h , d n i k
. e m it n i ti h s i n if n a c I l it n u s i s e h t y m e s i v e r o t e m r o f e m it
k n a h t o t e k il o s l a d l u o w
I al lPBI l ecturers fo rshairng t hei rknowledge . y ll a e r y e h T . s e it l u c if fi d d a h I f i e m d e p l e h y ll a e r y e h t , I B P n i d e i d u t s I n e h W
o t e k il d l u o w I . e r e h e g d e l w o n k f o t o l a t e g d l u o c I o s e g d e l w o n k r i e h t d e r a h s
k n a h
t tos ecretariats ta ffsfort hehelp ,hosptialtiyandkindnes .s e
d u ti t a r g t s e p e e d y
M goe sto my parents ,Eddy Bud iSantoso, Endang it
a w o it e
S ,and al lmy relaitve swho alway ssuppor tmet o do my t hesis .It hank g
n o l e m g n i v i g r o f m e h
t -lasitngl oveandcareo fmet hroughou tmyl fie.
i n e H a ir a M d n a i t s i h d A n a k i W a h t a g A o t n r u t s k n a h t l a i c e p s y M
s a s i s e h t y m h s i n if o t e m it e h t ll a e m t r o p p u s d n a d n i m e r s y a w l a o h w i r a s a n s ir K
r u o y h s i n if o t t e g r o f t’ n o D “ y a s d n a l l a c a e m e v i g y ll a u s u y e h T . e l b i s s o p s a n o o s
t I ” . p u e v i g r e v e n d n a s i s e h
x
r e v e e v a h e w p i h s d n e ir f t s e t a e r g e h t r o f m e h t k n a h t I . g n i h t o n l e e f I , m e h t t u o h ti W
. d a h
d e v o l e b y m o t s e o g e d u ti t a r g t x e n y
M firends Ms .Siska ,Diyan ,Jalu ,Ran i , i
r a S . b M , h a n i h P , a h p E , a c s i r P , a i
N and E axn fo rsha irngr emarkablemoment s .
e fi l y m n i m e h t e v a h o t l u f e t a r g m a I . s e c n e ir e p x e d n a
g n it s a l g n o l a r o f s d n e ir f e s u o h g n i d r a o b y m l l a k n a h t o t e k il d l u o w I
e h t r o f m e h t k n a h t I . m e h t m o r f s g n i h t y n a m o s d e n r a e l e v a h I . p i h s n o it a l e r
e w e n d n a g n ir a h
s xpeirences . Iwould ilke to thank to Anessa Efradtia who s i e h S . s e m it d a b d n a d o o g h g u o r h t e d i s y m y b s y a w l a s i d n a e m s tr o p p u s s y a w l a
e h t g n ir a h s r o f n a s u S d n a n a y i D , a i R o t o g s k n a h t y m , t x e N . r e v e d n e ir f t s e b y m
.s i s e h t s i h t g n it e l p m o c n i e l g g u rt s e m a s
k n a h t o t e k il d l u o w
I al lPurikid steachers .They gave me so many o
t o g s k n a h t y M . n e r d li h c e l d n a h o t s e c n e ir e p x
e mychlidren inPurikid sbecause
.s i s e h t y m g n i o d n i r e tt e b l e e f I s e k a m s e t u c r i e h t d n a s e k o j ri e h t h ti w
e v e k n a h t o t e k il d l u o w I , t s a l t
A rybody who make smy day so colorfu l .l l a m e h t s s e l b d o G . e fi l y m n i d a h r e v e e v a h I s e c n e ir e p x e t s e t a e r g e h t r o f d n a
a i r a
i x
T
N
E
T
N
O
C
F
O
E
L
B
A
T
S
E L T I
T PAGE ... i L
A V O R P P
A PAGES ... ii … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … E G A P N O I T A C I D E
D . i v
A T
S TEMENTOFWORK’SORIGINALITY ... v I
S A K I L B U P N A U J U T E S R E P N A A T A Y N R E
P ... ... vi T
C A R T S B
A ... .. v ii B
A STRAK ... v iii S
T N E M E G D E L W O N K C
A ... i x S
T N E T N O C F O E L B A
T ... x i S
E C I D N E P P A F O T S I
L ... x iv
I R E T P A H
C INTRODUCTION ... 1 .
A Backgroundoft heStudy ... 1 .
B ProblemFormulaiton ... 4 .
C Objecitves oft heStudy ... 4 .
D Benefti soft heStudy ... 5 .
E De ifniitono fTerms ... 6 I
I R E T P A H
C REVIEWOFRELATEDLITERATURE... 8 .
A Theoreitca lReview ... 8 .
1 C iritca lApproach ... 8 .
2 Character... 9 .
ii x .
4 Mo itvaiton ... 1 2 .
5 Love ... 1 4 .
B Theoreitca lFramework ... 1 8 I
I I R E T P A H
C METHODOLOGY ... 1 9 .
A Objec to ftheStudy ... 19 .
B Approachoft heStudy ... 2 0 .
C Methodoft heStudy ... 2 0 V
I R E T P A H
C ANALYSIS ... 22 .
A TheDescirpitono fNina’ sCharacter... 22 .
1 Responsible... 2 3 .
2Atrtacitve ... 2 5 .
3 Cairng... ... 2 6 .
4 Loving... .... 2 8 .
5 Cruel... 2 9 .
B NinaFros’t sWay so fExpressingHe rMothe lry Love n
o S r e H o
t ... .. 3 0 .
1 ByTakingCareo fHe rSon ... .... 3 1 .
2 ByArguingwtihHe rHusbandCaleb... 3 6 t
n a d n e f e D e h t g n it o o h S y B .
3 ... .... 3 7 y
B .
4 Lookingf ort heRea lAbuser... 4 2 b
o J r e H g n i v a e L y B .
5 ... 4 3 V
R E T P A H
C CONCLUSIONSANDSUGGESTIONS... 4 5 .
ii i x .
B Suggesitons... 4 6 .
1 Suggesitonf o rFutureResearchers ... 4 6 .
2 Suggesiton fo r the Implementaiton o f the s
s e c o r P g n i n r a e L g n i h c a e
T ... .... 4 7 S
E C N E R E F E
R ... 4 8 S
E C I D N E P P
v i x
S E C I D N E P P A F O T S I L
1 X I D N E P P
A Cove rofJ od iPicoul’t sPerfec tMatch .... .. ……… 5 0 2
X I D N E P P
A SummaryofJ od iPicoul’t sPerfec tMatch……… 5 1 3
X I D N E P P
A BiographyofJ od iPicoutl……….. 5 3 4
X I D N E P P
A SomeofJ od iPicoul’t sNove l……… 5 5 5
X I D N E P P
1
I R E T P A H C
N O I T C U D O R T N I
h c i h w y d u t s e h t f o d n u o r g k c a b s i t s ri F . s tr a p e v if f o s t s i s n o c r e t p a h c s i h T
s i h T . n o it a l u m r o f m e l b o r p s i d n o c e S . c i p o t e h t g n i s o o h c r o f n o s a e r e h t s t n e s e r p
s n r e c n o c d ri h T . l e v o n e h t f o s i s y l a n a e h t e d i u g h c i h w s m e l b o r p o w t s t n e s e r p t r a p
s e h t f o s e v it c e j b
o tudy .Thi spar tpresent sthe objecitve so fthe nove lPerfec t h
c t a
M .Fou trhi spresen tbenefti soft hestudy .Thi spar tdesc irbest hebeneftist ha t a
p , r e ti r w e h
t rents ,and f irend swli lge tatferthey r ead t hi snovel .Thel as tonei s t
e h t f o n o it i n if e d e h
t erm .Thi spar tstate sthe deifniiton so fterm swhich are .
g n i d n a t s r e d n u s i m d i o v a o t c i p o t e h t o t d e t a l e r
.
