LAMPIRAN 2.
Kurva Standar Beta karoten
KURVA STANDART (BATCH 1)
Konsentrasi
(ppm) Absorbansi 0,1 0,0365 3,1 0,2491 6,1 0,3975 9,1 0,5261 12,1 0,6254 15,1 0,8196
KURVA STANDART (BATCH 2)
Konsentrasi Absorbansi 0,5 0,0834 3,5 0,2692 6,5 0,4521 9,5 0,5726 12,5 0,6882
y = 0,1478x - 0,0749 R2 = 0,988
0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1
0,1 3,1 6,1 9,1 12,1 15,1
Series1
Linear (Series1)
Kurva standart
y = 0,1513x - 0,0408
R
2= 0,9865
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
0,5 3,5 6,5 9,5 12,5
Konsentrasi
A
b
s
o
rb
a
n
s
i
Series1
LAMPIRAN 2. Analisa SPSS
Betakaroten sebelum pengeringan
Tests of Normal ity
,131 18 ,200* ,958 18 ,567
,131 18 ,200* ,942 18 ,316
,176 18 ,147 ,963 18 ,663
metode Cabinet STD Freeze Betakarot en
Stat istic df Sig. Stat istic df Sig.
Kolmogorov -Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
This is a lower bound of the true signif icance. *.
Lillief ors Signif icance Correction a.
ANOVA
Betakarot en
4,138 2 2,069 2,448 ,097
43,110 51 ,845
47,248 53
Between Groups Within Groups Total
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Post Hoc Tests
Betakaroten
Duncana
18 5,6489
18 5,8722 5,8722
18 6,3150
,469 ,155
metode Cabinet Freeze STD Sig.
N 1 2
Subset f or alpha = . 05
Betakaroten setelah pengeringan
Tests of Normal ity
,154 18 ,200* ,947 18 ,376
,173 18 ,164 ,941 18 ,304
,135 18 ,200* ,944 18 ,337
metode Cabinet STD Freeze Betakarot en
Stat istic df Sig. Stat istic df Sig.
Kolmogorov -Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
This is a lower bound of the true signif icance. *.
Lillief ors Signif icance Correction a.
ANOVA
Betakarot en
23,828 2 11,914 8,520 ,001
71,315 51 1,398
95,143 53
Between Groups Within Groups Total
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Post Hoc Tests
Betakaroten
Duncana
18 3,9233
18 5,1822
18 5,4456
1,000 ,507
metode Cabinet STD Freeze Sig.
N 1 2
Subset f or alpha = . 05
Lightness sebelum pengeringan
Tests of Normality
,162 18 ,200* ,943 18 ,330
,119 18 ,200* ,971 18 ,818
,183 18 ,114 ,914 18 ,100
metode Cabinet STD Freeze light ness
St at ist ic df Sig. St at ist ic df Sig. Kolmogorov -Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
This is a lower bound of the true signif icance. *.
Lillief ors Signif icance Correction a.
ANOVA
light ness
689,938 2 344,969 103,641 ,000
169,753 51 3,328
859,690 53
Between Groups Within Groups Total
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Post Hoc Tests
lightness
Duncana
18 34,1461
18 37,1450
18 42,7694
1,000 1,000 1,000
metode Cabinet STD Freeze Sig.
N 1 2 3
Subset f or alpha = .05
Lightness setelah pengeringan
Tests of Normality
,154 18 ,200* ,923 18 ,149
,177 18 ,141 ,944 18 ,344
,135 18 ,200* ,924 18 ,151
metode Cabinet STD Freeze light ness
St at ist ic df Sig. St at ist ic df Sig. Kolmogorov -Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
This is a lower bound of the true signif icance. *.
Lillief ors Signif icance Correction a.
ANOVA
light ness
939,630 2 469,815 73,464 ,000 326,155 51 6,395
1265,784 53 Between Groups
Within Groups Total
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Post Hoc Tests
lightness
Duncana
18 26,8650 18 28,5244
18 36,4261
,054 1,000 metode
Cabinet STD Freeze Sig.
N 1 2
Subset f or alpha = . 05
Nilai a* sebelum pengeringan
Tests of Normal ity
,098 18 ,200* ,960 18 ,596
,199 18 ,058 ,928 18 ,180
,176 18 ,147 ,923 18 ,144
metode Cabinet STD Freeze nilai_a
St at ist ic df Sig. St at ist ic df Sig. Kolmogorov -Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
This is a lower bound of the true signif icance. *.
Lillief ors Signif icance Correction a.
