ناریا ینابغاب مولع

53 1

1401 ) 85 - 75

( Vol 53, No 1, Spring 2022 (75-85)

DOI:10.22059/ijhs.2021.315279.1886

* Corresponding author E-mail:hosinrezvani@yahoo.com

:

!"

# $%

&

' (

) Rosa damascena Mill (

!

! +

, +-

1 $ . 1 * 22 3

1 5 67

3 67 ' 9 : "

3

1 . !"

#

# $%&

# '

# & &

#

2 . )*

+$

'

# '

# ,

#

3 . . / 0/

0%1 2 !"

#

# $%&

# '

# & &

#

3 ) :)6

26 / 10 / 1399 - 3 : <=

1 / 8 / 1400 (

2' ;

+ A B

C ) D E%C*

F&

2

# G HI J F&

0C K

F 6

LM N O "

P % J F 6 K +

E +*

!"

# $%&

Q J 1399 - 1397 2

0 &

. S O "

F * Q C ) D +

TU ) VW 5 10 S ( EJ F * Y G HI J F&

0C ,Z TU

)

# /

# C [

# \ ]

# $%&

( 0H . S

^ _ V

` + = 0 F&

+ = UN F&

# F&

a + =

#

F&

b c + = E%C*

F&

a E%C*

F&

b c J

C a 0H

&

0H0/

. ' H

# H S

L J C AH

C VW + M U

V TU

Q C d b 0W 2 .)/

S _ V

` + S 0 F&

+ S UN F&

S E%C*

F&

a E%C*

F&

b c C

G HI J )M d e 0d

C ) D a ) S

EJ ( FW d

&

0 . AH E%C*

F&

G HI

# / EC*

F&

a 35 / 2319 Y & % EJ E%C*

F&

b c 22 / 651

Y & % EJ S

G HI

# $%&

E%C*

F&

a 16 / 1317 Y & % EJ E%C*

F&

b c 23 / 452 Y & %

EJ S C E%C*

F&

.0 / S fCJ 1 $!CJ S

c VW C S

^ H

# E%C*

F&

b c EJ

g

U g + h $ i 0 F&

+ = ) 95 / 0

= ( r E%C*

a F&

) 96 / 0

= ( r .)/

2%

&

' HI: G E%C*

F&

UN F&

F&

0C C

.) D

Effects of different levels of vermicompost on flower yield and its components in genotypes of Damask rose (Rosa damascena Mill.) in Golestan province

Hossein Rezvani^1*, Ali baba Golzadeh², Gholam-Ali Gholami³ and Majid Asiai³

1. Assistant Professor, Golestan Agriculture and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Gorgan, Iran 2. Ph.D. in Agronomy of Institute of Education and Extension, AREEO, Tehran, Iran

3. M.Sc. in Forestry, Golestan Agriculture and Natural Resources Research and Education Center. AREEO, Gorgan, Iran (Received: Jan. 15, 2020 - Accepted: Oct. 23, 2020)

ABSTRACT

In order to investigate the effect of vermicompost on the floweryield and its components in genotypesof Damask rose (Rosa damascena Mill.), a factorial experiment was carried out based on randomized complete blocks design with three replications since 2018-2020 years in the Research Field of Golestan Research Center of Agriculture and Natural Resources.

Experimental factors were included three levels of vermicompost (0, 5 and 10 ton ha^-1) and four levels of Damask rose genotypes (Kashan, Semnan, Azerbaijan Garbi and Golestan). In this experiment, average plant height, number of flower per plant, flower diameter, fresh weight of flower per plant, dray weight of flower per plant, yield of fresh flowers and yield of dry flowers were measured for each treatment. The results showed that there was a significant difference between the treatments combinations in terms of all the studied traits (P<0.01). The highest average plant height, maximum number of flowers per plant, highest flower diameter, highest fresh flower yield and dry flower yield were obtained in all genotypes in the maximum application of vermicompost (10 ton/ha). In terms of flower yield, Kashan genotype with fresh flower yield 2319.35 kg/ha and yield of dry flower with 651.22 kg/ha has the highest and Golestan genotype with fresh flower yield 1317.16 kg/ha and dry flower yield with 452.23 kg/ha had the lowest flower yield. Also signification correlation was observed between some of the quantitative traits in this experiment, yield of dry flowers per hectare direct and high relationship with the number of flowers per plant (r=0.95) and fresh flower yield (r = 0.96).

Keywords: Flower diameter, flower yield, genotype, Rosa damascena Mill, vermicompost.

= '>

12 58 9, :

)0

Rosa damascena Mill.

