• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

CONSULTANTS PROPOSAL CHECKLIST

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "CONSULTANTS PROPOSAL CHECKLIST"

Copied!
3
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

1

MINISTRY OF INFRASTRUCTURE – SECRETARY OF STATE OF PUBLIC WORKS

Directorate of Building & Urban Planning

RFP Consulting Services Evaluation – Qualification/Eligibility Checklist

RFP No.

RFP Name

New Construction of Regional Offices in

Ermera, Manufahi, Maliana and Oecusse

Evaluation

Date

Firm No.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Firm Name

Ref.

Check Item/Criteria

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1.3

Attendance: Pre-proposal meeting & site visit

1.12

Proposal Validity – 60 days

4.3

No. of TP copies (2)

4.4.

FP unopened & sufficiently

labeled

1.13a

Authenticated Certificate of Ownership

Authenticated Voters Cards

1.13b

Authenticated Business

Registration Certificate

1.13c

Authenticated last quarter tax

payment

1.13d

Written Power of Attorney

1.13e

Bank Statement for 3 months

before bid closing

1.13f

Authority of Bank References

1.13g

Similar contracts last three

years

1.13h

Declaration of litigation past three years

Enter “R” (Responsive) or “NR” (Not Responsive)

VERIFIED CORRECT

(2)

2

MINISTRY OF INFRASTRUCTURE – SECRETARY OF STATE OF PUBLIC WORKS

Directorate of Building & Urban Planning

RFP Consulting Services Evaluation – Technical Proposal Checklist

RFP No.

RFP Name

New Construction of Regional Offices in

Ermera, Manufahi, Maliana and Oecusse

Evaluation

Date

Firm No.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Firm Name

Form Check Item/Criteria

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

T1

TP Submission Form

T2

Consultants Organizational

Profile

T3

Consultant’s Experience

T4

Proposed Technical Approach

& Methodology

T5.1

Consultant’s Team

Composition & Staffing Assignment

T5.2

Consultant’s Staffing Schedule

T5.3

Consultant’s Works Program

T6

Curriculum Vitae – all proposed personnel

Insert in Table above: Form included – YES/NO?; Form contents – Satisfactory: S; Unsatisfactory: U >>>>>>> example: Yes/S; Yes/U; No/U Attach details of reasons for Form Contents Unsatisfactory

VERIFIED CORRECT

(3)

3

MINISTRY OF INFRASTRUCTURE – SECRETARY OF STATE OF PUBLIC WORKS

Directorate of Building & Urban Planning

RFP Consulting Services Evaluation – Financial Proposal Checklist

RFP No.

RFP Name

New Construction of Regional Offices in

Ermera, Manufahi, Maliana and Oecusse

Evaluation

Date

Firm No.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Firm Name

Form Check Item/Criteria

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

F1

Financial Proposal Submission Form

F2

Summary & Breakdown of Costs by Activity

F3

Breakdown of Remuneration & Reimbursable Expenses

Insert in Table above: Form included – YES/NO?; Form contents – Satisfactory: S; Unsatisfactory: U >>>>>>> example: Yes/S; Yes/U; No/U Attach details of reasons for Form Contents Unsatisfactory

VERIFIED CORRECT

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

The study, carried out in cooperation with the Directorate General of Water Resources Development (DGWRD), Ministry of Public Works, under the Lombok Island

The Ministry of Education and Culture, Directorate General of Higher Education, Hasanuddin University intends to prequalify contractors for the following works of Hasanuddin

Community, the government together with the Central Government (Directorate General of Cipta Karya of Public Works and Housing Ministry); Bank of South Sumatra and

Consultants who agree to such extension shall confirm that they maintain the availability of the technical staff submitted in the proposal and their financial proposal; consultants

3.3 INDONESIAN SPATIAL PLANNING UNDER THE NEW ORDER AND THE REFORM ORDER 24/1992 26/2007 Management Directorate General of Human Settlements of the Ministry of Public Works Ministry

The Technical Proposal should be placed in a sealed envelope and super scribed “Technical Proposal” for Appointment of India Now Content and Design Support Partner for IBEF Further,

3.3 INDONESIAN SPATIAL PLANNING UNDER THE NEW ORDER AND THE REFORM ORDER 24/1992 26/2007 Management Directorate General of Human Settlements of the Ministry of Public Works Ministry

This paper explores the implications of socio-technical infrastructure interdependencies for urban sustainability transitions in the