BAB V KESIMPULAN DAN SARAN
5.2. Saran
1. Untuk mendapatkan informasi lebih lanjut, dapat melakukan uji unsur-unsur hara yang lain, seperti P dan K.
2. Tanaman jagung diuji pada musim lain.
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Ahn. H. K., T. J.Sauer., T. L. Richard. and T. D. Glanville. 2009. Determination of Thermal Properties of Composting Bulking Materials. Bioresourece Technology 100 (2009): 3974-3981.
Afandi, R. 2002. Ilmu Kesuburan Tanah. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisius.
Anderson A. N., D. C. McKenzie, and J. J. Friend. 1998. SOILpak for Dryland Farmers on The Red Soil of Central Western NSW. NSW Agriculture.
Brady, M. 1990. The Nature and Properties of Soils.10th ed. Macmillan Publ.
Company. New York.
Brady, N. C. and R. R. Weil, 2002.The Nature and Properties of Soils.31th ed.
Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New York.511 p.
Bremer, E. and K. Ellert. 2004. Soil Quality Indicators: A Review with Implications for Agricultural Ecosystems in Alberta. Symbio Ag Consulting Lethbridge.
Buckman, H. O. and C. Brady. 1961. The Nature and Properties of Soils. The McMillan, Co. New York.
Budiyanto, Agus. K. 2008. Hand Out-3. Nutrisi Mikroorganisme. Umm Press.
Malang.
Buttler, T. A., L. J. Sikora, P. M. Steinhilber, and L. W. Douglas. 2001. Compost Age and Sample Storage Effects on Maturity Indicators of Biosolids Compost.
Journal of Environment Quality 30:2141-2148.
Cahyani, V. R. 1996. Pengaruh Inokulasi Mikorisa Vesikular-Arbuskular dan Perimbangan Takaran Kapur dengan Bahan Organik terhadap Pertumbuhan Tanaman Jagung pada Tanah Ultisol Kentrong.Tesis. Pasca Sarjana UGM.
Yogyakarta.
Convertini G., D. Ferri, F. Montemurro and M. Maiorana. 2004. Effects of Municipal Solid Waste Compost on Soils Cropped with Tomato and Sunflower in Rotation with Durum Wheat. Istituto Sperimentale Agronomico, Bari, Italy.
Darman, S. 2006. Efisiensi Serapan Fosfat dan Pengaruh Komponen Beberapa Sifat Kimia Tanah Terhadap Hasil Tanaman Kedelai Akibat Pemberian Ekstrak Kompos Dan Pupuk Fosfat Pada Oxic Dystrudepts. J. Agrisains 7 (2): 86-93.
Djakakirana, G. dan S. Sabiham. 2007. Pengembangan Pertanian Spesifik Lokasi:
Jawaban dalam Mendukung Budidaya Pertanian Ekologis. Yayasan Padi Indonesia, Jakarta.
Dongoran, D. 2009. Respon Pertumbuhan dan Produksi Tanaman Jagung (Zea mays Saccharata Sturt) terhadap Pemberian Pupuk Cair TNF dan Pupuk Kandang Ayam.Skripsi. Universitas Sumatera Utara: Medan.
Edmond, J. B., A. M. Musser, and F. S. Andrews. 1957. Fundamentals of Horticulture. McGraw Hill Book Co. Inc. New York. 456 p.
Evanylo, G. K. 1988. Nitrogen Soil Testing for Corn in Virginia.Virginia Cooperative Extension.Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.http://www.ext.vt.edu
Fatimah, S. dan B. M. Handarto. 2008. Pengaruh Komposisi Media Tanam terhadap Pertumbuhan dan Hasil Tanaman Sambiloto (Andrographis Paniculata, Nees).
Embryo Vol. 5 No. 2.Jurusan Agroekoteknologi Fak. Pertanian Unijoyo.
Foth, H. D. 1988. Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Tanah. Endang, D. P., Dwi, R. L., Rahayuning, T. Penerjemah; Sri, A. B. H., ed. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.
Terjemahan dari: Fundamental of Soil Science.
Gardner et al. 1991. Fisiologi Tanaman Budidaya. Herawati Susilo, penerjemah.
Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press. Terjemahan dari Physiology of Crop Plants.
Goh, K. M. and Haynes, R. J. 1986.Nitrogen and Agronomic Practice. In: Mineral Nitrogen in The Plant-Soil System (Ed. R. J. Haynes), p. 379-442. Academic Press. London.
Gregory, A. S., and A. W. Vickers. 2006. Effects of amendments on soil structural development in a clay soil-forming material used as a cap for landfill restoration. Volume 19, Issue 3, pages 273–276, September 2003.
Grunes, D. L., and W. H. Allaway. 1985. Nutritional Quality of Plants in Relation to Fertilizer Use. In: Fertilizer Technology and Use, O. P. Engelstad et al. (eds.).
pp. 589-619. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin.
