• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Kuesioner Penelitian

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Membagikan "Kuesioner Penelitian"

Copied!
30
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Lampiran 1

Kuesioner Penelitian

Hubungan Faktor Resiko dengan Terjadinya Nyeri Punggung Bawah

( Low Back Pain) Pada Tenaga Kerja Bongkar Muat (TKBM) Di Pelabuhan

Belawan Medan Tahun 2015

Nomor Responden

:

I. Faktor Personal

1. Umur

:

2. BB (berat badan)

:

3. TB (tinggi badan)

:

4. IMT (Indeks Masa Tubuh)

:

5. Masa kerja

:

6. Apakah anda seorang perokok?

a. Ya

b.Tidak

7. Berapa kali anda melakukan kegiatan olahraga dalam seminggu ?

1. Sering ( ≥ 3 kali sering )

2. Kadang ( 1- 2 kali seminggu )

3. Jarang ( 1- 3 kali sebulan )

8. Berapa lama anda bekerja dalam satu hari ?

a. ≥8 jam

b. < 8

(2)

Lampiran 1

II.

Faktor pekerjaan

1. Pengukuran beban kerja

Nama

Beban kerja

Ringan

(75 – 100 /

menit )

Sedang

(100 – 125 /

menit)

Berat

( 125 – 150 /

menit )

2. Pengukuran Sikap Kerja Dengan Metode REBA (Rapid Entry Body

Assesment)

Tabel A.

1. Pergerakan Leher

(3)

Lampiran 1

2. Pergerakan Punggung

Skor :

3. Pergerakan Kaki

(4)

Lampiran 1

Tabel. B

1. Pergerakan Lengan Atas

Skor :

2. Pergerakan Lengan Bawah

(5)

Lampiran 1

3. Pergerakan Pergelangan

Skor

:

TABEL SKOR REBA

1. Skor Tabel A

(6)

Lampiran 1

(7)

Lampiran 1

(8)

Sikap Kerja TKBM Pelabuhan Belawan

Keterangan sikap kerja :

1. Pergerakan leher 12

0

2. Pergerakan punggung 80

0

3. Pergerakan kaki 40

0

4. Pergerakan lengan atas 20

0

80

12

20

40◦

0◦

(9)

Keterangan sikap kerja :

1. Pergerakan punggung 60

0

2. Pergerakan kaki 40

0

3. Pergelangan lengan atas 20

0

60

40

(10)

Keterangan sikap kerja :

1. Pergerakan leher 15

0

2. Pergerakan punggung 80

0

3. Pergerakan kaki 60

0

4. Pergerakan lengan bawah 60

0

5. Pergerakan pergelangan 15

0

80

60

15

60

15

(11)

MASTER DATA

HUBUNGAN FAKTOR RESIKO DENGAN TERJADINYA NYERI PUNGGUNG BAWAH ( LOW BACK PAIN ) PADA

TENAGA KERJA BONGKAR MUAT ( TKBM ) DI PELABUHAN BELAWAN TAHUN 2015

No

.

