R E H T O M N W O ’ S E N O G N I K A M H C T A M F O G N I N A E M E H T , N O R A H S D N A , E C U R B , Y E N R U O G I S N I N E E S S A S ’ H T I M S D L O G A I V I L O F O S R E T C A R A H C N I A M E H T MARRYINGMOM A SARJANAPENDIDIKANTHESIS s t n e m e r i u q e R e h t f o t n e m ll if l u F l a it r a P s a d e t n e s e r P e h t n i a t b O o t Sa jranaPendidikanDegree n o it a c u d E e g a u g n a L h s il g n E n i y B it n a y a ji W h a d n E s e n g A 3 3 1 4 1 2 1 6 0 : r e b m u N t n e d u t S M A R G O R P Y D U T S N O I T A C U D E E G A U G N A L H S I L G N E N O I T A C U D E S T R A D N A E G A U G N A L F O T N E M T R A P E D N O I T A C U D E D N A G N I N I A R T S R E H C A E T F O Y T L U C A F Y T I S R E V I N U A M R A H D A T A N A S A T R A K A Y G O Y 1 1 0 2
i E N O G N I K A M H C T A M F O G N I N A E M E H T S’ OWNMOTHER , N O R A H S D N A , E C U R B , Y E N R U O G I S N I N E E S S A S ’ H T I M S D L O G A I V I L O F O S R E T C A R A H C N I A M E H T MARRYINGMOM A SARJANAPENDIDIKANTHESIS s t n e m e r i u q e R e h t f o t n e m ll if l u F l a it r a P s a d e t n e s e r P e h t n i a t b O o t Sa jranaPendidikanDegree n o it a c u d E e g a u g n a L h s il g n E n i y B it n a y a ji W h a d n E s e n g A 3 3 1 4 1 2 1 6 0 : r e b m u N t n e d u t S M A R G O R P Y D U T S N O I T A C U D E E G A U G N A L H S I L G N E N O I T A C U D E S T R A D N A E G A U G N A L F O T N E M T R A P E D N O I T A C U D E D N A G N I N I A R T S R E H C A E T F O Y T L U C A F Y T I S R E V I N U A M R A H D A T A N A S A T R A K A Y G O Y 1 1 0 2
ii i
v i
o
t
s
i
s
e
h
t
s
i
h
t
e
t
a
c
i
d
e
d
m
y
b
e
l
o
v
e
d
f
a
m
li
y
,
w
h
o
a
l
w
a
y
s
h
a
v
e
t
h
e
i
r
f
a
ti
h
,
e
m
n
i
e
v
e
il
e
b
d
n
a
,
e
v
o
l
r
i
e
h
t
e
v
i
g
t
h
a
t
I
a
m
a
b
l
e
t
o
if
n
i
s
h
t
h
i
s
t
h
e
s
i
s
.
.
d
r
a
h
s
i
ti
k
n
i
h
t
u
o
y
n
e
h
w
d
r
a
h
s
t
e
g
e
fi
L
.
g
n
i
h
t
y
n
a
t
u
o
b
a
t
e
g
r
o
f
t
s
u
j
d
n
a
e
l
p
m
i
s
e
b
o
t
e
v
a
h
e
w
s
e
m
it
e
m
o
S
)
s
u
o
m
y
n
o
n
A
(
v Y T I L A N I G I R O S ’ K R O W F O T N E M E T A T S s i h t t a h t e r a l c e d y lt s e n o h I thesis ,which Ihavew irtten ,doe sno tcontaint hework e h t n i d e ti c e s o h t t p e c x e , e l p o e p r e h t o f o k r o w e h t f o s tr a p r o quotaiton sand t he . d l u o h s r e p a p c if it n e i c s a s a , s e c n e r e f e r , a tr a k a y g o Y 02Novembe r2011 r e ti r W e h T it n a y a ji W h a d n E s e n g A 3 3 1 4 1 2 1 6 0
i v H A I M L I A Y R A K I S A K I L B U P N A U J U T E S R E P N A A T A Y N R E P R A B M E L S I M E D A K A N A G N I T N E P E K K U T N U : a m r a h D a t a n a S s a ti s r e v i n U a w s i s a h a m a y a s ,i n i h a w a b i d n a g n a t a d n a tr e b g n a Y a m a N : Agne sEndahWjiayanit a w s i s a h a M r o m o N : 061214133 n a a k a t s u p r e P a d a p e k n a k ir e b m e m a y a s , n a u h a t e g n e p u m li n a g n a b m e g n e p i m e D jr e b g n a y a y a s h a i m li a y r a k a m r a h D a t a n a S s a ti s r e v i n U udu :l N E E S S A R E H T O M N W O S ’ E N O G N I K A M H C T A M F O G N I N A E M E H T S R E T C A R A H C N I A M E H T , N O R A H S D N A , E C U R B , Y E N R U O G I S N I T I M S D L O G A I V I L O F O H’SMARRYINGMOM. n a k ir e b m e m a y a s n a i k i m e d n a g n e D . ) a d a a li b ( n a k u lr e p i d g n a y t a k g n a r e p a tr e s e b , n a p m i y n e m k u t n u k a h a m r a h D a t a n a S s a ti s r e v i n U n a a k a t s u p r e P a d a p e k n a l a k g n a p k u t n e b m a l a d a y n a l o l e g n e m , n i a l a i d e m k u t n e b m a l a d n a k h il a g n e m k i s u b ir t s i d n e m , a t a d an secara t erbatas ,dan mempubilkasikannyadi i nterne tatau a y a s i r a d n ij i a t n i m e m u lr e p a p n a t s i m e d a k a n a g n it n e p e k k u t n u n i a l a i d e m a y a s a m a n n a k m u t n a c n e m p a t e t a m a l e s a y a s a d a p e k i tl a y o r n a k ir e b m e m n u p u a m . s il u n e p i a g a b e s s g n a y i n i n a a t a y n r e p n a i k i m e D ayabua tdengans ebenarnya . a tr a k a y g o Y , 02Novembe r2011 n a k a t a y n e m g n a Y (Agne sEndahWjiayan it)
ii v T C A R T S B A it n a y a ji W ,Agne sEndah .(2011) .TheMeaning o fMatch Making On s’ e Own Mother a sSeen i n Sigourney ,Bruce ,and Sharon ,the Main Character so f G a i v il O oldsmtih’ sMarrying Mom. Yogyakatra :Engilsh Language Educaiton s r e h c a e T f o y tl u c a F , n o it a c u d E s tr A d n a e g a u g n a L f o t n e m tr a p e D , m a r g o r P y d u t S r a h D a t a n a S , n o it a c u d E d n a g n i n i a r T maUniverstiy. s e s s u c s i d s i s e h t s i h T two o fAme ircan values a sexercised by Sigourney , d n a , e c u r B Sharon, the majo rcharacter sof Oilvia Goldsmtih’ sMarrying Mom . o t s r e k a m h c t a m e h t e m o c e b o t a e d i ri e h t t u o d n if o t s i y d u t s s i h t f o e s o p r u p e h T t o m r i e h t her .Therearet wo quesitonst o answer in t hi sstudy :“How are Phylils , ” ? l e v o n e h t n i d e t c i p e d n o r a h S d n a , e c u r B , y e n r u o g i S and “How did t heydecide o t becomet hei rmother’ smatchmakers ”? y d u t s s i h T i sa ilbraryresearch . tI sp irmarydataist henove l tisefl ,whliet he d e s u s e ir o e h t e h T . t e n r e t n i e h t d n a , s l a n r u o j ,s k o o b m o r f n e k a t e r a s e n o y r a d n o c e s e r a the t heory o fcharacte rand characteirzaiton, t heory o fapproache ,s t heory o f . s e u l a v n a c ir e m A f o y r o e h t e h t d n a , n o it a v it o m T he approach used i s . h c a o r p p a l a c i g o l o h c y s p tl u s e r e h T s o fthi sstudy a : rire f st i sabou tthe character so fPhylils , e t c a r a h c e h T . n o r a h S d n a , e c u r B , y e n r u o g i S r s o f Phylil s are upsetitng and e M . e t a r e p s e d d n a g n it a n i m o d e r a y e n r u o g i S f o s r e t c a r a h c e h T . n r o b b u t s anwhil , e r e t c a r a h c e h t o fBruce i ssensiitve ,and the las tthe character so fSharon are c it s a n o e l p d n a d e t a rt s u r f . s e h T econd resutls o fthi sstudy a re divided into two patrs ,the surface . g n i n a e m r e p e e d e h t d n a g n i n a e m Thesurfacemeaningexplainst heaciton sdone e h t o s l a d n a s r e k a m h c t a m s ’ r e h t o m r i e h t g n i m o c e b n i s g n il b i s e e r h t e h t y b s n o it a v it o m which they have . Meanwhlie, the deepe r meaning explain s the r i e h t r o f s r e k a m h c t a m g n i m o c e b f o s n o it c a r i e h t e il r e d n u h c i h w s e u l a v n a c ir e m A o M .m n o r a h S d n a , e c u r B , y e n r u o g i S , l e v o n e h t n i d n u o f s e c n e d i v e e h t n o d e s a B s i c r e x e ed t he Ameircan values ,which arethe i ndividuailsm and p irvacy and t he fl e s -helpvalueast her easons ort henatureoft hei racitons inmatch making t hei r r e h t o m r i e h t t n a w t o n o d y e h T . s il l y h P , m o M n w o to interfere in thei rlfies . s i t a h T . y c a v ir p r i e h t e d u rt n i ll i w m o M r i e h t t a h t t n a w t o n o d o s l a y e h t ,s e d i s e B o s e b l li w e r e h t t a h t o s , m o M r i e h t r o f d n a b s u h a d n if o t d e d i c e d y e h t y h w meone l li w o h w give he rsecurtiy ,companionship ,atteniton ,and also itme ,a sa way t o e k a m thei rmothe rhappyandt oi mprovet hei rownl fie. a i c e p s e e g d e l w o n k n e d a o r b o t d e s u e b n a c l e v o n s i h T lly on Ame ircan s e d i s e B . s e u l a v ,t hi snove lcanbeusedt o t eachCros sCutlura lUnderstandingf o r . m a r g o r P y d u t S n o it a c u d E e g a u g n a L h s il g n E f o s t n e d u t s e h t
