Lampiran 1
Pada Penelitian: KUESIONER PENELITIAN
PENGARUH FAKTOR SOSIAL EKONOMI DAN BUDAYA TERHADAP JUMLAH ANAK DI DESA SAMALANGA KABUPATEN BIREUEN
TAHUN 2014 Yang bertanda tangan dibawah ini :
1. Nama ibu :
2. Umur :
3. Alamat :
Setelah mendapatkan penjelasan tentang penelitian dengan judul “Pengaruh Faktor Sosial Ekonomi Dan Budaya Terhadap Jumlah Anak Di Desa Samalanga Kabupaten Bireuen Tahun 2014”. Dengan ini menyatakan kesedian menjadi responden penelitian tersebut diatas dengan jujur dan tanpa paksaan, yang akan dilakukan oleh mahasiswa S-2 Program Pascasarjana Ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat peminatan Kesehatan Reproduksi Universitas Sumatera Utara. Demikian persetujuan kami semoga dapat digunakan sebagaimana mestinya.
Lhokseumawe, 2014
Yang membuat pernyataan
(____________________)
PERNYATAAN KESEDIAAN MENJADI RESPONDEN (INFORMED CONSENT)
A. Lampiran 1
KUESIONER PENELITIAN
PENGARUH FAKTOR SOSIAL EKONOMI DAN BUDAYA TERHADAP JUMLAH ANAK DI DESA SAMALANGA KABUPATEN BIREUEN
TAHUN 2014
No. Urut : diisi peneliti Petunjuk pengisian kuesioner
1. Isilah titik – titik yang disediakan ataulingkari pilihan jawaban yang disediakan.
2. Jawaban anda dengan jujur sangat membantu penelitian ini.
I. Identitas Responden 1. Agama : 2. Suku : 3. Alamat : 4. Umur : 5. Usia Menikah :
A. Berapakah jumlah anak yang dimiliki saat ini :……….. B. Faktor Sosio Ekonomi
1. Apa pendidikan terakhir ibu ?... 2. Apa pendidikan terakhir bapak ?... 3. Apakah ibu bekerja?...
Jika ya, apa pekerjaan ibu?... 4. Apakah bapak bekerja?...
5. Berapa jumlah pendapatan keluarga (gabungan pendpatan bapak dan ibu) per bulan?...
C. Budaya (Nilai Anak)
no. Pernyataan Setuju Tidak
Setuju 1
.
Setiap yang sudah menikah harus segera mendapatkan anak
2 .
Setiap keluarga wajib memiliki anak laki-laki
3 .
Istri takut dicemooh jika belum dapat memberikan anak laki-laki di keluarga
4 .
Anak laki – laki membantu pekerjaan ayah seperti mencangkul di sawah
5 .
Anak laki-laki diandalkan untuk membantu membantu keuangan keluarga
6 .
Anak perempuan tidak perlu bersekolah tinggi – tinggi
7 .
