• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

T ING 1202410 Bibliography

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "T ING 1202410 Bibliography"

Copied!
9
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

REFERENCES

Abdulkareem, M. (2013).Investigation study of academic writing problems faced by Arab postgraduate students at Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM).Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(9), 1552-1557.

Adjei, S. B. (2013). Discourse analysis: Examining language use in context. The Qualitative Report 2013,18(6), 1-10.

Al Bakaa, A. J. (2014). Investigating the manifestation of textual themes in argument English assignments written by Iraqi and Australian postgraduate students. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature, 3(6), 205-211.

Alonso, S., & McCabe, A. (2003).Improving text flow in ESL learner compositions. The Internet TESL Journal, 9 (2).Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Articles/ Alonso-ImprovingFlow.html.

Alwasilah, A. C. (2007). Pokoknya kualitatif: Dasar-dasar merancang dan melakukan penelitian kualitatif. Jakarta: PT. Dunia Pustaka.

Ballard, B. & Clanchy, J. (1997). Literacy in the university: An antropological approach. In literacy by degrees. The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.

Belcher, D. (1994). The apprenticeship approach to advanced academic literacy: Graduate students and their mentors. English for Specific Purposes, 13,

23-34.

Bitchener, J., & Basturkmen, H. (2006). Perceptions of the difficulties of postgraduate L2 thesis students writing the discussion section. Journal ofEnglish for Academic Purposes, 5(1), 4–18.

Bjork, L., & Raisanen, C. (1997). Academic writing: A university writing course. Lund, Sweden: Student literature.

Bloor, T. & Bloor, M. (1995). The functional analysis of English: A Hallidayan approach. London: Arnold.

Bloor, T., & Bloor, M. (2004). The functional analysis of English: A Hallidayan approach. (2nd Ed). London: Arnold.

(2)

Bruce, I. (2008). Academic writing and genre: A systematic analysis.

London:Continuum.

Butt, D., Fahey, R., Feez, S., & Yallop, C. (2000). Using functional grammar: An

explorer’s guide. (2nd Ed). Sydney: National Centre for English

Teachingand Research. Macquarie University.

Cahyono, S. T. (2012). Textual metafunction in EFL writing: An approach to teach writing. ILTE 8(1), 32-35.

Calabrese, R. L. (2006). The elements of an effective dissertation and thesis. A step by step guide to getting it right the first time. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield Education.

Castro, C. D. (2004). Cohesion and the social construction of meaning in the essays of Filipino college students writing in L2 English. Education Research Institute, 5(2),215-225.

Cheng, F.W. (2008). Scaffolding language, scaffolding writing: A genre approach to teaching narrative writing. The Asian EFL Journal, 10(2), 167-191.

Cheng, X. T. (2002). Cohesion and coherence in English compositions. Journal of

School of Foreign Languages Shandong Teachers’ University, 2(11),

94-98.

Chou, L. (2011). An investigation of Taiwanese doctoral students' academic writing at a U.S. University. Higher Education Studies, 1(2), 47-60.

Christie, F., & Dreyfus, S. (2007). Letting the secret out: Successful writing in secondary English. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 30(3), 235-247.

Coffin, C. (2006). Historical discourse: The language of time, cause and evaluation. London: Continuum.

Creswell, J. W. (2004). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

Crossley, S. A., Weston, J. L., Sullivan, S. T. M., & McNamara, D. S. (2011). The development of writing proficiency as a function of grade level: A Linguistic analysis. Written Communication28(3), 282–311.

(3)

Dalsky, D., & Tajino, A. (2007). Students’ perceptions of difficulties with

academic writing: A report from Kyoto University academic writing courses. Kyoto University Researches in Higher Education, 13(3), 45–50.

Daneš, F. (1974). Functional sentence perspective and the organisation of the text. In F. Danes (Ed.), Papers on functional sentence perspective (106–128). Prague: Academia

Defazio, J., Jones, J., Tennant, F., & Hook, S. A. (2010). Academic literacy: The importance and impact of writing across the curriculum. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10 (2), 34 - 47.

