DELSINA PRAMATA SARI, 2014
PENGARUH STRATEGI REACT TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN REPRESENTASI, PENALARAN, DAN DISPOSISI MATEMATIS SISWA SMP
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Agus, N. A. (2008). Mudah belajar matematika 2: untuk kelas VIII Sekolah Menengah Pertama/Madrasah Tsanawiyah. Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Arikunto, S (2010). Prosedur penelitian: suatu pendekatan praktik. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.
Arikunto, S (2013). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan (Ed.2). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Artami, W, & Kurniasih, N. (2015). Pengaruh strategi REACT setting NHT terhadap disposisi matematis siswa dan kemampuan pemecahan masalah. Ekuivale: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 18 (1), hlm. 80-84.
Ashlock, R. B. (2002). Error patterns in computation: Using error patterns to improve instruction. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
Atallah, F., Bryant, S.L., Dada, R. (2009). A research framework for studying conceptions and dispositions of mathematics: a dialogue to help students learn. Research in Higher Education Journal, hlm. 1-8.
Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa. (2015). KBBI online. [Online]. Diakses dari: http://kbbi.web.id/mampu.
Baharuddin & Wahyuni, E. N. (2008). Teori belajar dan pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Ar-ruzz Media.
Balitbang. (2011). Survei internasional PISA: PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment). [Online]. Diakses dari:
http://litbang.kemdikbud.go.id/index.php/survei-internasional-pisa.
Baroody, A, J. (1993). Problem solving, reasoning, and communicating, (K-8): helping children think mathematically. New York: Merrill as imprint of Macmillan Publishing Company.
Beyer, J. (2011). Development and evaluation of an instrument to assess prospective
teachers’ dispositions with respect to mathematics. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2 (16), hlm. 20-32.
Beyers, J. E. R. (2012). An examination of the relationship between prospective
elementary education majors. Sage Open, pp. 1-15. DOI: 10.1177/2158244012462589.
Bilber, C., Tuna, A., & Korkmaz, S. (2013). The mistakes and the misconceptions of the eighth grade students on the subject of angles. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1(2), hlm. 50-59.
Borg, W. & Gall, M. (1989).Educational research (An introduction fifth edition). New York: Longman.
BSNP. (2013). Laporan hasil ujian nasional tahun pelajaran 2012/2013. Software Pamer13.
Christensen, L. B. (1997). Experimental methodology (7th Ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Coe, R. (2002). It’s the effect size, stupid1: what effect size is and why it is important. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association annual conference, Exeter, 12-14 September 2002.
CORD. (1999). Teaching mathematics contextually: the cornerstone of tech prep.
Texas: CORD Communications, Inc.
CORD. (2012). The REACT strategy. [Online]. Diakses dari: http://www.cord.org/the-react-learning-strategy/.
Coughlan, S. (2015). Asia tops biggest global school rankings. [Online]. Diakses dari: http://www.bbc.com/news/business-32608772.
Crawford. (2001). Teaching contextually. Texas: CCI Publishing, Inc.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th Ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Dahlan, J. A. (2004). Meningkatkan kemampuan pemahaman dan penalaran matematika siswa sekolah lanjutan tingkat pertama melalui pendekatan Open-ended. Disertasi SPs UPI. Bandung: Tidak Diterbitkan.
Darhim. (2015). Media dan alat peraga dalam pendidikan matematika. Bandung: UPI Press.
De Lange, J. (2006). Mathematical literacy for living from OECD-PISA perspective. Utrecht: Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
Depdiknas. (2004). Petunjuk teknis peraturan Dirjen Dikdasmen Depdiknas Nomor 506/C/PP/2004. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Dris, J. & Tasari. (2011). Matematika 2: untuk SMP dan MTs kelas VIII. Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Fadhila, Trisoni, R., & Afriyani, D. (2014). Pengaruh pembelajaran kontekstual dengan strategi react terhadap kemampuan koneksi matematika. Edusainstika, 1(1), hlm. 89-91.
Fauziah, A. (2009). Peningkatan kemampuan pemahaman dan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa SMP melalui strategi REACT (Relating, Experiencing, Applying, cooperating, Transferring). Tesis SPs UPI. Bandung: Tidak Diterbitkan.
Fortuna, I. K. A. D., Dantes, N. & Sariyasa. (2014). Pengaruh strategi REACT terhadap hasil belajar matematika ditinjau dari aktivitas belajar siswa kelas V
SD. E-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
Program Studi Pendidikan Dasar, 4(1), hlm. 1-12.
Fraenkel, J. R. & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate reasearch and education (7th Ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Hake, R. R. (2002). Relationship of individual student normalized learning gain in mechanics with gender, high school physics, and pretest scores on mathematics and spatials visualization. Physics Education Research Conference: Boise, Idaho.
