I
T
N
A
-
S
O
C
I
A
L
P
E
R
S
O
N
A
L
I
T
Y
D
I
S
O
R
D
E
R
O
F
T
H
E
M
A
I
N
N
I
R
E
T
C
A
R
A
H
C
P
A
T
R
I
C
K
S
Ü
S
K
I
N
D
’
S
R
E
R
E
D
R
U
M
A
F
O
Y
R
O
T
S
E
H
T
,
E
M
U
F
R
E
P
S I S E H T E T A U D A R G R E D N U N A
s t n e m e ri u q e R e h t f o t n e m ll if l u F l a it r a P s a d e t n e s e r P
f o e e r g e D e h t r o
f SarjanaSastra s
r e tt e L h s il g n E n i
y B
E M A
D KRISTANANAPITUPULU
: r e b m u N t n e d u t
S 084214071
E M M A R G O R P Y D U T S S R E T T E L H S I L G N E
S R E T T E L H S I L G N E F O T N E M T R A P E D
S R E T T E L F O Y T L U C A F
Y T I S R E V I N U A M R A H D A T A N A S
A T R A K A Y G O Y
i
I
T
N
A
-
S
O
C
I
A
L
P
E
R
S
O
N
A
L
I
T
Y
D
I
S
O
R
D
E
R
O
F
T
H
E
M
A
I
N
N
I
R
E
T
C
A
R
A
H
C
P
A
T
R
I
C
K
S
Ü
S
K
I
N
D
’
S
R
E
R
E
D
R
U
M
A
F
O
Y
R
O
T
S
E
H
T
,
E
M
U
F
R
E
P
S I S E H T E T A U D A R G R E D N U N A
s t n e m e ri u q e R e h t f o t n e m ll if l u F l a it r a P s a d e t n e s e r P
f o e e r g e D e h t r o
f SarjanaSastra s
r e tt e L h s il g n E n i
y B
E M A
D KRISTANANAPITUPULU
: r e b m u N t n e d u t
S 084214071
E M M A R G O R P Y D U T S S R E T T E L H S I L G N E
S R E T T E L H S I L G N E F O T N E M T R A P E D
S R E T T E L F O Y T L U C A F
Y T I S R E V I N U A M R A H D A T A N A S
A T R A K A Y G O Y
v i
H A I M L I A Y R A K I S A K I L B U P N A U J U T E S R E P N A A T A Y N R E P R A B M E L
S I M E D A K A N A G N I T N E P E K K U T N U
: a m r a h D a t a n a S s a ti s r e v i n U a w s i s a h a m a y a s ,i n i h a w a b i d n a g n a t a d n a t e b g n a Y
a m a
N :DameK irstanaNap tiupulu a
w s i s a h a M r o m o
N :084214071
, n a u h a t e g n e p u m li n a g n it n e p e k i m e
D saya membe irkan kepada Perpustakaan :l
u d u jr e b g n a y a y a s h a i m li a y r a k a m r a h D a t a n a S s a ti s r e v i n U
it n
A -s iosa lPersonaltiyDisorderoft heMa inCharacteri nPatrick’ sSüskind’s r
e r e d r u M a f o y r o t S e h T , e m u f r e P
n a k ir e b m e m a y a s n a i k i m e d n a g n e D . ) a d a a li b ( n a k u lr e p i d g n a y t a k g n a r e p a tr e s e B
m a l a d n a k h il a g n e m , n a p m i y n e m k u t n u k a h a m r a h D a t a n a S n a a k a t s u p r e P a d a p e k
n a k i s u b ir t s i d n e m , a t a d n a l a k g n a p k u t n e b m a l a d a y n a l o l e g n e m , n i a l a i d e m k u t n e b
b u p m e m n a d , s a t a b r e t a r a c e
s ilkasikannya d i Interne t atau media lain untuk n a k ir e b m e m n u p u a m a y a s i r a d n ij i a t n i m e m u lr e p a p n a t s i m e d a k a n a g n it n e p e k
it l a y o
r kepadas ayas elamat etapmencantumkannamas ayas ebaga ipenuil .s
. a y n r a n e b e s n a g n e d t a u b a y a s g n a y i n i n a a t a y n e p n a i k i m e D
i
Dbua td iYogyaka tra. :
l a g g n a t a d a
P 27September2012
, n a k a t a y n e m g n a Y
v
o
r
h
t
g
n
i
h
t
y
r
e
v
e
o
d
n
a
c
I
u
g
h
H
I
M
h
t
g
n
e
r
t
s
e
m
s
e
v
i
g
o
h
w
3
1:
4
s
n
a
i
p
p
i
l
i
h
P
g
n
i
n
n
i
W
i
s
E
a
r
n
i
n
g
,
L
o
s
i
n
g
i
s
L
e
a
r
n
i
n
g
)
s
u
o
m
y
n
o
n
A
(
r
o
e
r
u
t
n
e
v
d
a
g
n
i
r
a
d
a
r
e
h
t
i
e
s
i
e
f
i
L
l
l
a
t
a
g
n
i
h
t
o
n
–
H
e
l
e
n
K
e
l
l
e
r
o t s i s e h t e t a u d a r g r e d n u s i h t e t a c i d e d I
y
M belovedparents s r e t s i s o w t y M
i v
S T N E M E G D E L W O N K C A
I o d r e v e
N passt hi smoment wtihou tword soft hanks to t hefollowing
e l p o e
p , t hough t housandst hank sstli lcanno tdescirbe how gratefu l Iam t o have
. y d u t s s i h t d e h s il p m o c c
a In t hef ris tplace, Iwouldl iket ot hank myoneand only
d n e ir f l u f h t u
rt , Jesu sCh irst, rf H so i endles sblessing stha tare given to me
.s s e c o r p s i h t t u o h g u o r h
t It hankHimf o rHegive smes rtengtht opasst het oughes t
e m it .
y m s s e r p x e o t e k il d l u o w
I greates tgrattiude to my advisor ,Dew i
it u t s a y d i
W ,S.Pd. ,M.Hum who ha sspen ther time reading and correcitng my
e t a u d a r g r e d n
u thesis paitenlty. I appreciate he r wliilngness to share he r
d n a e m h ti w e g d e l w o n
k he rguidance to ifnish thi sthesi .s Ialso would ilke to
o c y m k n a h
t -adviso rDr .F.X .Siswad iM.A .fo rcorrecitng thi sthesis carefully
e m g n i v i g r o f d n
a advicet obemoreciritcal .
y
M sincerestt hankfulnes sgoe stomybelovedparents ,AbahandMamio
y a r p r i e h t r o
f e randsuppo tr ,andalsof o rthei rendles saffecitonineverystiuaiton ,
d n
a to t hesexiest issteri nmyl fie ,Owenand Pi , pti whoalway sencourage meto
y d u t s s i h t h s i n
if .I t hankGraciafo rbeingmybes tpalt hroughou tcollege it meand
r o
f having j oyand paint ogether. Iwould ilket ot hankDragon Gendut, KaRan i
, p a h p a
H AngelUdin ,Gaby Gendut ,KaNtiaMarpeol ,and al lmyf irendsi n Beo
9
4 , Iwli lneverf orge tthesillyt hing swehavedone . Iwould ilket o t hankal lmy
n i s d n e ir
f SonakMalela Yogyaka tra , Ithank t hem for i mproving my knowledge
. ll a t a r e t s a m t o n o d I h c i h w e s e n k a t a B t u o b
a Fo rModern Engilsh’ s llf -u itme
s r e h c a e
ii v o
s l a d n a , m a e
t in rtoducingmeat erm“TEAMWORK ,moreweandl es sme” .My
y li m a f t s e g g i
b ni Engilsh Letter s Depa trmen t 2008 , I thank them fo r the
.s r a e y w e f t s a p e h t r o f s s e n r e h t e g o
t Ithank them lal fo rmaking my lfie more
.l u f g n i n a e
m MAYGODBLESSTHEMALL!
