• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2019

Membagikan "PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI"

Copied!
137
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

H

S

I

L

G

N

E

E

H

T

L

A

N

G

U

A

G

E

E

D

U

C

A

T

I

O

N

S

T

U

D

Y

E

C

N

E

T

E

P

M

O

C

S

T

N

E

D

U

T

S

M

A

R

G

O

R

P

I

N

C

O

N

S

T

R

U

C

T

I

N

G

T

N

E

M

S

S

E

S

S

A

G

N

I

D

A

E

R

F

O

T

E

S

A

A

S

A

R

J

A

N

A

P

E

N

D

I

D

I

K

A

N

T

H

E

S

I

S

l a it r a P s a d e t n e s e r

P Ful ifllmen toft heRequirements e

h t n i a t b O o

t SarjanaPendidikanDegree u

d E e g a u g n a L h s il g n E n

i ca iton

y B

it n a s u S a w r u P a n o v I a ir a M

: r e b m u N t n e d u t

S 081214070

M

A

R

G

O

R

P

Y

D

U

T

S

N

O

I

T

A

C

U

D

E

H

S

I

L

G

N

E

N

O

I

T

A

C

U

D

E

S

T

R

A

D

N

A

E

G

A

U

G

N

A

L

F

O

T

N

E

M

T

R

A

P

E

D

N

O

I

T

A

C

U

D

E

D

N

A

G

N

I

N

I

A

R

T

S

R

E

H

C

A

E

T

F

O

Y

T

L

U

C

A

F

Y

T

I

S

R

E

V

I

N

U

A

M

R

A

H

D

A

T

A

N

A

S

(2)

i

H

S

I

L

G

N

E

E

H

T

L

A

N

G

U

A

G

E

E

D

U

C

A

T

I

O

N

S

T

U

D

Y

E

C

N

E

T

E

P

M

O

C

S

T

N

E

D

U

T

S

M

A

R

G

O

R

P

I

N

C

O

N

S

T

R

U

C

T

I

N

G

T

N

E

M

S

S

E

S

S

A

G

N

I

D

A

E

R

F

O

T

E

S

A

A

S

A

R

J

A

N

A

P

E

N

D

I

D

I

K

A

N

T

H

E

S

I

S

l a it r a P s a d e t n e s e r

P Ful ifllmen toft heRequirements e

h t n i a t b O o

t SarjanaPendidikanDegree n o it a c u d E e g a u g n a L h s il g n E n i

y B

r u P a n o v I a ir a

M waSusanit

: r e b m u N t n e d u t

S 081214070

M

A

R

G

O

R

P

Y

D

U

T

S

N

O

I

T

A

C

U

D

E

H

S

I

L

G

N

E

N

O

I

T

A

C

U

D

E

S

T

R

A

D

N

A

E

G

A

U

G

N

A

L

F

O

T

N

E

M

T

R

A

P

E

D

N

O

I

T

A

C

U

D

E

D

N

A

G

N

I

N

I

A

R

T

S

R

E

H

C

A

E

T

F

O

Y

T

L

U

C

A

F

Y

T

I

S

R

E

V

I

N

U

A

M

R

A

H

D

A

T

A

N

A

S

(3)
(4)
(5)

v i

Y T I L A N I G I R O S K R O W F O T N E M E T A T S

t t a h t e r a l c e d y lt s e n o h

I hist hesis ,which Ihavew irtten ,doe sno tcontain t hework e h t d n a s n o it a t o u q e h t n i d e ti c e s o h t t p e c x e , e l p o e p r e h t o f o k r o w e h t f o s tr a p f o

. d l u o h s r e p a p c if it n e i c s a s a , s e c n e r e f e r

2 1 0 2 r e b m e c e D 6 , a tr a k a y g o Y

r e ti r W e h T

a ir a

M IvonaPurwaSusan it 0

(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)

ii i v

s il u n e p , u ti a n e r a k h e l O . u p m a g n e p n e s o d i r a d s a l e j g n a r u k g n a y i s k u rt s n i

a r a p ) 1 : a d a p e k n a k u j u ti d g n a y i s a d n e m o k e r a p a r e b e b n a k l u s u g n e m n a i d u m e k

r a n e b k u t n u n e s o

d -bena rmemaham ikesultian pesetra didik (mahasiswa )dalam t

a u b m e

m perangka t penliaian kemampuan membaca , 2 ) seluruh mahasiswa ) 3 n a d , fi t k a o r p h i b e l i d a j n e m k u t n u s ir g g n I a s a h a B n a k i d i d n e P i d u t S m a r g o r P

f it k e f e h i b e l g n a y n a r a j a l e b m e p e d o t e m t a u b m e m k u t n u a y n t u j n a l e s i ti l e n e p n o l a c

e d i n i n a it il e n e p a y a k r e p m e m k u t n u u a t

a ngancaramemperbanyakj umlahsampe l .i

s a l u p o p n a h u r u l e s e k i s a t n e s e r p e r e m h i b e l r a g a

: i c n u k a t a

(10)

x i

S T N E M E G D E L W O N K C A

t s ri

F o fall , Iwould ilket ogivemydeepes tgrattiudet ot heAlmightyGod e l o h w e h t g n ir u d s g n i h t e l b a u l a v y n a m n r a e l e m g n it t e l d n a , g n i d i u g , g n i s s e l b r o f

d e n e p p a h g n i h t e l g n i s y r e v e m o r f n r a e l e m t e l e H . s i s e h t y m g n i h s i n if f o s s e c o r p

v a g n e h t o h w e l p o e p l u f r e d n o w y n a m t e e m d n a s i s e h t y m f o y e n r u o j e h t g n o l

a e

.s i s e h t s i h t o t s n o it u b ir t n o c g i b

, r o s n o p s t a e r g y m o t s e o g n o it a i c e r p p a t s e t a e r g y m , d n o c e

S Agusitnu s

. A . M , . d P . S , o y t e s a r P i d r a

H ,f o rhi sadvice ,comments ,suggesitons ,correcitons ,

e h t s i h t g n it ir w n i tr o p p u s e r e c n i s d n a , e c n e it a p t a e r g , e m it e l b a u l a

v sis . Iwould

k n a h t o t e k il o s l

a V .Triprihatmini ,S.Pd. ,M.Hum. ,M.A. ,fo rvaildaitng my r

o F . t n e m u rt s n i h c r a e s e

r Sr . Margareth , FCJ and my sister- ni - wl - oa t - ,be .

C i t a w a n i L a il li c i r

P P. ,S.Pd. ,M.Hum. , Ithank them fo rproofreading my g

n i n e t s il d n a s i s e h

t tomyhear tdu irngt heproces so f ifnishingt hist hesi .s

l u f r e d n o w d n a d e v o l e b y m o t s e o g e d u ti t a r g d n a e v o l e r e c n i s y m , d ri h T s t n e r a

p Bapak Franciscu s Xaveriu s Suripto and Ibu Vincen ita Yoviniana it

s il u

S fort heril ove ,suppo tr ,guidance ,and prayers . Ideeply t hank my beloved

r e t s i

s Slivia Dw i Puspa Susan it , fo r helping me when I wa s sick and , r e t s i s e lt ti l d n a r e h t o r b y l e v o l y m r o F . t h g i n t a e t a l p u d e y a t s e m g n i y n a p m o c c a

a j a m t A a y r u S f e s o

Y and Gabriella Chrisite Susan it , I thank them fo r w

e m g n it a v it o

m hen Iam down .My deepest t hankfulnes s Igivet o my beloved ,

é c n a

if MatheoRaoldyWicaksono, f orl ovingme ,helpingme ,paitenltywaiitng y l d n i k d n a , s s e lr e w o p m a I n e h w e m g n it r o p p u s , s i s e h t s i h t g n i h s i n if e m r o f

(11)

x n

if e d

I tielyowemuch t o mysupporitngseniors ,MasD iw ,MbakLeonie , d

n

a Kak Lucy fo rthei radvice ,suppo tr ,idea sand opinions .Wtihout t hem ,thi s , t n a tl u s n o c l a u ti ri p s y m o t h c u m e w o o s l a I . t s i x e t o n d l u o w s i s e h

t Mbak

y t n a h S a i s a t s a n

A RumahMOMO ,fo rkeeping me on the irgh t rtack and fo r y l p e e d I . e g n a h c a e k a m o t r e d r o n i e c n a h c d o o g y r e v e e k a t o t e m g n i d n i m e r

