C
I
M
A
N
Y
D
S
’
T
R
E
B
M
U
H
T
R
E
B
M
U
H
S
O
F
P
E
R
S
O
N
A
L
I
T
Y
G
N
I
V
A
H
N
I
A
L
O
V
E
A
F
F
A
I
R
W
I
T
H
H
I
S
S
T
E
P
D
A
U
G
H
T
E
R
S
’
V
O
K
O
B
A
N
R
I
M
I
D
A
L
V
N
I
N
E
E
S
S
A
L
O
L
I
T
A
A SARJANAPENDIDIKANTHESIS
s t n e m e r i u q e R e h t f o t n e m ll if l u F l a it r a P s a d e t n e s e r P
e h t n i a t b O o
t SarjanaPendidikanDegree n o it a c u d E e g a u g n a L h s il g n E n i
y B
ir t u P a t s e ir A a ti m a r a P a i d n i N t e b a s il E
9 2 0 4 1 2 1 9 0 : r e b m u N t n e d u t S
M A R G O R P Y D U T S N O I T A C U D E E G A U G N A L H S I L G N E
N O I T A C U D E S T R A D N A E G A U G N A L F O T N E M E T R A P E D
N O I T A C U D E D N A G N I N I A R T S R E H C A E T F O Y T L U C A F
E V I N U A M R A H D A T A N A
S RSITY
A T R A K A Y G O Y
i
C
I
M
A
N
Y
D
S
’
T
R
E
B
M
U
H
T
R
E
B
M
U
H
S
O
F
P
E
R
S
O
N
A
L
I
T
Y
G
N
I
V
A
H
N
I
A
L
O
V
E
A
F
F
A
I
R
W
I
T
H
H
I
S
S
T
E
P
D
A
U
G
H
T
E
R
S
’
V
O
K
O
B
A
N
R
I
M
I
D
A
L
V
N
I
N
E
E
S
S
A
L
O
L
I
T
A
A SARJANAPENDIDIKANTHESIS
s t n e m e r i u q e R e h t f o t n e m ll if l u F l a it r a P s a d e t n e s e r P
e h t n i a t b O o
t SarjanaPendidikanDegree n o it a c u d E e g a u g n a L h s il g n E n i
y B
ir t u P a t s e ir A a ti m a r a P a i d n i N t e b a s il E
9 2 0 4 1 2 1 9 0 : r e b m u N t n e d u t S
M A R G O R P Y D U T S N O I T A C U D E E G A U G N A L H S I L G N E
N O I T A C U D E S T R A D N A E G A U G N A L F O T N E M E T R A P E D
N O I T A C U D E D N A G N I N I A R T S R E H C A E T F O Y T L U C A F
E V I N U A M R A H D A T A N A
S RSITY
A T R A K A Y G O Y
v i N
E M E T A T
S T OFWORK’SORIGINALITY
k r o w e h t n i a t n o c t o n s e o d , n e tt ir w e v a h I h c i h w , s i s e h t s i h t t a h t e r a l c e d y lt s e n o h I
e h t d n a s n o it a t o u q e h t n i d e ti c e s o h t t p e c x e , e l p o e p r e h t o f o k r o w e h t f o s tr a p r o
. d l u o h s r e p a p c if it n e i c s a s a , s e c n e r e f e r
, a tr a k a y g o
Y 8J uly2013 ,r e ti r w e h T
ir t u P a t s e ir A a ti m a r a P a i d n i N t e b a s il E
v
N A U J U T E S R E P N A A T A Y N R E P R A B M E L
S I M E D A K A N A G N I T N E P E K K U T N U H A I M L I A Y R A K I S A K I L B U P
: a m r a h D a t a n a S s a ti s r e v i n U a w s i s a h a m a y a s ,i n i h a w a b i d n a g n a t a d n a tr e b g n a Y
a m a
N :Eilsabe tNindiaParamtiaA irestaPut ir a
w s i s a h a M r o m o
N :091214029
n a a k a t s u p r e P a d a p e k n a k ir e b m e m a y a s , n a u h a t e g n e p u m li n a g n a b m e g n e p i m e D
a m r a h D a t a n a S s a ti s r e v i n
U karya limiahs ayayangbejrudu l :
C
I
M
A
N
Y
D
S
’
T
R
E
B
M
U
H
T
R
E
B
M
U
H
S
O
F
P
E
R
S
O
N
A
L
I
T
Y
G
N
I
V
A
H
N
I
A
L
O
V
E
A
F
F
A
I
R
W
I
T
H
H
I
S
S
T
E
P
D
A
U
G
H
T
E
R
S
’
V
O
K
O
B
A
N
R
I
M
I
D
A
L
V
N
I
N
E
E
S
S
A
L
O
L
I
T
A
n a k ir e b m e m a y a s n a i k i m e d n a g n e D . ) a d a a li b ( n a k u lr e p i d g n a y t a k g n a r e p a tr e s e B
, a t a d n a p m i y n e m k u t n u k a h a m r a h D a t a n a S s a ti s r e v i n U n a a k a t s u p r e P a d a p e k
n e b m a l a d a y n a l o l e g n e m , n i a l a i d e m k u t n e b m a l a d n a k h il a g n e
m tuk pangkalan
u a t a t e n r e t n i e k n a k i s a k il b u p m e m n a d , s a t a b r e t a r a c e s n a k i s u b ir t s i d n e m , a t a d
a y a s i r a d n ij i a t n i m e m u lr e p a p n a t s i m e d a k a n a g n it n e p e k k u t n u n i a l a i d e m
a y a s a m a n n a k m u t n a c n e m p a t e t a m a l e s a y a s a d a p e k y tl a y o r n a k ir e b m e m n u p u a m
.s il u n e p i a g a b e s
Demikianpernyataani nis ayabua tdengans ebenarnya.
a tr a k a y g o Y i d t a u b i D
: l a g g n a t a d a
P 5Jul i2013
n a k a t a y n e m g n a Y
i v
:
ot
s
is
e
ht
s
ih
t
et
a
ci
d
e
d
I
s
y
M
e
fl
p
y
M
a
er
n
st
re
ts
is
y
M
f
es
ol
c
y
M
r
ei
n
d
s
x i
T N E M E G D E L W O N K C
A S
k n a h t o t e k il d l u o w I , ll a f o t s ri
F Jesu sChrist a sHe ha sgiven me e m d e n e h t g n e rt s e v a h e c n a d i u g d n a s e l c a ri m s i H . s i s e h t s i h t h s i n if o t h t g n e rt s
.s i s e h t s i h t g n i h s i n if f o s s e c o r p e h t g n ir u
d
r o s n o p s y m o t e d u ti t a r g y m s s e r p x e o t e k il d l u o w I , y l d n o c e
S ,Henny
. m u H . M , . d P . S , it a w a r e
H fo rhe rpaitence ,guidance ,advice ,andencouragemen t e r e c n i s y m s s e r p x e o t o s l a e k il d l u o w I . s i s e h t y m f o n o it e l p m o c e h t g n ir u d
o t e d u ti t a r
g Romo Lucianu sSuharjanto ,S.J. ,S.S. ,BST ,M.A. fo rthe grea t n o it a i c e r p p a y M . c i p o t s i s e h t y m n o n o it a n a l p x e e h t d n a , n o i s s u c s i d e h t , e c i v d a
o t s e o
g al lPB Ilecturers fo rguiding and sha irng thei rknowledge du irng my .