Hadisuwito, S. 2007. Membuat Pupuk Kompos Cair. Agromedia Pustaka. Jakarta.
Harada, Y. K., Tosada and M. Koshino 1993.Quality of compost produced from animal waste. Japan Agriculture Research Quartely. 26: 238-246.
Harahap, H. 2007. Pola Pertumbuhan dan Produksi Jagung (Zea mays L.) pada Musim Kering terhadap Perbedaan Waktu Tanam.Skripsi. Universitas Sumatera Utara. Medan.
Hardjowigeno, S. 2007. Ilmu Tanah. Akademika Pressindo. Jakarta.
Haug, R. T. 1980. Compost Engineering Principles and Practices. Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Inc. Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Indriani, Y. H, 2002. Membuat Kompos Secara Kilat. PT Penebar Swadaya.
Islam, M. Z., D. I. Sharif and M. A. Hossain. 2008. A Comparative Study of Azotobacter spp. From Different Soil Samples. J.Soil.Nature 2(3):16-19.
Isnaini, M. 2006. Pertanian Organik. Cetakan Pertama. Penerbit Kreasi. Yogyakarta.
Isrun. 2006. Pengaruh Dosis Pupuk P dan Jenis Pupuk Kandang terhadap Beberapa Sifat Kimia Tanah, Serapan P dan Hasil Jagung (Zea mays var. saccharata sturt) Pada Inceptisols Jatinangor. J. Agrisains Vol, 7 No.1: 9-17.
Jacob, A. and H. V. Uexkull. 1960. Fertilizer Use: Nutrition and Manuring of Tropical Crops. Translated by C. L. Whittles. Hannover.593 p.
Judoamidjojo, R. M., A. A.Darwis, dan E. G. Sa’id. 1992. Teknologi Fermentasi.
Bogor: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, Pusat Antar Universitas Bioteknologi Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Karama, A. S., A. R. Marzuki, dan I. Manwan. 1990. Penggunaan Pupuk Organik pada Tanaman Pangan.Prosiding Lokakarya Nasional Efisiensi Pupuk V.
Cisarua 12-13 November 1990.
Krishnawati, D. 2003. Pengaruh Pemberian Pupuk Kascing terhadap Pertumbuhan Vegetatif Tanaman Kentang (Solanum Tuberosum).KAPPA. 4(1): 9-12.
Kononova, M. M. 1966. Soil Organic Matter: Its Roll in Soil Formation and in Soil Fertility. Perganon Press. London. England.
Lakitan, B. 1996.Fisiologi Pertumbuhan dan Perkembangan Tanaman. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta. 218 hal.
Lee, C. 2007. Corn Growth and Development.www.uky.edu/ag/grain crops
Leiwakabessy, F. M. 1988. Kesuburan Tanah. Jurusan Tanah. Fakultas Pertanian.
IPB. Bogor.
Lingga, P, Marsono. 2001. Petunjuk Penggunaan Pupuk. Penebar Swadaya. Jakarta.
Manan, M. H. A. 2006.Kamus Kimia. PT Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.
McWilliams, D. A., D. R. Berglund, and G. J. Endres. 1999. Corn Growth and Management Quick Guide.www.ag.ndsu.edu.
Mengel, K. and E. A. Kirkby. 1982. Principles of Plant Nutrition 3rd edition International Potash Institute. Warblaufen-Bern Switzerland.
Mulyani, M. Ir. 1999. Pupuk dan Cara Pemupukan. Cetakan Keenam. Penerbit Rineka Cipta. Jakarta.
Murbandono ,H. S. L. 2002. Membuat Kompos.Penerbit Penebar Swadaya. Jakarta.
Nelson, D. W., and L. E. Sommers. 1982. Total carbon, Organic Carbon, and Organic Matter. p. 539-577. In A.L. Page et al. (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis.Part 2.2nd ed. Agron.Mongr. 9. ASA and SSSA. Madison, WI.
Nuryani, S. H. U. dan Sutanto, R. 2002.Pengaruh Sampah Kota terhadap Hasil dan Tahana Hara Lombok. Jurnal Ilmu Tanah dan Lingkungan, 3 (1): 24-28.
Parman.2007. Pengaruh Pemberian Pupuk Organik Cair terhadap Pertumbuhan dan Produksi Kentang (Solanum tuberosum L.)Laboratorium Biologi Struktur dan Fungsi Tumbuhan Jurusan Biologi FMIPA UNDIP. Semarang.
Purwoko, T. 2007. Fisiologi Mikroba. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.
Puslittanak. 2005. Teknologi Pengolahan Lahan Kering: Menuju Pertanian Produktif dan Ramah Lingkungan. Pusat Penelitian Tanah Dan Agroklimat.
Bogor.
Prawiranata, S. Haran dan P. Tjondronegoro. 1992. Dasar – Dasar Fisiologi Tumbuhan. Jurusan Biologi. Fakultas Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam. IPB. Bogor.