N a n a t s ir K e m a
ii i v
Y T I L A N I G I R O F O T N E M E T A T S
I honesltydeclaret hatt hist hesis ,whichI havew irtten ,doe sno tcontaint hework d n a s n o it a t o u q e h t n i d e ti c e s o h t t p e c x e , e l p o e p r e h t o f o k r o w e h t f o s tr a p r o
. d l u o h s r e p a p c if it n e i c s a s a , s e c n e r e f e r
2 1 0 2 r e b m e t p e S 7 2 , a tr a k a y g o Y
x i
S T N E T N O C F O E L B A T
… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … E G A P E L T I
T .
… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … E G A P L A V O R P P
A . ..
E C N A T P E C C
A PAGE................................................................................. .. … … … … … I S A K I L B U P N A U J U T E S R E P N A A T A Y N R E P R A B M E L
… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … E G A P O T T O
M .. ....
… . … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … S T N E M E G D E L W O N K C
A .
STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY ………. … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … S T N E T N O C F O E L B A
T ..
T C A R T S B
A ………………………………………………………………... …
… … … … … … … … … … … … K A R T S B
A ………………………………..
… … … … N O I T C U D O R T N I : I R E T P A H
C ………………………….........
.
A Backgroundoft heStudy…………………………………………….
.
B ProblemFormulaiton………………………………………………...
.
C Objecitve soft heStudy………………………………………………
.
D Deifniitono fTerm s………………………………………………….
… … … … … … … … … … … … W E I V E R L A C I T E R O E H T : I I R E T P A H C
.
A Reviewo fRelatedStudie s…………………………………………...
.
B Reviewo fRelatedTheo ire s…………………………………………
n o it a z ir e t c a r a h C d n a r e t c a r a h C f o y r o e h T .
1 ………………………...
n e e w t e b n o it a l e R e h T .
2 PsychologyandLtierature...………………
.
C Theoryo fAnit-socia lPersonaltiyDisorde r……………………..... ....
.
D TheoreitcalFramework………………………………………………
I I I R E T P A H
C :METHODOLOGY………………………………………
.
A Objec toft heStudy…………………………………………………..
.
B Approachoft heStudy……………………………………………….
.
C Methodoft heStudy…………………………………………………
V I R E T P A H
C :ANALYSIS……………………………………………….
.
A TheCharacteirsitcsofJ ean-BapitsteGrenouille…………………….
d e tr e v o rt n I .
1 ………………………………………………………...
g n i k r o W d r a H .
2 ……………………………………………………..
e v it a n i g a m I .
3 ………………………………………………………..
l u ft i e c e D .
4 …………………………………………………………..
s s e l e s r o m e R .
5 ……………………………………………………….
.
6 Ambiitous…………………………………………………………
.
B Jean-Bap itsteGrenouille’ sAnitsocia lPersonaltiyDisorde r...............
s m r o N l a i c o S o t m r o f n o C o t e r u li a F .
1 ……………………………...
s s e n l u ft i e c e D .
2 ……………………………………………………...
d a e h A n a l P o t e r u li a F r o y ti v i s l u p m I .
3 ……………………………..
e s r o m e R f o k c a L .
4 …………………………………………………..
i ii ii i
v i
v vi i v ii
ix xi xii
1 1 5 5 6
7 7 0 1
1 1
2 1
3 1
6 1
7 1
7 1
8 1
9 1
1 2
1 2
2 2
5 2
8 2
9 2
1 3
3 3
4 3
5 3
8 3
9 3
x
… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … N O I S U L C N O C : V R E T P A H C
… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … Y H P A R G O I L B I
B ..........
… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … X I D N E P P
A ………………………….
4 4
7 4
ii x
K A R T S B A
. U L U P U T I P A N A N A T S I R K E M A
D ANTI-SOCIAL PERSONALITY
S ’ D N I K S Ü S K C I R T A P N I R E T C A R A H C N I A M E H T F O R E D R O S I D
. R E R E D R U M A F O Y R O T S E H T , E M U F R E
P Yogyakatra :Jurusan Sasrta
s ir g g n
I ,Fakutla sSasrta ,Universtia sSanataDharma ,2012.
n a i d a b ir p e
K seseorang dapa t mengalam i perubahan seiirng dengan n
a h a b m a tr e
p usia . Dalam prose s perkembangan kep irbadian ,beberapa fakto r i
u h a t e k i
d memiilk ipengaruht erhadapprose spembentukankep irbadians eseorang g
n a p m i y n e m l a h a d a p e k h a r a g n e m g n a
y .Dalam nove lkaryaPatirck Süskind i n i a
m a t u h o k o t n a k r a b m a g i
d yang bernama Jean-Bapitste Grenouille sebaga i y
g n a r o e
s ang memiilki gangguan kep irbadian. Karakter-karakter yang dimiilk i a
k i s a k i d n i g n e m a m a t u h o k o
t n bahwa tokoh utama mengalam i gangguan .
l a i s o s it n a n a i d a b ir p e k
t a p a d r e
T dua permasalahan yang dibahas dalam peneilitan ini .Kedua n
a h a l a s a m r e
p tersebu t ialah : (1 ) Bagaimana tokoh utama dalam nove l B
) 2 ( , n a k r a b m a g i
d agaimana karakter dar i tokoh utama mengungkap bahwa h
o k o
t utamat ersebu tmendertiagangguankep irbadi na anitsosi a.l i g o l o k i s p n a t a k e d n e p n a k a n u g n e m i n i n a it il e n e
P karena membaha s s
i g o l o k i s p k e p s
a tokoh utamanya .Teor iyang digunakan yatiu t eor ikarakte rdan n
a h o k o n e
p , teor i yang menunjukkan adanya hubungan antara psikolog i dan ,
a rt s a
s dant eorit entanggangguankep irbadiananitsosial .Metodeyangdigunakan e
d o t e m h a l a d
a stud ipustaka .Selain buku-buku terkati ,aritke lse tra d ata dar i g
n a y t e n r e t n
i berkatiandengantopiktersebu tjugadigunakandalams tud ii n.i ,
s i s il a n a n a k r a s a d r e
B tokoh tuama yang bernama Jean-Bapitste n
a i d a b ir p e k n a u g g n a g i m a l a g n e m e ll i u o n e r
G anitsosial .Gejala-gejalanya telah n
u h a t s a l e b a m il a i s u r e b k a j e s a m a rt u h o k o t h e l o n a k k u j n u ti
d yang diindikasikan g
n e
d an memenuh i empa t dar i tujuh krtieira . Kesimpulan in i didapa t dar i p
a d a h r e t n a t a m a g n e
p karakter-karakte ryang dimiilkinya yatiu tetrutup ,pekejra k a d it n a d , h a l a s r e b a s a r a y n u p k a d it , g n o h o b r e b a k u s , fi t a n ij a m i , s a r e k
n a k i d i d n e p r e
b . Dar i karakter-karakte r tersebut kemudian dicocokkan dengan a
l a j e
g -gejala menurut t eor igangguan kep irbadian anitsosial. Krtieira atau gejala u
ti a y a m a tr e
p Grenouille gagal dalam beritngkah laku menuru tnorma sosia l n
a k k u j n u ti
d dengan karakte ryang t etrutup. Krtieirakeduayatiu penuh itpu daya k
o c o
c dengan karaktern ya yang suka berbohong . Krtieira keitga yatiu s
a ti v i s l u p m
i aa t u keitdakmampuan untuk membua t rencana kedepan cocok n
a g n e
d karaktern ya yang imaginaitve , peke jra keras , dan ambisius. Krtie ira u
ti a y r i h k a r e
t itdak adanya rasa bersalah setelah menyakti iorang lain cocok n
a g n e
1
I R E T P A H C
N O I T C U D O R T N I
.
