1 THE RELATIONSHIP OF LEADERSHIP STYLE AND FOLLOWERSHIP
STYLE (CASE: ANDALAS UNIVERSITY)
THESIS
Thesis is Submitted as Partial of the Requirement for a Bachelor Degree in
Management Department – Faculty of Economics
Submitted By:
ASNI WAHYU SAFITRI
1010524020
INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
ECONOMICS FACULTY
ANDALAS UNIVERSITY
PADANG
3
Alumni’ Number at University: Asni Wahyu Safitri Alumni’ Number at Faculty:
a) Place/Date of Birth: Padang, Augustus 2, 1992
b) Parents’ Name: Drs Asfarizal MT c) Faculty: Economic
d)Major: Management International e) ID Number: 1010524020
f)Graduation Date: January 24, 2014
g)Grade: Very Satisfaction h)GPA: 3.27
i) Length of Study: 3 years 5 months j) Parents’ Address: Jati Parak Salai
no 4 RT 02/10 Jati Gaung Padang
THE RELATIONSHIP OF LEADERSHIP STYLE AND FOLLOWERSHIP STYLE (CASE: ANDALAS UNIVERSITY)
Bachelor Thesis by: Asni Wahyu Safitri Supervisor: Dr. Rahmi Fahmi SE, MBA
Abstract
The research has the purpose to analyze about the relationship of leadership style of Hersey-Blanchard situational theory to the followership style with two dimensions of independent thinking and active engagement. The research was conducted in the head office of Andalas University. The questionnaires was distributed to 135 employees using random sampling method with the sample is 110 respondents. The data analyzed using SPSS 16. The research found that leadership style has significant relationship to independent thinking but doesn’t have significant relations to active engagement. Moreover, the finding shows that the leadership styles of the leader in Andalas University are selling leader style meanwhile for the followership styles for both dimension of independent thinking and active engagement are pragmatist followership styles.
Keywords: Leadership styles Hersey-Blanchard situational theory, followership styles, active engagement, independent thinking.
This thesis has already examined and passed on January 24, 2014. This abstract has already approved by supervisor and examiners:
Signature 1 2 3
Name Dr. Rahmi Fahmi, SE. MBA Dr. Harif Amali Rivai, SE. M.si Asmi Abbas, SE. MM
Acknowledged,
Head of Management Department
Alumnus has already registered at Faculty/University and gets Alumnus’ Number:
Staff of Faculty/University
Alumni’ Number At Faculty Name Signature
Alumni’ Number At University Name Signature
Dr. Vera Pujani, SE. MM. Tech Nip. 196611162000032001
13 CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1Background of the Research
The development of organization will not loose from the role of the leader in that organization. Good leader is the people who can bring a good movement to the positive effect. Currently known that the development of one organization is not only determined based on the successnes of managing the financial budgeting but also because of the greatnes of managing its human resource management (Jiang, 2010). Organization was successful because they had the knack of hiring the right people for the right jobs and motivating, appraising, and developing them (Griffin, 2005). In the other hand, the leader will always need good follower who
can give better contribution for the organization. As we know that there’s will no
leader if there’s no followers because both of them are those who has an important role to develop and to achieve the organization goals.
Success or failure of organizations, including educational institutions, is a result of both the leaders and followers’ roles (Avolio & Reichard, 2008).
Research shows that followers’ role though not recognized as much as leaders’,
account for eighty percent of an organization’s success (Kelley, 1992). As such the role of followers can no longer be ignored especially with the realization that followers actually get the job done (Kelley, 1992).
14 (Shondrick & Lord, 2010). However, leadership and followership co-exist, there can be no leaders if there are no followers (Kelley, 2008) yet the acceptance of followership as an important effect to leadership is fairly recent (Bennis, 2008).
Dixon and Westbrook’s (2003) findings validated Kelley’s idea of the existence
of followership in all organizational levels. It is believed that a focus on followership will enhance our understanding of the leadership process because the operation of each is dependent on the other (Henry, 2012).
Banutu-Gomez (2004) maintains that in order for leaders to succeed they must teach their followers how to lead and how to be good followers. This is important because leaders and followers are interdependent (Henry, 2012); the role of the latter influences the former. It is therefore necessary to promote good followership behavior in order to achieve educational goals.
Today’s leaders need to know new knowledge, abilities and skills to
effectively cope with the constant organizational changes. The most significant function of an institution of higher learning (IHL) relies on its leadership effectiveness in creating a pleasant teaching environment for faculty and in providing students with quality of education they deserve (Afnan Al-Shuaiby, 2009). Blair (2000) stated that institutions of higher learning are increasingly expecting a Dean to attain external funding to be considered as an effective leader
whilst in a recent study it is indicated that “only a few studies have asked senior
15 The leadership way from a leader will always has a relation with the style of leadership itself. Leadership style refers to leaders’ actions or behaviors where they may use their formal authorities to establish work groups and affect them to support organizational strategy and goals (Bryman, 1992; Jong & Hartog, 2007; Robbin & Coulter, 2002). Leadership as leaders inducing followers to act for certain goals that represent the values and the motivations, the wants and needs, the aspirations and expectations of both leaders and followers (Shadare, 2009). Each leader has a different leadership style, style of leadership means influencing
the way leader’s subordinates to be able doing working activity in order to
achieve organizational goals (Ogbonna, 2000). The uses of leadership styles itself can be suitable based on the situation in what are the style that most appropriate to use. For this case, the leadership style which try to analyze is situational leadership styel or mostly known as Hersey-Blanchard theory.