y ti s r e v i n U a m r a h D a t a n a S n i y d u t s
t a r g t s e p e e d y m , y l d ri h
T tiudegoest omyparents ,FX .WarjonoandCh . u
y a h a R i t n a w r u
P fort he kindnes ,s t he mateiral ,and t hespritiua lsuppo tr i n al l ,
r e t s i s y m k n a h t o s l a d l u o w I . e fi l y m f o s t c e p s
a MariaEndahPusp tiaDewi,f o r
f o o r p y m g n i e
b -readeri nt hist hesi .sMys pecia lthankst oImanue lDyanWasista i
d
A fort heencouragementdu irngt heproces so f ifnishingt hist hesi .s
o t e m d e t a v it o m e v a h o h w s d n e ir f g n i v a h r o f l u f k n a h t r e v e r o f e b l li w I
. s i s e h t s i h t h s i n
if It hank Romo Antoniu sWagetfo rbeing t heproof-reade rand s
i s e h
t -consutlant . I also thank Patrik and Pradtia fo r being psychology e
s u I t a h t s e ir o e h t l a c i g o l o h c y s p e h t r o f s t n a tl u s n o
c d . Iwould ilket oextendavery
o t s k n a h t t l e ft r a e
x a
ll e b r
A , Shela Novtia Sari , Veronica Suilstyani , and Chrisitna Mariana i
n a y g o y
A fo rthei rsuppo tr ,moitvaiton ,and entetrainment . Iam also deilghted f
o t r a p a e b o t l u f e t a r g d n
a INCOGNITO play performance which give sme n o n o it a ri p s n i e m s e v i g d n a e c n a m r o f r e p y a l p e h t n i a ti l o L g n i e b r o f e c n a h c
.s i s e h t s i h t f o c i p o t e h t g n i d n if
o t s k n a h t y n a m t s a e l t o n t u b t s a
L al lmy friend sin PB I2009 ,my s
d n e i r f e s u o h g n i d r a o
b (Tere, Feny ,Nesha ,Roza,Vannie ,Ttia) ,andallf abulou s s
s e r D h t e b a z il E f o s r e m o t s u
c .My grattiude also goe sto al lpeople whom I e h t y a M . e fi l y m n i n o it u b ir t n o c d n a e c n e s e r p r i e h t r o f e n o y b e n o n o it n e m t o n n a c
.s u s s e l b d o G . s u o t e m o c t s e b
i x O E L B A
T FCONTENTS
Page
E G A P E L T I
T ......................................................................................... i E
G A P L A V O R P P
A ............................................................................... ii Y
T I L A N I G I R O S ’ K R O W F O T N E M E T A T
S ................................. .... vi I
S A K I L B U P N A U J U T E S R E P N A A T A Y N R E
P ................................. .... v . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. N O I T A C I D E D F O E G A
P iv
T C A R T S B
A ........................................................................................... v ii K
A R T S B
A ............................................................................................... v iii S
T N E M G D E L W O N K C
A ................................................................. .... xi S
T N E T N O C F O E L B A
T ....................................................................... ix S
E C I D N E P P A F O T S I
L ........................................................................ x iii
O R T N I .I R E T P A H
C DUCTION .......................................................... 1 .
A Backgroundoft heStudy... 1 .
B ProblemFormulaiton ... 4 .
C Objecitveoft heStudy ... 4 .
D Benefti soft heStudy... 4 .
E Deifniitono fTerms ... 6
E R U T A R E T I L D E T A L E R F O W E I V E R . I I R E T P A H
C ................... 8
.
A Reviewo fRelatedStudies ... 8 .
B Reviewo fRelatedTheo ires ... 9 .
ii x .
2 PsychoanalyitcTheory ... 1 0 .
a TheSrtuctureo fPersonaltiy ... 1 1 .
b TheDefenseMechanism so fTheEgo... 1 6 .
C Theoreitca lFramework ... 1 9
. I I I R E T P A H
C METHODOLOGY ...................................................... 2 1 .
A Objec toft heStudy ... 2 1 .
B Approacho fTheStudy ... 2 2 .
C Methodo fTheStudy ... 2 3
. V I R E T P A H
C ANALYSIS ................................................................. .. 2 6 .
A Displacement ... 2 8 .
B ReacitonFormaiton... 3 5
. V R E T P A H
C CONCLUSIONS ANDSUGGESTIONS ...................... 4 2 .
A Conclusions ... .. 4 2 .
B Suggesitons ... .... 4 4 .
1 Suggesitons fo rEngilshFutureReseachers... 4 4 .
2 Suggesitons fo rTeachers... 4 5
S E C N E R E F E
R ...................................................................................... 4 7 S
E C I D N E P P
ii i x
S E C I D N E P P A F O T S I L
e g a P :
A x i d n e p p A
f o y r a m m u
S Loltia ... 5 0
: B x i d n e p p A
v o k o b a N r i m i d a l V f o y h p a r g o i
B ... 5 4
: C x i d n e p p A
n o it c e lf e
R -DevelopingaPsychologicallyHeatlhyTeacher ... 5 7
: D x i d n e p p A
u r u G k it E e d o
1 I R E T P A H C
N O I T C U D O R T N I
e r a y e h T . s tr a p e v if f o s t s i s n o c r e t p a h c s i h
T thebackgroundoft hes tudy ,
e h
t problemf ormulaiton ,theobjecitve soft hestudy ,thebenefti soft hestudy ,and
e h
t deifniiton o fterms .The background o fthe study concern son the reason o f
c i p o t e h t y h w s n o s a e r e h t s t n e s e r p o s l a t I . c i p o t e h t g n i s o o h
c i swo trh studying.
T eh problem formulaiton deal swtih the problem tha twli lbe analyzed in the
f r e t p a h
c our .Theobjecitveoft hes tudyb irngs thepurpose soft hiss tudy .Thenex t
. y d u t s e h t m o r f s n i a g r e ti r w e h t t a h w t u o b a s i tI . y d u t s e h t f o s ti f e n e b e h t s i tr a p
s i h t f o t r a p t s a l e h
T chapte ris t he de ifniiton oft erm swhich contains i mpo tran t
g i b m a d i o v a o t r e h tr u f d e n i a l p x e e b o t d e d e e n s d r o
w utiy .
.
A Backgroundoft heStudy
a ti l o
L , a conrtoversia l nove l wirtten by Vladimi r Nabokov , wa s
s i h t t a h t s e t o n ) 2 6 9 1 ( n o s l o G . k r o Y w e N n i 8 5 9 1 d n a s ir a P n i 5 5 9 1 n i d e h s il b u p
l e v o
n i sbannedi nEngland ,Burma ,Belgium ,andAusrtailasincet hethemeoft he
s i l e v o
n considereda saneroitcnovel( a sctiedi nJ enkins, 1997 ,p .32) .Thi snove l
n e l a m d e w o d i w e ti h w a f o n o i s s e f n o c a t u o b a s
i amed Humber tHumbetr . tI si
n o it c i p e d e h t s e v i g t a h t fl e s m i h t r e b m u H y b d e t a r r a n o s l
a o f hi sown obsession
a e ri m d a s y a w l a o t m i h s d a e l l e b a n n A h ti w e c n e ir e p x e t s a p s ’t r e b m u H
o e s u a c e b y a w a d e s s a p s a h o h w e v o l t s ri f s ’t r e b m u H s i l e b a n n A . t e h p m y
n f
z e r o l o D s t e e m t r e b m u H , l e b a n n A f o h t a e d e h t r e tf a s r a e y r u o f y t n e w T . s u h p y t
s g n o l e b m o o r a t n e r o t s t n a w e h n e h w , a ti l o L h ti w e v o l n i s ll a f e H . a ti l o L r o e z a H
e h t f o n e d r a g e h t n i a ti l o L s t e e m e H . r e h t o m s ’ a ti l o L s i o h w e z a H e t o lr a h C o t
n it e e m e h T . e s u o
h gremind shim ofAnnabel ,hisf ristl ove .Humber twantst o do
e t o lr a h C . r e h t o m r e h g n i y r r a m g n i d u l c n i a ti l o L o t r e s o l c t e g o t r e d r o n i g n i h t y r e v e
n i g n il l a f s i tr e b m u H t a h t s d n if y ll a n if e z a
H love wtih hi sdaughte ra tferr eading
y r a i d s ’t r e b m u
H .Knowing the fact ,she become sso jealou sand run sou tthe
e s u o
h . Unfo trunately ,a ca rhti she rand she passes away on the spot .A tfe r
s e s s a p r e h t o m s ’ a ti l o
L away ,Humber tbecome sasingleparen tfo rLoltia .Loltia
tr e b m u H d n
a sta trt herif orbiddenl oveadventurewhichnooneelseknow .s
s ’ v o k o b a N r i m i d a l
V Loltia i sal tierary work t ha tporrtay sal oveaffai r
p e t s a n e e w t e
b fathe randhi sdaughter .Danzige randJohnson( 1961)i nt hei rbook
d e lt it n
e An Introduciton to Ltierary Criitcsm say tha tltierature i sa way o f
e
r creaitng t heexpeirenceofl fiei nwords(p .8) .Event hough t hi snove lha sbeen
, l e v o n c it o r e n a s a d e r e d i s n o c s i t i e c n i s s e ir t n u o c e m o s n i d e n n a
b Vladimi r
s ’ v o k o b a
N Loltia b irng san hones tdepiciton o fhuman lfie. Nabokov himsel f
y ll u f s s e c c u
s creates t he rea lhuman’s l fie expeirence i n the conrtoversia lwords .