Case

control

Umur Umurk

BB

TB

IMT

IMTK

Masa Masak

Rokok

Olahraga

Lama

denyutseb

denyutses beban

sikap

1

1

34

2

70

167

25

2

6

2

1

2

1

93

119

2

2

2

1

36

2

68

176

22

2

5

2

1

2

1

92

109

2

2

3

1

27

2

68

170

24

2

2

1

1

2

2

83

108

1

2

4

1

24

1

60

183

18

1

2

1

1

1

1

98

124

2

1

5

1

23

1

68

173

23

2

5

2

1

1

1

88

115

2

1

6

1

24

1

68

165

25

2

5

2

1

1

2

82

118

1

1

7

1

40

2

60

160

23

2

6

2

1

2

1

96

119

2

2

8

1

24

1

58

162

22

2

5

2

1

1

1

83

107

1

1

9

1

50

2

60

165

22

2

15

2

1

2

2

81

116

1

2

10

1

23

1

60

180

19

2

5

2

1

1

1

91

118

2

1

11

1

24

1

80

180

25

2

5

2

2

1

1

85

119

2

1

12

1

24

1

58

160

23

2

6

2

1

1

2

91

116

2

1

13

1

30

2

54

166

20

2

2

1

1

2

1

81

98

1

2

14

1

50

2

63

160

25

2

10

2

2

2

1

92

119

2

2

15

1

24

1

67

175

22

2

6

2

1

1

2

84

119

2

1

16

1

52

2

58

162

22

2

16

2

2

2

1

84

117

2

2

17

1

52

2

60

163

23

2

21

2

2

2

1

94

116

2

2

18

1

49

2

57

167

20

2

14

2

1

2

2

86

117

2

2

19

1

22

1

51

166

19

2

3

1

1

1

1

82

98

1

1

(12)

20

1

27

2

55

165

20

2

2

1

1

2

1

80

98

1

2

21

1

28

2

78

190

22

2

3

1

1

2

2

85

115

1

2

22

1

24

1

60

160

23

2

6

2

1

1

1

84

132

2

1

23

1

24

1

60

180

19

2

5

2

1

1

1

92

114

2

1

24

1

23

1

51

165

19

2

5

2

1

1

2

95

136

2

1

25

1

33

2

59

165

22

2

10

2

1

2

1

83

131

2

1

26

1

40

2

68

165

25

2

12

2

1

2

1

94

107

2

2

27

1

24

1

60

165

22

2

6

2

1

1

2

90

131

2

1

28

1

37

2

62

166

22

2

9

2

1

2

1

92

109

2

2

29

1

39

2

57

165

21

2

15

2

1

2

1

99

105

2

2

30

1

26

2

53

165

19

2

3

1

1

2

1

82

116

1

2

31

1

35

2

59

164

22

2

7

2

1

2

1

94

132

2

2

32

1

24

1

67

166

24

2

6

2

1

1

1

89

130

2

1

33

2

24

1

65

163

24

2

5

2

1

1

1

95

116

2

1

34

2

36

2

64

170

22

2

9

2

1

2

1

83

118

2

2

35

2

29

2

50

165

18

1

8

2

1

2

1

85

93

2

2

36

2

24

1

60

170

21

2

6

2

1

1

1

88

132

2

1

37

2

21

1

65

170

22

2

2

1

1

1

1

82

98

1

1

38

2

53

2

68

170

24

2

30

2

1

2

1

84

131

2

2

39

2

24

1

63

160

24

2

6

2

1

1

1

82

132

2

1

40

2

23

1

58

162

22

2

5

2

1

1

1

85

132

2

1

41

2

23

1

61

164

23

2

2

1

1

1

1

82

100

1

1

42

2

23

1

61

173

20

2

5

2

1

1

1

82

131

2

1

43

2

24

1

52

167

19

2

6

2

1

1

1

91

118

2

1

44

2

19

1

60

160

23

2

2

1

1

1

1

84

110

1

1

45

2

23

1

53

165

19

2

3

1

1

1

82

116

1

1

46

2

24

1

51

160

20

2

6

2

1

1

2

92

131

2

1

(13)

