68
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
1. Kishen A. Mechanisms and risk factors for fracture predilection in
endodontically treated teeth. Endodontic Topics 2006; 13: 57-79.
2. Torabi K, Fattahi F. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored
by different FRC posts: an in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res 2009; 20(3): 282-5.
3. Ree M, Schwartz RS. The endo-restorative interface: current concepts. Dent Clin
N Am 2010; 54: 349-50.
4. Sadeghi M. A comparison of the fracture resistance of endodontically treated
teeth using three different post systems. J of Dent 2006; 3(2): 69-70.
5. Kivanc BH, Alacam T, Ulosoy O.I.A, Genc O, Gorgul G. Fracture resistance of
thin-walled roots restored with different post systems. Int Endodon J 2009; 42:
997-1001.
6. Kim M, Jung W, OH S, Hattori M, Yoshinara M, Kawada E et.al. Flexural
properties of three kinds of experimental fiber-reinforced composite posts. Dent
Mater J 2010; 30(1): 38.
7. Ayna B, Celenk S, Atakul F, Uysal E. Three-year clinical evaluation of
endodontically treated anterior teeth restored with a polyethylene fiber-reinforced
composite. Aus Dent J 2009; 54: 136-7.
8. Putignano A, Poderi G, Cerutti A et al. An in vitro study on the adhesion of
quartz fiber post to radicular dentin. J Adhes Dent 2007; 9: 463-467.
9. Mendoca L, Mello A, Fernanda M, Batista PM, Ricardo VC, Cecilia M.
Influence of different adhesive systems on the pull-out bond strength of glass
fiber posts. J Appl Oral Sci 2008; 16(3): 232-3.
10. Al Zahrani F. Influence of post length on the bond strength of fiber post and
fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. Thesis. Saudi Arabia: Master
of Science Degree in Dentistry Department of Prosthetic Dental sciences, 2010:
14-25.
69
11. Ferrari M, Breschi L, Mazzoni A. Fiber post and endodontically treated teeth: A
compendium of scientific and clinical perspective. 1st ed. South Afrika: Modern
Dentistry Media, 2008: 16-25.
12. Grande da Cruz FZ, Grande CZ, Roderjan DA, Arrais CA et.al. Effect of
etch-and-rinse and self-etching adhesive systems on hardness uniformity of resin
cements after glass fiber post cementation. Eur J Dent 2012; 6(3): 284-6.
13. Tay FR, Suh BI, Pashley DH, Prati C, Chuang S, Feng Li. Factors contributing to
the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and self-cured or
dual-cured composites. Part II. Single-bottle, total-etch adhesive. J Adhes Dent 2003;
5: 91-105.
14. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Monoblock in root canals – a hypothetical or tangible goal.
J Endod 2007; 33(4): 391-8.
15. Rathke A, Balz U, Munche R, Haller B. Effect of self-curing activator and curing
protocol on the bond strength of composite core buildups. J Adhes Dent 2012;
14: 39-46.
16. Faria-e-silva AL, Reis AF, Martins LR. The effect of luting techniques on the
push-out bond strength of fiber posts. Braz J Oral Sci 2008: 7(27): 1653-6.
17. Cavalcanti SCSXB, Olievera MT, Arais CAG, Giannini M. The effect of the
presence and presentation mode of co-initiators on the microtensile bond strength
of dual-cured adhesive systems used in indirect restorations. Op Dent 2008;
33(6): 682-9.
18. Arrais CAG, Glannini M, Rueggeberg FA. Effect of sodium sulfinate salts on the
polymerization characteristics of dual-cured resin cement systems exposed to
attenuated light-activation. J Dent 2009; 37: 219-26.
19. Malyk Y, Kaaden C, Hickel R, Ilie N. Analysis of resin tags formation in root
canal dentine: a cross sectional study. Int J Endodont 2010; 43: 47-55.
20. La Bell-Ronnlof AM. Fiber-reinforced composites as root canal posts. Thesis.
Turku : Department of Prosthetic Dentistry and Biomaterials science, 2007:
10-35.
70
21. Garaushi S, Vallittu P. Fiber-reinforced composites in fixed partial dentures.
Libyan J Med 2006; 1: 75.