ANOVA
nilai_a
19,439 2 9,720 3,594 ,035
137,928 51 2,704
157,367 53
Between Groups Within Groups Total
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Post Hoc Tests
ni lai_a
Duncana
18 37,5561
18 38,6622
18 38,9472
1,000 ,605
metode Cabinet Freeze STD Sig.
N 1 2
Subset f or alpha = . 05
Nilai a* setelah pengeringan
Tests of Normal ity
,110 18 ,200* ,973 18 ,858
,124 18 ,200* ,972 18 ,837
,255 18 ,003 ,871 18 ,019
metode Cabinet STD Freeze nilai_a
St at ist ic df Sig. St at ist ic df Sig. Kolmogorov -Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
This is a lower bound of the true signif icance. *.
Lillief ors Signif icance Correction a.
ANOVA
nilai_a
1101,720 2 550,860 103,575 ,000
271,243 51 5,318
1372,962 53
Between Groups Within Groups Total
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Post Hoc Tests
nil ai_a
Duncana
18 20,0667
18 23,0906
18 30,7956
1,000 1,000 1,000
metode Cabinet STD Freeze Sig.
N 1 2 3
Subset f or alpha = .05
Nilai hue angle* sebelum pengeringan
Tests of Normal ity
,112 18 ,200* ,980 18 ,946
,167 18 ,200* ,873 18 ,020
,104 18 ,200* ,984 18 ,983
metode Cabinet STD Freeze Hue_angel
St at ist ic df Sig. St at ist ic df Sig. Kolmogorov -Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
This is a lower bound of the true signif icance. *.
Lillief ors Signif icance Correction a.
ANOVA
Hue_angel
571,055 2 285,528 45,032 ,000 323,367 51 6,341
894,422 53 Between Groups
Within Groups Total
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Post Hoc Tests
Hue_angel
Duncana
18 28,8444
18 32,4211
18 36,7967
1,000 1,000 1,000
metode Cabinet STD Freeze Sig.
N 1 2 3
Subset f or alpha = .05
Nilai hue angle* setelah pengeringan
Tests of Normal ity
,178 18 ,135 ,922 18 ,139
,195 18 ,069 ,858 18 ,011
,122 18 ,200* ,969 18 ,774
metode Cabinet STD Freeze Hue_angel
St at ist ic df Sig. St at ist ic df Sig. Kolmogorov -Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
This is a lower bound of the true signif icance. *.
Lillief ors Signif icance Correction a.
ANOVA
Hue_angel
1456,106 2 728,053 48,381 ,000
767,471 51 15,048
2223,577 53
Between Groups Within Groups Total
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Post Hoc Tests
Hue_angel
Duncana
18 26,4700
18 30,5872
18 38,9511
1,000 1,000 1,000
metode Cabinet STD Freeze Sig.
N 1 2 3
Subset f or alpha = .05
Nilai chroma* sebelum pengeringan
Tests of Normal ity
,090 18 ,200* ,967 18 ,749
,197 18 ,062 ,940 18 ,288
,130 18 ,200* ,979 18 ,938
metode Cabinet STD Freeze chroma
Stat istic df Sig. Stat istic df Sig.
Kolmogorov -Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
This is a lower bound of the true signif icance. *.
Lillief ors Signif icance Correction a.
ANOVA
chroma
2975,958 2 1487,979 112,879 ,000 672,286 51 13,182
3648,243 53 Between Groups
Within Groups Total
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
ANOVA
chroma
2975,958 2 1487,979 112,879 ,000 672,286 51 13,182
3648,243 53 Between Groups
Within Groups Total
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Post Hoc Tests
chroma
Duncana
18 22,4444
18 26,9264
18 39,9474
1,000 1,000 1,000
metode Cabinet STD Freeze Sig.
N 1 2 3
Subset f or alpha = .05
Nilai chroma* setelah pengeringan
Tests of Normal ity
,103 18 ,200* ,972 18 ,832
,179 18 ,132 ,933 18 ,218
,167 18 ,200* ,891 18 ,041
metode Cabinet STD Freeze chroma
Stat istic df Sig. Stat istic df Sig.
Kolmogorov -Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
This is a lower bound of the true signif icance. *.
Lillief ors Signif icance Correction a.
ANOVA
chroma
2975,958 2 1487,979 112,879 ,000 672,286 51 13,182
3648,243 53 Between Groups
Within Groups Total
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Post Hoc Tests
chroma
Duncana
18 22,4444
18 26,9264
18 39,9474
1,000 1,000 1,000
metode Cabinet STD Freeze Sig.
N 1 2 3
Subset f or alpha = .05
Uji T-Test Betakaroten Sebelum pengeringan-Sesudah pengeringan
Independent Samples Test
13,592 ,000 4,909 106 ,000 1,09500 ,22305 ,65278 1,53722
4,909 95,226 ,000 1,09500 ,22305 ,65220 1,53780
Equal v ariances assumed Equal v ariances not assumed Betakarot en
F Sig.