5 $

8#; "

< '

=>2

?@ A, B)*+, C

$D .E-

, F

A0 12 ),

$D

= G9, ,

$2

)

Omidbeigi, 2007

.(

FH' "

C 3I . - 12

58 9, FJ$0

5C E- E-

F KLD

*' D

8A , M I BJ ,$-

$, 5 2C ' .0 AN

O- FAD3 5 6 '

$#P EQ 6 , .8 R&'

.E- SD K #2

*'

*G)2 1 N F4 "

K T , C

U ' 1396 , U TW*' K$

$

$N F*I$2 .' .

$X-

*G - Y#

*'

*G)2

3#

ZD $ 2 ,6 :C[

5 $ . - FH' "

SD

K #2 .8 12 5 SD K #2 5 $ 8#; "

< '

=>2

\D AJ

$&0 5C ' ED 6

* 8 D

D ]^

, K B*'

$N , 8 $#2 ) Baydar et al.,

2008 .( SD $ A F4 "

F _ `, 2 2 F-

12

58 9,

\D AJ ()*+, YT'

K8 .'

U ' 5

$#a F4 "

5 DC F SD K #2 U ]T, . $2

$b

F .#

12 58 9, c J

*B $#^

E-

5 6C K 6$I 5 6 F KLD

=>2

< '

d $+*'

=>2

< ' 12 8,6 1J e C .E- 12

58 9, 1 N F4 "

8 a .

S#Af gD 3I 8,6

C E-

* h $I O#W*G, 12 gD 3I 8 a

.I D )

Omidbeigi, 2007

.(

' $ E

K 8 F-

K 5

;6 C F) 4

5 -

, , - .' /

K >0

$ c $!

58#B, F-

$ c #J `a D3#I

D # # Di ; # 53#+)J e

j a 8 D C

- O , 5 j a

= G9, , 8 )

.(Arancon

et al., 2011

K B*' :k "

C

5 -

;6 8H, F

A"

C # F _$`,

5 -

D # # g -

, 8

F ) F K$#al 5i$

53#+)J e j a

gD 3I 8#; "

U `9, g -

2 ;6 Z#9, .GDC ,

$2

) .(Sinha et al., 2010

C I$@

8#; "

`9, [ c D ]^

.#B#- K B*'

C

5 -

*GDC F A"

m0

.D

$@ a _$`, 28AA- ,

F ) S#,n"

S# o"

'

>

., G4 6 3#

p . SD $ A

5 $

#*' F _ 8 5C E- 8D p

K B*' C

5 5 $ S#,n"

5 C # D ]^

K #2 F q - c 4 ,

K8 C S- ' j a 5 $ 8 a

)

.(Supratim et al., 2018

S#Af h 32 8D $2 F-

gD 3I

% &' , .' / - 3#,

i $*#

SD

$J A0

3#

gD 3I .I D F 5 @ F-

$ - 63 S"

, .' / - SD$*E#

8W, F a

`*a .

S#Af SD WW9, h 32

8 $- F- 3I

, .' / - F

j a F A"

O $I

$-

$J A0

D ]^

, C # K #2 gD 3I , 8 F ) T

ZD $ D3#I 5 8AD $I

" #e j a S rD

qD

$*G Y' A, 5 $ 8 FED YT' gD 3I 8

\D$G"

gA- 5 G#; *, ,

)

Gurav et al.,

.(2010

FH; &, 5 ' $

$!

5 -

#e

$

$ ) 0 - B#- 12 58 9, h 32 K8 .' F-

c $!

8#B,

$ - -

;6 m0 gD 3I s B"

Z' *,

F"

.e G,

$&N d "

g p

$&N 12

$ ) 0 12

K8 .' )

Rahmani et al., 2013

. (

D C ), 0 F-

$ 5 c BJ Di ; I , 8

12 58 9,

$#!n"

K B*' C

5 -

D # ,

, 8 F-

Y#-$"

8 - K $ 5 # 6 1, 0

, C # 5 $

8 FH' "

K #2 K$#al

=6 i $*#

.'

)

Omidbeigi, 2007

.(

S#Af h 32 K8

.' 12

58 9,

#2 .' F- 8 3#, 8)2 F"

5

6 c8E

$ 5 $`A0 D ]^

F*G .' 5 $ F

.' 6

$ ) 0 Y' A,

*GD tD]u"

T' A,

c J

$#2

.(Rezaee et al., 2013)

FH; &, 5$PD

F- s A"

#* i

$ ) 0 12

c #J `a

Di ; I , 12

58 9, .E

v#" i FW&A,

=$^

E- ' $

8 $- w+E, 8D $2

v#" i 5

rD l6

$^

r C 1#

5 SD$*E#

$ ) 0

8A*G

) Tabaei-Aghdaei et al., 2004

.(

S#Af

#)N ZD $ .9" K8 : r ' $ *' $-

v#" i S# 8D $2 w+E, $b C 5 AH, _>*a

12 $ ) 0 c BJ 6 5 34

5 @ F . 4

12 $ ) 0 F- 12 5 34

v#" i C $*E# 3W'

D$, )

Yousefi1 & Fadakar., 2022

.(

?#W9"

5$PD ' $

< ' 12 58 9,

?@ A, U

$^

53-$, E- w+E, 8D $2 F- 3#,

< '

Y#-$"

5 K8 0 12 58 9, x 8T,

rD l6 N$

g#

C v#" i 5 FW&A, - ..' SD _>*a

F O^

.E- v#" i

y I ZD $

&#9, G D

K8 E, K8D $2 .' F- E K8A _>*a

58A "

5

#* i 6 C

$b .# - .#B#-

< ' 5$"$

12 58 9, rD l6 .'