47

2

37

2

65

170

22

2

8

2

1

2

1

80

131

2 2

48

2

23

1

52

170

18

1

5

2

1

1

1

93

119

2

1

49

2

24

1

60

163

23

2

5

2

1

1

1

83

119

2

1

50

2

23

1

56

165

21

2

5

2

1

1

1

80

92

1

1

51

2

50

2

50

163

19

2

15

2

1

2

1

78

110

1

2

52

2

26

2

50

161

19

2

3

1

1

2

2

83

110

1

2

53

2

23

1

60

160

20

2

2

1

2

1

1

81

100

1

1

54

2

29

2

65

160

23

2

3

1

1

2

1

84

90

1

2

55

2

24

1

54

170

22

2

3

1

1

1

1

62

91

1

1

56

2

22

1

53

168

19

2

3

1

2

1

1

80

90

1

1

57

2

24

1

52

169

19

2

2

1

2

1

1

75

84

1

1

58

2

22

1

56

170

18

1

2

1

1

1

2

80

97

1

1

59

2

21

1

50

170

19

2

3

1

1

1

1

80

81

1

1

60

2

23

1

58

163

19

2

3

1

1

1

1

81

98

1

1

61

2

24

1

58

160

23

2

1

1

1

1

1

83

108

1

1

62

2

22

1

59

170

20

2

1

1

1

1

1

85

99

1

1

63

2

23

1

60

172

20

2

3

1

1

1

1

82

118

1

1

64

2

26

2

49

162

19

2

2

1

1

2

1

85

119

2

2

(14)

Umur TKBM * Low Back Pain

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Umurk * Low Back Pain 64 54.2% 54 45.8% 118 100.0%

Umurk * Low Back Pain Crosstabulation

Low Back Pain

Total

Case Control

Umurk 1 Count 14 24 38

% within Umurk 36.8% 63.2% 100.0%

% within Low Back Pain 43.8% 75.0% 59.4%

% of Total 21.9% 37.5% 59.4%

2 Count 18 8 26

% within Umurk 69.2% 30.8% 100.0%

% within Low Back Pain 56.2% 25.0% 40.6%

% of Total 28.1% 12.5% 40.6%

Total Count 32 32 64

% within Umurk 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

% within Low Back Pain 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Umurk (1 / 2) .259 .090 .750

For cohort Low Back Pain =

(15)

For cohort Low Back Pain =

Control 2.053 1.098 3.837

N of Valid Cases 64

IMT TKBM * Low Back Pain

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

IMTK * Low Back Pain 64 54.2% 54 45.8% 118 100.0%

IMTK * Low Back Pain Crosstabulation

Low Back Pain

Total

Case Control

IMTK < 18.4 Count 1 3 4

% within IMTK 25.0% 75.0% 100.0%

% within Low Back Pain 3.1% 9.4% 6.2%

% of Total 1.6% 4.7% 6.2%

18.5 - 25.0 Count 31 29 60

% within IMTK 51.7% 48.3% 100.0%

% within Low Back Pain 96.9% 90.6% 93.8%

% of Total 48.4% 45.3% 93.8%

Total Count 32 32 64

% within IMTK 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

% within Low Back Pain 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

(16)

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for IMTK (< 18.4

/ 18.5 - 25.0) .312 .031 3.170

For cohort Low Back Pain = Case

.484 .087 2.689

For cohort Low Back Pain =

Control 1.552 .832 2.894

N of Valid Cases 64

Masa Kerja TKBM *Low Back Pain

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Masak * Low Back Pain 64 54.2% 54 45.8% 118 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests Value Df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig.

(1-sided) Point Probability

Pearson Chi-Square 1.067a 1 .302 .613 .306

Continuity Correctionb .267 1 .606

Likelihood Ratio 1.113 1 .291 .613 .306

Fisher's Exact Test .613 .306

Linear-by-Linear Association 1.050c 1 .306 .613 .306 .250

N of Valid Cases 64

a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.00. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

(17)

Masak * Low Back Pain Crosstabulation

Low Back Pain

Total

Case Control

Masak <4 Count 7 17 24

% within Masak 29.2% 70.8% 100.0%

% within Low Back Pain 21.9% 53.1% 37.5%

% of Total 10.9% 26.6% 37.5%

>4 Count 25 15 40

% within Masak 62.5% 37.5% 100.0%

% within Low Back Pain 78.1% 46.9% 62.5%

% of Total 39.1% 23.4% 62.5%

Total Count 32 32 64

% within Masak 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

% within Low Back Pain 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Value Df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig.