22. Ganesh M, Tandon S. Versatility of Ribbond in contemporary dental practice.
Trends Biometer 2006; 20(1): 53-57.
23. Farahanny W. Perbedaan fracture resistance sistem pasak customized
polyethylene fiber reinforced dengan menggunakan bentuk anyaman pita braided
dan locked-sticthed threads pada restorasi pasca perawatan endodonti. Tesis.
Medan : Program Studi Magister (S2) Ilmu Kedokteran Gigi FKG USU, 2013:
18-30.
24. Nithipratheep A, Leevailoj C. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth : The
monoblock concept. CU Dent J 2011; 34: 143.
25. Asgar S, Ali A, Somoro S, Rashid S. Antimicrobial solutions used for root canal
disinfection. Pakistan oral & dental jurnal 2013; 33(1): 165-8.
26. Jindal S, Jindal R, Gupta K, Mahajan S, Garg S. Comparative evaluation of the
reinforcing effect of different post systems in the restoration of endodontically
treated human anterior teeth at two different length of post space preparation-An
in vitro study. Jdt tums 2013; 10(2): 124-30.
27. Monticelli F, Ferrari M, Toledano M. Cement system and surface treatment
selection for fiber post luting. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2008; 13(3):
E214-6.
28. O’Brien WJ. Dental materials and their selection. 4th ed., Canada: quintessence
books, 2008: 114-23.
29. Suh BI, Feng Li, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Factors contributing to the
incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically cured or
dual-cured composites. Part III. Effect of acidic resin monomers. J Adhes Dent 2003;
5: 267-82.
30. Amussen E. Peutzfeldt A. Bonding of dual-curing resin cements to dentin. J
Adhes Dent 2006; 8: 299-04.
31. Dentsply. Self-cure activator.
http://www.dentsply.es/DFU/eng/Self-Cure%20Activator_eng.pdf//
71
32. Landuyt K, Snauwaert J, Munck JD, Peumans M, Yoshida Y et.al. Systematic
review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. J
Biomaterials 2007; 28: 3757-80.
33. Kim YK, Chun JN. Kwon PC, Kim KH, Kwon TY. Polymerization kinetics of
dual-curing adhesive systems when used solely or in conjunction with
chemically-cured resin cement. J Adhes Dent 2013; 15(5): 453-59.
34. Powers JM, Sakaguchi RL. Craig’s restorative dental material. 12th ed. Missouri:
Mosbi Elsevier, 2006: 150-3.
35. Hanafiah KA. Rancangan percobaan. 3th ed. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo, 2003: 9.
36. Soares CJ, Pereira JC, Valdivia ADCM, Novais VR, Meneses MS. Influence of
resin cement and post configuration on bond strength to root dentin.
37. De Moraes AP, Cenci MD, Ratto de Moraes R, Pereira-Cenci T. Current concept
on the use and adhesive bonding of glass-fiber post in dentistry: a review.
Applied Adhesion Science 2013; 1(4): 1-7.
38. Cardoso MV, Neves A. Mine A et al. Current aspects on bonding effectiveness
and stability in adhesive dentistry. Australian Dent J 2011; 56(1): 31-44.
39. Schwartz RS, Robbins JW. Post placement and restoration of endodontically
treated teeth: A Literature review. J Endodont 2004; 30(5): 289-97.
40. Meng QF, Chen YM, Guang HB, Yip KHK, Smales RJ. Effect of a ferrule and
increased clinical crown length on the in vitro fracture resistance of premolar
restored using two dowel-and-core systems. Op Dent 2007: 32(6): 585-02.
41. Padmanabhan P. A comparative evaluation of the fracture resistance of three
different pre-fabricated post in endodontically treated teeth : An in vitro study. J
Conserv Dent 2010; 13(3): 127.
42. Faria-e-Silva AL, Casselli DS, Lima GS, Ogliari FA, Piva E, Martin LR.
Kinetics of conversion of two dual-cured adhesive systems. J Endod 2008; 34(9):
1115. (abstrak).
43. Choi SK. Yum JW. Kim HC. Hur B. Park JK. Effect an intermediate bonding
resin and flowable resin on the compatibility of two-step total etching adhesives
with a self-curing composite resin. 2009; 34(5): 397-403.