)

Rahamani

et al., 2013

(.

F )- @ C D r 6 F- c 0>@

58A*G,

, .E- v#" i 5 12 58 9, S#Af

$ -

5 -

qDi ; #

*'

*G)2 4 8

FH; &,

$ e 5 *'

_$`, FA#

C

5 -

, - .' / v#" i

5 ()*+, 12 58 9,

I$H, SD$*

v#" i ZD $

=6 z

FW&A,

e $@

$4 8 .

?

&

gD ,C6 2$2

F0 3,

" W#W9"

3-$, c W#W9"

hC ,6 5C E-

\ A, H#T@

*'

*G)2

S#P #, 28

F #; ' 450 - 400 )#,

$*, s B"

160

$*, C R&' D c `*+, D #I $u4

U @ 54

F4 25 FW#N N$

|$0 36 F4 45 FW#N

; U ' 5 1399 - 1397 : r .8 . 4

D ' A .#H j a 19, : r gD ,C6 F

Y-$,

C

? 0

$BJ "

30 30 "

60

* ' 5$*, F# "

a D3#I D # #

j a F0 3, ,

- .' /

K PED ,C6 FD3r"

j a 3-$, c W#W9"

5C E-

\ A, H#T@

*'

*G)2 F

%$

U 84 5 1 2

1Dl S##H"

.8

F gD ,C6 Y; N 1D *- I c J

j ) %$@

5

I `" 1, - F'

$ "

$4 F Ki $p SD .8,6

1, 0 U 1, , - $BJ) R&' F' .' / 5

10 ( * S"

" i : 1, 0

# v 5 58 9, 12

" i) 1, R&' Q

# v 5 - A ' l6

D r

$^

( *G)2 8

5C ' K ,6 c #) 0 .

U U ' 3#D p S#,C R#&G" qGD O+ 1, ED ,C6 FEW F# " C <p .8D $2 : r gD ,C6

- U . U ' K , SD $I 1D

1397 : r

.8 F ) C # , - }D * F F4 " (FD p - A0

Y' A, 5 - F#J " j a D ]^ , FD3r"

M ' SD $ .8D $2 _$`,

$D W,

5 -

K$BGI

F' *p F 8W, 60 :$2 )#-

* 8#G-

$BGI

8#G- M *p F Y#"$"

\TA, C 5 -

$p ' c BGI

1/D$"

c B; ' O#' *p 1TN U . - C F

S#,C

K U .8 v#" i 58 9, 12 FH; &, , 5

*G)2 F *G D #2 .-$ C ~ W C

()*+, F# " E- .8D $2

$

$ "

12 c$-

$ c$- F' U 58 9, 12 v#" i C

*+, 5 ()

F F* - $*, 1J I c$- S# 1J I .8 8

F'

$ .8 F*I$2 $b $*, 5

. - 0

U #"

5 - 2 U KC 8 F D 70

× 70

* ' F $*,

? 0 100

* '

$*,

$Be 8 , - .' /

M ' $

#"

5 ,

$b a j )+,

~

2 U F*+D U </' .8 5

C K8 F# "

v#" i SD $I 1D ()*+, 5 U 2 F K ,

5

.8 8D $2 1W*A, K8 K ,6 C 5 # 6 c #) 0 5 $

K$&N 5 # 6 O*G#' 8D $2 K B*' 5

S#Af .

()0 KC T, 1#TN C . c #) 0 $D ' :C[ \N , qa q' ' c I6 KC T, .' C$ 5

$' 8A) S#Af a K $2 q' ' a Fa

: r gD ,C6 5 $4 U @ € C 5 # KC T, . 4 ..I$2 KC T,

q' ' .I6 qa

8A)

F)J I>

: 8N F M$

Fa $' 8e

10

* '

$*, S#D p

$"

C 19, 2 ;6 d a

$- C

F0 3, S*a ' 5 D W 6 8D $2 : 8N .

U 84

1 . c #J `a D3#I

D # # j a 19, gD ,C6 .

Table 1. Physical and chemical soil properties of the experimental site.