(1-sided) Point Probability

Pearson Chi-Square 6.667a 1 .010 .019 .010

Continuity Correctionb 5.400 1 .020

Likelihood Ratio 6.823 1 .009 .019 .010

Fisher's Exact Test .019 .010

Linear-by-Linear Association 6.562c 1 .010 .019 .010 .008

N of Valid Cases 64

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12.00. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

(18)

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Masak (<4 /

>4) .247 .083 .734

For cohort Low Back Pain =

Case .467 .239 .910

For cohort Low Back Pain =

Control 1.889 1.174 3.038

N of Valid Cases 64

Kebiasaan Merokok TKBM * Low Back Pain

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Rokok * Low Back Pain 64 54.2% 54 45.8% 118 100.0%

Rokok * Low Back Pain Crosstabulation

Low Back Pain

Total

Case Control

Rokok Ya Count 28 29 57

% within Rokok 49.1% 50.9% 100.0%

% within Low Back Pain 87.5% 90.6% 89.1%

% of Total 43.8% 45.3% 89.1%

Tidak Count 4 3 7

% within Rokok 57.1% 42.9% 100.0%

% within Low Back Pain 12.5% 9.4% 10.9%

(19)

Total Count 32 32 64

% within Rokok 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

% within Low Back Pain 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Rokok (Ya /

Tidak) .724 .148 3.531

For cohort Low Back Pain =

Case .860 .430 1.720

For cohort Low Back Pain =

Control 1.187 .486 2.898 N of Valid Cases 64 Chi-Square Tests Value Df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig.

(1-sided) Point Probability

Pearson Chi-Square .160a 1 .689 1.000 .500

Continuity Correctionb .000 1 1.000

Likelihood Ratio .161 1 .688 1.000 .500

Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .500

Linear-by-Linear Association .158c 1 .691 1.000 .500 .287

N of Valid Cases 64

a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.50. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

(20)

Kebiasaan Olahraga TKBM * Low Back Pain

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Olahraga * Low Back Pain 64 54.2% 54 45.8% 118 100.0%

Olahraga * Low Back Pain Crosstabulation

Low Back Pain

Total

Case Control

Olahraga Sering Count 14 24 38

% within Olahraga 36.8% 63.2% 100.0%

% within Low Back Pain 43.8% 75.0% 59.4%

% of Total 21.9% 37.5% 59.4%

Jarang Count 18 8 26

% within Olahraga 69.2% 30.8% 100.0%

% within Low Back Pain 56.2% 25.0% 40.6%

% of Total 28.1% 12.5% 40.6%

Total Count 32 32 64

% within Olahraga 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

% within Low Back Pain 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

(21)

Chi-Square Tests Value Df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig.

(1-sided) Point Probability

Pearson Chi-Square 6.478a 1 .011 .021 .011

Continuity Correctionb 5.247 1 .022

Likelihood Ratio 6.610 1 .010 .021 .011

Fisher's Exact Test .021 .011

Linear-by-Linear Association 6.377c 1 .012 .021 .011 .008

N of Valid Cases 64

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13.00. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

c. The standardized statistic is -2.525.

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Olahraga

(Sering / Jarang) .259 .090 .750

For cohort Low Back Pain =

Case .532 .326 .868

For cohort Low Back Pain =

Control 2.053 1.098 3.837

(22)

Lama Kerja TKBM * Low Back Pain

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Lama * Low Back Pain 64 54.2% 54 45.8% 118 100.0%

Lama * Low Back Pain Crosstabulation

Low Back Pain

Total

Case Control

Lama < 8 jam Count 3 2 5

% within Lama 60.0% 40.0% 100.0%

% within Low Back Pain 9.4% 6.2% 7.8%

% of Total 4.7% 3.1% 7.8%

> 8 jam Count 29 30 59

% within Lama 49.2% 50.8% 100.0%

% within Low Back Pain 90.6% 93.8% 92.2%

% of Total 45.3% 46.9% 92.2%

Total Count 32 32 64

% within Lama 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

% within Low Back Pain 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

(23)

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Lama (< 8

jam / > 8 jam) 1.552 .241 9.974

For cohort Low Back Pain =

Case 1.221 .570 2.614

For cohort Low Back Pain =

Control .787 .261 2.369

N of Valid Cases 64

Beban Kerja TKBM *Low Back Pain

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

bebankerja * Low Back Pain 64 54.2% 54 45.8% 118 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig.

