• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Bukti Deduktif Formal Dalam Geometri Dan Implikasinya Dalam Pengajaran

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Bukti Deduktif Formal Dalam Geometri Dan Implikasinya Dalam Pengajaran"

Copied!
3
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Anderson, J. R. (1995).Learning and memory: An integrated approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Brodie, Karin. (2010). Teaching Mathematical Reasoning in Secondary School Classrooms (Mathematics Teacher Education). New York : Springer

Copi, I.M.(1978).Introduction to Logic. New York: Macmillan.

Dahlan, J.A. (2004). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Penalarandan Pemahaman-Matematis Siswa SLTP melalui Pendekatan Pembelajaran Open-Ended. De-sertasi PPSUPI Bandung: Tidak diterbitkan.

Depdiknas. 2002. Pendidikan berorientasi Kecakapan Hidup (Life Skill) Melalui Pendekatan Broad-Based Education (Draft). Jakarta: Departemen Pen-didikan Nasional.

Ekanayake, M.B., Brown, C., &Chinnappan, M., (2003). Development of a Web-Based Learning Tool toEnhance Formal Deductive Thinking in Geometry. Conf. Proc. 26th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australia, 26(1), 302 - 308.

Hanna, G. (1983).Rigorous Proof in Mathematics Education, OISE Press, Toron-to.

Hoyles, C. danKuchemann, D. (2002). Students’ understanding of logical implica-tion. Educational Studies in Mathematics 51, 193-223

Hudoyo, H. 1988. MengajarBelajarMatematika. Jakarta: DepartemenPendi-dikandanKebudayaan

Jacobs, H.R. (1982). Mathematics, A Human Endeavor(2nd

Ed). San Fransisco: W.H. Freeman and Company.

Jonassen, D. H. 2000. Toward a Design Theory of Problem Solving. Educational Technology Research and Development 48 (4): 63-85. New York: Springer.

Jujun S, Suriasumantri.Filsafat Ilmu, Sebuah Pengantar Populer. Pustakan Sinar Harapan, Jakarta, 2001

Keraf, G. (1982). Argumen dan Narasi. Komposisi Lanjutan III. Jakarta: Gra-media.

Kirkley, J (2003).Principle for Teching Problem Solving. Indiana University : Plato Learning

Klieme, E., & Hoinze, A., (2002). Informal Prerequisites for Informal Proofs. ZDM 2002. 34(1), 9-16.

Koedinger, K. R., & Anderson, J. R. (1993).Reifying implicit planning in geometry: Guidelines forModel-based intelligent tutoring systems design. In S. P. Lajoie (Ed.), Computers as cognitive tools(pp. 15-45). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

58

(2)

59

Kusnandi. 2008. Pembelajaran Matematikadengan Strategi Abduktif-Deduktif un-tuk Menumbuh kembangkan Kemampuan Membuktikan Padam ahasiswa (Dis-ertasi). Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Moore, R.C. (1994). Making the transition to Formal Proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27: 249-266.

Maduna B. E. (2003). Formal Deductive Proof in Geometry: Implications for In-structional Practices.International conference on Sri Lanka Studies. Univer-sity of Wollongong: Australia.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) .(1989). Curriculum and evaluation standard for school mathematics. Virgina: the national Council of teachers of mathematics ,inc.

National Examinations and Testing Service, (2003), The Report on Performance at GCE (OL), NationalExaminations and Testing Service, Sri Lanka.

Pedemonte, B. (2003).What kind of proof can be constructed following an abductive argumentation. Proceeding of the third Conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education.

Polya, G (1981). Mathematical Discovery on Understanding, Learning and Teach-ing Problem SolvTeach-ing. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Posamentier, A.S. danStepelman, J. (1986). Teaching secondary mathematics Teachniques and enrichment units. New jersey : Merrill Prentice

Reiss, K. & Renkl, A. (2002). Lerning to prove: The idea of heuristic exam-ples. ZDM, 34(1): 29-35.

Reiss, K., Klieme, E., & Hoinze, A., (2001). Prerequisites for the Understanding of Proofs in the GeometryClassroom. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Volume 4, pp. 97-104.

Ruseffendi, E.T. (1988).Pengantar kepada Membantu Guru Mengembangkan Kom-petensinya dalam Pengajaran Matematika untuk Meningkatkan CBSA . Ban-dung: Tarsto.

Sabri (2003).Prospective Secondary School Teachers’ Conceptions of Mathematical Proof in Indonesia . Thesis: Curtin University of Technology.

Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Berkeley, CA: Academic Press.

Soedjadi, R. 2000.Kiat Pendidikan Matematika di Indonesia. Jakarta: Direktorat Pendidikan Tinggi Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Soekardijo, R.G. (1988). LogikaDasar, Tradisonil, Simbolik dan Induktif. Ja-karta: Gramedia.

SuharsimiArikunto. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: RinekaCipta.

(3)

60

Suherman, E. (2001). Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika Kontenporer. Bandung: JICA UPI.

Suriasumantri, J.S. (1988). FilsafatIlmu. Jakarta: SinarHarapan. Tall, D. (1998). The Cognitive Development of Proof: Is Mathematical Proof For All or Some? Conference of the University of Chicago School Mathematics Project.

The Royal Society, (2001), Teaching and Learning Geometry 11 - 19, The Royal Society, London, UK.

Uhlig, F. (2003). The Role of Proof in Comprehending and teaching Elementary linear Algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics.

Wong, R.M.F., Lawson, M.J., & Keewes, J., (2002). The Effect of Self-Explanation Training on Students’Problem Solving in High School Mathematics. Learning and Instruc-tions, 12, 233-262.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Tetapi sekarang ini kita dapat menggunakan komputer untuk mendapatkan informasi atau berkomunikasi dengan sesama pengguna komputer di seluruh dunia dengan ekonomis, cepat, dan

[r]

[r]

Alat Uji Koneksi ini akan menunjukkan suatu hubungan âbagusâ dengan suatu isyarat akustik, di mana pengujian akustik menjadi pengujian lebih cepat dan lebih mudah sehingga pada

[r]

[r]

Penjelasan Fungsi setiosflags() merupakan suatu fungsi manipulator yang digunakan untuk mengatur sejumlah format keluaran data... Fungsi ini biasa pada fungsi cout(), file

tersebut akan menempati ruang yang kosong dan data tersebut menempati posisi sebagai data. terakhir