Potassium (mg/g) Phosphorus

(mg/g) Organic Carbon

(%) Nitrogen

(mg/g) EC

(dS/m) pH

Texture

118 9

1.23 0.17

1.07 6.5

Loamy clay

U 84

2 . c #J `a D3#I

D # # , .' / - .

Table 2. Physicochemical properties of vermicompost.

Potassium (mg/g) Phosphorus

(mg/g) Nitrogen

(mg/g) Calssium

(mg/g) Magnesium

(mg/g) Organic Carbon

(%) EC

(dS/m) pH

1.65 1.81

1.55 0.95

0.19 12.54

1.85 7.1

U$*A- q' ' K $2 a K B*' C F)"

5 1&'

6

€ F- 5 *9,

~ )+,

=6 S•^

q;

F )

bA, Y)4

\ 4 5 6 (q' ' : r

..I$2

S#Af 5 $ KC T, 5 #

€ C C K B*' C

‚ N g-

#"

.) F 3#, qD 3 .E TD

K ,

F ƒ9,

„ S#;

Oz>0 5 # : 8N F / '

.8D $2 SD

gD ,C6 2LD

D 8A , s B"

Z' *,

FD p 8H"

12 FD p

$&N 12 C 12 KC "

FD p

C 12 qEa FD p

$ ) 0 12 KC "

$ ) 0 12

qEa 5 $

$

#"

KC 8 5$#2 8 8 . F4 "

F F AD

$ ) 0 5 `*N 12

58 9, C

U ' : ' F 8H

, 8 F S#

1#;

SD gD ,C6 KC 8

5$#2

c BJ Di ; I ,

$ ) 0 12 U ' : ' ) 1399 (

s $ 8)2 : r .8 5 $ FT' 9, 2LD

8H"

12

$ FD p F4 "

F U @ K 12 . $ 12 -

F' ,C

$ qD C 5 8e ED ,C6 C

F'

FD p : r 8D $2

</' S#P #, 6 F A0 K8AD

8H"

12 .8D $2 bA, 5 $

$ qD C 1e $,

<p C

h 12 C KC "

6 3#

F F)#' qD 5 C $"

.N 01 / 0 :$2 FT' 9, K8

SD8 Y#"$"

S#P #,

C 12 KC "

FD p S#Af

s r, C 12 KC "

FD p 1J e C

\ 4 F' . . $ KC 8 5$#2

8D $2

) Tabaei-Aghdaei et al., 2004

C .(

12 KC "

12 1J e

$ Ge

• Y

$2 : 5 $

$ FD p .T!

8 F-

D p c T' 9, :C[

F bA, S##H"

$ ) 0 C

12 KC "

* c J .I$2 C .

qEa 12 3#

<p C

$N F

K P*' 6 5 ,

75

F4

* '

$2 F c8, 24 .0 ' FT' 9, 8D $2

)

Rahamani et al., 2013

(

$ .

qD C 1e $,

. $

$&N 12 3#

K B*' C qD

<#; - .N

05 / 0 )#,

$*, SDC "

.8 8

<p C KC 8 5$#2

2LD 5 D K8 FD3r"

5 ,6 K

K B*' C

:$

3I 5 ,6

SAS ver. 9.1

: r .8 F4 "

F

AH,

$!

1 W*, FGD W, S#P #,

#"

K F h h$

K B*' C ,C6 LSD

R&' U *e qD 8J c J ..I$2 S#Af

S##H"

P*GT S#

c BJ : r 8

Z#9,

Excel

O#'$"

.8 8

@: $ A(

}D * 1J e C FD3r"

< D K

5 gD ,C6

U 84 3 E F-

5 *- I v#" i

, - .' /

$!

1 W*, 6 R&'

U *e

qD 8J

$#! "

AH, 5

$ s B"

Z' *, FD p 5

12 58 9, .8A*

FGD W, S#P #,

$!

v#" i

E SD$"[

s B"

Z' *, FD p : "

#"

F v#" i - ) 78 / 145

* ' ($*, O- SD$"

6

F v#" i

*G)2 ) 58 / 124

* ' ($*,

?)H"

..

S#Af

$ ' M }D * SD Lp g Z' *, s B"

12 58 9, 3#

C 29 / 122

* '

$*, 8

8

_$`, ,

- .' / F 13 / 152

* '

$*,

#"

$X- 8e 8W, _$`, ,

- .' / K ) S"

( * 8#' F- YT' gD 3I 8e 20 58J

s B"

Z' *, FD p 12 58 9, 8D $2

U 84) 4 .(

, FGD W S#P #,

$!