Rahmawati, N. 2005.Pemanfaatan Biofertilizer pada Pertanian Organik. Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan.
Ratih, Dra. Dkk. 1999.Sains Kimia 2B. Bumi aksara, Jakarta.
Rao, N. S., Subba. 1994. Soil Microorganisms and Plant Growth. Oxford and IBM Publishing Co. London.
Rukmana, H., 1997. Usaha Tani Jagung. Kanisius.Yogyakarta.
Scott, H. D., L. S. Wood, and W. M. Miley. 1986. Long-term Effects of Tillage on The Retention and Ttransport of Soil Water. Arkansas Water Resources Research Center.Publication Number 125.39 p.
Setyorini, D. 2005. Pupuk Organik Tingkatkan Produksi Tanaman. Warta Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian.
Simamora, S. Ir. dan Salurdih, Ir. 2008.Meningkatkan Kualitas Kompos. PT Agro Media. Jakarta.
Simanungkalit, R. D. M., D. A. Suryadikarta, R. Saraswati, D. Setyorini, dan W.
Hartatik.2006. Pupuk Organik dan Pupuk Hayati. Balai Besar Litbang Sumberdaya Lahan Pertanian. Bogor.
Sisworo, W. H. 2006. Swasembada Pangan dan Pertanian Berkelanjutan Tantangan Abad Dua Satu: Pendekatan Ilmu Tanah, Tanaman dan Pemanfaatan Iptek Nuklir. Badan Tenaga Nuklir Nasional. Jakarta.
SNI 01-3555-1998. Metode Oven Penentuan Kadar Air.Badan Standardisasi Nasional. Jakarta.
SNI 02-4958-1999. Metode Kjeldahl. Badan Standardisasi Nasional. Jakarta.
Steenis, C. G. G. J. 1992. Flora. Cetakan keenam.Pradnya paramita. Jakarta.
Stevenson, F. T. 1982. Humus Chemistry.John Wiley and Sons. New York.
Stevenson, F. J. 1994. Humus Chemistry: Genesis, Composition and Reaction. John Willey and Sons. New York. 597 p.
Sugito, Y. Nuraini. dan Nihayati. 1995. Sistem Pertanian Organik. Fakultas Pertanian. Universitas Brawijaya. Malang.
Suntoro. 2001. Pengaruh Residu Penggunaan Bahan Organik, Dolomit dan KCl pada Tanaman Kacang Tanah (Arachis Hypogeae. L.) pada Oxic Dystrudept di Jumapolo. Karanganyar.Habitat, 12(3) 170-177.
Suprapto, H. S. 2001. Bertanam Jagung. Cetakan ke-21. Penebar Swadaya. Jakarta.
Sutanto, R. 2006. Pertanian Organik. Kanisius.Yogyakarta.
Sutedjo, M. M. 2002. Pupuk dan Cara Pemupukan. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta.
Sutoro, Y. Sulaeman, dan Iskandar. 1988. Budidaya Tanaman Jagung. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Tanaman Pangan. Bogor
Soepardi, G. 1983. Sifat dan Ciri Tanah. Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor.
Syekhfani. 1995. Hara Tanah, Air, dan Tanaman. Jurusan Tanah Fakultas Pertanian.
Universitas Brawijaya. Malang.
Tisdale, S. L., W. L. Nelson and J. P. Beaton, 1985. Soil Fertility and Fertilizer.4th Ed. Mac Millian Publ. Co. Inc. New York. 695 p
Valarini, P. J., G. Curaque, A. Seguel, K. Manzano, R. Rubio, P. Cornejo, and F.
Borie. 2009. Effect of Compost Application on Some Properties of A Volcanic Soil From Central South Chile. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 69(3):416-425
Wahyudi, I. 2009. Manfaat Bahan Organik terhadap Peningkatan Ketersediaan Fosfor dan Penurunan Toksisitas Alumunium di Ultisol.Disertasi Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Brawijaya. Malang.
Wu, L., and L. Q. Ma. 2001. Effect of Sample Storage on Biosolids Compost Stability and Maturity Evaluation, Waste Management, Technical Report. Journal of Environmental Quality 30:222-228.
Yang, S. S. 1997.Preparation of Compost and Evaluating Its Maturity. Agriculture and Holticulture Extension Bulletin No. 445.
Yulianti, F, 2007, Stabilisasi Tanah Lempung Purwodadi Dengan Menggunakan Abu Batubara Dan Kapur Ditinjau Dari Nilai Cbr Dan Swelling. Skripsi. Jurusan Teknik Sipil UNNES. Semarang.
Zebarth, B. J., J. H. Neilsen, E. Hogue, and D. Neilsen. 1999. Influence Of Organic Waste Amendment on Selected Soil Physical and Chemical Properties. Can. J.
Soil Sci. 79:501-504.
LAMPIRAN
Lampiran 1.Standar Kualitas Pupuk Organik Menurut Bank Dunia, Internasional, PT.