, s r o i n u j l a y o l y m k n a h

t Budi , Tika , Dhian , Vian , Nana, Willy, fo r thei r o

t s e o g o s l a s s e n l u f k n a h t p e e d y M . s e e w e i v r e t n i y m e b o t s s e n g n il li

w Rissa ,my

junio randmyboardinghousemate,f o rgivingmeahandevery itme Ineededhe r .

p l e h

, s d n e ir f t s e b y m l l a k n a h t o t e k il d l u o w I , t e g r o f o t t o

N Ika ,Vtia ,Tania ,

s a y i

T ,Dircia ,Venty ,Ratna ,Windru, Nora ,Lia ,and Deby fo rthe love and e

r a h s e w s s e n r e h t e g o

t d . Iwould also ilke to expres smy appreciaiton to al lmy ,

s r e d a e r f o o r p d n a s t n a tl u s n o c s i s e h t l a t n e d i c n i o

c Rean , Adhi , Adam , Bang

y k n a r

F , MasDesta, Dh tia ,Yus ,Yosua ,Octa ,Astri ,Metia ,Seto ,Deils ,andal l tr

o p p u s d n a d n a h a e m g n i v i g r o f s r o v i v r u s I B

P in ifnishingt hist hesis .

d n a e m d e p l e h d a h o h w l l a o t e v i g I e d u ti t a r g t s e t a e r g y m , y ll a n i F

d l u o c s e m a n e s o h w y ti s r e v i n U a m r a h D a t a n a S n i y d u t s y m g n ir u d e m d e tr o p p u s

. m e h t h ti w e b s y a w l a l li w g n i s s e l b s ’ d o G y a M . e n o y b e n o d e n o it n e m e b t o n

v I a ir a

(12)

i x

T N E T N O C F O E L B A

T S

e g a P .. .. . … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … E G A P E L T I

T . .. i

… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … S E G A P L A V O R P P

A … . ii

… … … … … … … … … … … Y T I L A N I G I R O S ’ K R O W F O T N E M E T A T

S … iv ..

I S A K I L B U P N A U J U T E S R E P N A A T A Y N R E

P ………... v …

… … … … … … T C A R T S B

A ………... vi ..

K A R T S B

A ……… i... v i ..

. … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … S T N E M E G D E L W O N K C

A .. x.. i

.. . … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … S T N E T N O C F O E L B A

T .. .. x i

… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … S E L B A T F O T S I

L … . x iii

.. … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … E R U G I F F O T S I

L x vi

… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … S E C I D N E P P A F O T S I

L … vx

N O I T C U D O R T N I .I R E T P A H C

.

A ResearchBackground……… ... .

B ResearchProblem s………... .. .

C ProblemLimtiaiton……… .. .

D ResearchObjecitve s……… . .

E ResearchBenefti s……… . .

F Deifniitono fTerm s……… .. 1 5 5 6 6 8 E

R U T A R E T I L D E T A L E R F O W E I V E R . I I R E T P A H C

.

A Theoreitca lDesc irp iton……… .

1 Reading……… .. .

a TheNatureo fReading………..…... .. .

b Readingi nI ndonesia’ sForma lEducaiton

System……….. .

2 Insrtucitona lGoal sandLearningObjecitve s………… . .

a Insrtucitona lGoal sandLearningObjecitve sa s F

e h

t oundaitono fAssessmen t……..………..……. .

b FormulaitngObjecitve s………...……… . .

3 LanguageAssessmen t……… 1 1

1 1

1 1

2 1

3 1

3 1

5 1

(13)

ii x .

a T heNatureo fTes tandAssessmen t…...… .…… …. .

b Type so fAssessmen t………...…… .… .

c TheP irnciple so fLanguageAssessmen t……… ..… .

4 Competence……… .... .

5 KPE359LanguageLearningAssessmen tCourse. ... .

a TheNature…………...……… ….… .

b TheObjecitve s………...……… .. .

c TheParitcipant s……… .

B Theoreitca lFramework……… 7 1

7 1

9 1

3 3

4 3

4 3

5 3

5 3

5 3 Y

G O L O D O H T E M H C R A E S E R . I I I R E T P A H C

.

A ResearchMethod……….………. .

B ResearchSetitng……….……….. .

C ResearchParitcipant s……….…….. .

D Insrtument sandDataGatheirngTechnique……….……… .

E DataAnalysi sTechnique……… …. .

F ResearchProcedure……… ..… 8 3

9 3

0 4

2 4

4 4

0 5 D

N A T L U S E R H C R A E S E R . V I R E T P A H

C DISCUSSIONS

.

A ResearchFinding s……… .

1 TheFi tfhSemeste rStudents ’Competencei n t n e m s s e s s A g n i d a e R f o t e S a g n it c u rt s n o

C …….……...

.

2 TheStudents ’Dfiifculitesi nConsrtucitngaSe to f …

… … … … … t n e m s s e s s A g n i d a e

R ……..……….. ..…

.

B Othe rFinding s……….………. 6 5

6 5

4 8 85 E

M M O C E R D N A S N O I S U L C N O C . V R E T P A H

C NDATIONS

.

A Conclusion s……….. .

B Recommendaiton s……… 8 8

1 9 …

… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … S E C N E R E F E

R ….………….. 49

… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … S E C I D N E P P

(14)

ii i x

S E L B A T F O T S I L

e l b a

T Page

: 1 .

3 Dataanalysi so fassessmentr ub irc……….. .. .... 4 7 :

2 .

3 Tabulaitono fdataanalysisr esu tl so fthe iftfhs emesters tudents ’ . … … … … … t n e m s s e s s a g n i d a e r f o t e s a g n it c u rt s n o c n i e c n e t e p m o

c . 4 9

: 3 .

3 Tabulaitonoft heparitcipants’s coref o rtiem1 :LearningObjecitve’ s …

… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … y c a r u c c

A ……… 4 9

: 1 .

4 Dataanalysisr esul to fthe if tfhs emesters tudents ’competencei n . … … … … … … … … … … … t n e m s s e s s a g n i d a e r f o t e s a g n it c u rt s n o

c .. 5 7

: 2 .

4 Percentageoft heparitcipants’s coref o rtiem1 :LearningObjecitve’ s … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … y c a r u c c

A . ..… 5 9

: 3 .

4 Percentageoft heparitcipants’s coref o rtiem2 :LearningObjecitve’ s …

… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … s s e n e t a ir p o r p p

A .……... 6 1

: 4 .

4 Percentageoft heparitcipants’s coref o rtiem3 :LearningObjecitve’ s … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … s s e n e s i c n o

C .. .… 6 3

: 5 .

4 Percentageoft heparitcipants’s coref o rtiem4 :Arrangemen to f … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … s e v it c e j b O g n i n r a e

L ..… …. 6 5

: 6 .

4 Percentageoft heparitcipants’s coref o rtiem5 :Conten tVaildtiy….. 6 7 :

7 .

4 Percentageoft heparitcipants’s coref o rtiem6 :FaceVaildtiy…….... 7 0 :

8 .

4 Percentageoft heparitcipants’s coref o rtiem7 :Numbe ro fTask s….. 7 4 :

9 .

4 Percentageoft heparitcipants’s coref o rtiem8 :Objecitvtiy…….… ... 7 5 :

0 1 .

4 Percentageoft heparitcipants’s coref o rtiem9 :Tes tReilablitiy….… 7 7 1

1 .

4 : Percentageoft heparitcipants’s coref o rtiem10 :Easeo f

… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … n o it a rt s i n i m d

A .. .… 7 9

: 2 1 .

4 Percentageoft heparitcipants’s coref o rtiem11 :TimeRequriedf o r … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … n o it a rt s i n i m d

A ..… …. 8 1

: 3 1 .