Derewianka, B. (2011). A new grammar companion: For teachers. Sydney:PETA.

Derewianka, B., & Jones, P. (2012). Teaching language in context. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

Dong, Y. R. (1997). Non-native graduate students’ thesis/dissertation writing in science: Self-reports by students and their advisors from two U.S. institutions. English for Specific Purposes, 17 (4), 369–390.

Droga, L., & Humphrey, S. (2003). Grammar and meaning: An introduction for primary teachers. Berry NSW: Target Texts.

Ebrahimi, S. F., & Ebrahimi, S. J. (2012a). Information development in EFL students’ composition writing. Advances in Asian Social Science, 1(2),

212-217.

Ebrahimi, S. F.,& Ebrahimi, S. J. (2012b). Markedness in writing. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(4), 773-777.

Ebrahimi, S. F., & Khedri.M. (2011). Thematicity in research article abstract: A cross-disciplinary study. Educational Quest 2(3),287-292.

Ebrahimi, S.F., &Khedri, M. (2012).The importance of thematic structures in students’ writing cohesion. Language in India, 12(2),64-79. [Online: http://www.languageinindia.com Accessed: September 13th, 2015].

Eggins, S. (1994). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London: Printer Publishers, Ltd.

Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. (2nd Ed). New York: Continuum.

(4)

Department of Language, Literacy and Arts Education, Faculty ofEducation, The University of Melbourne. Unpublished Material.

Emilia, E. (2008). Linguistik sistemik fungsional dan pengajaran membaca dalam Bahasa Inggris. Konaplin 1. Bandung: Balai Bahasa UPI.

Emilia, E. (2010). Teaching writing: Developing critical learners. Bandung: Rizqi Press.

Emilia, E. (2011). Pendekatan genre-based dalam pengajaran Bahasa Inggris: Petunjuk untuk guru. Bandung: Rizqi Press.

Emilia, E. (2012). Module 12: Argumentative writing (a writing course handbook). UPI. Unpublished Material.

Emilia, E. (2014). Introducing functional grammar. Bandung: Pustaka Jaya.

Evans, D., & Gruba, P. (2002). How to write a better thesis. Carlton South, Victoria: Melbourne University Press.

Fang, Y. (2005). Systemic functional grammar and discourse analysis. Foreign Language Education, 26(6), 1-5.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2004). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Freebody, P. (2003). Qualitative research in education. Interaction and practice.

London: Sage Publications.

Gao, W. Y. (2012). Nominalization in medical papers: A comparative study.

Studies in Literature and Language 4(1), 86-93.

Gerot, L., & Wignell, P. (1994). Making sense of functional grammar. Sydney: Gerd Stabler.

Glatthorn, A. A., & Joyner, R. L. (2005). Writing the winning thesis or dissertation. Thousand Oaks: California: Corwin Press.

Green, C. F., Christopher, E. R., Lam, K. M. (2000). The incidence and effects on coherence of marked themes in interlanguage texts: A corpus-based enquiry. English for Specific Purposes, 19(1), 99-113.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.

(5)

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. (3rd Ed). London: Arnold.

Hamilton, H., & Clare, J. (2003). Writing research. Transforming data into text.

London: Churchill Livingston.

Hart, C. (2005). Doing your master’s dissertation. London: SAGE publications Ltd.

Hasan, R. (1997). Ways of saying: Ways of meaning. London: Cassel.

Hawes, T. P.,& Thomas, S. (2012). Theme choice in EAP and media language.

Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11, 175-183.

HE, Y.,& Yang, B. (2014).Translation strategies for thematic progression patterns in English and Chinese. Asian Social Science, 10(4,) 89-90.

Herriman, J. (2011). Themes and theme progression in Swedish advaced learners’

writing in English. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 10, 113-116.