1 W*, v#" i ,

- .' /

U 84) 5 ( E Z' *,

s B"

FD p 12 58 9,

gD 3I

% &' ,

- .' / , "

: N ,

FH; &, gD 3I ..I D F 5 @ F- gD 3I 3#,

, - .' / K ) S"

( * Z' *, s B"

FD p

12 58 9, C

29 / 120

* '

$*, 8

8

_$`, - F 145

* '

$*, SD$"[

R&'

$ - ,

- .' / ) S#P #, (: N

gD 3I

..I D _>*a s B"

S , .' F

*a '

* i

#

"

D

" i

# v 5 ()*+, K B*'

C

\ A, ()*+,

5 -

~ $, .8

5 -

qDi ; # F

;#

1 D S F-

5 e 8 $*- "C YT'

3I D g H' "

t D FE

=]4

$*

=6 , ]^

D , 8 F- F U T 6 8

D E 2

# K s B"

FD p 3I D g , D 8 )

Yanga et

al., 2015

.(

Tabaei-Aghdaei et al.

)

(2004

c H; &, 5

v#" i 5 12 58 9,

„

8A*

S#P #, s B"

FD p v#" i 5

()*+, 12

58 9, 5

FA, c $##u"

S#

120 "

213

* '

$*, . S#Af FH; &,

Rhamani et al.

) (2013

2 1 58 9, w+E, 8D $2

$ - -

;6

m0 gD 3I s B"

FD p v#" i 5 12 58 9,

8D $2 )

Kazaz et al., 2010

.(

g Lp 5$PD

$ 5

F )

Matricaria recutita L.

( h 32 8

$ -

, - .' / m0 gD 3I AH, s B"

Z' *, FD p

8D $2 )

Azizi et al., 2008

.(

!

"#

F P F- U 84 K

) 3 ( K8,6 .'

5 *- I ,

- .' / v#" i

$!

1 W*, 6

$#! "

AH, 5 R&' U *e qD 8J

$ 8H"

12 FD p .8A*

FGD W, S#P #,

$!

v#" i

E g#

SD$"

8H"

12 FD p ) 806 12

(FD p v#" i - O-

SD$"

8H"

12 FD p

) 468 12 (FD p v#" i

*G)2 F

.' .8,6

S#Af FGD W, S#P #,

#"

K B*' C

, - .' / 3#

E F-

$X- 8e 8W,

_$`, ,

- .' / K ) S"

( * FGD W,

:80

$ - SD - YT' gD 3I 38 58J 8H"

12 FD p 8D $2 U 84) 4 .(

FGD W, S#P #,

$!

1 W*, ,

- .' / v#" i

5 12 58 9,

E K8A 4 _>*a AH, S#

5 #"

ED ,C6 .

F 5 @ F-

$X- 8e

$ -

, - .' / K ) S"

( * SD$"[

8H"

12

FD p v#" i - ) 1008 12 (FD p 1J e

8 F- FGD W, v#" i

*G2 ) 624 12

(FD p g#

C 39 8J gD 3I E U 84)

5 .(

FH; &, 5$PD

F-

$ 5 K #2 D

FA,

Artemisia pallens)

r (

: 8D $2 w+E, 8

$`, _ .' / - , Y4 ,

T 1 N Fbe>, )2

8 SD

#2 K D FGD W, 8

$2 8D .

SD Lp g S#Af h 32 8D $2 F

5$#2 -

.' / - , C

?D$@

$*A- U 6 I c

# 5

a j 5C T gA- 5

" #e 8#B, a j

3#

[ *e ]4

=

=6

$J A0 ]^

D m0 3I gD

8 12

#2 K ,

) Pandey et al.,

.(2017

W9"

# W D

$P K8 E, 8

$ -

, - .' / 12

C 2

Echium amoenum) (

8H"

12 .TG F 8 39 8J 3I D g

2018) ., Amiri et al

F .(

)- @ S*

FN '

1D @

$"

F AH, S*

R&' 3*A' *I K8AA- g#

$"

8#; "

,

#; *, g#

$"

5 $ S*

8H"

12 5

#

$*E FD p , 8

2009) ., Iqbal et al .(

$%

"#

F4 "

F }D * FD3r"

< D K8 E, 8D $2 F-

5 *- I ,

- .' / v#" i

$!

1 W*, 6

$#! "

AH, 5 R&' U *e qD 8J

$

$&N

12 8A*

U 84) 3 .(

FGD W, S#P #,

#"

E

S#

v#" i SD$*E#

$&N 12

~ $, F

v#" i 12 58 9, -

$&N 12 ) 86 / 5

* ' ($*, FGD W, 12

58 9,

*G)2

$&N

12 ) 15 / 3

* ' ($*, . S#Af

#"

K B*' C

, - .' / 3#

E F-

$X- 8e 8W,

_$`, ,

- .' / K ) S"

( *

$&N 12 3#

C 73 / 4

* '

$*, 8

8 _$`,

, - .' / F 13 / 6

* '

$*, gD 3I .I D

U 84) 4 .(

FGD W, S#P #,

$!