e fi l ’ s n a m u h n i n e p p a h y a m s g n i h t y n a m t a h t y ti l a e r e h t s w o h s l e v o n s i h T
e h t n e p o n a c s k r o w y r a r e ti l , s u h T . t o n r o t c a p m i l a i c o s d o o g s g n ir b t i r e h t e h w
s r e d a e r e h t f o s e y
o o b a t e b y a m h c i h w e fi l s i h t n i n e d d i h g n i h t e m o s s l a e v e r k r o w y r a r e ti L
, s k r o w y r a r e ti l e h t f o e n o s A . d e s s u c s i d e b o
t Loltiarevealst hes ecretl fieo fLoltia
h t e fi l f o y ti l a e r e h t s l a e v e r l e v o n s i h T . tr e b m u H d n
a a ta middle-aged man who
y ll u f s s e c c u s v o k o b a N r i m i d a l V . n e p p a h y a m t e h p m y n a f o e r u g if e h t s e ri m d a
f o n o it o m e e h t g n i w o h s s d r o w l u fi t u a e b s i h n i e c n e ir e p x e e fi l l a e r e h t s t c i p e d
. a ti l o L g n ir i m d a n i tr e b m u H
l
A ove affai r between a fathe rand a stepdaughter which exist s in
s ’ v o k o b a N r i m i d a l
V Loltiashowst hemisuseoff ather’sr olei naf amliy .Af athe r
e h , y l e t a n u tr o f n U . y li m a f s i h t c e t o r p d l u o h s o h w y li m a f a f o r e d a e l a s a e l o r a s a h
s i h h ti w r i a f f a e v o l a g n i v a h y b y ti r o h t u a s i h s e s u s i
m stepdaughter .Theloveaffai r
t o n s i h c i h w a ti l o L d n a t r e b m u H n e e w t e b p i h s n o it a l e r l a u x e s a s e v l o v n i o s l a f l e s ti
a n e e w t e b p i h s n o it a l e r l a u x e s e h T . y t e i c o s n i e u l a v l a r o m e h t h ti w e c n a d r o c c a n i
a d n a r e h t a
f stepdaughter doe sno talway shappen i n anove lbu talso i n t hereal
. e fi
l Nowadays, ti si frequenltyf oundt ha taf athe rcommti sas exualharassmentt o
s i
h stepdaughterbecausehecanno tconrtolt hes exua ldesrie swhichcomeupf rom
.f l e s m i
h
a d n a r e h t a f a n e e w t e b r i a f f a e v o l e h
T stepdaughterwhich existsi n t he
l e v o
n in lfuence smei n deciding t het opicoft hi sstudy .A tferr eadingt henovel , I
c i m a n y d s ’t r e b m u H t r e b m u H g n i y d u t s n i d e t s e r e t n i m
a s o fpersonaltiyi nhavinga
s i h h ti w r i a f f a e v o
l stepdaughter .According to Freud’ spsychoanalyitc theory ,
r a p s u o i c s n o c n u s ’ n a
m tha sasrtong i n lfuenceupon hi saciton ( a sctied i n Barry,
.
P ,2009 ,p .96) . Ianalyze Humber’t sdynamics o fpersonaltiy using Freud’ s
y s
e b s e c r o f g n i v ir d e h t s l a e v e r fl e s ti s i s y l a n
a hind Humber’t sacitoni nhavingal ove
s i h h ti w r i a f f
a stepdaughter.
h tr o w s i y d u t s s i h
T studying sincei tcan educateaf amliyt o maintaina
s u o i n o m r a
h relaitonship among famliy members .Thi sstudy reveal sthe d irving
’ r e h t a f a d n i h e b s e c r o
f sacitoni nhavingal oveaffai rwtihhi sstepdaughter.I tcan
a e v a h o t r e h t a f a s e v ir d t a h w n o y ll a i c e p s e s r e d a e r e h t o t e g d e l w o n k w e n g n ir b
s i h h ti w r i a f f a e v o
l stepdaughter .Mriro irng from thi sstudy ,we can preven ta
r e h t a
f -daughterl oveaffai rfromhappeninginaf amliy.
.
B ProblemFormula iton
o t s d n e t n i y d u t s s i h t , e v o b a d e t a t s y d u t s f o d n u o r g k c a b e h t n o d e s a B
w o H : s i m e l b o r p d e t a l u m r o f e h T . l e v o n e h t f o m e l b o r p d e t a l u m r o f e n o r e w s n
a a re
c i m a n y d s ’t r e b m u H t r e b m u
H s o fpersonaltiy in having a love affai rwtih hi s
r e t h g u a d p e t
s descirbedi nVladimi rNabokov’ sLoltia?
.
C Objecitveoft heStudy
s ’t r e b m u H t r e b m u H w o h t u o d n if o t s i y d u t s e h t f o e v it c e j b o e h T
c i m a n y
d s o fpersonaltiyinhaving al oveaffai rwtihhi sstepdaughterdescirbed i n
s ’ v o k o b a N r i m i d a l
V Loltia .
.
D Benefti soft heStudy
e h T . s r e d a e r r o f s i e n o t s ri f e h T . y d u t s e h t f o s ti f e n e b o w t e r a e r e h T
t l u s e r s i s y l a n
o e g d e l w o n k ’ s r e d a e
r f humans’lfiemriroredf rom thepsychology poin to fview .
c i m a n y d e h t t u o b a m e h t o t e g d e l w o n k w e n s g n ir b l e v o n s i h
T s o fpersonaltiy
e g d e l w o n k r i e h t h c ir n e o s l a n a c s i h T . n o it c a s ’ n a m u h e c n e u lf n i y a m h c i h
w o fthe
. e r u t a r e ti l d n a y g o l o h c y s p n e e w t e b n o it a l e r
r e h tr u
F more,t hi sstudycanalsoopent hemindoft her eaderst oseea l ot
s ’ v o k o b a N r i m i d a l V . e fi l s i h t n i n e p p a h y a m s g n i h t f
o Loltia reveal sthe story
s i h d n a r e h t a f a n e e w t e b r i a f f a e v o l a t u o b
a stepdaughter .Thi sphenomenon
i w o n k y B . e fi l l a e r e h t n i s n e p p a
h ng t herealtiy of l fie, t he reader smay c iritcize
il r i e h t n i n e p p a h y a m t a h t g n i h t f o d n i k y n
a ves .Thu ,s t hey can determine t hei r
n o it c
a s ands elec twhichonei sgoodandbadf ort hemandother .s
r o f s i e n o d n o c e s e h
T Pendidikan Bahasa Inggri s(PBI) student sin
a m r a h D a t a n a
S Universtiyi n paritcular .Thi sstudycanbear elfecitver eadingf o r
s ’ r e t c a r a h c e h t n o s e s u c o f y d u t s s i h t e c n i S . s r e h c a e t e r u t u f e h t s a s t n e d u t s I B P
c i m a n y
d s o fpersonaltiy , Ianalyzet hecharacter’ ssrtuctureo fpersonaltiy which
n o
c sist soft hei d,t heego ,andt hes uperego .Ther esul toft hiss tudyi sexpectedt o
w o h
s PB I students how to con rto l thei r acitons through developing
s r e h c a e t y h tl a e h y ll a c i g o l o h c y s
p .PB Istudent sast hef uturet eacher sareexpected
o t e l b a e b o
t develop thei rpsychologicallyheatlhy personailitesi n ordert ocreate
s e s s e c o r p g n i n r a e l e h t g n ir u d e r e h p s o m t a d o o g
a .Therefore, t hey can contirbute
s a y ti c a p a c e h t n i r o f k r o w r o h ti w k r o w y e h t r e v e o h w n o s e c n e u lf n i d o o g
.