Anak perempuan lebih telaten merawat orang tuanya yang sakit
8. Anak diyakini dapat membantu mewujudkan cita – cita/keinginan orangtuanya
9. Banyak anak banyak rezeki
10. Ikut KB dianggap menolak rezeki anak dari Tuhan 11. Anak diharapkan menjadi sumber investasi masa
depan bagi orang tua
12. Seorang wanita dikatakan sehat atau subur bila memiliki anak banyak
C. Lampiran 3
Uji Validitas dan Reabilitas Pengolahan I Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items .789 15 Item-Total Statistics Scale Mean if Item Deleted Scale Variance if Item Deleted Corrected Item-Total Correlation Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted item1 11.43 7.702 .216 .789 item2 11.50 7.017 .498 .769 item3 11.50 7.155 .425 .775 item4 11.43 7.633 .258 .787 item5 11.50 6.948 .535 .766 item6 11.60 6.938 .431 .775 item7 11.47 7.637 .212 .791 item8 11.43 7.289 .473 .773 item9 11.70 6.769 .452 .773 item10 11.57 7.495 .204 .795 item11 11.70 6.493 .572 .760 item12 11.47 7.223 .440 .774
Case Processing Summary
N %
Cases Valid 30 100.0
Excludeda 0 .0
Total 30 100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
item13 11.43 7.495 .343 .781
item14 11.47 7.292 .401 .777
item15 11.47 7.154 .480 .771
Pengolahan II
Reliability
Case Processing Summary
N %
Cases Valid 30 100.0
Excludeda 0 .0
Total 30 100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items .815 15 Item-Total Statistics Scale Mean if Item Deleted Scale Variance if Item Deleted Corrected Item-Total Correlation Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted item1 11.53 7.706 .481 .801 item2 11.53 7.706 .481 .801 item3 11.53 7.844 .411 .806 item4 11.43 8.737 .040 .824 item5 11.53 7.637 .516 .798 item6 11.63 7.551 .448 .804 item7 11.43 8.530 .180 .818 item8 11.47 7.913 .498 .801 item9 11.70 7.597 .391 .809 item10 11.57 7.771 .407 .806 item11 11.77 7.151 .549 .795
item12 11.50 7.914 .425 .805
item13 11.47 7.844 .541 .799
item14 11.53 7.706 .481 .801
Lampiran 2 Analisis Univariat Frequency Table
J.anak
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent Valid sedikit 52 24.8 24.8 24.8 Banyak 158 75.2 75.2 100.0 Total 210 100.0 100.0 jumlahanak Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1 4 1.9 1.9 1.9 2 47 22.4 22.4 24.3 3 14 6.7 6.7 31.0 4 31 14.8 14.8 45.7 5 41 19.5 19.5 65.2 6 48 22.9 22.9 88.1 7 17 8.1 8.1 96.2 8 6 2.9 2.9 99.0 9 2 1.0 1.0 100.0 Total 210 100.0 100.0 Umur Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 45-49 123 58.6 58.6 58.6 50-54 77 36.7 36.7 95.2 55-59 10 4.8 4.8 100.0 Total 210 100.0 100.0
Suku Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Aceh 167 79.5 79.5 79.5 Jawa 37 17.6 17.6 97.1 Melayu 3 1.4 1.4 98.6 Batak 3 1.4 1.4 100.0 Total 210 100.0 100.0 Agama Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Islam 208 99.0 99.0 99.0 Budha 2 1.0 1.0 100.0 Total 210 100.0 100.0 pddkibu
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent Valid Tinggi 84 40.0 40.0 40.0 Rendah 126 60.0 60.0 100.0 Total 210 100.0 100.0 pddkayah
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid Tinggi 98 46.7 46.7 46.7
Rendah 112 53.3 53.3 100.0
pkrjibu
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent Valid tidak 124 59.0 59.0 59.0 ya 86 41.0 41.0 100.0 Total 210 100.0 100.0 Pkrjayah
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent Valid tidak 14 6.7 6.7 6.7 ya 196 93.3 93.3 100.0 Total 210 100.0 100.0 Pendapatan
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent Valid rendah 124 59.0 59.0 59.0 tinggi 86 41.0 41.0 100.0 Total 210 100.0 100.0 Budaya Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid positif 33 15.7 15.7 15.7 negatif 177 84.3 84.3 100.0 Total 210 100.0 100.0 B2
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Benar 88 41.9 41.9 100.0
Total 210 100.0 100.0
B3
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent Valid Salah 97 46.2 46.2 46.2 Benar 113 53.8 53.8 100.0 Total 210 100.0 100.0 B4
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent Valid Salah 46 21.9 21.9 21.9 Benar 164 78.1 78.1 100.0 Total 210 100.0 100.0 B5