Hill-Madsen, A. (2014). Derivation and transformation: Strategies in lay-oriented intralingual translation. A PhD Thesis submitted to Department of Business Communication, Business and Social Sciences, Aarhus University.

Ho, D. G. E. (2009). Systemic text analysis in the ESL writing classroom: Does it work? Regional Language Centre Journal, 40(3), 333-359.

Hoey, M. (2005). Lexical priming. A new theory of words and language. London: Routledge.

Hu, H. Y. (2008). On textual cohesion in Chinese Students’ English writing. Journal of Zhejiang Normal University (Social Science), 33(3), 113-116.

Hyland, K. (2004). Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 20, 341-367.

Jalifiar, A. R. (2010b). The status of Theme in Applied Linguistics articles. Asian ESP Journal, 2, 7-39.

Jing, W. (2014). Theme and thematic progression in learner English: A literature review. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 16(1), 67-80.

Jing, W. (2015). Theme and thematic progression in English writing teaching.

(6)

Jordan, R. R. (2009). Writing for academic purposes: A guide and resource book for teachers. Cambrige University Press.

Knapp, P., & Watkins, M. (2005). Genre, text, and grammar: Technologies for teaching and assessing writing. Sydney: UNSW Press.

Lim, J. M. (2005). Reiterating and explaining findings: Analysing communicative functions in research reports. Makalah dalam Konferensi Internasional Pendidikan Literasi, Semarang, 29-30 September 2005.

Lores, R. (2004). On RA abstracts: From rhetorical structure to thematic organization. English for Specific Purposes, 23(3), 280-302.

Lu, A. (2013). A functional grammar approach to analyze Asian students’ writing.

American Journal of Educational Research, 1(2), 49-57.

Ma, J. (2001). Thematic progression, cohesive devices and coherence in English writing – Analysis of CET-4 and CET-6 writing papers. Foreign Language Education, 22(5), 45-50.

Martin, J. R. & Rose, D. (2007). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. (2nd Ed). London: Continuum.

Martin, J. R. (1992). English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Martin, J. R., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., & Painter, C. (1997). Working with functional grammar. London: Arnold.

Martinez, I. A. (2003). Aspects of theme in the method and discussion sections of Biology journals in English. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(2),103-123.

McCabe, A.M. (1999). Theme and thematic patterns in Spanish and English History text (Vol. 1) Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School Aston University.

McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (1994). Language as discourse. Perspectives for language teaching. London: Longman.

Meisuo, Z. (2000). Cohesive features in the expository writing of undergraduates in two Chinese universities. RELC JOURNAL, 31(1), 32-35.

Mohamed, A. Y., & Omer, M. R. (2000). Texture and culture: cohesion as a marker of rhetorical organisation in Arabic and English narrative texts.

(7)

Murray, R. (2002). How to write a thesis. Maiden Head, Berkshire: Open University Press.

Naderi, S., & Koohestanian, F. (2013).Thematic structures in conference papers by Persian EFL scholars. International Conference on Knowledge-Innovation-Excellence: Synergy in Language Research and Practice.

Nwogu, K. N., & Bloor, T. (1991). Thematic progression in professional and popular medical texts. In Eija Ventola. (Ed). Trends in Liguistics:Functional and systemic linguistics (approaches and use). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Painter, C. (2001). Understanding genre and register: Implications for language teaching. In A. Burns & C. Coffin (Eds.), Analysing English in a global context: A reader (pp. 167-180). London: Routlege/Macquarie University/The Open University.

Paltridge, B. (2000). Making sense of discourse analysis. Queensland: Gerd Stabler.

Paltridge, B., & Satrfield, S. (2007). Thesis and Ddissertation writing in a second language. A hanbook for supervisors. London: Routledge.

Pecorari, D. (2006). Visible and occluded citation features in postgraduate second-language writing. English for Specific Purposes, 25(1), 4–29.

Qian, Y., Andres, R., & Harman, R. (2007). EFL Chinese students and high stakes expository writing: A theme analysis. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 9, 99-125.

