• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

S ING 1201025 Table Of Conten

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "S ING 1201025 Table Of Conten"

Copied!
4
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Dedeh Rohayati, 2014

Students’ critical thinking in writing An english exposition text (a case study in a private university in ciamis)

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu |perpustakaan.upi.edu

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

APPROVAL PAGE ………... i

DECLARATION ……….... ii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ………. iii

ABSTRACT ………...... iv

TABLE OF CONTENTS ………... v

LIST OF TABLES ………. viii

CHAPTERI: INTRODUCTION 1.1Background of The Study ………... 1

1.2 Aims of the Research ………. 3

1.3 Research Questions ... 3

1.4 Scope of The Study ... 3

1.5 The Significanceof The Study ... 4

1.6 The Definitions of Terms ... 4

1.7Thesis Organization ... 4

CHAPTERII: LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 Definitions of Critical Thinking ……… 6

2.2 Elements of Critical Thinking in Writing an EnglishExposition Text…………... 7

2.2.1 Issue …...………..………. 7

2.2.2Thesis ……….………..………. 8

2.2.3Argument………..………….. ………... 9

2.2.4 Reason ………..…………...……….. 11

2.2.5 Evidence ………..………..……….………... 12

2.2.6 Opinion ………..………...………. 13

2.3 Critical Thinking Standards ……….……….. 14

2.4 Critical Thinking Dispositions………..………... 15

2.5Fallacies ……….... 16

2.6 Critical Thinking Assessment ……… 17

2.7 Definitions of Writing ……… 18

2.8 Characteristics of Writing ……….. 19

2.9 Principles of Teaching Writing ……….. 19

2.10 Argumentative Essay ……..…... 20

2.11 Exposition Text …………..………..…... 21

2.12 Linguistics Features of Argumentative Essay ………... 22

2.13 Previous Research on Critical Thinking ………. 24

2.14 Conclusion ……….……….. 27

CHAPTERIII: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 3.1Research Designand Method ... 28

(2)

Dedeh Rohayati, 2014

Students’ critical thinking in writing An english exposition text (a case study in a private university in ciamis)

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu |perpustakaan.upi.edu

3.3 Research Participants ………..……….. 29

3.4 Data Collections ……….……… 30

3.4.1 Text Document of Students’ Exposition Texts ..………. 30

3.4.2 Interview ………. 32

3.4.3 Triangulation ……….. 32

3.5 Data Analysis ………..……….. 33

3.5.1 Analyzing Students’ Exposition Texts ………... 33

3.5. 2 Analyzing Interview Data …………..………... 37

3.6 Conclusion ……….. 38

CHAPTERIV: DATA PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION 4.1 Discussion of Analysis of Exposition Texts Written by Students ………. 39

4.1.1 Analysis of Text 1.1 ………. 39

4.1.1.1 The Schematic Structure and Purpose of Text 1.1 ………... 41

4.1.1.2 Linguistic Features of Text 1.1 ……… 47

4.1.1.3 Fallacies in Text 1.1 ………. 49

4.1.2 Analysis of Text 1.2 …………...……….. 50

4.1.2.1 The Schematic Structure and Purpose of Text 1.2 ………... 51

4.1.2.2 Linguistic Features of Text 1.2 ……… 56

4.1.2.3 Fallacies in Text 1.2 ……….… 58

4.1.3 Analysis of Text 1.3 ………. 59

4.1.3.1 The Schematic Structure and Purpose of Text 1.3 ……….….. 60

4.1.3.2 Linguistic Features of Text 1.3 ……… 65

4.1.3.3 Fallacies in Text 1.3 ………. 68

4.2 Summary of Analysis of Exposition Texts Written by Students ………... 69

4.3 Discussion of Analysis Data from Individual Interview.………. 73

4.3.1 Students’ Understanding of the Concept of Critical Thinking ……… 73

4.3.2 Students’ Understanding of Argumentative Essay ………. 79

4.3.3 Students’ Awareness of Potential Values of Critical Thinking in Writing an English Exposition Text ………... 80

4.3.4 Student’s Recommendations of Critical Thinking Development…..………. 82

4.4 The Implication of Research Result for Teachers ………..………... 84

4.5 Conclusion ………..………... 86

CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION OF THE STUDY 5.1 Research Aims …... 87

5.2 Research Questions..………... 87

5.3 Conclusions…………...……...………...………... 87

5.4 Limitation of the Study ...…………...……….. 89

5.5 Conclusion ……….. 90

BIBLIOGRAPHY ……….. 91

(3)

Dedeh Rohayati, 2014

Students’ critical thinking in writing An english exposition text (a case study in a private university in ciamis)

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu |perpustakaan.upi.edu

APPENDIX2: Sample of Students’ Document Texts ………. 100

APPENDIX 3: Elements of Critical Thinking in Text 1.1 ……….. 106

APPENDIX 4 : Elements of Critical Thinking in Text 1.2 ……….. 107

APPENDIX 5 : Elements of Critical Thinking in Text 1.3 ……….. 108

APPENDIX6 : Questions of Interview ………. 109

APPENDIX 7 : The Condensed Version of Interview Data from Low Achiever (Rani) ……… 110

APPENDIX 8 : The Condensed Version of Interview Data from Mid Achiever (Sofi) ……… 111 APPENDIX 9 : The Condensed Version of Interview Data from Low Achiever (Rihana) ..……… 112

(4)

Dedeh Rohayati, 2014

Students’ critical thinking in writing An english exposition text (a case study in a private university in ciamis)

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu |perpustakaan.upi.edu

LIST OF TABLES

Page

Table 2.1 Sample Text of Exposition ……… 23

Table 4.1 Document Text (Text 1.1) ………. 40

Table 4.2 Document Text (Text 1.2) ………. 50

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

[r]

PENDERITA DM DAN HIPERTENSI PADA GGK STAGE 5 YANG MENJALANI HEMODIALISIS DI KLINIK RASYIDA MEDAN TAHUN 2011. Nama

Penerapan Multimedia Pembelajaran Untuk Mneingkatkan Motivasi Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa XI TKR 1 SMKN 6 Bandung Pada Mata Pelajaran Produktif Motor.. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

[r]

PERBAND INGAN WAKTU AKTIF BELAJAR SISWA ANTARA PROSES BELAJAR MENGAJAR FUTSAL IND OOR D ENGAN OUTD OOR PAD A SISWA SMAN 1 TASIKMALAYA1. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia |

PENGGUNAAN OPEN-GUIDED INQUIRY WORKSHEET DALAM PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS MASALAH UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEGIATAN OSEAN DAN PRESTASI BELAJAR SISWA SMP.. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia |

Engagement >>>>> contracting.. award the entity that exerts the representation of the public service must request to the court or the competent organ that the nullity

dilakukan seseorang dapat dilihat dari hasil yang telah dicapai dalam. belajar, yaitu berupa