A Backgroundoft heStudy
3 8 9 1 ( k c i n l o k
S )says t ha tafamliy i sa group o fadutlst ha t ilvet ogether , h
s d n a , n e r d li h c r i e h t g n i g n ir b p u o t e t a r e p o o
c areeverything wtih t hei rmembers . f o s t s i s n o c t a h t y li m a f d e d n e t x e s i e n o t s ri f e h T . s e il i m a f f o s d n i k o w t e r a e r e h T
y li m a f r a e l c u n s i e n o d n o c e s e h T . s r e t s i s r o s r e h t o r b d e ir r a m f o s n o it a r e n e g e e r h t
a f o g n i s o p m o
c father ,amother ,andch lidren( p .26 .)
e l u r e h t y e b o o t s a h r e b m e m h c a e , y li m a f r a e l c u n a n
I so fthe house .A
u o h s y li m a
f ld havet hei rown r ulest odevelop thei rown f oundaiton a thome .The s
e l u
r , especiallyf o rparents, areveryi mpo trantt ob irngupt hei rchlidren .Af athe r e
h t o m a d n
. t s i p a r e h t a o t l e i n a h t a N s e k a
t Nathanie lstatrst o l earn signsymbo lsincehedoe s .
k l a t o t t n a w t o
n I tmake shimexpres swha thei sgoingt ot el labou tevent hough ti s
i jus tone word .Slowl y bu tsure ,Nathanie lbegin sto tel lhi smothe rwho ha s .
m i h d e s u b a
b e l a C , r e h t a f s ’l e i n a h t a N o t s e o g n o i c i p s u s t s ri f e h
T ,and then to Fathe r
a m n a c l e i n a h t a N n e h W . e s u o h s ’ a n i N r a e n h c r u h c e h t n i s e v il o h w n e l
G k e a
e h t a F “ s y a s e h , l o b m y
s r” symbol .Nina concludes tha tCaleb behind he rchlid e
r o m r e h tr u F . e s a
c ,Nina ha sconsu tlaiton wtih Nathanie’l sdoctor .The docto r a
s n i a l p x
e bou tCaleb stiuaitonandt hedocto rsayst ha tCalebi snott hedefendan t s
e d t a h
t ervest obesuspected .Ninareailzest ha tNathanieleve rcome shomewtih t
a h t r a e w r e d n
u edo sno tbelongt o him .N inaphone sPat irck t o i nvesitgatef athe r .
e s u o h s ’ n e l
G Patirck i sa po ilceofifce rand Nina’ sbes tf irend .They have been o
g a e m it g n o l a r o f s d n e ir
f WhenPatircki nvesitgatest hehousebehindt hechurch , h
c i h w , x o b a n i r a e w r e d n u s ’l e i n a h t a N s d n if e
h isf ul lo fothe rclothes .A tfert hat , d
n a a n i N o t s e m o c k c ir t a
P repo tr sthe invesitgaiton resul tto her .atfe rNina F
s e t a g it s e v n
i athe rGlen andsheconcludest hatf athe rGlenhast heconneciton t o .
e s a c s i h t
r e h t a F d n a c il b u p o t d e n e p o n e e b s a h e s a c s ’l e i n a h t a N , r e t a l s h t n o m o w T
e h t n i t n a d n e f e d a e b o t d e k s a s i n e l
G cou tr .WhenFathe rGlencomest oentert he e h t s i s i h t t a h t s k n i h t e h s e s u a c e b n e l G r e h t a F l li k d l u o h s e h s t a h t s l e e f a n i N , tr u o c
r f n o s r e h t c e t o r p o t y a w y l n
o omaman ilkeFathe rGlen .Ninashoot sFathe rGlen s
e m it r u o
r e s u b a e h t t a h t s y a s y r o t a r o b a l n i s k r o w o h w e n o e m o s , e s a c t a h t r e tf
A si
r e h t a F t u b n e l G r e h t a F t o
n Glen’ s stepbrother .Hi sname i sFathe rGywne .Bu t severa l year s ago Fathe r Glen si s ick tha t make s him have bone marrow
e h T . n o it a t n a l p s n a
rt rtansplantaiton make sFathe rGlen have ot w DNA in hi s y
d o
b . tI make sNina beileve stha tFathe rGlen i sthe one who abuse shi sson . n
e l G r e h t a F g n il li k f o e s u a c e
B ,Ninabecome sadefendant .Whent het irali sbeing t
a h t a n i N o t s y a s k c ir t a P , d l e
h theabuser i sno tFathe rGlen because tii sproved s
i r e s u b a l a e r e h t t a h t tr o p e r A N D e h t y
b no tFathe rGlen .Ninai sr eallyshocked d
n
a feel sveryguitly . , tr u o c e h t n
I thej udgedecidest ha tNinai spunishedf ort wentyyearsi nt he e
h t r o f ti d e r c h ti w n o s ir P e t a t S e n i a
M timesheha sarleadyserved .Ther emainde r p
e h t n i s i e h s d n a d e d n e p s u s e b l li w s r a e y y t n e w t e h t f
o robobaitonf ort ha titme . a n i N . r e d l o w o r g d li h c s i h h c t a w d n a e m o h t a r e tt e b e b l li w e h s t a h t s e d i c e d a n i N
c d n a y e n r o tt a t c ir t s i d a r e g n o l o n s
i hoosest obeahousewfie. s e s u b a t a h t s i g n it s e r e t n i s i l e v o n s i h t y h w n o s a e r e h
T actuallycanhappen
e r e h w y n a d n a e m it y n a e n o y n a o
t andevenbysomeonearoundus .Ther esearche r i
h c r i e h t r o f g n i h t y r e v e o d l li w s t n e r a p t a h t s k n i h t o s l
a ldren t o maket hem happy
d n
a have a bette rlfie .Hopefully by reading the novel ,the reader sare able to d e n e p p a h s i ti n e h w e g a n a m o t w o h n r a e l d n a e v i s u b a f o s m o t p m y s e h t e z i n g o c e r
. d li h c r e h r o s i h o t
F m e l b o r P .
B ormula iton
n i t s o r F a n i N s i w o H .
H .
2 ow doe sNina Fros texpres she rmothelry love to he rchlid in Perfec t h
c t a
M ?
.
C Objec itve soft hes tudy
e h t o t d e t a l e r y d u t s s i h t f o s l a o g e h t e r a y d u t s e h t f o s e v it c e j b o e h T
n i d e t a t s e r a t a h t s n o it s e u q e h t r e w s n a o t s e ir t r e ti r w e h T . n o it a l u m r o f m e l b o r
p the
o t s i t s ri f e h T . y d u t s s i h t e v e i h c a o t s e v it c e j b o o w t e r a e r e h T . n o it a l u m r o f m e l b o r p
n i r e t c a r a h c s ’ a n i N t u o d n
if Perfec tMatch novel .Thesecond i st o ifnd ou thow e
v o l y lr e h t o m r e h s e s s e r p x e a n i
N tohe rchlidi nPerfec tmatch.
.