Situational leadership style is based on the interaction among the dimensions of relationship behavior and task behavior, as well as follower readiness or maturity for performing a certain task (Hersey and Blanchard, 1996). Northouse (2001) noted that the situational leadership examines how leaders can become effective in many different types of organizational settings involving a wide variety of organizational tasks. Further, directive behavior involves clearly telling people what to do, how to do it, where to do it, and when to do it, and then loosely supervising their performance. The key point of situational leadership
16
relationship behavior and less on task behavior. When a group member becomes
very ready, a minimum of task or relationship behavior is required of the leader.
The successfull of organization growth cant be deny with the leadership factor which has by the leader and also a good work from its subordinats or the followers. Leader’s behaviours might enhance follower organizational identification, they do not examine the extent to which or leaders identify with the organization. Thus, social identity perspectives of leadership have focused almost entirely on the influence processes by which leaders increase follower self-efficacy, commitment and performance. (As Citied in Christianah Oyutenji; Rolf Van Dick1, 2011). Followership is important in the discussion of leadership for several reasons. Without followers there are no leaders. Organizing into
hierarchies is a natural phenomenon in both the human and animal kingdoms.
Researchers studying wolves, chimpanzees, and even chickens have long known
that social pecking order promotes the welfare of the group because some
individuals act as leaders and others as followers (Daft, 2005).
Leadership and followership are fundamental roles that individuals shift
into and out of under various conditions. Everyone is a follower at one time or
another. Indeed, most individuals, even those in positions of authority, have some
kind of boss or supervisor. Individuals are more often followers than leaders
(Daft, 2005). Followership may be defined as the ability to effectively follow the
directives and support the efforts of a leader to maximize a structured
organization. However, the term “followership” is often linked to negative and
17 Comcast Spotlight, 2006). As Citied in Jui Chen-Chen; Meindl (2004),
management and organizational behavior have been dominated by the concept of
leadership, which has assumed a romanticized, larger than life role as a result.
Hashim (2012) advanced that active followership means the leader’s authority has
been accepted which gives legitimacy to the direction and vision of the leader.
Without the eyes, ears, minds, and hearts of followers, leaders cannot function
effectively.
Andalas University is one of popular university in Indonesia which located in
Padang. It is mention that Andalas University had already become the top ten
university in Indonesia where is build more image this university. In the
institution like Andalas University which has an intention to be a world class
university may take a look that it is important for this institution to has a good
corporation between leaders and it follower in both university and faculty level.
He leaders need to direct their follower well and followers also need to make a
good participate in order to make a better birocration and standarization in
Andalas University. With this reason, the researcher is interested to conduct more
about the Leadership and Followership style in Andalas University.
So, based on the case background above, we can see that ability and skill of having good leadership style is very crucial for the job performance of employee or the followers. Because of that, the author is very interested to raise this issue
and do research for her scientific work with a title of “The Relationship Between
18 1.2Problem Statements
From the case background which already explain, the author can purpose the problem statement as follow:
How the ledership styles of Hersey-Blanchard has a relationship to the readiness to followership styles?
How the integration model of Leader Style and Follower Style has significant compatibility?
1.3Objectives of the Research
The purposes of study which want to offer by the researcher are:
1. To find out and analyze the leadership styles of leaders in Andalas University
2. To find out and analyze the followership styles in Andalas University 3. To find out and analyze the relationship between leadership and
followership styles in Andalas University
4. To find out and analize how the leaders find the best corporation with his followers with the appropriate approach, and also on the opposite one.
1.4Contributions of the Research 1. For Author
19 performance of leadership in the organization about leadership styles and followers.
2. For Andalas University Leaders
This research can be useful to help the leaders in Andalas University become an effective and able to develop their strategy in arrange their followers optimally.
3. For Andalas University Employees
This research is expected to be useful to increase their ability so they can be an effective followers.
1.5Scope of The Research
This research has a limited scope of analyzes in terms of numbers of variables
and object of the research. The variables will be tested in this research are limited
into: leadership style and followership style. The researcher limits the research
context by focusing to the head office employee at Andalas University.
1.6Outline of Research
This thesis is prepared using the following systematic: CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION
Contains background and formulation of the problem, the objectives to be achieved, the benefits of the research, and writing systematic thesis is used.
20 Contains theories include previous research, understanding about leadership style and followership style in reference supporting and related issues presented, review past research and the research hypothesis.
CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
The chapter raised about frame of mind, population, samples, and sampling, the operational definition of variables, sources and types of data and techniques of data collection, and data analysis techniques used.
CHAPTER IV RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
This chapter contains an overview about the object of study, history establishment of the company, organizational structure, and the process of data analysis and discussion.
CHAPTER V CONCLUSION
Writing will conclude the issues discussed based analysis that has been carried out, with suggestion as input for the continuation and development of the personality.