A Backgroundoft heStudy
g n i e b l a i c o s s
A s ,humans interac twtih othe rpeoplemos to fthei r itme.
. n o it a c i n u m m o c d e ll a c l o o t a g n i s u y b e n o d s i n o it c a r e t n i e h
T Thewrtier learns
t a h
t individuals haveconneciton wtih other sby the ful ifllmen to fthei rphysica l
. s d e e
n The fulifllmen t tisel fthen can be the objecitve so fthe relaitonship .To
.l l e w e t a c i n u m m o c o t w o h w o n k d l u o h s s n a m u h , p i h s n o it a l e r e h t n i a t n i a m
g n i v a
H a relaitonship i sexpected to have a mutua lcondiiton .Wha t
e l p o e
p have obtained should be equa lto wha tthey have done to other .s Thi s
n o it a u ti
s inwhichindividuals ares urroundedbyothersinrtoduce sthewrtie rtothe
. e v i g d n a e k a t f o s m r e
t Duet o t hef eedback, onei ndividualt o anotheri ndividua l
k e e s ll i
w fo reachothe rinordert of ulifllt herii nterests .Thisi nterrelaitonshipthen
e h t e b n a
c essenita lcrtieiratha tindividuals areno tonlyindividua lbeingsbu talso
s g n i e b l a i c o
s .
, s g n i e b l a i c o s s a n o it c n u f e h t g n ir e d i s n o
C thei ndividuals lpay arolea s
ri e h
t owncharacte.rTher olet ha tthei ndividuals playi sagoodway tounderstand
m e h
t selve .s T hat way can be the effec to fthe relaitonship and also can be the
d o h t e
m o fde ifning who ani ndividual si . According t o Lindgren ,“Thesefli st he
s ’ e n o f o t l u s e
r interaciton swtih other sand can be perceived only in term so f
fl e s e n o f o s t p e c r e p ’ s r e h t
o . ”(1969 :200) .Thi squotaitonsayst ha tthei ndividual’s
s i r e t c a r a h
l a u d i v i d n
i ’s characte rshow shi so rhe rqualtiy in orde rto bedisitncitve .In othe r
d r o
w s ,thei ndividual’ spersonaltiyi sablet obes hapedbyt hoser elaitonships .The
s ’l a u d i v i d n
i personaltiy may be relfected in one’ spoin to fview .An individual
n e tf
o a s sk somebody else wha tkind o fperson he o rshe is .The individua’l s
s g n ir b r e h r o m i h e n if e d o t y ti li b a n
i the understanding o fthe impo trance o f
. e c n e t s i x e ’ s r e h t o
y r e v
E individua lhas thei rownpersonaltiywhichentrielydescirbes et ri h
e g a m
i .Thepersonaltiy tisel fdoe sno tappeari nacetrain momen tandt hen form
h
w a tkind o fperson heo rshei ,s however tii si n ilnea s itmegoe sby. According
r o f y ti c a p a c e h t y l e r e m , h tr i b t a y ti l a n o s r e p o n s a h l a u d i v i d n i e h T “ , n o t n i L o t
w e f a d n a e n o g n i p o l e v e
d oft heelement swhich wli lbei ntegrated i nto t he ifna l
f n o
c iguraiton.” (1936 :465-466) .From thi squotaiton ,the wrtier reailzes tha t
l a u d i v i d n
i s dono tb irngtheripersonaltiyf romt hebeginningo ftheirl fie.I tgrow s
s d n if d n
a ti swhole nature through every single step fo thei rlfie .Some people
r e t c a r a h c y l e v il d n a , g n o rt s , e u q i n u a h c u s e v a h o t d n e
t isitcinordert ohavel ot so f
p e m o s , t s a rt n o c n I . e l p m a x e r o f s d n e ir
f eople may someitme sprefer t o be alone
e v a h d n
a noi nteresti nassociaitngwtihpeople .Moreover ,Lintons aid,
f o e n o y li r a m ir p e b o t s m e e s n o it a m r o f y ti l a n o s r e p f o s s e c o r p e h T
o t s e it il a u q l a n o it u ti t s n o c s i h h ti w e c n e ir e p x e s ’l a u d i v i d n i e h t g n it a r g e t n i
s i h T . e l o h w l a n o it c n u f , d e t s u j d a y ll a u t u m a m r o
f proces sconitnue s g
n ir u d e v it c a t s o m e b o t s m e e s t u b e fi l t u o h g u o r h
t the earile ryears 3
9 1 , n o t n i L
( 6 :466).