ii i v K A R T S B A it n a y a ji W ,Agne sEndah .(2011) .TheMeaning o fMatch Making On s’ e Own S s a r e h t o M een in Sigourney ,Bruce ,and Sharon ,the Main Character so f G a i v il O oldsmtih’ sMarrying Mom. Yogyakatra : Program Stud iPendidikan , i n e S n a d a s a h a B n a k i d i d n e P n a s u r u J ,s ir g g n I a s a h a B Fakutla sKeguruandan lImu n a k i d i d n e P ,Universtia sSanataDharma . n e t s a l u g n e m i n i i s p ir k S tang dua dar i nliai-nlia i kehidupan penduduk ir e m A kasepetr iyang dialam ioleh Sigourney ,Bruce ,dan Sharonm t okoh utama h ti m s d l o G a i v il O l e v o n i r a d Marrying Mom .Tujuan dar isk irpsii n iadalahuntuk . ir i d n e s a k e r e m u b I k u t n u h o d o j i r a c n e p i d a j n e m k u t n u a k e r e m e d i i u h a t e g n e m s u r a h g n a y n a a y n a tr e p a u d a d A djiawab dalam sk irps i ini , yang petrama ” ? l e v o n m a l a d n a k r a b m a g i d n o r a h S n a d , e c u r B , y e n r u o g i S , s il l y h P a n a m i a g a B “ u b i k u t n u h o d o j i r a c n e p i d a j n e m k u t n u n a k s u t u m e m a k e r e m a n a m i a g a B “ n a d . ” ? a k e r e m l a d a a y n a m a t u a t a D . a k a t s u p i d u t s h a u b e s h a l a d a i n i i s p ir k S ah nove l tiu u k u b i r a d l i b m a i d a u d e k a t a d n a k g n a d e s , ir i d n e s -buku, j urnal ,dan i nterne.t Teor i i r o e T , n a t a k e d n e P i r o e T , i s a s ir e t k a r a K n a d r e t k a r a K i r o e T h a l a d a n a k a n u g i d g n a y i a li N i r o e T n a d , i s a v it o M -nlia iKehidupan Penduduk Ameirka. Pendekatan yang n u g i d akanadalahpendekatans ecarapsikologi .s i r a d r e t k a r a k g n a t n e t a m a tr e p g n a y , h a l a d a i n i n a it il e n e p i r a d l i s a H Phylils , , y e n r u o g i S Bruce ,d na Sharon .Karakte rdar iPhylil sadalah seorang ibu yang n a k a w e c e g n e m dan kera skepala .Karakte rdar iSigourney adalah menguasa idan i r a d r e t k a r a k n a k g n a d e S . a s a s u t u p Bruce adalah sanga tmudah t ersinggung dan s u r f h a l a d a n o r a h S i r a d r e t k a r a k r i h k a r e t g n a y tas idanbelrebihan . n a it il e n e p i r a d a u d e k l i s a H in idibag imenjad idua bagian ,atr isecara e s i tr a n a d l a k g n a d cara mendalam .A tr isecara dangka lmenjelaskan mengena i n a k h o d o j n e m a y n a h a s u m a l a d t u b e s r e t a r a d u a s r e b a g it e k n a k u k a li d g n a y n a k a d n it m a l a d n e m a r a c e s i tr a n a k g n a d e S . a y n i s a d n a l e m g n a y i s a v it o m n a d a y n u b i i a li n i a n e g n e m n a k s a l e j n e m -nlia ikehidupan penduduk Ameirka yang mendasar i a k e r e m u b I k u t n u h o d o j ir a c n e p i d a j n e m m a l a d a k e r e m n a k a d n it it k u b n a k r a s a d r e B -bukt i yang diketemukan dalam novel , Sigourney , c u r B e d n , a Sharon mengalam in lia iindividuailsme dan kebebasan /keleluasaan n a d i d a b ir p n lia iuntuk menolong d ri isendri isebaga idasa rdar i itndakan mereka a k e r e m u b I k u t n u h o d o j i r a c n e p i d a j n e m m a l a d ,Phylils .Mereka itdak mau ibu a k e r e m u b I u a m k a d it a k e r e m , u ti n i a l e S . a k e r e m n a p u d i h e k u g g n a g g n e m a k e r e m e l O . a k e r e m i d a b ir p n a a s a u l e l e k / n a s a b e b e k u g g n a g g n e m h karena tiu mereka n a k a i t n a n a g g n i h e s , a k e r e m u b I k u t n u i m a u s g n a r o e s i r a c n e m k u t n u n a k s u t u m e m , n a m a a s a r a y n ir e b m e m g n a y g n a r o s e s a d a persahabatan ,perhaitan ,dan juga t a u s i a g a b e s , u t k a w u cara untuk membua t ibu mereka bahagia dan untuk i h e k i k i a b r e p m e m dupanmereka. m a t u r e t n a u h a t e g n e p s a u lr e p m e m k u t n u n a k a n u g i d t a p a d i n i l e v o N a pada i a li n -nlia ikehidupan penduduk Ameirka .Selain tiu ,nove lin ibisa digunakan n a k i d i d n e P a w s i s a h a m k u t n u g n i d n a t s r e d n U l a r u tl u C s s o r C r a j a g n e m k u t n u .s ir g g n I a s a h a B
x i S T N E M E G D E L W O N K C A s i H r o f , t s ir h C s u s e J y t h g i m l A y m k n a h t o t e k il d l u o w I , ll a f o t s ri F s i e H r o f , e fi l y m n i e c n e d i u g d n a g n i s s e l b giving me t he srtength t o beable to y m d n a s e m it d r a h e h t h g u o r h t d n e ir f t s e b y r e v y m s e m o c e b e H . s i s e h t s i h t h s i n if e h c a e t rf o rHet eache smet ohaveal tiltef atihi nmys el.f r e h r o f , . d P . S , i n e h a R i ti S a c i n o r e V , r e h t o m d e v o l e b y m k n a h t I , d n o c e S , o n o d n a H o li s u S s u n it s u g A . W , r e h t a f d e v o l e b y m d n a , e m r o f s r e y a r p d n a e v o l g n i v i g r o f m e h t k n a h t I . e fi l y m n i r e d a e l g n i z a m a n a h c u s g n i e b r o f ,. M . M , . d P . S e v o l ri e h t ,suppor,tandhavingfatihi nme ,andalsof o rbeilevingt ha t Ican ifnish s i s e h t s i h t . Ialso thank my brother ,Maritnu sDanang “Kopi rKosot” Susanta , , e fi w s i h d n a , . S . S M baPipti ,whoarealwaystheretos harej oke sandl ovef o rme , andmyl tilteangel ,NathaniellaQuinshaAdeilneSusanta,f o rbeingsuchanange l . y li m a f y m r o f I , d ri h T would ilke to give my thank sto my sponsor ,Drs .Antoniu s h P , . A . M , o t n a y ij u r e H .D. ,fo rgiving me guidance ,suppo tr ,and paitence du irng t n e m h s il p m o c c a s i s e h t y m ,andSiste rMargaretf o rbeing myproofr eaderf o rmy s i s e h t . Ialsot hankal lELSPl ecturer ,swhohavet augh tmei nvaluablel essons and . y ti s r e v i n U a m r a h D a t a n a S n i y d u t s y m g n ir u d e m d e p l e h k n a h t y m e v i g I , h tr u o F s to CEC’ sgilrs ,K ak Widdy ,M ba Dian ,Rista , y k z i R “kiyip” ,Kaje ,Indhay ,Yoana ,M ba TimTim ,and Mega. It hank t hem f o r ri e h t g n ir a h s spi ir,t l aughter ,and l ovedu irng my t hesi saccompilshment .Then , I k n a h t my PB I06 crew sAyu ,Ttia ,Deyc ,T iro ,Ceye ,Aik ,Adi tKoel ,Ztia ,
x k n e t n o G ,and t hosewhoarleadygavemet he rtemendou smoment ,sj oy,l aughter , e v o l d n a , p i h s d n e ir f ,s r a e t du irngours tudy. u b t s a L tno tleast , Ithank my brother ,Tau ifk Hidayanto ,S.Pd fo rhis e c n e it a p ,suppo tr ,andkindnesst ome .Heknows howhardi twasf ormet o ifnish e h t u b , y d u t s y m alway sannoye d mewtihhisreminderst ha t Ishould no tgiveup f d n a inisht hiss tudys oon. g n il li w s a w o h w e n o y r e v e k n a h t o t e k il d l u o w I , y ll a n i F tohelp me ifnish d l u o w I . s i s e h t s i h t have no t ifnishe d thi sthesi swtihou tthei rhelp ,suppo tr , . e v o l d n a , e c n e d i u g it n a y a ji W h a d n E s e n g A