1 W*, v#" i -

;6 , - .' / E F-

gD 3I

% &'

()*+, ,

- .' /

$&N 12 , "

v#" i

, FH; &, gD 3I ..I D F 5 @ F- SD$*E#

KC 8

$&N 12

$X- 8e

$ - , - .' / K ) S"

( *

~ $, F v#" i 12 58 9, - ) 11 / 6

* ' ($*, SD$* -

$&N 12

~ $, F v#" i

*G)2 ) 75 / 3

* ' ($*, .'8 8,6 F- 8e

6 / 41 8J gD 3I F*

.' U 84) 5 .(

$&N 12

F- K8AD

$&N FfA^

F#;

, 8 5 *- I O ,

D C FfA^

12 58 9, .'

)

Lebaschi et al.,

.(2011

S#Af FH; &,

5 w+E, 8D $2

$ -

, - .' /

$&N FN '

$&N 12

$&N

†$T,

8H"

12 FD p

12 58 9, 3I

D g )

Kazaz

et al., 2010

.(

?#W9"

5$PD

$ 5 12 58 9,

w+E, 8D $2

$ - 15 S"

* - ,

F K $ 40 :$2 )#-

*

$BGI 40 :$2 )#-

* O#' *p m0 gD 3I AH,

$&N 12 8D $2

12 D

$&N

$*2 3 8#; "

)

Rhamani et al.,

2013

0 .(

.) SD gD 3I ,

"

SD S#AQ F#4 "

$- F- FI

$- ,

;6 F j a m0

=]4

$*E#

$J A0 D ]^

Z' "

FED gD 3I 8

ED 8#; "

$*E#

†$

, F- SD

$, F

F a YT' gD 3I R&'

=]4 5

R&'

53*A' *I F*a '

8 , A $- 8#

†$

gD 3I 1#I $)-

†$

.D gD 3I

$&N 12

$ ) 0 12 FD p 8 a 8 )

Hati et al., 2006

.(

&

'&

"#

}D * 1J e C FD3r"

< D K

E F-

5 #"

, - .' / ON

$!

1 W*, 6

R&' U *e qD 8J

$ C KC "

12

$ FD p 12

58 9, AH, U 84)

3 .(

FGD W, S#P #, S#

v#" i C

$b SD .BJ E F-

SD$*E#

C

KC "

12

~ $, F v#" i - ) 24 / 1529 (:$2

SD$* - 6

~ $, F v#" i

*G)2 ) 11 / 994 (:$2

K ..' S#Af FGD W, S#P #,

#"

K B*' C

, - .' / 3#

E F-

gD 3I 8W,

, - .' / C KC "

12 FD p F

@ AH, 5

gD 3I .I D F 5 @ F- g#

SD$"

C KC "

12

#"

$X- 8e

$ - , - .' / K ) S"

( * F

3#, 51 / 1676 :$2 1J e 8 F- FGD W,

#"

8 8 )

$ - ,

- (.' / 38 / 1013 :$2

qD 3 F 5 / 36 8J

$*E#

U 84) 4 .(

S#Af

FGD W, S#P #,

$!

1 W*, 5 *- I ED ,C6

3#

$

C KC "

12 FD p E F- SD$*E#

C KC "

12

FD p

#"

$X- 8e

$ - ,

- .' /

v#" i - F 8W, 41 / 2051 :$2 F .' 8,6 F-

FGD W, .; e

:80 K B*' C SD - 8e 32

8J

$*E#

K .' U 84) 5 .(

* D } FH; &,

$ e

}D * FH; &,

Fatma et al.

) (2008

2

# K h r C$,

) Origanum vulgare (

Rezaee et al. (2013)

Rhamani et al.

(2013)

2 1 58 9, O

a

. .

&

( )

"#

}D * FD3r"

< D K E F-

5 *- I

, - .' / v#" i

$!

1 W*, 6 R&'

U *e qD 8J

$#! "

AH, 5

$ C qEa 12

$ FD p 8A*

U 84) 3 .(

F&

v#" i 5 ,

FH; &, 3#

FGD W, S#P #, - e

C

$#! "

AH, v#" i gD 3I

C qEa 12 FD p

F 5 @ F- SD$*E#

C qEa 12 FD p

~ $, F

v#" i 12 58 9, - ) 79 / 289 (:$2 SD$* -

6

~ $, F 12 58 9,

*G)2 C

qEa

) 46 / 137 (:$2 .

S#Af ' $

FGD W,

S#P #, 3#

K8 E, 8

F- C qEa 12 FD p

.; e K B*' C , - .' / gD 3I 8#p

$-

F 5 @ F- S#

5 #"

$ - g#

SD$"

C qEa

FD p

#"

$X- 8e ,

- .' / K ) S"

( * F 3#, 87 / 391 :$2 F .' 8,6 F- .TG F

#"

8 ) 53 / 252 (:$2 8e 5 / 35 8J

$*E#

U 84) 3

.(

FGD W, S#P #,

$!

