N
I
N
O
I
S
I
C
E
D
S
’
N
A
I
R
A
N
I
M
E
S
A
F
O
L
A
Y
A
R
T
R
O
P
A
N
I
A
M
E
H
T
H
G
U
O
R
H
T
L
L
A
C
E
H
T
G
N
I
D
N
O
P
S
E
R
S
’
O
H
L
E
O
C
O
L
U
A
P
N
I
S
R
E
T
C
A
R
A
H
C
T
P
E
W
D
N
A
N
W
O
D
T
A
S
I
,
A
R
D
E
I
P
R
E
V
I
R
E
H
T
Y
B
S I S E H T E T A U D A R G R E D N U N A
s t n e m e ri u q e R e h t f o t n e m ll if l u F l a it r a P s a d e t n e s e r P
fort heDegreeo fSarjanaSastra inEngilshLetters
y B
it s e m a r P a k i R a is e r e h T a i r a
M
0 : r e b m u N t n e d u t
S 6421403 6
E M M A R G O R P Y D U T S S R E T T E L H S I L G N E
S R E T T E L H S I L G N E F O T N E M T R A P E D
S R E T T E L F O Y T L U C A F
Y T I S R E V I N U A M R A H D A T A N A S
A T R A K A Y G O Y
i
N
I
N
O
I
S
I
C
E
D
S
’
N
A
I
R
A
N
I
M
E
S
A
F
O
L
A
Y
A
R
T
R
O
P
A
N
I
A
M
E
H
T
H
G
U
O
R
H
T
L
L
A
C
E
H
T
G
N
I
D
N
O
P
S
E
R
S
’
O
H
L
E
O
C
O
L
U
A
P
N
I
S
R
E
T
C
A
R
A
H
C
T
P
E
W
D
N
A
N
W
O
D
T
A
S
I
,
A
R
D
E
I
P
R
E
V
I
R
E
H
T
Y
B
S I S E H T E T A U D A R G R E D N U N A
s t n e m e ri u q e R e h t f o t n e m ll if l u F l a it r a P s a d e t n e s e r P
fort heDegreeo fSarjanaSastra inEngilshLetters
y B
it s e m a r P a k i R a is e r e h T a i r a
M
0 : r e b m u N t n e d u t
S 6421403 6
E M M A R G O R P Y D U T S S R E T T E L H S I L G N E
S R E T T E L H S I L G N E F O T N E M T R A P E D
S R E T T E L F O Y T L U C A F
Y T I S R E V I N U A M R A H D A T A N A S
A T R A K A Y G O Y
v i
l
u
f
n
i
a
p
s
i
g
n
it
i
a
W
l
u
f
n
i
a
p
s
i
g
n
it
t
e
g
r
o
F
d
n
i
k
t
s
r
o
w
e
h
t
si
o
d
o
t
h
ci
h
w
g
n
i
w
o
n
k
t
o
n
,
t
u
B
o
f
s
u
f
f
e
ir
n
g
)
o
h
le
o
C
o
l
u
a
P
(
u
o
y
m
r
o
f
s
n
a
r
t
o
t
s
d
n
u
o
w
r
u
o
y
w
o
ll
a
t
’
n
o
D
t
o
n
e
r
a
u
o
y
e
n
o
e
m
o
s
o
t
n
i
)
o
h
le
o
C
o
l
u
a
P
(
e
v
il
a
t
s
o
m
e
r
a
e
W
e
v
o
l
n
i
e
r’
e
w
n
e
h
W
v
I
d
e
d
ci
a
t
e
t
h
i
s
u
n
d
e
r
g
r
a
d
u
a
t
e
t
h
e
s
si
t
:o
t
si
r
h
C
s
u
s
e
J
,
r
o
t
a
v
it
o
M
t
s
e
t
a
e
r
G
y
M
e
b
y
M
l
o
v
e
d
p
a
r
e
n
t
s
r
e
h
t
o
r
b
t
s
e
r
a
e
d
y
M
s
e
v
o
l
y
M
i v
S T N E M E G D E L W O N K C A
Frislty , Iwould ilke t o t hank Jesu sCh irs,t t he Greates tMoitvato rfo rme m a I n e h w s m e l b o r p y m g n i v l o s n i e m g n i p l e h d n a s g n i s s e l b s i H r o f , y a d s i h t li t n u
h e H . s i s e h t s i h t g n i o
d a sblessed meal ldayandHi sblessing neve rstopsf o rme . k
n a h
T Godf orl ovingmeuncondiitonally.
k n a h t o t e k il d l u o w I , y l d n o c e
S to my parents ,fo rthei rsuppo tr ,thei r y m k n a h t d l u o w I . e m r o f e v o l g n i d n e r e v e n r i e h t d n a , e c n e it a p r i e h t , n o it n e tt a
t n u
a and my cousin sfo rthei rsuppo tr ,advice and thei rcare when Iwa sin a I
. n o it a u ti s t l u c if fi
d also would ilket o t hank my wholefamliy fort hei rhelp and .
s i s e h t e t a u d a r g r e d n u s i h t g n i h s i n if n i tr o p p u s
h
T ridly , Iwould ilke to thank my advisor ,Advenitna Pu rtanit , S.S,. e
c n a d i u g r e h d n a e c n e it a p r e h r o f , . m u H .
M when Iwas doing my t hesi swtih so
m e l b o r p y n a
m s tha t Ihaveso fa.r Thank so much fo rh eradvicedu irng guiding g
n i o d s a w I n e h w e
m my t hesis ,Mrs .Purtanit .My big grattiudealsogoest o my o
c -adviso rDrs .Hrimawan Wjianarka ,M .Hum. who ha sgiven hi s itmet o read .s
i s e h t e t a u d a r g r e d n u y m n o k c e h c d n
a O fcourse Iwould ilket osayt hankyou so h
c u
m toallt hes ecretarys tafff o rallt hei rhe . lp
k n a h t l a i c e p s y
M goe sto my firend sGaby ,Pipiet ,Siska ,Risca ,Haryo , ,
a m m E , it p e S , li r p A , r e h t s
E and Chocofo rallt hei rsuppo tri n my study and also d
n A . e fi l l a n o s r e p y m n
i t o al lmy f irend stha t Icanno tmeniton one by one s
r e tt e L h s il g n E n i s d n e ir f y m y ll a i c e p s
ii v
k n a h t g i b y m t s a e l t o n t u b t s a l e h T . tr o p p u s s s e l d n e s i h d n a r e y a r
p i sfo rMrs .
e m g n i w o ll a r o f y li m a f s ’i t a ir ti
F ot ilvei n t hei rhousef o rsevera lnight sand also p
p u s r i e h t r o
f or tand praye r fo rme .And my l ast t hank i sfo rsomeone t ha tha s s
s e n i p p a h y m k c a b t h g u o r
b andr aisedmyhope.