4 Percentageoft heparitcipants’s coref o rtiem12 :HumanandMate ira l …

… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … s t s o

(15)

v i x

E R U G I F F O T S I L

e r u g i

F Page

(16)

v x

S E C I D N E P P A F O T S I L

x i d n e p p

A Page

:

A Sura tPermohonanI ijnPeneilitan……….. 96 :

B CompetenceStandardandBasicCompetenceo fReadingSkli l………... 98 :

C Bloom’ sTaxonomy……… 01 6 :

D Assessmen tRub irc………. 1 90 :

E InterviewProtocol………. 1 31 :

(17)

1 I R E T P A H C

N O I T C U D O R T N I

h t f o n o it c u d o rt n i e h t s t n e s e r p r e t p a h c s i h

T i sstudy .Therearesix patrst o e

h t s r e v o c t r a p t s ri f e h T . r e t p a h c s i h

t backgroundoft hisr esearch .Thes econdpar t ri

h t e h T . d e t c u d n o c s i y d u t s s i h t h c i h w n i n o it a l u m r o f m e l b o r p e h t s

i d patri st he

s i h t f o s u c o f e h t s e m o c e b o s l a d n a y r a d n u o b e h t s e v i g h c i h w , n o it a ti m il m e l b o r p

s i h t f o s ti f e n e b e h T . c i p o t s i h t f o s e v it c e j b o e h t n o s e s u c o f tr a p h tr u o f e h T . y d u t s

i a t b o o h w s e if it n e d i o s l a t r a p s i h T . tr a p h tf if e h t n i d e n o it n e m e r a h c r a e s e

r ns the

s i h T . s m r e t f o n o it i n if e d e h t s i r e t p a h c s i h t f o t r a p t s a l e h T . y d u t s s i h t f o t if e n e b

. y d u t s s i h t n i d e s u e r a t a h t s m r e t l a r e v e s f o n o it i n if e d e h t s n i a l p x e t r a p

.

A ResearchBackground

e s o t e l b i s s o p m i s i tI . o d e l p o e p t a h t y ti v it c a n o m m o c a s i g n i d a e

R parate

. e fi l s ’ n a m u h m o r f g n i d a e

r Peoplesearch and dig more knowledgeusually from f

o e n o s A . s e c r u o s n e tt ir w d e t a l e r r e h t o r o s k o o b e h

t the recorded media in

, g n i n r a e

l book s rtansfer knowledge to anyone reading ti .In Engilsh language r

, d l e if n o it a c u d

e eadingi soneoft hef ou rskillst ha tarei mpo trantf ort hel earner s .r

e t s a m o t

l li k s g n i d a e r , t c a f n

I play sacrucia lrolein Indonesia’ sforma leducaiton l a n i F l a n o it a N h s il g n E n i s m e ti t s e t l a t o t e h t f o t s o m , f o o r p a s A . m e t s y s

r o n o it a n i m a x

E Uijan Akhir Nasional Bahasa Inggris (UAN ) are reading i

t I . s n o it s e u q n o i s n e h e r p m o

(18)

2 1 0 2 / 1 1 0 2 r a e y c i m e d a c

a pubilshed by Naitona l Professiona l Cerit ifcaiton y

c n e g

A orBadan Standa rNasiona lPendidikan (BNSP)t ha,t f rom ten i ndicator s n o i s n e h e r p m o c g n i d a e r e r u s a e m m e h t f o x i s , s t n e d u t s l o o h c S h g i H r o i n u J r o f

n e e tr i h t ,s t n e d u t s l o o h c S h g i H r o i n e S r o f s r o t a c i d n i y t n e w t m o r f , y lr a li m i S . ll i k s

l l a r o f e c n a tr o p m i n a s i e r e h t , y l s u o i v b O . n o i s n e h e r p m o c g n i d a e r e r u s a e m m e h t f o

educator sto be able to consrtuc t a good , effecitve ,and approp irate reading .t

n e m s s e s s a

e r u s a e m d n a e c n a h n e o t s r o t a c u d e r o f y a w e h t s i f l e s ti t n e m s s e s s A

n g i s e d t n e m s s e s s a d o o g A . ll i k s d n a t c e j b u s n i a tr e c n i y c n e t e p m o c ’ s r e n r a e l

j b o g n i n r a e l e h t s t c e lf e

r ecitvest ha tshouldbeachievedbyt hel earners .Related t o o t s r e n r a e l e h t p l e h y a m t n e m s s e s s a f o t e s a , ll i k s g n i d a e r h s il g n E f o t x e t n o c e h t

e c n a h n

e therir eading competency .A se tofr eadingassessmen tmayalso beused e

n r a e l e h t e r u s a e m o t s r o t a c u d e y

b rs ’ reading competency . Therefore , i ti s o

t s r o t a c u d e r o f t n a tr o p m

i beablet oconsrtuc tagoodandeffecitveassessment to s

s e s s

a o rmeasuret hel earners ’competencyinr eading. ,

s e t a d i d n a c r e h c a e t s

A the iftfh semeste rstudent so fEngilsh Language t

a c u d

E ionStudyProgram( ELESP )shouldknowhowt omakeagoodassessment , s

s a g n i d a e r g n i d u l c n

i essment .The fitfh semeste rstudent sare prepared fo rthei r e

r a e r e h T . s e c it c a r p g n i h c a e t g n i w o ll o

f several teaching courses in Engilsh e

g a u g n a

L Educaiton Study Program o fSanataDharma Universtiy ,fo rexample : Insrtucitona lDesign (ID) ,Cur irculum and Mateira lDevelopmen t(CMD) ,and

( t n e m s s e s s A g n i n r a e L e g a u g n a

L LLA) .Tim Dosen Program Stud iPendidikan a

h a

(19)

3

e s r u o c e h t s n i a rt t a h t e s r u o c P S E L

E -taker s t “o understand p irnciple s o f o

r p d n a n g i s e d l a n o it c u rt s n

i duce good insrtucitona l design fo r hi s teaching s

e s o p r u

p ” (p.89) .Curirculum and Mateira lDevelopmen ti san ELESP course u

o c e h t s n i a rt h c i h

w r -setaker sto beablet o“understandt heNaitona lCurirculum , e h t n o d e s a b s l a ir e t a m d n a n a l p n o s s e l a p o l e v e d o t d n a s u b a ll y s a n g i s e d o t

m u l u c ir r u c l a n o it a

n ” (p.86) .LanguageLearning Assessmenti san ELESPcourse which rtain s the course-takers to understand the theo ire s and p irnciple s o f

t c u rt s n o c o t d n a t n e m s s e s s a e g a u g n a

l a se t o f Engilsh language learning t

n e m e v e i h c a ’ s t n e d u t s s s e s s a o t r e d r o n i t n e m s s e s s

a (p.88) .

r u o c e e r h t e s o h t g n i k a t r e tf

A ses ,the ELESP student shave to take the e

c it c a r p g n i h c a e

t s .The fris tteaching pracitce , in Micro Teaching course ,i s e s r u o c e c it c a r p a s i e s r u o c g n i h c a e T o r c i M . r e t s e m e s h t x i s e h t n i d l e h y ll a r e n e g

h D a t a n a S f o y tl u c a F n o it a c u d E d n a g n i n i a r T s r e h c a e T l l a r o

f arma Universtiy

(FKIP )students .I t rtain sthe student sto be able to “apply the concept sand ” n o it a u ti s g n i h c a e t m o o r s s a l c l a e r a n i g n i h c a e t e g a u g n a L h s il g n E f o e r u d e c o r p

) 0 9 . p

( .Anothert eachingpracitcei sMicro Teaching 2 o ralsoknowna sProgram n

a g n a p a L n a m a l a g n e

P .A step highe rthan Micro Teaching course ,Program n

a g n a p a L n a m a l a g n e

P (PPL)i sat eaching pracitcecoursef o ral lFKIPstudent s h

c i h

w i sconducted by t eachingin ther ea lclassroom o frea lhighschools(p.91) . f o s t e s n g i s e d o t e l b i s n o p s e r e r a s t n e d u t s P S E L E , e s r u o c g n i h c a e T o r c i M n I

e m s s e s s

a n t according to cetrain competence standard and basic competence t

i y rt o t e v a h y e h t , n e h T . r e r u t c e l e h t y b d e d i c e

d ou ttot hestudent swtih t hesame s

t n e d u t s l a e r e h t o t s c it s ir e t c a r a h

(20)