Pusri dan Pasar.
Parameter Kualitas Satuan
Standar Kualitas Bank
Dunia Internasional PT.
Pusri Pasar
Kualitas Fisik % Berat Kering ≤ 45 ≤ 25 - ≤ 20
a) Kadar Air Dimesionless - < 40 -
b) Kadar Humus Dimesionless - ± 7,5 - ± 7,5
c) pH Dimesionless - - -
d) Bau Dimesionless - bau Tanah - Bau
Tanah
Kadar Unsur Hara
a) N (Nitrogen) % Berat Kering - - ≥ 2,12 ≥ 2,30
b) P2O5 (Fosfor) % Berat Kering - ≥ 6,00 ≥ 1,30 ≥ 1,60
c) K2O (kalium) % Berat Kering - - ≥ 2,00 ≥ 2,40
d) Mg (Magnesium) % Berat Kering - - ≥ 3,19 ≥ 3,25
e) S (Belerang) % Berat Kering - - ≥ 0,01 ≥ 0,02
f) Mo (Molybdenum) % Berat Kering - - ≥ 0,05 ≥ 0,10
g) B (Boron) % Berat Kering - - ≥ 0,09 ≥ 0,10
h) Ca (Kalsium) % Berat Kering - - ≥ 0,97 ≥ 1,00
i) C/N Ratio Dimesionless ≤ 20 ≤ 20 - ≥ 15
Kadar Logam Berat
a) As (Arsenik) mg/kg Berat Kering - < 10 - < 10
b) Cd (Cadmium) mg/kg Berat Kering - < 3 - < 3
c) Cr (Cromium) mg/kg Berat Kering < 45 < 45 - < 45 d) Cu (Tembaga) mg/kg Berat Kering < 150 < 150 - < 150
e) Hg (Merkuri) mg/kg Berat Kering - < 1 - < 1
f) Ni (Nikel) mg/kg Berat Kering - < 50 - < 50
g) Pb (Timbal) mg/kg Berat Kering < 150 < 150 - < 150 h) Zn (Seng) mg/kg Berat Kering < 400 < 400 - <400
Kualitas Biologis
a) Coliform MPN/g - < 1000 - -
b) Salmonella sp. MPN/g - < 3 - -
Lampiran 2. Perhitungan a. Kadar bahan organik
% Kadar Bahan Organik =berat kering − berat abu
berat kering × 100%
Berat kering = 1,58g Berat abu = 1,37g
% Kadar Bahan Organik =1,58g − 1,37g
1,58g × 100%
% Kadar Bahan Organik = 13,29%
b. Kemampuan ikat air
%𝑊𝐻𝐶 = { 𝑊𝑠 − 𝑊0 + (𝑀𝑐 × 𝑊𝑜)}
{(1 − 𝑀𝑐) × 𝑊0} × 100%
W0 (berat awal) = 2,03g Ws (berat jenuh) = 3,62g Mc (kadar air) = 0,22g/g
%𝑊𝐻𝐶 ={ 3,62𝑔 − 2,03𝑔 + (0,22 × 2,03𝑔)}
{(1 − 0,22) × 2,03𝑔} × 100%
%𝑊𝐻𝐶 = 134%
Terjadi peningkatan 34%
c. Total C
TOC =KBO − TN 1,82 KBO = 98,946
TN = 1,607
TOC =98,946 − 1,607 1,82 TOC = 53,483
TOC/tanaman = TOC × Berat kering TOC = 53,483 × 91
TOC = 4866,953 mg/tanaman
Lampiran 3.Data Hasil Ragam Pengukuran pH Tanah Awal Deskriptif
Nilai pH tanah awal
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval for
Mean Minimum Maximum
Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 2 5,5600 ,00000 ,00000 5,5600 5,5600 5,56 5,56
2 2 6,2850 ,00707 ,00500 6,2215 6,3485 6,28 6,29
3 2 6,3750 ,04950 ,03500 5,9303 6,8197 6,34 6,41
4 2 6,5600 ,07071 ,05000 5,9247 7,1953 6,51 6,61
5 2 6,8300 ,00000 ,00000 6,8300 6,8300 6,83 6,83
6 2 5,5600 ,00000 ,00000 5,5600 5,5600 5,56 5,56
7 2 6,2850 ,00707 ,00500 6,2215 6,3485 6,28 6,29
8 2 6,3750 ,04950 ,03500 5,9303 6,8197 6,34 6,41
9 2 6,5600 ,07071 ,05000 5,9247 7,1953 6,51 6,61
10 2 6,8300 ,00000 ,00000 6,8300 6,8300 6,83 6,83
Total 20 6,3220 ,43608 ,09751 6,1179 6,5261 5,56 6,83
Hasil uji Anova Nilai pH tanah awal
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 3,598 9 ,400 266,527 ,000
Within Groups ,015 10 ,002
Total 3,613 19
Hasil uji Duncan
perlakuan N
Subset for alpha = .05
1 2 3 4
1 2 5,5600
6 2 5,5600
2 2 6,2850
7 2 6,2850
3 2 6,3750
8 2 6,3750
4 2 6,5600
9 2 6,5600
5 2 6,8300
10 2 6,8300
Sig. 1,000 ,055 1,000 1,000
Means untuk setiap kelompok subset menunjukkan keseragaman
Lampiran 4.Data Hasil Ragam Pengukuran pH Tanah Akhir Deskriptif
Nilai pH tanah akhir
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval for
Mean Minimum Maximum
Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 2 5,7450 ,14849 ,10500 4,4108 7,0792 5,64 5,85
2 2 6,0750 ,02121 ,01500 5,8844 6,2656 6,06 6,09