ii i v
H A I M L I A Y R A K I S A K I L B U P N A U J U T E S R E P N A A T A Y N R E P R A B M E L
S I M E D A K A N A G N I T N E P E K K U T N U
a
Y ngbetrandat angand ibawahi n,is ayamahasiswaUniverstia sSanataDharma:
a m a
N :MairaTheresiaRikaPramesit a
w s i s a h a M r o m o
N :064214036
n a a k a t s u p r e P a d a p e k n a k ir e b m e m a y a s , n a u h a t e g n e p u m li n a g n a b m e g n e p i m e D
s h a i m li a y r a k a m r a h D a t a n a S s a ti s r e v i n
U ayayangbejrudu :l
A OP RTRAYALOFASEMINARIAN’SDECISIONI NRESPONDING L
L A C E H
T THROUGHTHEMAINCHARACTERSINPAULO S
’ O H L E O C
T P E W D N A N W O D T A S I , A R D E I P R E V I R E H T Y B
n a k ir e b m e m a y a s n a i k i m e d n a g n e D . ) a d a a li b ( n a k u lr e p i d g n a y t a k g n a r e p a tr e s e B
P a d a p e
k erpustakaan Universtia s Sanata Dharma hak untuk menyimpan , n a l a k g n a p k u t n e b m a l a d a y n a l o l e g n m , n i a l a i d e m k u t n e b m a l a d n a k h il a g n e m
t e n r e t n i i d a y n n a k i s a k il b u p m e m n a d , s a t a b r e t a r a c e s a y n n a k i s u b ir t s i d n e m , a t a d
p n a t s i m e d a k a n a g n it n e p e k k u t n u n i a l a i d e m u a t
a a pelru meminta i zin dar isaya
a y a s a m a n n a k m u t n a c n e m p a t e t a m a l e s a y a s a d a p e k i tl a y o r i r e b m e m n u p u a m
.s il u n e p i a g a b e s
. a y n r a n e b e s n a g n e d t a u b a y a s i n i n a a t a y n r e p n a i k i m e D
a tr a k a y g o Y i d t a u b i D
: l a g g n a t a d a
P 11J anuair 12 3 0 n
a k a t a y n e m g n a Y
h T a ir a M
x i
Y T I L A N I G I R O S ’ K R O W F O T N E M E T A T S
h t s i h t t a h t d e r a l c e d y lt s e n o h
I esis ,A Portraya lo fASeminarian’ sDecision i n s ’ o h l e o C o l u a P n i s r e t c a r a h C n i a M e h T h g u o r h T l l a C e h t g n i d n o p s e
R Byt he
t p e W d n a n w o D t a S I , a r d e i P r e v i
R ,which I havew irtten ,doe sno tcontain t he d n a s n o it a t o u q e h t n i d e ti c e s o h t t p e c x e , e l p o e p r e h t o f o k r o w e h t f o s tr a p r o k r o w
. d l u o h s r e p a p c if it n e i c s a s a , s e c n e r e f e r
, a tr a k a y g o
Y 10J anuair 12 3 0
x E L B A
T OFCONTENTS E
G A P E L T I
T ... E
G A P L A V O R P P
A ... E
G A P E C N A T P E C C
A ... E
G A P O T T O
M ... E
G A P N O I T A C I D E
D ... S
T N E M E G D E L W O N K C
A ... I
S A K I L B U P N A A T A Y N R E P R A B M E
L ... Y
T I L A N I G I R O S ’ K R O W F O T N E M E T A T
S ... S
T N E T N O C F O E L B A
T ... T
C A R T S B
A ... K
A R T S B
A ... i
ii ii i
v i v
i v
ii v
ii i v x
ii x
ii i x N
O I T C U D O R T N I : I R E T P A H
C ... .
A Backgroundoft heStudy ... .
B ProblemFormulaiton. ... .
C Objecitve soft heStudy. ... .
D Deifniitono fTerm s... 1 1 5 5 6 W
E I V E R L A C I T E R O E H T : I I R E T P A H
C ... .
A Reviewo fRelatedStudy. ... .
B Reviewo fRelatedTheo ire s... .
1 Theoryo fCharacte randCharacteirzaiton. ... .
2 Theoryo fConfilct. ... .
a Interna lConfilct. ... .
b Externa lConfilct. ... .
C Theoreitca lFramework. ... 7 7 9 9 1 1
2 1
3 1
5 1 Y
G O L O D O H T E M : I I I R E T P A H
C ... .
A Objec toft heStudy. ... .
B Approachoft heStudy... .
C Methodoft heStudy... 6 1
6 1
7 1
8 1 S
I S Y L A N A : V I R E T P A H
C ... .
A TheAuthor’ sDescirpitonaboutt heMainCharacters. ... .
1 Plia r... .
2 Pliar’ sChlidhoodF irend. ... .
B TheConfilct soft heMainCharacters. ... .
1 Pliar’ sConfilct. ... .
2 Pliar’ sChlidhoodF irend’ sConfilcts. ... .
C Porrtaya l o f A Seminairan’ s Decision in Responding the Cal l .. .. .. .. . d n e ir F d o o h d li h C r e H d n a r a li P n e e w t e b s t c il f n o C e h t h g u o r h t
0 2
0 2
0 2
3 3
7 3
7 3
2 4
4 4 N
O I S U L C N O C : V R E T P A H
i x Y
H P A R G O I L B I
B ... 52 X
I D N E P P
A ... f
o y r a m m u S e h
1 I R E T P A H C
N O I T C U D O R T N I
.
A Backgroundoft heStudy
Att hef ris titmewhent hewrtie rwantst o ifndoutt hede ifniitonofl tierature ,
e m o s m o r f e r u t a r e ti l f o n o it i n if e d e m o s e r a e r e h T . d e s u f n o c s t e g r e ti r w e h t
il t u o b a w e i v f o t n i o p n w o r i e h t e v a h y e h T . s r o h t u
a teraturebu tactuallyt heyhave
e m a s e h
t idea.
s i e r u t a r e ti
L group o f ifciton ,poem ,and plays .Mos to fltierary works
e b ir c s e
d et h reailite sof l fie .They show sadness ,happines ,s l ove ,death ,murder ,
t c e lf e r y e h t s e m it e m o S . e r o m y n a m d n a , ri a f f
a wha thappen i n l fie .“Ltieraturei s
e v a h t a h t n o it a u ti s n o d e s a b e b y a m t I . e fi l n a m u h f o s h t u rt e h t o t d e t a l e
r occurred
8 9 1 , s b o c a J & t r e b o R ( ” .r u c c o r e v e n y a m h c i h w d n
a 7 :2) .Reading l tieraturecan
. d lr o w s i h t t u o b a e c n e ir e p x e d n a e g d e l w o n k r u o h c ir n e
g n i d r o c c
A to Rober tand Jacobs ,Ltierature ha srelaiton wtih human l fie. I t
e h t f o n o it p ir c s e d a e b n a c e r u t a r e ti L . d n i k n a m u h f o e fi l h t u rt e h t e b ir c s e d
n o it a u ti
s tha thappens ,ha shappened ,wli lhappened ,o rneve rhappens .Someitme s
e h t s a d e s u e b n a c e r u t a r e ti
l ciritcismoft hecondiitoni nace trainera.
e r a y e h T . s e r n e g n i a m e e r h t s a h e r u t a r e ti
L ifciton ,poerty ,anddrama. They
r i e h t e v a
h o wnspecialtyt ha tmake speoplei nterested t or eadi .t I n t hist hesi ,st he
l e v o n a e z y l a n a o t s e d i c e d r e ti r
w insteado fotherl tierary work sbecausenove sli
e h t d n a , m e l b o r p e h t , r e t c a r a h c e h t g n i b ir c s e d n i d e li a t e d d n a e t e l p m o c e r o m
y e h t e li h w n o it o m e ’ s r e d a e r e h t e c n e u lf n i n a c t c il f n o c f o e c n e t s i s x e e h t , y lt c e ri d n I
. y r o t s e h t d a e r
e h t s t n e s e r p e r l e v o n a “ , e n ir r e P y b d e t a t s s
A imtiaitononman’ sdayl fieand
e r f o e g a m i n a s r e f f o d n a y a w l a r u t a n a n i s r e n n a
m al l fie.”(Perirne ,1966: 76) ,
s a h o s l a h c i h w e fi l y r a n i d r o s ’ e l p o e p t u o b a s ll e t l e v o
n confilcts ,feeilngs ,and
e r a y e h T . y r o t s e h t f o c i p o t e h t o t g n i d r o c c a s e p y t y n a m s a h o s l a l e v o N . s m e l b o r p
, n o it c if e c n e i c s , r e ll ir h t , e c n a m o
r and many more .Every novel ha s ti s own
q i n
u uenes saccording to the authors ’way to expres sthe idea. One o fthe good
s r o h t u
a whohave rwittenmanygoodnovelsi sPauloCoelho.