Rahman, Z. A. A. (2013). The use of cohesive devices in descriptive writing by Omani student- teachers. Sage: Sage Publications.

Rahmawati, R. V., & Kurniawan, E. (2015). Thematic progression analysis in

Indonesian EFL students’ thesis abstracts. Indonesian EFL Journal, 1(1),

8-10.

Ravelli, L. (2000). Getting started with functional analysis of text. In Unsworth, L. (2000). Researching language in school and communities: Functional Linguistics perspective. London: Cassel.

(8)

Swales, J., & Feak, C. (1994). Academic writing for graduate students. A course for non-native speakers of English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Thompson, G. (2014). Introducing functional grammar. New York: Routledge.

Vande Kopple, W. J. (1991). Themes, thematic progressions, and some implications for understanding discourse. Written Communication, 8(3), 311-347.

Ventola, E. (1994). Finnish writers’ academic English: Problems with reference

and theme. Functions of Language, 1(2), 261-293.

Wahyudi, R. (2015). An analysis of thematic progression patterns: Opinion section texts of The Jakarta Post. International Journal of Language Studies, 9(3),109-130.

Wang, B. (2014). Theme in translation: A Systemic Functional Linguistic perspective. International Journal of Comparative Literature & TranslationStudies, 2(4), 54-63.

Wang, L. (2007). Theme and rheme in the thematic organization of text: Implications for teaching academic writing. Asian EFL Journal, 9(1), 164-176.

Wang, W. (2015). Newspaper commentaries on the events in China and Australia: A contrastive genre study. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Sidney.

Wang, X. W. (2010). TP pattern and coherence in English writing – Analysis of TEM-4 writing papers. Foreign Language Research, 2, 103-106.

Wei, J. (2013a). Corpus-based research on the development of thematic choices in

Chinese learners’ English speech. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(16), 38-45.

Wei, J. (2013b). Corpus-based research on topical thematic choices in Chinese

and Swedish English learners’ English writing. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(12), 2202-2208.

Wei, J. (2014). Theme and thematic progression in learner English. A literature review. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 16(1), 67-80.

(9)

Xu, R. (2000). Theme and cohesion in the writing of English expository texts by Chinese tertiary EFL learners. University of Wollongong. http:// ro.uow.edu.au/theses/ 1807.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

STUD I TENTANG LINGKUNGAN BERBASIS ICT SEBAGAI SUMBER BELAJAR D ALAM MENGEMBANGKAN CIVIC D ISPOSITION SISWA.. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu

 Untuk setiap pemilik ini, sertakan kopi DNPD prints menunjukan nama dan TIN pemilik  Tunjukkan jumlah pemilik tanpa TIN yang individu (pribadi) dan yang warga negara Timor-Leste:

“B agaimanakah implementasi metode proyek dapat membantu terhadap peningkatan tanggung jawab tugas siswa pada pembelajaran IPS di kelas VII I. SMP Negeri 45

Terlebih dahulu saya mengucapkan puji syukur kepada Allah SWT yang telah memberikan rahmat dan karunianya, sehingga saya dapat menyelesaikan tesis ini dengan judul: “ Hubungan

Penelitian studi efek tepi perkebunan rakyat terhadap struktur dan komposisi vegetasi kawasan hutan Gunung Sibuatan Kabupaten Karo Sumatera Utara telah

katuntasan minimal (KKM) mata pelajaran basa Sunda di SMP Negeri 3.. Sangkan leuwih jéntré bisa dititénan dina tabél 3.2. 4) nganalisis hasil obsérvasi aktivitas

Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Dalam Kelompok Belajar Kecil Untuk Mengembangkan Kemampuan Siswa SMA Pada Aspek Problem Solving Matematik (Studi Eksprimen Pada Siswa

Berikut adalah program yang menerima input dari keyboard untuk merotasi 2 garis... Perhatikan bahwa untuk menerima input dari