40
6.
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Adawyah, R. (2007). Pengolahan dan Pengawetan Ikan. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta
Aitken, A; I.M. Mackie; J.H. Merrit dan M.L. Windsor. (1982).
Fish Handling and
Processing. Crown. Edinburgh.
Anonim (2009).
The Shelf Life of Vacuum Packed and Non-Vacuum Packed Food.
Sumber www.lava-vacuum-packing.com. Didownload tanggal: 6 September
2012
Apriyantono, A, D. Fardiaz, N.L. Puspitasari, Sedarnawati dan Budiyanto. (1989).
Petunjuk Laboratorium Analisa. Pangan dan Gizi. IPB
Arambewela, L., Arawwawala M., and Rajapaksa, D. (2006). Piper Betel : a Potential
Natural Antioxidant. International Journal of Food Science Vol 41 (Suplement
1): 10-14
Ariyani, F. J.T.Murtini dan T.H. Siregar. (2010). Penggunaan Ekstrak Daun Jambu Biji
(Psidium guajava) sebagai Pengawet Pindang Tongkol. Jurnal Pascapanen dan
Bioteknologi Kelautan dan Perikanan Vol 5 (1): 29-42
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. (1990).
Official Method of Analysis
Volume One 15
thEdition. Association of Official Analytical Chemist Inc.
Arlington, Virginia USA.
Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan Republik Indonesia. (2009).
Penetapan Batas
Maksimum Cemaran Mikroba dan Kimia dalam Makanan. Percetakan Negara.
Jakarta
Bennion, M and O. Hughes. (1975). Introductory Foods 6
thed. Macmillan Publishing
Company, Inc. USA
Caballero, M.E, Lopez, M, Perez-Mateos, J.A, Borderiaz and Montero, P. (2000).
Extension of The Shelf Life of Prawns (Panaeus japonicas) by Vacuum
Packaging and High-Pressure Treatment.
Journal of Food Protection Vol 63
(10): 1381-1388
deMan, J.M. (1997). Food Chemistry
(Terjemahan: Kimia Makanan, diterjemahkan K.
Padmawinata). Edisi kedua. Penerbit ITB. Bandung
Direktorat Jenderal Perikanan. 1979.
Buku Pedoman Pengenalan Sumberdaya
Perikanan Laut Bagian 1: Jenis-jenis Ikan Ekonomis Penting. Direktorat
Jenderal Perikanan. Departemen Pertanian.
Fellows, P. (2000). Food Processing Technology : Principles and Practises 2nd edition.
Woodhead Publishing Limited. Cambridge.
Fitzgerald, M, D.B. Papkovsky, M. Smiddy, J.P. Kerry, C.K. O’Sullivan, D.J. Buckley
and G.G. Guilbault. (2001). Non-Destructive Monitoring of Oxygen Profiles in
Packaged Food Using Phase-Fluorimetric Oxygen Sensor.
Journal of Food
Science Vol 66 (1): 105-110
Flick, G. Jr. (2003).
Novel Applications of High Pressure Processing. Global
Aquaculture Advocate Vol.6, Issue 3
Frazier, W.C and D.C. Westhoff. (1988). Food Microbiology 4
thEdition. McGraw-Hill
Book Co. Singapore
Hadiwiyoto, S. (1995).
Hubungan Keadaan Kimiawi dm Mikrobiologik Ikan Pindang
Naya Pada Penyimpanan Suhu Kamar Dengan Sifat Organoleptiknya. Fakultas
Teknologi Pertanian. Universitas Gadjah Mada. Yogyakarta.
Hall, G.M. (1997).
Fish Processing Technology 2
nded. Blackie Academy and
Professional. Glasgow
Handayani, N.M.S, A.A.S. Dewi, N. Riti dan I.G.P.S. Ardana. (2004)
Cemaran
Mikroba dan Residu Antibiotika Pada Produk Asal Hewan di Provinsi Bali,
NTB dan NTT Tahun 2003-2004. Sumber http://bppv-dps.info. Didownload
tanggal 6 September 2012.
Herschdoefer, S.M. (1986).
