LAMPIRAN I PRELIMINAR Y RESEARCH

(1)

47

LAMPIRAN I

PRELIMINAR Y RESEARCH

(2)

Kami adalah mahasiswi UK. Petra sedang menjalankan tugas akhir dimana metode penelitian kami menggunakan Eksperimen, oleh karena itu kami membutuhkan bantuan kalian untuk mengisi pertanyaan sebagai berikut,

Berikan 10 atribut ( kriteria) yang harus ada pada sabun kecantikan ( sabun batang):

I 2.

3.

4.

5.

6 7.

8.

9.

10.

Terima kasih atas partisipasi anda dalam pengisian kuisioner ini. Tuhan memberkati.

(3)

49

LAMPIRAN II

KUISIONER

(4)

50 Salam sejahtera,

Terima kasih atas kesediaan saudari.untuk meluangkan waktu dalam eksperimen penelitian kami ini.Berikut adalah kuisioner tentang Perceived Quality.Dan setiap informasi yang saudari berikan dijamin kerahasiaannya dan untuk semata-mata untuk kegiatan keilmuan oleh karena itu sangat diharapkan kejujuran saudari dalam mengisi kuisioner ini,serta atas segala kesediaan dan kejujurannya kami ucapkan terimakasih yang sebesar-besarnya.

Terima kasih.(Fenny Poniman dan Ivonne P. Y).

]

Inisial:

Kelompok Usia

Tingkat Pendidikan

[DENTITAS RESPONDEN

1 Menurut Anda ,dengan kemasan seperti yang anda lihat ,bagaimanakah kualitas sabun tersebut ?

No 1

2

3

Pernyataan Tingkat Keharuman

Tingkat Manfaat bagi Kulit (Melembabkan ,Menghaluskan

,Mengandung Vitamin, Membersihkan seluruh tubuh, Memutihkan, Teruji klinis) Bentuk Sabun

Penilaian

Sangat 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Sangat

Buruk Baik Sangat 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Sangat

Buruk Baik

(5)

51 4

5

6

7

Warna Sabun

Bahan Pembuat Sabun

Ketahanan Sabun

Tingkat Kegunaan Sabun

Buruk Baik Sangat 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Sangat

Buruk Baik

(6)

52

LAMPIRAN HI

TABULASI HASIL EKSPERIMEN

(7)

Tabulasi Hasil Eksperimen Tinqkat Keharuman

Kelompok E1

Responden 1 2 3 4 5

Penilaian 7 7 4 7 5

Tinqkat Manfaat Kelompok

E1

Responden 1 2 3 4 5

Penilaian 6 6 4 5 5 Kelompok

E2

Responden 1 2 3 4 5

Penilaian 5 5 5 7 6

Kelompok E2

Responden 1 2 3 4 5

E3

Responden 1 2 3 4 5

Penilaian 7 5 5 4 5

Kelompok E3

Responden 1 2 3 4 5

E4

Responden 1 2 3 4 5

Penilaian 7 5 5 5 4

Kelompok E4

Responden 1 2 3 4 5

E5

Responden 1 2 3 4 5

Penilaian 5 5 5 5 5

Kelompok E5

Responden 1 2 3 4 5

E6

Responden 1 2

•'3 4 5

Penilaian 4 5 5 7 3

Kelompok E6

Responden 1 2 3 4 5

K

Responden 1 2 3 • 4 5

Penilaian 3 1 1 4 6

Kelompok K

Responden 1 2 3 4 5

Penilaian 5 1 1 6 5

(8)

Tabulasi Hasil Eksperimen

Bahan Pembuat Sabun Ketahanan Sabun

Kelompok E1

Responden 1 2 3 4 5 Kelompok

E2

E3

E4

E5

E6

K

Responden 1 2 3 - 4

Penilaian 4 5 4 6 7 Penilaian

6 6 5 4 6 Penilaian

5 5 5 5 3 Penilaian

5 5 6 4 5 Penilaian

6 5 4 3 3 Penilaian

5 5 5 7 6 Penilaian

6 1 1 6 3

Kelompok E1

Responden 1 2 3 4 5

E2

Responden 1 2 3 4 5

E3

Responden 1 2 3 4 5

E4

Responden 1 2 3 4 5

E5

Responden 1 2 3 4 5

E6

Responden 1 2 3 4 5

K

Responden 1 2 3 4 5

Penilaian 4 3 1 4

(9)