t a h t s y a s e v o b a h p a r g a r a p e h
T everything occur sin individua’l slfie
ti w r e h t e g o t k r o
w ht hequailitest hey have ,in lfuenceonf orming personaltiy. I sti
o s l
g n i w o r
g ineverys tageo fhi so rherage sthroughout elfi ,t herefore,t hepersonaltiy
r e h ti e t a h
t individual ro theenvrionmentf orms,f unciton sa sasignt oshowhi so r
r e
h imagedfiferf romonet oanothe.r
g n i p o l e v e d f o s s e c o r p e h t g n ir u
D o findividua’ls personaltiy ,there are
e m o
s factor stha t may cause individua’ls personaltiy to be in disorder . The
r e d r o s i d n i s i y ti l a n o s r e
p canbeseenf romdeviantbehavio .rDevian tbehavio rcan
a s a d i a s e
b bnorma lbehavio ra swel lto ease the understanding wtih the more
. m r e t r a il i m a
f Abnorma lheremean sawayf romnorma.l
n i s i t a h w t u b t n e l a v e r p t s o m s i t a h w t o n s i l a m r o n f o n o it i n if e d r u O
e l b a li a v a e h t h ti w g n i p e e
k knowledge concerning the individua land ,
n a m e l o C ( n a m f o s d e e n l a i c o
s 1964 : ). 18
n a e d a m s a h y t e i c o s t a h t g n i h t y r e v e o t s r e f e r e r e h l a m r o n m r e t e h T
m e e r g
a en tonsomething. Somethingherer efer stot heconvenitona lcustomt hati s
a h e b f o d r a d n a t s a s a d e s
u ving in society. Therefore ,anything ou t o f tha t
. l a m r o n b a d e m u s s a s i t n e m e e r g
a Everypersonexhibti shi so rher personaltiy rtati s
d n e e h t n i t a h t s ti a rt y ti l a n o s r e p r i e h t o d r e v o y a m m e h t f o e m o S . y a w t n e r e f fi d n i
s r e h t o r o s e v l e s m e h t r o f r e h ti e l u f m r a h e b d l u o c t
i . Abnorma lbehavio rusually
a p m i d a b s e v i
g ctt o t hesociety tisefl. Duet o t hefactt ha tbehaviori sone of t he
n i s t n e m e l
e individual’ spersonaltiy ,i tcan be said tha tthe abnorma lbehavio r
.r e d r o s i d n i s i y ti l a n o s r e p r e h r o s i h s w o h
s An i ndividual ’personaltiy disorderi s
e c n e u lf n
i b y some factors . Fo r instance , a chlid’ s envrionmen t i s juvenlie
t n e u q n il e
d s h .T iss or to fcaseb irng sanoppo truntiyt oachlidt obeapar toft hem ,
n e v
e follow thei raciton. Thi scondiiton give sbad impac tto the chlid and the
y t e i c o
g n i m r o f n i e l o r t n a c if i n g i
s personaltiy .Conside irngt hei mpact ,t hepersoni sseen
a e v a h o
t d fiifcutly ilving among society. Tha tdfi ifcutly doe sno tnecessarliy
n a e
m they arei ncapablet o ge tconnected t o othe rpeople ,bu tmoreon t het hing s
. o t d e s u g n it t e g t o n e r a y e h t t a h
t
, e r o m r e h tr u
F abnormal behavio rwhich show sthe lack o fconcern fo r
e b n a c e l p o e p r e h t
o indicated to suffer a itn -socia lpersonaltiy disorder .A person
o h
w suffers thi spersonaltiy disorder tend to break the socia lrule ,hence othe r
l a u d i v i d n
i s disilke thei r presence and stay away from them. “Anitsocia l
r o c i h t a p o h c y s p s a n w o n k y l s u o i v e r p n e e b s a h h c i h w , r e d r o s i d y ti l a n o s r e p
r o i v a h e b t n a i v e d f o n r e tt a p a s i , r e d r o s i d y ti l a n o s r e p c i h t a p o i c o
s tha ti sseirou s
.) 8 1 3 : 0 8 9 1 , o r e n i m i C d n a y e h a L ( ” . y t e i c o s d n a l a u d i v i d n i e h t r o f h t o b
s e z y l a n a s i s e h t s i h
T Perfume , The Story o f a Murderer w irtten by
n a e J d e m a n r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t n o s e s u c o f s i s e h t s i h T . d n i k s ü S k c ir t a
P -Bapitste
e ll i u o n e r
G .Int hi snovel ,Grenouillei sdepicteda soneoft heexampleo faperson
n a m o r f s r e f f u s o h
w it-socia lpersonaltiy disorder .The autho rha sdescirbed the
r e t c a r a h c n i a
m a sa dramaitc murderer wtih some interesitng characteirsitc .s
r e d r u m a s e m o c e b e ll i u o n e r
G e ro fvrigingilr sbecausehei sobsessedwtihmaking
t s e r e t n i g n o rt s s i H . s g n i e b n a m u h y b e d a m e m u f r e
p wtih human body odors si
.r o d o y d o b s s e s s o p t o n s e o d e ll i u o n e r G t a h t t c a f e h t n o d e s a
b He use stha t
y d o b n w o s i h o t n o e m u f r e
p inordert ober ecognizedandbecomepar tofs ociety.
o t s i h c r a e s e r s i h t f o e c n a tr o p m i e h
T identfiythemaincharacte rha sanit
. r e d r o s i d y ti l a n o s r e p l a i c o
. h c a o r p p
a Whlie proving the idea ,the wrtie rcan learn the symptom and the
e l p o e p s d r a w o t s t c e f f
e a swell.
.
B ProblemFormula iton
e h t e t a l u m r o f o t s d e e n r e ti r w e h t , e v o b a d n u o r g k c a b e h t g n i e e s r e tf A
e h t d e t a l u m r o f s a h r e ti r w e h T . s i s y l a n a e h t n o s u c o f o t r e d r o n i s m e l b o r p
.s w o ll o f s a s m e l b o r p
.
1 Howi sJean-BapitsteGrenouille ed picte d?
.
2 How do Grenouille’ scharacteirsitc srevea la -nitsocia lpersonaltiy
r e d r o s i
d symptoms?
.
C Objecitve soft heStudy
r o j a m e h t t a h t a e d i n a f o f o o r p e h t n o s u c o f ll i w h c r a e s e r s i h
T characte r
s
i having a -nit socia lbehavior analyzed from hi scharacteirsitcs .The aim of t hi s
b o r p e h t r e w s n a o t s i y d u t
s lem sformulated above .The fris tstep i sto descirbe
n a e
J -BapitsteGrenouille’ scharacterisitcon t hi snovel .Thewrtie rmakes a ils to f
n e e s r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t f o s c it s ir e t c a r a h c e h
t no tonly from hi sfeeilng ,atttiude ,
r o i v a h e
b ,andr eaciton ot wardhimsel fandt heothers ,butalsohi swayoft hinking.
r e t c a r a h c e h t g n i b ir c s e d r e tf a h c r a e s e r s i h t f o e v it c e j b o t s a l e h
T isitcist o
r e w s n
a and t oprovet ha tGrenouillesuffersf rom anit-socia lpersonaltiydisorder .
f o o r p s i h
.
D De ifniitono fTerms
s i e r e h
T a term tha t need s to be explained in orde r to avoid
. g n i d n a t s r e d n u s i
m Diagnositc and Staitsitca lManua lo fMenta lDisorde rForth
Ediiton ,Text Revision state stha tan it-socia lpersonaltiy disorde ri san endu irng
t c e p x e e h t m o r f y l d e k r a m s e t a i v e d t a h t r o i v a h e b d n a e c n e ir e p x e r e n n i f o n r e tt a p
of thei ndividua’l scutlure, i spervasiveand lfexible ,ha san onset i n adolescence
s i , d o o h d li h c y lr a e r
o stable overitme , and lead s to disrtes s o r imparimen t
(Frances ,ed .2000 :685 .)
h t f o g n i n a e m e h t n o d e s a
B e explanaiton above ,the wrtie rcan take a
s r e f f u s o h w n o s r e p a g n i g d u j r o f a ir e ti r c e h t t a h w f o n o i s u l c n o
c from a -nit socia l
r e d r o s i d y ti l a n o s r e
p . A person wtih anit-socia lpersonaltiy disorde rshows the
e t a i c o s s a o t y ti li b a p a c n
i wtihothe rpeople ,and tii sprominent .T hesymptom scan
r e h r o s i h m o r f n e e s e
b behavio rdu irng chlidhood. T he behavio rin the ifna l
s e t a c i d n
i thatt hepersoni snol onge rbehavingnormallyand ha sanimpac to nthe
f l e s ti n o s r e
7
I I R E T P A H C
W E I V E R L A C I T E R O E H T
.