Quality Control in the Food Industry 2
nded. Vol. 2.
Academic Press, Inc. London.
Howgate, P. (2010). A Critical Review of Total-Volatile-Bases and Trimethylamine as
Indices of Freshness of Fish. Part 2: Formation of the Bases and Application in
Quality Assurance. Electronic Journal of Environmental, Agricultural and Food
Chemistry Vol 9(1): 58-88
Ilyas, S. (1983). Teknologi Refrigasi Hasil Perikanan: Teknik Pendinginan Ikan Jilid 1.
CV Paripurna. Jakarta
Jenie, B.S.L, Nuratifa dan Suliantari. (2001). Peningkatan Keamanan dan Mutu Simpan
Pindang Ikan Kembung (Rastrelliger sp) dengan Aplikasi Kombinasi Natrium
Asetat, Bakteri Asam Laktat dan Pengemasan Vakum.
Jurnal Teknologi dan
Industri Pangan Vol XII (1) : 21-27
Julianti, E dan M. Nurminah. (2006).
Teknologi Pengemasan. Departemen Teknologi
Pertanian Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Sumatera Utara.
Kadoya, T. (1990). Food Packaging. Academic Press Inc. San Diego, California
Kerr, M. Lawicki, P. Aguirre, S. and Rayner, C. (2002). Effect of Storage Conditions on
Histamine Formation in Fresh and Canned Tuna. State Chemitry Laboratory,
Werrbee. Victorian Government Departement of Human Services.
www.foodsafety.vic.gov.au
Komariah, I.I. Arief dan Y. Wiguna. (2004). Kualitas Fisik dan Mikroba Daging Sapi
yang Ditambah Jahe (Zingiber officinale
Roscoe) pada Konsentrasi dan Lama
Penyimpanan yang Berbeda. Media Peternakan ed. Agustus Vol 27 (2) : 46-54
Lin, K.W and Lin, S.N. (2002). Physicochemical Properties and Microbial Stability of
Reduced-Fat Chinese-Style Sausage Stored Under Modified Atmosphere
Systems. Journal of Food Science Vol 67 (8): 3184-3189
Marwati, T, Ch. Winarti dan D. Sumangat. (1996). Aktivitas Zat Antibakteri pada
Rimpang Kunyit.
Prosiding Simpusium Nasional: Tumbuhan Obat dan
Aromatik APIMAP: 37-43
Moeljanto. (1992).
Pengawetan dan Pengolahan Hasil Perikanan. Penebar Swadaya.
Jakarta
Oonmetta-aree, J., T.Suzuki, P.Gasaluck and G.Eumkeb. (2006)
Antimicrobial
Properties and Action of Galangal (Alpina galangal Linn.) on Staphylococcus
aureus. www.elsevier.com/locate/lwt LWT 39 (2006): 1214-1220
Pandit, G.S, Mangku, G.P dan Suparwata, N.B. (1997). Penggunaan Jenis Bahan
Pengemas dan Lama Penyimpanan terhadap Stabilitas Mutu Ikan Tongkol.
Prosiding Seminar Teknologi Pangan 1997: 487-495
_____, Suryadhi, N.T, Arka, I.B dan Adiputra, N. (2011). Pengaruh Penyiangan dan
Suhu Penyimpanan terhadap Mutu Kimiawi, Mikrobiologis dan Organoleptik
Ikan Tongkol (Auxis thazard, Lac). Sumber http: //ejournal.unud.ac.id/ abstrak/
e-journal_suranaya_pandit.doc. Didownload tanggal: 6 September 2012
Potter, N.N. and H.J. Hotchkiss. (1996). Food Science 5
thEdition. CBB Publisher. New
Delhi.
Purwani, E dan Muwakhidah. (2008).