Hanna, R. (2012). Budaya menyontek di kalangan pelajar. [Online]. Diakses dari: sulut.kemenag.go.id/file/file/BimasIslam/wito1367246119.pdf.
Hergenhahn, B. R.&Olson, M. H. (2010). Theories of learning. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Grup.
Herringer, N. (2013). Making sense of mathematics through reasoning. [Online]. Diakses dari: http://www.3plearning.com/making-sense-mathematics-reasoning-2/.
Jaenudin. (2008). Pengaruh pendekatan kontekstual terhadap kemampuan representasi matematik beragam siswa sekolah menengah pertama. Skripsi SPs UPI. Bandung: Tidak Diterbitkan.
Jansen, A. (2012). Developing productive dispositions during small-group work in two sixth-grade mathematics classrooms: teachers' facilitation efforts and students' self-reported benefits. Middle Grades Research Journal, 7(1), hlm. 37-56.
Karmila, I. (2015). Penerapan strategi pembelajaran everyone is a teacher here disertai tugas superitem terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan beliefs matematis siswa SMP. Tesis SPs UPI. Bandung: Tidak Diterbitkan.
Kemdikbud. (2014). Buku guru: matematika. Jakarta : Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Lesh, R., Posh, T., & Behr, M. (1987). Representations and translations among representations in mathematics learning and problem solving. In Janvier, C. (Ed.), Problems of Representation in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics (hal. 33-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Elbaum Associates.
Lie, A. (2005). Cooperative learning. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Lohman, D.F & Lakin, J.M. (2009). Reasoning and intelligence. [Online]. Diakses dari:
http://faculty.education.uiowa.edu/dlohman/pdf/Reasoning%20and%20Intell_ Lohman%20Lakin%20102709.pdf.
Luitel, B. C. (2001). Multiple representations of mathematical learning. [Online]. Diakses dari: http://www.matedu.cinvestav.mx/adalira.pdf.
Marsigit, Erliani, E., Dhoruri, A., Sugiman. (2011). Matematika 2: untuk SMP/MTs kelas VIII. Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Marthen, T. (2010). Pengembangan kemampuan matematis siswa melalui pembelajaran kontekstual dengan pendekatan REACT. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 11 (2), hlm. 11-20.
Maxwell, K. (2001). Positive learning dispositions in mathematics. [Online]. Diakses dari: https://cdn.auckland.ac.nz/.../ACE_Paper_3_Issue...
Minium, E. W., King, B. M., & Bear, G. (1993). Statistical reasoning in psychology and education (3rd Ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Mudzakir, H. S. (2006). Strategi pembelajaran think talk and write untuk meningkatkan kemampuan representasi matematik beragam siswa SMP. Tesis SPs UPI. Bandung: Tidak Diterbitkan.
Mullis, I. V. S. et al. (2001). TIMSS trends in mathematics and science study: assessment framework and specifications 2003. Boston: ISC.
NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
Nugroho, H., Meisaroh, L. (2009). Matematika 2: SMP dan MTs kelas VIII. Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Nuharini, D. & Wahyuni, T. (2008). Matematika konsep dan aplikasinya: untuk SMP/MTs kelas VIII. Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Nyikahadzoyi, M. R., Mapuwei, T., & Chinyoka, M. (2013). Some cognitive obstacles faced by ‘a’ level mathematics students in understanding inequalities: a case study of Bindura Urban High Schools. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 2(2), hlm. 206-221.
OECD. (2013). Draft PISA 2015 mathematics framework. Paris, France: OECD.
OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 results in focus: what 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Paris, France: OECD.
OECD.(2003). The PISA 2003 assessment framework-mathematics, reading, science and problem solving knowledge and skills. Paris, France: OECD.
Oxford. (2015). Oxford advanced learner's dictionary. [Online]. Diakses dari: http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/learner/reasoning.
Ozgun-Koca, S. A. (1998). Students’ use of representations in mathematics education. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for thePsychology of Mathematics Education (Raleigh, NC, October 31-November 2, 1998).
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 32 Tahun 2013 (revisi PP Nomor 19 Tahun 2005) tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan.
Polking J. (1998). Response to NCTM’s round 4 questions. [Online] Diakses dari: http://www.ams.org/government/argrpt4.html.
Popham, W. J. (1995). Classroom assessments: what teachers need to know. Toronto: Allyn Bacon.
Pranoto, I. (2011). UN matematika menyiapkan anak Indonesia menjadi kuli nirnalar; Republik telah menyerobot kesempatan anak bangsa bernalar. [Online]. Diakses dari http://www.slideshare.net/y0r/un-matematika-menyiapkan-anak-menjadi-kuli-nirnalar.