A Reviewo fRelatedStudies
e m u f r e
P wa so irginally pubilshed a sDa sParfum in 1986 in German .
n a e J d e m a n n a h p r o n a f o y r o t s c if ir r o h a t u o b a s ll e t l e v o n s i h
T -Bapitste
e n n A e i S . e ll i u o n e r
G CK . . in he rstudy en itlted Grenouille’ sAnxiety and Hi s
o t t r o ff
E Dea lwtih tIsays ,“Jean-BapitsteGrenouilleundergoesr ealtiyanxietya s
s i h o t e u d p u s e m o c g n i h t e n o r o f y t e i x n a y ti l a e r s i H . y t e i x n a c it o r u e n s a l l e w
p x e c it a m u a
rt eirence in hi schlidhood.” (2010 :60 )The quotaiton show stha t
m e l b o r p l a c i g o l o h c y s p s a h e ll i u o n e r
G because o fhi spast .Hi sexpeirence being
e t c e j e
r dbyhi smothe r irgh ta tfe rhei sborn give shim an understanding t ha thei s
m o r f e r a c d n a n o it c e f f a s t e g r e v e n e h f l e s ti n o it c e j e r e h t e c n i S . d i k d e t n a w n u
y li m a
f and society. Knowing hi sunpleasan texpeirenceofl fie ,Grenouillesuffer s
. y t e i x n a n w o s i h m o r f
e i
S adds , “Through the analysis , i t can be said tha t Jean-Bapitste
t c e p s e r e l p o e p e k a m d n a r e m u f r e p g n i e b y b y t e i x n a s i h h ti w l a e d n a c e ll i u o n e r G
i h f o e s u a c e b m i
h snew creaiton in t he ar to fperfumery” .(2010 :61) .From t hi s
r e ti r w e h t n o it a t o u
q canconcludethatt hewayGrenouilledeal swtihhisf eeilngo f
y r r o
w si by being a perfumer .Becoming a grea tperfumer who creates a brand
a l u m r o f w e
n i sGrenouilles’ sdream .Grenouillet hinksthatt his si theonlywayt o
e k a
l a b i n n a c d n a r e r e d r u m a e m o c e b e
h .Hi sbehavio runfoldshi spersonaltiywhichi s
.r e d r o s i d n i
y r a r e ti l n a m r e G f o e l p m a x e e v it i n if e d a e m o c e b s a h t a h w n I “
y r a r e ti l d n a y ti t n e d i l a n o s r e p h ti w n r e c n o c s i h s t c e j o r p d n i k s ü S , m s i n r e d o m t s o p
f o s r e t c a r a h c d n a e m e h t e h t o t n o a n o s r e
p Da sPa frum.”(Adams ,2000 :259 )T he
f o r o h t u
a Pe frume ,TheStoryo faMurdereri soneoft heexample soft hel tierary
d o ir e p e h t g n ir u d e s ir e u s s i s i h T . y ti t n e d i f o h c r a e s e h t f o c i p o t e h t tf il h c i h w t s it r a
. a r e n r e d o m t s o p f o
. y d u t s s u o i v e r p e h t d n a c i p o t s i h t n e e w t e b y ti r a li m i s s i e r e h
T The
s s u c s i d h c i h w c i p o t e m a s e h t n o s e il y ti r a li m i
s e sa -nit socia lpersonaltiydisorder .
,r e v e w o
H thi sstudy t ire sto develop the analysi so fanitsocia lbehavio rin an
w e n e m o s f o n o it a v r e s b
o characteirsitcs .The previou sstudie swli lincrease the
e g d e l w o n
k about t hi sobjec tand also t o srtengthen t hi sresearch .By t aking t hi s
s e p o h r e ti r w e h t , c i p o
t the reader sunderstand why a person such a sGrenouille
. y t e i c o s n o t c a p m i e h t o s l a d n a , y a w t a h t n i s e v a h e b
.
B Reviewo fRelatedTheories
ti r w e h t ,t r a p s i h t n
I e rwould ilket o discusst her elated t heo ire st hatare
n i d e il p p
a thi sresearch .They are theory o fcharacte rand characteirzaiton, some
e h t t u o b a s n o it a n a l p x
e relaitons hipbetween l tieratureandpsychology ,and theory
it n a f
.
1 Theoryo fCharacter sandCharacteriza iton
3 9 9 1 ( s m a r b A o t g n i d r o c c
A : 23) , “the character s are the person s
s a r e d a e r e h t y b d e t e r p r e t n i e r a o h w , k r o w e v it a r r a n r o c it a m a r d a n i d e t n e s e r p
a h t s e it il a u q l a n o it o m e d n a , l a n o it i s o p s i d , l a r o m h ti w d e w o d n e g n i e
b t are
y a s y e h t t a h w n i d e s s e r p x
e -the dialogue-and by wha tthey do-the aciton.” A ny
s a d e z ir o g e t a c s e r n e g y r a r e ti l r e h t o r o l e v o n e h t n i r a e p p a n o s r e p f o s e m a n
r e t c a r a h
c tt ha canbeobservedno tonlyfromt henarraitonf romt heautho rbu talso
r i e h t m o r
f speech and t heri acitons .Each characte rast hei rown r oleexposes the
fl e s ti e l p o e p f o e r u t a
n tobet hei rdisitnctf eature.
n
I ReadingtheNovel ,An Introducitont o t heTechnique so fInterpreitng
FicitonE .M .Forster ,a spointedbyHenkle ,saidt hatt hecharacte rcanbedivided
d n u o r d n a , r e t a e r c r i e h t n i a e d i t e s a y b d e ll e p m o c e r a o h w s r e t c a r a h c t a lf o t n i
e r u t a n n a m u h f o s e it i x e l p m o c d n a s n o it a ir a v e h t l l a y d o b m e o h w s r e t c a r a h
c .
t e s u a c e b e b ir c s e d o t tl u c if fi d t a h w e m o s s i r e t c a r a h c d n u o
R hi scharacte rexpresse s
. e r u t a n n a m u h a f o y ti x e l p m o c e h
t Forste raddst hatt heeasies tway t o i dentfiya
r e d a e r e h t e s ir p r u s o t e l b a p a c s i r e t c a r a h c e h t r e h t e h w g n it s e t y b r e t c a r a h c d n u o r
. t o n r
o I tcan be said thi scharacte rshow ssome quailite stha tcan evoke the
g n il e e f s ’ r e d a e
r (1977 :91 .)
r e h tr u
F Harmon(2009 :95 )says ,“Thecharacteirzaitoni st hecreaitono f
t a h t s n a e m t I ” . e k il e fi l m e e s n a c y e h t t a h t o s s n o s r e p y r e g a m
i thecharacteirzaiton
r e t c a r a h c e h t g n i b ir c s e d f o d o h t e m a s
i .Thecharacter’ sdevelopmenti sexplained
. n o it a z ir e t c a r a h c h g u o r h t d e b ir c s e d d n
a Byl earningt het heoryo fcharacteirzaiton ,
s i r e ti r w e h
c it a m e t s y s n i n o it i d n o c n a m u h t u o b a n r a e l l li w e l p o e p y g o l o h c y s
p way ,
h g u o r h t , e li h w n a e
m ltieraturepeoplewill l earn abou tpsychologica lvaluein t he
g n it ir w f o t r
a .A human condiitoncanbeobservedf rom t hecharacterst hati st he
.r o h t u a n a f o t h g u o h t e v it a e r c f o t c u d o r
p Psychologica lvalue can be learn t
e h t h g u o r h
t observaiton oft heauthor’ spersonaltiy tisefl ,kind so femoitondu irng
e h
t processoft hew iritng ,and ifnally theoutcomeoft her eade ratferr eadingt he
. y r o t s e ri t n e
, t c i d e r p , e b ir c s e d , d n a t s r e d n u o t s t p m e tt a t a h t e c n e i c s e h t s i y g o l o h c y s P
c n e u lf n i d n
a e – paritculalry human behavior .The psychologis tmay h c r a e s e r d n a s e ir o e h t e h t y l p p a y a m e h r o , y ll a c if it n e i c s r o i v a h e b y d u t s
p l a c it c a r p o t s r e h t o f o s g n i d n
if roblems . Someitme s he doe s both )
4 : 2 7 9 1 , h s il a K
( .
r e h t o e h t t u o b a e r o m g n i h t e m o s n r a e l o t s u s e v o r p m i e r u t a r e ti l g n i y d u t S
n i y r e t s a m r u o d e e n l li w r e t c a r a h c e h t g n i z y l a n a , e c n a t s n i r o F . s d l e if
. y g o l o h c y s p g n i d n a t s r e d n u
.