Tabulasi Hasil Eksperimen

Bentuk Sabun Warna Sabun

Kelompok E1

Responden 1 2 3 4 5

E2

Responden 1 2 3 4 5

E3

Responden 1 2 3 4 5

E4

Responden 1 2 3 4 5

E5

Responden 1 2 3 4 5

E6

Responden 1 2 3 4 5

Penilaian 3 4 o«

4 6 Kelompok

K

Responden 1 2 3 4 5

Penilaian 5 1 5 5 2

Kelompok E1

Responden 1 2 3 4 5

E2

Responden 1 2 3 4 5

E3

Responden 1 2 3 4 5

E4

Responden 1 2 3 4 5

E5

Responden 1 2 3 4 5

E6

Responden 1 2 3 4 5

K

Responden 1 2 3 4 5

Penilaian 5 2 2 6 3

(10)

Tinqkat Kequnaan Sabun Kelompok

E1

Responden 1 2 3 4 5

E2

Responden 1 2 3 4 5

E3

Responden 1 2 3 4 5

E4

Responden 1 2 3 4 5

E5

Responden 1 2 3 4 5

E6

Responden 1 2 3 4 5

K

Responden 1 2 3 - 4

Penilaian 3 4 5 6 3

(11)

57

LAMPIRAN IV

TABEL DISKRIMINAN

(12)

Skripsi.sav

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35

kklompok .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00

harum 3.00

1.00 1.00 4.00 6.00 7.00 7.00 4.00 7.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 7.00 6.00 7.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 5.00 7.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 7.00 3.00

manfaat 5.00 1.00 1.00 6.00 5.00 6.00 6.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 6.00 5.00 7.00 7.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 7.00 5.00 5.00 6.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00

bentuk 5.00 1.00 5.00 5.00 2.00 6.00 6.00 5.00 7.00 6.00 4.00 4.00 6.00 7.00 5.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 2.00 3.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 6.00 3.00 4.00 2.00 4.00 6.00

wama 5.00 2.00 2.00 6.00 3.00 4.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 6.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 6.00 5.00 6.00 5.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 5.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 3.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 2.00 4.00 3.00 4.00 3.00 7.00 5.00

bahan 6.00

1.0Q 1.06 6.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 4.00 6.00 7.00 6.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 3.00 5.00 5.00 6.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 7.00 6.00

tahan 4.00 3.00 1.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 6.00 4.00 5.00 4.00 4.00 7.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 4.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 7.00 5.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 6.00 4.00 5.00 5 00 5.00

(13)

Ivonne's.sav

59

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 3i

guna 3.00 4 00 5.00 6.00 3.00 6.00 6.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 7.00 5.00 6.00 6.00 7.00 7.00 6.00 6.00 4.00 4.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 6.00 6.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 i 6.00

12/09/03 01:57:20 PM

(14)

Discriminant

Analysis Case Processing Summary Unweighted

Cases Valid Excluded

Total

Missing or out-of-range group codes At least one missing discriminating variable Both missing or out-of-range group codes and at least one missing discriminating

variable Total

N 35 0 0 0

0 35

Percent 100,C

,0 ,0 ,0

,o

100,C

Group Statistics

KELOMPOK ,00

1,00

2,00

MANFAA7 BENTUK WARNA BAHAN TAHAN GUNA HARUM MANFAA1 BENTUK WARNA BAHAN TAHAN GUNA HARUM MANFAA1 BENTUK WARNA BAHAN TAHAN GUNA HARUM

Valid N (listwise) Unweighted 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

Weighted 5,000 5,00C 5,00C 5.00C 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000

(15)

3,00

4,00

5,00

6,00

Total

MANFAAT BENTUK\

WARNA BAHAN TAHAN GUNA HARUM MANFAAT BENTUK WARNA BAHAN TAHAN GUNA HARUM MANFAAT BENTUK WARNA BAHAN TAHAN GUNA HARUM MANFAAT BENTUK WARNA BAHAN TAHAN GUNA HARUM MANFAAT BENTUK WARNA BAHAN TAHAN GUNA HARUM

5

~3

5 5 5 5 5 5 5

_ ^

5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 35 35 35 35 35 35 35

5,000 5,000 5,00C 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000

(16)

Tests of Equality of Group Means

62

MANFAAT BENTUK WARNA BAHAN TAHAN GUNA HARUIVI

Wilks Lambda ,651 ,665 ,816 ,739 ,710 ,720 ,635

F 2,503 2,352 1,051 1,646 1,906 1,814

df1 6 6 6 6 6 6

2,683 6 df2

28 26 28 28 28 28 28

Sig.