T o r c i M n

i eaching co eurs ,when ELESP student sdo thei rProgram Pengalaman n

a g n a p a

L (PPL) ,they also have the responsibiilites to make some kind so f g

n i d u l c n i ,s t n e d u t s e h t r o f s t n e m s s e s s

a readingassessment . w e h t s e ri p s n i t a h t n r e c n o c a s i e r e h t , y l e t a n u tr o f n

U rtie rto conduc tthi s

. h c r a e s e

r Based on t hewrtier’ spersona lexpeirenceand personali nterview swtih f

o s t n e d u t s d n a s r e r u t c e l e m o

s the Engilsh Language Educaiton Study Program , W

. t c a f g n it s e r e t n i n a s i e r e h

t hen student spracitce teaching in Micro Teaching d

n

a Program Pengalaman Lapangan (PPL) courses ,they face dfiifculite sin g n i d a e r g n i d u l c n i , t n e m s s e s s a e t a ir p o r p p a d n a , e v it c e f f e , d o o g a g n it c u rt s n o c

. t n e m s s e s s

a O tfen, et h ELESPstudent s ifndi tdfiifcutlt odecidewhatt hingst hey y

e h t s g n i h t t a h w , s s e s s a o t e v a

h havet o t estt hestudents .Anothe rconcerni st ha t n

i s e m it e m o

s othe r example s o f reading assessment , even the Naitona l r

e ti r w e h t , n o it a n i m a x

E ifnds ni approp irate assessmen t design to measure s

e u g r a r e ti r w e h t , e r o f e r e h T . n o i s n e h e r p m o c g n i d a e r ’ s t n e d u t

s tha ta steache r

r o f t n a tr o p m i s i ti , s e t a d i d n a

c theELESP studentst o understand and maste rhow g n i d r o c c a t n e m s s e s s a g n i d a e r f o t e s e t a ir p o r p p a d n a , e v it c e f f e , d o o g a t c u rt s n o c o t

.t n e m s s e s s a e g a u g n a l f o s e l p i c n ir p e h t o t

y d u t s s i h

T then wli lanalyzet hecompetenceo fthe iftfhsemeste rstudent s f

o theEngilsh LanguageEducaiton Study Program o fSanataDharmaUniverstiy i n consrtucitng a se to freading assessmen tthrough thei r ifna lassignmen tin

( t n e m s s e s s A g n i n r a e L e g a u g n a

(21)

5

.

B ResearchProblems t s r e v o c y d u t s s i h

T wor esearchproblem sasf ollow .s .

1 How i sthe if tfh semeste rstudents ’competence in consrtucitng a se to f ?

t n e m s s e s s a g n i d a e r .

2 Wha t are the students ’ dfi ifculite s in consrtucitng a se t o f reading ?

t n e m s s e s s a

.

C ProblemLimtia iton

r e t s e m e s h tf if e h t s i t n i o p t s ri f e h T . y d u t s s i h t f o s t n i o p n i a m o w t e r a e r e h T

d n o c e s e h T . t n e m s s e s s a g n i d a e r f o t e s a g n it c u rt s n o c n i e c n e t e p m o c ’ s t n e d u t s

, e v it c e f f e , d o o g a g n it c u rt s n o c n i s e it l u c if fi d ’ s t n e d u t s r e t s e m e s h tf if e h t s i t n i o p

.t n e m s s e s s a g n i d a e r e t a ir p o r p p a d n a

e g a u g n a L h s il g n E e h t f o s t n e d u t s r e t s e m e s h tf if e h t t a h t s e u g r a r e ti r w e h T

a u q e r a y ti s r e v i n U a m r a h D a t a n a S f o m a r g o r P y d u t S n o it a c u d

E ilifed enough to

e h t d e n r a e l e v a h o t d e t c e p x e e r a y e h t r o f y d u t s s i h t f o s t n a p i c it r a p e h t e m o c e b

g n it a l u m r o f f o s e ir o e h t e h t y ll a i c e p s e , n o it a c u d E e g a u g n a L h s il g n E f o s e ir o e h t

o s l a e r a y e h T . t n e m s s e s s a e g a u g n a l f o s e l p i c n ir p e h t d n a e v it c e j b o l a n o it c u rt s n i

e g a u g n a l h s il g n E o t d e t a l e r s e s r u o c e h t l l a n e k a t e v a h y e h t e s u a c e b n e s o h c

g n i h c a e t e h t ,s i t a h t , e s r u o c f o l e v e l t x e n e h t r o f y d a e r t e g o t e v a h d n a n o it a c u d e

d n a g n i h c a e T o r c i M : s e c it c a r

(22)

.

D ResearchObjecitves s

s i h

T tudyi sconductedt or eacht hefo llowingobjecitve .s .

1 To ifnd out t he competence o f iftfh semeste rstudent so fSanata Dharma .t

n e m s s e s s a g n i d a e r f o t e s a g n it c u rt s n o c n i y ti s r e v i n U .

2 To ifnd ou tthe students ’dfiifculite sin consrtucitng a se to freading s

s e s s

a men.t

.

E ResearchBeneftis s i y d u t s s i h

T wo trh studying for i twli lgivecontirbuitons t o t hestudent s f

o s r e r u t c e l d n

a the Engilsh Language Educaiton Study Program ,the future r

e ti r

w s ,andt her eader soft hist hesi .s .

1 TheStudent so fTheEngilshLanguageEduca itonStudyProgram y

d u t s s i h

T contain s related knowledge abou t consrtucitng language t

i , e r o f e r e h T . t n e m s s e s s

a wil l help the ELESP student s improve thei r f

o g n i d n a t s r e d n

u consrtucitng availd ,reilable ,and usable reading assessment .I t r

o f t n a tr o p m i s

i them because they are educated a s teachers . One o f the a g n it c u rt s n o c n i e c n e t e p m o c d o o g a g n i v a h s i r e h c a e t d o o g a f o s c it s ir e t c a r a h c

e h t g n i w o n k y B . s t n e d u t s e h t r o f t n e m s s e s s a e t a ir p o r p p a d n a , e v it c e f f e , d o o g

, h c r a e s e r s i h t f o t l u s e

r the if tfh semeste rstudent sin academic yea r2011/2012 t l u s e r e h t , y ll u f e p o H . t n e m s s e s s a g n i d a e r f o t c u d o r p n w o r i e h t e t a u l a v e o s l a d l u o c

e g a r u o c n e d l u o c h c r a e s e r s i h t f

o the ELESP student s to improve thei r i k s r i e h t d n a t n e m s s e s s a e g a u g n a l f o s e l p i c n ir p e h t f o g n i d n a t s r e d n

u l l in

(23)

7

.

2 TheLecturer so fTheEngilshLanguageEduca itonStudyProgram f

o n o it p ir c s e d a e v i g l li w y d u t s s i h

T the iftfh semeste r students ’ s

e s s a g n i d a e r f o t e s a g n it c u rt s n o c n i e c n e t e p m o

c smen tto the ELESP lecturer .

i s e

B des ,thi sstudy wli lhelp the lecturer sto know the students ’dfiifculite si n f

o s e l p i c n ir p e h t g n i d n a t s r e d n

u language assessment and consrtucitng a se to f g

n i d a e

r assessment .I talso provide sthe possible factor scausing the students ’ .

s e it l u c if fi

d Byknowingthestudents ’dfiifculite ,st hel ecturer swli lbeencouraged e h t p l e h o t r e d r o n i e u q i n h c e t d n a d o h t e m g n i h c a e t e t a ir p o r p p a d n if r o e v o r p m i o t

i c n ir p e h t d n a t s r e d n u s t n e d u t

s ple so flanguage assessment .Lecturer scould also m

e h t p l e

h comprehend how to consrtuc t a good ,effecitve ,and approp irate e

g a u g n a

l assessment ,especially reading .Anothe rbene if tof t hi sresearch i s t ha t e

h

t assessmen t rub irc insrtumen t could help the lecture r to minimize the e

t s e m e s h tf if g n i s s e s s a n e h w y ti v it c e j b u s f o y ti li b a b o r

p rstudents ’work. I ti s

d n a n g i s e d l a n o it c u rt s n i f o y r a m m u s e h t s n i a t n o c c ir b u r t n e m s s e s s a e h t e s u a c e b

.t n e m s s e s s a e g a u g n a l f o s e l p i c n ir p e h t

.