D Benefti soft hes tu dy
e b n a c t a h t s i s e h t s i h t m o r f s ti f e n e b e m o s e r a e r e h
T gained .Fristi sf ort he r
e h c r a e s e r e h t , y d u t s s i h t m o r F . r e h c r a e s e
r can ifnd the meaning o f love , d
n a r e h t o m a n e e w t e b e v o l a y ll a i c e p s
e a son o ra daughter .The researcher can h
t e c a f o t w o h n r a e
l eproblem silkeNinadoe .s i
s r e d a e r e h t r o f s i d n o c e
S n general .By reading t hi snovel ,hopefully t he a f o t w o h w o n k d n a e v o l y lr e h t o m y ll a i c e p s e , e v o l f o g n i n a e m e h t w o n k s r e d a e
r ce
e z i n g o c e r o s l a n a c s r e d a e r e h T . a n i N e k il s m e l b o r p e h
t the symptom stha tmay
s i h n e h w r a e p p
a o rhers ono rdaughte rha sbeenabused.
s ’t l u o c i P i d o J g n it c u d n o c n o n a l p o h w r e h c r a e s e r t x e n e h t r o f s i d ri h T
h c t a M t c e f r e
P novel .I ti sreally suggested tha tthe nex tresearche rcan discus s f
o e v o l y lr e h t a f t u o b
y lr e h t a f y ll a i c e p s e e v o l n i g n i n r e c n o c e r u t a r e ti l n o s i s e h t a e ti r w o t s e c n e r e f e r
. e v o l
m r e T f o n o it i n if e D . E
d r o n i d e if ir a l c e b o t d e e n s m r e t e m o s , l e v o n s i h t g n i z y l a n a n
I ert oprovide
n a s i s y l a n a n
a d forestallf rommisunderstanding .Thoseare: .
1 Character
( s m a r b A o t g n i d r o c c
A 1981), characte ri sa t ype o fa person .Character , n
i d e t n e s e r p s i h c i h
w the nove l i s endowed wtih moral , disposiitonal , and a
h w h g u o r h t d e s s e r p x e e r a t a h t s e it il a u q l a n o it o m
e t the autho r says . The
n a , s e ri s e d , s t n e m a r e p m e t s ’ r e t c a r a h c f o n o it a d n u o
f d moral t ha tare appeared in n
o it c a d n a h c e e p s r i e h t h g u o r h t d e b ir c s e d e r a l e v o n e h
t which i scalled a s
n o it a v it o
m (p .24). ( n o t n a t
S 1965) ,sayst ha ta characteri san i ndividua lperson who appear s l a r o m d n a , n o it o m e , s e ri s e d , s t s e r e t n i f o e r u t x i m e h t o t s r e f e r t i d n a y r o t s e h t n i
r e t c a r a h c r e h t o m o r f t n e r e f fi d r e t c a r a h c e n o s e k a m h c i h w s e l p i c n ir
p (p .17 .)
.
2 Famliy ( k c i n l o c
S 1983 )state stha tfamliy i sa mar ired couple o rothe rgroup o f r o l l a d n a , n e r d li h c f o g n i g n ir b p u e h t n i d n a y ll a c i m o n o c e e t a r e p o o c o h w t l u d a
t s ri f e h T . y li m a f f o s d n i k o w t e r a e r e h T . g n il l e w d n o m m o c a e r a h s o h w f o t s o m
e h T . n e r d li h c d n a , r e h t a f a , r e h t o m a f o s t s i s n o c h c i h w , y li m a f r a e l c u n s i e n o
s i e n o d n o c e
s extendedf amliyt ha tconsist so fgrandparents ,aunts ,unclestha tilve e
h t n
’ r e h t a f s i r e h t o M . e s u o h t a g n i h t y n a l o rt n o c l li
w spatrneri n af amliy .Mothe rwli l e
m o h t a r o i v a h e b ’ s r e b m e m y li m a f l o rt n o c o s l
a (p .26) .
.
3 Mothelryl ove ( tt o c i n n i
W 1957 )sayst ha tbeingamotheri sno teasy .However ,mothelry d li h c r e h o t e fi l r e h s e t a c i d e d r e h t o m a e r e h w n o it i d n o c l a i c e p s a s i e v o
l ren .A
e g n a h c o t s d e e n y b a b e h t n e h w , g n i d e e f s d e e n y b a b r e h n e h w w o n k l li w r e h t o m
a g n i e B . y r c o t s tr a t s y b a b a n e h w e l d d u c o t n e v e r o , d l o c s i t i n e h w s e h t o l c
r e h t o m r e h r o s i h o t r e s o l c s i y b a b a y h w s i t a h T . y ll a r u t a n e m o c n a c r e h t o m
b A . y l s u o e n a t n o p
s abyf eel scomfo trablewhen tii sclosert ohi so rhe rmother .A y lr e h t o m , o S . r e h r o m i h s e v o l d n a s t c e t o r p r e h t o m r e h r o s i h t a h t e r u s s l e e f y b a b
e t o r p o t r e d r o n i d li h c r e h d n a r e h t o m a n e e w t e b e v o l y ll a n o it i d n o c n u s i e v o
l c the r
n o it a u ti s y r e v e n i d li h
8
I I R E T P A H C
E R U T A R E T I L D E T A L E R F O W E I V E R
. w e i v e r l a c it e r o e h t s i t r a p t s ri F . s tr a p o w t o t n i d e d i v i d s i r e t p a h c s i h T
, h c a o r p p a l a c it ir c e r a y e h T . w e i v e r l a c it e r o e h t s i h t n i s tr a p e v if e r a e r e h T
n o it a v it o m , n o it a z ir e t c a r a h c , r e t c a r a h
c , and love . Second par t i s theoreitca l t
s e t a t s h c i h w k r o w e m a r
f he reason o fusing the related theo ire sin analyzing .
l e v o n
w e i v e R l a c it e r o e h T . A
tr a p s i h
T presents the theo ire s o f ciritca l approach , character , e s o h t d n a t s r e d n u o t t n a tr o p m i s i t I . e v o l d n a , n o it a v it o m , n o it a z ir e t c a r a h c
ll i w y d u t s s i h t e c n i s s t n e m e l
e analyzemothelryl oveo fNinaFros ta samothe.r
.
1 Criitca lApproac h
, e r u t a n a f o g n i d n a t s r e d n u n a s e ri u q e r e r u t a r e ti l o t h c a o r p p a l a c it ir c A
g n i h t e m o s s i e r u t a r e ti L . s e u l a v e v it i s o p d n a , n o it c n u
f whichr elatest ohowt or ead d
n
a judge ti .A sone o fthe atrs ,ltierature i ssaid to have estheitc values ;the m
r o f t r a n a s a e r u t a r e ti l o t e s n o p s e
r i scalled the estheitc response and the .
y t u a e b s ti o t s i e s n o p s e r
( r J s d o o W d n a r e g r e b r h o R o t g n i d r o c c
A 1971 ,pp .1- 51 ) ,there are ifve d
n i
k so fciritca lapproaches: the formails tapproach ,the biographica lapproach , l
a r u tl u c o i c o s e h
ti m s n a rt o t s m e e s r e t c a r a h c a t a h t y ti s n e t n i l a n o s r e p e h t d n a s e r u g if n i a tr e
c p( p .
6 8 - )8 . 8
y r a n i g a m i e h t f o n o it a e r c e h
T person t ha twli lexis tand become rea lfo r l
a c s i r e d a e r e h
t led characteirzaiton (Holman & Harmon , 1986 , p. 81) . t o n n a c l e v o n e h t ti t u o h ti w e s u a c e b t n a tr o p m i y r e v s i l e v o n a n i n o it a z ir e t c a r a h C
e t c a r a h c e h t e k a m o t e l o r t n a tr o p m i n a s a h r o h t u a n A . d a e r e
b r sinside nove l
.l a e r d n a e fi l e m o c e b
.
