Institutional Repository | Satya Wacana Christian University: Politeness Strategies in Anonymous Online Discussion

(1)

POLITEI\TESS

STRATEGIES

IN

ANOI\TYMOUS

ONLINE

DISCUSSION

TIIESIS

Submitted in Partial

Fulfillment

of the Requirements for the Degree

of

Sarjana Pendidikan

Nadia Ananda H€danto

tt20tm74

Approved by:

C*h*

Christian

kldianto.

M.Appling

Examiner

(2)

ffi

PERPUSTAKAAN UNIvERSITAS TINIVERSITAS KRISTEN SATYA WACANA

ll. Dipmegorc 52 _-50Srbtigr 5O7t I

JawaTemgatrr, Irdffii.

Tdp.0298 _-321212, F.x.0298 321+33 frmll library@adm.ulsw.edu ; Lry: //lihrary.ukm.edu

PERNYATAAN

PERSETUJUAN AKSES

Sayayang bertandatangan di bawah ini:

Nadiq Anandq

Herianlo Nama

NIM

Fakultas

Judul tugas akhir

112,0100?4 Email

Program Studi

Bahasa

don

Sasira

:

tl20lootq

@ student.(rt(strr'edu

:

Pendiairan

Bahara ln49ric

Potl+eness $trategie"l

in

Anon.4mrus

Online

Digcussion

Dengan

ini

saya menyeral*an hak non-eksHustf kepada Perpustakaan Universitas

-

Universitas Kristen Satya

Wacana uatuk menyimpan, mengatur akses serta melakukan pengelolaan terhadap karya saya

ini

dengan

mengacu pada ketentuan akses tugas aktrir elekhonik sebagai b€rikut (beri tanda pada kotak yang sesuai):

M ,.

Saya mengijinkan karya tersebut diunggah

ke

dalam aplikasi Repositori PerpustakaanUniversitas,

dan/ atau portal GARLJDA

E

b.

Saya tidak mengiiinkan karya tersebut diunggah ke dalam aplikasi Repositori Perpustakaan Universitas,

danl atav portal GARUDA*

*

fiak yary $dak WbAailwrqia bagi s$u ptltak soJa. Per8dq; Wncllti, dan naltariwa yang rnen;erahlwn lwh kepqdrt Repwitafi Perp,wt4kq$tt Univeryltds,'sut itrery:titWilkw

hqllWa

nereha firnsih ,rterliliki ha* eoWtghl atas kaqya t*sebut

**

_{l(grgaafuiiiu*arpilkin:,lwlonalju&tld@4sb-e,Pillltw,ttd,W$ffie$pirtfuWotrpeSelasailal*orwtullsdffiperrbfnbWn}

&*enhndlih

Demikian pernyataan ini saya buat dengan sebenarnya.

Salatiga,

3 Juni

201{

Nadia

Anandq tlerianto

Tando tmgor & nona tetmrg rnalusisva

Mengetahui,

Tando tongan & nanra termg pembimbing I

F-LtB-081

(3)

ffi

PERNYATAAN

PERSETUJUAN AKSES

Nadiq Anandq

Herianlo Nama

NIM

Fakultas

Judul tugas akhir

112,0100?4 Email

Program Studi

Bahasa

don

Sasira

:

tl20lootq

:

Pendiairan

Bahara ln49ric

in

Anon.4mrus

Online

Digcussion

Dengan

ini

-

ini

dengan

M ,.

ke

E

b.

*

hqllWa

**

&*enhndlih

Salatiga,

3 Juni

201{

Nadia

Anandq tlerianto

Mengetahui,

F-LtB-081

(4)

ffi

PERNYATAAN

PERSETUJUAN AKSES

Nadiq Anandq

Herianlo Nama

NIM

Fakultas

Judul tugas akhir

112,0100?4 Email

Program Studi

Bahasa

don

Sasira

:

tl20lootq

:

Pendiairan

Bahara ln49ric

in

Anon.4mrus

Online

Digcussion

Dengan

ini

-

ini

dengan

M ,.

ke

E

b.

*

hqllWa

**

&*enhndlih

Salatiga,

3 Juni

201{

Nadia

Anandq tlerianto

Mengetahui,

F-LtB-081

Tofia tangan & nama terong pembimbing IlywtsroniedcbaYUTSRPONMLKIHGEDCA

POLITENESS STRATEGIES IN

ANONYMOUS ONLINE DISCUSSION

Nadia Ananda Herianto

Abstract

Few studies about the uses of politeness strategies in anonymous online

discussions have been conducted. This study wants to find out about the

politeness strategies used in anonymous online discussion. Brown and Levinson

(1987) stated that one of the factors affecting the uses of politeness is the intimacy

between participants. Many studies find that all kinds of strategies are present in

anonymous discussion, however in various frequencies (Gil-Salom and

Soler-Monreal, 2009; Hsieh, 2009). In this study, observation was used. Five topics

were chosen from a website that provides anonymous environment. The

participants were people who commented on the topics. The comments were

classified into different strategies

using Brown and Levinson’s politeness

(1987).

Off-record and bald-on record strategies were used in many statements. As

previous studies have suggested (Nissenbaum, 1999; Stein, 2003; Chang, 2003;

Farrall, 2012), the participants tended to use these strategies because anonymity

provides the freedom of expressing opinions. Positive and negative politeness

were present in the discussion. Positive politeness were used more often than

negative politeness. However, n

ot all of Brown and Levinson’s strategies

(1987)appear in anonymous online discussion. An interesting finding is that there

were the uses of swear words. According to Dynel (2012), the uses of swear

words is one of impoliteness strategies. Previous studies found that impoliteness

often appears in discussion because of the anonymous environment (Smith, 1999;

Danet, 2001).

From the findings, it was found that not all Brown and Levinson’s

strategies can be found in anonymous online discussion.