i x S T N E T N O C F O E L B A T E G A P E L T I T ………. S E G A P L A V O R P P A ………. E G A P L A N O I T A C I D E D ………. Y T I L A N I G I R O S ' K R O W F O T N E M E T A T S ……….. I S A K I L B U P N A U J U T E S R E P N A A T A Y N R E P ………...…………... T C A R T S B A ……….. K A R T S B A ………... S T N E M E G D E L W O N K C A ………. S T N E T N O C F O E L B A T ……….. LISTOFAPPENDICES………... N O I T C U D O R T N I I R E T P A H C ……….. . A Backgroundoft heStudy……….... .. . B Objecitveoft heStudy………..……… . C ProblemFormulaiton …… ..……….. . D Benefti soft heStudy……….. .. . E De ifniiton so fTerm s………. E R U T A R E T I L D E T A L E R F O W E I V E R I I R E T P A H C ……….. . A AReviewo fRelatedTheo ires……….. . 1 Theoryo fCharacte randCharacteirzaiton ... . 2 Theoryo fApproaches ...…………... . 3 Theoryo fMoitvation……… . 4 Theoryo fAmeircanValue s………. . B Theoreitca lFramework ... . C Contex toft heNove l……….……… Y G O L O D O H T E M I I I R E T P A H C ……….. . A Objec toft heStudy………. .. e g a P i ii v i v i v i v i ii i v ix i x i x i 1 1 3 3 4 4 7 7 7 0 1 13 15 17 18 0 2 0 2
ii x . B Approachoft heStudy……….. . C Methodoft heStudy………. V I R E T P A H C ANALYSIS…………... . A TheCharacter so fPhylils ,Sigourney ,Bruce ,andSharon………. .. . 1 Phylil sGeronomous……… . 2 SigourneyGeronomou s……….. . 3 BruceGeronomou s………. . 4 SharonGeronomou s………... . B TheReasonWhySigourney ,Sharon ,andBruceDecidet oBecomeThei r … … … … … … … r e k a M h c t a M s ’ r e h t o M ……… ... . . 1 TheSurfaceMeaning……… .. . 2 TheDeepe rMeaning……….. S N O I T S E G G U S D N A S N O I S U L C N O C V R E T P A H C ……….. . A Conclusion s……….. . B Suggesiton s………... . 1 Suggesitonf o rFutureResearcher s………. . 2 Suggesitonf o rLecturer s………... S E C N E R E F E R ………. S E C I D N E P P A ……….. 1 X I D N E P P A Summary……….. 2 X I D N E P P A Biography………...…. 3 X I D N E P P A TheI mplementaitono fTeachingCros s Cutlura lUnderstanding………...………. 1 2 1 2 3 2 23 42 27 0 3 2 3 34 5 3 0 4 46 46 8 4 48 8 4 0 5 2 5 2 5 5 5 7 5
1 I R E T P A H C N O I T C U D O R T N I . n o it c u d o rt n I s i r e t p a h c t s ri f e h T Thi schapte rdiscusses ifve majo rpatrs , e r a y e h t the Background o fthe Study ,the Objecitve o fthe Study ,Problem n o it a l u m r o F ,Beneftisoft heStudy, and Deifniiton oft heTerm sused t hroughou t i w m e h t f o h c a E . y d u t s e h t l lbediscussedi ndetalisi nt hef ollowings eciton .s . A Backgroundoft heStudy s e r n e g e e r h t e h t f o e n o s i l e v o N in Ltierature .Abram s(1981 )say stha t “ s i l e v o n a ltierary work tha trelfect sthe realtiy o fhuman lfie by presenitng r i e h t d n a s s a l c l a i c o s r i e h t n o d e s a b s e v it o m r i e h t h ti w s r e t c a r a h c x e l p m o c s r e t c a r a h c r e h t o h ti w n o it c a r e t n i ” . ( p 120). Inothe rwords ,noveli sar elfecitono f h c n i a m e h t s t n e s e r p e r h c i h w e fi l n a m u h aracte/rt heauthor /humanlfieexpeirence l e v o n e s u s e k a m t i d n a ast hep irmarydata. i h ti m s d l o G nt henove lMarryingMomgivest heexampleoft her elfeciton . e fi l n a m u h f o Shegivest heclea rpictureo fAmeircan l fiestylet hrough ti smain ; s r e t c a r a h c Phylils ,Sigourney ,Bruce ,and Sharon .She give sa clea rpicture o f s n a c ir e m A lfie stylefrom t henegaitveand posiitve perspecitve swtihout l eaving r a r e ti l g n it ir w f o y t u a e b e h t ywork. o s l a h ti m s d l o G , s e d i s e B give sexplanaiton on how Ameircan people ilve . s r e h t o h ti w t c a r e t n i d n a Bygivingt heexplanaitononhowt heAmeircan ilveand r e h t o h ti w t c a r e t n i s , she give s the example o f Ameircan value s which are
d e s i c r e x e byAme ircan peoplei nt hei rdaliyl fiea sseen i n Sigourney ,Bruce ,and . n o r a h S g n i s y l a n a n i d e t s e r e t n i s a w I Marrying Mom becausethe novel i sunique e r a e r e h t d n a some reasons which make the nove lunique .Frist ,i ti sabout the , e lt it MarryingMom .Thef ris titmeI r eadt he itlte, Icould no t ifgureou thowt he e s u a c e b , e b d l u o w y r o t s tii suncommont ouset het ermmarryingfo rou rmother . d n o c e S ,i ti sabou tthe idea o fmatch-making Phylils ,one o fthe main h t s i s il l y h P . l e v o n e h t n i s r e t c a r a h c e mothe ro fSigourney ,Bruce ,and Sharon . r a h c n i a m e h t e r a y e h T acters i n t he novel .The t hree sibilng s rty t o become t he a e d i s i h T . m o M r i e h t r o f r e k a m h c t a m o fbecoming the match make rfo rthei r r o f n o m m o c n u s i m o m me ,because match making i susually appiled fo rthe .r e h t o m e h t r o f t o n d n a n e r d li h c s t c e p s a y n a m e r a e r e h T in the nove lwhich can be analysed ,bu tin thi s e h t n o s u c o f o t e k il d l u o w I y d u t s Ameircan value swhich are exercised by the l e v o n e h t n i s r e t c a r a h c n i a m .Goldsmtih depictst hecharactersi n t henove la san ir e m A can famliy whose member s ilve separatedly .Thi scondiiton make sthe g n it n e s e r p e r e r a s e c n e ir e p x e e s o h t d n a s e c n e ir e p x e y n a m e s i c r e x e s r e t c a r a h c u l a v n a c ir e m A e swhich Iwould ilket oanalyse . e d i e h t n o s u c o f o s l a d l u o w I , s e d i s e B a o fmatch making Phylils . Iwli l f o g n i n a e m e h t w o n k l li w I t a h t o s s il l y h P g n i k a m h c t a m f o s s e c o r p e h t e s y l a n a .s il l y h P g n i k a m h c t a m n i h ti m s d l o G Marrying Momtell saboutt hreesib ilngs ,Sigourney ,Bruce , n o r a h S d n a who ilve i n New York and t hei rMom ,Phylils ,who used t o l ive i n
d e v o m n e h t t u b a d ir o l F to NewYork i n ordert oge tclosewtihhert hreechlidren , bu t ti t urn sout t ha tSigourney ,Bruce ,and Sharon do no twant t o accommodate l li w m o M r i e h t t a h t k n i h t y e h t e s u a c e b , e s u o h r i e h t n i m o M n w o r i e h t only ruin . e fi l ri e h t Finally, eth y decided t o make t hei rMom get marired, so t here wli lbe . m o M r i e h t f o e r a c e k a t l li w o h w e n o e m o s Bu tthing shappen on the way they t e g m o M r i e h t e k a m marired and those thing swli lmake thei rrelaitonship a sa w o r g y li m a f rts onge.r e h t n o d e s a B incidencesi n lfieoft he main character so fMarrying Mom , e c u r B , y e n r u o g i S ,and Sharon, Iwan tto analyse the meaning o fidea o fmatch e c u r B , y e n r u o g i S y b s il l y h P g n i k a m ,andSharon. y d u t S e h t f o s e v it c e j b O . B o t s i y d u t s s i h t f o e s o p r u p e h T ifndou tthemeaningo fbecoming amatch n i n e e s s a r e k a m Sigourney ,Bruce ,and Sharon ,the main character so fOilvia s ’ h ti m s d l o G MarryingMom . . C ProblemFormula iton f o m r o f n i s m e l b o r p e h t d e t a l u m r o f e v a h I , k c a rt n o s i s y l a n a e h t p e e k o T . w o l e b d e n o it n e m s a s n o it s e u q . 1 HowarePhylils ,Sigourney ,Bruce ,andSharondepictedint henovel? . 2 How did Sigourney ,Bruce ,and Sharon decide t o become t hei rmother’ s a m h c t a m k er?