3 2 6,2700 ,02828 ,02000 6,0159 6,5241 6,25 6,29
4 2 6,7400 ,01414 ,01000 6,6129 6,8671 6,73 6,75
5 2 7,5050 ,00707 ,00500 7,4415 7,5685 7,50 7,51
6 2 5,7850 ,12021 ,08500 4,7050 6,8650 5,70 5,87
7 2 6,1300 ,01414 ,01000 6,0029 6,2571 6,12 6,14
8 2 6,2400 ,01414 ,01000 6,1129 6,3671 6,23 6,25
9 2 6,7450 ,04950 ,03500 6,3003 7,1897 6,71 6,78
10 2 7,5100 ,00000 ,00000 7,5100 7,5100 7,51 7,51
Total 20 6,4745 ,62247 ,13919 6,1832 6,7658 5,64 7,51
Hasil uji Anova Nilai pH tanah akhir
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 7,321 9 ,813 199,131 ,000
Within Groups ,041 10 ,004
Total 7,362 19
Hasil uji Duncan
perlakuan N
Subset for alpha = .05
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 5,7450
6 2 5,7850
2 2 6,0750
7 2 6,1300 6,1300
8 2 6,2400
3 2 6,2700
4 2 6,7400
9 2 6,7450
5 2 7,5050
10 2 7,5100
Sig. ,545 ,410 ,063 ,939 ,939
Means untuk setiap kelompok subset menunjukkan keseragaman
Lampiran 5. Data Hasil Ragam Pengukuran KBO Tanah Awal Deskriptif
Nilai KBO tanah awal
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval for
Mean Minimum Maximum
Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 2 14,0000 ,00000 ,00000 14,0000 14,0000 14,00 14,00
2 2 16,0000 1,41421 1,00000 3,2938 28,7062 15,00 17,00
3 2 15,5000 ,70711 ,50000 9,1469 21,8531 15,00 16,00
4 2 17,0000 ,00000 ,00000 17,0000 17,0000 17,00 17,00
5 2 19,5000 ,70711 ,50000 13,1469 25,8531 19,00 20,00
6 2 14,0000 ,00000 ,00000 14,0000 14,0000 14,00 14,00
7 2 16,0000 1,41421 1,00000 3,2938 28,7062 15,00 17,00
8 2 15,5000 ,70711 ,50000 9,1469 21,8531 15,00 16,00
9 2 17,0000 ,00000 ,00000 17,0000 17,0000 17,00 17,00
10 2 19,5000 ,70711 ,50000 13,1469 25,8531 19,00 20,00
Total 20 16,4000 1,95744 ,43770 15,4839 17,3161 14,00 20,00
Hasil uji Anova Nilai KBO tanah awal
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 66,800 9 7,422 12,370 ,000
Within Groups 6,000 10 ,600
Total 72,800 19
Hasil uji Duncan
perlakuan N
Subset for alpha = .05
1 2 3
1 2 14,0000
6 2 14,0000
3 2 15,5000 15,5000
8 2 15,5000 15,5000
2 2 16,0000
7 2 16,0000
4 2 17,0000
9 2 17,0000
5 2 19,5000
10 2 19,5000
Sig. ,101 ,108 1,000
Means untuk setiap kelompok subset menunjukkan keseragaman
Lampiran 6. Data Hasil Ragam Pengukuran KBO Tanah Akhir Deskriptif
Nilai KBO tanah akhir
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval for
Mean Minimum Maximum
Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 2 13,0000 ,00000 ,00000 13,0000 13,0000 13,00 13,00
2 2 14,0000 ,00000 ,00000 14,0000 14,0000 14,00 14,00
3 2 14,5000 ,70711 ,50000 8,1469 20,8531 14,00 15,00
4 2 16,5000 2,12132 1,50000 -2,5593 35,5593 15,00 18,00
5 2 18,0000 ,00000 ,00000 18,0000 18,0000 18,00 18,00
6 2 15,0000 ,00000 ,00000 15,0000 15,0000 15,00 15,00
7 2 16,0000 ,00000 ,00000 16,0000 16,0000 16,00 16,00
8 2 17,0000 ,00000 ,00000 17,0000 17,0000 17,00 17,00
9 2 19,0000 ,00000 ,00000 19,0000 19,0000 19,00 19,00
10 2 20,5000 ,70711 ,50000 14,1469 26,8531 20,00 21,00
Total 20 16,3500 2,34577 ,52453 15,2521 17,4479 13,00 21,00
Hasil uji Anova Nilai KBO tanah akhir
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 99,050 9 11,006 20,010 ,000
Within Groups 5,500 10 ,550
Total 104,550 19
Hasil uji Duncan
perlakuan N Subset for alpha = .05
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 2 13,0000
2 2 14,0000 14,0000
3 2 14,5000 14,5000 14,5000
6 2 15,0000 15,0000 15,0000
7 2 16,0000 16,0000 16,0000
4 2 16,5000 16,5000 16,5000
8 2 17,0000 17,0000