1 W*,

, - .' / v#" i 3#

8 4 _>*a SH,

S#

5 #"

ED ,C6 F

5 @ F-

#"

K S"

* , - .' / SD$"[

8W, C qEa 12

FD p v#" i - ) 38 / 402 (:$2 1J e 8 F-

FGD W, v#" i

12 58 9,

*G)2 ) 65 / 281

(:$2 g#

C 31 8J gD 3I E U 84)

5 .(

}D * SD FH; &, }D *

Lp g

Shaalan

)

(2005

$

5

#2 K D K #' F )

Nigella sativa

(

Rezaee

et al.

) ( 2013

$ 5 12 58 9, Z, .W .

'& "# * +

}D * 1J e C FD3r"

< D K F- E

$!

, .' / - v#" i

1 W*, $!

6 R&'

U *e qD 8J

$

$ ) 0 12 KC " C AH,

U 84) 3 FGD W, .(

S#P #, S#

v#" i SD $b C

F- E .BJ ~ $, 12 KC " C $ ) 0 SD$*E#

) - v#" i F 35

/ 2319 ( * :$2 )#-

) *G)2 v#" i F ~ $, 6 SD$* - 16

/ 1317

U 84) ( * :$2 )#- 4

FGD W, .(

S#P #,

K B*' C , 3# .BJ SD $b C .' / - E

F- , _$`, 8W, $X- 8e .' / -

S" K )

) 12 KC " C $ ) 0 ( * 81

/ 3074 :$2 )#-

F- ( * FGD W,

$ - :80 #"

SD -

) 21 / 2398 ( * :$2 )#- YT'

gD 3I 40

KC " 12 C $ ) 0 58J U 84) 8D $2

4 .(

U 84 3 . }D * FD3r"

< D

$!

, - .' /

$ c BJ - B#- v#" i 5 12 58 9, .

Table 3. Results of variance analysis effect of vermicompost on quantitative and qualitative traits of Rosa damascena Mill. genotypes.

Mean of squares

Source of variatoin

df Average plant height Numbeof flower pr er plant Flower diameter Fresh weight of flower per plant Yield of dry Flowers Yield of fresh flowers Yield of dry flowers

Replication 2 1.34^ns 0.392^ns 0.00060^ns 4.12^ns 3.931^ns 12.61 ^ns 4.96 ^ns

Vermicompost 2 174.92^** 152307.24^** 1.373^** 9370.73^** 36001.43^** 2252989.43^** 196220.45^**

Genotype 3 296.6^** 262896.94^** 8.879^** 242436.17^** 19957.34^** 2223177.33^** 99058.23^**

Vermicompost×genotype 6 10.32^** 1339.94^** 0.294^** 847.58^** 196.61^** 11360.61^** 6914.38^**

Error 22 1.20 65.15 0.0041 116.91 91.24 213.24 113.89

CV (%) - 2.71 4.47 6.64 9.71 7.12 8.14 7.81

*

**

Y#"$" F :ns

c B"

AH, U *e R&' 5

1 8J T c B"

AH, .

*, **, ns: Significantly difference at 5 and 1% of probability level, and non-significantly difference, respectively.

U 84

4 . FGD W, S#P #,

$!

, - .' /

$ c BJ - B#- v#" i 5 12 58 9, .

Table 4. Mean comparison effect of vermicompost on quantitative and qualitative traits of Rosa damascena Mill.

genotypes.

Treatmentst

Average plant Height (cm) Number of flower per plant Flower diameter (cm) Fresh weight of flower per plant (g) Dry weight of flower per plant (g) Yield of fresh Flowers (kg/ha) Yield of dry Flowers (kg/ha)

Genotypes

Kashan 145.78^a 806.58^a 5.86^a 1529.24^a 289.79^a 2319.35^a 651.28^a

Semnan 139.23^b 678.25^b 5.21^b 1377.65^b 229.65^b 1953.25^b 568.22^b

Azerbaijan Garbi 131.49^c 546.25^c 4.12^c 1246.38^c 188.54^c 1684.21^c 504.25^c

Golestan 124.58^d 468.78^d 3.15^d 994.11^d 137.46^d 1317.16^d 452.23^d

Vermicompost (Ton/ha)

0 122.29^c 613.29^c 4.73^c 1013.38^c 252.51^c 2098.21^c 539.21^c

5 148.53^b 865.53^b 5.25^b 1356.94^b 315.72^b 2745.25^b 671.53^b

10 152.13^a 1005.13^a 6.13^a 1676.51^a 391.7^a 3474.81^a 918.83^a

*

$

*' ,

# P

# S 5 j$*E, _$e qD 1N 8e AH, c B"

5 R&' U *e 5 8J 8 8 .

* In each column, means with similar letters are not significantly difference at 5% probability level.