E De ifniitono fTerms
. d e if ir a l c e b o t d e e n y d u t s s i h t o t d e t a l e r s m r e t y e k e m o s , n o it c e s s i h t n I
t x e n e h t o t g n i d e e c o r p e r o f e b s g n i d n a t s r e d n u s i m d i o v a o t r e d r o n i e n o d s i s i h T
c i m a n y d e r a s m r e t y e k e h T . s r e t p a h
c s personaltiyandl oveaffai.r
.
1 Dynamics o fPersonaltiy
n i d r o c c
A g to Freud ,dynamic so fpersonaltiy are used to explain the
n o it c a s ’ e l p o e p d n i h e b s e c r o f g n i v ir
d s (a sctied in Fe tis ,2006 p .35) .Freud
n o it c a r i e h t n o p u e c n e u lf n i g n o rt s a s a h d n i m s u o i c s n o c n u s ’ e l p o e p t a h t s e v e il e
b s
, y r r a B n i d e ti c s a
( 2009 ,p .96) . tI means t ha tdynamic so fpersonaltiy show the
e l p o e p d n i h e b s s e c o r p g n i v ir
d ’ s acitons which de irve from thei runconsciou s
y ti l a n o s r e p f o e r u t c u rt s e h t n i t c il f n o c s e v l o v n i fl e s ti s s e c o r p g n i v ir d e h T . d n i m
h c i h w d i e h t e r a y e h T . s tr a p e e r h t f o s t s i s n o c h c i h
w work sbased on pleasure
o g e r e p u s e h t ,s e l p i c n ir
p which i s the representaiton o fmora lvalue ,and t heego
c i m a n y d e h t s ll a c o s l a d u e r F . r e k a m n o i s i c e d e h t s i h c i h
w s o fpersonaltiy a sa
a v it o
m itona lp irnciple( a sctiedi nFeist ,2006p .35) .Hepoint soutt ha tpeopleare
e z y l a n a l li w I , y d u t s s i h t n I . y t e i x n a e c u d e r d n a e r u s a e l p k e e s o t d e t a v it o m
c i m a n y d s ’t r e b m u
H s o f personaltiy in having a love affai r wtih Loltia ,hi s
r e t h g u a d p e t
s . Humber’t s dynamic so fpersonaltiy are analyzed through the
g n o m a t c il f n o
c the id ,the superego ,and the ego which are inside Humber t
.f l e s m i h
.
2 LoveA ff air
o t g n i d r o c c
A Longman Dicitonary o fEngilsh Language o fCutlure, a
a “ s i r i a f f a e v o
( ” e l p o e p r e h t o o t d e ir r a m e r a o h w r o d e ir r a
m “loveaffari”.) Based on The New
e g a u g n a L h s il g n E f o y r a n o it c i D e v i s n e h e r p m o C s ’ r e ts b e W l a n o it a n r e t n I
n o it i d E c i d e p o l c y c n
E , l ove affari i s“a romanitcattachmen tbetween t wo people
( ” r e h t o h c a e o t d e ir r a m t o
n “loveaffari”.) I n t hi sstudy aloveaffarir eferst o t he
s i h d n a , tr e b m u H t r e b m u H , r e h t a f a n e e w t e b p i h s n o it a l e
8 R E T P A H
C I I
E R U T A R E T I L D E T A L E R F O W E I V E R
a h c s i h
T pte rconsist soft hreepatrs .Theyaret her eviewofr elatedstudy ,
f o w e i v e r e h t n I . k r o w e m a r f l a c it e r o e h t e h t d n a , s e ir o e h t d e t a l e r f o w e i v e r e h t
s ’ v o k o b a N r i m i d a l V o t d e t a l e r s e i d u t s e m o s w e i v e r I , y d u t s d e t a l e
r Loltia .In t he
s e ir o e h t d e t a l e r f o w e i v e
r ,I r eviewsomet heo ire sused i n t hi sstudy .Thel as tpar t
e h t e s u o t w o h e t a r o b a l e I e r e h w k r o w e m a r f l a c it e r o e h t e h t s i o w t r e t p a h c f o
. l e v o n e h t g n i z y l a n a r o f s e ir o e h t
.
A Reviewo fRelatedStudies
s ’ v o k o b a N r i m i d a l
V Loltia ha sbeen used in the two previou sstudies .
s i n o s r e p t s ri f e h T . l e v o n e h t g n i z y l a n a n i s c i p o t t n e r e f fi d e v a h m e h t f o h t o B
r e tt e L h s il g n E m o r f o n o s k a c i
W s batch 1999 .Hi sthesis ’ itlte i sReading a sA
. a ti l o L s ’ v o k o b a N r i m i d a l V n i n o it a t e r p e t n I d n a n o it a c i n u m m o
C He appile s
tr a
B hesian wrtielry tex tapproach to analyze the novel .Hi sstudy on Vladimi r
s ’ v o k o b a
N Loltia focuse son t hediscussion ofHumber’t scharacter sand t heuse
f
o Batrhesian wrtielry tex tin producing a communicaitve interpretaiton from
.r e d a e r s i h o t v o k o b a N
hT e second thesi si senitlted Symbol sand Figuraitve Language a s
y b a ti l o L s ’ v o k o b a N f o e m e h T e h t g n ir e v il e D f o s n a e
M Kasauly from Engilsh
r e tt e
. e m e h t e h t r e v il e d o t d e s u y l e v it c e f f
e Accordingt o he rstudy, t hesymbo landt he
s i h c i h w n o i s s e s b o l a u x e s f o t c e f f e d n a e s u a c e h t w o h s n a c e g a u g n a l e v it a r u g if
. l e v o n e h t n i d e t n e s e r p
t r e b m u H n o s e s u c o f t I . s e n o s u o i v e r p e h t m o r f t n e r e f fi d s i y d u t s s i h T
c i m a n y d s ’t r e b m u
H so fpersonaltiy which have a very srtong in lfuence to the
c i m a n y d s ’t r e b m u H . l e v o
n s o fpersonaltiy in having a love affai ra re analyzed
y b d e s o p o r p y r o e h t c it y l a n a o h c y s p h ti w d e n i b m o c h c a o r p p a l a c i g o l o h c y s p g n i s u
d u e r
F (1856 – 1939) . Ianalyze the d irving force sbehind Humbetr’ saciton in
s i h h ti w r i a f f a e v o l a g n i v a
h stepdaughter.
.
B Reviewo fRelatedTheories
.