3 TheFutureResearchers s e p o h r e ti r w e h

T tha tthi sresearch may insprie othe rEngilsh Language o

r P y d u t S n o it a c u d

E gramstudentst oconductf utrherr esearchrelatedt ostudents ’ e h c r a e s e r e r u t u f e s o h T . t n e m s s e s s a g n i d a e r f o t e s a g n it c u rt s n o c n i e c n e t e p m o

c r s

h s il g n E r o f s n o it u b ir t n o c e r o m e v i g o t r e d r o n i h c r a e s e r s i h t e s i v e r r o h c ir n e y a m

r o F . d l e if n o it a c u d E e g a u g n a

(24)

h c r a e s e r r e h tr u

f related t o a simliar topict o thisr esearch ,hopefully t hisr esearch .

h c r a e s e r ri e h t g n it c u d n o c n i s e c n e r e f e r ri e h t f o e n o e b y a m

.

F De ifniitono fTerms s n i a l p x e t r a p s i h

T thedeifniitonofs omeimpo trantt erm susedi nt hiss tudy ,

s m r e t e h T . g n i d n a t s r e d n u s i m d i o v a o t r e d r o n

i the deifniitons ,and the b ire f

s n o it a n a l p x

e areprovidedasf ollow .s .

1 Competence

, m r e t n o m m o c a s

A therearemany deifniiton so fcompetence .On some s

i e c n e t e p m o c , s n o i s a c c

o evenmismatchedwtihcompetency. I n f act,t hoset erm s .

s u c o f f o s a e r a d n a n o it i n if e d h t o b n i t n e r e f fi d e r

a Gliber t(1996 )a sctied in

) 6 0 0 2 ( u c s e r o d o e

T deifne scompetence a s“wo trhy performance which come s o

l c o t s t n e m h s il p m o c c a e l b a u l a v f o o it a r e h t m o r

f sely behavior” .Fu trher ,he

g n i y lr e d n u e h t m o r f y l n o d e n i a t b o s i t n e m g d u j e c n e t e p m o c t a h t d e n i a l p x e

e h t ; e c n a m r o fr e p n a m u h f o t l u s e r e h t d n a , t n e v e r o , t c a f , m e t s y s a f o e g d e l w o n k

. n o it i d n o c n i a tr e c n o e m o c t u o g n i n r a e l d e d n e t n

i Thus ,competen tpeoplearet hose e

m o c t u o g n i n r a e l d e d n e t n i m r o f r e p y ll u f s s e c c u s o h

w .

e f fi

D ren t from competence , Richard s and Rodgers (2001) state tha t y

c n e t e p m o

c cont irbutest o t he successfu lpefrormance o fan i ndividual i n doing e

r d n a g n it t e s c i m e d a c a h t o b n i y ti v it c a r o , b o j , k s a

t a lworking-wo lrd setitng .

e li h

W competence focuse s only on the successfu l performance o f desried s

c it s ir e t c a r a h c l a u d i v i d n i f o t e s a s e il r e d n u y c n e t e p m o c , e m o c t u

(25)
(26)

.

3 Assessment

n u l n o r G d n a , n n i L , r e ll i M o t g n i d r o c c

A d ( 2009) ,assessmenti sviewed a s d n a t s r e d n u r e tt e b o t d e s u s i t a h t e c n e ir e p x e r o , t n e m t a e rt , y a w , d o h t e m y n a t s o m l a

e g d e l w o n k e h

t possessed by the learners .Assessmen ti sused t o observe and t o s

e c o r p g n i n r a e l e h t g n ir u d d e n r a e l e v a h s t n e d u t s t a h w e r u s a e

m s . Since

f o t e s b u s a s i t s e t ,t n e m s s e s s a g n it c u d n o c f o s e s o p r u p e h t f o e n o s i t n e m e r u s a e m

i d e t c u d n o c e b n a c t n e m s s e s s a , s u h T . t n e m s s e s s

a n vairou sforms ,w irtten o r

n e k o p

s ,f orma lori nforma,lf ormaitveors ummaitve . r

e ll i

M e tal .(2009 )state tha tan effecitveand approp irateassessmentha s e

r u s a e m o

t thel earning objecitvest o help t heeducator smeasu irng o robserving .

d e v e i h c a e v a h s t n e d u t s t a h

w Beside ,s t herearealso severa lp irnciple so fagood .

t n u o c c a o t n i n e k a t e b o t t n e m s s e s s a e g a u g n a

l Brown (2004 )argues tha ta good c

e f f e d n

a itveassessments houldbepracitcal ,vaild,r eilable ,authenitc ,andl eading d

r a w o

t s washback effect. Millere tal. (2009) classfiy thep irnciple sof l anguage t

n e m s s e s s

a into 3p irnciple sonly :vaildtiy, r eilablitiy ,and usablitiy .Inf ac,tt hose e h t f o r e b m u n e h t n o s e il e c n e r e f fi d e h T . r e h t o h c a e o t r a li m i s e r a s t n e m e t a t s o w t

. s e l p i c n ir

p Duet o t heef ifciency ,allt hoset heo ire sweresynthesized i nto 3majo r t

n e m s s e s s a d o o g a f o s e l p i c n ir

p : vaildtiy ,reilablitiy ,and usabiilty ,which then .

(27)

1 1

I I R E T P A H C

E R U T A R E T I L D E T A L E R F O W E I V E R

s i h t e il r e d n u h c i h w s g n it ir w l a c it e r o e h t e h t s e v i g r e t p a h c s i h

T research .

o t s tr a p o w t e r a e r e h

T thi s chapter : theoreitca l descirpiton and theoreitca l t

u o b a s n o it p ir c s e d s e v i g n o it p ir c s e d l a c it e r o e h t e h T . k r o w e m a r

f thet heo ire sused

5 o t n i d e d i v i d , h c r a e s e r s i h t n

i secitons : reading , insrtucitona l goal s and t

n e m s s e s s a e g a u g n a l , s e v it c e j b

o ,competence ,and KPE 359 Language Learning e h t d n a y r a m m u s e h t s e v i g k r o w e m a r f l a c it e r o e h t e h T . e s r u o c t n e m s s e s s A d n a

f o s i s e h t n y

s thet heo ire sandhowt heywli lbeusedi nt hiss tudy.

.

A Theore itca lDescrip iton .

1 Reading

n i d e n o it n e m s

A thechapte rI ,reading play sacrucia lrolein Indonesia’ s e h t s s u c s i d o t e k il d l u o w r e ti r w e h t y lt s ri f , e r o f e r e h T . m e t s y s n o it a c u d e l a m r o f

e r f o e r u t a

n ading and how reading i sappiled in Indonesia’ sforma leducaiton .

m e t s y s

.

a TheNatureo fReading

s n a e m g n i d a e r , y ll a r e n e G . g n i d a e r s i g n i n r a e l e g a u g n a l n i s ll i k s e h t f o e n O

’ s r e d a e r e h t o t t x e t m o r f n o it a m r o f n i g n ir r e f s n a rt d n a g n it t e g f o s s e c o r p e l o h w e h t

mind .Gibson and Levin (1975 )interpre treading a san acitve process ,sefl -h s il g n E g n i n r a e l n I . s e s o p r u p y n a m r o f d n a s y a w y n a m n i r e d a e r e h t y b d e t c e ri d

, e g a u g n a l d n o c e s a s

(28)

a n i s s e c c u s r o f ll i k

s l leducaitona lcontexts”. I n ordert o becomeef ifcien tsecond e

g a u g n a

l reader ,st herearet woconcernst obetakeni ntoaccount .Fris,tt heyhave m

o tt o b r e t s a m o

t -upandt op-downapproach .Bo ttom-upapproachi sr elatedt ot he s

f o g n i s s e c o r p r o f s e i g e t a rt

s eparate letters ,words ,and phrase .s Meanwhlie, t op -n

o i s n e h e r p m o c g n i d a e r r o f s e i g e t a rt s e h t o t d e t a l e r s i h c a o r p p a n w o

d ,o rcan be

g n it e r p r e t n i s a g n i d a e r d e ll a c o s l

a .Second ,they need to develop approp irate a

t a m e h c s l a m r o f d n a t p e c n o

c in orde r to better understand and interpre t y

lt n e i c if f

e .Schemataheremean the related background i nformaiton and cutlura l )

