• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

PERBEDAAN PEMBELAJARAN IPA MODEL COOPERATIVE LEARNING TIPE SEND A PROBLEM DAN THINK - PAIR - SHARE DITINJAU DARI HASIL BELAJAR KOGNITIF DAN KETERAMPILAN KOOPERATIF PADA MATERI “SISTEM EKSKRESI” BAGI PESERTA DIDIK KELAS VIII SMPN 1 SEWON.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "PERBEDAAN PEMBELAJARAN IPA MODEL COOPERATIVE LEARNING TIPE SEND A PROBLEM DAN THINK - PAIR - SHARE DITINJAU DARI HASIL BELAJAR KOGNITIF DAN KETERAMPILAN KOOPERATIF PADA MATERI “SISTEM EKSKRESI” BAGI PESERTA DIDIK KELAS VIII SMPN 1 SEWON."

Copied!
3
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

PERBEDAAN PEMBELAJARAN IPA MODEL COOPERATIVE LEARNING TIPE SEND A PROBLEM DAN THINK-PAIR-SHARE DITINJAU DARI HASIL BELAJAR KOGNITIF DAN KETERAMPILAN KOOPERATIF PADA MATERI “SISTEM EKSKRESI” BAGI PESERTA

DIDIK KELAS VIII SMPN 1 SEWON

Oleh

Ilya Rosida Perdana NIM 11312241040

ABSTRAK

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan pembelajaran IPA dengan model Cooperative Learning tipe Send A problem dan Think Pair Share ditinjau hasil belajar kognitif dan keterampilan kooperatif peserta didik.

Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian quasi eksperimen. Subyek penelitian adalah kelas VIII SMP N 1 Sewon semester genap tahun ajaran 2014/2015. Teknik sampling dengan cluster random sampling. Instrumen pembelajaran berupa rencana pelaksanaan pembelajaran dan lembar kerja siswa. Instrumen pengumpulan data yaitu lembar observasi keterampilan kooperatif dan tes pretest-posttest . Teknik pengumpulan data adalah observasi dan tes tertulis. Uji validitas soal menggunakan ITEMAN. Teknik analisis data menggunakan bantuan program SPSS 16. Uji prasyarat dilakukan melalui uji homogenitas dan uji normalitas. Uji hipotesis menggunakan uji paired t-test untuk hasil belajar kognitif dan uji independent t-test untuk keterampilan kooperatif.

Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hasil uji paired t-test sebesar Sig 0,000 < 0,05. Hal ini menyatakan bahwa terdapat perbedaan signifikan hasil belajar menggunakan tipe Send A Problem dan Think Pair Share. Hasil uji independent t-test dengan nilai Sig 0,729 > 0,05 membuktikan bahwa tidak terdapat pebedaan signifikan pada keterampilan kooperatif peserta didik pada tipe Send A Problem dan Think Pair Share. Jadi, pembelajaran IPA dengan model Cooperative Learning tipe Send A Problem dan Think Pair Share yang ditinjau dari hasil belajar kognitif terdapat perbedaan signifikan sedangkan keterampilan kooperatif tidak terdapat perbedaan.

(2)

THE DIFFERENCE OF SEND A PROBLEM AND THINK PAIR SHARE TYPE OF COOPERATIVE SCIENCE LEARNING THAT

OBSERVED FROM COGNITIVE AND COOPERATIVE SKILL STUDY RESULT ON “EXCRETION SYSTEM” FOR STUDENT

CLASS VIII SMP N 1 SEWON

by

Ilya Rosida Perdana 11312241040

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this research was to understand the difference of Send A Problem and Think Pair Share type of cooperative science learning on student cognitive result and cooperative skill. This research was a quasy experiment. The research subject was student class VIII at SMP N 1 Sewon of even semester year academic of 2014/2015. Sampling technic was done by cluster random sampling method. Learning instruments that was used in this research were implementation planning (RPP) and student worksheet (LKPD). The data collection instruments were observation sheet of cooperative skill and pretest – posttest. Data collection technic that was used were observation and written test. The matter validity test was done by ITEMAN. The data analysis technic was done by using homogenization test, normality test, paired t-test for cognitive result hypothesis, independent t-test for cooperative skill hypothesis with program SPSS 16.

The result of paired t-test was Sig. 0,000 < 0,05 the mean of that was the significant difference cognitive result of Send A Problem and Think Pair Share type. The result of independent t-test was Sig. 0,729 > 0,05 this prove that significant undefference cooperative skill of Send A Problem and Think Pair Share. The conclusion of this research was learning science used Send A Problem and Think Pair Share type on cognitive result had significant difference meanwhile cooperative skill was significant undefference.

(3)

THE DIFFERENCE OF SEND A PROBLEM AND THINK PAIR SHARE TYPE OF COOPERATIVE SCIENCE LEARNING THAT OBSERVED FROM COGNITIVE AND COOPERATIVE SKILL STUDY RESULT ON “EXCRETION SYSTEM” FOR STUDENT

CLASS VIII SMP N 1 SEWON

by

Ilya Rosida Perdana 11312241040

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this research was to understand the difference of Send A Problem and Think Pair Share type of cooperative science learning on student cognitive result and cooperative skill. This research was a quasy experiment. The research subject was student class VIII at SMP N 1 Sewon of even semester year academic of 2014/2015. Sampling technic was done by cluster random sampling method. Learning instruments that was used in this research were implementation planning (RPP) and student worksheet (LKPD). The data collection instruments were observation sheet of cooperative skill and pretest posttest. Data collection technic that was used were observation and written test. The matter validity test was done by ITEMAN. The data analysis technic was done by using homogenization test, normality test, paired t-test for cognitive result hypothesis, independent t-test for cooperative skill hypothesis with program SPSS 16.

The result of paired t-test was Sig. 0,000 < 0,05 the mean of that was the significant difference cognitive result of Send A Problem and Think Pair Share type. The result of independent t-test was Sig. 0,729 > 0,05 this prove that significant undefference cooperative skill of Send A Problem and Think Pair Share. The conclusion of this research was learning science used Send A Problem and Think Pair Share type on cognitive result had significant difference meanwhile cooperative skill was significant undeffer ence.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

1) Menumbuhkan dan meningkatkan keimanan, ketaqwaan dan ibadah serta akhlakul karimah menjadi pedoman hidup. 2) Menumbuhkembangkan nilai sosial dan budaya bangsa

[r]

Kemudian terdapat empat kelebihan dari pengering semprot dibandingkan dengan jenis alat pengering lainnya, yaitu: (1) produk akan menjadi kering tanpa bersentuhan

This study aims to determine the influence of tree architecture models Stone for Castanopsis argentea and Petit for Michelia Montana on stemflow, throughfall, surface runoff,

Dari tabel 1.3 dapat diketahui bahwa pada semua hari pengamatan sampel dengan penambahan asap cair redestilasi dan destilasi (kecuali perlakuan asap cair destilasi 1%

intentions essentially is the study of meaning as intended by the text producer. In other words, intentionality refers to the speaker's meaning, in addition to

Objektivitas dari artikel ini adalah untuk mengetahui unjuk kerja sistem refrigerasi siklus tunggal dan ganda yang dapat dimanfaatkan energinya pada bagian panas buang

b. Confrontative coping : usaha untuk mengubah keadaan yang dianggap menekan dengan cara agresif, tingkat kemarahan yang cukup tinggi, dan pengambilan resiko. 1) Apakah