s i o h l e o C o l u a
P aBraziilanauthor .Hei soneof theauthor swho wrtieal o t
s i h f o t s o M . s l e v o n t a e r g f
o novel sbecome best-selilng book sso the wrtie r
t s e b s i h f o e n o s e s o o h
c -selilng bookst o beanalyzed .Among hi sfamou snovels ,
s e s o o h c r e ti r w e h
t Byt heRive rPiedra ISa tDownandWepttoanalyzef u trhe.r ,
k o o b s i
H By the Rive rPiedra ISa tDown and Wept ,i sfris tpubilshed in s
i ti e s u a c e b d e z y l a n a e b o t k o o b s i h t s e s o o h c r e ti r w e h T . 4 9 9
1 very i nteresitng
y r e v d n a k o o
b interesitngs tory .Thi sbooki sabou tas weetl oves tory andhowt he
. r a e f r e h m o r f s e l g g u rt s r e t c a r a h c n i a m
t u o b a s ll e t k o o b s i h t y lt s o
M theconfilc tof t hemain characterto ifnd thei r
e fi l f o e s o p r u
p . tIi sal ovestoryaboutt wochlidhood f irend swhowereseparated
r o
f long itmeand nowt heymee tagain t ogaint heril ove.Thewrtie r ifndsl ot so f
b a s ll e t m o d s i w e h T . l e v o n s i h t n i m o d s i
w outl ove,s acir ifce ,devoitont oGod ,and
e s o o h c r e ti r w e h t , e v o b a s n o it a n i a l p x e e m o s e h t o t d e t a l e
R s toanalyzet ha t
d e lt it n e l e v o
n ByTheRive rPiedra ISa tDownandWep .tA tfert hewrtierr eadt he r
o t s e l o h
w y,t hewrtie rcanseetheconfilc tbetweenPlia randhe rchlidhoodf irend
g n i d n o p s e r t u o b a n o i s i c e d a g n i k a m n i d n e ir f d o o h d li h c r e h e c n e u lf n i y ll a n if t a h t
s e b ir c s e d r o h t u a e h t w o h t u o b a g n it s e r e t n i s i r e ti r w e h T . n a ir a n i m e s a s a l l a c e h t
i h c r e h d n a r a li
P ldhood f irend i n t he wholestory .This t opicwli lbeanalyzed by
. r e ti r w e h
t I s ti interesitngt obeanalyzed .
o t s s i h t n
I ry ,Pliar i sdesc irbed a saperson who i sl ack o fcon ifdence .She
s a p e h t n i y r o t s e v o l c it a m u a rt a s a
h t ,bu tshei srtyingt obet ough .Thewrtie rwli l
f o n o it p ir c s e d e h t e v r e s b
o theautho rabou tPlia ra soneoft hemain charactersi n
. l e v o n e h
t The wrtie r also want s to know wha t happen s to Plia ra tfe r he r
s n e p p a h t a h w d n a r e h t f e l d n e ir f d o o h d li h
c when11yearsl ate rdesitnyb irngst he
. n i a g a r e h t e g o t s r e v o l
r a li P , g n i n n i g e b e h t n
I i sdescirbed a saweak person who ha sa rtaumaitc
h g u o t e b o t g n i y rt s i e h s , n e h T . t s a p e h t n i y r o t s e v o
l .11 year slate rwhen she
. r o f g n it i a w s i e h s m o h w d n e ir f d o o h d li h c r e h h ti w n i a g a s t e e
m The confilct
n i d n e ir f d o o h d li h c r e h t e e m o t n o i n i p o r e h d n e f e d o t s tr a t s r a li P n e h w s n i g e b
. d ir d a
M The confilc t happen s to he r along he r journey accompanying he r
d n e ir f d o o h d li h
c hast augh ther t o bet ough .Then, t hrough her j ourney wtih he r
h t y n a m s n r a e l e h s , r e v o
l ings .Through the journey ,Plia ralso can change he r
. n o i s i c e d s ’ d n e ir f d o o h d li h
c In t he beginning i tseem sdfiifcul tfo rPliari fshe i s
. n a ir a n i m e s a e b l li t s l li w e h d n a d n e ir f d o o h d li h c r e h y b n i a g a t f e
l Finally ,he r
n a y r a n i m e s s e v a e l d n e ir f d o o h d li h
.
B ProblemFormula iton
s ’ r e ti r w e h t f o n o it c e ri d e h t e n i m r e t e d l li w s n o it s e u q g n i w o ll o f e h T
: s i s y l a n a
.
1 Howdoest heautho rdescirbeP lia randhe rchlidhoodf irend?
.
2 Wha taret heconfilct so fP lia randhe rchlidhoodf irend?
.
3 How do the confilct sbetween Plia rand he rchlidhood firend p r yo rt a a
a g n i k a m n i n a ir a n i m e
s decisioni nr espondingt hecall?
.
C Objecitves oft heStudy s
a h y d u t s s i h
T three problem formulaitons ,so i talso ha sthree objecitves .
t u o d n if o t s i e v it c e j b o t s ri f e h
T how t heautho rdescirbe sthemain characters i n
y r o t s e h
t ,PauloCoelho’ sByt heRive rPiedra ISa tDown andWept .Int hi sstory d
n e ir f d o o h d li h c r e h d n a r a li P e r a s r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h
t .Thesecondobjecitvei sto
t u o d n
if theconfilct soft hemain character sin t hi sstory .Themaincharactersi n
. t c il f n o c l a n r e t x e d n a l a n r e t n i e v a h , d n e ir f d o o h d li h c r e h d n a r a li P , y r o t s s i h
t The
e h t t u o d n if o t s i e v it c e j b o d ri h
t po rtaya lo fasemina iran i n making adecisioni n
e w t e b s t c il f n o c e h t h g u o r h t ll a c e h t g n i d n o p s e
r en Plia rand he rch lidhood firend .
n o i s i c e d s i h e c n e u lf n i ll i w t c il f n o c s i h
T inr esponding t hecal la saseminairan. I t
e h t d n o p s e r o t n o i s i c e d a e k a m o t s a h e h n e h w n a ir a n i m e s a f o l a y a rt o p a e b n a c
.t s e ir p a e b o t ll a
.
D Deifni itono fTerms e
r a e r e h
T t ow termst ha tareused i n t he itlteand t heproblemformulaiton .
r e t c a r a h c : e r a y e h
T andconfilct.
.
1 Character
r e t c a r a h
C s aremos to tfenusedt or efe rapersoni nas toryandcharacter sare
e w s a , s t h g u o h t d n a , t c e l a i d , n o it c a r i e h t h g u o r h t d e t n e s e r p y ll a u s
u l la sby
, g n i e b n a m u h f o n o it a t n e s e r p e r s ’ r o h t u a “ n a o s l a s i r e t c a r a h c A . n o it p ir c s e d
s t c a e r l a u d i v i d n i n a w o h e n i m r e t e d t a h t s e it il a u q r e n n i e s o h t f o , y ll a c if i c e p s
t n e m n o ri v n e s i h r o r e h e p a h s o t s t p m e tt a s n o it i d n o c s u o ir a v o
t .”(Robetrs ,
9 6 9 1 : )45
.
2 Confilct
“Confilc ti sa srtuggle which grow sou to fthe interplay o ftwo opposing
t o l p a n i s e c r o
7
I I R E T P A H C
W E I V E R L A C I T E R O E H T .