b Way so fCharacte irzaiton
r o f e v il a e r o m d n a e l b a d n a t s r e d n u e r o m e b r e t c a r a h c e h t e k a m o t r e d r o n I
a s e k a t r o h t u a n a , s r e d a e
r few way s o fi t(Murphy ,1972 , pp . 11 -6 171) . A :
y b d o o t s r e d n u e b n a c r e t c a r a h c
l a n o s r e P )
1 Desc irp iton
, n i k s , ri a h s a h c u s r e t c a r a h c e h t m o r f e c n a r a e p p a l a c i s y h p e h t s n i a l p x e t I
. c t e d n a , t h g i e h , s e y e
r e h t o n a y b n e e s s a r e t c a r a h C ) 2
e b n a c t I . r e t c a r a h c r e h t o n a y b d e n i a l p x e s i h c i h w r e t c a r a h c a s n i a l p x e t I
a r a h c r e h t o m o r
f cters ’opinionor ep rsona lappearances ucha shai,rs kin ,eyes ,and .t
h g i e h
h c e e p S ) 3
n e e w t e b n o it a s r e v n o c e h t h g u o r h t n w o n k e b o s l a n a c r e t c a r a h c e h T
. l e v o n e h t e d i s n i s r e t c a r a h
c So, t hereade rcan know deepe rabout t hecharacter s e
c u d o r p e r a h c i h w s e h c e e p s g n i d n a t s r e d n u y
h w o h s o t g n i h t y r e v e o d l li w n a m A . e s r e v i n u s i h t o t e v o l d n a , n a m o
w isl ovet oa
L . s e k il e h n a m o
w ove i sno ta natura lkind o ra substance o fan absrtac tkind . d
n a s e v o l n o s r e p a y a d y r e v
E isl ovedbu theors hecans tli lproves whatl ovei s .A l
e e f n a c n o s r e
p tha tsomeone love he ro rno tfrom the way she o rhe doe s .
g n i h t e m o
s I faperson l ove ssomeone ,i twli lbeshown byhi so rhe ratttiudeand 0
1 0 2 , s n e y u N ( r o i v a h e
b ,pp .1-3)
( m m o r F o t g n i d r o c c
A 1956), love i san ar twhich should be understood e
l p o e p t u b , d e d n e f e d d n
a n aow day stend to watch ,hear, and do anything wtih e
v o
l .Someone wli ldo anything to be loved .A man wli lbe a irch man ,b e a e
v a h d n a , n a m s s e c c u
s an authortiy to atrtac twoman meanwhlie a woman wli l a
h vebody rteatmen tandgoodl ookingtoatrtac tman p( p 1 . - .)4 s
e m a
J (2010 , p . 2 ) say s tha t love i s mysteirous , magical , complex , s
i e v o L . l a n o it a ri p s n i d n a , tl u c if fi
d universal expeirenceand everyone wli lhave s
i e v o L . e n o e m o s e v o l o t y a w t n e r e f fi d d n a e v o l t n e r e f fi
d aconneciton between
e l p o e p o w
t who rtus teachothe rands hareanythingt hatt heywantt ogether. Therearet wot ype sofl ove .Thef ris tonei spassionatel ovewhich i svery
ll a d n a , l a u s n e s , e s n e t n
i -consuming .Thes econdonei scompassionatel ove ,which . m e h t h ti w e b o t g n it n a w d n a , g n it s u rt l a u t u m , e n o e m o s g n i k il , p i h s d n e ir f s e d u l c n i
l p m a x e e h t f o e n
O e soft hisl ove i sl ovebetween mothe rand he rchlid which i s d
e ll a
c mothelryl ove (Kasschaua sctiedi nHatifeld ,1995 ,p .341-343 .) e
v o L y lr e h t o M . a
s ’ r e h t o m e c a l p e r n a c o h w e n o o n s i e r e h T . g n it s a lr e v e s i r e h t o m a f o e v o L . e v o
e n o d s i g n i d e e
f bymany dfiferen tpeople,t hei nfan twli lneve rdevelopasenseo f a d n a r e h t o m a n e e w t e b e v o l y lr e h t o m A . e v o l o t n r a e l r e v e n l li w d n a t n e m h c a tt a
b f o r e w o p e h T . g n i h t s i h t m o r f tl i u b s i d li h
c elongingcomesf romt hi smoment. There are some characte irsitc so rway sof a mothe rto show he rlove
p , 3 9 9 1 , k c ir t a p z ti F & r e ll o N
( p . 81 -9 202) .Frist i sbaby t alk .Thi spar tsays t ha t d
n a t n a n g e r p s i r e h t o m a n e h w s n i g e b k l a t y b a
b her i nfant i son six-month age . r
e h o t k l a t o t d n e t l li w e h
S infant .Commonly ,a mother wli ltalk to her infan t g n i s s e r p x e , l a v o r p p a g n i w o h s , n o it n e tt a g n it c a rt t a g n i d u l c n i s n o it a u ti s r u o f t u o b a
o f m o c g n i s s e r p x e d n a , n o it i b i h o r
p tr .Theseway smakeamotherge tclosert o he r T
. d li h
c hrough baby talk ,an infan tand a mothe rwli lhave specia lconneciton . i
,t n a n g e r p s i r e h t o m a n e h
W ti svery i mpo tran tfo rherto haveposiitvefeeilng s ti
s o p s ’ d li h c e h t e s u a c e
b ivei nvolvemen tand expression so fhappines sarer elated .s
g n il e e f e v it i s o p s ’ r e h t o m e h t o t
s ’ r e h t o m a s i d n o c e
S own attachmen tstyle .I tsayst ha tevery mothe rha s s u o i x n a , r e h t o m e r u c e s o t n i d e d i v i d s i tr a p s i h T . y li m a f r i e h t n i e l u r n w o r i e h
t
-n e l a v i b m
a tmother ,and avoidan tmother .A securemothert endst o besupporitve h
d n
a elpfu lin interaciton swtih he rchlidren and behave in way stha tpromote n
A . g n i n r a e
l na xious-ambivalen tmothe rtend sto be conrtolilng bu tconfusing , r
e h d n
a chlidrent endt obel es saffecitonateandmorenegaitve,l es scompilan tand A
. t n e t s i s r e
p navoidan tmothert endst obemoreanxiou sandl a cko fatteniton . t
a r c o m e d s i d ri h
T ic mother .Thi stype o fmothe ri smore ilkely to use t c e ri d e s u o t y l e k il s s e l d n a s r e h t o m r e h t o n a h t s e v it n e c n i e v it i s o p d n a s n o it s e g g u s
s t n e m e c r o f n e l a c i s y h p , s d n a m m o
li h c e h t f o e d i s t u o t o n s i e v o l s i h ; ti f o k r o
w d’ sconrto la smothelryl ovei s( pp 0 . -9 )
3 9
.
B Theoreitca lFramework
e h T . h c a o r p p a l a c i g o l o h c y s p e h t s e s u r e h c r a e s e r e h t , y d u t s s i h t n I
s m e l b o r p e h t g n ir e w s n a d n a g n i z y l a n a r o f y r a s s e c e n s i h c a o r p p a l a c i g o l o h c y s p
e h T . n o it i d n o c l a c i g o l o h c y s p s ’ e n o e m o s h ti w s l a e d t i e s u a c e b d e t a l u m r o f
a n i N f o e v o l y lr e h t o m s e s o o h c r e h c r a e s e
r fros tin Jod iPicoul’t sPerfec tMatch y li m a f e h t d n a l e v o n e h t n i r e t c a r a h c r o j a m e h t s s u c s i d l li w r e h c r a e s e r e h t e s u a c e b
. n o s a d n a r e h t o m a n e e w t e b p i h s n o it a l e r e h t s i t a h t n o it a l e
r
d n a e l k n e H d n a s m a r b A y b r e t c a r a h c f o y r o e h t e h t s e s u r e h c r a e s e r e h
T the
o t d e s u e r a s e ir o e h t e s o h T . ir t e P d n a , n e k i A , tt i u H y b n o it a z ir e t c a r a h c f o y r o e h t
, e v o l y lr e h t o m , e v o l e r a s e ir o e h t r e h t O . t s o r F a n i N f o s c it s ir e t c a r a h c e h t t u o d n if
e h t e z y l a n a o t d e s u e r a s e ir o e h t e s o h T . ti n i n o s ir a p m o c e h t s a e v o l y lr e h t a f d n a
r a h
f o h c a o r p p A .