5 8 1 . p ( .t x e t g n i d a e r e h t o t e c n e ir e p x e

.

b ReadinginI ndonesia’s Forma lEduca iton System ,

m e t s y s n o it a c u d e l a m r o f s ’ a i s e n o d n I n

I there are four levels of l earners , s

a n w o n k o s l a r o l o o h c S y r a t n e m e l E e r a y e h

t Sekolah Dasar (SD) ,Junio rHigh s

a n w o n k o s l a r o l o o h c

S SekolahMenengahPertama (SMP) ,Senio rHigh Schoo l s

a n w o n k o s l a r

o Sekolah Menengah Atas (SMA) ,and Highe rEducaiton o ralso s

a n w o n

k Pendidikan Tinggi .Anothe rone ,Vocaitona lSchoo lo ralso known a s n

a u r u j e K h a g n e n e M h a l o k e

S (SMK)i si nt hes amel eve lwtihSenio rHighSchool . f

o e n o s i e g a u g n a l h s il g n

E m ain subject sfo rJunio rH igh School ,Senio rH igh School ,andVocaitona lSchools tudents (KementrianPendidikanNa isonal ,2012) .

n o s

A e fo m ain subjects ,the setitng ,the learning goal ,s the topics ,the genera l n

o it a c il p p a e h t d n a s e s o p r u

p o fEngilsh language subjec tare regulated in the Naitona l Educaiton' s Minisrty' s Regulaiton o r Peraturan Menter i Dina s

l a n o i s a N n a k i d i d n e

P (Permendiknas) N o 22 ,23 ,24. Reading a sone o ffou r s

ll i k s e g a u g n a l h s il g n

(29)

3 1

s e s o p r u

p stated in the Permendiknas N 2o. .2 The attachmen to fthi sregulaiton , d

n a t S e c n e t e p m o

C ard and Basic Competence ,could be seen in Appendix B . f

e

R e irng t o Indonesia’ s Educaiton Uni tLeve lCurirculum o rKu irkulum Tingka t n

a k i d i d n e P n a u t a

S (KTSP) ,Engilsh teacher sin Indonesia have the authortiy to r

a e l e h t n o d e s a b e v it c e j b o g n i n r a e l e t a l u m r o

f ning goal s and the learners’ n

i d e t s e t o s l a s i g n i d a e R . s c it s ir e t c a r a h

c Naitona lFina lExaminaiton o rUijan l

a n o i s a N r i h k

A (UAN) ,and ti sporiton i sstated in Naitona lFina lExaminaiton y

b d e h s il b u p 2 1 0 2 / 1 1 0 2 r a e y c i m e d a c a s e n il e d i u

G Naitona l Professiona l

y c n e g A n o it a c if it r e

C orBadanStanda rNasiona lPendidikan(BNSP).

s ’ a i s e n o d n I n i d e il p p a s i ti w o h d n a g n i d a e r f o e r u t a n e h t g n i s s u c s i d r e tf A

d n a s l a o g l a n o it c u rt s n i s s u c s i d o t e k il d l u o w r e ti r w e h t , m e t s y s n o it a c u d e l a m r o f

d n u o f e h t s a e v it c e j b o g n i n r a e

l aiton o fassessment :the deifniitons ,the role in .

n o it a l u m r o f e h t d n a , s s e c o r p t n e m s s e s s a d n a l a n o it c u rt s n i

.

2 Instrucitona lGoal sandLearningObjecitves .

a Instrucitona l Goal s and Learning Objec itve s a s the Founda iton o f Assessment

o t g n i d r o c c

A Kemp (1977 ,) goal s are the statement s abou tthe main t u o b a s i tI . s m a r g o r p l a n o it a c u d e l l a e il r e d n u n e h t h c i h w e s r u o c n i a tr e c f o e s o p r u p

e e r h t r e v o c s l a o g l a n o it c u rt s n I . g n i h c a e t n i h s il p m o c c a o t t n a w s r o t a c u d e t a h w

, s t n e d u t s , y t e i c o s : s e c r u o

s and subjec t area . Gronlund (1991) states tha t o t e v a h h c i h w s e m o c t u o g n i n r a e l d e d n e t n i s a d e b ir c s e d s i e v it c e j b o l a n o it c u rt s n i

(30)
(31)

5 1

.

b Formula itngObjecitves

y ll a c if i c e p s e t a c i d n i d l u o h s e v it c e j b o g n i n r a e l d o o g a , e v o b a d e n o it n e m s A

. e s r u o c e h t f o d n e e h t t a m r o f r e p r o e v e i h c a o t e v a h s t n e d u t s t a h w t u o b a

o g n i n r a e l e v it c e f f e e t a l u m r o f y ll u f e r a c d l u o h s s r o t a c u d e , e r o f e r e h

T bjecitves.

)

1 CrtieriaofGoodLearningObjec itves e

r a e r e h

T anumbe rofcrtieirao fagoodl earningobjecitves tatedbyKemp A . s w o ll o f s a e r a p m e K y b d e t a t s a ir e ti r c l a c it c a r p h c u s f o y r a m m u s e h T . ) 7 7 9 1 (

: e v it c e j b o g n i n r a e l d o o g

)

a Need sto be understandable ,meaning tha ti ti sclea lry understandable fo r .s

r e d a e r y n a )

b Ha sclea rpurpose and consist so fone learning outcome in orde rto avoid .

g n i d n a t s r e d n u s i m )

c Provide sobservableandmeasurablel earningoutcome. )

d I sin ilne wtih the insrtucitona lgoal sstated (Competence Standard and .)

e c n e t e p m o C c i s a B )

e May involve two domains .Note tha teducaitona lobjecitve i sdivided into s i m e h t f o h c a E . r o t o m o h c y s p d n a , e v it c e f f a , e v it i n g o c : s n i a m o d e e r h t

. s e ir o g e t a c o t n i d e d i v i d b u s )

f When sequenced wtih othe rlearning objecitves ,they are arranged from .l

e v e l d e c n a v d a o t e l p m i s )

(32)
(33)

7 1

e h t l l e w w o h t u o b a s e t a c i d n i e e r g e D . r o i v a h e b d e n if e d n o e c n e t e p m o c

e t e p m o

c ncemus tbedemonsrtated (lIilnoi sOnilneNetwork ,2010).

s a e v it c e j b o g n i n r a e l d n a s l a o g l a n o it c u rt s n i f o e r u t a n e h t g n i s s u c s i d r e tf A

s s u c s i d o t e k il d l u o w r e ti r w e h t n o it c e s t x e n e h t n i ,t n e m s s e s s a f o n o it a d n u o f e h t

t e h t , e r u t a n e h t :t n e m s s e s s a e g a u g n a

l ypes ,andt heundelryingp irnciple .s

.

