List of Contents
Page
TITLE PAGE i
APPROVAL SHEET ii
STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT iv
ABSTRACT v
PREFACE vi
LIST OF CONTENTS vii
LIST OF FIGURES x
LIST OF TABLES xi
1.
Introduction
1
1.1 Background 1
1.2 Statements of the Problem 8
1.3 Objectives of the Study 8
1.4 Significance of the Study 8
1.5 Organization of the Study 9
2.
Theoretical Framework
10
2.1 Writing 10
2.1.2 Writing as a Process 13
2.2 Peer Feedback 15
2.2.1 The Philosophy of Peer Feedback 18
2.2.2 The Types of Peer Feedback 22
2.2.3 The Drawbacks in Peer Feedback 25
2.3 Peer Feedback in Writing 27
3.
Methodology
30
3.1 Research Design 30
3.2 Population and Samples 32
3.3 Research Instruments 33
3.3.1 Respondents’ Compositions 33
3.3.2 Questionnaire 34
3.3.3 Structured Interview 35
3.4 Data Analysis 35
3.4.1Quantitative Analysis 35
3.4.2Qualitative Analysis 36
3.5 Research Procedure 37
4.1.2 Discussion 47
4.2 Learners’ Perception on Peer Feedback 49
4.2.1 Findings and Analysis 50
4.2.2 Discussion 53
4.3 How Learners take their Peer’s Written Feedback 55
4.3.1 Findings and Analysis 55
4.3.2 Discussion 61
5.
Conclusions and Suggestions
64
5.1 Conclusions 64
5.2 Suggestions 67
Bibliography
70
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2.1.2.1 Writing Process Cycle 14
Figure 3.1.1 Concurrent Embedded Design 31
Figure 3.1.2 One-shot Case Study 31
Figure 3.4.1 Research Procedure 38
LIST OF TABLES
Table 4.1.1.1 Sample of Respondents’ Written Commentary 41 Feedback
Table 4.1.1.2 Types of Written Feedback 43
Table 4.1.1.3 Feedback Points 43
Table 4.1.1.4 Types of Revision 45
Table 4.2.1.1 Questionnaire Results on Learners’ Perception 50 of Peer Feedback
Table 4.2.1.2 Questionnaire Results on the benefits of 51
Peer Feedback
Table 4.2.1.3 Questionnaire Results on the Obstacles of 53
Peer Feedback
Table 4.3.1.1 Interview Results on the Effectiveness of 56
Peer Feedback
Table 4.3.1.2 Interview Results on Learners’ Preference 58
on the types of Peer Feedback
Table 4.3.1.3 Interview Results on Whether Learners’ 60
