ﻠﺠﻣ هﮋﻳو ﺖﺒﻗاﺮﻣ يرﺎﺘﺳﺮﭘ ﻪ
هرود 2 هرﺎﻤﺷ ، 2 ، نﺎﺘﺴﺑﺎﺗ 1388
تﺎﺤﻔﺻ : 67 ﺎﺗ 70
لﻮﺌﺴﻣ هﺪﻨﺴﻳﻮﻧ :
لﻮﺘﺑ ﺮﻳﺮﺤﻧ . ﺖﺳاﻮﺧرد مﺎﻤﺗ ﻲﻧﺎﺸﻧ ﻪﺑ ﺪﻳﺎﺑ ﺎﻫ
[email protected] ﺪﻧﻮﺷ هدﺎﺘﺳﺮﻓ
.
ﻪﻟﺎﻘﻣ ﺖﻓﺎﻳرد :
2 / 7 / 88 ﻪﻟﺎﻘﻣ شﺮﻳﺬﭘ :
28 / 7 / 88
* MSc !
"
MSc
#$
"
MSc
% &%
"' PhD
% ()
"'
MSc
* '
#$
"+,
MSc
*
)...
(
!" !#$
%
)...
(
!" !#$
-./
0 1 : !&
!' ()&
*+ ,* -$
.*
"*
/ 0 123 4&
!5 6 *
& 7 *8& *9 :;-9
; .
& .* * <"& =>$ ?@ >5A& ="
12
*+ !" B
*
"*
/
/ C"D 7 6 ;/ <09 ;
.
0 : >5A&
0E$
F G$
HIJ ' ()&
'
*+ ,*
+ !& <G$
.* / K"
"* @
"
12
' .*
-)& ; !' <85 / ?@
K"
/
!'
@
!#$ # L MN
. BOL )1LP& LD
-&4L
Q #-$ ;/ <0+ &
' @ R'K$
.
@ &S !&/S * R8&T
*:7&
+ RG$ * "7$
.
+3 0 : !& <G$ !' ;/ <09 ' =&
12 .*
TU / W UX± / HY
* *;
"*
TW / Z WI± / TW . &S !&/S T
->& ?(4 R8&
! * =" = )
JU / J p<
(.
+4 ' : & .*
12 B
*+ !"
-"@ * < $ !' -[ @ MA& .* &
$
<
. -&/ =" "
@;S & @
$ /\ ]" * ^&
_-&
;6 S !
"S `@6 .
-56 0 : 12 *9 ,* ' ;/ <09
B "* 4& *9 ,*
Quality of life of coronary artery disease patients treated with drug and surgical methods
Nehrir B.* MSc, Rahmani R.1MSc, Sadeghi M.1MSc, Ebadi A.1PhD, Babatabar Darzi H.1MSc, Sadeghi Shermeh M.1MSc
٭Faculty of Nursing, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
1Faculty of Nursing, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Aims: Coronary artery disease patients cure by three different medical methods includes drug, nonsurgical intervention using balloon catheter and graft-way for blocked artery. This study was to evaluate the advantage of two CABS (Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery) and drug methods by measuring quality of life of people undergone those treatments.
Methods: In a descriptive-analytical study, 190 coronary artery disease patients treated with drug or surgery methods were selected by purposeful sampling method from the list of one of the Tehran hospital's patients. Then, during a structured interview, Nottingham quality of life questionnaire was completed for each patient. Data was analyzed by independent T test and χ2.
Results: The mean score for quality of life in patients treated with surgical and drug methods were 18.56±3.25 and 23.39±4.23, respectively. Independent T-test showed a significant difference between the two methods (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Although CABS treatment is more difficult and cost more, but it is more appropriate.
Informing people about this method should be more to provide comprehensive facilities and conditions necessary to apply it.
Keywords: Quality of Life, Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery, Drug Intervention
ﻠﺠﻣ ﺖﺒﻗاﺮﻣ يرﺎﺘﺳﺮﭘ ﻪ هﮋﻳو
هرود
2 هرﺎﻤﺷ ، 2 ، نﺎﺘﺴﺑﺎﺗ 1388
68
! (CAD)
. #$% &' ()
*
+,- $. ' +- /00
1 + 2 3
$4
] 6 [.
+ 89 ) :
*
;<
% > ?
+- +,- .
*!
+- +,-
@A
+ ]
; .[
B !1 C D +
ECAD
* +F
D4
#$
:D ( +,- .