y d u t S e h t f o s ti f e n e B . D a e r e h T res evera lbenefti sachieved byconducitngt hiss tudyasf ollows: . 1 Readers . e l y t s e fi l n a c ir e m A f o e r u t c i p r a e l c a s r e d a e r e h t e v i g y a m y d u t s s i h T tI s e v i g o s l a an explanaiton on how Ameircan people ilveand i nterac twtih others . l li w y d u t s s i h T also give t he reader sexplanaiton on Ameircan value swhich are e fi l y li a d r i e h t n i e l p o e p n a c ir e m A y b d e y o l p m e . . 2 Student so fLanguageEduca iton u t s e h t e v i g y a m y d u t s s i h T dent sa clea rexample o fAmeircan cutlure , especially f o rstudent swho t akeCros sCutlura lUnderstandingsubject .Fromt hi s n a c y e h t y d u t s see t he Ameircan l fiestyle .Besides ,student swli lalso learn and w t c a r e t n i d n a e v il e l p o e p n a c ir e m A w o h d n a t s r e d n u tih others .Moreove,r thi s s e v i g o s l a y d u t s a clea rexampleand explanaiton on Ameircan value swhich are f o s r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t y b d e s i c r e x e MarryingMom. . 3 Lecturers e b l li w y d u t s s i h t t a h t e v e il e b I , e r u tl u c n a c ir e m A h ti w s l a e d y d u t s s i h t s A e b ne ifcia lfo rteaching Reading I ,Extensive Reading II ,Translaiton ,and Cros s g n it s e r e t n i n a n g i s e d o t s r e h c a e t e h t p l e h l li w y d u t s s i h T . g n i d n a t s r e d n U l a r u tl u C t m e h t p l e h d n a g n i h c a e t n i l a ir e t a m o en irch students ’vocabulaires .Thi sstudy h t e d i v o r p l li w et eacher swtihsomemateiralsf ort herit eaching . s m r e T f o n o it i n if e D . E n o it i n if e d e h t , y d u t s s i h t n i d e s u s m r e t e h t f o g n i d n a t s r e d n u s i m d i o v a o T . d e d i v o r p e b l li w s m r e t e h t f o
. 1 MatchMaker o t g n i d r o c c A Longman Dicitonary o fContemporary Engilsh ,the term e n o e m o s r o f r e n tr a p e l b a ti u s a d n if o t s e ir t o h w e n o e m o s s n a e m ) N ( r e k a m h c t a m . y r r a m o t e s l e Int hiss tudyt het ermmatchmake rmeanst het hrees ibilng swho rty . y r r a m o t s il l y h P r o f r e n tr a p e l b a ti u s a d n if o t . 2 MarryingMom m o T a )rry( V ti f, sel ha ssomemeaning sa sctiedi nLongman Dicitonaryo f h s il g n E y r a r o p m e t n o C .Theyare: . 1 . 2 Tobecomes omeone’ shusbando rwfie . 2 . 2 To ifndahusbando rwfief o roneo fyou rchlidren a d n if o t s n a e m m o M g n i y r r a m , y r a n o it c i d e h t n i d n u o f g n i n a e m e h t n o d e s a B e h t f o e n o r o f d n a b s u h a g n i d n if f o d a e t s n I . m o M ’ s g n il b i s e e r h t e h t r o f d n a b s u h e h t r o f d n a b s u h a d n if o t s n a e m g n i y r r a m , y d u t s s i h t n i , n e r d li h c chlidren’ sMom. . 3 MatchMaking n I thiss tudy ,matchmakinghast womeanings .Theyare: . 1 . 3 Thei deabehindo fbecomingamatchmakerf orthei rownMom. . 2 . 3 Theway sandt heurgencie so fbecomingamatchmake rf ro thei rownMom. . 4 Individuailsm u C f o y r a n o it c i D s ’ r e n r a e L d e c n a v d A d r o f x O rren tEngilsh state s tha t e e r f e h t s r u o v a f t a h t y r o e h t l a i c o s s i t i t s ri f ; s g n i n a e m o w t s a h ) N ( m s il a u d i v n i y r o e h t e h t h ti w d e t s a rt n o c ( s l a u d i v i d n i f o f e il e b f o y tr e b il e t e l p m o c d n a n o it c a d n o c e S . ) e t a t s e h t f o y c a m e r p u s e h t g n ir u o v a f , i ti sfeeilng o rbehaviou ro fa . m s i o g e ; t s ri f s t s e r e t n i e t a v ir p n w o s i h s t u p o h w n o s r e p
. 5 Privacy o t g n i d r o c c A Oxford Advanced Learner’ sDicitonaryo fCurren tEnglsih , . d e b r u t s i d n u d n a e n o l a , s r e h t o m o r f y a w a g n i e b f o e t a t s s n a e m y c a v ir p n i , e li h w n a e M Longman Dicitonaryo fContemporaryEngilsh ,p irvacy meanst he e t a t s e h t d n a ; e l p o e p r e h t o y b d r a e h r o n e e s t o n d n a , e n o l a e b o t e l b a g n i e b f o e t a t s . n o it n e tt a c il b u p m o r f e e r f g n i e b f o . 6 Frustrated n I Cambridge Advanced Learner’ s Dicitonary , frusrtated (ADJ ) ha s : e r a y e h T . s g n i n a e m l a r e v e s . 1 . 6 Feeilngannoyedorl es scon ifden tbecauseyoucanno tachievewha tyouwant . 2 . 6 (beforenoun )Descirbe sapersonwho ha sno tsucceededi naparitculart ype b o j f o . 3 . 6 (beforenoun )Af rusrtatedemoitoni st heonet ha tyouareno tablet oexpress . 4 . 6 (beforenoun )Unhappybecauseyouareno thavinga smuchs exa syouwant u o y e s u a c e b t n e d if n o c s s e l r o d e y o n n a g n il e e f s n a e m d e t a rt s u r f , y d u t s s i h t n I w e n o e m o s r o f n o it p ir c s e d a s a d n a t n a w u o y t a h w e v e i h c a t o n n a c ho ha sno t . b o j f o e p y t r a l u c it r a p a n i d e d e e c c u s
7 R E T P A H C I I D E T A L E R F O W E I V E R LITERATURE . e r u t a r e ti L d e t a l e R f o w e i v e R s i r e t p a h c d n o c e s e h T The discussion in . k r o w e m a r F l a c it e r o e h T d n a s e ir o e h T d e t a l e R f o w e i v e R h ti w s l a e d I I r e t p a h C f o y r o e h t , n o it a z ir e t c a r a h c d n a r e t c a r a h c f o y r o e h t s w e i v e r r e t p a h c s i h T approach , f o y r o e h t motivaiton ,andt heoryo fAmeircanvalues .TheTheoreitca lFramework e h t r e w s n a o t d e y o l p m e e r a s e ir o e h t e h t w o h n o s n o it a n a l p x e e m o s s r e v o c m e l b o r p formulaiton s e i r o e h T d e t a l e R f o w e i v e R . A n o it a z i r e t c a r a h C d n a r e t c a r a h C f o y r o e h T . 1 d n a t s r e d n u o T . e r u t a r e ti l f o k r o w a n i t n e m e l e t n a tr o p m i n a s i r e t c a r a h C n i s r e t c a r a h c e h t t u o b a e r o m Marrying Mom , tii snecessary t o r eviewt he t heory . y l p e e d n o it a z ir e t c a r a h c d n a r e t c a r a h c f o r e t c a r a h C f o y r o e h T 1 . 1 s i w e L d n a g r e b n e tl A (1963 )saytha,t“Sinceou rdeifniitono f ifcitonstate s f o s y a w l a e r a s r e t c a r a h c , s e c n e ir e p x e n a m u h s i n o it c if l l a f o r e tt a m t c e j b u s e h t t a h t d e n if e d e b y a m r e t c a r a h c A . t n e m e l e t n a tr o p m i t s o m e h t d n a t s e r e t n i h g i h a sa ” n o s r e p a f o n o it a t n e s e r p e r .( )p 2 . 4 r a s r e t c a r a h C e divided into two kinds ,namely “majo rcharacter” and “mino rcharacter” .According to Henkle (1997 )majo rcharacter sare the mos t e r a s r e t c a r a h c r o n i m e h t , e li h w n a e M . l e v o n a n i s r e t c a r a h c x e l p m o c d n a t n a tr o p m i