,046 ,056 ,414 ,172 ,115 ,132 ,035

Pooled Within-GrouDS Matrices

Correlation MANFAAT BENTUK WARNA BAHAN TAHAN GUNA HARUM

MANFAAT 1,000

,353 ,506 ,372 ,137 ,219 ,659

BENTUK ,353 1,000

,459 ,316 -,101 ,529 ,244

WARNA ,506 ,459 1,000 ,562 ,378 ,388 ,406

BAHAN TAHAN GUNA ,372

,316 ,562 1,000

,560 ,276 ,241

,137 -,101 ,378 ,560 1,000 ,171 ,129

,219 ,529 ,388 ,276 ,171 1,000

,242

HARUM ,659 ,244 ,406 ,241 ,129 ,242 1,006

Analysis 1

Stepwise Statistics

Variables Entered/Removed Step

At each step, the variable that maximizes the Mahalanobis distance between the two closest groups is entered,

a Maximum number of steps is 14.

b Minimum partial F to enter is 3.84.

c Maximum partial F to remove is 2.71.

d F level, tolerance, or VIN insufficient for further computation, e No variables are qualified for the analysis.

(17)

63

Variables in the Analysis Step

Variables Not in the Analysis Step

0 MANFAA1 BENTUK WARNA BAHAN TAHAN GUNA HARUM

Tolerance 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000

Min.

Tolerance 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000

Fto Enter 2,503 2,352 1,051 1,646 1,906 1,814 2,683]

Min. D Between Groups Squared

,000 ,022 ,000 ,022 ,000 ,035 ,000

1,00 and 4,00 ,00 and 6, OC 1,00 and 4,00 2,00 and 6, OC 2,00 and 4, OC

1,00 and 3,0C 3,00 and 4, OC

Wilks' Lambda Step

a No variables are qualified for the analysis.

Discriminant

Analysis Case Processing Summary Unweighted

Cases Valid Excluded

Total

Missing or out-of-range group codes At least one missing discriminating variable Both missing or out-of-range

group codes and at least one missing discriminating

variable Total

N 35 0 0 0

0 35

Percent 100,C

,0 ,0 ,0

,c

100,C

(18)

Group Statistics

KELOMPOK

,oc

1,00

2,00

3,00

4,00

5,00

MANFAAi BENTUK

WARNA BAHAN TAHAN GUNA HARUM MANFAAI

BENTUK WARNA BAHAN TAHAN GUNA HARUM MANFAAI

BENTUK WARNA BAHAN TAHAN GUNA

Valid N (listwise) Unweighted

5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

Weightea 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000

(19)

6,00

Totai

HARUM MANFAAT BENTUK WARNA BAHAN TAHAN GUNA HARUM MANFAAT BENTUK WARNA BAHAN TAHAN GUNA HARUM

5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 35 35 35 35 35 3^

35

5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 Group Statistics

KELOMPOK ,00

1,00

2,00

3,00

MANFAAT BENTUK WARNA BAHAN TAHAN GUNA HARUM MANFAAT BENTUK WARNA BAHAN TAHAN GUNA HARUM MANFAAT BENTUK WARNA BAHAN TAHAN GUNA HARUM MANFAAT BENTUK WARNA

Valid N (listwise) Unweighted 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

Weighted 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000

(20)

4,00

5,00^

6,00

Total

BAHAM TAHAN GUNA HARUM MANFAAT BENTUK WARNA BAHAN TAHAN GUNA HARUM MANFAAT BENTUK WARNA BAHAN TAHAN GUNA HARUM MANFAAT BENTUK WARNA BAHAN TAHAN GUNA HARUM MANFAAT BENTUK WARNA BAHAN TAHAN GUNA HARUM

5 5 5

~ 5 5 5

~ 5

~5 5 3 3 5 5 5 _§

5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 35 35 35 35 35 35 35

5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,00C 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000

Tests of Equality of Group Means

MANFAAT BENTUK WARNA BAHAN TAHAN GUNA HARUM

Wilks Lambda ,651 ,665 ,816 ,739 ,710 ,720 ,635

F 2,503 2,352 1,051 1,646 1,906 1,814 2,683

df1 6 6

~i

~$

6 6 6

df2 Sig.