1 Psychologica lApproach
e r u t a r e ti l o t h c a o r p p a l a c it ir c a “ t a h t y a s ) 1 7 9 1 ( s d o o W d n a r e g r e b r h o R
a v e v it i s o p d n a , n o it c n u f , e r u t a n s ti f o g n i d n a t s r e d n u n a s e t a ti s s e c e
n lues”( p .19) .
s r e d a e r e h t p l e h o t e l o r t n a tr o p m i s a h e r u t a r e ti l o t h c a o r p p a l a c it ir c a t a h t s n a e m t I
e b r h o R . k r o w y r a r e ti l e h t d n a t s r e d n
u rge rand Wood s(1971 )also notethat t here
o i b e h t , h c a o r p p a t s il a m r o f e h t e r a y e h t ; e r u t a r e ti l o t s e h c a o r p p a e v if e r
a graphica l
l a r u tl u c o i c o s e h t , h c a o r p p
a -histo irca lapproach, t hemythopoeicapproach ,andt he
p ( h c a o r p p a l a c i g o l o h c y s
p p 6 . -15) .Thestudyo fHumber tHumber’t sdynamics fo
y ti l a n o s r e
p in having a love affai rwtih hi sstepdaughter use spsychologica l
. h c a o r p p
a
h c a o r p p a l a c i g o l o h c y s p “ t a h t t u o t n i o p ) 1 1 0 2 ( m a h g n il li W d n a n ir e u G
s e c r o f l a c i g o l o h c y s p y b d e t a v it o m e r a s n o it c a s ’ n a m u h t a h t s e t a t s d u e r F
n ir e u G n i d e ti c s a ( l o rt n o c d e ti m il e v a h h c i h
w & Wliilngham ,2 101 ,p .203) .
h d u e r
F imsel fpropose ssome p irnciple srelated to psychoanalyitc theory .Thi s
s ’t r e b m u H e z y l a n a o t y r o e h t c it y l a n a o h c y s p s ’ d u e r F n i s e l p i c n ir p e m o s s e s u y d u t s
c i m a n y
d s o fpersonaltiyinhavingal oveaffai rwtihLoltia.
.
a TheStructureo fPersonaltiy
d u e r
F p pro osest hreemodel so fpsyche ,namelythei d,t hesuperego ,and
o g e e h
t .TheyareproposedbyFreudi nordert oexplaint hebehavio robservaiton s
y b d e c a l p s n o it c ir t s e r e h t , s e ri s e d g n i v l o v n i s e s i m o r p m o c e h t m o r f t l u s e r t a h t
d e z il a n r e t n i e h t d n a , t n e m n o ri v n
e mora lvalues( a sctiedi n Weine,r 1980 ,p .14) .
. o g e r e p u s e h t d n a , o g e e h t , d i e h t f o t p e c n o c e h t e r a s g n i w o ll o f e h T
)
1 TheI d
y ll a t o t d n a y ti l a n o s r e p f o e r o c e h t t a s i d i e h t , d u e r F o t g n i d r o c c A
r h ti w t c a t n o c o n s a h d i e h t t a h t s m i a l c d u e r F . s u o i c s n o c n
u ealtiy and i talway s
,t s i e F n i d e ti c s a ( e ri s e d c i s a b g n i y f s it a s y b n o i s n e t e c u d e r o t y lt n a t s n o c s e ir t
o t g n i d r o c c A . ) 7 2 . p , 6 0 0
2 Freud ,“the id consist so feverything psychologica l
c s a ( ” s t c n it s n i e h t s a h c u s , h tr i b t a d e t s i x e t a h t d n a d e ti r e h n i s i h c i h
w tiedi n Hall
& Lindzey, 1970 ,p .32) .
n o it a t n e s e r p e r l a c i g o l o h c y s p n r o b n i n a s i t c n it s n i n a “ t a h t s e t a t s o s l a d u e r F
” n o it a ti c x e f o e c r u o s c it a m o s r e n n i n a f
o (a sctiedi nHall&Lindzey ,1970 ,p .36) .
r e t e d d n a r o i v a h e b e v ir d n a c t c n it s n i t a h t s n i a l p x e e
e s u a c e t a m it l u e h t e r a s t c n it s n i “ t a h t s e v e il e
b o fal lacitvtiy”( a sctiedi nHjelle &
r e l g e i
Z ,1981 ,p .37) .I tmean stha tthe insitncts conrto love rthe aciton sby
s r a l u c it r a p r o f y ti v it i s n e s s ’ n a m u h g n i s a e r c n
i itmulaiton .Freudnotest hati nsitnct s
, s tr a p o w t o t n i d e if i s s a l c e b n a
c namelythel fiei nsitnct sandt hedeathi nsitncts( a s
l l a H n i d e ti
c &Lindzey ,1970,p .38-3 9 .)
)
a Thel fiei nsitncts
Thet ermofl fiei nsitncti so tfenr eferred t osexuali nsitnct .Accordingt o
l a i c a r d n a l a v i v r u s l a u d i v i d n i f o e s o p r u p e h t e v r e s s t c n it s n i e fi l e h t “ , d u e r F
( ” n o it a g a p o r
p a sctiedi nHall&Lindzey ,1970, p .38 .) I tmeanst hatt hisi nsitncts
. n o it c u d o r p e r d n a , e r u s a e l p , l a v i v r u s c i s a b h ti w l a e
d Hunger ,th rist ,and sex
l e
b ongt o t hi scategory .Freud beilevest hatt hesex i nsitnct i st hemos tsailen to f
d e ti c s a ( y ti l a n o s r e p f o t n e m p o l e v e d e h t r o f s t c n it s n i e fi l e h
t Hjelle & Ziegler ,
e c r o f y g r e n e c i h c y s p a s i t i , o d i b il m r e t e h t s e s o p o r p o s l a d u e r F . ) 7 3 . p , 1 8 9 1
il r e d n u h c i h
w e sthe sexua linsitnc t(a sctied in Hal l& Lindzey, 1970 ,p .38) .
. s e it i v it c a l a u x e s m o r f n o it a c if it a r g s ti s k e e s s y a w l a f l e s ti o d i b i L
)
b Thedeathi nsitncts
s s e l h c u m k r o w r i e h t m r o fr e p s t c n it s n i e v it c u rt s e d r o s t c n it s n i h t a e d e h T
e h t n a h t y l s u o u c i p s n o
c lfie i nsitncts .According t o Freud ,“the goa lo fall l fie i s
” h t a e
d (a s ctied in Weiner , 1980 , p . 14) . He assume s tha t a person ha s
. e i d o t h s i w s u o i c s n o c n u
l p i c n ir p e r u s a e l p o t g n i d r o c c a s e t a r e p o d i e h t “ , d u e r F o t g n i d r o c c
A e o r
e n ir t c o d e h
t o fhedonism"( a sctiedi nWeiner ,1980,p .14) .Heassumest hatt hei d
o t s d a e l h c i h w y g r e n e t n e m e r c n i e h t e t a r e l o t t o n n a
m s i n a h c e
m s .Accordingt oFreud ,egodefensemechanisms ea r usedbyt hepeople
n i s o p p o e r u s s e r p d n a d i e h t f o s e s l u p m i e v i s s e r g g a e h t t s n i a g a d n e f e d o
t g
( o g e r e p u
s a sctied Hjelle& Ziegler, 1981 ,p .47.) Freud also notes t hat t heego
m s i n a h c e m e s n e f e
d s areusedt oprotec tpeoplef romexcessiveanxiety.
m s i n a h c e m e s n e f e d f o a e d i e h
T s i sfrislty elaborated by Freud i n 1926 .
d u e r F a n n A , r e t h g u a d s i h n e h
T ,reifned t he concep to fego defend mechanisms .