o c s s e l d n a t n a tr o p m i s s e l m r o f r e p o h w e s o h t mplex charactersi n anovel (p.87 -) 9 8 . n i r e t s o F Aspect soft heNoveldivide scharactersi nto “lfa tcharacters”and e h t m o r f e m a s e h t s y a t s o h w r e t c a r a h c a s i r e t c a r a h c t a lf A . ” s r e t c a r a h c d n u o r “ n a c r e t c a r a h c s i h t o s y r o t s e h t f o d n e e h t li t n u g n i n n i g e b beeasliyr ememberedby s i h t e s u a c e b d e z i n g o c e r y li s a e e b o s l a n a c r e t c a r a h c s i h t , s e d i s e B . s r e d a e r e h t a r o e s a r h p e l g n i s a n i d e b ir c s e d d n a s ti a rt o w t r o e n o y b d e z ir e t c a r a h c s i r e t c a r a h c n a t n e m a r e p m e t n i x e l p m o c s i fl e s ti r e t c a r a h c d n u o r e h T . e c n e t n e s d moitvaiton . s a d e r e b m e m e r y li s a e e b t o n n a c r e t c a r a h c s i h T Foster( 1974)s ays: “We remembe rhim i n conneciton with t he grea tscenes . tIi ndicates t ha t y n a m s a h d n a s e n a w d n a s e x a w e h r o f y li s a e o s m i h r e b m e m e r t o n o d e w y n a h ti w e b ir c s e d o t tl u c if fi d s a s i e h , e r o f e r e h T . s g n i e b n a m u h e k il s t e c a f e l b a p a c s i e h , e l p o e p t s o m e k il d n a , e fi l l a e r n i n o s r e p a s a y c a u q e d a o f s u g n i s ir p r u s .” ( .p )5 1 r e g r e b r h o R . y lt c e ri d n i r o y lt c e ri d r e h ti e d e t n e s e r p e b o s l a n a c r e t c a r a h c A ( s d o o W d n a 1971 )sayt hati ndriec tpresentaiton,t heautho rdriecltydescirbest he o s e t u b ir tt a l a r o m d n a l a u t c e ll e t n i , e c n a r a e p p a l a c i s y h p s ’ r e t c a r a h c rexplains t he y ti v it i s n e s s ’ r e t c a r a h c e h t f o e e r g e d ( p.2 0 .) e h t w o n k o t d e e n o s l a e w , k r o w y r a r e ti l a n i r e t c a r a h c e h t g n i z y l a n a n I r e t c a r a h c e h t f o s ti a rt e h t t a h t t u o d n if l li w e w , o s g n i o d y B . r e t c a r a h c e h t f o s ti a rt o e fi l l a e r e h t f o n o it c e lf e r a s i fhuman being .Beside ,s t hecharacter’ s rtati swli l s t h g u o h t s ’ e n o e c n e u lf n i o s l a ,s peech ,andbehaviou .r n o it a z i r e t c a r a h C f o y r o e h T 2 . 1 ( n a m r a H d n a n a m l o H 1986) ,statet ha tcharacteirzaiton i s“thecreaiton o f
” e k il e fi l s a r e d a e r e h t r o f t s i x e y e h t t a h t o s s n o s r e p y r a n i g a m i .( p 8 1 .)According ( o tr u B d n a , n a m r e B , t e n n a B o t 1988 ,) there are severa lway sauthor sin rtoduce h g u o r h t ,s r e t c a r a h c e h t f o n o it p ir c s e d t c e ri d e h t m o r f e d i s a s r e t c a r a h c r i e h t wha t t a h w d n a , m e h t t u o b a y a s s r e t c a r a h c r e h t o t a h w , o d y e h t t a h w , y a s s r e t c a r a h c e h t m e h t o t o d r e h t o .( )p 7 . 1 y h p r u M (1972 )states tha tthere are nine method sto desc irbe how an a e r e h t e k a m o t s ti a rt d n a s e it il a n o s r e p ’ s r e t c a r a h c e h t l a e v e r y a m r o h t u a der s s r e t c a r a h c r i e h t d n a t s r e d n u .( 1p 1 -6 173) .Thoseare: 1 . 2 . 1 Persona lDescirpiton ’ n o s r e p a f o n o it p ir c s e d a e v a h n a c s r e d a e r e h T scharacter sby , n o it p ir c s e d s i h t g n i v a H . s e h t o l c d n a e c n a r a e p p a r e h / s i h t a g n i k o o l s c it s ir e t c a r a h c l a c i s y h p s ’ r e t c a r a h c e h t e z il a u s i v n a c s r e d a e r e h t .r o l o c n i k s e h t d n a , t h g i e h e h t ,t h g i e w e h t s a h c u s 2 . 2 . 1 Characte rass eenbyt heothers e d r o h t u a e h T scirbe sacharacte rbyusingother’ sopinion . 3 . 2 . 1 Speech r e t c a r a h c e h t t a h w h g u o r h t r e t c a r a h c a d n a t s r e d n u n a c s r e d a e r e h T .s n o i n i p o g n i v i g n i d n a n o it a s r e v n o c r e h / s i h n i s y a s 4 . 2 . 1 Pas tLfie / s i h h g u o r h t y r o t s e h t n i r e t c a r a h c a s e b ir c s e d r o h t u a e h T he rpas t e h t e p a h s s r e d a e r e h t , e fi l t s a p s ’ r e t c a r a h c e h t g n i n r a e l y B . e fi l . y ti l a n o s r e p s ’ r e t c a r a h c 5 . 2 . 1 Conversaitono fOthers
e h t h g u o r h t r e t c a r a h c a f o n o it p ir c s e d a e v a h n a c s r e d a e r e h T e h / m i h t u o b a y a s y e h t s g n i h t d n a e l p o e p r e h t o f o n o it a s r e v n o c .r 6 . 2 . 1 Reaciton s r e d a e r e h t g n it t e l y b r e t c a r a h c a n o s n o it p ir c s e d s e v i g r o h t u a e h T e t c a r a h c e h t w o h d n a t s r e d n u r reactst ova irou svairaitonandeven.t 7 . 2 . 1 Driec tComment e h t t u o b a t n e m m o c r o n o it p e c r e p l a n o s r e p s ’ r o h t u a e h t s i s i h T e h t a h t r e t c a r a h c create .s 8 . 2 . 1 Thoughts y e h t f i r e t c a r a h c a f o n o it p ir c s e d e h t e v a h n a c s r e d a e r e h T .t h g u o h t s ’ r e t c a r a h c e h t n i e v l o v n i y l e v it c e j b u s 9 . 2 . 1 Manneirsm d n a m s ir e n n a m r e h / s i h h g u o r h t r e t c a r a h c a s e b ir c s e d r o h t u a e h T .s ti b a h o t e l b a e b l li w I y r o e h t s i h t g n i s U understand the charactersi n t henovel . f o s r e t c a r a h c e h t e b ir c s e d o t e l b a e b l li w I , r e h tr u F Marrying Mom by Oilvia h ti m s d l o G s e h c a o r p p A f o y r o e h T . 2 s d o o W d n a r e g r e b r h o R (1971) in thei rbook Reading and Wriitng abou t e r u t a r e ti L men itoned ifvet ype so fapproache swhichareused t oanalyzework o f s ti f o g n i d n a t s r e d n u n a s e t a ti s s e c e n e r u t a r e ti l o t h c a o r p p a l a c it ir c A . e r u t a r e ti l o t w o h , s i e r u t a r e ti l t a h w w o n k t s u m e n O . s e u l a v e v it i s o p d n a , n o it c n u f , e r u t a n d a e r ti ,and howt o j udge ti( p. .3) Thepurposeo fciritca lapproach i st o help t he
d a e r o t w o h g n i w o n k y b k r o w y r a r e ti l e h t f o g n i d n a t s r e d n u r a e l c a e v a h o t r e d a e r : e r a s e h c a o r p p a e h T . ti e g d u j o t d n a t i h c a o r p p A t s il a m r o F e h T . 1 . 2 e h t s i h c a o r p p a t s il a m r o f e h t f o s u c o f e h T totaltiyoft hel tieraryobject .On . k r o w y a r r e ti l e h t f o ” m r o f “ e h t n o s e s u c o f ti d r o w r e h t o e h t In addiiton ,theyare e h t o t s tr a p e h t ll a f o t n e m e v l o v n i s u o i n o m r a h e h t g n it a rt s n o m e d h ti w d e n r e c n o c ti w d n a e l o h w h poinitng ou thow meaning i sde irved from srtucture and how n h c e t f o s r e tt a m iquedetermines rtucture( p. 6- )7 . t u o h ti w e c e i p y r a r e ti l e h t s e n i m a x e c it ir c t s il a m r o f e m e rt x e e h t ,r e v o e r o M g e h t o t e c n e r e f e r t u o h ti w , e fi l s ’ r o h t u a e h t f o s t c a f o t e c n e r e f e r enreoft hepieceo r t u o h ti w d n a , y r o t s i h e r u t a r e ti l n i r o e r n e g e h t f o t n e m p o l e v e d e h t n i e c a l p s ti o t e c n e r e f e r to ti ssocia lmiileu( p. .7) Theexrtemef ormails tc iritcexaminesl tierary s d n a , l a c ir o t s i h , e r n e g , e fi l s ’ r o h t u a e h t g n i c it o n t u o h ti w s k r o w ocia lbackground. h c a o r p p A l a c i h p a r g o i B e h T . 2 . 2 d n a e fi l s ’ r o h t u a e h t n o s u c o f s ti s e v i g h c a o r p p a l a c i h p a r g o i b e h T n r a e l o t t p m e tt a y e h t , y lt n e u q e s n o C . s k r o w y r a r e ti l e h t g n i n i m a x e n i y ti l a n o s r e p h t u a e h t f o t n e m p o l e v e d d n a e fi l t u o b a n a c y e h t s a h c u m s a or sand t o apply t hi s o t t p m e tt a r i e h t n i e g d e l w o n k understand hi sw iritng (p. .8) In othe rwords ,the o r p p a l a c i h p a r g o i b ach relate sauthor’ sexpeirence in the rea llfie wtih his /he r .s k r o w y r a r e ti l l a r u tl u c o i c o S e h T . 3 . 2 -Historica lApproach l a r u tl u c o i c o s e h T -histo irca lapproach i sthe approach tha t Iwli luse in
