98
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Aisyah, Nyimas,dkk. (2007). Pengembangan pembelajaran simetri lipat SD. Jakarta: Dirjen Dikti Depdiknas.
Arikunto, S. (2012). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi aksara.
Batanero, C., Godino, J.D., & Navarro-Pelayo, V. (1997). Combinatorial reasoning and its assessment. Dalam I. Gal & J.B. Garfield (Penyunting),
The assesment challenge in statistics education (hlm. 239-252). Amsterdam:
International Statistical Institute & I.O.S. Press.
Bell, E.T. (1987). Mathematics, queen and servant of Science. Washington: Tempus Books of Microsoft Press in Cooperative with the Mathematical Association of Amerika (Inc).
Borba, R., Azevedo, J., & Barreto, F. (2015). Using tree diagrams to develop combinatorial reasoning of children and adults in early schooling. Dalam K. Krainer & N. Vondrova (Penyunting), Proceedings of the Ninth Congress of
the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (hlm.
2480-2486). Prague: CERME 9 - Ninth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education.
Connes, A. (2010). A view of mathematics. Perancis: Institute des Hautes Etudes Scientifiques.
Drost & Todorovich, (2013). Enhancing cognitive understanding to improve fundamental movement skills. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation,
and Dance, 84, hlm. 54-59.
Eizenberg, M.M. & Zaslavzky, O. (2009). Students' verification strategies for combinatorial problems. Mathematics thinking and learning, 6 (1), hlm. 15-36.
Ekwueme, C.O. & Merekmiwu, A.N. (2013). Teachers’ characteristics and students degree of errors in different content areas in senior secondary certificate examination in mathematics. Journal of Education and Practice, 4 (1), hlm. 57-62.
English, L.D. (1991). Young children's combinatoric strategies. Educational
Studies in Mathematics, 22, hlm. 451-474.
English, L.D. (1993). Children's strategies and reasoning processes in solving novel combinatorial and deductive problems. Dalam B. Atweh, C. Kanes, M. Carss, & G. Booker (Penyunting), Contexts in mathematics education: Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Mathematics
Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 235-240). Brisbane:
99
English, L.D. (2007). Children’s strategies for solving two-and three-dimensional combinatorial problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24(3), hlm. 255–273.
English, L.D. (2005). Combinatorics and the development of children's combinatorial reasoning. Dalam G.A. Jones (Penyunting), Exploring
probability in school (hlm. 121-141). New York: Springer.
Feldhaus, A.C. (2014). How pre service elementary school teachers’ mathematical dispositions are influenced by school mathematics. American International
Journal of Contemporary Research, 4 (6), hlm. 91-97.
Fraenkel, J.R. & Wallen, N.E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in
education. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Germain, J.L. (2013). Guided discovery: A twentieth century model proves useful in the twenty-first century classroom. United States Military Academy, 20 (12).
Godino, J.D., Batanero, C., & Font, V. (2007). The onto-semiotic approach to research in mathematics education. The International Journal on
Mathematics Education, 39 (1), hlm. 127-135.
Godino, J.D., Batanero, C., & Roa, R. (2005). An onto-semiotic analysis of combinatorial problems and the solving processes by university students.
Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60, hlm. 3–36.
Graumann, G. (2002). General aims of mathematics education explained with
examples in geometry teaching. Palermo: The Mathematics Education into
the 21st Century Project.
Gurganus, S. (2006). Math instruction for students with learning problems. Ohio: Pearson Education.
Hake, R.R. (1999). Analyzing change/gain scores. Woodland Hills: Indiana University.
Halani, A. (2013). Students’ ways of thinking about combinatorics solution sets. (Disertasi). Arizona State University, Arizona, Amerika Serikat.
Karim, A. (2011). Penerapan metode penemuan terbimbing dalam pembelajaran matematika untuk meningkatkan pemahaman konsep dan kemampuan
berpikir kritis siswa sekolah dasar. (Tesis). Universitas Pendidikan
Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia.