3 LanguageAssessment .

a TheNatureo fTes tandAssessment

s e m it e m o s , e l p o e p g n o m a r a l u p o p y r e v s y a d a w o n s i t n e m s s e s s a m r e t e h T

d e n i a l p x e n e e b s a h t i s A . t s e t d n a t n e m s s e s s a n e e w t e b n o it p e c n o c s i m g n i s u a

c i n

ri f e h

t s tchapter ,assessmenti san ongoing proces so feducaitng l earnerst hrough n

a y kind o flearning acitvtiy .On the othe rhand ,tes ti sthe way to measure a n i a m o d n i a tr e c n i t n e m e v e i h c a r o , e c n a m r o f r e p , e g d e l w o n k , y ti li b a s ’ n o s r e p

b s i t n e m s s e s s a , s u h T . ) 4 0 0 2 , n w o r B

( roadert han t est ; tii ncludest ests ,wh liet es t .s

t n e d u t s s s e s s a o t e s u n a c s r e h c a e t t a h t s k s a t y n a m f o e n o y l n o s i

.

b Type so fAssessment e t a t s ) 4 0 0 2 ( n w o r

B s thatt hereares everalt ype sofl anguageassessmen:t

)

1 Forma lAssessment

e d s i t n e m s s e s s a f o e p y t s i h

T signed to be conducted “to tap into a s i h c i h w t n e m s s e s s a f o e p y t a s i t I . ) 6 . p ( ” e g d e l w o n k d n a s ll i k s f o e s u o h e r o t s

’ s t n e d u t s e r u s a e m o t r e d r o n i d e t c u d n o c d n a , d e n n a l p l l e w , c it a m e t s y s

s u a c e B . t s e t d e z i d r a d n a t s a d n a t s e t l a n if : e l p m a x e r o f , t n e m e v e i h c

(34)
(35)
(36)

s s e s s a h g u o h t n e v

E ing vaild tiy o fassessmen ti scompilcated to do ,and n

e v

e though therei sno absolutemeasureo fvaild tiy ,thereareconsideraiton so f p

l e h n a c t a h t e c n e d i v e f o s d n i k l a r e v e

s theevaluatortoobservet hevaildtiyo fan t

n e m s s e s s

a .

)

b Majo rconsideraitonsi nassessmen tvaildaiton

There are severa l consideraiton s in assessmen t vaildaiton . They are .s

w o ll o f s a d e n i a l p x e

) 1

( Content-relatedevidence t

n e t n o

C -related evidence refer sto the representaiton to the subjec t n

a f o r e tt a

m assessment .I fan assessment clealry measures wha tstudent s t

i n e h t , e v e i h c a o t e v a

h i sconsidered highly vaild .I fa tes tsample sthe t s e t s e ri u q e r d n a d e v e i h c a e b o t s n o i s u l c n o c h c i h w t u o b a r e tt a m t c e j b u

s -take r

r e h t o n I . y ti d il a v t n e t n o c e h t m i a l c n a c t i , r o i v a h e b d e ri s e d e h t m r o f r e p o t

r o

w ds ,anassessmen ta sawholeshouldr epresentt hel earningobjecitve sand e

b approp irate to the outcome sbeing measured .Fu trher ,each tiem in the e h t f o e n o n t e y e v it c e j b o g n i n r a e l c if i c e p s a e r u s a e m d l u o h s t n e m s s e s s a

n i h e b t f e l e b y a m s e v it c e j b o g n i n r a e

l d .A san i llusrtaiton, i facoursehast en n a r o t n e m s s e s s a e h t n i d e r e v o c e r a o w t y l n o t u b s e v it c e j b o g n i n r a e l

, s e v it c e j b o g n i n r a e l y n a g n ir u s a e m t o n e r a h c i h w s m e ti f o s t s i s n o c t n e m s s e s s a

t n e t n o c n e h

t -relatedevidences uffers . )

2

( Crtieiron-relatedevidence n

o ir e ti r

(37)
(38)

o t s r e f e r y ti d il a v e c a

F “thedegreet owhichanassessmentl ook s irght , r

o e g d e l w o n k e h t e r u s a e m o t s r a e p p a d n

a abiilite si tclaim sto measure” (Brown ,2004 .p .26) .The keyword shere are l‘ooks ’and ‘appears’ .I ti s

y d o b y n a f o t n e m g d u j e v it c e j b u s a s i y ti d il a v e c a f t a h t s u o i v b

o who observe s

s a t n e m s s e s s a e h t w e i v s t n e d u t s e h t n e h w d e m r o f r e p t s e b s i y ti d il a v e c a F . ti

y r e v a s i y ti d il a v e c a f , s s e l e h tr e v e N . l o o t l u f e s u d n a , t n a v e l e r , ri a f , d il a v

j b u

s ecitve matter t o evaluate .How high t hedegreeo fface vaildtiy depend s .r

e d l o h e b e h t f o e y e e h t n o

)

c Factorsi n lfuencingvaildtiy o

t g n i d r o c c

A Mille re tal .(2009) ,there are severa lfactor sin lfuencing a

r o t s e t e h t s i e n o t s ri f e h T . t n e m s s e s s a f o y ti d il a

v ssessmen t tisefl .Such low

: w o l e b s n o it i d n o c e h t h ti w n e p p a h l li w y ti d il a v f o e e r g e d

) 1

( Unclea rdriecitons )

2

( Toodfi ifcutlr eadingvocabularyands entences rtucture )

3

( Ambigutiy )

4

( Inadequate itme ilmtis )

5

( Overemphasi so f easy- ot -asses saspect so f domain a tthe expense fo tl

u c if fi d t u b t n a tr o p m

i - ot -asses saspects )

6

( Inapprop iratet es ttiemst ot heoutcome sbeingmeasured )

7

( Poo lryconsrtuctedt es ttiems )

8

( Inapprop iratel engtho fassessment )

9

( Imprope rarrangemen to ftiems ,and )

0 1

(39)
(40)

y ti li b a il e

R provide sthe consistency tha tmake svaild tiy possible . Even s

i y ti li b a il e r h g u o h

t necessary , ti i sno tasufifcien tcondiiton f o rvaildtiy .Ast he s i y ti d il a v f o e e r g e d e h t t a h t s e t a c i d n i y ti li b a il e r w o l h ti w t n e m s s e s s a n a , e l p m a x e

o l o s l

a w .An assessmen twtih inconsisten tresutl scannot possibly posses svaild o

f r e p e h t t u o b a n o it a m r o f n

i rmancedesriedt o bemeasured .Ontheothe rhand ,an f o e e r g e d h g i h e h t e t a c i d n i s y a w l a t o n s e o d y ti li b a il e r h g i h h ti w t n e m s s e s s a

( . y ti d il a

v Mille re tal. ,2009) )

b Factorsi n lfuencingr eilablitiymeasures

g n i c n e u lf n i s r o t c a f l a r e v e s , t n e i c if f e o c y ti li b a il e r g n it e r p r e t n i n e h

W the

t n e m s s e s s a n a f o y ti li b a il e

r mus tbet akeni ntoaccount .Somef actorsmayevenbe c

u rt s n o c n e h w s n o it a r e d i s n o c y ti li b a il e r e h t s a d e s

u itnganassessment .

) 4 0 0 2 ( n w o r B n i d e ti c s a ) 2 0 0 2 ( i v a s u o

M arguesthatt herearef ourf actor s t

n e d u t s : t n e m s s e s s a f o y ti li b a il e r e h t g n i c n e u lf n

i -related reilablitiy , rate r .

y ti li b a il e r t s e t d n a , y ti li b a il e r n o it a rt s i n i m d a t s e t , y ti li b a il e

r Theexplanaiton sare

.s w o ll o f s a

) 1

( Student-RelatedReilablitiy t

n e d u t

S -related reilablitiy i ssuei scaused by t hestudents ’physica lo r s ’ e n o m o r f e t a i v e d e r o c s ’ d e v r e s b o ‘ n a e s u a c y a m t a h t s r o t c a f l a c i g o l o h c y s p

a f l e e f ,s s e n ll i y r a r o p m e t e v a h s t n e d u t s n e h W . e r o c s ’ e u rt

‘ itgue,f ee lanxiety ,

, t n e m s s e s s a n i a tr e c f o e r o c s ri e h t e c n e u lf n i y a m t a h t s s e n k c i s l a c i s y h p e v a h r o

. y ti li b a il e r n i e u s s i e h t d e r e d i s n o c e b n a c t i s u h t

) 2

(41)