Lev ene's Test f or Equality of Variances
t df Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean Dif f erence
St d. Error
Dif f erence Lower Upper 95% Conf idence
Interv al of the Dif f erence t-t est f or Equality of Means
Uji T-Test lightness Sebelum pengeringan-Sesudah pengeringan
Independent Samples Test
1,264 ,263 8,604 106 ,000 7,41500 ,86177 5,70645 9,12355
8,604 102,267 ,000 7,41500 ,86177 5,70573 9,12427
Equal v ariances assumed Equal v ariances not assumed light ness
F Sig.
Lev ene's Test f or Equality of Variances
t df Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean Dif f erence
St d. Error
Dif f erence Lower Upper 95% Conf idence
Uji T-Test nilai a* Sebelum pengeringan-Sesudah pengeringan
Independent Samples Test
52,841 ,000 18,787 106 ,000 13,73759 ,73124 12,28785 15,18734
18,787 64,992 ,000 13,73759 ,73124 12,27721 15,19798 Equal v ariances
assumed Equal v ariances not assumed nilai_a
F Sig.
Lev ene's Test f or Equality of Variances
t df Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean Dif f erence
Std. Error
Dif f erence Lower Upper 95% Conf idence
Interv al of the Dif f erence t-test f or Equality of Means
Uji T-Test nilai hue angle Sebelum pengeringan-Sesudah pengeringan
Independent Samples Test
7,236 ,008 ,656 106 ,513 ,68463 1,04377 -1,38474 2,75400
,656 89,700 ,514 ,68463 1,04377 -1,38909 2,75835
Equal v ariances assumed Equal v ariances not assumed Hue_angel
F Sig.
Lev ene's Test f or Equality of Variances
t df Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean Dif f erence
Std. Error
Dif f erence Lower Upper 95% Conf idence
Uji T-Test nilai chroma Sebelum pengeringan-Sesudah pengeringan
Independent Samples Test
44,165 ,000 13,200 106 ,000 15,93177 1,20693 13,53891 18,32463
13,200 67,829 ,000 15,93177 1,20693 13,52327 18,34027 Equal v ariances
assumed Equal v ariances not assumed chroma
F Sig.
Lev ene's Test f or Equality of Variances
t df Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean Dif f erence
St d. Error
Dif f erence Lower Upper 95% Conf idence
Hasil Uji Hubungan
Correlati ons
1
,000
,642**
,280**
1,000
,000
,003
108
108
108
108
,000
1
-,641**
-,430**
1,000
,000
,000
108
108
108
108
,642**
-,641**
1
,386**
,000
,000
,000
108
108
108
108
,280**
-,430**
,386**
1
,003
,000
,000
108
108
108
108
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
metode
perlakuan
light ness
Betakarot en
metode
perlakuan
light ness
Betakarot en
Hasil uji beda Friedman test dan Wilcoxon test pada uji konsumen
Friedman Test
Ranks
Mean Rank Cabinet 1,68 STD 2,08 Freeze 2,24
Test Statistics(a)
N 50
Chi-Square 8,320
df 2
Asymp. Sig. ,016 a Friedman Test
Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test
Test Statistics(b)
STD - Cabinet
Freeze -
Cabinet Freeze - STD Z -2,431(a) -2,740(a) -,538(a) Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) ,015 ,006 ,591 a Based on negative ranks.
LAMPIRAN 3. Kuisioner uji konsumen
UJI RANKING HEDONIK
Nama
:
Tanggal :30 Mei 2011
Produk : Cabai Merah Kering
Atribut :
Overall
warna
Instruksi :
Di hadapan Anda terdapat 3 sampel cabai merah kering. Amatilah sampel secara
berurutan dari kiri ke kanan dengan menggunakan mata anda. Bandingkan warna
sampel dengan mulai dari yang paling Anda sukai (=3)hingga sampel dengan warna
yang paling tidak Anda sukai (=1).
Kode Sampel
Ranking (jangan ada yang dobel)
________
________
________
________
________
________
________
________
Berikan alasan untuk masing-masing sampel yang anda pilih (mengapa anda menyukai /
memilih sampel tersebut)
1.
2.
3.