g n i z y l a n a Marrying Mom .Thi sapproach examine sltierary work sbased on the referenceo fciviilzaitonwheret hework swereproduced .They deifneciviilzaiton o it c a d n a s e d u ti tt a e h t s a n so fa speci ifc group o fpeople and poin tou ttha t r e tt a m t c e j b u s s ti s a s n o it c a d n a s e d u ti tt a e s e h t s e k a t e r u t a r e ti l .(p9 .) Thi s y r a r e ti l e h t f o t n e t n o c e h t o t e c n e u lf n i s e v i g n o it a z il i v i c t a h t s e v e il e b h c a o r p p a .s k r o w h c a o r p p A c i e o p o h t y M e h T . 4 . 2 m e h T ythopoeicapproachi sused t odiscove rcetrainuniversally r ecurren t s k r o w t n a c if i n g i s n i n o i s s e r p x e d n if e v e il e b y e h t h c i h w t h g u o h t n a m u h f o s n r e tt a p t s ri f d n u o f t a h t e s o h t e r a , tr e s s a y e h t ,s n r e tt a p t n e r r u c e r y ll a s r e v i n u e s e h T . tr a f o e i c n a n i n o i s s e r p x e n tmyth sand f olkr tie sandaresobasict ohuman t houghtt ha t . n e m l l a r o f g n i n a e m e v a h y e h t Ph liilpWheelirghti nhi saritclePoerty ,Mythand n i d e ti c s a y ti l a e R Reading and Wriitng abou tLtierature by Rohrberge rand o i s s e r p x e e h t “ s a h t y m s e n if e d s d o o W n o facommuntiy mind which ha senjoyed d n a d e n r e tt a p s e m o c e b s s e n r e h t e g o t f o e s n e s e h t t a h t o s , h t w o r g l a r u t a n g n o l semanitcallys igniifcant”( p.1 1 .) h c a o r p p A l a c i g o l o h c y s P e h T . 5 . 2 p a c i e o p o h t y m e h t o t r a li m i s s i h c a o r p p a l a c i g o l o h c y s p e h T proach .The f o y d o b t n e r e f fi d a n o s w a r d h c a o r p p a l a c i g o l o h c y s p e h t t a h t s i e c n e r e f fi d e g d e l w o n k —mos to tfen on t ha toffered by Sigmund Freud and hi sfollower s(p. . ) 3 1 He beileves t hat t here i san unconsciou sarea i n human mind which i s irch it a n i g a m i h ti w on , capactiy o f creaiton and the complextiy o f though t and . r u o i v a h e b He also divide shuman personaltiy i nto t hree patr s– the i d, t he ego ,
. o g e r e p u s d n a Thi sapproach deal swtih mo itvaiton ,personaltiy, and confilc to f .r e t c a r a h c e h t r p p a e v if e r a e s o h T oache swhich arei ncludedi nt het heoryo fapproaches . . w e i v f o t n i o p d n a e u l a v n w o s ti s a h h c a o r p p a y r e v E Moreover ,each approach . s k r o w y r a r e ti l e h t g n i z y l a n a n i y a w t s e b n w o s ti s a h o s l a Nevetrheless , Ichose e h t psychological approach in analysing Marrying Mom by Oilvia Goldsmtih , e h t e c n i s psychologica lapproach deal swtih moitvaiton ,personaltiy ,and confilc t . r e t c a r a h c e h t f o The psychological approach i sapprop irate wtih thi s study y d u t s s i h t e s u a c e b deal swtih t hemoitvaiton oft hecharacter sand t hepersonaltiy s r e t c a r a h c n ii a m e h t f o o fMarryingMombyOilviaGoldsmtih. n o it a v it o M f o y r o e h T . 3 u R ch( 1967 )sayst ha thumanbehavio rcoverstwodfiferen tconcept swhich c n o c t s ri f e h T . d e t c e n n o c r e t n i e r a epti splacidtiyo rmodi ifablitiywhichi sf oundi n s i t p e c n o c d n o c e s e h T . s s e c o r p g n i n r a e l e h t energywhichcan beseent hrought he n o it a v it o m .( p 375) .Themo itvaiton tisel fcanbeexplainedbyusings omet heo ire s .s e h c a o r p p a r o 1 . 3 . TheMaslow’ sHierarchyo fNeeds w o l s a M a sctiedi n Psychologyand Lfie7thEdiiton ,descirbes ahierarchy o m e v if f o s t s i s n o c h c i h w s d e e n f o itve so rneeds .They are physiological needs , n o it a z il a u t c a f l e s d n a , s d e e n m e e t s e , s d e e n l a i c o s r o s s e n g n i g n o l e b , s d e e n y t e f a s . s d e e n Physiologicalneed saret hosewhichareneededt os uppo trl fie,f o rexample e h t f I .r e t a w d n a d o o f physiologicalneed saremet ,one’ sattenitont hen t urnsi nto . m r a h l a n o it o m e d n a t a e r h t l a c i s y h p m o r f e e r f e b o t r e d r o n i y ti r u c e s d n a y t e f a s
i s s e n g n i g n o l e B sthe fris tleve lo fhighe rleve lneed sand related to interaciton d l e h e b o t t n a w o t s d n e t e h , g n o l e b o t s d e e n s i h s ll if l u f n o s r e p a e c n O . s r e h t o h ti w s a d e z ir o g e t a c e b n a c s d e e n m e e t s E . s r e h t o e h t y b d n a f l e s m i h y b h t o b m e e t s e n i d n a s r o t a v it o m l a n r e t x e interna lmoitvators .Theexterna lesteem need saret hose e li h w n a e M . n o it i n g o c e r d n a n o it a t u p e r s a h c u s , the interna lesteem need sare fl e s s a h c u s e s o h t -esteem ,accomp ilshment and sel frespect .Sel factuailzaiton o l e v e l t s e h g i h e h t r o x a m il c e h t e r a s d e e n fMaslow’ smo itvaiton t heory .Unilke , w o l s a M o t g n i d r o c c A . d e if s it a s y ll u f r e v e n s i d e e n s i h t , s d e e n l e v e l r e w o l e h t . d e t a v it c a e r a s r e h t o e h t e r o f e b d e ll if l u f e b t s u m y e h T . y ti r o ir p e k a t s d e e n r e w o l e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t g n i z y l a n a n i e m p l e h l li w y r o e h t s i h T r s’mo itvaiton. Iwli l s n o it a v it o m n w o r i e h t t u o d n if o t e l b a e b in making sure tha tthei rmothe rget s . d e ir r a m ) d n a ll e l C c M ( y r o e h T s d e e N d e r i u q c A . 2 . 3 d n a ll e l C c M d i v a D o t g n i d r o c c A (http://wwwl.aynetwork .scom/Theo ires -f o -Moitvaiton.html accessed on May 24th ,2011 )some need sare acquried a sa e h t a s p o l e v e d e h d n a s e c n e ir e p x e e fi l f o t l u s e r ory on t hreet ype so fmoitvaiton .s d e e n . 1 . 2 . 3 Needf o rpower ,conrto lother .s . 2 . 2 . 3 Needf o raf ifilaiton,f ormclosepersonalr elaitonship .s . 3 . 2 . 3 Needf o rachievement ,accomplishs omethingdfififcutl e c n e u lf n i s d r a w o t d e n il c n i e r a r e w o p r o f d e e n h g i h r o f e l p o e p y ll a c i s a B r o s n o it i s o p y e k n e v i g e r a y e h t fi m r o fr e p o t d e t a v it o m e b n a c y e h T . l o rt n o c d n a r u t a n n i l a i c o s e r a o h w e l p o e p e h t e r a y r o g e t a c d n o c e s e h t n I . s n o it i s o p r e w o p e .