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent Valid Salah 54 25.7 25.7 25.7 Benar 156 74.3 74.3 100.0 Total 210 100.0 100.0 B6
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent Valid Salah 133 63.3 63.3 63.3 Benar 77 36.7 36.7 100.0 Total 210 100.0 100.0 B7
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid Salah 16 7.6 7.6 7.6
Benar 194 92.4 92.4 100.0
Total 210 100.0 100.0
B8
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent Valid Salah 15 7.1 7.1 7.1 Benar 195 92.9 92.9 100.0 Total 210 100.0 100.0 B9
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent Valid Salah 51 24.3 24.3 24.3 Benar 159 75.7 75.7 100.0 Total 210 100.0 100.0 B10
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent Valid Salah 78 37.1 37.1 37.1 Benar 132 62.9 62.9 100.0 Total 210 100.0 100.0 B11
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent Valid Salah 36 17.1 17.1 17.1 Benar 174 82.9 82.9 100.0 Total 210 100.0 100.0 B12
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Salah 75 35.7 35.7 35.7 Benar 135 64.3 64.3 100.0 Total 210 100.0 100.0 B13
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid Salah 47 22.4 22.4 22.4
Benar 163 77.6 77.6 100.0
Lampiran 3 Analisa Bivariat
pddkibu * J.anak Crosstabulation J.anak
Total sedikit Banyak
pddkibu tinggi Count 27 57 84
Expected Count 20.8 63.2 84.0 % within pddkibu 32.1% 67.9% 100.0% rendah Count 25 101 126 Expected Count 31.2 94.8 126.0 % within pddkibu 19.8% 80.2% 100.0% Total Count 52 158 210 Expected Count 52.0 158.0 210.0 % within pddkibu 24.8% 75.2% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 4.094a 1 .043 Continuity Correctionb 3.460 1 .063 Likelihood Ratio 4.037 1 .045
Fisher's Exact Test .051 .032
Linear-by-Linear
Association 4.074 1 .044
N of Valid Casesb 210
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 20.80.
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig. Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .138 .043
N of Valid Cases 210
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval Lower Upper Odds Ratio for pddkibu
(tinggi / rendah) 1.914 1.016 3.606 For cohort J.anak = sedikit 1.620 1.014 2.589 For cohort J.anak =
Banyak .847 .714 1.004
N of Valid Cases 210
pddkayah * J.anak Crosstabulation J.anak
Total sedikit Banyak
Pddkayah tinggi Count 28 70 98
Expected Count 24.3 73.7 98.0 % within pddkayah 28.6% 71.4% 100.0% rendah Count 24 88 112 Expected Count 27.7 84.3 112.0 % within pddkayah 21.4% 78.6% 100.0% Total Count 52 158 210 Expected Count 52.0 158.0 210.0 % within pddkayah 24.8% 75.2% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 1.431a 1 .232
Continuity
Correctionb 1.074 1 .300 Likelihood Ratio 1.429 1 .232
qaFisher's Exact Test .264 .150
Linear-by-Linear
Association 1.425 1 .233 N of Valid Casesb 210
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 24.27.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig. Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .082 .232
N of Valid Cases 210
Risk Estimate Value
95% Confidence Interval Lower Upper Odds Ratio for pddkayah
(tinggi / rendah) 1.467 .782 2.751 For cohort J.anak = sedikit 1.333 .831 2.140 For cohort J.anak =
Banyak .909 .776 1.065
N of Valid Cases 210
pkrjibu * J.anak Crosstabulation J.anak
Total sedikit Banyak
pkrjibu tidak Count 21 103 124
Expected Count 30.7 93.3 124.0 % within pkrjibu 16.9% 83.1% 100.0%
ya Count 31 55 86
Expected Count 21.3 64.7 86.0 % within pkrjibu 36.0% 64.0% 100.0%
Total Count 52 158 210 Expected Count 52.0 158.0 210.0 % within pkrjibu 24.8% 75.2% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 9.955a 1 .002 Continuity Correctionb 8.956 1 .003 Likelihood Ratio 9.836 1 .002
Fisher's Exact Test .002 .001
Linear-by-Linear
Association 9.908 1 .002
N of Valid Casesb 210
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 21.30.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig. Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .213 .002
N of Valid Cases 210
Risk Estimate Value
