• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

S ING 1201025 Table Of Conten

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "S ING 1201025 Table Of Conten"

Copied!
4
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Dedeh Rohayati, 2014

Students’ critical thinking in writing An english exposition text (a case study in a private university in ciamis)

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu |perpustakaan.upi.edu

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

APPROVAL PAGE ………... i

DECLARATION ……….... ii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ………. iii

ABSTRACT ………...... iv

TABLE OF CONTENTS ………... v

LIST OF TABLES ………. viii

CHAPTERI: INTRODUCTION 1.1Background of The Study ………... 1

1.2 Aims of the Research ………. 3

1.3 Research Questions ... 3

1.4 Scope of The Study ... 3

1.5 The Significanceof The Study ... 4

1.6 The Definitions of Terms ... 4

1.7Thesis Organization ... 4

CHAPTERII: LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 Definitions of Critical Thinking ……… 6

2.2 Elements of Critical Thinking in Writing an EnglishExposition Text…………... 7

2.2.1 Issue …...………..………. 7

2.2.2Thesis ……….………..………. 8

2.2.3Argument………..………….. ………... 9

2.2.4 Reason ………..…………...……….. 11

2.2.5 Evidence ………..………..……….………... 12

2.2.6 Opinion ………..………...………. 13

2.3 Critical Thinking Standards ……….……….. 14

2.4 Critical Thinking Dispositions………..………... 15

2.5Fallacies ……….... 16

2.6 Critical Thinking Assessment ……… 17

2.7 Definitions of Writing ……… 18

2.8 Characteristics of Writing ……….. 19

2.9 Principles of Teaching Writing ……….. 19

2.10 Argumentative Essay ……..…... 20

2.11 Exposition Text …………..………..…... 21

2.12 Linguistics Features of Argumentative Essay ………... 22

2.13 Previous Research on Critical Thinking ………. 24

2.14 Conclusion ……….……….. 27

CHAPTERIII: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 3.1Research Designand Method ... 28

(2)

Dedeh Rohayati, 2014

Students’ critical thinking in writing An english exposition text (a case study in a private university in ciamis)

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu |perpustakaan.upi.edu

3.3 Research Participants ………..……….. 29

3.4 Data Collections ……….……… 30

3.4.1 Text Document of Students’ Exposition Texts ..………. 30

3.4.2 Interview ………. 32

3.4.3 Triangulation ……….. 32

3.5 Data Analysis ………..……….. 33

3.5.1 Analyzing Students’ Exposition Texts ………... 33

3.5. 2 Analyzing Interview Data …………..………... 37

3.6 Conclusion ……….. 38

CHAPTERIV: DATA PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION 4.1 Discussion of Analysis of Exposition Texts Written by Students ………. 39

4.1.1 Analysis of Text 1.1 ………. 39

4.1.1.1 The Schematic Structure and Purpose of Text 1.1 ………... 41

4.1.1.2 Linguistic Features of Text 1.1 ……… 47

4.1.1.3 Fallacies in Text 1.1 ………. 49

4.1.2 Analysis of Text 1.2 …………...……….. 50

4.1.2.1 The Schematic Structure and Purpose of Text 1.2 ………... 51

4.1.2.2 Linguistic Features of Text 1.2 ……… 56

4.1.2.3 Fallacies in Text 1.2 ……….… 58

4.1.3 Analysis of Text 1.3 ………. 59

4.1.3.1 The Schematic Structure and Purpose of Text 1.3 ……….….. 60

4.1.3.2 Linguistic Features of Text 1.3 ……… 65

4.1.3.3 Fallacies in Text 1.3 ………. 68

4.2 Summary of Analysis of Exposition Texts Written by Students ………... 69

4.3 Discussion of Analysis Data from Individual Interview.………. 73

4.3.1 Students’ Understanding of the Concept of Critical Thinking ……… 73

4.3.2 Students’ Understanding of Argumentative Essay ………. 79

4.3.3 Students’ Awareness of Potential Values of Critical Thinking in Writing an English Exposition Text ………... 80

4.3.4 Student’s Recommendations of Critical Thinking Development…..………. 82

4.4 The Implication of Research Result for Teachers ………..………... 84

4.5 Conclusion ………..………... 86

CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION OF THE STUDY 5.1 Research Aims …... 87

5.2 Research Questions..………... 87

5.3 Conclusions…………...……...………...………... 87

5.4 Limitation of the Study ...…………...……….. 89

5.5 Conclusion ……….. 90

BIBLIOGRAPHY ……….. 91

(3)

Dedeh Rohayati, 2014

Students’ critical thinking in writing An english exposition text (a case study in a private university in ciamis)

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu |perpustakaan.upi.edu

APPENDIX2: Sample of Students’ Document Texts ………. 100

APPENDIX 3: Elements of Critical Thinking in Text 1.1 ……….. 106

APPENDIX 4 : Elements of Critical Thinking in Text 1.2 ……….. 107

APPENDIX 5 : Elements of Critical Thinking in Text 1.3 ……….. 108

APPENDIX6 : Questions of Interview ………. 109

APPENDIX 7 : The Condensed Version of Interview Data from Low Achiever (Rani) ……… 110

APPENDIX 8 : The Condensed Version of Interview Data from Mid Achiever (Sofi) ……… 111 APPENDIX 9 : The Condensed Version of Interview Data from Low Achiever (Rihana) ..……… 112

(4)

Dedeh Rohayati, 2014

Students’ critical thinking in writing An english exposition text (a case study in a private university in ciamis)

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu |perpustakaan.upi.edu

LIST OF TABLES

Page

Table 2.1 Sample Text of Exposition ……… 23

Table 4.1 Document Text (Text 1.1) ………. 40

Table 4.2 Document Text (Text 1.2) ………. 50

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

TEACHING WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT THROUGH GENRE BASED APPROACH: (A Case Study Research at a Junior High School in Bandung).. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia |

Investigating junior high school students’ Critical thinking in reading.. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu Table

CRITICAL LITERACY IN THE TEACHING OF WRITING HORTATORY EXPOSITION TEXT BASED ON GENRE PEDAGOGY APPROACH.. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu |

Identifying Students’ Ability and Difficulties in Writing Hortatory Exposition Text.. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

Identifying Students’ Ability and Difficulties in Writing Hortatory Exposition Text.. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

Identifying Students’ Ability and Difficulties in Writing Hortatory Exposition Text.. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

IMPLEMENTING MIND MAPPING TECHNIQUE IN THE PROCESS-BASED APPROACH TO TEACH WRITING HORTATORY EXPOSITION TEXT.. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu

4.1.1 The Mechanism Used By Teacher to Foster Critical Thinking in the Classroom