m s i n a h c e m e s n e f e d f o s l a p i c n ir p t h g i e e r a e r e h
T swhich are idenit ifed by Freud
, n o i s s e r g e r , n o it a x if , t n e m e c a l p s i d , n o it a m r o f n o it c a e r , n o i s s e r p e r g n i d u l c n i
( n o it a m il b u s d n a , s n o it c e j o rt n i , n o it c e j o r
p a sctiedi nFeist ,2006 ,p .35- )3 . 8
)
1 Repression
t a h t s y a s d u e r F . m s i n a h c e m e s n e f e d c i s a b t s o m e h t s i n o i s s e r p e R
y b f l e s ti s t c e t o r p t i , s e s l u p m i d i e l b a ri s e d n u y b d e n e t a e r h t s i o g e e h t r e v e n e h w
s g n il e e f g n i n e t a e r h t s e c r o f o g e e h t , s u h T . s e s l u p m i e s o h t g n i s s e r p e
r into the
t a h t s e it il i b i s s o p l a r e v e s e b l li w e r e h t t a h t s e v e il e b d u e r F . ) 5 3 . p ( s u o i c s n o c n u
s e s l u p m i e h t s i e n o t s ri f e h T . ) 5 3 . p ( s u o i c s n o c n u e m o c e b s e s l u p m i e h t n e h w t s i x e
c s e s l u p m i e h t , d n o c e S . s u o i c s n o c n u e h t n i d e g n a h c n u n i a m e r y a
m a n forcet hei r
y a
w intoconsciousnessi nanunatleredf orm ,wheret heywli lcreatemoreanxiety
n i d e s s e r p x e e r a s e s l u p m i e h t s i e n o t s a l e h T . e l d n a h d l u o c n o s r e p e h t n a h t
. m r o f d e c a l p s i d
)
2 ReacitonFormaiton
a e r d u e r F o t g n i d r o c c
A citon formaiton refer sto the way to repres s
)
5 Regression
e r e h t s i n o i s s e r g e r , d u e r F o t g n i d r o c c
A version to an earile rstage o f
r e il r a e t a h t o t k c a b t r e v e r o t s e ir t n o i s s e r g e r t a h t s e t a t s d u e r F . ) 6 3 . p ( t n e m p o l e v e d
d e t a x if h ti w y ti r a li m i s s a h r o i v a h e b e v i s s e r g e R . t n a s a e l p e r o m s a w h c i h w e g a t s
a u s u e r a s n o i s s e r g e R . e li t n a f n i d n a d i g ir s i h c i h w r o i v a h e
b llyt emporary ,wherea s
. t n e n a m r e p s s e l e r a s n o it a x if
)
6 Projeciton
e v ir d e l b a t p e c c a n u g n it u b ir tt a f o s s e c o r p a s a n o it c e j o r p s e if it n e d i d u e r F
n o it c e j o r p f o e l p m a x e n a s e v i g o s l a d u e r F .) 7 3 . p ( t n e m n o ri v n e r o e l p o e p r e h t o o t
i s i o h w n a m a n i s t s i x e h c i h
w nterestedi na ifgureo folde rwoman .Consciously ,
t u b , m i h r o f g n it s u g s i d s i n a m o w r e d l o h ti w e s r u o c r e t n i l a u x e s t a h t s k n i h t e h
. d n i m s u o i c s n o c n u s i h o t d e t n a l p n e e b s a h n a m o w t a h t o t n o it c a rt t a c it o r e g n o rt s
g n u o y e h t t a h t s n i a l p x e d u e r F , e l p m a x e t a h t n
I mant irest o beilevet ha theha sno
d n a y t e i x n a s i h f o t s o m s e s a r e n o it c e j o r p s i h T . n a m o w r e d l o o t s g n il e e f l a u x e s
n a m o w r e d l o n a n i t s e r e t n i l a u x e s a n i a t n i a m o t m i h g n it ti m r e p s p e e k t i t u b , tl i u g
. r e h t o m s i h f o m i h s d n i m e r o h w
)
7 Inrtojeciton
t c e j o rt n
I ion i sa proces swhere people adop tposiitve quailite so fothe r
, s f e il e b , s e u l a v e h t t p o d a y a m e l p o e p t a h t s y a s d u e r F . o g e n w o r i e h t o t n i e l p o e p
e h t e c u d e r o t r e d r o n i m e h t r o f e v it i s o p d e r e d i s n o c e r a h c i h w s m s ir e n n a m d n a
)
8 Subilmaiton
y b m i a l a u x e s e h t f o n o i s s e r p e r e h t s i n o it a m il b u s , d u e r F o t g n i d r o c c A
e b n a c n o it a m il b u s e h t t a h t s e t a t s d u e r F . m i a l a i c o s r o l a r u tl u c a h ti w g n it u ti t s b u s
. e r u t a r e ti l d n a , c i s u m , tr a s a h c u s t n e m h s il p m o c c a l a r u tl u c g n it a e r c n i d e s s e r p x e
t a h t s e v e il e b e
H thear to fMichaelangelo i san excellen texampleo fsubilmaiton
o d i b il s i h s e t u ti t s b u s e h t a h t d n u o f s i o l e g n a l e a h c i M , d u e r F o t g n i d r o c c A . ) 8 3 . p (
. g n it p l u c s d n a g n it n i a p h ti w
.
C Theore itca lFramework
y r o e h t c it y l a n a o h c y s p w o h n i a l p x e I , tr a p s i h t n
I i sused t o answert he
n i e m e d i u g n a c t i e c n i s t n a tr o p m i y r e v s i s i h T . y d u t s s i h t f o m e l b o r p d e t a l u m r o f
l a n
a yzingt henovel .Thi sstudyusespsychologica lapproachandt hi sstudyis also
y r o e h t c it y l a n a o h c y s p n i s e l p i c n ir p e m o s y b d e d i u
g whichareproposedbyFreud .
h c
I oosepsychologica lapproach for t hi sstudy since t hi sstudy focuses
s ’t r e b m u H t r e b m u H e z y l a n a I . y ti l a n o s r e p f o s c i m a n y d s ’ r e t c a r a h c e h t n o
c i m a n y
d s o fpersonaltiy using psychoanalyitc theory proposed by Freud .There
r
aet wo p irnciplesi n psychoanalyitct ha t Iuset o analyzeHumber’t sdynamic so f
e n o t s ri f e h T . y ti l a n o s r e
p ist hesrtuctureo fpersonaltiy which i sused t o analyze
d n a , o g e , d i s i h s i h m o r f d e t c i p e d s a t r e b m u H f o e r u t c u rt s y ti l a n o s r e p e h t
s i e n o d n o c e s e h T . o g e r e p u
s the p irnciple o fego defense mechanism swhich is
e h t y b d e s u a c y t e i x n a m o r f fl e s m i h g n it c e t o r p n i n o it c a s ’t r e b m u H e z y l a n a o t d e s u
e m e s n e f e
d chanisms proposed by Freud , Ican analyze Humber’t sdynamics fo
y ti l a n o s r e
1 2
I I I R E T P A H C
Y G O L O D O H T E M
s tr a p e e r h t o t n i d e d i v i d s i r e t p a h c s i h
T ,namely theobjec tof t hestudy ,
n o s e s u c o f tr a p t s ri f e h T . y d u t s e h t f o d o h t e m e h t d n a , y d u t s e h t f o h c a o r p p a e h t
o t d e s u s i t a h t h c a o r p p a e h t s e s s u c s i d t r a p d n o c e s e h T . y d u t s s i h t f o t c e j b o e h t
t s a l e h T . l e v o n e h t e z y l a n
a par ti sthe method o fthe study, i tdiscusse sthe
. a t a d e h t g n i z y l a n a d n a g n ir e h t a g n i e s u I t a h t e r u d e c o r p
.