95% Confidence Interval Lower Upper Odds Ratio for pkrjibu
(tidak / ya) .362 .190 .688
For cohort J.anak = sedikit .470 .290 .760 For cohort J.anak =
Banyak 1.299 1.088 1.551
pkrjayah * J.anak Crosstabulation J.anak
Total sedikit Banyak
pkrjayah tidak Count 3 11 14
Expected Count 3.5 10.5 14.0 % within pkrjayah 21.4% 78.6% 100.0% ya Count 49 147 196 Expected Count 48.5 147.5 196.0 % within pkrjayah 25.0% 75.0% 100.0% Total Count 52 158 210 Expected Count 52.0 158.0 210.0 % within pkrjayah 24.8% 75.2% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Value Df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square .089a 1 .765 Continuity Correctionb .000 1 1.000 Likelihood Ratio .092 1 .761
Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .528
Linear-by-Linear
Association .089 1 .765
N of Valid Casesb 210
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.47.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig. Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .021 .765
Risk Estimate Value
95% Confidence Interval Lower Upper Odds Ratio for pkrjayah
(tidak / ya) .818 .219 3.053
For cohort J.anak = sedikit .857 .305 2.406 For cohort J.anak =
Banyak 1.048 .788 1.393
N of Valid Cases 210
pendapatan * J.anak Crosstabulation J.anak
Total sedikit Banyak
pendapatan rendah Count 19 105 124
Expected Count 30.7 93.3 124.0 % within pendapatan 15.3% 84.7% 100.0% tinggi Count 33 53 86 Expected Count 21.3 64.7 86.0 % within pendapatan 38.4% 61.6% 100.0% Total Count 52 158 210 Expected Count 52.0 158.0 210.0 % within pendapatan 24.8% 75.2% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Value Df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 14.481a 1 .000 Continuity Correctionb 13.270 1 .000 Likelihood Ratio 14.339 1 .000
Linear-by-Linear
Association 14.412 1 .000 N of Valid Casesb 210
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 21.30.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig. Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .254 .000
N of Valid Cases 210
Risk Estimate Value
95% Confidence Interval Lower Upper Odds Ratio for pendapatan
(rendah / tinggi) .291 .151 .559 For cohort J.anak = sedikit .399 .244 .654 For cohort J.anak =
Banyak 1.374 1.144 1.650
N of Valid Cases 210
budaya * J.anak Crosstabulation J.anak
Total Sedikit Banyak
budaya Positif Count 20 13 33
Expected Count 8.2 24.8 33.0 % within budaya 60.6% 39.4% 100.0% Negative Count 32 145 177 Expected Count 43.8 133.2 177.0 % within budaya 18.1% 81.9% 100.0% Total Count 52 158 210 Expected Count 52.0 158.0 210.0 % within budaya 24.8% 75.2% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests Value Df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 27.001a 1 .000 Continuity Correctionb 24.766 1 .000 Likelihood Ratio 23.527 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear
Association 26.872 1 .000
N of Valid Casesb 210
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.17.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig. Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .338 .000
N of Valid Cases 210
Risk Estimate Value
95% Confidence Interval Lower Upper Odds Ratio for budaya
(positif / negatif) 6.971 3.144 15.457 For cohort J.anak = sedikit 3.352 2.209 5.087 For cohort J.anak =
Banyak .481 .313 .738
Lampiran 4
Analisis Multivariat
Case Processing Summary
Unweighted Casesa N Percent
Selected Cases Included in Analysis 210 100.0
Missing Cases 0 .0
Total 210 100.0
Unselected Cases 0 .0
Total 210 100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
Dependent Variable Encoding Original
Value Internal Value
sedikit 0
Banyak 1
Block 1: Method = Backward Stepwise (Likelihood Ratio) Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Chi-square df Sig. Step 1 Step 33.608 4 .000 Block 33.608 4 .000 Model 33.608 4 .000 Step 2a Step -.002 1 .967 Block 33.607 3 .000 Model 33.607 3 .000 Step 3a Step -2.657 1 .103 Block 30.950 2 .000 Model 30.950 2 .000
a. A negative squares value indicates that the Chi-squares value has decreased from the previous step.