n i e l p o e P . n o it a v it o m m e h t s e d i v o r p s r e h t o h ti w n o it a il if f a d n a n o it i n g o c e r l a i c o S h c u S . e r u li a f f o r a e f e h t d n a s s e c c u s f o e g n e ll a h c e h t y b n e v ir d e r a a e r a d ri h t e h t t a e e s y e h t n e h w m r o f r e p o t d e t a v it o m e r a e l p o e p leasts omechance sofs ucces .s s i h T theorywli lalsohelpmei nanalyzingt hemaincharacters ’mo itvaiton . y r o e h t s i h T give s fu trhe r explanaiton abou t the kind s o f moitvaiton which . s a h y d o b y r e v e s e u l a V n a c i r e m A f o y r o e h T . 4 e n i v e L and Adelman in thei rbook Beyond Language ,Cross-Cutlura l n o it a c i n u m m o C ,say tha tmany Ameircans ,atlhough cetrainly no ta tal lhold .s e u l a v e s e h t t c e lf e r s n o it c a d n a r o i v a h e b r i e h t ; s e u l a v r a il i m s Theyalso statetha t l a r u tl u c f o t l u s e r t c e ri d a e r a g n it a c i n u m m o c d n a , g n it c a , g n i k n i h t f o s y a w n i a tr e c a n e v e ( s n a c ir e m A y n a m e b ir c s e d y li s a e n a c s e u l a v f o t s il g n i w o ll o f e h T . s e u l a v .) s n a c ir e m A f o y ti r o j a m . 1 . 4 Persona lconrto lovert heenvrionment e h t r e tl a n a c e l p o e P i rnature ,and to a large extent ,they can determine the e fi l ri e h t f o n o it c e ri d . . 2 . 4 Change a n g a t s e l p o e P . y h tl a e h s i e g n a h C te fit heydono tmakeenoughchange .s . 3 . 4 Con rto lovert he itme. y b d e n i a rt s n o c d n a d e r u s s e r p e r a e l p o e P itme because they are rtying to .t i l o rt n o c . 4 . 4 Equaltiyandegaltiairani ms .l a u q e d e t a e r c e r a e l p o e p l l a t a h t s y a s e u l a v s i h T TheAmeircant endencyi st o
. m e h t e z i s a h p m e o t n a h t r e h t a r s e c n e r e f fi d s u t a t s e z i m i n i m . 45.I ndividuailsmandpirvacy s n a c ir e m A need and value p irvacy .P irvacy, t o an Ameircan doe sno tmean . s s e n il e n o l r o n o it a l o s i American people beileve tha tindividua lneed sare . y r a m ir p d e r e d i s n o c P irvacy exist sbecause individual sfee ltha tthei rneed s . d e t c e p s e r e b t s u m . 46 .Sefl- ph el n a c e l p o e P andshould rtyt oi mprovet hei rownl fie .Manymiddleandupper r i e h t y b p u s e v l e s m e h t ll u p “ n a c e l p o e p t a h t f e il e b e h t e v a h s n a c ir e m A s s a l c . ” s p a rt s t o o b n w o . 47 .Futureo irentaiton .t s a p e h t o t t o n d n a e r u t u f e h t o t k o o l s y a w l a e l p o e p n a c ir e m A Tradiitonand r a p l l a m s a y a l p , t s a p e h t f o s r e d n i m e r ,l a u ti r t i n mos tAmeircan’ sdaliy l fie . s n a c ir e m A y n a m t a h t s l a o g , e g n a h c d n a s s e r g o r p n o s u c o f a d a e t s n i s i e r e h T . e v e i h c a o t y rt Thisi salsor elatedt ot heAmeircan’ sbeilefi npersona lconrto l i v n e s ’ e n o r e v o ronmen t(and one’ slfie) ,and the emphasi son “doing” and . g n it c a . 48 .Acitonandworko irentaiton s e n if e d n e tf o k r o W people;t herii denitite scomef romwhatt heydo. . 49.I nformaltiy i p y t e r a l a u ti r l a m r o f f o k c a l e h t d n a , s e h t o l c l a u s a c , e g a s u e m a n t s ri F cal i n . e fi l n a c ir e m A
y t s e n o h d n a , s s e n n e p o , s s e n t c e ri D . 0 1 . 4 t o n s i tI . y l n e p o s e v l e s m e h t s s e r p x e d l u o h s e l p o e P . y c il o p t s e b e h t s i y t s e n o H . ” h s u b e h t d n u o r a t a e b “ o t d o o g d e r e d i s n o c . 411 .Mate irailsm h ti w n a h t l a ir e t a m h ti w d e n r e c n o c e r o m e b o t y c n e d n e T spritiua l o r .s l a o g l a u t c e ll e t n i a y l p e e d s n i a l p x e y r o e h t s i h T bou tAmeircanvalue swhicht heybeileveand . e fi l y li a d r i e h t n i y l p p a Thist heorywli lgivemeaclea rpictureo fhowSigourney , e s i c r e x e e c u r B d n a , n o r a h S Ame ircan value sin Oilvia Goldsmtih’ sMarrying m o M . k r o w e m a r F l a c it e r o e h T . B o t y rt I , y d u t s s i h t n I if ndou thowSigourney ,Bruce ,andSharon ,themain r i e h t r o f r e k a m h c t a m e h t e m o c e b o t d e d i c e d s ’ h ti m s d l o G a i v il O f o s r e t c a r a h c s ’ h ti m s d l o G a i v il O n i n e e s s a r e h t o m MarryingMom. Here,t heoryo fapproaches , c f o y r o e h t haracte rand characte irzaiton ,theory o fmoitvaiton ,and theory o f s e u l a v n a c ir e m A areused. n o it p ir c s e d r a e l c e v i g o t n o it a z ir e t c a r a h c d n a r e t c a r a h c f o y r o e h t e h t e s u I w o h f o Sigourney ,Sharon ,Bruce ,and also Phylils are depicted in the novel . , s e d i s e B Iapply the psychologica lapproach a sthe bes tapproach to see the .r e t c a r a h c e h t f o t c il f n o c d n a y ti l a n o s r e p , n o it a v it o m Fu trhe r Iuse theory o f e h t t a h t e r u s g n i k a m n i n o it a v it o m ’ s r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t t u o d n if o t n o it a v it o m i r s a d e ir r a m s t e g r e h t o m seen in Sigourney ,Bruce ,and Sharon. By knowing the
s e u l a v n a c ir e m A e h t y l p p a n a c I , e v a h s ’ s r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t h c i h w s n o it a v it o m e c u r B , y e n r u o g i S w o h t u o d n if o t y r o e h t ,andSharonexerciseAmeircanvalues in l e v o n e h t Marrying M om by Oilvia Goldsmtih and the last , Ican ifnd ou thow , e c u r B , y e n r u o g i S and Sharon ,themain character so fOilviaGoldsmtih, decided n i n e e s s a r e h t o m r i e h t r o f r e k a m h c t a m e h t e m o c e b o t MarryingMom. l e v o N e h t f o t x e t n o C . C h ti m s d l o G a i v il O wa sborni nNewJ ersey .Shet ookupw iritngf ollowinga . d a h e h s g n i h t y r e v e t o g d n a b s u h r e h d i a s e h s h c i h w n i e c r o v i d Manyo fhe rbook s a e v a h constan ttheme ,whichist hemisrteatmen to fwomenbyt hement heyl ove , t u o g n i m o c n e m o w e h t h ti w t u b a sthewinnersi nt heend. w e h s 6 9 