5 2

r o f , s r e n i m a x e e h t y b d e s u a c s i t a h t e u s s i e h t s i y ti li b a il e r r e t a R

e n a m u h : e l p m a x

e rror ,subjecitvtiy ,and bias .They may come from both r

e t n

i -rate rreilablitiy and inrta-rate rreilablitiy .Inter-rate rreilablitiy occur s n

e h

w more than one examiner give inconsisten t score fo r the same a

n o n e m o n e h p s i h t r o f s e s u a c e l b i s s o p e h T . t n e m s s e s s

a re thei r lack o f

f o n o it a c il p m i r o , e c n e ir e p x e f o k c a l , a ir e ti r c g n ir o c s e h t n o n o it n e tt a

a rt n I . s e s a i b d e v o r p p a n

u -rate rreilablitiy i ssue occur swhen examiner smake : e l p m a x e r o f ,s e v l e s m e h t s r e n i m a x e e h t e d i s t u o m o r f s r o t c a f y b d e s u a c s r o r r e

ir o c s r a e l c n

u ng crtie ira ,faitgue caused by t he ilmtied itme o fevaluaiton ,o r .s

t n e d u t s ’ d a b ‘ d n a ’ d o o g ‘ f o s e s a i b e h t

) 3

( Tes tAdminisrtaitonReilablitiy

t o n s i d e t c u d n o c s i t n e m s s e s s a e h t h c i h w f o n o it i d n o c e h t n e h W

e r e h T . y ti li b a il e r n u e h t d e s u a c t i , h g u o n e e v i c u d n o

c aresome examples:t he

d e r e t s i n i m d a s i r e d r o c e r e p a t g n i s u t s e t g n i n e t s il e h t r o t n e m s s e s s a g n i n e t s il

h c i h w m o o r a n

i i slocatednea rabusysrtee tso t hatt hestudent scanno thea r t

e e h s n o it s e u q f o s r e b m u n e h t r o , y lr a e l c g n i d r o c e r e h

t s arelesst hant hetota l t

a h t o s s s a l c a f o s t n e d u t

s students have to share one quesiton shee twtih .t

n e d u t s r e h t o n a

) 4

( Tes tReilablitiy

e h t r o t n e m s s e s s a e h t f o e r u t a n e h t m o r f e m o c y a m y ti li b a il e r n u e h T

a s e k a t t s e t a f I .f l e s ti t s e

t long itmet oadminister ,student smayf ee lboredo r e r a o h w e l p o e p o s l a e r a e r e h T . m e ti t s a l e h t h c a e r y e h t e m it e h t y b d e u g it a f

a g n i o d n i d o o g t o

(42)

o h t n e v e t s e t e m

it ugh they are perhap sin fact good in understanding the .s

l a ir e t a m

it i d d a n

I ont owha tha sbeens tatedbyMousavi( 2002) ,Mille re tal.( 2009 ) e

u g r

a tha t the factor s in lfuencing reilab litiy could also come up from the , s e r o c s f o d a e r p s , s k s a t t n e m s s e s s a f o r e b m u n e r a s r o t c a f e s o h T . fl e s ti t n e m s s e s s a

t s e f o s d o h t e m d n a , y ti v it c e j b

o imaitngr eilablitiy. )

1

( Numbe ro fAssessmen tTasks ti l p s e h t h ti w t n e l a v i u q e n

I -hal fmethod o fesitmaitng the reilablitiy , s

a t t n e m s s e s s a f o r e b m u n e h t n e h

w ks i s l arge,r t he reilablitiy also become s d

l u o c s i h T . r e h g i

h happen since “a longe rassessmen twli lprovide a more e b o t t p a e r a s e r o c s e h t d n a d e r u s a e m g n i e b r o i v a h e b e h t f o e l p m a s e t a u q e d a

e h t s n a e m e r e h t n e m s s e s s a r e g n o L . ) 5 2 1 . p ( ” s r o t c a f e c n a h c y b d e tr o t s i d s s e l

g n i e b r o i v a h e b d e ri s e d h c a e r o f s k s a t t n e m s s e s s a f o r e b m u n g n i s a e r c n i

u l c n o c n I . d e r u s a e

m sion ,the increasing numbe ro fassessmen ttask sfo r f o y c n e t s i s n o c e h t e s a e r c n i y ll a c i g o l l li w r o i v a h e b d e ri s e d n i a tr e c

. ll e w s a t n e m e r u s a e m

d n e t x e e ri u q e r l li w t n e m s s e s s a r e g n o l , s s e l e h tr e v e

N ed itme to

f o h t g n e l , t c a f n I . e t e l p m o

c itme and expense scould be tolerable i fthe e h t r o d e s s e s s a g n i e b s l a u d i v i d n i e h t r o f e c n a tr o p m i r o j a m s a h t n e m s s e s s a

d o o g a s a d e r e d i s n o c s i t n e m s s e s s a e h t f i e l b a t p e c c a o s l a s i t I . y t e i c o s

e h t o t o s l a t u b t n e m e r u s a e m e h t o t y l n o t o n s t c a p m i s e v i g h c i h w t n e m s s e s s a

e l ’ s t n e d u t

(43)
(44)

I “ . s n o it u l o s r e h t o e b t h g i

m ncreased objecitvtiywli lcontirbutet o t hegreate r b

a il e r g n i c if ir c a s t u o h ti w y ti li b a il e

r litiy”( Mille re tal. ,2009 .p.127 .) )

4

( Method so fEsitmaitngReilablitiy

, t n e i c if f e o c y ti li b a il e r o t d e t a l e r y l e s o l c s i n o it a m it s e y ti li b a il e r e c n i S

s e f o s d o h t e m ‘ e h

t itmaitng reilablitiy ’ i s considered one o f the factor s y ti li b a il e r e h t f o e z i s e h t , l a r e n e g n I “ . t n e m s s e s s a f o y ti li b a il e r g n i c n e u lf n i

m e h t o t d e t a l e r s i t n e i c if f e o

c ethod o fesitmaitng reilablitiy” (Mille re tal. , .

9 0 0

2 p.127) .I tmean stha tthe vairaiton o fthe degree o freilablitiy o fan . y ti li b a il e r e t a m it s e o t n e s o h c s i d o h t e m h c i h w n o s d n e p e d t n e m s s e s s a

)

c Howt omakeassessmen tmorer eilable

n o e r o m d e z i s a h p m e e r a y ti li b a il e r f o s n o it a m it s e e h t , e r o f e b d e n i a l p x e s A

r e h t a r d e s u t n e m u rt s n i f o t l u s e r e h

t than the insrtumen t tisefl .Impossiblitiy o f e h t n e h w s n e p p a h t n e m s s e s s a f o y ti li b a il e r e h t e t a u l a v e o t e r o c s ’ s t n e d u t s g n i s u

. d e t c u d n o c t e y t o n s i fl e s ti t n e m s s e s s

a Hughe s(1989) statest , hat there areway s o

r f h t o b e l b a il e r e r o m t n e m s s e s s a e k a m o t w o h n

o m the pefrormance o f

. g n ir o c s e h t f o y ti li b a il e r e h t d n a s e t a d i d n a c

) 1

( Takeenoughs ampleo fbehavior )

2

( Allowcandidate sapprop iratefreedom ,nott oomuch )

3

( Wrtieunambiguou stiems )

4

( Provideclea randexp ilctii nsrtucitons )

5

( Ensuret hatt est sarewelll aidou tandpefrecltyl egible )

6

( Candidatess houldbef amiila rwtihf orma tandt esitngt echniques )

7

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Denagan aneka makanan dan minuman yang enak dan segar dengan harga yang bias dicapai oleh semua golongan masyarakat sehingga hal tersebutlah yang menyebabkan ketertarikan saya

Fasilitas yang disediakan oleh penulis dalam perancangan ini adalah kapel sebagai tempat berdoa baik bagi komunitas maupun masyarakat sekitar, biara dengan desain interior

Kata hasud berasal dari berasal dari bahasa arab ‘’hasadun’’,yang berarti dengki,benci.dengki adalah suatu sikap atau perbuatan yang mencerminkan

[r]

“ STUDI DESKRIPTIF MENGENAI SUBJECTIVE WELLBEING PADA LANSIA PENDERITA PENYAKIT KRONIS YANG MENGIKUTI PROLANIS DI PUSKESMAS ‘X’ KOTA BANDUNG “. Universitas Kristen

[r]

Konselor :”Sebagai kesimpulan akhir dari pembicaraan kita dapat Bapak simpulkan bahwa Anda mempunyai kesulitan untuk berkomunikasi dalam belajar oleh karena itu mulai besok anda

Asian Institut for Teacher Education, menjelaskan kompetensi sosial guru adalah salah satu daya atau kemampuan guru untuk mempersiapkan peserta didik