C Theoryo fA -n itsocia lPersonaltiyDisorder
it n
A -socia lpersonaltiy disorde rbelong sto cluste rB o fthe personaltiy
. r e d r o s i
d Thi sgroup i sclassi ifed a sthe mos tdramaitc ,emoitonal ,and erraitc
. r o i v a h e
b Thet heory sayst ha taperson can bej udged suffeirng from anit-socia l
d l u o h s r e d r o s i d y ti l a n o s r e
p beatl eas tatt heageo f18 year sold ,andha sshown a
g n ir r u c c o s r e h t o f o s t h g ir e h t f o n o it a l o i v d n a r o f d r a g e r s i d f o n r e tt a p e v i s a v r e p
y b d e t a c i d n i s a , s r a e y 5 1 e g a e c n i
s three o rmore o fthe fo llowing indicaiton s
o t g n i d r o c c
a DiagnositcandSta itsitca lManua lo fMenta ldisorder ,ForthEdiiton ,
n o i s i v e R t x e
.
1 Faliuret oConformt oSocia lNorms
l a i c o s e h t k a e r b n e tf o n o s r e p s i h t ,r e h t o o t t c e p s e r f o k c a l y e h t e s u a c e B
y lt n e u q e r f e r a y e h t tl u s e r a s a d n a , m r o
n arrested.
.
2 Deceiftulness
They ilet oothersf o rparitculari nteniton ,which basically only t heyge t
.t if e n e b e h t
.
3 Impulsiv tiyorFaliuret oPlanAhead
k s ir e h t g n ir e d i s n o c t u o h ti w y l s u o e n a t n o p s t c a n e tf o y e h
T s and t hey are
g n i h t e m o s t u o b a k n i h t o t e l b a t o
n todoint hef uture.
.
4 Irrtiab litiyandAggres isveness
n e tf o e l p o e p e s e h
T attackpeoplephysicallyo remoitonally
.
5 Reckles sDisregardf ors afetyo fSel forOthers
g n it ti m m o c r e tf a r e g n a d n i e r a y e h t t a h t e r a w a o t e r a c t o n o d y e h t e c n i S
e r a y e h t , n o it c a r i e h
t barelyworirest ot hinkaboutt hei rownsafety ,etiherf o r
.s r e h t o r o s e v l e s m e h t
.
6 ConsistentI rresponsiblitiy
y e h
T are usually unemploymen tfo rlong pe irod ,and do no thave a
. b o j r e h t o n a g n it t e g r o f n a l p c it s il a e r
.
7 Lacko fRemorse
e s e h t t a h t d i a s e b n a c t
I people ha slos tthei rcompassion .They rarely
e e
f lregret t o what t hey havedone ,etihe rhaving hu tr ,misrteated, o rstolen
y t e i c o s e h t e e
s in t heform o ffamliy member .The famliy tisefl si considered a s
s a d n a y t e i c o s t s e s o l c e h
t afactori nf orminghi so rherpersonaltiy(1986 :237).
.
D Theoreitca lFramework
e h t g n ir e w s n a n i tr o p p u s o t r e d r o n i s e ir o e h t e m o s s e d i v o r p y d u t s s i h T
. r e t p a h c s u o i v e r p e h t n i d e n o it n e m n o it a l u m r o f m e l b o r
p Thi sstudy can develop
s s u c s i d h c i h w s e i d u t s s u o i v e r p e h t f o e n
o Grenouille’ ssuffe irng from anxiety
r e d r o s i d h t o b e s u a c e b r e d r o s i
d s can be associated. Fris,t t heory of characte rand
s u n o it a z ir e t c a r a h
c ed to answe rproblem numbe rone .Thi sstudy use sAbrams’
h t g n it n e s e r p n i d o h t e
m e character .By applying Abrams’ theory, t he wrtie rcan
n a e J r e t c a r a h c f o d n i k t a h w y fi t n e d
i -BapitsteGrenouillei s, seenf romhi satttiude ,
g n i k n i h t f o y a w s i h d n a , e s n o p s e r d n a g n i k a e p s f o y a w s i
h ineverydayl fie.
f o y r o e h
T ther elaitonofl tieratureandpsychologyi susedt ogivedeepe r
m o
c prehensiont hatl tieraturei scorrelatedwtihanothe r ifeld .Sincet heaimoft hi s
l a e v e r o t s i y d u t
s tha tthe main character suffer sfrom anit-socia lpersonaltiy
e l b a ti u s t s o m e h t s i y g o l o h c y s p , r e d r o s i
d ifeldt obei ncluded.
l a n o s r e p l a i c o s it n a f o y r o e h
T tiy disorder si used to answe rproblem
I . o w t r e b m u
n ti sapp iled here aim sto know wha tare the crtieira o f being
l a i c o s it n
a and t he explanaiton from t heexpetrs .Theexplanaiton help sthewrtier
h t e h w w o n k o
t e rthe main characte rha sanitsocial behavioro rno tby analyzing
s c it s ir e t c a r a h c s i
h .Thosecharacteirsitc sshould ful ifll t he requriemen to fhaving
l a i c o s it n
7 1
I I I R E T P A H C
Y G O L O D O H T E M
s u c o f ll i w y d u t s e h t f o t c e j b o , t s ri F . s tr a p n i a m e e r h t f o s t s i s n o c t r a p s i h T
S . y d u t s s i h t n i d e s u t a h t e r u t a r e ti l f o k r o w e h t n
o econd ,approach o fthe study
s n i a l p x
e which approach i sused in thi sstudy (psychologica lapproach )which
d o h t e m e h t s i ,t s a l e h T . y ti l a n o s r e p s ’ r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t s e s s u c s i
d of t he study .
t r a p s i h
T exposes thes tep so fanalyzingt hes tudy .
.