B et h Study
( s d o o W d n a r e g r e b r h o R o t g n i d r o c c
A 1971), thereare ifvekind so fciritca l o i c o s e h t , h c a o r p p a l a c i h p a r g o i b e h t , h c a o r p p a t s il a m r o f e h t e r a e s o h t s e h c a o r p p a
l a r u tl u
c -histo irca l approach , the mythopeic approach , and the psychologica l h
c a o r p p
a p( p 1 . -1 5 .)
r e h c r a e s e r e h t , y d u t s s i h t n
I used thepsychologica lapproachbecause tii s m e l b o r p e h t n i d e t a t s s a s n o it s e u q h c r a e s e r e h t r e w s n a d n a e z y l a n a o t y r a s s e c e n
. n o it a l u m r o
f The psychologica l approach i s an approach tha t deal s wtih e
m o s f o y g o l o h c y s
p one to understand the ltierary works .Thi sapproach use s n
a m n i a l p x e o t y g o l o h c y s p f o s e ir o e h
t ’ so rwoman’ scapactiyf o rcreaitonandt he .
r o i v a h e b d n a n o it a v it o m , t h g u o h t r e h r o s i h f o y ti x e l p m o
c By using the
y lr e h t o m f o y d u t s e h t , h c a o r p p a l a c i g o l o h c y s
p love can be analyzed t hrough t he .r
o i v a h e b d n a , t h g u o h t ,s e it il a n o s r e p s ’ r e t c a r a h
c
.C Methodoft heStudy
y d u t s s i h t n
I ,the researcher used ilbrary research method .Thi smethod r
o t e n o s e ri u q e
r ead book a sthe data and source na d then apply some patr so f h
c i h w , m e h
t approp iratef ort heanalysi .s
. l e v o n e h t e z y l a n a o t r e d r o n i d e il p p a e r e w h c i h w s p e t s e m o s e r e w e r e h T
d a e r s a w p e t s t s ri f e h
T ing t henovel t o help t her esearcherunderstand t heplo to r e
h t d n a l e v o n e h t f o y r o t s e h
t subjectt ha twa sdiscussedi nt hist hesis .Thesecond t a h t l e v o n e h t m o r f n e k a t s a w h c i h w c i p o t g n it s e r e t n i t s o m e h t g n it c e l e s s a w p e t s
s a h c u s s e c n e r e f e r m o r f n o it a m r o f n i e h t g n it c e ll o c s a w p e t s d ri h t e h T
k r o w y r a r e ti l n o s k o o
b sand othe rsource sfrom internet .These reference swere e h t d n a c i p o t e h t n e e w t e b n o it a l e r e h t ,s a h c u s s t n i o p t n a tr o p m i e m o s d n if o t d e s u
.r o h t u a e h t f o y h p a r g o i b e h t d n a , l e v o n e h t f o s t n e m e l e e h t ,s k r o w y r a r e ti l
t l e v o n e h t g n i z y l a n a s a w p e t s t s a l e h
T o answe rthe research quesiton s .
1 2
V I R E T P A H C
S I S Y L A N A
r e t p a h c s i h
T i sdividedintot wopatrs .Thefris tpar tdesc irbe sNinaFros’t s s
r e t c a r a h
c itcs .Thes econdpar tdiscusse showNinaexpresse she rmothelryl ove to d
li h c r e
h inPerfec tMatch.
.
A TheDescrip itono fNinaFrost.
A characteri sa person presented i n adramaitco rnarraitvework ,who i s w
d e s s e l b g n i e b s a s r e d a e r e h t y b d e t e r p r e t n
i tih moral , disposiitonal , and y
a s r o h t u a e h t t a h w h g u o r h t d e s s e r p x e e r a t a h t s e it il a u q l a n o it o m
e (Abrams ,1981 ,
pp 3 . - )2 25 .One of t he charactersi n Jody Picoul’t sPerfec tMatch i sNinaFrost . l
a e r a n i r e h t o m a s a y ll a i c e p s e n o s r e p a s a y lr a li m i s s t c a e h
S lfie .
The main character splay impo tran trole in a novel .Thei raciton sreally y
r o t s e h t t n e s e r p e
r .Character sareclassiifed i ntomajo randsecondarycharacters . (
e l k n e H n o d e s a
B 1977) ,NinaFrosti st hemajo rcharacteri nPe frec tMatchnove l e
s u a c e
b she ha sa dominan trole i n t henove land o tfen appears i n al lscenes ro tr
a
p s .Fu trhermore ,character sarealso catego irzed i nto lfa tand round characters p
( p 6 . - )8 88 .Based on Abrams’t heory (1981) ,NinaFrost i saround o rdynamic x
e l p m o c e r a s r e t c a r a h c r e h e s u a c e b r e t c a r a h
c in t emperamen tand moitvaiton (p . )
4 2 .
Murphy (1972 ,pp .161- 117 )sayst hatr eade rcanunderstandcharacters in .
s y a w e n i n h g u o r h t s l e v o n e h
o t d e n e p o n e e
b pubilc ,hi so rhe rmothe rwli laccompany the chlid .Nina ha s s
i h t n e e s y d a e rl
a dozen so f itmes when a srtong mothe rwho simply goe sto h
c r a t s e k il , s e c e i
p e dsheett ha tmetlsa tabreatho fsteamwhenhercaseha sbeen e
s u a c e b n w o d d e s o l
c oft hei nab litiyoft hevicitmt oexplain verywelli nt hecour t ( .p 72 ; 1ch .)
WhenNathanie’l scasei sopened t o pubilc ,Ninaassist shim.Att ha t itme , s
k n i h t y l n o e h
s abou tNathanie landhowshecanprotec the rsonf romt heabuser . t
n a d n e f e d a s a n e l G r e h t a F t a h t s r e d i s n o c a n i
N . Soshoo itngFathe rGlen’ sheadi s n
o s r e h t c e t o r p o t y a w y l n o e h
t . sA a mothe,r i ti she rduty to protec tand be n
o s r e h r o f e l b i s n o p s e
r .She reailzest heconsequence so fhe raciton t ha tshewli l .l
i a j n i t u p e
b However ,Ninadoe sno t rty t or un awayf romt hecourrtoomo rthe n
e v e e r u t a c i d u
j .Sheknowst ha tshedoest hewrongt hingand shewillj ustfiyhe r it
c
a oni nt hecourrtoom( p .1 ; 335 ch .)
.
2 A ttracitve
Patirck i sNina’ s bes tfirend .They have been firend s since they are y d a e rl a s a h k c ir t a P , y ll a u t c A . y ti C e n i a M n i r e c if f o e c il o p a s i k c ir t a P . n e r d li h c
. n e r d li h c e r a y e h t n e h w a n i N d e v o l
Therearemanyt hing sPatirckl ove sabou tNina ,bu toneoft hebestt hing s abou the ri sthe way she enter sa room .stage presence ,tha’t swha thi s d e p l e h , n e h c ti k e m r a h c u D o t n i d e l e r r a b a n i N n e h w t i ll a c o t d e s u r e h t o m
e v i g o t f i s a , d e s u a p n e h t d n a , r a j e i k o o c e h t m o r f o e r o n a o t f l e s r e h
.r e h o t p u h c t a c o t e c n a h c a e s l e e n o y r e v
e Al lPatirck know si stha thi s t
i l e e f n a c e h , n i s e m o c a n i N n e h w d n a , r o o d e h t o t e b n a c k c a
b – a itckle
e h t n i e y e y r e v e s a n o it n e tt a o t p a n s a , k c e n s i h f o e p a n e h t n o y g r e n e f o
. p ( r e h d r a w o t s n r u t e c a l
.Pat irck f eelst ha tNinai sso cha irsmaitc .Pat irckcanf eelt ha tNinaha sa , a n i N g n i e e s y B . n i a g a c it s a i s u h t n e e m o c e b m i h e k a m n a c t a h t y g r e n e f o d n i k
o d n i k a s a h a n i N t a h t s k n i h t k c ir t a P . e r o f e b n a h t r e t h g ir b e b n a c y a d s ’ k c ir t a
P f
h c i h w , d n i m d n a y d o b r e h e d i s n i c i g a
m makes Pat irckenthusiasitc .WhenPatirck e h e s u a c e b e c a l p e h t o t t s ri f e m o c l li w k c ir t a P , r e h t o h c a e e e s o t s t n a w a n i N r o
s n r u t e c a f r e h y a w e h t , n i s k l a w a n i N t n e m o m e h t s s i m o t t n a w t o n s e o d
h g u o h t n e v E . h tr o n e u rt t a s s a p m o c a f o e l d e e n e h t e k il , s i h o t y l g n ir r e n
u Patirck
n e e b s a
h afirendwtih Ninasincet heyarechlidren ,Patirck alway sdoest hesame H
. g n i h
t ewli lcomeearilert o the placej ustt o seeNina walk in and Nina’ sface .
