• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Planning

Dalam dokumen ISQAE 2016 Proceeding (Halaman 118-123)

The researcher prepares lesson plan, material (job vacancy, application letter sample), teaching aids (laptop, internet connection), and tests (pre test and post test).

The Implementation of the Action

On Tuesay, October 25th, 2016 the researcher told the students’previos material and the goal of the lesson.she told the students about the result of writing application letter before after giving them material about application letter. Then, she discussed with the students the solution to improve their writing through email. The teacher gave the students a worksheet to know the students’ writing especially about application letter which connected with the previous job vacancy. She gave the students 15 minutes to finish the pre test. After the test, she began to resend the sample of application letter which shorter but clearer. After that, the teacher and students discussed it. Then, the students gave the feedback. At the end of the activity, the teacher asked the students to write a new application letter with their own concept after undersanding all main point after cycle two.

Observation

In cycle II there are differences in acitivity than in cycle I. The students did the worksheet about application letter which connect to email. The result have significant difference between pre test and post test. The result table:

Number Name of Students Score of

Worksheet I

Score of Worksheet

II

1 Ameilia Zahra 75 90

2 Asimi 75 85

3 Bening Waloelani 75 85

4 Delima Putri 80 90

Enriching Quality and Providing Affordable Education through New Academia | 106

5 Dita Rola Sari 70 85

6 Edo Rohido 80 90

7 Ellisa 80 90

8 Faldi Mawaldi 80 95

9 Gunaiah 80 95

10 Herni Haryani 75 90

11 Hikmah Hidayanti 75 90

12 Ikka Marthiana 75 85

13 Irma Sulistia 80 90

14 Ita Rosita 80 90

15 Leni Yuniyar 75 90

16 Maesah 80 90

17 Marlina 80 90

18 Melinah 80 90

18 Muhammad Noh 80 90

20 Neneng Sulistianingsih 80 90

21 Nurasih 80 90

22 Pahrulroji 75 90

23 Rani Baeti Umami 70 80

24 Rara Shera Dewi P 85 95

25 Refina 85 95

26 Restianingsih 80 90

27 Rini 75 90

28 Rita Rachim 75 90

29 Santinah 75 85

30 Sinta 75 90

31 Siti Aisah 75 90

32 Siti Hernawati 70 80

33 Siti Junariyah 75 85

34 Siti Sinta Ayuningsih 75 90

35 Siti Surini 80 90

36 Sri Elmayanti 80 95

37 Sumanah 75 90

38 Sumiyati A 75 90

39 Vera Paramida 75 85

40 Winda Saputri 75 90

The researcher will calculate t test to know whether email can give significat differences between pre test and post test mean.

Calculate t0 value: The result of pre test and post test to get ÓD and ÓD2. The data for t-test calculation:

Number Name of Students

Score of Worksheet

I

Score of Worksheet

II Differences

1 Ameilia Zahra 75 90 15

2 Asimi 75 85 10

3 Bening Waloelani 75 85 10

4 Delima Putri 80 90 10

5 Dita Rola Sari 70 85 15

6 Edo Rohido 80 90 10

Enriching Quality and Providing Affordable Education through New Academia | 107

7 Ellisa 80 90 10

8 Faldi Mawaldi 80 95 15

9 Gunaiah 80 95 15

10 Herni Haryani 75 90 15

11 Hikmah Hidayanti 75 90 15

12 Ikka Marthiana 75 85 10

13 Irma Sulistia 80 90 10

14 Ita Rosita 80 90 10

15 Leni Yuniyar 75 90 15

16 Maesah 80 90 10

17 Marlina 80 90 10

18 Melinah 80 90 10

18 Muhammad Noh 80 90 10

20 Neneng Sulistianingsih 80 90 10

21 Nurasih 80 90 10

22 Pahrulroji 75 90 15

23 Rani Baeti Umami 70 80 10

24 Rara Shera Dewi P 85 95 10

25 Refina 85 95 10

26 Restianingsih 80 90 10

27 Rini 75 90 15

28 Rita Rachim 75 90 15

29 Santinah 75 85 10

30 Sinta 75 90 15

31 Siti Aisah 75 90 15

32 Siti Hernawati 70 80 10

33 Siti Junariyah 75 85 10

34 Siti Sinta Ayuningsih 75 90 15

35 Siti Surini 80 90 10

36 Sri Elmayanti 80 95 15

37 Sumanah 75 90 15

38 Sumiyati A 75 90 15

39 Vera Paramida 75 85 10

40 Winda Saputri 75 90 15

Median 3085 3570 485

Calculate standar deviation

=STDEV(E2:E41)/40

Standar Deviation 2,50

Calculate t0

T Value 3,03

Giving interpretation t0: Calculation of df (Degree of freedom):

df = n – 1= 40 – 1 = 39

Consult with t-table value with df = 39, the value of t with the degree of signification of á = 0,05, comparing t0 with tt. t0 = 3,03 is greater than tt with the á = 0,05. If t0 is same or greater than tt, so null hypothesis will be rejected.