Efek Berbagai Pengawet Alami Sebagai
Pengganti Formalin terhadap Sifat Orgaanoleptik dan Masa Simpan Daging dan
Ikan. Jurnal Penelitian Sains & Teknologi Vol 9(1): 1-4
_________, E. Retnaningtyas dan D. Widowati. (2012). Pengembangan Model
Pengawet Alami dari Ekstrak Lengkuas (Languas galaga) Kunyit (Curcuma
domestica) dan Jahe (Zingiber officinale) sebagai Pengganti Formalin pada
Daging Segar. Makalah Seminar Nasional IX Pendidikan Biologi FKIP UNS 7
Juli 2012
Puspitasari, Y.F. (2009). Cara Pemindangan dan Kadar Protein Ikan Tomgkol (Auxis
thazard) di Kabupaten Rembang. Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan
Universitas Muhammadiah Surakarta (Skripsi)
Rosenthal, A.J. (1999). Food Texture Measurement & Perception. Aspen Publisher, Inc.
Maryland.
Setyabudi, D.A dan W. Broto. (2008).
Kemasan Plastik Telah Menggeser Kemasan
Tradisional.http://pascapanen.litbang.deptan.go.id/index.php/berita/55
didownload tanggal: 6 September 2012.
Shahidi, Fereidoon and J.R. Botta. (1994). Seafoods: Chemistry, Processing Technology
and Quality. Blackie Academy and Professional. Glasgow.
Standar Nasional Indonesia. (2006).
Penentuan Angka Lempeng Total (ALT) pada
Produk Perikanan. SNI 01-2332.3-2006
Syarief, R. dan H. Halid. (1991). Teknologi Pengolahan Pangan. Arcan.Jakarta
Widyasari, R.A.H.E. (2006).
Pengaruh Pengawetan menggunakan Biji Picung
(Pangium edule
Reinw) Terhadap Kesegaran dan Keamanan Ikan Kembung
Segar (Rastrelliger brachysoma). Sekolah Pascasarjana Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Bogor (Thesis)
Winarno, F.G; S. Fardiaz dan F.Dedi. (1984).
Pengantar Teknologi Pertanian.
PT.Gramedia. Jakarta.
Welt, B.A; D.S. Sage and K.L. Berger. (2003). Performance Spesification of
Time-Temperaature Integrators Designed to Protect Against Botulism in Refrigerated
Fresh Food. Journal of Food Science Vol 68(1): 2-9
7.
LAMPIRAN
Lampiran 3. Hasil Analisa Data (Output SPSS)
Oneway
Post Hoc Tests
Homogeneous Subsets
Air_0Duncan
Treatment N
Subset for alpha = .05
1 2 3 4
Lengkuas 6 66.2617
Kluwak 6 66.7400
Lengkuas UV 6 66.7433
Kluwak UV 6 67.2200 67.2200
Garam UV 6 67.7950 67.7950
Kunyit UV 6 68.1550 68.1550 68.1550
Jahe 6 68.2100 68.2100 68.2100
Kunyit 6 68.7050 68.7050
Garam 6 68.9483
Jahe UV 6 68.9533
Sig. .068 .059 .083 .138
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
T_Air_0
Duncan
Treatment N
Subset for alpha = .05
1 2 3
Lengkuas 6 66.3333
Kluwak 6 66.6667
Lengkuas UV 6 66.6667
Kluwak UV 6 67.1667 67.1667
Garam UV 6 68.0000 68.0000
Jahe 6 68.1667 68.1667
Kunyit UV 6 68.1667 68.1667
Kunyit 6 68.6667
Garam 6 69.0000
Jahe UV 6 69.0000
Sig. .115 .058 .069
TVN_0
Duncan
Treatment N
Subset for alpha = .05
1 2 3 4
Garam UV 6 165.54550
Garam 6 165.66950
Kunyit 6 168.20900
Jahe 6 168.29200
Jahe UV 6 168.35533
Kunyit UV 6 169.26100
Lengkuas 6 177.00517
Lengkuas UV 6 177.07650
Kluwak 6 180.52933
Kluwak UV 6 180.58317
