This research was conducted by an English teacher of MA MA'ARIF 14 Bumi Nabung Central Lampung. This bachelor's thesis is entitled "TO IMPROVE SPEAKING PERFORMANCE USING CAROUSEL STRATEGY AMONG THE TENTH GRADER OF MA MA'ARIF 14 BUMI NABUNG CENTRAL LAMPUNG".
INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION
Background of Study
Speaking performance among tenth graders at MA Ma'arif 14 Bumi Nabung Ilir Central lampung. Therefore, it can be concluded that the speaking ability of students of the tenth grade MA Ma'arif 14 Bumi Nabung is not satisfied.
Problem Identification
Based on the illustration above, students' speaking problems in MA ten Ma'arif 14 Bumi Nabung should be addressed by the proper implementation of teaching strategy. The researcher tried to improve students' speaking about MA Ma'arif 14 Bumi Nabung, by applying the Carousel strategy; therefore, the researcher conducted a classroom research study entitled “Improving speaking performance using the carousel strategy among the tenth grade students of MA Ma‟arif 14 Bumi Nabung Central Lampung”.
Problem Limitation
Problem Formulation
Objective and Benefit of Research 1. The objectives of this research
- The Benefit of this research : a. For the Students
This strategy as a consideration for the principal to find out how fast students learn especially in speaking performance and evaluated together after the author did her research.
Prior Research
The difference in this research and the other previous research lies in the Class Room Action Research sample research. 2Rofika Tiara Avisteva. The effect of using carousel activity on students' speaking performance of descriptive text.(Jakarta:UIN Syarif Hidayatullah, 2016) p.18.
The Concept of Speaking Performance 1. The concept of Speaking
- The Concept of Speaking Performance a. The Definition of Speaking Performance
Based on rationalization, the researcher concludes that there are several variations of speech performance in the room. In order to help students overcome difficulties in learning to speak, teachers need to identify the factors that influence their speaking performance.
The Concept of Carousel Strategy 1. The Definition of Carousel Strategy
- Advantages of carousel strategy
- Disadvantages of carousel strategy
From the above definition, the researcher concludes that the carousel strategy is an activity where students like to spin the carousel around the classroom and perform various tasks related to the known vocabulary. Carousel strategy process in the classroom. The procedure for the carousel is:18 The procedure for the carousel is:18. Dozens of ideas and suggestions or problems and obstacles can be listed in a few minutes.
If the leader or teacher is not well versed in the principles of the technique, it can be difficult to engage students in learning and produce creative ideas. If students do not have sufficient prior knowledge about the problem, it can be difficult to come up with ideas and solutions.
Action Hypothesis
Participants feel a greater kinship to their product as they take ownership of their pool of ideas and suggestions.
Variable and Definition Operational Variable 1. Variables of Research
- Operational Definition of Variable
Also called treatment, the independent variable of this research is the carousel strategy, which is defined as the teaching strategy used by the teacher in the teaching process. Furthermore, based on the above explanation, in this research the researcher used the carousel strategy to conduct a treatment for the tenth grade students of MA MA‟ARIF 14 Bumi Nabung Cental Lampung. According to Evelyn Hatch, the dependent variable is the main variable that was measured in the research.
Dependent variable is a variable that can be improved with an independent variable.23 The dependent variable in this research is students' speaking performance, which focuses on students' abilities. The instrument for speaking test is oral test by asking students to perform English dialogue.
Research Location
Subject and Object of Study
While the purpose of this research is the students speaking performance at class tenth MA'ARIF 14 Bumi Nabung Ilir. Samsul Arifin, S.Pd as the collaborator in this research that the function is as the controller in the teaching learning process.
Action Plan
- Cycle 2
The researcher would like to divide the research into two cycles in the classroom action research. Classroom action research (CAR) has several models, but in this research the researcher used O‟Leary research design. The researcher makes a plan, how to stimulate the students through the technique and base the cycle.
In classroom action research, the researcher would like to have a gap in the research in two cycles. In the third phase, the researcher observes the students' activity, their participation and notes the learning process.
Data Collection Technique
- Test
- Observation
- The Field Note
After comparing the distribution of pre-test and post-test scores, the researcher reflects on the teacher's perspective and performance whether it is positive or negative. The researcher gives a speaking topic to be created in pairs by describing something like a friend of his bench. After the treatment, know the impact of the technique if it is able to improve the student's speaking performance.
To know the student's speaking performance, the researcher uses in the form of questions. In this current researcher, the researcher also uses documentation to know all data from the students of MA MA'ARIF 14 Bumi Nabung Central Lampung.
Data Analysis Technique
Indicator of Success
- Description of Research Location
- Mission of School
- Description of the Research Data
On the basis of the collected documents, it was found that Madrasah Aliyah (MA) 14 Bumi Nabung Central Lampung was established in 2004. Source: Documentation of the Number of Students at MA Ma'arif 14 bumi nabung in the academic year 2018/2019. Source: The result grade of Speaking pre-test at XI class of MA MA'ARIF 14 Bumi Nabung.