T table with n = 39 is 2,02

3,03 > 2,02. T test calculation is greater than t table. So h0 is rejected. Therefore, there is a significant difference between pre test and post test.

Enriching Quality and Providing Affordable Education through New Academia | 108 The pre test is greater than the post test. It shows that email gives influence in improving student’s writing in application letter material.

Reflection

The researcher conclude that the students can improve their writing in application letter and they understand how to arrange it well.

Discussions

From the analysis of result in cycle I and cycle II, it shows that there is an improvement of students’ writing. The improvements are as follow:

The Cycle I Students’ Improvement

No Students’ Improvement Total Percentage

1 The students who are increase 35 87,50%

2 The students who are decrease 5 12,50%

The Cycle II Students’ Improvement

No Students’ Improvement Total Percentage

1 The students who are increase 40 100%

2 The students who are decrease 0 0%

Teaching application letter by using email get better achievement based on the data above.

The result of post test in cycle I and cycle II are greater than pre test. The writer concludes that email is effective to teach application letter because it can attract the students and motivate them to learn more.

Conclusions

Undoubtedly, the biggest change brought about by online education is that the cooperation between teachers and students is strengthened more (Greg, K. 2000: 4). We can draw a conclusion from based on the discussion above, it is concluded that the use of email is effective in teaching application letter and improving the students’ ability in it. The improvement can be clearly shown in the students’ writing score. The differences of the result between pre test and post test are significant. Furthermore, the result of t-test in writing cycle I is smaller and in cycle II is bigger than t-table with n = 39 is 2,02. If t table is same or grater than t-test calculation, so the null hypothesis (Ho) is rejected. (Ho) is rejected;

therefore there is significance difference between pre test and post test median. Finally, according to some statements above it is conclude that email is appropriate for 12th grade students of SMKN 3 Serang to improve their writing ability about application letter.

References

Benjamin, R. & Chun, M. (2003). A new field of dreams: The Collegiate Learning Assessment Project. Peer Review, 5(4), 26-29.

Brandt, D. (2005). Writing for a living: Literacy and the knowledge economy. Written Communication, 22, 166-197.

Donald, E.H., Michelle, G. & Simone, C. (2000). 147. Practical Tips for teaching online groups.

Wisconsin: ATWOOD PUBLISHING.

Geiser, S. & Studley, R. (2001). UC and the SAT: Predictive validity and differential impact of the SAT I and SAT II at the University of California. Retrieved March 1, 2002, from the University of California, Office of the President Web site:

http://www.ucop.edu/sas/research/researchandplanning/pdf/sat_study.pdf

Greg, K. (2000). Online education: learning and teaching in cyberspace. Belmont: Wadsworth.

http://smallbusiness.chron.com/use-email-business-communication-118.html

Enriching Quality and Providing Affordable Education through New Academia | 109

"Information Literacy in Vocational Education: A Course Model". White-Clouds.com. 2 Sep 2006.

Ken, W. W. & Jason, D. B. (2004). The student guide to successful online learning. Boston:

Pearson Education. Inc.

Kelm, O. (1995). E-mail discussion groups in foreign language education: Grammar follow-up.

In Mark W. (Ed.), Telecollaboration in foreign language learning: proceedings of the Hawaii Symposium (pp. 19-28). Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.

Mark W. (1995). E-mail for English teaching. Washington DC: TESOL.

Ron Brown, Fax invades the mail market, New Scientist, Vol. 56, No. 817. 1972: p.218–221.

Trochim, William M.K. (2006). Social Research Methods. New York: Research Methods Knowledge Base

Enriching Quality and Providing Affordable Education through New Academia | 110

LEARN WHILE CULTURED" AS CULTURE CONSERVATION EFFORTS

Dalam dokumen ISQAE 2016 Proceeding (Halaman 118-123)

Garis besar

Dokumen terkait