p
( 82 ; ch 1) .I tshow sthat Pat irck really adore sNina .Murphy say stha ta e
t c a r a h
c rcan bee seen by anothe rperson through othe rcharacters ’opinion o r l
e v o n e h t n i s e y e e h t h g u o r h
t .Based on Pat irck’ sopinion ,Ninai sachairsmaitc t c a e h s w o h d n a m o o r e h t s r e t n e a n i N y a w e h t m o r f n e e s e b n a c t I . n o s r e
p s he r
e k a m t a h t e g a u g n a l y d o
b s ve eryone in the room look a the rtoo .Nina ha she r e
b r e n n
i auitest ha tmakes omeonel ooka the.r
.
3 Caring
When Nathanie lbreak shi sarm ,Nina take sNathanie lto hosptial .Nina s
l e e
f badatt ha t itmei fpossibleshehadt o r eplacehi sson’ sarm ,shewoulddo ti . a n i N . tr u h t e g t o n l li w n o s r e h o s f l e s r e h r o , tr a e h , m r a r e h k a e r b y l d a l g l li w e h S
l li
w do everything fo rhe rson .A thi sage ,Nathanie lwli lsay some incorrec t n
e v e t i t c e r r o c l li w e h s , t a h t s y a s n o s s i h n e h W . s d r o
w though Nathanie lwli l
t t a e p e
ll e w e v il d n a y p p a
h . tI show stha tNina really cares he rson and she wli ldo v
e erythingt omakehers onspeakagain .
.
4 Loving
Ninai sal ovingperson .Shel ove she rhusbanda swel la shers on .Shef all s h
ti w e v o l n
i himbecausehei ss rtong .Hi snamei sCaleb .Nina ilke she rhusband’ s y
r e v s i ti e s u a c e b d n a
h powerfu lwhen ti i sneeded and yet i tcan be so so tf .I t s A . e d i s n i d n a e d i s t u o h t o b r e h d n a t s r e d n u n a c o h w n a m a s e k il a n i N , t a h t s n a e m
e n o e h t s i b e l a C d n a y ll u f r e h d n a t s r e d n u n a c o h w n a m a s d e e n a n i N , n a m o w a
h
w ocando tif o rNina( p .8;ch1) .Ninaalway ssays ,“Il oveyou”t ohe rhusband e
v
e ry morning when she goe sto work .She wli ldo i twtih a ltilte kiss in hi s r e h t u o b a g n i h t y r e v e s w o n k a n i N . y li m a f ri e h t n i n o it i d a rt a e k il s i tI . s p il d n a b s u h
s e o t s i h y a w e h t d n a , n ir g s i h f o t li t e h t , d n a b s u h r e h f o h t a e r b e h t e k il , d n a b s u h
s i h n i n r u
t big consrtuciton boot .sI tshowst ha tNinar eally l ove shi shusband ( p. 9 ; 1ch .)
Every night ,whenNathanie lwantst o go t o sleep ,Ninaalwaysr ead sone n
o s r e h r o f k o o
b .Likeanyothe rmotheri nt hi swo lrd ,agood mothe rwillr eada r
e h e r o f e b y r o t
s chlid goest o sleep . tIi salso oneway t hey can ge tclosert oo. I t n
i N t a h t s w o h
s ar eallyl ove shers on.( p. 38 ; 3ch .)
Onenight ,Nathanieli sno ta thi sroom .Ninat ires t o cal lNathanielf rom s
t a h t d e r a c s s l e e f a n i N . r e w s n a o n s i e r e h t t u b , m o o r s i
h omething migh thappen
n o d n a , m o o r y a l p e h t , m o o r d e b e h t n i l e i n a h t a N r o f g n i k o o l s tr a t s e h S . n o s r e h o t
y g e l g n u j e h
r e h l it n u t h g
if las tbloodt ogetj usitceo fhers on .Thus, sheexpresse she rmothelry .s
y a w l a r e v e s n i n o s r e h o t e v o l
.
1 ByTakingCareo fHerSon.
A sar esponsibleandcairngmother ,Ninahandle sNathanie lfromt he itme l
it n u p u s e k a w l e i n a h t a
N he sleeps .When someone decides t o bea mother ,she t
a h t w o n k d l u o h
s whenhersono rdaughteri sgrowingupshes houldl e thers ono r .
n o s r e p t n e d n e p e d n i n a e m o c e b r e t h g u a
d Fromm (1956 )notes tha tpar to fa d
n i e m o c e b d li h c e h t t a h t h s i w e h t e b d l u o h s e fi l s ’ r e h t o
m ependen tandeventually
. r e h m o r f e t a r a p e
s Att heageo f ifve ,Nathanie lcan usehi sownsneakers ,zip up hi sown lfeecej acket ,and pu ton hi sown backpack (p. 21 ;ch 1) . tI i s ilkewha t
k c ir t a p z ti F d n a r e ll o
N (1993 )sayt hat ,ademocraitcmotheri samothe rwho ilke s e s u o t y l e k il s s e l d n a s r e h t o m r e h t o n a h t s e v it n e c n i e v it i s o p d n a s n o it s e g g u s e s u o t
t n e m e c r o f n e l a c i s y h p , s d n a m m o c t c e ri
d s ,andprohibiitvei nterveniton.
Winnicot t (1957 ) say s tha t a love between a mothe r and a chlid s
n e p p a h y l s u o i c s n o c n
u becauset herei saspecia lconnecitonbetweent hem .I talso s
n e p p a
h when Nathanieli st woyear soldandhebreak shi sarm .Then ,Ninaget s d n a m o o r R E f o t n o r f n i s d n a t s a n i N . e s u o h r i e h t r a e n l a ti p s o h e h t o t l e i n a h t a N
r e h t e d i s t u o m o r f l e i n a h t a N t a s k o o
l oom . She hope s tha tshe can replace g
n i k a e r b y b l e i n a h t a
N he rarm t oo .I fshecan do t hat ,shewli ldo i tfo rhe rson . u
h t e g t o n l li w l e i n a h t a N , e r o f e r e h
T r tand feel stha thur t(p.2 ;1 ch 1) .Fromm (1956 )sayst ha tmothe lryl ovei suncondiitona lmother’sl ovet ohe rchlid i norde r
e t o r p o
s ’ m r
a son ,shewli ldo i twtih pleasuresohe rsonwli lno tge thu tr .Aiken ( 1969 ) .
s r o i v a h e b n a m u h m o r f s e m o c n o it a v it o m t a h t s y a s
The term moitve scome sfrom interna lstate o fthe organism which can r o s t c e j b o n i a tr e c d r a w o t r o i v a h e b m s i n a g r o e h t s t c e ri d d n a y ti v it c a s ’ n a m u h d li u b
l a o g d e ll a c n o it i d n o
c s .Hunts ayst hatt herearet wokind so fmoitvaiton .Thoseare c
i s n ir t n
i and extirnsic mo itvaiton (a sctied in Petir ,1981 ,p. 315) .When Nina t i e s u a c e b n o it a v it o m c i s n ir t n i n a d e ll a c s i t i , n i a p s ’l e i n a h t a N e c a l p e r o t s t n a w
. o o t n i a p s ’l e i n a h t a N l e e f n a c a n i N . tr a e h s ’ a n i N m o r f s e m o c
tI i si n t hemiddle oft heday when Ninasuddenly get sa hp onecal lfrom ,
r e h t o m e l b i s n o p s e r a s A . l o o h c s s ’l e i n a h t a
N s oheg se irgh taway t o Nathanie’ls .