A Objec toft heStudy
t c e j b o e h
T o fthisr esearch i st henove lenitlted Perfume ,TheStoryo fa
r e r e d r u
M .Thi snove lwasf ris tpubilshed o irginally a sDa sParfum b ya German
t s il a n r u o j d n a r e ti r
w , Pat irck Süskind in Swtizelrand in 1985 and pub ilshed by
g a lr e V s e n e g o i
D . I t i s rtanslated by John E . Woods , pubilshed by Knop f
. s r e t p a h c 1 5 h ti w s e g a p 5 5 2 s t s i s n o c t I . 6 8 9 1 n i p u o r g g n i h s il b u
p Perfume, The
r e r e d r u M a f o y r o t
S became a globally acclaimed bes tselle rwtih more than
o n s i h T . e d i w d lr o w d l o s s e i p o c n o il li m n e e tf
if ve lha sbeen adaptedf ort hescreen
. 6 0 0 2 n i
d n u o r a e c n a r F n i s t e s l e v o n s i h
T the18thcentury.I nrtoducinganorphan
n a e J d e m a
n -Bap itste Grenouille who wa sborn in the mos tputird spo tin the
e l o h
w ctiy .He ha sno odo rwtihin hi sown body and lack aura tha tmake shim
o t d r a
p u s w o r g e h s
A , he me tBaldini ,afamou sperfumer .He sets up t o be
. e m u f r e p a f o a l u m r o f w e n d n a r b e t a e r c o t y s a t n a f s i h y b d e d n u o r r u
s Wtih f ul lo f
d n i m s i h , r o d o y d o b e v a h t o n s e o d e h t a h t s s e n e r a w
a becomesful loffantasy and
s g n i e b n a m u h f o r o d o e h t g n it a ti m i f o n o i s s e s b
o .Hi sobsession turn shimi nto a
r e d r u
m er .By t heskillst ha thego tb y workingw tih Baldini ,hei sablet o pursue
d a e d d n u o f e r e w s n i g ri v , e n o y b e n o d l o t , 0 4 r e t p a h c n I . m a e r d s i
h ,att heend o f
. n w o d t u c n e e b d a h s n i g ri v l u fi t u a e b t s o m 4 2 n a h t r e w e f o n , 5 7 9 1 r e b m e t p e S
.
B Approachoft heStudy
r f d e t a r a p e s e b t o n n a c e r u t a r e ti l g n i d n a t s r e d n
U om othe r extirnsic
.s t n e m e l
e Fo r instance talking abou t the characters , i t i s connected to the
h c a o r p p a l a c i g o l o h c y s
p duet ot hefactt hatt hecharactersarehumanbeing .sSince
f o m e l b o r p l a c o f e h
t thi sstudyi st or evealt ha tGrenouillesuffersfroma -nit socia l
r e d r o s i d y ti l a n o s r e
p , the mos t approp irate approach whose subjec t i s abou t
y ti l a n o s r e
p i s psychologica l approach. According to Gueirn, “In Ltierature ,
l a c i g o l o h c y s p d n a l a n o it o m e g n it a e rt f o d o h t e m a s i h c a o r p p a l a c i g o l o h c y s p
) 8 4 1 : 9 7 9 1 ( ” .r e d r o s i
d Thewrtier can use t hi sapproach to dea lwtih someone’ s
s n o it o m
e andevens uchani llnessthatt heys uffe.r
n i s d o o W d n a r e g r e b r h o
R ReadingandWriitngabou tL tieraturesayt ha t
m o r f e r u t a r e ti l f o k r o w a s a l e v o n e h t e z y l a n a o t s u s g n ir b h c a o r p p a l a c i g o l o h c y s p
t a h t t c a f e h t o t e u D . ) 3 1 : 2 7 9 1 ( g n i e b n a m u h f o w e i v f o t n i o p l a c i g o l o h c y s p e h t
e h
t main problem o fthi sthesi si slaid on the main characte rwhich i shuman
o t r e ti r w e h t p l e h o t d e s u s i h c a o r p p a l a c i g o l o h c y s
P reveal theissuetha t
g n ir e f f u s s i r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h
t from an itsocia lbehavior .Sincealso t hecharacte r
g n i e b n a m u h s i l e v o n e h t n
i s whoi sclosely r elated t o t hepsychologica lproblem ,
i h
t s approachi st hemos tapprop irateapproach.
i s e ir o e h t e h t , d e s u s i h c a o r p p a l a c i g o l o h c y s p e h t e c n i
S n thi sstudy
y g o l o h c y s p t u o b a s n r e c n o
c . I talso makes thi sstudy no tou to fthe topic. T he
e s u r e ti r
w s theory o fanitsocia lpersonaltiy disordert o analyzet hesymptom t hat
e d u ti tt a s i h n i h ti w s w o h s e ll i u o n e r
G ,hi sway oft hinking ,and hisf eeilng toward
e l p o e
p . Thesymptom thenshould completethreeo rmoreoft heseven crtieirao f
.l a i c o s it n a g n i e
b
.
C Methodoft heStudy
d e s u r e ti r w e h
T ilbrary research in orde rto collec tthe data .Thi sd ata
s a
w divided i nto t wo ,p irmary and secondary data .Thep irmary data weretaken
k c ir t a P m o r f y l n
o Süskind’ snove len itltedPerfume :TheStoryo faMurdere .rThe
t c a r a h c o t d e t a l e r s k o o b e m o s m o r f n e k a t e r e w a t a d y r a d n o c e
s e rin the novel ,
r e d r o s i d y ti l a n o s r e p l a i c o s it n a t u o b
a ,abou tpsychologica lapproach ,and i nterne t
. c i p o t e h t o t d e t a l e
r Thosew irtten and i nterne tsource swereused t o suppor tand
. a t a d e h t e t e l p m o c d n a
r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t s e z y l a n a h c r a e s e r s i h t e c n i
S , ba ook related to the
a w y ti l a n o s r e
p sThe Study o fMan. Severa lbooks related to the characte rand
, n o it a z ir e t c a r a h
c A Glossary o f Ltierary Terms , A Handbook to Ltierature ,
e w y g o l o h c y s p f o s k o o b l a r e v e
S re Abnorma lPsychology, Abnorma l
, e fi L n r e d o M d n a y g o l o h c y s
P Diagnositc and Staitsitc Manua l o f Menta l
, r e d r o s i
D Introduciton to Socia l Psychology , Maladapitve Behavior ; An
y g o l o h c y s P l a m r o n b A o t n o it c u d o r t n
I .
f e h
T ri st step, the wrtie rread and reread the entrie tex tto ifnd deepe r
t x e n e h T . li a t e d d n a g n i d n a t s r e d n
u s tep wa susing the theory o fcharacte rand
i n o it a z ir e t c a r a h
c nordert o ge tclea rdescirpitonandunderstoodt hepersonaltiyo f
h c n i a m e h
t aracter .The wrtie rmade a ils to fthe characteirsitc so fthe main
.r e t c a r a h c
e h t , p e t s d ri h t e h
T wrtie rcollecte d some studie swtih the same topic ,
d n e e h t n i t a h t s e c n e r e f e r t e g o t e n o d s a w s i h T . l e v o n e h t f o r o h t u a r o , k r o
w , thi s
y d u t
s etihe raimedtogiveanewdiscussion o rdevelopingo rcouldbeopposet he
. a e d i s u o i v e r p
, y d u t s s i h t f o n o it i s o p e h t g n i d n if r e tf
A thewrtierbegan to analyzet he
c a r a h c n i a m e h t f o m e l b o r p l a c i g o l o h c y s
p te r and used theory o f anitsocia l
r e d r o s i d y ti l a n o s r e
p .Byf ocusingont hecrtieirat ha thadbeen ilsted,i twa sablet o
m y s e s o h t h ti w r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t f o s c it s ir e t c a r a h c e h t h c t a
m ptoms .
e h t , p e t s t s a l e h
T wrtie rdrewaconclusionbased ont heanalysist hatt he
s a w r e t c a r a h c n i a
m suffeirng from anitsocia lpersonaltiy disorder by examining
r e t c a r a h c s i
1 2
V I R E T P A H C
S I S Y L A N A
s i h
T p atr wli lanswert heproblem formulaiton menitoned i n t hepreviou s
r e t p a h
c da n systemaitcally divided i nto t wo main patr .s Thefris tpar tcovers t he
n a e J f o n o it a z ir e t c a r a h c d n a r e t c a r a h
c -Bapitste Grenouille, themain characteri n
.l e v o n s i h
t By identfiying and analyzing the character ,the wrtie ris able to go
f o s c it s ir e t c a r a h c e h t y a w e h t g n i s s u c s i d s i h c i h w m e l b o r p t x e n e h t o t r e h tr u f
it n a e h t l a e v e r e ll i u o n e r
G -socia lpersonaltiydisorders ymptom.