26 ,046 28 ,056 28 ,414 28\ ,172 28

28 28

.115 ,132 ,035

(21)

67

Pooled Within-Groups Matrices

Correlation MANFAA1 BENTUK WARNA BAHAN TAHAN GUNA HARUM

MANFAAT 1,000

,353 ,506 ,372 .137 ,219 ,659

BENTUK ,353 1,000 ,459 ,316 -,101 ,529 ,244

WARNA BAHAN ,506

,459 1,000

,562 ,378 ,388 ,406

,372 ,316 ,562 1,000 ,560 ,276 .241

TAHAN GUN AH ARUM .137

-,101 ,378 ,560 1,000 .171 ,129

,219 ,529 ,388 ,276 ,171 1,000 ,242

,659 ,244 ,406 ,241 ,129 ,242 1.00C

Analysis 1

Stepwise Statistics

Variables Entered/Removed

Step 1

Entered

MANFAAT

Min.D Squared

Statistic

,000

Between Groups 1,00 and

4,00

Exact F Statistic

,000 dfl

1

df2 28,000

Sig.

1,000 At each step, the variable that maximizes the Mahalanobis distance between the two closest groups is entered.

a Maximum number of steps is 14.

b Maximum significance ofF to enter is .05.

c Minimum significance ofFto remove is . 10.

d F level, tolerance, or VIN insufficient for further computation.

Variables in the Analysis

Step Tolerance Sig. of F to Remove

MANFAA1 1,000 ,046

(22)

68

Variables Not in the Analysis

Sfejb 0

1

MANFAAT BENTUK WARNA BAHAN TAHAN GUNA HARUM BENTUK WARNA BAHAN TAHAN GUNA HARUM

Tolerance 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 ,875 ,744 ,862 ,981 ,952 ,566

Min.

Tolerance 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 ,875 ,744 ,862 ,981 ,952 ,566

Sig. ofFto Enter

,046 ,058 ,414 ,172 ,115 ,132 ,035 ,060 ,573 ,692 ,278 ,344 ,052

Min. D Squared ,000 ,022 ,000 ,022 ,000 ,035 ,000 ,036 ,000 ,026 ,069 ,051 ,097

Between Groups 1,00 anc 4,00 ,00and6,0C

1,00 and 4,00 2,00 anc 6,00 2,00 and 4,00 1,00 and 3,00 3,00 and 4,00 4,00 anc 6,00 1,00 and 4,00 1,00 ana 4,00 4,00 and 6,00 1,00 and

6,00 4,00 and 6,00\

Wilks' Lambda

Step 1

Number

0/

Variables

1

Lambda

,651

df1

1

df2

6

df3

28

Exact F Statist ic 2,503

df1 6

df2 28,00 0

Sig.

4,576E- 02

(23)

69

Pairwise Group Comparisons Step

1

KELOMPOK ,00

1,00

2,00

3,00

4,00

5,00

6,00 F Sig F Sigl

F Sig F Sig F Sig F Sig F Sig

.OC

4,226 ,049 9,509

,005 ,594 ,447 4,226 ,049 ,066 ,799 3,236 ,083

1,00 4,226

,049

1,057 ,313 1,651

,209 ,000 1,000 3,236

,083 ,066 ,799

2,00 9,509 ,005 1,057

,313

5,349 ,028 1,057

,313 7,991 ,009 1,651

,209

3,00 ,594 ,447 1,651

,209 5,349

,028

1,651 ,209 ,264 ,611 1,057

,313

4,00 4,226 ,049 ,000 1,000 1,057 ,313 1,651

,209

3,236 ,083 ,066 ,799

5,00 ,066 ,799 3,236 ,083 7,991 ,009 ,264 ,611 3,236 ,083

2,377 ,134

6,0C 3,236 ,083 ,066 ,799 1,651

,209 1,057

,313 ,066 ,799 2,377 ,134

a 1, 28 degrees of freedom for step 1.