5 2 18,0000 18,0000
9 2 19,0000 19,0000
10 2 20,5000
Sig. ,082 ,227 ,082 ,082 ,227 ,082 ,207 ,071
Means untuk setiap kelompok subset menunjukkan keseragaman
Lampiran 7. Data Hasil Ragam Pengukuran WHC Tanah Deskriptif
Nilai WHC tanah
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval for
Mean Minimum Maximum
Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 2 1,3800 ,05657 ,04000 ,8718 1,8882 1,34 1,42
2 2 1,4650 ,03536 ,02500 1,1473 1,7827 1,44 1,49
3 2 1,5000 ,05657 ,04000 ,9918 2,0082 1,46 1,54
4 2 1,5500 ,01414 ,01000 1,4229 1,6771 1,54 1,56
5 2 1,7500 ,00000 ,00000 1,7500 1,7500 1,75 1,75
6 2 1,2350 ,02121 ,01500 1,0444 1,4256 1,22 1,25
7 2 1,2750 ,10607 ,07500 ,3220 2,2280 1,20 1,35
8 2 1,2900 ,01414 ,01000 1,1629 1,4171 1,28 1,30
9 2 1,4750 ,09192 ,06500 ,6491 2,3009 1,41 1,54
10 2 1,5300 ,01414 ,01000 1,4029 1,6571 1,52 1,54
Total 20 1,4450 ,15595 ,03487 1,3720 1,5180 1,20 1,75
Hasil uji Anova Nilai WHC tanah
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups ,434 9 ,048 16,968 ,000
Within Groups ,028 10 ,003
Total ,462 19
Hasil uji Duncan
perlakuan N Subset for alpha = .05
1 2 3 4 5
6 2 1,2350
7 2 1,2750 1,2750
8 2 1,2900 1,2900
1 2 1,3800 1,3800
2 2 1,4650 1,4650
9 2 1,4750 1,4750
3 2 1,5000 1,5000
10 2 1,5300
4 2 1,5500
5 2 1,7500
Sig. ,348 ,089 ,062 ,173 1,000
Means untuk setiap kelompok subset menunjukkan keseragaman
Lampiran 8. Data Hasil Ragam Pengukuran Tinggi Jagung (Zea mays L.) Deskriptif
Tinggi jagung
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval for
Mean Minimum Maximum
Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 2 154,0000 9,89949 7,00000 65,0566 242,9434 147,00 161,00
2 2 164,0000 1,41421 1,00000 151,2938 176,7062 163,00 165,00
3 2 167,0000 2,82843 2,00000 141,5876 192,4124 165,00 169,00
4 2 150,0000 ,00000 ,00000 150,0000 150,0000 150,00 150,00
5 2 159,0000 2,82843 2,00000 133,5876 184,4124 157,00 161,00
6 2 153,5000 4,94975 3,50000 109,0283 197,9717 150,00 157,00
7 2 167,0000 5,65685 4,00000 116,1752 217,8248 163,00 171,00
8 2 165,0000 21,21320 15,00000 -25,5931 355,5931 150,00 180,00
9 2 170,0000 14,14214 10,00000 42,9380 297,0620 160,00 180,00
10 2 159,5000 ,70711 ,50000 153,1469 165,8531 159,00 160,00
Total 20 160,9000 9,30139 2,07985 156,5468 165,2532 147,00 180,00
Hasil uji Anova Tinggi jagung
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 820,800 9 91,200 1,108 ,434
Within Groups 823,000 10 82,300
Total 1643,800 19
Hasil uji Duncan
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 820,800 9 91,200 1,108 ,434 Within Groups 823,000 10 82,300
Total 1643,800 19
Means untuk setiap kelompok subset menunjukkan keseragaman
Lampiran 9. Data Hasil Ragam Pengukuran Berat Basah Jagung (Zea mays L.) Deskriptif
Berat basah jagung
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval for
Mean Minimum Maximum
Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 2 245,0000 63,63961 45,00000 -326,7792 816,7792 200,00 290,00
2 2 370,0000 14,14214 10,00000 242,9380 497,0620 360,00 380,00
3 2 430,0000 14,14214 10,00000 302,9380 557,0620 420,00 440,00
4 2 260,0000 14,14214 10,00000 132,9380 387,0620 250,00 270,00
5 2 440,0000 42,42641 30,00000 58,8139 821,1861 410,00 470,00
6 2 230,0000 14,14214 10,00000 102,9380 357,0620 220,00 240,00
7 2 310,0000 14,14214 10,00000 182,9380 437,0620 300,00 320,00
8 2 410,0000 254,55844 180,00000 -1877,1169 2697,1169 230,00 590,00 9 2 425,0000 120,20815 85,00000 -655,0274 1505,0274 340,00 510,00