;G
%
! :D 6G
% D H !
?F 4I CAD
H !
!4 #$ +- JK ,8 K ]
L [.
E
D() K M4
B4
D N9
!) #OF P- +,- ( Q- +
BR E1
B, ]
S [.
! T CAD
+ &U N
. T +,R + D
V@ * *WF, *O $X + ) *
*+)
&
W * K$X *
VY4
!C +Z #$44
+ #3
. K[ ) \ + ] T
!) \ +
* $ ^ ! ! K
$ _ 4 +
.
$
!F
`4 ?%
a
$@
#$
+ $
N $ *!F !
*$M $@ D ]K bc stent
- !) +
N ] / .[
T
$@ \ $ K +.9
#$
(CABS) *
D bK
4 d49 !D
*
! ?%
`4 a
$@
#$
( $ K # *+ @K ! $ D +
+ M JN4 +
. *C) T
+.9 P-
] G [.
# D W eA FC @ +
$@ Q 9 * C $ * \
C Y +(1K V f9 *!
9 !) D
$ . eA
+ *+18M *+ggA & ( ^ + T F + X * &$ * W1K *+
.
- D ^
*D )
K $4
+ % JN h
+ - i !@ !Z $4
% 2$ R
h +N$ D 3 * + N N j i $
9
j +D ]
k .[
+,R + T
*
# 41 l # *+98m
^ +n 1
* - T % ! o
+ N
$ . 41K +98 T CABS
* &Fp
ep + i) # ! ! +N$ D 3
X D T % 8
C ]
q [.
+N$ D 3
+ $ + fp j !4 M !4
D +$8 &Y.
X D +4r s
. + ? +N$ D 3 D +A 3 (
*+@9 + + *+9 & 3 9 *EO *+N$ D D X h
D
#m ] G .[
+ ! &Fp 4D ! $
@O tA
+( +9 +3R *+@9 ! D ?,- ^ D 3 $4C 8 ) +N$
+ j TC
. 9
! + D +N$ D 3 283 *CAD
&( ?F
!) ! D $ ?,- +3 V8 @ $4@
]
<
[.
!@F
Fp 3 p u$
! ND + +N$ D ! D $ CAD
CABS
@3- 9
@3- $ T1N $ 2M 4 4
b( p +N$ D 3 + ]
60 [.
4 F Fp !(
<6 , !D 6q<
,
<<0 CAD VF !D EK D #3 B4 #N !4
, ! D +N$ D 3 $ vA NHP ! D CAD
, KCAD
. , ! D +N$ D 3 D CAD
tX C 9 VF !@( +4 #N ! D ,@
D $4@
, ! +9 1 +3R E4 *CAD
*!$ ] Y WN &gA p +N$ D $4C M +N@ *g- X ]
66 [.
! ) !1D E1 9 CAD
! 9
# 1 Q4 + +
w 2$ B D W
T + +CAD
!9$ +N$ D 3 ,8 $
8 ) X x
$ 2M X. E[K *$ i .
Q D E[K !D BR +
(historical cohort)
!, D #N !) %CAD
! D +(
+,R + T
9 CABS
) +p- vA *CAD
c ?-$. !$
G ! D #
\ T D W *
k0 a L/
B ] 9 2$
D m Fp !D CAD
$4 1j (
* 1
+. &( $@
( $ $ Fp ?-$.
&$
G
$4N - @O + +N$ D 3 Y D # .
6<0 vC @ D #$
W ! !8 8
Fp ^ D. &U T
+gm N
eA $ $ X P@ Fp u$ fX D bK * N)
#N
</
3 - N
# $4 ,.g #$ T
9 )
$ . D +N$ D 3 +(1K *WN &R
WZ EA vC TJK *+(1K #$ K {R @F
ﻲﺣاﺮﺟ و ﻲﻳوراد شور ﺎﺑ نﺎﻣرد ﺖﺤﺗ ﺮﻧوﺮﻛ قوﺮﻋ نارﺎﻤﻴﺑ ﻲﮔﺪﻧز ﺖﻴﻔﻴﻛ
ﺮﻳﺮﺤﻧ
نارﺎﻜﻤﻫ و
69
{O%
9 + C )
$
$ .