A Reviewo fRelatedStudies
a f o t n e m p o l e v e d r e t c a r a h c t u o b a s s u c s i d d n a e ti r w o s l a e l p o e p e m o S
e h t , y d u t s s i h t n I . s y a w t n e r e f fi d n i d n a s l e v o n t n e r e f fi d m o r f r e t c a r a h c n i a tr e c
w s e i d u t s r e h t o h ti w y d u t s r e h e r a p m o c l li w r e ti r
w hichhavesimliart opicwtiht he
s i h w r e ti r w e h t h ti w c i p o t r a li m i s e v a h t a h t s i s e h t o w t s e s o o h c r e ti r w e h T . r e ti r w
t u o b a s
i confilct .The fris tone i sthe undergraduate thesi sfrom Sr iSaraswat i
d e lt it n
e The Inlfuence o fConfilct sUpon the Main Characte rDevelopmen tin m
a il li W e e s s e n n e
T The Roman Sp irng o fMr .sStone .The Second one i sthe m
o r f s i s e h t e t a u d a r g r e d n
u Heirbetru s Vendykurniawan Purta enitlted The n i t n e m p o l e v e D y ti l a n o s r e P ’ s k c i H l a m a J d r a w o t s t c il f n o C f o n o it u b i r t n o C
s ’ s r e y M n a e D r e tl a
W Scorpions.
it a w s a r a S i r
S (2006 )discussed abou tthe in lfuence o fconfilct supon the
t n e m p o l e v e d r e t c a r a h c n i a
m in hert hesi senitltedTheI nlfuenceo fConfilct sUpon ’
s m a il li W e e s s e n n e T n i t n e m p o l e v e D r e t c a r a h C n i a M e h
t The Roman Sp irng o f
e n o t S .s r
M .In he rstudy ,she used a work of ltierature by Tennessee Wliilam
d e lt it n
e TheRoman Spring o fMrs .Stone. In her t hesis ,shediscussed about t he n
i a
m characte rdevelopmen twhichisi n lfuencedbyconfilct shappenedt ohe.r
t t s o m l a s i y d u t s f o s u c o f r e
H hesamewtiht hewrtier’ sstudy .Shediscussed
.s t c il f n o c f o e c n e u lf n i e h t t u o b
a Thedfiference sareont heobjec to fstudyandt he
e r a t a h t s t c il f n o
y d u t s s i h n I . h c a o r p p a c it s il a m r o
f Purta analyzed the interna lconfilct sand
s t c il f n o c l a n r e t x
e fo the main characte rwho i sJama lHicks .In he rstudy ,the
r e h d n a r a li P e r a o h w s r e t c a r a h c n i a m o w t f o s t c il f n o c e h t d e z y l a n a r e ti r w
i h
c ldhoodf irend.
. t c il f n o c t u o b a d e s s u c s i d s i s e h t s ’i t a w s a r a S d n a s i s e h t s ’ a rt u P h t o B
y e h t , y d u t s s ’ r e ti r w e h t h ti w d e r a p m o
C discus sabou tthe in lfuence o fconfilc t
t n e m p o l e v e d y ti l a n o s r e p d n a t n e m p o l e v e d r e t c a r a h c d r a w o
t .In he rstudy ,the
s e if i c e p s r e ti r
w the confilc t tha t in lfuence sthe decision o fa seminairan in
r e t c a r a h c s ’ r a li P t u o b a n i a l p x e o s l a r e ti r w e h t h g u o h tl A . ll a c e h t g n i d n o p s e r
, t n e m p o l e v e
d tii snott hemainpoin toft hiss tudy.
.
B Reviewo fRelatedTheories
o t s e ir o e h t e m o s s e il p p a r e ti r w e h
T explain and answe r the problem
: e r a s e ir o e h t e h T . s n o it a l u m r o f
.
1 Theoryo fCharacterandCharacteriza iton
e r u t a r e ti l f o k r o w a f o s t n e m e l e c i s n ir t n i c i s a b e h t f o e n o s a s r e t c a r a h C
m a r b A . e g a s s e m a g n ir b y ll a u s
u s in hi sbook ,A Glossaryo fLtieraryTermssays o h w , k r o w e v it a r r a n r o c it a m a r d a n i d e t n e s e r p s n o s r e p e h t “ e r a s r e t c a r a h c e h t t a h t
d n a , l a n o it i s o p s i d , l a r o m h ti w d e w o d n e g n i e b s a r e d a e r e h t y b d e t e r p r e t n i e r a
. o d y e h t t a h w y b d n a y a s y e h t t a h w n i d e s s e r p x e e r a t a h t s e it il a u q l a n o it o m e
a n i e l o r t n a tr o p m i n a s a
h story .I ti san impo tran taspec tin a story .Arp and
t e t a t s y e h T . t c il f n o c t u o b a n o i n i p o n w o r i e h t e v a h n o s n h o
J hei ropinion i n t hei r
d e lt it n e k o o
b Perrine’ sLtierature :Structure ,Sound ,andSense( TenthEdiiton) .I t ,
t a h t d e t a t s s i
,r e v e w o h , y li r a n i d r O
“ both the surface exctiemen trequried in commercia l e m o s f o t u o e s ir a n o it c if y r a r e ti l n i d n u o f g n i n a e m t n a c if i n g i s e h t d n a n o it c if
t c il f n o c f o t r o
s – a clash o facitons ,ideas ,desries ,o rwill .s”(Arp and ,
n o s n h o
J 2009:104)
a t a h t d e t a t s n o s n h o J d n a p r
A confilc ti sa dispute in acitons ,ideas ,desries ,o r
. ll i
w Theyalsoexplainabou texterna lconfilc tand i nterna lconfilct .Theysayt ha t
, n o s r e p f o p u o r g r o n o s r e p r e h t o t s n i a g a t c il f n o c e v a h n a c r e t c a r a h c
a pysica l
t t s n i a g a t c il f n o c r o , y t e i c o s , e r u t a
n heenvrionment .Theconfilc tcan bephysical ,
.l a r o m r o , l a n o it o m e , l a t n e m
d e lt it n e k o o b r e h n i e n ir r e P o t g n i d r o c c
A Storyand Structure ,shesayst hat , l a c i s y h p t s n i a g a , n a m t s n i a g a t c il f n o c n i e b n a c l e v o n e h t n i r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t “
a f r o y t e i c o s , e r u t a
n te ,and t he confilc tagains thi sown nature such a sphysical ,
: 6 6 9 1 , e n ir r e P ( ” l a r o m r o , l a n o it o m e , l a t n e
m 59) .From Perirne’ sstatement ,the
: e r a y e h T . y r o t s a n i t c il f n o c f o s d n i k o w t e r a e r e h t t a h t s e d i c e d r e ti r w
.
a Interna lConfilct
s i t c il f n o c l a n r e t n
I a confilc tbetween a characte rand hersel/fhimsel fto
n o s r e p a , e fi l e u rt n I . o d o t s t n a w e h / e h s t a h w e d i c e d o t r o e s o p r u p s i h /r e h h c a e r
l a o g s i h /r e h g n i h c a e r n i s s e c o r p n i s i e h / e h s e li h w s m e l b o r p y n a m t n o r f n o c l li w
s r e h h ti w t c il f n o c e v a h l li w e h / e h s d n
a el/fhimsefl .She/hewli lbei nacompilcated
d o o g a d a h s a h d n a , k n u r d a g n i e b p o t s o t , e g n a h c o t s e d i c e d e h n e h t t u b , k n u r d
. e g n a h c r e v e n d n a k n u r d a s y a w l a s i e h t a h t s k n i h t ll it s y t e i c o s e h t n e h t t u b , b o j
t c il f n o c f o e l o r e h t t u o b a d e t a t s s b o c a J d n a s tr e b o
R in aplot .Confilct sand
. t o l p f o t n e m e l e t n a tr o p m i e h t d n a e c n e s s e e h t s i t c il f n o C . d e t a r a p e s e b t o n n a c t o l p
. t o l p a f o e r u t c u rt s a n i t c il f n o c f o n o it i s o p e h t w o h s o s l a s b o c a J d n a s tr e b o
R In
d e lt it n e k o o b r i e h
t Ficiton :An Introduciton to Reading and Wriitng (Second )
n o it i d
E ,Robe tr sandJacob sstated ifveelementsi n t hesrtuctureo faplo.t They :
e r a
.