Keterangan:
3= Suka
2= Cukup Suka
1= Tidak suka
WORKSHEET UJI RANKING HEDONIK
Tanggal uji
:
30 Mei 2011
Jenis sampel :
Cabai Merah Kering
Identifikasi sampel
Kode
Cabai Merah Kering (Cabinet)
A
Cabai Merah Kering (STD)
B
Cabai Merah Kering (
Freeze
)
C
Kode Kombinasi Urutan Penyajian :
A B C
1
A C B
11
C A B
21
A C B
31
C B A
41
A C B
2
A B C
12
A B C
22
A B C
32
A B C
42
B A C
3
B A C
13
B A C
23
B A C
33
B A C
43
C B A
4
B C A
14
A C B
24
B C A
34
A C B
44
C A B
5
A B C
15
A B C
25
A C B
35
C B A
45
B C A
6
A C B
16
C B A
26
A B C
36
C A B
46
A C B
7
B A C
17
C A B
27
B A C
37
A C B
47
A B C
8
B C A
18
B A C
28
B C A
38
A B C
48
C B A
9
B A C
19
B A C
29
B A C
39
B A C
49
Penyajian :
Booth
Panelis
Kode Sampel
Booth
Panelis
Kode Sampel
I
1
862
145
396
I
26
166
317
215
II
2
653
489
466
II
27
315
321
881
III
3
522
967
618
III
28
992
763
516
I
4
975
811
637
I
29
128
271
336
IV
5
266
869
915
IV
30
319
425
575
V
6
274
441
994
V
31
618
339
492
I
7
139
151
256
I
32
119
216
945
II
8
254
372
817
II
33
932
831
712
III
9
644
871
175
III
34
957
375
888
IV
10
869
216
322
IV
35
876
921
655
V
11
181
148
127
V
36
588
493
322
I
12
167
218
321
I
37
666
355
817
II
13
911
828
559
II
38
176
397
278
III
14
421
743
179
III
39
134
168
965
I
15
394
461
283
I
40
124
178
964
IV
16
688
121
478
IV
41
131
181
933
V
17
751
143
238
V
42
635
557
861
I
18
477
223
254
I
43
423
555
219
II
19
129
118
998
II
44
399
286
273
III
20
113
269
254
III
45
679
593
587
IV
21
159
588
448
IV
46
499
395
927
V
22
233
125
111
V
47
933
276
317
I
23
522
433
311
I
48
929
816
358
II
24
581
318
421
II
49
783
687
566
Tabel 1. Hasil Uji Hedonik warna 3 Cabai kering (3 metode yang berbeda)
Panelis Cabinet STD Freeze1 1 2 3
2 2 1 3
3 2 3 1
4 1 2 3
5 2 1 3
6 2 1 3
7 2 3 1
8 2 1 3
9 1 2 3
10 2 3 1
11 1 2 3
12 2 3 1
13 1 2 3
14 3 2 1
15 3 2 1
16 2 3 1
17 1 2 3
18 2 1 3
19 2 1 3
20 2 3 1
21 2 1 3
22 3 2 1
23 1 2 3
24 2 1 3
25 1 3 2
26 2 3 1
27 2 1 3
28 1 2 3
29 2 1 3
30 1 2 3
31 2 3 1
32 1 2 3
33 2 1 3
34 1 3 2
35 3 1 2
36 3 2 1
37 2 3 1
38 3 2 1
39 1 2 3
40 1 3 2
41 1 2 3
42 2 3 1
43 1 2 3
44 2 3 1
45 2 1 3
46 1 2 3
47 1 3 2
49 2 3 1
50 2 3 1
LAMPIRAN 4. Perhitungan Dry Basis Betakaroten
Konversi Dry Basis =
)
100
(
)
100
/
(
bahanKA
g
karoten
mg
•
Cabinet Drying
Cabai Segar
Kandungan betakaroten (mg β
-karoten/100gram) = 66,57
Konversi Dry Basis (IU) :
5
,
65
09
,
88
100
57
,
66
Cabai Kering
Kandungan betakaroten (mg β
-karoten/100gram) = 359,97
Konversi Dry Basis (IU) :
3
,
92
20
,
8
100
97
,
359
•
Solar Tunnel Drying
Cabai Segar
Kandungan betakaroten (mg β
-karoten/100gram) = 78,82
Konversi Dry Basis (IU):
6
,
31
48
,
87
100
82
,
78
Cabai Kering
Kandungan betakaroten (mg β
-karoten/100gram) = 470,92
Konversi Dry Basis (IU) :
5
,
18
13
,
9
100
92
,
470
•
Freeze Drying
Cabai Segar
Kandungan betakaroten (mg β
-karoten/100gram) = 77,41
Konversi Dry Basis (IU):
5
,
87
77
,
86
100
41
,
77
Cabai Kering
Kandungan betakaroten (mg β
-karoten/100gram) = 492,80
Konversi Dry Basis (IU) :
5
,
45