10 2 395,0000 49,49747 35,00000 -49,7172 839,7172 360,00 430,00
Total 20 351,5000 105,39525 23,56709 302,1735 400,8265 200,00 590,00
Hasil uji Anova Berat basah jagung
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 122505,00
0 9 13611,667 1,537 ,256
Within Groups 88550,000 10 8855,000
Total 211055,00
0 19
Hasil uji Duncan
perlakuan N
Subset for alpha =
.05 1
6 2 230,0000
1 2 245,0000
4 2 260,0000
7 2 310,0000
2 2 370,0000
10 2 395,0000
8 2 410,0000
9 2 425,0000
3 2 430,0000
5 2 440,0000
Sig. ,073
Means untuk setiap kelompok subset menunjukkan keseragaman
Lampiran 10. Data Hasil Ragam Pengukuran Berat Kering Jagung (Zea mays L.) Deskriptif
Berat kering jagung
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval for
Mean Minimum Maximum
Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 2 91,0000 24,04163 17,00000 -125,0055 307,0055 74,00 108,00
2 2 137,5000 4,94975 3,50000 93,0283 181,9717 134,00 141,00
3 2 160,0000 5,65685 4,00000 109,1752 210,8248 156,00 164,00
4 2 97,0000 5,65685 4,00000 46,1752 147,8248 93,00 101,00
5 2 164,0000 15,55635 11,00000 24,2317 303,7683 153,00 175,00
6 2 85,5000 4,94975 3,50000 41,0283 129,9717 82,00 89,00
7 2 115,5000 4,94975 3,50000 71,0283 159,9717 112,00 119,00
8 2 153,0000 94,75231 67,00000 -698,3157 1004,3157 86,00 220,00
9 2 158,5000 44,54773 31,50000 -241,7454 558,7454 127,00 190,00
10 2 147,0000 18,38478 13,00000 -18,1807 312,1807 134,00 160,00
Total 20 130,9000 39,28827 8,78512 112,5125 149,2875 74,00 220,00
Hasil uji Anova Berat kering jagung
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 17069,800 9 1896,644 1,547 ,253
Within Groups 12258,000 10 1225,800
Total 29327,800 19
Hasil uji Duncan
perlakuan N
Subset for alpha =
.05 1
6 2 85,5000
1 2 91,0000
4 2 97,0000
7 2 115,5000
2 2 137,5000
10 2 147,0000
8 2 153,0000
9 2 158,5000
3 2 160,0000
5 2 164,0000
Sig. ,072
Means untuk setiap kelompok subset menunjukkan keseragaman
Lampiran 11. Data Hasil Ragam Pengukuran Kadar C Jagung (Zea mays L.) Deskriptif
Kadar C total jagung
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval for
Mean Minimum Maximum
Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 4 48675,0038 10254,10080 5127,05040 32358,4411 64991,5664 39760,49 57615,62 2 4 73425,3080 2514,71156 1257,35578 69423,8407 77426,7753 71170,54 75689,97 3 4 85189,2800 2469,66084 1234,83042 81259,4985 89119,0615 83039,99 87407,25 4 4 51176,0958 2534,32025 1267,16012 47143,4267 55208,7648 48662,86 53429,17 5 4 87588,8848 6645,05356 3322,52678 77015,1217 98162,6478 81810,87 93488,60 6 4 45264,1235 1953,77294 976,88647 42155,2348 48373,0122 43507,26 47109,45 7 4 61420,5688 2037,29008 1018,64504 58178,7856 64662,3519 59630,90 63237,98 8 4 81433,9780 41606,48033 20803,24017 15228,7832 147639,1728 45211,86 117498,1 9 4 84217,3793 19225,63607 9612,81803 53625,1020 114809,6565 67432,73 100958,4 10 4 77881,1703 7834,19580 3917,09790 65415,2165 90347,1240 71065,14 84727,69 Total 40 69627,1792 20739,24893 3279,16318 62994,4456 76259,9128 39760,49 117498,1
Hasil uji Anova Kadar C total jagung
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 975989403
3,191 9 1084432670,3
55 4,638 ,001
Within Groups 701464736
8,191 30 233821578,94 0
Total 167745414
01,382 39
Hasil uji Duncan
perlakuan N Subset for alpha = .05
1 2 3 4
6 4 45264,1235
1 4 48675,0038
4 4 51176,0958 51176,0958
7 4 61420,5688 61420,5688 61420,5688
2 4 73425,3080 73425,3080 73425,3080