(1-sided) Point Probability

Pearson Chi-Square .217a 1 .641 1.000 .500

Continuity Correctionb .000 1 1.000

Likelihood Ratio .218 1 .640 1.000 .500

Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .500

Linear-by-Linear Association .214c 1 .644 1.000 .500 .323

N of Valid Cases 64

a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.50. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

(24)

bebankerja * Low Back Pain Crosstabulation

Low Back Pain

Total

Case Control

bebankerja Ringan Count 9 18 27

% within bebankerja 33.3% 66.7% 100.0%

% within Low Back Pain 28.1% 56.2% 42.2%

% of Total 14.1% 28.1% 42.2%

Sedang Count 23 14 37

% within bebankerja 62.2% 37.8% 100.0%

% within Low Back Pain 71.9% 43.8% 57.8%

% of Total 35.9% 21.9% 57.8%

Total Count 32 32 64

% within bebankerja 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

% within Low Back Pain 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Value Df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig.

(1-sided) Point Probability

Pearson Chi-Square 5.189a 1 .023 .042 .021

Continuity Correctionb 4.100 1 .043

Likelihood Ratio 5.269 1 .022 .042 .021

Fisher's Exact Test .042 .021

Linear-by-Linear Association 5.108c 1 .024 .042 .021 .016

N of Valid Cases 64

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13.50. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

(25)

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for bebankerja

(Ringan / sedang) .304 .108 .861

For cohort Low Back Pain =

Case .536 .297 .967

For cohort Low Back Pain =

Control 1.762 1.078 2.881

N of Valid Cases 64

Sikap Kerja TKBM * Low Back Pain

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Sikap * Low Back Pain 64 54.2% 54 45.8% 118 100.0%

Sikap * Low Back Pain Crosstabulation

Low Back Pain

Total

Case Control

Sikap sedang Count 15 24 39

% within Sikap 38.5% 61.5% 100.0%

% within Low Back Pain 46.9% 75.0% 60.9%

% of Total 23.4% 37.5% 60.9%

tinggi Count 17 8 25

% within Sikap 68.0% 32.0% 100.0%

(26)

% of Total 26.6% 12.5% 39.1%

Total Count 32 32 64

% within Sikap 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

% within Low Back Pain 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Sikap (sedang / tinggi)

.294 .102 .848

For cohort Low Back Pain =

Case .566 .350 .914

For cohort Low Back Pain =

Control 1.923 1.031 3.585

(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)

Gambar

TABEL SKOR REBA  1. Skor Tabel A

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

4.1.1 Kesulitan belajar membaca Al-Qur’an yang dialami siswa kelas VIII SMP Muhammadiyah 1 Surakarta tahun 2017 ada beberapa macam, diantaranya yaitu:

Pelaksanaan pembelajaran menulis teks laporan hasil observasi berbasis kearifan lokal yang dilakukan oleh guru bahasa Indonesia di kelas VII A4 SMPNegeri 1

dengan pendidikan yang ada diperguruan tinggi, kecuali memang mereka cepat dalam memnyesuaikan diri terhadap hal baru dan pelajaran yang terdapat diperguruan tinggi.Menurut Lawton

Kajian ini dijalankan bertujuan untuk menganalisis proses adaptasi antarabudaya pelajar Melayu di Australia dan United Kingdom sewaktu melanjutkan pengajian mereka ke

267 RIAN HIDAYAT DESAIN KOMUNIKASI VISUAL (DKV) LULUS. 268 RIDHA NURAZIZAH

Pemberian tekanan penguasaan materi akibat perubahan dalam diri siswa setelah belajar diberikan oleh Soedijarto yang mendefinisikan hasil belajar sebagai tingkat penguasaan

Nilai signifikansi yang besarnya di bawah 0,05 mengindikasikan adanya hubungan yang signifikan antara religiusitas dan tingkat kecemasan mahasiswa tingkat akhir

Tujuan penel itian ini adalah untuk mempelajari karakteristik teknologik dari bahan cetak langsung massa granul dari granulatum laktosi yang telah dimodifikasi