t a h w r e tt a m o n l o o h c
s When Nina arirve sa tNathanie’l sschoo,l Mis sLydia , a
h t t e i u q o s s e m o c e b e h t a h t a n i N o t s y a s r e h c a e t s ’l e i n a h t a
N tday and doe sno t
a s a i d y L s s i M . e n o y n a o t k l a t o t t n a
w yst ha tmaybeNinashouldspendmore itme s e k a t a n i N , a i d y L s s i M h ti w n o it a s r e v n o c g n i v a h r e tf A . r e h t e g o t l e i n a h t a N h ti w
i n a h t a
N e lhome .Before they go home ,at the parking lot ,Nina ask sNathanie l h
w at i sgoing on ,bu tNathanielj us tshut shi smouth and shake shi shead. Nina g i b a s i e r e h t fi s a t e i u q s p e e k n o s r e h t u b , k a e p s n o s s i h e k a m o t g n i y rt s p e e k
. t a o r h t s i h n i e n o t s
“Doe syourt hroa thu tr?Shake. “Doe sanythinghu tr?”Anothers hake.
“Dids omethingupse tyouats chool?Dids omeones ays omethingt ha t hur tyourf eeilngs?Canyout el lmewha thappened?....
Nathanie lpatr shi silp s– here ,he’ sgoingt ot el lmenow–bu thi smouth i sahollow,s lien teven.
.
2 ByArguingw etihH r HusbandCaleb
Two o fNina’ scharacteirsitc sare care and love person .Since he rson t o n s e o d e h S . t s ir t a i h c y s p e h t o t l e i n a h t a N s e k a t y lt c e ri d e h s ,l a u s u e k il k l a t t o n n a c
n o s r e h o t s n e p p a h t a h w s w o n k e h s f i o s , m i h o t s n e p p a h g n o r w g n i h t e m o s t n a w
e m m i ti d e p p o t s d l u o c e h s , r e il r a
e diately .On t he day Nina t ake sNathaniel t o a ,
t s ir t a i h c y s
p the docto rgive sNathanie lASL book .From that ,Nathanie llearn s ” r e h t a f “ f o n g i s s e k a m l e i n a h t a N , e r e h t n I . l o b m y s r o n g i s h g u o rt k a e p s o t w o h
. d n a h s i h h ti w
‘Nina! ’Caleb catche smy w irst sand hold smeaway f rom him. ‘ Whatt he ’
? ll e h
‘Youbastard .Howcouldyou ,Caleb?Howcouldyou?’
Hepushe smeaway, r ubbing hi s ifnger sagains thi scheek .My hand irse s b e l a C ’ ,t u o b a g n i k l a t e r ’ u o y t a h w w o n k t ’ n o d I ‘ . d o o G . t n ir p t h g ir b a , ti n o
S ‘ .s y a
s lowdown’.
‘Slow down? ’ Ispi tou.t‘ Il’ lmake tir eally simple :Nathanielt old us .He ’.
m i h o t d i d u o y t a h w s u d l o t
‘ Ididn’ tdoanythingt ohim’.(pp .76-77 ;ch2)
t a h t o d n a c d n a b s u h r e h t a h t e v e il e b t o n s e o d d n a y r g n a a n i N , n g i s t a h t g n i w o n K
r r o
h iblet hing t ot hei rson .Then ,Ninal eave sNathanieli n Dr .Robicaud’ sof ifce , ,
e c a l p k r o w s ’ b e l a C o t s e o
g and ask shim wha the ha sdone t o he rson .Nina i s t a h t s k n i h t a n i N . n o s r i e h t o t ti o d n a c b e l a C t a h t e v e il e b t o n s e o d d n a y r g n a y r e v
o l n i s ll a f e h
s ve wtih the wrong man and he rson does no tdeserve to have d
e c n e ir e p x
e ilke t his .Ninabeileve she rson so much ,so whateve rhe rson says , n
i a l p x e b e l a C . l e i n a h t a N r o f t i o d l li w e h
s severything to Nina tha the does t
o n s e o d a n i N t u b , n o s r i e h t o t g n i h t o
n beileve ti .However ,i tdoe sno twork s
e s u a c e
. h t u rt e h t s y a s n o s r e
h Then ,Nina call sPat irck and ask shim to arres tCaleb p
( p. 47 - 97 ; 2ch .)
Ninaalsodebate swtihhe rhusbandatfe rshebecome sadefendan tbecause i
N , e m it t a h t t A . t s e ir p a g n it o o h s f
o nai si nj ai landa sap irsoner .Sh eha sa irgh t s
ll a c e n o h p o w t e k a m o
t .Shecan phoneeveryoneshe w sant .Nina drieclty call s t
a h w s w o n k b e l a C . n o it i d n o c s ’l e i n a h t a N k s a o t b e l a
C ha shappened to Nina i n
s i e h e s u a c e b t r u o c e h
t there t oo .Caleb asksNinawha tsheha sdonet here and t
a h
w inhe rmind i stha titme .Theydebateabou twha tNinaha sdonei n t hecour t .
y b a b r i e h t s i l e i n a h t a N t a h t s y a s e h s d n
a Shealsot ellst her easonwhysheshoot s e h t m o r f e f a s n o s r i e h t p e e k o t y a w y l n o e h t s i ti t a h t b e l a C s ll e t a n i N . t s e ir p t a h t
. r e s u b
a Nina doe sno twan tNathanie lha sa nightmare every day .She doe sno t l
e i n a h t a N t n a
w to go to a psychiatirst every day .She want she rson to have a normall fie ilkeothers( pp . 91 - 06 1 ; 47 ch .)
.
3 ByShoo itngt heDefendan t
. d li h c r e h o t n e p p a h d a b g n i h t e m o s s t n a w d lr o w s i h t n i r e h t o m o
N Fromm
a t a h t s y a s ) 6 5 9 1
( mothe rwli ldo everything to make he rch lid happy and ilve ll
e
w .Shewli ldo he rbestt o makehe rson happyand ilve well .Nina t hinks t ha t n
e p o s i l a ir t t s ri f l e i n a h t a N n e h w y a d s i h
t e dtopub ilc ,i twli lbet hehardes tdayf o r y
n a m o s e r a e r e h t , m o o rt r u o c e h t t a s e v ir r a a n i N n e h W . r e
h journailstsinf ron to f
i u b t a h
t lding .Theyaskso many quesitonst oNina .But ,shej ustr epilesi twtiha e
li m s g i
b to them .When everyone need sto ente rthe courrtoom by passing the t
o n s e o d a n i N , r o o d r o t c e t e
m o r f n o s r e h t c e t o r p o t w o h s i r e b m e m e r n a c e h s t a h t g n i h t y l n o e h t , e m it t a h t t A
g n it o o h s y b s i n o s r e h t c e t o r p o t y a w y l n o e h t t a h t s k n i h t a n i N . t a h t e k il r e s u b a e h t
e ir p t a h
t st .Nina doe stha tbecause she arleady watche smany case sespecially l a r e v e s r o f t n a d n e f e d e h t n o s ir p m i h ti w g n i d n e n o s r e h e k il s e s a c n o it a t s e l o m
s r a e
y .Then the defendan tcan go ou tfrom jai land do i tagain ou tthere wtih n
s e o d a n i N . n e r d li h c t n e r e f fi
d o twantt ha thappens to he rson again .She want s d
li h c r e h t o e k il r e d l o w o r g n o s r e
h r en wtihou tremembeirng the pas teven t ilke .s
i h
t tIi salsohe rdutya samothert ot akecareo fhers on .