1 Exposiiton
n o it i s o p x
E i sthe ealry descirpiton abou tthe characters ,the backgrounds ,
. e r u t a r e ti l f o k r o w e h t n i s l a ir e t a m e h t d n
a tI i s ilke t hei nrtoduciton oft he
. y r o t s e h t f o n o it a u ti s e h t d n a r e t c a r a h c
.
2 Compilcaiton
t c il f n o c e h t t r a p s i h t n I . y r o t s a n i t c il f n o c g n i n n i g e b e h t s i n o it a c il p m o C
e h t f o t e s n o e h t r o y r o t s e h t n i t c il f n o c r o j a m e h t f o t e s n o e h t s ii t I . s tr a t s
i n o g a t n a e h t ,t r a p s i h t n I . t o l
p s tand t he protagonis tshows t heri i dea sand
.s e u l a v
.
3 C irsis
d e n e p p a h s a h t a h w n e e w t e b s e t a r a p e s tI . y r o t s a n i t n i o p g n i n r u t e h t s i s i s ir C
.t a h t r e tf a n e p p a h l li w t a h w d n
a C irsisi san aciton t o r esolvet heconfilc.tI t
i n if o t n o i s i c e d a e b n a c y ll a u s u s
.
4 Cilmax
x a m il
C ist het op oft heaciton . tIi st hehight ension oft heconfilct . tIi st he
r o h t u a n a , tr a p s i h t n I .t c il f n o c e h t f o n o it c a p o
t set sallt her es toft heaciton
. y l m ri f
.
5 Resoluiton ,o rDénouement
n o it c a f o t e s a s i n o it u l o s e
R stha twillt aket hestoryt ot heconclusionoft he
. y r o t s e l o h
w Int hi spatrt heconfilc tha smett hedecision andsoluiton .Tha t
. y r o t s e l o h w e h t f o n o i s u l c n o c a o t n i m e h t g n ir b l li w
o c t u o b a g n i s s u c s i d e s u a c e b t o l p t u o b a y r o e h t e m o s s t u p o s l a r e ti r w e h
T nfilc t
.t o l p t u o b a g n i s s u c s i d h ti w d e t a r e p e s e b t o n n a
c Confilc tha sani mpo trantr olei na
g n i e e s t u o h ti w y r o t s a f o t c il f n o c t u o b a s s u c s i d t o n n a c e w , o S . t o l p a f o e r u t c u rt s
. y r o t s t a h t n i t o l p a f o e r u t c u rt s e h t
.
C Theoreitca lFramework
e v o b a s e ir o e h t e h
T areusedt oanswert heproblemf ormulaitoni nt hiss tudy .
a g n i b ir c s e D n i s y a W t n e r e f fi D r u o F t u o b a y r o e h t t s ri f e h t s e s u r e ti r w e h T
r a li P f o s c it s ir e t c a r a h c e h t n i a l p x e o t l e v o N e h t n i r e t c a r a h
C and he rchlidhood
d n e ir
f a sthe main characters in this .The second theory i sabou tthe Theory o f
t c il f n o
C .Thist heory i sused t o i ndicatet heconfilc twhich i sundergoneby Plia r
d n e ir f d o o h d li h c r e h d n
a along t eh i rjourney .They ge tinterna lconfilc tand
o i s i c e d s ’ n a ir a n i m e s a y a rt r o p l li w t a h t t c il f n o c l a n r e t x
l e v o n e h t s a w y d u t s s i h t n i e c r u o s y r a m ir
p By t heRive rPiedra, ISa tSown and t
p e
W rw ittenbyPauloCoelho .Thes econdarys ource sweref roms omebooks ,and .
l e v o n e h t f o s i s y l a n a e h t o t d e t a l e r d n a d e d e e n e r e w h c i h w m s i c it ir c
s e ir o e h t e m o s n i a t n o c t a h t s k o o b e r a r e ti r w e h t y b d e s u e r a t a h t s k o o b e h T
.s i s y l a n a s ’ r e ti r w e h t t r o p p u s n a c t a h
t The wrtie rneed ssome book swhich are
e h t n i r e w s n a e h t n i a l p x e o t s k o o b e m o s o s l a d n a y d u t s e h t f o c i p o t e h t o t d e t a l e r
. s i s y l a n
a Toanswert hequesitonsi n t heproblemf ormulaiton, t hewrtie r ifnd sou t
t e r a s f o o r p e h T . fl e s ti l e v o n e h t m o r f s f o o r p e m o
s hestatementf romt hecharacte r
d n a , r o h t u a e h t m o r f n o it a r r a n e h t ,s r e t c a r a h c r e h t o m o r f s t n e m e t a t s e h t ,f l e s r e h
r f o s l
a omt heaciton soft hecharacte rwhicharedescirbedbyt heautho .r
e t s t s ri f e h T . s i s e h t s i h t g n it ir w n i s p e t s l a r e v e s k o o t r e ti r w e h
T p, t hewrtie r
’ o h l e o C o l u a P , l e v o n e h t d a e
r sByt heRive rPiedra ISa tDown andWept ,ast he g n i d n a t s r e d n u e h t t e g o t s e m it l a r e v e s l e v o n e h t d a e r r e ti r w e h T . e c r u o s y r a m ir p
y r o t s e h t f
o and t hef ocu soft hestudy .Thesecondstep,t hewrtierf ound outt he
e h t e z y l a n a o t h c a o r p p a e l b a ti u s e h t d n a n o it a l u m r o f m e l b o r
p study .The thrid
d n a s e ir o e h t f o s k o o b e m o s d n u o f r e ti r w e h t , p e t
s ciritcismt os uppo tri nanalyzing
o t g n i y rt s a w r e ti r w e h t , p e t s t x e n e h T . y d u t s e h
t answert heproblemf ormulaiton
p a o s l a d n
a plying t hetheo ires t o answer t heproblem formulaiton .The l as tstep ,
0 2
V I R E T P A H C
S I S Y L A N A
h t n
I i schapter ,the wrtie ranalyzes the nove lin orde rto answe rthe .
n o it a l u m r o f m e l b o r
p The wrtie rput ssome quotaiton sfrom the nove lto give .
s t n e m e t a t s s ’ r e ti r w e h t f o s f o o r
p Thi schapter i sdivided into t hree patrs .In t he t
s ri
f patr ,the wrtie rwli ldiscus sabou ttheauthor’ sdescirpiton about Pliar .The t
u o b a s i tr a p d n o c e
s theauthor’ sdescirp itonabou tPliar’s chlidhoodf irend. Int hi s s
a h r a li P t a h t r a e l c s i l e v o
n confilc twtih he rchlidhood firend .The las tpar ti s t
u o b
a ht e signi ifcance o ftha tconfilct toward he rchlidhood firend’ sdecision in t
s e ir p a e b o t ll a c e h t g n i d n o p s e
r .
.