.
A TheCharacterisitc so fJean-Bap itsteGrenouille
t a g it s e v n i e h
T ionoft hemaincharacteri st hep irmarys tept or eacht heaim
. y d u t s s i h t f
o The wrtie rwli ldiscus sfris tthe characte rand characteirzaiton o f
n a e
J -Bapitste Grenouille since t he goa lof t hi sstudy i s t o reveal t he personaltiy
r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t y b d e r e f f u s s i t a h t r e d r o s i
d . Thi s idenitifcaiton which
e h t o t y l n o n o it n e tt a y a p l li w r e d a e r e h t t a h t t n a e m s i r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t s t h g il h g i h
. r e t c a r a h c r o j a
m Hi swholecharacte irsitc scan be rtaced f romhisf eeilng ,atttiude ,
h e
b avior ,reaciton ,hi sway o fthinking toward hims efl and othe rpeople. The
i t a h t y r o e h
t sdeifned byAbram sand Harphamist hemos tapprop iratemethod i n
.r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t f o s c it s ir e t c a r a h c e h t g n i z y l a n
a PatirckSüskind haddescirbed
n a e
.
1 Introverte d
tr e v o rt n i s i o h w n o s r e p
A e d show ssome habti swhich i susually no t
y t e i c o s e h t o t d e t c e n n o
c nothing but connected to only themselve .s One o fthe
e l p o e p r e h t o o t k l a t o t n o it c a r e t n i s i h n i n e e s e b d l u o c s ti b a
h .In the novel ,
e n o e m o s s a d e b ir c s e d s i e ll i u o n e r
G whor arelyt s .alk Hespeak sonlyafewwords .
n e h
W hespeak smoret hanusuallyhedoes ,heconsidersi tveryi mpo trant .
r o f t p e c x E . s e v it e l p x e d n a , s e v it c e j d a , s b r e v h ti w d e n r e c n o c s s e l s a w e H
o n “ d n a ” s e y
“ ” – which ,byt heway ,heusedf ort hef ris titmequ tiel ess- he , s t n a l p , s t c e j b o e t e r c n o c r o f s n u o n y l n o y ll a it n e s s e d n a , s n u o n y l n o d e s u
s g n i e b n a m u h , s l a m i n
a -and only then i fthe objects ,plants ,animals ,o r t
a n e d d u s a h ti w m i h e u d b u s d l u o w s g n i e b n a m u
h tack o fodo r(Süskind , .)
4 2 : 6 8 9 1
s d n a t s r e d n u r e ti r w e h
T tha t Grenouille wli l produce word s unde r
s n o it i d n o
c by applying the method o fcharacte irzing w irtten by Abram sand
g n i w o h s s i h c i h w m a h p r a
H , from A Glossary o fLtierary Terms .Grenouille
r e h t O . y a s o t h tr o w e r a s d r o w e s o h t s k n i h t e h n e h w y l n o s k a e p s y l e c r a c
s thant ha t
n i a m e r y l b a b o r p l li w e
h slient .Hewli lsay word sonly to respond to ye so rno
. s n o it s e u
q Fo rinstance ,a condiiton where Grenouille i sforced to speak ou ti s
e m o c e b e h n e h
w svery enthusiasitcabou tallt hings t ha tcould attack hi snose ,a
.r o d o l u f r e w o
p By thi senthusiasm ,he explains wha ti sin hi smind by u tte irng
.s d r o w o t n i m e h t
a , i n i d l a B s t e e m e h n e h w s n e p p a h n o it a s r e v n o c r e g n o l s ’ e ll i u o n e r G
il o h w r e k a m e m u fr e p s u o m a
f ve sin Pont- ua -Change ,a smal ldist irc tin Pa irs .
o t e ll i u o n e r G s d n e s l a m ir G d n a r e h t a e l h s i n a p S e h t r o f n i k s t a o g s r e d r o i n i d l a B
y b b o j d n o c e
s prepairng anew perfumet o be l aunched very soon .Hei sfond o f
t a e r
c i ngsomethingnew .“Theveryf ris tevening ,Grenouillehadt oprepareal arge
a ti l o p a N t i u N f o l l u f n h o ji m e
d ine ,o fwhich ove reighty lfacon sweresold i n t he
S ( ” . y a d t x e n e h t f o e s r u o
c üskind ,1986 :88) .Grenouille’ sfris tday work wtih
f o e lt t o b e g u h a e k a m o t e r a p e r p t s u m e h e s u a c e b , g n it s u a h x e y r e v s a w i n i d l a B
“ . e m u f r e
p Hewasi ndefaitgablewhen i tcamet o crushingbitte ralmondseedsi n
d n a s t o o r t e l o i v g n it a r g r o e fi n k g n i p p o h c a h ti w s ir g r e b m a s s e r p w e r c s e h t
.l o h o c l a t s e n if e h t n i s g n i v a h s e h t g n it s e g i
d ” (Süskind ,1986 :94 .) Grenouille i s
o t d e ti c x e y r e
v work i n t he l aboratory .At l east ,he ha smastered the proces so f
n o it a ll it s i
d ,andhi svocabulaire sarei ncreasingwtihinhi swork.
r e tf
A no longe rworking fo rBaldin iand having a long journey through
e c n a r
F ,int her uedel aLouve ,Grenouillef oundas mal lpefrumer’ sworkshopand
A e m a d a M . b o j a r o f k s
a rnufl iactually did no topen fo rvacancy becauseo fthe
e H . t a h t h ti w m e l b o r p a e v a h t o n s e o d e ll i u o n e r G t u B . m e l b o r p l a i c n a n
if i s ifne
e
b ingpaidonlyt wof ranc saweekands tayi nawindowles scabin.
l l a , e r o m e m o s d e v e i s d n a d e x i m d n a d e p m u d y e h t n e h
T dayl ongwtihou t , d e h c a o r p p a g n i n e v e s a , li t n u , s y a l e d o n d e w o ll a e r u d e c o r p e h t r o f , e s u a p
e s s a p d a h s m o s s o l b f o s e li p e h t ll
a d t hrough t he caldron o foi l(Süskind , .)
5 7 1 : 6 8 9 1
s ’ m a h p r a H d n a s m a r b A s e s u r e ti r w e h t , n o it a t o u q s i h t d n a t s r e d n u o T
c i h w y r o e h
t hi sshowing wirtteni nAGlossaryo fLtieraryTerms .Wecan seet ha t
. e c a l p k r o w a n i e m it s i h f o t s o m s d n e p s e ll i u o n e r
G He obeyst heproceduret ha t
g n o l s d n a m e
d -day process .He work sal ldayl ong t o ifnisht hist ask .“Grenouille
, d a e l f o s m r a d a
h callusesonhi shands ,andpainsi nhi sbacka shes taggeredback
. g n i n e v e e h t n i n i b a c s i h o