Model Summary Step
-2 Log likelihood
Cox & Snell R Square
Nagelkerke R Square
1 201.467a .148 .220
2 201.469a .148 .220
3 204.126a .137 .203
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 4 because parameter estimates changed by less than .001.
Classification Tablea Observed Predicted J.anak Percentage Correct sedikit Banyak
Step 1 J.anak sedikit 17 35 32.7
Banyak 9 149 94.3
Overall Percentage 79.0
Step 2 J.anak sedikit 17 35 32.7
Banyak 9 149 94.3
Overall Percentage 79.0
Step 3 J.anak sedikit 16 36 30.8
Banyak 7 151 95.6
Overall Percentage 79.5
Variables in the Equation
B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)
95.0% C.I.for EXP(B) Lower Upper Step 1a pddkibu -.016 .393 .002 1 .967 .984 .455 2.126 pkrjibu -.606 .372 2.652 1 .103 .545 .263 1.131 pendapatan -.773 .402 3.696 1 .055 .461 .210 1.015 budaya 1.656 .427 15.048 1 .000 5.236 2.268 12.086 Constant .458 .539 .723 1 .395 1.581 Step 2a pkrjibu -.605 .370 2.669 1 .102 .546 .265 1.128 pendapatan -.767 .374 4.205 1 .040 .464 .223 .967 budaya 1.654 .425 15.157 1 .000 5.228 2.273 12.020 Constant .447 .461 .940 1 .332 1.563 Step 3a pendapatan -.961 .354 7.380 1 .007 .382 .191 .765 budaya 1.697 .420 16.323 1 .000 5.460 2.396 12.440 Constant .224 .436 .265 1 .607 1.251
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pddkibu, pkrjibu, pendapatan, budaya. Model if Term Removed
Variable Model Log Likelihood Change in -2 Log Likelihood df Sig. of the Change Step 1 pddkibu -100.735 .002 1 .967 pkrjibu -102.051 2.634 1 .105 pendapatan -102.567 3.666 1 .056 budaya -108.391 15.314 1 .000 Step 2 pkrjibu -102.063 2.657 1 .103 pendapatan -102.832 4.196 1 .041 budaya -108.421 15.372 1 .000 Step 3 pendapatan -105.774 7.423 1 .006 budaya -110.368 16.611 1 .000
Variables not in the Equation
Score df Sig. Step 2a Variables pddkibu .002 1 .967
Overall Statistics .002 1 .967
Step 3b Variables pddkibu .025 1 .875
pkrjibu 2.704 1 .100
Overall Statistics 2.708 2 .258
a. Variable(s) removed on step 2: pddkibu. b. Variable(s) removed on step 3: pkrjibu. Block 0: Beginning Block
Classification Tablea,b
Observed
Predicted
J.anak Percentage Correct sedikit Banyak
Step 0 J.anak sedikit 0 52 .0
Banyak 0 158 100.0
Overall Percentage 75.2
a. Constant is included in the model. b. The cut value is .500
Variables in the Equation
B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)
Step 0 Constant 1.111 .160 48.322 1 .000 3.038
Variables not in the Equation
Score df Sig. Step 0 Variables pddkibu 4.094 1 .043
pkrjibu 9.955 1 .002
pendapatan 14.481 1 .000
budaya 27.001 1 .000
Overall Statistics 36.034 4 .000
Name of survey: Primary sampling unit: Size unit: Ultimate sampling unit: Eligible unit:
PENGARUH SOSEK DAN BUDAYA TERHADAP JUMLAH ANAK DESA
