Ita Megawaty Sihombing
IV. RESEARCH FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION 4.1 Findings
Research findings were the conclusion of the research result with data shown. After the researcher treated the data and verified the hypothesis, then the researcher came to the research finding. It was important as adequate exposition of the purpose of the study being reported and the chapter topic involved. The researcher found that:
1. The effect of Jigsaw technique to the students‘ ability in comprehending narrative text at the grade X students of SMA Swasta Dharma Bhakti Siborongborong Kabupaten Tapanuli, the students were able tocomprehend the text.
2. The use of Jigsaw technique had an effect in comprehending narrative text at the grade X students of SMA Swasta Dharma Bhakti Siborongborong Kabupaten Tapanuli. The result of analyzing data, the score of t-test was higher than t- table(5.26>1.66). It means there was a significant effect of using Jigsaw technique
Prosiding Seminar Ilmiah Terjadwal ―Pengolahan Data Analisis Karya Ilmiah”, 08 Mei 2018
Page 95 in comprehending narrative text at the grade X students of SMA Swasta Dharma Bhakti Siborongborong Kabupaten Tapanuli.
3. The researcher found that by technique teaching English by using Jigsaw technique, the students begin to interest in English. It can be seen that language learning is hard task that can make frustrating but by Jigsaw technique the students can express their idea freely, and using their background knowledge in study English.
4. Jigsaw technique are well behaved in classroom activities, which the students are motivated to learn, because this technique invites the students to user brainstorming when reading. The researcher found that the all the students in experimental group are active in teaching learning process. While in control group just the smartest students in that class who are active.
4.2 Discussion
The purpose of this research was to find out whether teaching by using Jigsaw technique was more significant than without using Jigsaw technique to the students‘ ability in comprehending narrative text.
From the result that the researcher got after doing the research it could be concluded that Jigsaw technique was suitable as the teaching technique for the students especially in teaching reading comprehension in narrative text. It could be seen from the score that the students got in experimental group was higher than the students in control group. This technique was suitable to increase students‘ comprehending in comprehend the text well.
In experimental group using Jigsaw technique, the students were more active and they can share their feeling, idea, and arguments when completed their task that had given by the researcher. By using Jigsaw technique, every student had the chance to give their idea and if there were the students did not understand about the lesson the other students in that group must helped them.
During the activity, the students needed to discuss certain on topics in a group.
Each student should share their ideas when doing the work in group. However, when they already use their opportunity to speak, they needed to be patient and turned to listen the others member‘ ideas. It indicated that by applying jigsaw technique, the students‘ reading comprehension had improved and the problem of students in reading comprehension had been solved.
V. CONCLUSIONS
Based on the data analysis, the researcher makes the conclusions as follows : 1. Jigsaw technique taught to the grade X students of SMA Swasta Dharma Bhakti
Siborongborong Kabupaten Tapanuli has significant effect to the students ability in comprehending narrative text. It could be seen by the score of the students who taught by using jigsaw technique was higher than without using jigsaw technique.
Prosiding Seminar Ilmiah Terjadwal ―Pengolahan Data Analisis Karya Ilmiah”, 08 Mei 2018
Page 96 2. The students who were taught by using jigsaw technique are more active, because they study actively to read a narrative to solve their problem. They struggled to comprehend the material.
3. The result of t-test has proved the significant means of experimental group and control group. The result of t-test =5.26 while t-table = 1.66 at df = 70 (Nx +Ny – 2 )and at the level of significant α = 0.05, it is concluded that using jigsaw technique affect significantly to the students‘ ability in comprehending narrative text.
4. To make the students enjoy learning English, the teacher should find out the suitable technique to teach the students, so that the students could increase their ability in English Lesson. To increase the student ability in comprehending narrative text, the teacher used jigsaw technique because was a suitable technique that can be used to help the student are successful in their learning process.
REFERENCES
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2010. Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktek.
Yogyakarta: Rineka Cipta
Brassel, H. Douglas. 2008. Taking students beyond ordinary understanding to deep comprehension. Huntington Beach, CA 92649
Brown, H. Douglas. 2001. Teaching by principles: An interactive Approach to Language pedagogy. Second edition. New York: Longman.
Cohen, et. Al. 2007. Research Methods in Education. USA and Canada: Taylor and Francis e-Library.
Cresswell, John. W. 2009. Research Design-Qualitative, Qualitative and mixed methods approaches. USA: Sage Publicatio.
Harmer, Jeremy . 2007. The practice of language teaching. New York: Inc
Humaera, Isna. 2014. Taxonomy of language teaching techniques in teaching reading.
Tarbiyar department state islamaic college of sultan Qaimuddin Kendari Jacob, D, Ary & Sorensen. 2010. Introduction to research in education, 8th Edition. USA:
Wadsworth Cengange Learning.
Kagan,S 2009. Cooperative Learning. San clement: Kagan Publishing
Nunan, D. 2005. Practical English Language Teaching: Young Learners. New York: Mc Graw-Hill.
Nation, I. S. P. 2009. Teaching ESL/EFL Reading and Writing. University in Wellington, New Zealand.
Patel and Jain, 2008. English Language Teaching. Jaipur: Sunrise Publisher and Distributor.
Pang, Elizabeth.S. 1986. International Academy of Education-IAE.
Snow, Chaterine. 2002. Reading for understanding.RAND
Slavin, 1982, Cooperative Learning: Students Team. What Research say to the Teacher.
Washingtom, D.C: National Education Association
Westwood, Peter. 2001. Reading and Learning Diffulties. Australian Council for Educational Research Ltd 19 Prospect Hill Road, Camberwell, Victoria, 3124
Prosiding Seminar Ilmiah Terjadwal ―Pengolahan Data Analisis Karya Ilmiah”, 08 Mei 2018
Page 97