A TheAuthor’ sDescripitonabou ttheMainCharacters s
’ o h l e o
C By the Rive r Piedra I Sa t Down and Wept ha s two main h
d n a r a li P e r a y e h T . s r e t c a r a h
c e rchlidhood f irend .In thi spatr ,the wrtie rwli l .
m e h t t u o b a n o it p ir c s e d s ’ r o h t u a e h t t u o b a n i a l p x e
.
1 Pliar
a s a d e b ir c s e d s i r a li
P dynamic character .He rcharacte rchanges .In thi s i
h t n i d e t a t s t o n s i e m a n e s o h w d n e ir f d o o h d li h c l a i c e p s a s a h r a li P l e v o
n sstory .
a e m a c e b r a li P , e m it t a h t e c n i S . o g a s r a e y n e v e l e r e h t f e l d n e ir f d o o h d li h c r e H
. n o s r e p k a e
w Shedescirbe sa sapersonwhoi sl acko fcon ifdence. e
c n e d if n o c f o k c a l s i s s e n k a e w s ’ r a li
P . I tcan be seen i n some reailzaiton .s e
c n e d if n o c f o k c a l r e
H make she rhestiatet omakeadecision.I nt henovel ,wecan e
e
e c n e u lf n i g n i v a e l s ’ d n e ir f d o o h d li h c r e
H s Pliar’ slfie .She los tsomeone I
. e r u t u f r e h o t r e h t c e ri d n a c o h
w tshowst ha tPlia rneed shim .Then ,Plia rmake s d o o h d li h c r e h f o e c n e t s i x e e h t e c a l p e r o t r e h t O e h t d e m a n , e r u g if y r a n i g a m i n a
t c e ri d s y a w l a e r u g if y r a n i g a m i s i h T . d n e ir
f s Pliar i n making adecision .She wli l s
y a s r e h t O e h t t a h w o
d because she t hinkst ha t ti i st he bette rdecision t han she .
n i a g a g n o r w e b n a c t a h t n o i s i c e d n w o r e h s e k a m
e c n e r e f n o c e h t o t e m o c o t n o i s i c e d s e k a m r a li P n e h
W and mee the r
e h S . e c n e r e f n o c e h t d n e tt a e l p o e p y n a m e s u a c e b d e z a m a s i e h s , d n e ir f d o o h d li h c
d li h c r e h t a h t w o n k t o n s e o
d hood f irendi sso f amou samongt he people. “ Iwan t e
l p o e p e h t o t p u o g o
t in t heaudienceand ask t hem why t hey weret here ,bu t I .
e v r e n e h t e v a h t ’ n d i
d ” (1996:5 .) Shei swliilng t o ask t hepeople why t hey were e
h s t u b , e r e h
t i s no tbrave enough to do that. She i sno tcon ifden tbecause she o h w e n o e h t s i e h s d n a n o s r e p s u o m a f a e b t s u m d n e ir f d o o h d li h c r e h t a h t s k n i h t
.t i t u o b a w o n k t o n s e o d
r e h s t p e c c a e h S . d ir d a M n i e c n e r e f n o c e h t o t e m o c o t s e d i c e d r a li P , y ll a n i F
o t e m o c o t n o it a ti v n i s ’ d n e ir f d o o h d li h
c the conference atlhough t he Othe rdoe s r
e H . t a h t h ti w e e r g a t o
n cu irostiy lead sher t o maket hi sdecision .She wants t o s
i h w o n
k appearanceandhi schange ssof a.r Shei scu irou sabou twha thewli ldo s
o p t o g y l n o e h s , s r a e y e v l e w t r o F . e c n e r e f n o c e h t n
i tcard sand l etter sfrom him .
d e ti s i v n e e b s a h e h t a h t s e c a l p e h t s w o h s h c i h w
e c n e i d u a e h T . m i h o t e m o c e l p o e p y n a m , r e r u t c e l s i h s e h s i n if e h n e h
W s
h ti w m i h t e e m o t e c a p s o n s a h r a li P . m i h o t r a e n e b o t d n a m i h h c a e r o t g n i y rt e r a
m i h d n u o r a e l p o e p y n a m o
, d e ti a w I . m i h o t p u d e h s u r e c n e i d u a e h t f o s r e b m e m , e r u t c e l e h t r e tf A
. s r a e y y n a m o s r e tf a e b d l u o w e m f o n o i s s e r p m i t s ri f s i h t a h w t u o b a d e ir r o w
d li h c a e k il t l e f
I -insecure, t ense because Iknew noneo fhi snew f irends , g
n i y a p s a w e h t a h t s u o l a e j d n
a more atteniton to the other sthan to me . (1996: )9
e c n e d if n o c t o n s i r a li
P wtih hersefl .I talso show stha tshe i slack o fs -efl e
c n e d if n o
c .She i safraid o fhe rch lidhood firend’ sfris timpression when they .
t e e
m Shealsof eelsj ealou swhen hi schlidhoodf irend i spayingattenitonmoret o o
t n a h t s r e h t o e h
t h e.rInothe rside ,shei scu irou sabou thisf risti mpression atfe r e
h
t ydidno tmeetf ort welveyear .s 9
e g a p n
I Plia rsay s“ Icouldhave”f o rmany itmesi nt hi spar.tI tshowst ha t t
g n il li w s i e h
s o do something bu tshe i suncetrain to do ti .She i sstli lno t d
a o r b o s s i o h w d n e ir f d o o h d li h c r e h h ti w t n e d if n o
c -minded.Thi ssentenceshow s t
a h
t Pliari snots urewtihwhats hedoes .Shecouldhavel ef thimandt akeabust o s
s i e h s t u b , e m o h k c a b e m o
c tli lhere wtih he rchlidhood f irend who i salso hi s .r
e v o l
o t o g o t m i h y n a p m o c c a o t r e h d e k s a e h , d n e ir f d o o h d li h c r e h t e m e h s r e tf A
t A . e r e h t n o it p e c n o C e t a l u c a m m I e h t e t a r b e l e c o t o s l a d n a e r u t c e l a e v a h o t o a b li B
i a s e h s e s u a c e b t i d e t c e j e r r a li P t s ri
f d t ha tsheshould go back t o Zaragoza soon . s i h t t a h t s k n i h t e h S . o a b li B o t m i h h ti w o g o t e d i c e d r e h s e k a m y ti s o ir u c r e h n e h T
. e c n o e m o c y l n o e c n a h c
s i e h S . n o i s i c e d r e h t e r g e r s e m it e m o s r a li P s e k a m e c n e d if n o c f o k c a l r e H
n o i s i c e d r e h t u o b a e r u s t o n l li t
s .“ Iwa sbeginning t o regre tmy decisiont o come y n a t s i s n i o t t o n d e v l o s e r I , n i a g a t c e j b u s e h t d e g n a h c e h n e h w , o S . m i h h ti w
.r e h tr u
s y a w l a e h y e n r u o j ri e h t n i e s u a c e b d n e ir
f changes thet opicoft hei rconversaiton o t e k il t o n s e o d e h t a h t s k n i h t e h S . d o o h d li h c r i e h t t u o b a k l a t o t s tr a t s r a li P n e h w
. n i a g a d o o h d li h c r i e h t t u o b a k l a t
d n i m e r o t s t n a w r a li P t a h t s w o h s d n e ir f d o o h d li h c r e h h ti w n o it a s r e v n o c r e H
n i s s e n i p p a h r e h t u o b a m i
h thei rch lidhood when t hey areplaying t ogethe.r Plia r .
d o o h d li h c r i e h t n i t n e m o m y p p a h e h t d n i m e r d n a k c a b h s a lf o t s t n a
w In othe r
t o n s e o d d n e ir f d o o h d li h c r e h , e d i
s w anttohea ranythingaboutt hei rpastl fie .He .