Number of Households
Sample size:
Clusters: 30
Households per cluster: 7 Other informations:
Populations per household: 6.80 Proportion of eligible person: 0.1300
Cluster Data
Number Desa Households
1
Keude Aceh
2
Sangso
3
Pante Rheng
4
Namploh Baro
5
Namploh Manyang
6
NPL Blang Garang
7
Namploh Krueng
8
Namploh Papeun
9
Mns Lhung
10
Lhokseumira
11
Meuliek
12
Kandang
13
KP. Putoh
14
M ideun Jok
15
Mideun Geudong
16
Lhung Keubeu
17
Meurah
18
Chot Meurah Baroh
19
Chot Meurak Blang
20
KP. Meulum
21
Glumpang Bungkok
22
Mesjid Baro
23
Matang Wakeuh
24
Darussalam
25
Bate iliek
26
Pulo Baroh
27
Matang Jareung
28 Gampong Matang
148
150
158
69
39
46
52
65
126
33
367
107
101
63
82
38
12
55
72
106
99
60
60
80
131
101
95
108
Cluster Data
Number DESA Households
29 Glp. Payong 62 30 Paloh 55 31 Lancok 63 32 Ulee Jeumatan 62 33 Cot Siren 128 34 Cot Mane 48 35 Ulee Alue 55 36 Alue Barat 39 37 KP. Baro 87 38 Pineung Siribe 74 39 Ulee Ue 63 40 Matang Teungoh 102 41 Tanjung Baro 143 42 Aangking Barat 50 43 Meunasah L k 41 44 Mns Puuk 48 45 Mns Lincah 33 46 Tanjong Idem 33 Total 3907.00 Mean 84.93 Standard Deviation 52
Sample Size: Parameter Estimation
Calculation purpose: Estimated proportion with attribute: One-half length of confidence interval: Desired level of confidence: Homogeinity parameter: Level of homogeinity: Number of clusters:
Average number of sample per cluster:
Test the proposed sample size 0.3200 0.1000 Rate of Homogeneity Low 9 5 % 30 7
Target standard error of
proportion: Actual standard error of proportion:
Design effect (deff): Rate of homogeinity (rah): Point estimation for proportion: Lower confidence limit: Upper 0.0489 0.0455 2.00 0.1667 0.3200 0.2269 0.4131 Sample size for proposed cluster survey: 210 Is sample size adequate for stated need? YES
90% confidence interval: 0.243 - 0.397 95% confidence interval: 0.227 - 0.413 99% confidence interval: 0.195 - 0.445
Selected Clusters Time of selection: 02/26/2014 - 20:32:30 No. DESA Numb er of HHs No. of Selecte d Populati o n Size No. of Eligible people per House- P e o p l e 1 Keude Aceh 148 2 1006 133 133 1.00 2 Sangso 150 1 1020 135 135 1.00 3 Pante Rheng 158 1 1074 142 142 1.00 7 Namploh Krueng 52 2 354 47 47 1.00 8 Namploh Papeun 65 1 442 59 59 1.00 11 Meuliek 367 4 2496 331 330 1.00 12 Kandang 107 1 728 96 96 1.00 17 Meurah 112 2 762 101 101 1.00 22 Mesjid Baro 60 1 406 54 54 1.00 24 Darussalam 80 1 544 72 72 1.00 25 Bate Iliek 131 1 891 118 118 1.00 36 Alue Barat 39 2 265 35 35 1.00 37 KP.Baro 87 1 592 78 78 1.00 38 Pineung Siribe 74 1 503 67 67 1.00 40 Matang Teungoh 102 4 694 92 92 1.1 41 , Tanjong Baro 143 2 972 129 129 1.00 43 Meunasah Lancok 41 2 279 37 37 1.00 44 Mns. Puuk 48 1 326 43 43 1.00 Total 1964 30 13356 1769 1768 1.00