Summary of Canonical Discriminant Functions

Eigenvalues Function

J

Eigenvalue .536,

%0l Variance

100,0

Cumulative

%

100,0

Canonical Correlation ,591 a First 1 canonical discriminant functions were used in the analysis.

•

!

(24)

Wilks' Lambda

70

Test ol Function(s) 1

Wilks'Lambda Chi-square ,651

dl 12,883 8

Sig.

,045

Standardized Canonical Discriminant Function Coefficients

MANFAAT

Function 1 1,000 Structure Matrix

MANFAAT HARUM WARNA BAHAN BENTUK GUNA TAHAN

Function 1 1,000 ,659 ,506 ,372 ,353 ,219 ,137

Pooled within-groups correlations between discriminating variables and standardized canonical discriminant functions Variables ordered by absolute size of correlation within function,

a This variable not used in the analysis.

Canonical Discriminant Function Coefficients

MANFAAT (Constant)

Function 1 ,813 -3,831 Unstandardized coefficients

(25)

Functions at Group Centroids

KELOMPOK ,00 1,00 2,00 3,00 4,00 5,00 6,00

Function 1 -,906 ,395 1,045 -,41S ,395 -,743 ,232

Unstandardized canonical discriminant functions evaluated at group means

Classification Statistics

Classification Processing Summary Processea

Excluded

Used in Output

Missing or out-of- range group codes At least one missing discriminating variable

35 0 0

35

Pn'or Probabilities for Groups

KELOMPOK .00 1,00 2,00 3,00 4,00 5,00 6,00 Total

Prior ,143 .143 ,143 .143 ,143 ,143 ,143 1,000

Cases Used in Analysis Unweighted

5 5

~ ^

5 5 5 5 35

Weighted 5,00C 5,00C 5,00C 5,00C 5,00C 5,00C 5,00C 35.00C

(26)

72

Casewise Statistics

Original

Case Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

a

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Actual Group

C C C C C

7 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3

Highest Group Predicte d Group

6 0 0 2 6 2 2 3 6 6 2 6 2 2 6 6 3 3

3 3

n

4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 6

3 2 6 6 2 0 0 3 6 0 3 6

P(D>d | G=g)

P 1,000 ,035 ,035 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 ,871 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 ,416 ,416 1,000 1,000 ,871 ,871 ,871 ,871 ,416 1,000 1,000 1,000 ,626 ,626 ,871 1,000 ,626 ,871 1,000

dt

1 1 1 1

^t

M

P(G=g | D=d)

177 471 471 248 177 248 248 192 177 177 248 177 399 399 177 177 192 192 192 192 399 177 177 248 292 292 192 177 292 192 177

Squared Mahalan obis Distance to Centroid

,000 4,464 4,464 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,026 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,660 ,660 ,000 ,000 ,026 ,026 ,026 ,026 ,660 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,238 ,238 ,026 ,000 ,238 ,026 ,000

Discriminant Scores Function 1

,232 -3,016 -3,016 1,041 ,232 1,045 1,045 -,58C ,232 ,232 1,045 ,232 1,857 1,857 ,232 ,232 -,58C -,58C -.580 -,58C 1,857 ,232 ,232 1,045 -1,393 -1,393 -,58C ,232 -1,393 -,58C

,232

(27)

73

Cross- validated

32 33 34 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35

6 6 6 6 C C

c c c

•J

2 2 2 2 2

6 6 6 6 6 5 5 2 6 2 2 3 6 6 2 6 2 2 6

3 6 3 5 3\ 5

^

£

4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6

5 5 2 6 6 2 0 0 3 6 0 3 6 6 6 6 6

1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 ,013 ,013 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 ,870 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 ,311 ,311 1,000 1,000 ,873 ,873 ,873 ,873 ,401 1,000 1,000 1,000 ,605 ,629 ,873 1,000

,629 ,873 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000

1

4

1

A

1

4

,177 177 177 177 183 554 554 269 183 252 252 198 176 176 245 181 354 354 181 179 190 190 190 190 456 176 176 252 320 298 190 182 298 190 176 176 176 176 176

