• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Directory UMM :Data Elmu:jurnal:J-a:Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology:Vol253.Issue1.Oct2000:

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Directory UMM :Data Elmu:jurnal:J-a:Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology:Vol253.Issue1.Oct2000:"

Copied!
13
0
0

Teks penuh

Loading

Gambar

Fig. 1. Sketch of the competition treatments. In five of them, the studied species was Hthe target individual (filled symbol) was estimated under the densities given in the figure (
Table 1Result of the ANOVA based on data transformed with ln(
Fig. 2. Interaction term Species3Competition. Average growth (ln(growth11) of target snails, with standarderror bars indicated, is shown for different treatments
Fig. 3. Linear regressions of growth of HFilled symbols show growth with intraspecific competition and open symbols growth with interspecificcompetition

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Externae developed on three reared crabs — one Swedish and two Australian C. maenas — approximately 12 months after the experiments. Morphological examination of these and the

In experiment 5, 18 hermit crabs that had been evicted from their shell were given a choice between an intact periwinkle shell appropriate for a crab one-half of that crab’s wet

Pink shrimp consumption rate was similar in two habitat groups, the first was composed of soft-bottom substrates and macroalgae, and the second of small woody debris and low

2.4.2. This sub-population presented was comprised exclusive- ly of 2-year-old individuals. The purpose of the experiment was to determine whether and how the activity of the

Complexity and structural components affected the richness, total density, and the densities of two of the three most common gastropods in this mid-shore rocky intertidal

copepods consumed (Fig. The relationship between the number of copepods ingested and density was nonlinear. As few as seven copepods were detected; one shrimp ingested no copepods and

Most publications on mysid feeding rates report the factors (usually food density) affecting the clearance rates for filter feeding (on phytoplankton) or predatory feeding (on

We believe that the differences observed between this study and that of Crowder and Cooper (1982) exist because overexploitation of prey in the small density treatment, as seen