c i p o t s u o i g il e r t u o b a s s u c s i d o t s t n a w
.r a li P o t e m a c n a m o w a , d n e ir f d o o h d li h c r e h g n it i a w s a w e h s e li h
W He r
. a d ir B s i e m a
n ShetoldPlia raboutt het opict hati sgivenbyhe rchlidhoodf irend .
e r u t c e l s i h n
i Shealso showed hert hePlazaCybele , tii saf ountain porrtaying a a
ir r a c a n i n a m o
w gedrawn by ilons .Sheexplainedhe raboutt hatf ountain .B irda .
d n e ir f d o o h d li h c r e h o t g n il e e f l a i c e p s s ’ r a li P t u o b a w e n k o s l
a B irda said tha t
d n e ir f d o o h d li h c r e h t a h t r a li P d l o t o s l a a d ir B . tr u h s a w t i d n a e v o l n i s a w r a li P
o t g n il e e f e m a s e h t d a h o s l
a Pliar . tIcould beseen f romhi seye sandt heway he .
r e h w a s
. r e h tr u f s k n i h t r a li P , d n e ir f d o o h d li h c r e h h ti w n o it a s r e v n o c l l a m s e h t r e tf A
s r e b m e m e r e h
S tha tshe come sfrom a village .Shet irest o comparehersel fwtih .
y ti c g i b a m o r f e m o c o h w n e m o w
w o
N ,maybe,I ’magilrf romf armwtihnogrea tsto irest ot ell .MaybeI l ack y
rt n u o c e h t n i e fi L . y ti c g i b a m o r f n e m o w f o n o it a c it s i h p o s e h
t may no t
r e h o t n e t s il o t w o h r e h s e h c a e t ll it s ti t u b , y l d lr o w r o t n a g e l e n a m o w a e k a m
it s n i ri e h t t s u rt o t d n a t r a e
Thewrtie rconcludest ha tPlia rbulid she rsefl-con ifdencebecauseshebeilevesi n h
c r e h n i w o t e l b a e b l li w e h s t a h t fl e s r e
h lidhoodf irend’ shear tands hebeilevesi n .r
e h t e g o t d o G e v r e s n a c y e h t t a h t fl e s r e h
s i e h S . k s ir g n i k a t f o d i a r f a o s l a s i r a li P , e c n e d if n o c f o s k c a l e h s e d i s e B
e h t f o d i a r f a s i e h s e s u a c e b n o i s i c e d e k a m o t t l u c if fi
d irsk tha tcomes wtih the
t a h t n o i s i c e
d shemakes .Oneoft heexamplesi swhen shestatrst of ee luncetrain .
g n il e e f r e h h ti
w “Who do Ihave to prove anything to? Iwasn’ tlooking fo r g
n i h t y n
a – notf o rmanand cetrainly notf orl ove”(1996:4 1 .)Fromt hi sstatemen t e
o d e h s t a h t e r u s s e k a m r a li
P s no tlove him .She is afraid o fthe irsk o floving ,
e n o e m o s e v o l o t g n il li w s i n o s r e p a n e h W . e n o e m o
s tha tpersonshouldalsot ake .s
k s ir e h
t
s ’ r a li
P fea rof t aking t he irsk can be seen when Plia rsays ,“So we would u
r a e n y a t s n a c o h w e s o h t o t y l n o e v o
l .s”( 1996:5 . 2) In t hi scase ,Pliari safraid i f e m it d o o h d li h c r i e h t n i e r o f e b d i d e h t a h w e k il n i a g a r e h e v a e l y a m d n e ir f r e h
. d n u o r a s l e v a rt s y a w l a e h r e v o e r o
m Shet hinksi fhel ove she rchlidhoodf irend,i t e
b n i a g a t r a e h r e h k a e r b l li
w causehecannot staynea rhe.r
. k s ir g n i k a t f o d i a r f a s i r a li P n e h w s t n e m o m e m o s s d n if r e ti r w e h
T The
l li w e h s f i d i a r f a s l e e f e h s n e h w n e e s e b n a c s k s ir g n i k a t f o r a e f s ’ r a li P r e h t o
li h c r e h r o f s a h e h s e v o l e h t r e f f u
s dhood f irend. When Pliar t hinks t ha tshe doe s e
e n t o
n danewf ear,i tmeanst hatt he‘ other’i st heonewhocon rtol she rmind.I n .
r a li P e d i s n i s r a e f f o s e c i o v e r a e r e h t ,l e v o n s i h
t Thosevoice sare called a s t‘he ’
r e h t
’ eT h Other ’alway sremind she rabou tthe realtiy tha tshe ha sto face .I t p
e t s t x e n e h t e k a t o t t o n r e h g n i d n i m e r s p e e
k inl fieand r eminding he rnott o do g
n i h t e m o
s stupid o rfooilsh ,and also reminding he rto conrto lhe rheatr .The d n a , e fi l r e i s a e n a t u o b a y ti l a e r e h t , e fi l g n i s i m o r p y p p a h s t n a w s y a w l a ’ r e h t O ‘
p p a h a s d li u
b y mar irage wtih ch lidren and husband she want .s The quotaiton ’
r e h t O ’ e h t f o e l p m a x e e h t s i w o l e
b .
g n it i a w s i r o f g n i k o o l ll it s m ’ I d n a b s u h e h T . e m r o f g n it i a w e r a s e i d u t s y M
r o f s ti a w e fi l r e i s a e n A . d n if o t tl u c if fi d s a e b t ’ n o w o h w d n a b s u h a , e m r o f
, e
m wtih chlidren and grandchlidren ,wtih a clea rbudge tand a yealry d e e n t ’ n o d I . n w o y m w o n k I t u b , e r a s r a e f s i h t a h w w o n k t ’ n o d I . n o it a c a v
( . h g u o n e e r a n w o y m , s r a e f w e
n 1996:3 1 )
e s a n i s k r o w , l o o h c s s e h s i n if , e fi l r e i s a e n a s t n a w t s u j r a li
P curej ob with aclea r
l l a m s a , a z o g a r a Z n i y a t s o t s e s o o h c e h S . n e r d li h c s a h d n a d e ir r a m s t e g , t e g d u b
r e h , d n a b s u h r e h h ti w e m it r e h d n e p s o t s t n a w o s l a r a li P . d n a l l u f e c a e p a d n a y ti c
. n e r d li h c d n a r g r e h d n a , n e r d li h
c Meanwhlie ,he rch lidhoodf irendi sa rtaveler . He r
o f e fi l r e tt e b a e k a m o t g n i y rt s i o h w r e r u t n e v d a n a s
i hi sownand heneverf eel s n
o d e s a B . e fi l f o e s o p r u p e h t r o f g n i h c r a e s n i d e ri
t the quotaiton above ,wecan t
a h t e e
s Plia rknow she rown fear sand shei safraid i fshe wli lsuffe rbecauseo f e
e f r e
h ilngt ohe rchlidhood f irend .Pliari safraid fo theconsequence sand irsk so f .
e n o e m o s g n i v o l
d i a r f a l li t s s i e h S . d e s u f n o c g n it t e g s i r a li P n e h w t n e m o m a s d n if r e ti r w e h T d n
a shei snots urewtihherf eeilng .Shet irest odenyt hatl ovef eeilng.
e o d t
I sn’ teven matte rwhethe rwe can keep t he l oved one a tou rside .To a
r c a h c u s w o ll a t o n n a c I , o n , o N . l o rt n o c e s o l o t s i e v o
l ck to form .No
.l l a m s w o h r e tt a
g n u o y y n a m o s e k il , tf e l e h n e h T . r e h t e g o t n e r d li h c n e e b d a h e W
e h t t u o b a n r a e l o t g n i o g s a w e h d i a s e H . s n w o t l l a m s e v a e l o h w e l p o e p
. a ir o S f o s d l e if e h t d n o y e b y a l s m a e r d s i h t a h t , d lr o
w (1996:3)
h t a h t m a e r d s i h h c a e r o t s t n a w e
H ecanno t ifnd i n So iraso t ha thel eave sSo ira .