,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 6,235 6,235 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,027 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,025 1,025 ,000 ,000 ,026 ,026 ,026 ,026 ,704 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,267 ,234 ,026 ,000 ,234 ,026 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000

,232 ,232 ,232 ,232

•

(28)

74

Second Highest Group Group

1 5 5

5

c 1 e

c 1 1 1 1

%

J f

1

<

«

•

*

•

• 1

P(G=g | D=d)

,175 ,330 ,33C ,201 ,175 ,201 ,201 ,192 ,175 ,175 ,201 ,175 ,190 ,190 ,175 ,175 ,192 ,192 ,192 ,192 ,190 ,175 ,175 ,201 i ,266 i ,26t i ,192

,171

-•> ,26t

-•> ,192 ' ,171

\ ,17i I ,171 f ,171

\ ,171

Squarec Mahalanobis Distance to

Centroid ,026 5,177 5,177 ,423 ,026 ,423 ,423 ,026 ,026 ,026 ,423 ,026 2,140 2,140 ,026 ,026 ,026 ,026 ,026 ,026 2,140 ,026 ,026 ,423 ,423 ,423 ,026 ,026

i ,423 ,026

i ,026 i ,026

\ ,026 i ,026

5 ,026

? ,181 ,027

(29)

4 4

3

2 5

_3

6

~~t

5 2 2 2 2

3

2 ₄ 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 6 6 6 2 6 6 2 2 2 2 2

,213 ,213 ,210 ,181 ,205 ,205 ,198 ,174 ,174 ,199 ,178 ,204 ,204 ,178 ,177 ,189 ,189 ,189 ,189 ,207 ,174 ,174 ,205 ,288 ,242 ,189 ,180 ,242 ,189 ,174 ,174 ,174 ,174 ,174

8,144 8,144 ,491 ,027 ,415 ,415 ,027 ,026 ,026 ,408 ,026 2,126 2,126 ,026 ,026 ,040 ,04C ,04C ,04C 2,281

,026 ,026 ,415 ,475 ,649 ,046 ,027 ,649 ,046 ,025 ,025 ,025 ,025 ,025

For the original data, squared Mahalanobis distance is based on canonical functions. For the cross-validated data, squared Mahalanobis distance is based on observations.

** Misclassified case

a Cross validation is done only for those cases in the analysis. In cross

validation, each case is classified by the functions derived from all cases other than that case.

(30)

Classification Results

Original

Cross- validated

Count

%

Count

%

KELOM POK ,00 1,00 2,00 3,00 4,00 5,00 6,00 ,00 1,00 2,00 3,00 4,00 5,00 6,00 ,00 1,00 2,00 3,00 4,00 5,00 6,00 ,00 1,00 2,00 3,00 4,00 5,00 6,00

Predicte d Group Member ship ,00 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 40,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 20,0 40,0 ,0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 20,0 40,0 ,0

1,00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 ,0

,c

,0 ,0 ,0 ,0

2,00 1 2 3 0 2 0 0 20,0 40,0 60,0 ,0 40,0 ,0 ,0 1 2 3 0 2 0 0 20,0 40,0 60,0 ,0 40,0 ,0 ,0

3,00 0 1 0 4 0 2 0 ,0 20,0 ,0 80,0 ,0 40,0 ,0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 ,0 20,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 40,0 ,0

4,00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0

5,00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 ,0 2 0 0 4 0 0 0 40,0 ,0 ,0 80,0 ,0 ,0 ,0

6,00 2 2 2 1 2 1 5 40, C 40, C 40, C 20,0 40,0 20,0 100,0 2 2 2 1 2 1 5 40,0 40,0 40,0 20,0 40,0 20,0 100,0

(31)

6,00 2 2 2 1 2 1 5 40,0 40,0 40,0 20,0 40,0 20,0 100,0 2 2 2 1 2 1 5 40,0 40,0 40,0 20,0 40,0 20,0 100,0

Total 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 100,0 100,0 100,0 100,0 100,0 100,0 100,0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 100,0 100,0 100,0 100,0 100,0 100,0 100,0

a Cross validation is done only for those cases in the analysis. In cross

validation, each case is classified by the functions derived from all cases other than that case.

b 40,0% of original grouped cases correctly classified.

c 22,9% of cross-validated grouped cases correctly classified.