A Objec toft heStudy
d e lt it n e l e v o n a s a w y d u t s e h t f o t c e j b o e h
T Loltia w irttenbyaRussian
s ’ v o k o b a N r i m i d a l V . v o k o b a N r i m i d a l V , r o h t u
a Loltiawasf ris tpub ilshedi n1955
i p m il O y
b aPress ,Pairs .Thenove lusedf ort hi sstudywa spubilshed by Penguin
. s r e t p a h c 6 3 f o s t s i s n o c d n a s e g a p 1 6 3 s a h f l e s ti l e v o n e h T . 1 0 0 2 n i l a it n e s s E
a ti l o
L ,t heconfessiono fawh tiewidowedmale, i sopenedbyaf oreword
l a n o it c if e h t y b n e tt ir
w wrtie r John Ray. He admti stha the ha sreceived a
n h o J s k s a k r a l C . q s E , k r a l C e t a o h C e c n e r a l C , d n e ir f d o o g s i h m o r f t p ir c s u n a m
t a h t f o r o h t u a e h t s i o h w t n e il c s i h f o t s e u q e r e h t n o d e s a b t x e t e h t ti d e o t y a R
l a e r e h t t a h t s r e d a e r e h t s m r o f n i y a R n h o J . t p ir c s u n a
m autho ro fthe sc irpt ,
r e b m e v o N n o s i s o b m o r h t y r a n o r o c f o , y ti v it p a c l a g e l n i s e i d , tr e b m u H t r e b m u H
n o it a r o l p x e s ’ d u e r
F o f unconsciou s mind b irng s a grea t contirbuiton to
n o it c a s ’ n a m u h t a h t s d n if d n i m s u o i c s n o c n u n o a e d i s i H . h c a o r p p a l a c i g o l o h c y s p
s u o i c s n o c n u y b d e c n e u lf n i s
i mind. Psychologica lapproach which w sa used i n
d e p l e h y d u t s s i h
t me in analyzing the character’ sdynamics o fpersonaltiy .By
c i m a n y d s ’t r e b m u H g n i z y l a n
a s personaltiy , Icould understand t ha tunconsciou s
d a h d n i
m a big contirbuiton to d irve Humber tin having a love affai rwtih hi s
r e t h g u a d p e t
s ,Loltia .
.
C Methodofs tudy
y r a r b il o t s g n o l e b y d u t s s i h
T research. According t oGeorge( 2008 ,)t he
f o s c it s ir e t c a r a h
c ilbrary research method are identfiying and locaitng source s
r o n o it a m r o f n i l a u t c a f e v a h h c i h
w exper topinion .( )p 2 . 3 Thi smethodwa susedt o
e r e w e r e h T . y d u t s s i h t r o f n o it a m r o f n i t n a tr o p m i d e d i v o r p t a h t s e c r u o s e h t y fi t n e d i
s e c r u o s f o s d n i k o w
t ,namelyt hep irmarysource sa end t h secondary sources .The
s a w y d u t s s i h t f o e c r u o s y r a m ir
p Loltia ,a nove lw irtten by Vladimi rNabokov .
e h t m o r f n e k a t s e l c it r a d n a s k o o b e m o s e r e w y d u t s s i h t f o s e c r u o s y r a d n o c e s e h T
. l e v o n e h t g n i z y l a n a n i d e s u e r e w h c i h w t e n r e t n
i VriginiaTech(2007) point sout
h c r a e s e r y r a r b il a g n it c u d n o c n i s p e t s n e v e
s ,namely choosing t he t opic , ifnding
u o r g k c a
b nd i nformaiton , ifnding book son t he t opic ,using databases/ i ndexest o
n o s e l c it r a l a c i d o ir e p d n
if thet opic ,evaluaitngwha thavebeen found ,w iritngt he
y h p a r g o il b i b e h t g n it t a m r o f d n a , r e p a
p .
f o p e t s t s ri f e h
T the ilbrarys tudyw aschoosingt hetopic.I r eadt henove l
d e lt it n
l e v o n e h t g n i d a e r d e h s i n if I r e tf A . fl e s ti l e v o n e h t f o a e d i n i a m e h t d n a t s r e d n u o t
e h t e d i c e d o t d e u n it n o c I , e m it t s ri f e h t r o
f topic fo rthe analysis . Idecided to
e z y l a n
a the character’ sdynamics o fpersonaltiy in having a love affai rwtih hi s
r e t h g u a d p e t
s .
a w p e t s d n o c e s e h
T s ifndingbackgroundi nformaiton .A tfe rdecidingt he
o t d e u n it n o c I , c i p o
t rereadt henovel . I ktoo somei mpo tran tquotaitonsi nordert o
c i m a n y d s ’t r e b m u H t r e b m u H f o n o it c i p e d e h t e v a
h s fo personaltiy. Atfer t hat , I
u s d n a s m r e t y e k g n i y fi t n e d i h g u o r h t n o it a m r o f n i d n u o r g k c a b e h t d n
if bjec to fmy
d e tl u s n o c I . c i p o
t thet ermsi n agenera ldicitonary, encyclopedia ,o rothe rsubjec t
. s e c r u o s
e h
T nex tstep swere ifndingbook sand usingdatabases/ i ndexest o ifnd
d n if o t d e ir t I , p e t s s i h t n I . c i p o t e h t n o s e l c it r a l a c i d o ir e
p and r eadsomet heo ire s
y fi s s a l c d n
a which theory tha thad relaiton to my study. A tfe rreading and
t a h t y r o e h t c it y l a n a o h c y s p n i s e l p i c n ir p e m o s d n u o f I , s e ir o e h t e m o s g n i w e i v e r
e m p l e h d l u o
c ou twhenconducitngthes tudy .Thiss tepcouldgivemeadepiciton
c i m a n y d s ’t r e b m u H t r e b m u H e z y l a n a o t w o h f
o s o f personaltiy by using
n a o h c y s
p alyitc theory .When Ihad ifnished reading and deciding the theory
. y d u t s s i h t r o f d e s u I h c a o r p p a h c i h w d e d i c e d I , y d u t s y m o t d e t a l e
r
p e t s t x e n e h
T wa sevaluaitngwha thad beenf ound.Int hi sstep,I t iredt o
e h t a g n e e b d a h t a h t s e c r u o s e h t ll a e t a u l a v
e r . ed Then, Imadearelaiton between
y r o e h t c it y l a n a o h c y s p d n a y d u t s y
m .Thi sstep wa sveryi mpo trantt o answert he
. e d a m d a h I m e l b o r p d e t a l u m r o
r e tf
A evaluaiton , Ista tred to wrtie t he thesi swhich consisted o f ifve
s r e t p a h
c , namely the inrtoduciton , the review o f related ltierature, the
, y g o l o d o h t e
m theanalysis, andtheconclusion .When Ihaddrawnaconclusiono n
i m a n y d s ’t r e b m u
H cs personaltiy in having a l ove affai rwtih hi sstepdaughter , I
n o it s e g g u s e h t d e d i v o r
p fort her eader sandt hef uturer esearchers . Ialsoprovided
d e t c e n n o c y d u t s s i h t f o n o it c e lf e r e h
t w tih teaching ifeld by making a re lfeciton
t u o b
a developingapsychologicallyheatlhyt eache.r
a w p e t s t s a l e h
T sformatitng bibilography .A tfer w iritng the thesis , I
f o t a m r o f e h t e d a
m the bibilography . I ilsted down al lthe ctiaitons which were
6 2
V I R E T P A H C
S I S Y L A N A
n e e b s a h h c i h w m e l b o r p d e t a l u m r o f e h t r e w s n a o t s m i a r e t p a h c s i h T
s i y d u t s s i h t f o m e l b o r p d e t a l u m r o f e h t , e r o f e b d e t a t s s A . I r e t p a h c n i d e t a t
s how
s i h h ti w r i a f f a e v o l a g n i v a h n i y ti l a n o s r e p f o s c i m a n y d s ’t r e b m u H t r e b m u H
r e t h g u a d p e t
s are descirbed in Vladimi rNabokov’ sLoltia. In thi sstudy , Iapply
y b d e s o p o r p y r o e h t c it y l a n a o h c y s
p Freud to analyze Humber t Humber’t s
o w t e r a e r e h T . a ti l o L h ti w r i a f f a e v o l a g n i v a h n i y ti l a n o s r e p f o s c i m a n y d
, y d u t s s i h t n i d e s u e r a h c i h w c it y l a n a o h c y s p f o s e l p i c n ir
p namely thesrtuctureo f
. s m s i n a h c e m e s n e f e d e h t d n a y ti l a n o s r e p
h c i h w y ti l a n o s r e p f o s c i m a n y d s ’t r e b m u
H a re the main focu so fthi s
r i a f f a e v o l a g n i v a h n i n o it c a s ’t r e b m u H d n i h e b s e c r o f g n i v ir d e h t o t s r e f e r y d u t s
s i h h ti
w stepdaughter .Thed irvingf orcest hemselvesi nvolvet heconfilc tbetween
i h w d i e h t t a h t t u o s t n i o p d u e r F . o g e e h t d n a , o g e r e p u s e h t , d i e h
t ch work sbased
( e ri s e d c i s a b e h t y f s it a s o t s e ir t s y a w l a s e l p i c n ir p e r u s a e l p e h t n
o a sctied i nFeist ,
, 6 0 0
2 p .27) .Ont heconrtary ,Freudalsos tatest hatt hepleasurep irncipleoft hei d
d e s o p p o s
i t o the superego which i sguided by t hemora lp irnciples (a sctied i n
, t s i e
F 2006 ,p .30) .Theconfilc tbetween t hei d and t hesuperego cause sanxiety
r e v
o Humber thimsefl .Anxiety exist sbecause t here i safea ro fsefl-punishmen t
e h t f o n o it c n u f e h t n i d e p o l e v e d s e u l a v e v it c e p s e r e h t o t y r a rt n o c g n it c a r o f
p u
e s n e f e d o g e t a h t s y a s d u e r F s a s m s i n a h c e m e s n e f e d g n i y o l p m e h g u o r h t y t e i x n a
e h t t s n i a g a d n e f e d o t e l p o e p e h t y b d e s u e r a h c i h w s e i g e t a rt s e r a s m s i n a h c e m
d i e h t f o s e s l u p m i e v i s s e r g g
a and pressureopposing superego i n ordert o reileve
( y t e i x n
a a sctiedHjelle&Ziegler ,1981 ,p .47 .)