r a li P o s l a d n a
s e r a c l li t s e h t a h t s w o h s tI . r a li P o t s r e tt e l s d n e s ll it s e h , y e n r u o j s i h n i g n o l A
. r e h o
t In the fris tyear ,someitme she sen tlette rto Plia rto tel lhe rabou thi s .
n o it i d n o
c Then ,hestartst o sendherl etter smoref requen.t Thestamp spu tont he e
h t a h t s w o h s e r a s r e tt e
l ha svistied many places .Pliar’ schlidhood firend ha s y
e n r u o j s i h g n o l a s g n i h t y n a m t n r a e
l .Heha sbeenapersont ha tgivesl ecturei na .
e c n e r e f n o c
n o s r e p a o s l a s i e
H tha tdoe sno t ilke to see backward sto hi schlidhood e H . s t n e m o m d o o h d li h c r i e h t t u o b a m i h d l o t r a li P n e h w n e e s e b n a c t I .s t n e m o m
. y r o t s e h t d n o p s e r o t e k il t o n s e o d
o t d e ir t d a h I , g n i n n i g e b e h t n
I reminisce abou t ou r chlidhoo d w
o h s d ’ e h t u b , s e r u t n e v d
a n only a poltie interest .In fact ,he hadn’ teven d a h I s g n i h t t u o b a s n o it s e u q e m g n i k s a t p e k e h ; e m o t g n i n e t s il n e e b y ll a e r
m i h d l o t y d a e rl
a .( 1996:17)
o f m o c l e e f t o n s e o d d n e ir f d o o h d li h c s ’ r a li P t a h t s w o h s t
I trable in discussing
ri e h t , e m it t s a p t u o b
a chlidhoodexpe irence .s
h ti w g n il e e f e m a s e h t s a h e h t a h t s w o h s t a h t t r a p a s i e r e h t , y r o t s e h t n I . r a li
P He ha skep thi sspecia lfeeilng so far .I ti salso the reason why he asked .
e h t o f o s n i s e h t e g d u j y e h t t a h t d n A
“ rs ,even t hough t hey may commtit he e g a ir r a m t u o b a w o n k o t s i e r e h t ll a w o n k y e h t t a h T . s e v l e s m e h t s n i s e m a s
) 9 1 1 : 6 9 9 1 ( ” .. .. .. y r r a m r e v e n y e h t t u b , e v o l d n a
d n a e r d a p A . m e h t d e e n o h w s r e h t o r o f d n a d o G r o f e fi l ri e h t y ll a t o t e t a c i d e d y e h T
n i m e s
a a iranalway shavemissiont oaccompilsh .“ Iknewwhatt hatl tiltemanwa s e r o m a d a h e h e s u a c e b , m i h e v a e l o t e m d e c n i v n o c o t e m o c d a h e H . e r e h g n i o d
) 5 2 1 : 6 9 9 1 ( ” . h s il p m o c c a o t n o i s s i m t n a tr o p m i
y r o t s s i h t n
I , t heautho rwantst o show t her eade raboutt hei nterna lconfilc t d lr o w s i h s e v a e l t a h t t s e ir p a s a l l a c s i h d n o p s e r o t s t n a w e h n e h w n a ir a n i m e s a f o
. d o G r o f e fi l s i h e t a c i d e d o t d n a s r e h t o e v r e s o
t I tcan be seen from howP liar’ s d
n if d n e ir f d o o h d li h
c s the answe ro fhi scall .He i s rtying hard to ifnd the bes t .
ll a c e h t g n i d n o p s e r n i n o i s i c e d
.
B TheConfilct soft heMainCharacters
. y r o t s a f o t o l p a o t e t a l e r o s l a l li w t c il f n o c t u o b a g n i s s u c s i
D According t o
. y r o t s a n i s n o it c a e h t f o t n e m p o l e v e d e h t f o n a l p a s i t o l p a , s b o c a J d n a s tr e b o R
h s y a w l a r o h t u a n
A as acetrainplant odrawhowt hes torywli lwork. .
1 Pliar’ sConfilct
, y r o t s s i h t n
I Plia rgetsi nternalconfilc twtih hersel .fInt hi sstory ,therei sa d
e m a n r e t c a r a h
c theOther . tIi sno tar ea lcharacter . tIi sPliar’si maginary ifgure g
if e h t e c a l p e r o
t ure o fhe rchlidhood firend .Actually t hi s ifgurei st he sound o f .
d n i m s ’ r a li
P Inmakingadecision ,Plia ralway sha sconfilc twtiht heOther .When n
a w r a li
t o t g n i o
g urn my world upside down .My brain warned me ,bu tmy hear tdidn’ t
e c i v d a s ti e k a t o t t n a
w ”( p.41) .
t o n s e o d t r a e h r e h t a h t s w o n k r a li P , t n e m e t a t s t a h t m o r
F wan tto ilsten to
r e h t O e h t l e v o n s i h t n I . s y a s r e h t O e h t t a h
w represent she rbrain .Thebrain t ell s e
h t u b , e n o e m o s g n i v o l f o l u f e r a c g n i e b n i y ti l a e r e h t t u o b a r e
h rheatr i sweak .
o t g n il e e f r e
H himj us t lfow sanddoe sno twantt ot aket headvicef romt heOther . r
e h t O e h t , n e h t t u
B its llr emind she ronceagain .TheOtherwantst o ifgh twtihhe r t
r a e
h sot hats hewillr eailzewhatt hebes tpathi sf o rhe.r
f o d n u o s e h t s a r e h t O e h t y b d e ll o rt n o c s a w e h s t a h t s e z il a e r r a li P , y a d e n O
. t h g u o h t r e h d n a d n i m r e
h Sher eailzest hatt heOthe rhasi n lfuencedheri nmaking t
e t a ti s e h r a li P e d a m s a h t I . n o i s i c e d
a o do something .TheOthe rwant sPlia r ilve n r a e , e l b a t e h t d n i h e b k r o w , y d u t s r e h h s i n if r a li P s t n a w t I . n e m o w n o m m o c e k il
. d l o g n it t e g s i e h s n e h w r e g n u h g n il e e f t u o h ti w e v il n a c e h s o s y e n o m h c u m
“The Other i s t heone who t augh tme wha t Ishould be ilke, bu tno t I
t a h
w am .TheOthe rbeileves t ha t tii sou robilgaiton t o spend ou rentrie r
u o t e g o t w o h t u o b a g n i k n i h t e fi
l grandson a smuch moneya spossible so t u o b a h c u m o s k n i h t e w o S . d l o e r a e w n e h w r e g n u h f o e i d t o n l li w e w t a h t
s n a l p r u o d n a y e n o
m fo racqui irng i ttha twe discove rwe are ailve only ti
n e h t d n A . e n o d y ll a c it c a r p e r a h tr a e n o s y a d r u o n e h
w ’st ool ate.”(p .50) r
a li P , d n a h r e h t o n
I want sto rty the new adventure wtih he rlover .She ,
s e l c a ri m l e e f o t s t n a w e h S . tr a e h r e h o t n e t s il o t s t n a
w doingsomething t ha twli l g
n ir
b joy and enthusiasm expe irence. Shedoe sno twan tan ordinary l fie ilket he .
s t n a w r e h t O
“’Imj us t ilkeeveryoneelsewho l sitenst o t hei rhearts :a person who h w , s e l c a r i m o t n e p o s i o h W . e fi l f o y r e t s y m e h t y b d e t n a h c n e s