10 4 77881,1703 77881,1703
8 4 81433,9780 81433,9780
9 4 84217,3793 84217,3793
3 4 85189,2800 85189,2800
5 4 87588,8848
Sig. ,182 ,060 ,061 ,259
Means untuk setiap kelompok subset menunjukkan keseragaman
Lampiran 12.Data Hasil Ragam Pengukuran Kadar N Jagung (Zea mays L.) Deskriptif
Kadar N total jagung
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval for
Mean Minimum Maximum
Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 2 146,6015 38,07982 26,92650 -195,5321 488,7351 119,68 173,53
2 2 265,8985 10,16325 7,18650 174,5854 357,2116 258,71 273,09
3 2 328,2300 10,79469 7,63300 231,2435 425,2165 320,60 335,86
4 2 226,7335 12,33265 8,72050 115,9290 337,5380 218,01 235,45
5 2 320,9480 30,44378 21,52700 47,4215 594,4745 299,42 342,48
6 2 173,4795 10,04304 7,10150 83,2464 263,7126 166,38 180,58
7 2 216,3315 9,27088 6,55550 133,0360 299,6270 209,78 222,89
8 2 305,5410 189,22036 133,79900 -1394,5365 2005,6185 171,74 439,34 9 2 360,1120 101,21244 71,56800 -549,2457 1269,4697 288,54 431,68
10 2 340,4520 42,57914 30,10800 -42,1064 723,0104 310,34 370,56
Total 20 268,4328 88,86398 19,87059 226,8431 310,0224 119,68 439,34
Hasil uji Anova Kadar N total jagung
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 99242,411 9 11026,935 2,171 ,122
Within Groups 50796,905 10 5079,690
Total 150039,31
5 19
Hasil uji Duncan
perlakuan N Subset for alpha = .05
1 2 3
1 2 146,6015
6 2 173,4795 173,4795
7 2 216,3315 216,3315 216,3315
4 2 226,7335 226,7335 226,7335
2 2 265,8985 265,8985 265,8985
8 2 305,5410 305,5410 305,5410
5 2 320,9480 320,9480 320,9480
3 2 328,2300 328,2300
10 2 340,4520 340,4520
9 2 360,1120
Sig. ,052 ,061 ,098
Means untuk setiap kelompok subset menunjukkan keseragaman
Lampiran 13. Data Hasil Ragam Pengukuran Nisbah C/N Jagung (Zea mays L.) Deskriptif
Nisbah C/N jagung
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval for
Mean Minimum Maximum
Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 2 33,2105 ,06010 ,04250 32,6705 33,7505 33,17 33,25
2 2 27,6120 ,10182 ,07200 26,6972 28,5268 27,54 27,68
3 2 25,9530 ,06788 ,04800 25,3431 26,5629 25,91 26,00
4 2 22,5675 ,13364 ,09450 21,3668 23,7682 22,47 22,66
5 2 27,2930 ,05374 ,03800 26,8102 27,7758 27,26 27,33
6 2 26,0955 ,13506 ,09550 24,8821 27,3089 26,00 26,19
7 2 28,3930 ,06364 ,04500 27,8212 28,9648 28,35 28,44
8 2 26,5865 ,21284 ,15050 24,6742 28,4988 26,44 26,74
9 2 23,3915 ,03606 ,02550 23,0675 23,7155 23,37 23,42
10 2 22,8785 ,04313 ,03050 22,4910 23,2660 22,85 22,91
Total 20 26,3981 3,06326 ,68497 24,9645 27,8317 22,47 33,25
Hasil uji Anova Nisbah C/N jagung
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 178,177 9 19,797 1798,317 ,000
Within Groups ,110 10 ,011
Total 178,288 19
Hasil uji Duncan
perlakuan N Subset for alpha = .05
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
4 2 22,5675
10 2 22,8785
9 2 23,3915
3 2 25,9530
6 2 26,0955
8 2 26,5865
5 2 27,2930
2 2 27,6120
7 2 28,3930
1 2 33,2105
Sig. 1,000 1,000 1,000 ,204 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
Means untuk setiap kelompok subset menunjukkan keseragaman
Lampiran 14. Media plot
Lampiran 15. Jagung variasi media plot
Perlakuan 1 Perlakuan 2
(Tanah merah) (TM + kompos 6 ton/ha)
Perlakuan 3 Perlakuan 4
(TM + kompos 12 ton/ha) (TM + kompos 24 ton/ha)
Perlakuan 5 Perlakuan 6
(TM + kompos 48 ton/ha) (TM + mikroba)
Perlakuan 7 Perlakuan 8
(TM + kompos 6 ton/ha + mikroba) (TM + kompos 12 ton/ha + mikroba)