Harris, J.M., Hirst, J.L., & Mossinghoff, M.J. (2008). Combinatorics and graph
theory. New York: Springer.
100
Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika (hlm. 164-171).
Surakarta: Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Isjoni. (2009). Cooperatif Learning. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Isnaeni & Maya, R. (2014). Meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi dan disposisi matematik siswa sekolah menengah atas melalui pembelajaran generatif.
Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 19 (2), hlm.
159-165.
Kavousian, S. (2008). Enquiries into undergraduate students’ understanding of
combinatorial structures. (Disertasi). Simon Fraser University, Burnady,
Kanada.
Lawson, A.E. (1978). The development and validation of a classroom test of formal reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 15 (1), hlm. 11-24.
Lockwood, E. (2013). A model of students’ combinatorial thinking: The role of
sets of outcomes. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32, hlm. 251-265.
Mahmudi, A. (2010). Tinjauan asosiasi antara kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis dan disposisi matematis. Prosiding Seminar Nasional
Pendidikan Matematika 17. Yogyakarta: Himpunan Mahasiswa Jurusan
Pendidikan Matematika FMIPA Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Mahmuzah, R., Ikhsan, M., & Yusrizal. (2014). Peningkatan kemampuan berfikir kritis dan disposisi matematis siswa SMP dengan menggunakan pendekatan
problem posing. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 1 (2), hlm. 43-53.
Mandur, K., Sadra, I.W., & Suparta, I.N. (2013). Kontribusi kemampuan koneksi, kemampuan representasi, dan disposisi matematis terhadap prestasi belajar matematika siswa SMA swasta di Kabupaten Manggarai. E-Journal
Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Ganesha, 2, hlm. 36-45.
Martadipura, B.A.P. (2012). Disposisi statistis siswa dalam pembelajaran statistika dasar. Jurnal Infinity STKIP Siliwangi Bandung, 1 (2), hlm. 169-177.
Markaban. (2006). Model pembelajaran matematika dengan model penemuan
terbimbing. Yogyakarta: P4TK matematika Yogyakarta.
McGalliard, W.A. (2012). Constructing sample space with combinatorial
reasoning: a mixed methods study. (Disertasi). The University of North
Carolina, North Carolina, Amerika Serikat.
Meltzer, D.E. 2002. The relationship between mathematics preparation and
conceptual learning gains in physics: A possible “hidden variable” in
101
Mosston, M. (1966). Teaching physical education. Ohio: Charles E. Merrill Books Inc.
Muriana & Hasratuddin. (2014). Peningkatan kemampuan komunikasi dan disposisis matematik siswa SMA di Kecamatan Medan Area dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe grup investigasi (GI).
Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Paradikma, 7 (1), hlm. 87-101.
Muslim, A.P. (2016). Penerapan TAPPS disertai hypnoteaching (Hypno-TAPPS) dalam meningkatkan disposisi matematis siswa SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Unsika, 4 (1), hlm. 1-16.
Mwamwenda, T.S. (2010). Undergraduate and graduate students’ combinatorial
reasoning and formal operations. The Journal of Genetic Psychology:
Research and Theory on Human Development, 160 (4), hlm. 503-506.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Commission on Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM). (1989). Curriculum and evaluation
standards for school mathematics. Reston VA: The Council.
Nur, A.S. & Rahman, A. (2013). Pemecahan masalah matematika sebagai sarana mengembangkan penalaran formal siswa sekolah menengah pertama. Jurnal
Sainsmat, II (1), hlm. 84-92.
Palmer, H. & Bommel J.V. (2015). Exploring the role of representations when
young children solve a combinatorial task. [online]. Diakses dari
http://ncm.gu.se/media/madif10/madif_001_palmer_vanbommel.pdf.