# 3 >
K $. +N$ D EK D #3 E[
+N$ D 3
9 28]4
$ ) . 1 Lq
w +N$ D 3 B
G | + - + $
$ .
| } $ L
| *#
$ q *#
| E4 $ +3R
<
| *#
eC $ /
| *#
$ 1 +9
/
| # +@9 s% $ q
# D QM Lq # H
?(
+
$ . 3 9$ D &( +4 # P@
$ +N$ D .
EK B NHP
6<k/
28]4 #] !@]
+.R + +9 #N$ $ .
!) + ,
@]
! B D 6<kq 6<q6 V $ #$M4 !4
R
K #@N
+ . !D 8 w
&'
EK ~ #$
`4 1 ,
$ . E) !4 &3 &OO% +R *!$ !N *+
.9 ! * ! D + Y D +,- ! +]@( *+
N - ED) , .
$M !D) 2M +K Y D
) qk / 0 = (r
$ $h ] 6;
[ . 2 E[K l 1
SPSS 11
!D) ) JM T
N - + .
T +4 #N ]
*+.9
;<
/
± q 6S / /G +,R #N
0qS /
±60 6<
/ /G ?O@ ) !D) 4 &3 T
+
$ ! 8 ) )
0/
/ 0 p>
.(
#N CABS
;G
% !D kS
%
+,R #N L
/ /<
% k / S0
%
$ !D . ) !D) JM
4 &3 +
$ ! 8 ) .
vC D( 1
: #N +]D)
±] u%
±] u%
6/
/
±LL 6k / 66/
6k/
/
±/;
k / 6;G
! S<
/
±LG /G / 6q6 6SL /
±/G qk /
;0;
" # $%&'()%*
$% ( *+*
q0;
/
±LL qG / 66G S6 /
±Lk G / 6SL
" # $%&'()%*
" *+*
0k;
/
±<
k<
/ L<
/66 /
±<
/;
/ L;
,'
% - qk<
/
±G0 /<
/ 6;6
;0G /
±Lq 6L / 66G
G / L<
% ) o
(
$ p &g%
.
+,R #N +]D) CABS
B$9 6 #$N .
] D E +,R #N ? +]D)
+.9 #N .
) !D) 4 &3 ?O@ T
+
$ ! #N +]D) )
0/
/ 0 p>
.(
X. E[K 9
#N ! CABS
! @O
?O@ ) !D) +,R #N )T
0/
/ 0 p<
( 8 +N$ D 3
$ . #N CABS +N$ D 3 eC $ 19
,@ # ] +,R #N
$ ) B$9
; .(
.
] @O(
+@ & D #$) NHP
←
-" /%0%! 1#
↓
"2 3T
± SD M
± SD 4 fp M
+
4 56'
;kG /
±6 kS / S //L /
±6 GS / / 006 / 0
7 4 8#
;/6 /
±6 SG /
; /00 /
±6
;0 / L 006 / 0
9
;qL /
±6 /L /
; 66<
/
±6
<</
/ L 006 / 0
0: 7 ;!
L0<
/
±6 Lq / / 66S /
±;
;;
/ G 00S / 0
LGG
/
±6 S/
/ S kS6 /
±6
<S / / 006 / 0
,<
q6;
/
±0 //
/ 6 qSk /
±0 S6 /
; 006 / 0
/%0%! =4 3!
-"
;//
/
±L /G / 6q
;LG /
±S L<
/
;L 0/
/ 0 0<
b ! B gC !D !Z {O% *
{O%
*# eA +g ?(
+ Y $
#$N 1 ! B ?U .
D + j
uNF !D) a
u c )
(ks 0/
/ 0 p>
! B
$ + j .
>6#
l :
+ vA #$) !,
CAD
J
$4@
. Fp 4 F
] 6L
$ K [*
] L [
#A 1 ] / [ Op .
+,R #N +4 ] )
6<
/ /G
B ( ] #N D
Fp 4 F
] 6L
$ K [*
] L [
#A 1 ] / [ Fp $ Op +
V + C
] 6S .[
+ bK 3N ! X. Fp
@ T
+,R +
$ .
?g% CAD 1 #
+
,@
+' .
*!C +Z p +,R #N wKcF
!C $4-
#N D CABS O
!
$ . 9
ED) $O ! +,Rm >
* !C $4-
K +F(F !D wKcF
*B@
+ ! 3N
V8 #N pC ?
D() +$cFc +4 CAD
&Fp $4@ 9
#A 1 ] / + ?(4 [*
] 6/
+ [ ] 6S [ Op .