f o s i s y l a n a e h
T Humber tHumber’t sdynamic so fpersonaltiyi nhavinga
h c i h w s e s s e c o r p o w t e h t n o d e s a b s tr a p o w t o t n i d e d i v i d s i a ti l o L h ti w r i a f f a e v o l
e s n e f e d f o s l a p i c n ir p t h g i e s e s o p o r p d u e r F . s m s i n a h c e m e s n e f e d o w t m r o f
, s m s i n a h c e
m namely repression , reaciton formaiton , displacement , ifxaiton ,
n o it a m il b u s d n a , s n o it c e j o rt n i , n o it c e j o r p , n o i s s e r g e
r (a sctied in Feist ,2006 ,p .
5
3 -38) . Based on the analysi s o f Humber’t s aciton , he doe s two defense
n o it a l e r n i s m s i n a h c e
m t eo t h d irving force sbehind hi saciton in having a love
a ti l o L h ti w r i a f f
a , t hey aredisplacemen tand r eaciton f ormaiton .Thef ris tpar to f
h c i h w n i m s i n a h c e m e s n e f e d a s i h c i h w t n e m e c a l p s i d e h t n o d e s u c o f s i s y l a n a e h t
( s t c e j b o r e h t o o t n o s e c a l p s i d e v ir d e l b a t p e c c a n u e h
t a sctiedi nFeis,t2006 ,p .36) .
s ’ v o k o b a N r i m i d a l V n
I Loltia, t hecase o fdisplacement i sfound when Humber t
r e h f o s r a e y r u o f y t n e w t r e tf a a ti l o L h ti w l e b a n n A f o e r u g if e h t e c a l p s i d o t s e ir t
o t s r e f e r h c i h w n o it a m r o f n o it c a e r s i m s i n a h c e m e s n e f e d d n o c e s e h T . h t a e d
( e s i u g s i d a g n it p o d
a a sctied i n Feis,t2006 ,p .35) .Thecaseofr eacitonf ormaiton
n o it a l e r s i h s w o h s e h t a h t t c a f e h t n i s r a e p p a t r e b m u H n
i w tih Loltia i sa rea l
s a a ti l o L e v a h o t s t n a w e h , y ll a u t c a t u b , r e t h g u a d a d n a r e h t a f a n e e w t e b n o it a l e r
o s i s y l a n a e h T . r e v o l s i
h f Humber’t sdynamic so fpersonaltiy in having a love
o t e c a l p e n o m o r f l e v a rt o t s e d i c e d n e h t e H . a ti l o L h ti w r i a f f a e v o l a e v a h o t m i h
. r e h h ti w r i a f f a e v o l a e v a h d n a a ti l o L h ti w a c ir e m A d n u o r a r e h t o n a
f o s i s y l a n a e h
T Humber’t sdynamic so fpersonaltiy in having a love
h t s w o h s a ti l o L h ti w r i a f f
a a thi spersonaltiyi sdominatedbyt hesrtongd irvef rom
h ti w r i a f f a e v o l a g n i v a h y b t c n it s n i l a u x e s e h t s e if it a r g y ll a n if o g e e h T . d i e h t
o g e e h T . e fi l s ’t r e b m u H m o r f l e b a n n A e c a l p s i d y ll u f s s e c c u s n a c o h w a ti l o L
o c h c i h w t c n it s n i l a u x e s e h t l e p s i d t o n n a
c mesf romt hei ds incet hei dhass rtonge r
2 4
V R E T P A H C
S N O I T S E G G U S D N A S N O I S U L C N O C
t s ri f e h T . s tr a p o w t f o s t s i s n o c h c i h w s i s e h t e h t f o r e t p a h c t s a l e h t s i s i h T
e h T . m e l b o r p d e t a l u m r o f e h t s r e w s n a h c i h w s i s y l a n a e h t f o s n o i s u l c n o c e h t s i tr a p
e r u t u f e h t r o f y d u t s e h t f o t l u s e r e h t g n i d r a g e r n o it s e g g u s e h t s i t r a p d n o c e s
e t d n a r e h c r a e s e
r acher .s
.
A Conclusions
e h t r e w s n a h c i h w s i s y l a n a e h t f o s n o i s u l c n o c e h t h ti w s l a e d t r a p s i h T
t u o d n if o t d e d n e t n i s i y d u t s s i h t f o m e l b o r p d e t a l u m r o f e h T . m e l b o r p d e t a l u m r o f
s i h h ti w r i a f f a e v o l a g n i v a h n i y ti l a n o s r e p f o s c i m a n y d s ’t r e b m u H w o h
r e t h g u a d p e t
s are desc irbe in Vladimi r Nabokov’ s Loltia . The dynamics fo
y ti l a n o s r e
p referto t hed irving force sbehind Humber’t saciton i n having a l ove
s e v l o v n i t I . a ti l o L h ti w r i a f f
a a confilc tin the srtucture o fpersonaltiy which
h t , d i e h t f o s t s i s n o
c es uperego ,andt heego .
t a h t s t n i o p t n a tr o p m i o w t e r a e r e h
T canbeconcluded f romt heanalysis .
e c a l p s i d o t r e d r o n i t n e m e c a l p s i d s e o d e h t a h t d n u o f s i tr e b m u H s i e n o t s ri f e h T
t c il f n o c e h t f o e s u a c e b s n e p p a h t n e m e c a l p s i D . a ti l o L h ti w l e b a n n A f o e r u g if e h t
s a e l p k e e s o t s t n a w d i e h T . o g e r e p u s e h t d n a d i e h t n e e w t e
b ure through othe r
r e h t o e h t n O . l e b a n n A h ti w e c n e ir e p x e t s a p s ’t r e b m u H o t r a li m i s s e it i v it c a l a u x e s