Source: The result grade of Speaking pre-test at X class of MA MA‟ARIF 14 Bumi Nabung. The successful students were those who achieved the minimum mastery criteria of English subject at MA MA‟ARIF 14 Bumi Nabung at least 70.
Acting
At this stage, the classroom situation was effective because the collaborator handed over to the researcher to ensure the effectiveness of the students before the researcher did research in the classroom. She indicated that most students gave their full attention to the researcher when it came time to study. The researcher started the lesson by praying, greeting, checking the attendance list and asking about the condition of the students.
Then, at the end of this meeting, the researcher gave posttest 1 performed in cycle I with similar task on pre-test before. That kind of test was a speaking test that asked students to describe the "National Monument". The result of the students' test in posttest 1 was better than test in pre-test before.
Post-test 1
Source: The result grade of speaking Post-test I at X class of MA MA‟ARIF 14 Bumi Nabung 1 November 05th 2019. Based on the result above, it could be seen that 11 students (42%) got grade up to the standard and 15 students (58%) got grade below the standard. The criterion of students who were successful in mastering the material must get minimum mastery criteria, at least 70.
The students who were active in discussion would get the mark by marking it on the observation sheet for meeting 1 and meeting 2. Source: The students' activity at the eleventh grade X class of MA MA‟ARIF 14 Bumi Nabung.
The Student's activity
Reflecting
From the observation of the results in the learning process in cycle I, it has been established that the Minimum Mastery Criterion (MMC) which is 70 of the research has not yet been reached in the learning process. At the end of this cycle, the researcher analyzed and calculated all the processes as students' pre-test grade and students' post-test grade I score.
Deviation Explanation
Planning
The researcher and collaborator prepared the lesson plan, observation sheet of the students' activities, identified the problem and found the causes of problem at the first and the last of learning activities. The researcher also planned to give evaluation to measure the students' mastery on the given material. The researcher started greeting the lesson, prayed, checked the attendance list and asked the students' condition.
The researcher asked the students to activate the students to achieve the discussion of "Prambanan Temple" by asking themselves the question: "what is it about?". This meeting posted test II at the end of cycle II, for 2x45 minutes after the students did the action.
Observing
Source: The result of the speaking skills after test II in class X of MA MA‟ARIF 14 Bumi Nabung. Based on the above result, it can be concluded that 20 students (77%) were successful and 6 other students (23%) were not successful.
Post-test 2
Based on the results of the observation sheet in II. cycle, the researcher stated that the learning process in II. Source: Speech performance by students in the tenth grade of MA MA‟ARIF 14 Bumi Nabung.
Learning activities
INTERPRETATION
- Result of Students Learning
- The Result of Students’ Learning Activities in Cycle I and Cycle II The students‟ learning activities data was gotten from the
The researcher offered the post-test II to measure the students' ability after the implementation of the treatment. This indicated that the students' speaking performance was improved. c. Comparison of grade in pre-test, post-test I in cycle I, and post-test II in cycle II. Based on the results of the pre-test, post-test I and post-test II, it was known that there was a positive significant increase in the students' grade.
Comparison of the student's pre-exam, post-exam I class in cycle I and post-exam II. class in II. Comparative assessment of students' speaking performance in the pre-exam, after exam I in cycle I and after exam II in cycle I.
DISCUSSION
Based on the results of the pre-survey, we can conclude that there was an improvement in the average grade and the total score of students who successfully passed the test from the pre-test, post-test I to post-test II. In addition, in the post-test I there were 11 students or (42%) who passed the test, the indicator students get a score > 70 with an average score of 70. Meanwhile, in the post-test II there were 20 students or (77%) who passed the test indicator students get a grade>70 with an average of 77.
It is inferred that there is improvement on the students' complete grade and total grade of the students who passed the least from pre-test, post-test I to post-test II. From the explanation, the researcher comes to the conclusion that the research is successful and it can be stopped in cycle II because the success indicator 75% of students got a degree.
Conclusion
The teacher must prepare and select appropriate strategy and materials to produce the effective teaching learning process. It is better for the teacher to use Carousel strategy in English learning, especially in Speaking Performance. The teacher to give motivation for the students to be more active in the learning process.
It is suggested to the students to be more active in the learning process in the class and improve their speaking performance so that they can be successful in learning English. To support the principal in order to support the English learning process by preparing the facilities for teaching and learning completely.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
APPENDICES
The researcher gives pretest to the student Ma Ma'arif 14 Bumi Nabung Central Lampung. Speech performance of the student Ma Ma'arif 14 Bumi Nabung Central Lampung in post Test I. Speech performance of the student Ma Ma'arif 14 Bumi Nabung Central Lampung in post Test II.
Speaking performance of student Ma Ma‟arif 14 Bumi Nabung Central Lampung in post test.