V} D ! 8
F $U +Jm V
+Z !$
3 Q,
$44 # .
( ,8 +D VY4 \Z ! !D E + U P-
. +N$ D W, +,- + D x
i
W@ ?$ # $ 1
] 6L .[
ﻠﺠﻣ ﺖﺒﻗاﺮﻣ يرﺎﺘﺳﺮﭘ ﻪ هﮋﻳو
هرود
2 هرﺎﻤﺷ ، 2 ، نﺎﺘﺴﺑﺎﺗ 1388
70
+N$ D 3 # ]
*
! R B$9
;
+ #$
! D +,R #N ! @O CABS
&( +,R #N $ C 8 +N$ D 3 Fp M $4@
4 F Op
.
+ 8
@O +,R #N !1 Y DCABS
+@9 s% }
* K +N$ D 3 D
$ C
] 6L .[
Fp ^ K
l 1 $ 2M !$4F
+8 + T $ vA $)
ih CABS
! 8 ) - ! +N$ D 3 +,o
# + $ ] S .[
# ] +,R #N
)
<S / / (
#N CABS ) S/
/ S (
4 uC +
$ ) 006 / 0
= (p R +,R #N
#N ,@
+ MCABS
$44
&Fp l
] 6G [ F$
+ ] 6k [ Op .
T ! Q P4 +
D 9
! ! &( l ! V u$ CAD
h
*#
*E) X
!@ $4 V8
+(1K 2 ?U .
T D W
*+
% !@ +N$ D 3 h
- i +
$ . ! +,R T
! O CAD
tX l +.9 T @ D *
V +3A T
& * !Z *
W #m O $X * + #
84
+ +. ( *$4@ +, 9 eC *} $4
$ J] i !@ +3R &'.
. +) D +,R ! T
T D 2D' ^ N Y $ C C$
N #8 +p- ! Y4 .
?%
,%-
T M D +C4 $ ! !(1K +
! X CAD
+ +,4 + T *$ )
$44 eA .
T E[K l 9 CABS
+ 84K *+,R T + &Fp 2M
+ T 1 +8 $h &U 4D Y D CABS
!9$ T *+,R T +N$ D 3
+ .
+8$
41 + T N
! $8 !F D T + 9 $4D R +F &( ?.
.
@#
1- Beagleho L. Cardiovascular disease in developing countries.
BMJ. 1992;86(3):1008-9.
2- Poornajee B. [Internet] Coronary heart diseases in Iran marginal notes. [Cited 2009] Available from:
http://www.hamshahrionline.ir/News/?id=5136.
3- Punder R. Nursing the surgical patient. London: Bailer Tindal; 2003.
4- Sorrention S. Nursing assistants. 5th ed. New York: Elsevier;
2000.
5- Yazdankhahfard M. Nursing care of PCI. Tehran: Salemi publication; 2001. [Persian]
6- Jamieson M. Factors influencing health related quality of life in cardiac rehabilitation patient. Prog Cardiovasc Nurs.
2002;17(3):124-31.
7- Rahmani R. Cardiac care in CCU. Tehran: Taimoorzadeh Publication; 2001. [Persian]
8- Aaranson D. Quality of life one year following bone marrow transplantation. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2001;28(9):127-31.
9- Munafo M, Trim J. Chronic pain. Toronto: Heinemann;
2000.
10- Karlsson A, Rasmussen C. Chest pain after coronary artery bypass relation to coping and quality of life. Cardio vascular J.
2002;36(1):41-7.
11- Lukarninen H. Assessment of quality of life with the nattinghom health profile among women with coronary artery disease. Heart Lung. 1998;27(3);189-99.
12- Prieto L. NHP. J Epidemiol Community Health.
2001;54(7):212-8.
13- Lukarninen H. Quality of life in coronary artery disease.
Nurs Res. 1998;74(6):337-43.
14- Lavie CJ, Milani RV. Disparate effects of improving aerobic exercise capacity and quality of life after cardiac rehabilitation in young and elderly coronary patients. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2000;20(4):235-40.
15- Feinkelmeier B. Cardiothoracic surgical nursing. 2nd ed.
England: Cambridge; 2000.
16- Hunt J. Quality of life 12 month after coronary bypass graft surgery. Heart Lung. 2000;24(6):401-10.
17- Ridley S. Outcomes critical care. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann; 2002.