Peraturan Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 64 Tahun 2013 tentang Standar Isi Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
Putri, F.E.N., Maonde, F., & Kadir. (2014). Perbedaan hasil belajar ditinjau dari pembelajaran kooperatif, perilaku berkarakter, dan disposisi matematis.
Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5 (2), hlm. 121-134.
Ramdani, Y. (2012). Pengembangan instrumen dan bahan ajar untuk meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi, penalaran, dan koneksi matematis dalam konsep integral.. Jurnal penelitian pendidikan, 13(1), hlm. 44-52.
Rezaie, M. & Gooya, Z.. (2011). What do i mean by combinatorial thinking?,
Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 11, hlm. 122-126.
Sefalianti, B. (2014). Penerapan pendekatan inkuiri terbimbing terhadap kemampuan komunikasi dan disposisi matematis siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan
dan Keguruan, 1 (2), hlm. 11-20.
102
Psychology of Mathematics Education (hlm. 170-177). Atlanta: Georgia
State University.
Stacey, K. (2007). What is mathematical thinking and why is it important?. [Online]. Diakses dari http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi= 10.1.1.464.74&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
Steffe, L.P. (1992). Schemes of action and operation involving composite units.
Learning and Individual Difference, 4(3). hlm. 259-309
Stevens, Victoria. (2014). To think without thinking: The implications of combinatory play and the creative process for neuroaesthetics. American
Journal of Play, 7 (1), hlm. 99-119.
Sugilar, H. (2013). Meningkatkan kemampuan berfikir kreatif dan disposisi matematik siswa madrasah tsanawiyah melalui pembelajaran generative. Infinity, 2 (2), hlm. 156-168.
Sugiyono. (2011). Metode penelitian pendidikan: pendekatan kuantitatif,
kualitatif, dan r&d. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2012). Statistika untuk penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suharsono. (2015). Meningkatkan kemampuan pemahaman dan disposisi matematik siswa SMA menggunakan teknik probing prompting. Edusentris
Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 2 (3), hlm. 278-289.
Suherman, E. (2001). Evaluasi proses dan hasil belajar matematika. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.
Sumarmo, U., dkk. (2012). Kemampuan dan disposisi berpikir logis, kritis, dan kreatif matematik: Eksperimen terhadap siswa SMA menggunakan pembelajaran berbasis masalah dan strategi think-talk-write. Jurnal
Pengajaran Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 17 (1), hlm. 17-33.
Sumirat, L.A. (2014). Efektifitas startegi pembelajaran kooperatif tipe
think-talk-write (TTW) terhadap kemampuan komunikasi dan disposisi matematis
siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Keguruan, 1 (2), hlm. 21-29.
Syaban, M. (2009). Menumbuhkembangkan daya dan disposisi matematis siswa sekolah menengah atas melalui pembelajaran invertigasi. Educationist, 3 (2), hlm. 129-136.
Weissglass, J. (2012). Listen first, then teach. Phi Delta Kappan, 93, hlm. 29-33.
Widdiharto, S. (2004). Model-model pembelajaran. Jakarta: Gema Pena.
Wijayanto, Z. (2014). Eksperimentasi model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe
think-pair-share (TPS) dengan pendekatan open-ended ditinjai dari disposisi
matematis siswa kelas vii SMP negeri di Kabupaten Purworejo. Jurnal
103
Yonandi & Sumarmo, U. (2012). Mathematical communication ability and disposition: Experiment with grade-11 students using contextual teaching with computer assissted. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika dan Ilmu
Pengetahuan Alam, 17 (2), hlm. 142-156.
Yuliani, K. & Saragih, S. 2015. The Development of Learning Devices Based Guided Discovery Model to Improve Understanding Concept and Critical Thinking Mathematically Ability of Students at Islamic Junior High School of Medan. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(24). hlm. 116-128.
Yulianti, D.E., Wuryanto, & Darmo. (2013). Keefektifan model eliciting activities pada kemampuan penalaran dan disposisi matematis siswa. Unnes Journal