Sig. .813 .071 .892 .918
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
TMA_0
Duncan
Treatment N
Subset for alpha = .05
1 2
Jahe 6 22.19917
Jahe UV 6 22.20650
Lengkuas 6 22.49950
Kluwak 6 22.50450
Lengkuas UV 6 22.50467
Kluwak UV 6 22.50950
Kunyit UV 6 24.12850
Kunyit 6 24.13483
Garam UV 6 24.76767
Garam 6 24.78133
Sig. .593 .241
Hard_0
Duncan
Treatment N
Subset for alpha = .05
1 2 3 4
Jahe 6 874.15083
Jahe UV 6 874.15083
Lengkuas 6 884.96967
Lengkuas UV 6 884.96967
Kluwak 6 932.98733
Kluwak UV 6 932.98733
Kunyit 6
1047.99467
Kunyit UV 6
1047.99467
Garam 6
1143.52017
Garam UV 6
1143.52017
Sig. .070 1.000 1.000 1.000
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
Spring_0
Duncan
Treatment N
Subset for alpha = .05
1 2 3 4
Lengkuas 6 2.51550
Lengkuas UV 6 2.51550
Kunyit 6 2.55667
Kunyit UV 6 2.55667
Kluwak 6 3.02500
Kluwak UV 6 3.02500
Jahe 6 3.32717
Jahe UV 6 3.32717
Garam 6 3.77483
Garam UV 6 3.77483
Sig. .784 1.000 1.000 1.000
TPC_0
Duncan
Treatment N
Subset for alpha = .05
1 2 3
Jahe UV 6 5.45017
Jahe 6 5.45033
Lengkuas 6 5.47600
Lengkuas UV 6 5.47600
Kunyit 6 5.70717
Kunyit UV 6 5.70717
Garam UV 6 5.72283
Garam 6 5.74517
Kluwak 6 6.45017
Kluwak UV 6 6.45017
Sig. .640 .491 1.000
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
Air_3
Duncan
Treatment N
Subset for alpha = .05
1 2 3 4 5
Kluwak 6 65.5533
Lengkuas 6 66.2300 66.2300
Kunyit 6 66.7483 66.7483 66.7483
Jahe 6 66.8883 66.8883 66.8883
Garam UV 6 67.6783 67.6783 67.6783
Garam 6 67.9250 67.9250 67.9250
Kluwak UV 6 68.4983 68.4983
Jahe UV 6 69.5667 69.5667
Kunyit UV 6 69.5917 69.5917
Lengkuas UV 6 70.6900
Sig. .181 .097 .086 .060 .243
TVN_3
Duncan Treatmen
t N
Subset for alpha = .05
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Garam 6 135.51
900
Kunyit 6 143.80
883
Kluwak 6 151.04
483
Jahe 6 152.00
217
Lengkuas 6 157.82
467
Jahe UV 6 170.40
717
Kunyit
UV 6 178.22650
Lengkuas
UV 6 182.41033
Kluwak
UV 6 193.44067
Garam
UV 6 196.56833
Sig. 1.000 1.000 .281 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
TMA_3
Duncan
Treatment N
Subset for alpha = .05
1 2 3 4 5 6
Jahe UV 6 31.23500
Lengkuas 6 31.47067
Lengkuas UV 6 35.13867
Kunyit 6 36.00750
Kluwak UV 6 38.03400
Jahe 6 39.44800
Kunyit UV 6 40.73767
Garam 6 42.84050
Kluwak 6 42.91967
Garam UV 6 46.36850
Sig. .725 .198 1.000 .059 .906 1.000
Hard_3
Duncan
Treatment N
Subset for alpha = .05
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Kluwak 6 741.094
50
Jahe 6 742.698
00
Kunyit 6 895.409
67
Garam 6 899.709
17
Garam UV 6 949.521
00
Lengkuas 6 1139.26
650
Lengkuas
UV 6 1167.31417
Jahe UV 6 1588.86
383
Kluwak UV 6 1735.97
367
Kunyit UV 6 2437.15
200
Sig. .759 .412 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
Spring_3
Duncan
Treatment N
Subset for alpha = .05
1 2 3 4
Kunyit 6 2.47500
Lengkuas UV 6 2.75083
Kunyit UV 6 2.83667
Lengkuas 6 2.86650
Jahe UV 6 3.11850
Kluwak UV 6 3.12600