9 1 n I roteanove litltedMarryingMom .Thes etitngoft henoveli s k r o Y w e N n i , in 1996. Therewa sahard itmei nNewYorkatt ha t itme .People’ s h g i h g n it t e g e r e w s e c ir p e li h w n a e m , n w o d g n i w o l s e r e w s s e n i s u b er . Thi s n o it i d n o c gavei n lfuencet o t henovel ,sincet hemain character salso expe irenced s e n i s u b r i e h t h c i h w n i n o it i d n o c e h t s se ares lowingdownandi twa shardf ort hem . n o it i d n o c l a i c n a n if d e lt t e s a e v a h o t s i h T noveltell saboutt hreesibilng swhich rty t o becomet hematch maker . m o M r i e h t r o f The t hree sibilng s ilve i n New York ,whlie t hei rmother ,Phylil s e v o m o t d e d i c e d s il l y h P , y a d e n O . a d ir o l F n i e v il o t d e s u toNewYorksot ha tshe d n a n e r d li h c r e h h c t a w n a c ge tcloser tot hem .Later ,tit urn soutt ha the rchlidren l t o n o d ike he rdecision to move into New York .They think tha tshe wli lruin
e h t , y ll a n if o S . e fi l ri e h t y decided t o become amatch make rfo rPhylil sand ifnd t o n l li w e h s t a h t o s ,f o e r a c e k a t o t d n a b s u h a r e h interfereint hei rilves.
0 2
I
I
I
R
E
T
P
A
H
C
Y
G
O
L
O
D
O
H
T
E
M
. y g o l o d o h t e M s i r e t p a h c d ri h t e h T Thi schapte rdiscusses Objec to fthe Study ,Approach oft heStudy and Method oft heStudy .TheObjectoft heStudy l e v o n e h t h ti w s l a e d Marrying Mom by Oilvia Goldsmtih ,which is t hefocu so f e h T . y d u t s e h t Approach o ft he Study discusses t heciritca lapproach appiled fo r y lt s a L . l e v o n s i h t g n i z y l a n a , t he Method of t heStudy outilnes t he procedure so f . d e z y l a n a s i y d u t s e h t w o h . A Objec toft heStudy l e v o n e h t s i y d u t s s i h t f o t c e j b o e h T Marrying Mom. Thi snove lwa s , s r e h s il b u P s n il l o C r e p r a H y b d e h s il b u p d n a 6 9 9 1 n i s h ti m s d l o G a i v il O y b n e tt ir w . c n I Thenove lcontain s22chapter sand207-pagel ong. e e r h t s a h o h w w o d i w a , s u o m o n o r e G s il l y h P f o y r o t s e h t s ll e t l e v o n s i h T e c u r B , y e n r u o g i S ; n e r d li h c ,and Sharon .Theset hreechlidren ilve i n New York , e li h w Phylil s ilves in Flo irda .A sPhylil ssta trsf eeilngl onely and need shert hree . n e r d li h c e e r h t r e h h ti w e v il d n a , k r o Y w e N o t e v o m o t s e d i c e d e h s , n e r d li h c b n e r d li h c r e h s r e h t o b n o i s i c e d r e h , y lt n e r a p p A ecauset heydono twantt hei rMom e r e f r e t n i o t in thei rlfie. To solve thi sproblem ,Sigourney ,Bruce ,and Sharon t e g o t e d i c e d thei rmothe rremarired so t hat t hei rMom wli lnoti nterferein thei r e fi l and they do no thave to take care of t hei rMom because someone else wli l r e h f o e r a c e k a t .m o M g n i y r r a M i s irch wtih cutlura lvalues .Moreover ,the nove lalso o p rrtayed one o fthe Ameircan lfie syles ,which i sunusua lfo rEastern people e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t y b d e s i c r e x e e r a h c i h w s e u l a v n a c ir e m A s ti h ti w g n o l a r .s . B Approachoft heStudy e h t d n a l e v o n e h t n i s r e t c a r a h c e h t s i y d u t s e h t f o s u c o f e h T Ameircan e c u r B , y e n r u o g i S y b d e s i c r e x e e r a h c i h w s e u l a v ,and Sharon .In analysing the s m e l b o r p I needed an approach which could help . In doing so , I use the c y s p hologica lapproach . The psychologica lapproach help sto see the moitvaiton ,personaltiy and .r e t c a r a h c e h t f o t c il f n o c However , human moitvaiton i s a par t o f human n i a tr e c g n i y lr e d n u n o it a v it o m t u o b a e r o m n i a l p x e n a c h c i h w y g o l o h c y s p e h t r e w s n a o t d e il p p a s i h c a o r p p a l a c i g o l o h c y s p e h t , e r o f e r e h T . s r o i v a h e b . y d u t s s i h t n i d e t a l u m r o f s m e l b o r p . C Methodoft heStudy h T . y d u t s y r a r b il a s i y d u t s s i h T erearet wokind so fsourcest ha tareused , l e v o n e h t s i e c r u o s y r a m ir p e h T . s e c r u o s y r a d n o c e s d n a y r a m ir p y l e m a n Marrying m o M (1996) ,by Oilvia Goldsmtihs .The secondary source sare book srelated t o s m r e t y r a r e ti l e h t f o y r o e h t e h t ,t heoryo fmoitvaiton ,andalsot heoryo fAmeircan s e u l a v .Thosearecollectedt os uppo trt heanalysis . g n i d a e r s a w p e t s t s ri f e h T . y d u t s e h t g n i z y l a n a n i n e k a t e r e w s p e t s l a r e v e S the nove lMarrying Mom by Oilvia Goldsmtihscomprehensively .A tfe rreading
d n a l e v o n e h t f o a e d i n i a m e h t t u o d n if o t e l b a s a w I , s e m it l a r e v e s r o f l e v o n e h t e h T . y d u t s e h t n i d e z y l a n a e b d l u o c t a h t s t n i o p e h t point stha t Iwould analyze e r e w theproblemf ormulaitonandsummairzedi nt he itlteoft hiss tudy. a i v il O r o h t u a e h t t u o b a n o it a m r o f n i g n ir e h t a g s a w p e t s d ri h t e h T l e v o n e h t , s h ti m s d l o G Marrying Mom, theory o fcharacte rand characteirzaiton , f o y r o e h t ,s e h c a o r p p a f o y r o e h t moitvaiton ,and t heory o fAmeircan values .The c n e d n a , t e n r e t n i , s k o o b yclopedia provided me wtih enough informaiton and s i h T . s e c n e r e f e r informaitonandr eference sweret hes econdaryr esource .s o t s i s y l a n a e h t g n it c u d n o c s a w p e t s t x e n e h T ifnd ou thow Sigourney , e d s ’ h ti m s d l o G a i v il O f o s r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t , e c u r B d n a , n o r a h S cided t obecome s ’ h ti m s d l o G a i v il O n i n e e s s a r e h t o m r i e h t r o f r e k a m h c t a m e h t MarryingMom by h c a o r p p a l a c i g o l o h c y s p e h t .The if tfhstepwasr eporitng t he ifnding sand making S . c i p o t e m a s e h t n o h c r a e s e r r e h tr u f r o f n o it a d n e m m o c e r uggesiton fo rapplying thiss tudyt ot eachEngilshi sgiven.