A tfert hat i ncident ,Nina i ssent t o t hej ai lunit lshe g hets e rown t iral .In r
e
h loneilnes sfo rsevera ldayst here ,Ninat hinkst ha tshemus tno tdo t hat .Nina h c n u l g n i v a h , e m o h k c a b e b o t g n i o g m ’ I .t u o t e g o t g n i o g m ’ I “ , fl e s r e h o t s y a s
n k y m g n i g g u H . y a d r e t s e y n o t g n ir r a C r e h s i F d l o t I e k il t s u j ,l e i n a h t a N h ti
w eest o
a w a t e g t h g i m t s u j I e v e il e b f l e s y m t e l d n A . y r c o t tr a t s I , t s e h c y
m y wtih t hi .s”
o t u b g n i h t g n o r w e h t s e o d e h s s w o n k a n i
N nt heotherhand ,Ninar eallyl oves rhe .
n o
s She keep sthinking abou the rson .He i stoo young leaving jus twtih hi s .
r e h t a
f In Nina’ smind ,Nathanie lcire sal lthe itme and want sto see her .She . y li p p a h e v il d n a n i a g a n o s r e h e e s , e s a c s i h t h g u o r h t t e g n a c e h s t a h t s e v e il e b
. p
( 1 ; 464 c ) h
Fisher ,Nina’ slawyer ,say stha tNathanie li sgoing to testfiy .Nina ha s s
i s s a n a e m o c e
b tan tattorney fo rmany years .She know severy step when she t a h t , p e t s s i h t h g u o r h t g n i o g s i l e i n a h t a N s w o n k e h s d n a e s a c n o it a t s e l o m s e l d n a h
. p e t s g n i y fi t s e t s i
Tearsf reezeont he itp so fmyeyelashes . Iwanti tover ,now.I twa swhy I a
d e r e d r u m d a
n r e c n o c r e h s i l e i n a h t a N . e fi l t s e
b now .She want sNathanie lto be asuccessfu l y
a d e m o s n a
m ( p . 8p 2 - 96 2 ; 66 ch .)
Thef ristt ira lo fNina’ scaseha sbeen opent opub ilc .Theagendat ha tday s i e h s t a h t s y a s e h S . n e l G s ’ r e h t a F o t e n o d s a h e h s t a h w t u o b a a n i N g n i k s a s
i a
t o o h s t a h t o d o t e s l e e n o e m o s g n i h c t a w s e k il e h S . e m it t a h t t a e n a s n i ti b e lt ti
l i .ng
o d s e o d e h s t a h t s y a s e h
S ahorirblet hing .Shej us tdoe swha tamothe rshoulddo r
e y w a l e h t , n o it i d d a n I . n o s s i h t c e t o r p o
t fromt heprosecuto ra skstoNina: .s
k s a e h ’ ? o d o t d e s o p p u s e r a s r e h t o m k n i h t u o y o d t a h W ‘
Stayawakeal lnigh twhen an i nfan tha sacold ,asi fshemigh tbeablet o a
e p s o t w o h n r a e L . m i h r o f e h t a e r
b kPig Laitn ,and make a pact t o t alk n i t n e i d e r g n i y r e v e h ti w e k a c e n o t s a e l t a e k a B . y a d e r it n e n a r o f y a w t a h t
. e t s a t ll i w t i w o h e e s o t t s u j , y r t n a p e h t
Falli nl ovewtihyours onal tiltemoreeveryday(p .194 ;ch5) t
a h t s k n i h t a n i
N thequesitoni sverys tupid .Shedoe sno tneedt oanswe rti . y
r e v e t a h t s k n i h t e h
S one in the courrtoom can answe rtha tespecially mothers . e
v o l y l u rt a n i
N s he rson. She wli ldo everything fo rNathaniel .Shej us twantst o f
a s n o s r e h p e e
k e .Ninaha sbeent hroughbadandgood itmes wtihNathaniels ince e v e s w o n k a n i N . l e i n a h t a N t u o b a g n i h t y r e v e s w o n k e h S . t n a f n i n a t s u j s a w e
h ry
d li h c r e h f o l i a t e
d , so rather t han answering t he quesiton ,Ninaj us tkeeps slient . n
o it s e u q e h t t a h t s k n i h t a n i
N doe sno tneedt heanswe rbecauseeveryonearleady .r
e w s n a e h t s w o n k
When givingan explanaiton abou twha tshehasdonet o Fathe rGlen ,she y
r u j e h t o t s y a
s tha tsheshoot sFathe rGlenfo rhe rson ,Nathaniel .Sheexplainst o m
e h
t thatt heymigh tdot hesamet hing ilkehe rwhen t hey arei nhe rposiiton .No t
n a w d lr o w s i h t n i s t n e r a
p to see hi so rhe rchlid being abused .There i sno y
r u j e h t t a h t e e t n a r a u
e r o f e r e h
T ,she consider s ti ,a sfathe rGlen no tfathe rGwynne .She stli lcanno t b
g n i k a h s s i d n a h r e H . ti e v e il e
b ecauseshearleady killst he i nnocen tman .A tfe r e
t a g it s e v n i o t m e h t s k s a a n i N d n a e s u o h r e h o t s e m o c k c ir t a P , t a h
t where fathe r
t a h t r e h s ll e t d n a a n i N s ll a c k c ir t a P , r e t a l s y a d l a r e v e S . w o n t h g ir s i e n n y w G
a tt a t r a e h f o e s u a c e b d a e d y d a e rl a e n n y w G r e h t a
f ck .Knowing tha tnews ,Nina d
e v e il e r s l e e
f andt hankfult oGod t hatt her ea labuse rha sarleadybeen dead .She n i n w o d p e e d , t u B . n i a g a m i h t r u h l li w e n o o n d n a w o n e f a s s i n o s r e h t a h t s k n i h t
. n e l G r e h t a f t u o b a s k n i h t ll it s e h s , tr a e h r e
h She feel sguitly and canno tforgive r
e
h sel fo fbeing such a stupid person .I ti sal lbecause o fhe rcarelessness .(pp . 6
0
3 -307 ;ch7)
.
5 ByLeavingHerJob
The judge decide stha tNina i ssentenced fo rtwenty year sin the Maine e
h t r o f ti d e r c h ti w n o s ir P e t a t
S itmesheha sarleadyserved .Ther emainde roft he a
b o b o r p e h t n i s i e h s d n a d e d n e p s u s e b l li w s r a e y y t n e w
t itonf ort ha titme .Ninai s d
e k c o h
s ilsteni ngtot heverdict .Ninaevent hinkst hewors tpatrt hats hewli lbei n ,
t u B . e m it g n o l a r o f li a
j shei s er allygratefu lwtiht hedecision .
I tha sbeen such abig par to fmef o rso l ong t hatt here’ sno easy answer . l l’ I e b y a M . e ti r w o t e m t n a w o t s m e e s e n o y r e v e k o o b e h t e ti r w l l’ I e b y a M
M . ll a h n o it a e r c e r n w o t e h t t a s n e z it i c r o i n e s o t e c i v d a l a g e l e e r f e v i
g aybe
… p u w o r g n o s y m h c t a w d n a e m o h t a y a t s t s u j ll i w
I Stiitngdownatt he
. e t o n e s i c n o c y r e v a e p y t I , r e t u p m o
c Iam voluntarliy turning in my t
s o r F a n i N , y l e r e c n i S . w a l e c it c a r p o t h s i w r e g n o l o n I ; e s n e c
il (p .385 ;ch
) 9
Fromm (1956 )says, a mothe rwli lsacir ifce everything to make he rson .
ll e w e v il d n a y p p a