Kluwak 6 3.18283
Jahe 6 3.27867
Garam 6 3.53900
Garam UV 6 3.60350
Sig. 1.000 .346 .208 .575
TPC_3
Duncan
Treatment N
Subset for alpha = .05
1 2 3 4 5 6
Kluwak 6 6.74083
Garam UV 6 6.79117
Jahe UV 6 7.03317
Garam 6 7.12517 7.12517
Kunyit UV 6 7.20883 7.20883
Kluwak UV 6 7.26850 7.26850 7.26850
Lengkuas UV 6 7.29183 7.29183 7.29183
Kunyit 6 7.31300 7.31300
Lengkuas 6 7.40400 7.40400
Jahe 6 7.51500
Sig. .539 .264 .066 .251 .135 .179
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
Air_7
Duncan
Treatment N
Subset for alpha = .05
1 2 3 4
Kluwak 6 55.7650
Jahe 6 56.3467
Garam 6 56.5533
Kunyit 6 56.9467
Lengkuas 6 57.2650
Kluwak UV 6 69.3167
Lengkuas UV 6 71.0133 71.0133
Jahe UV 6 71.2017
Garam UV 6 71.2783
Kunyit UV 6 73.6600
Sig. .120 .050 .771 1.000
T_Air_7
Duncan
Treatment N
Subset for alpha = .05
1 2 3
Kluwak 6 .6486
Jahe 6 .6538
Garam 6 .6556
Kunyit 6 .6591
Lengkuas 6 .6617
Kluwak UV 6 .7592
Lengkuas UV 6 .7716
Jahe UV 6 .7731
Garam UV 6 .7734
Kunyit UV 6 .7904
Sig. .079 .052 1.000
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
TVN_7
Duncan
Treatment N
Subset for alpha = .05
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Jahe UV 6 174.080
50
Kunyit 6 175.018
17
Lengkuas
UV 6 186.49633
Kunyit UV 6 188.916
17
Garam 6 189.350
83
Lengkuas 6 195.458
17
Kluwak UV 6 207.793
17
Kluwak 6 213.404
83
Jahe 6 221.797
33
Garam UV 6 227.496
50
Sig. .306 1.000 .634 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
TMA_7
Duncan Treatmen
t N
Subset for alpha = .05
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Jahe UV 6 38.767
50
Lengkuas
UV 6 51.60117
Kluwak
UV 6 53.01333
Kunyit 6 56.430
83
Kunyit UV 6 58.756
83
Garam
UV 6 65.52283
Garam 6 78.244
50
Lengkuas 6 80.616
00
Jahe 6 92.422
17
Kluwak 6 95.913
50
Sig. 1.000 .130 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
Hard_7
Duncan Treatme
nt N
Subset for alpha = .05
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Lengkua
s UV 6 1083.89300
Kunyit
UV 6 1333.00700
Jahe UV 6 1358.
02600
Kunyit 6 1948.
39900
Jahe 6 2009.
11317
Garam
UV 6 2153.64817
Garam 6 2464.
72100
Lengkua
s 6 2714.29617
Kluwak
UV 6 2853.79017
Kluwak 6 3134.
08117
Sig. 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Spring_7
Duncan
Treatment N
Subset for alpha = .05
1 2 3 4 5
Lengkuas UV 6 2.97717
Kunyit UV 6 3.02483 3.02483
Kunyit 6 3.10083 3.10083
Lengkuas 6 3.15100 3.15100
Jahe UV 6 3.15417 3.15417
Garam UV 6 3.27983 3.27983
Kluwak UV 6 3.32317 3.32317
Kluwak 6 3.55000 3.55000
Jahe 6 3.65583
Garam 6 4.16767
Sig. .239 .050 .057 .425 1.000
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 6.000.
TPC_7
Duncan
Treatment N
Subset for alpha = .05
1 2 3 4
Kluwak 6 7.20400
Kunyit UV 6 7.29383 7.29383
Kunyit 6 7.44150 7.44150
Jahe UV 6 7.47433
Garam 6 7.48917
Kluwak UV 6 7.49117
Garam UV 6 7.50183
Lengkuas UV 6 7.50883
Jahe 6 7.60800 7.60800
Lengkuas 6 7.72100
Sig. .241 .057 .061 .142