Priatna, N. (2010). Penalaran matematika. [Online]. Diakses dari: http://file.upi.edu/Direktori/FPMIPA/JUR._PEND._MATEMATIKA/196303 311988031-NANANG_PRIATNA/Penalaran_Matematika.pdf.
Priatna, N., Sukamto, T., & Sadam, R. (2015). Matematika: untuk kelas VIII SMP/MTs. Bandung: Grafindo Media Pratama.
Roselizawati. & Shahrill, M. (2014). Understanding students' mathematical errors and misconceptions: the case of year 11 repeating students. ISPACS: Mathematics Education Trends and Research, (2014), hlm. 1-10.
Salkind, G. M. (2007). Mathematical representations. EDCI Preparation and Proffessional Developent of Mathematics Teachers. George Mason University.
Santi, D. P. D. (2014). Penerapan pendekatan kontekstual dengan strategi REACT untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemahaman konsep dan representasi matematis siswa Sekolah Dasar: Studi Kuasi eksperimen pada Siswa Kelas V Sekolah dasar. [Online]. Diakses dari: http://e-journal.unswagati-crb.ac.id/.
Santrock, J. W. (2010). Psikologi pendidikan (Edisi Kedua). Jakarta: Kencana.
Sarwadi, et al. (2014). Understanding students' mathematical errors and misconceptions: the case of year 11 repeating students. ISPACS, hal. 1-10.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15 (2), hal. 4-14.
Suhandri. (2011). Meningkatkan pemahaman dan penalaran matematis siswa SMP pada pembelajaran geometri dengan menggunakan strategi REACT. Tesis SPS UPI: Tidak Diterbitkan.
Suherman, E. (2003). Evaluasi pembelajaran matematika. Dalam Turmudi. (Ed). Bandung: UPI.
Suherman, E. dan Kusumah, Y. S. (1990). Evaluasi pendidikan matematika. Bandung: Wijayakusumah.
Sumarmo, U. (2010). Berfikir dan disposisi matematika: apa, mengapa, dan bagaimana dikembangkan pada peserta didik. [Online]. Diakses dari http://Math.sps.upi.edu/wp content/uploads/2010/2/ BERFIKIR-DAN-DISPOSISI-MATEMATIK-SPS-2010.pdf indikator mtk.
Sumarmo, U. (2015b). Kumpulan makalah: berpikir dan disposisi matematik serta pembelajarannya. Bandung: UPI Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika.
Suparlan, A. (2005). Pembelajaran berbasis masalah untuk mengembangkan kemampuan pemahaman dan representasi matematik siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama (studi eksperimen pada siswa salah satu SMP di Cirebon). Tesis SPS UPI: Tidak Diterbitkan.
Syaban, M. (2009). Menumbuhkan daya dan disposisi siswa SMA melalui pembelajaran investigasi. Educationist, 3 (2), hlm. 129-136.
TIMSS. (2011). TIMSS 2011 International results in mathematics. [Online]. Diakses dari:
http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2011/international-results-mathematics.html.
Trimoyo, M. B., et. al. (2009). Materi diklat training of trainer calon tenaga pengajar/dosen lingkungan badiklat perhubungan: pengembangan bahan ajar. Magelang: Badan Diklat Departemen Perhubungan.
Turmudi. (2010). Metodologi pembelajaran matematika. [Online]. Diakses dari: http://file.upi.edu/Direktori/FPMIPA/JUR._PEND._MATEMATIKA/196101
121987031-TURMUDI/F25-Metodologi_dan_Model_PembelajaranMatematika.pdf.
Ultay, N. & Calik, M. (2016). A Comparison of different teaching designs of ‘acids
and bases’ subject. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(1), hal. 57-86.
Van De Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay‐Williams, J. M. (2009). Elementary And middle school mathematics teaching developmentally (7th Ed.).New York: Pearson Education.
Von Glasersfeld, E. (Ed). (1991). Radical contructivism in mathematics education. Kluwer Akademic Publisher: Dordrecht.
Wilson, P. (2011). Disposition towards engagement in mathematics. Smith, C. (Ed.) Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 31(2) June 2011, hlm. 67-72.
Wiyaka. (2014, 6 Mei). Mencontek dan pendidikan karakter. Suara Merdeka.
[Online]. Diakses dari:
Yuniawatika. (2011). Penerapan pembelajaran matematika dengan strategi REACT untuk meningkatkan kemampuan koneksi dan representasi matematik siswa Sekolah Dasar (studi kuasi eksperimen di kelas V Sekolah Dasar kota Cimahi). Jurnal Edisi Khusus No. 1, hlm. 105-119.