U 84 5 . FGD W, S#P #,

$!

1 W*, , .' / - v#" i

$ c BJ - B#-

" i

# v 5 ()*+, 12 8 9, 5 .

Table 5. Mean comparison of interaction effect of Vermicompost on quantitative and qualitative traits of Rosa damascena Mill. genotypes.

Genotypes Vermicompost (Ton/ha) Average plant Height (cm) Number of flower per plan Flower diameter (cm) Fresh weight of flower per plant (g) Dry weight of flower per plant (g) Yield of fresh Flowers (kg/ha) Yield of dry Flowers (kg/ha)

Kashan

0 142.78^c 823.41^c 5.53^c 1581.32^c 279.32^c 2418.31^c 643.11^c

5 149.23^b 865.17^b 5.58^b 122.94^b 335.54^b 2863.25^b 689.24^b

10 155.49^a 1008.52^a 6.12^a 2051.41^a 402.38^a 3421.18^a 983.28^a

Semnan

0 137.25^c 689.31^c 5.01^c 1491.46^c 231.28^c 2005.11^c 562.74^c

5 140.41^b 741.22^b 5.25^b 1589.33^b 298.36^b 2451.36^b 683.43^b

10 144.54^a 923.18^a 5.65^a 801.17^a 345.74^a 2854.44^a 812.54^a

Azerbaijan Garbi

0 135.71^c 501.19^c 4.14^c 1295.77^c 201.33^c 1554.36^c 501.66^c

5 138.23^b 623.48^b 4.45^b 1488.19^b 254.47^b 2018.88^b 604.33^b

10 141.53^a 756.66^a 4.75^a 1681.33^a 305.55^a 244128^a 753.63^a

Golestan

0 121.41^c 412.16^c 3.12^c 1229.52^c 185.25^c 1424.16^c 450.39^c

5 134.11^b 495.48^b 3.52^b 1351.43^b 223.38^b 1752.51^b 506.57^b

10 138.66^a 624.66^a 3.95^a 1408.67^a 281.65^a 2145.22^a 610.36^a

* , *' $

# P

# S 5 j$*E, _$e qD 1N 8e AH, c B"

5 U *e R&' 5

8J 8 8 .

* In each column, means with similar letters are not significantly difference at 5% probability level.

U 84 6 . YD $ P*GT

S#

a$

c BJ - B#- v#" i 5 ()*+, 12 58 9,

.

Table 6. Correlation coefficients between some quantitative and qualitative traits of Rosa damascena Mill. genotypes.

Yield of dry flowers Yield of fresh flowers

Dry weight of flower per plant (g) Fresh weight of flower per plant (g)

Flower Diameter (cm) Number of flowers per plan

Characteristics

1 Number of flowers per plan

1 0.94^**

Flower diameter

1 0.93^**

0.93^**

Fresh weight of flower per plant

1 0.94^**

0.94^**

0.95^**

Dry weight of flower per plant

1 0.84^**

0.84^**

0.84^**

0.90^**

Yield of fresh Flowers

1 0.96^**

0.83^**

0.82^**

0.82^**

0.95^**

Yield of dry Flowers

S#Af FGD W,

S#P #,

$!

1 W*,

, - .' / v#" i

E F-

$ qD C

v#" i gD 3I

3#, -

;6 , - .' /

$ ) 0 C

KC "

12 gD 3I .I D

; gA-

$

qD C Q v#" i

$ -

5 3#,

()*+,

, - .' / G D T F 5 @ F- v#" i -

$ ZD

$`, _ K S"

* , - .' /

81 / 3421 -

# ) :$2 C KC "

12 5 SD$*E#

3#,

$ ) 0 v#" i

*G)2 12

/ 2145 -

# ) :$2

C KC "

12 5 SD$* - 3#,

$ ) 0 8

U 84) 5 .(

$b F , 8' .)0 gD 3I

$ ) 0 C

KC "

12 v#" i - .TG F v#" i 5 ,

FH; &,

$PD F 1#;

S*

s B"

Z' *,

$*E#

c 8N 8#; "

12

$*E#

*D S*

C KC "

12

C qEa 12 q"

FD p

$*E#

SD v#" i .8

E Lp F-

F bA,

!n"

#

$ W, D

$ ()*+,

, - .' /

$ 2

# K D D 9

) Ocimum

basilicum

c J( .I$2

# 8 F- _$`, 5 S"

* , - .' / F K $ 50 8J -

#

# D 5$"$

5C C

$b

$ ) 0 K , qEa 1-

.TG F "

# 8

8 ) _$`, -

#

# D

, - .' / . (

)

et al., 2017; Anwar et al.,

2005; Rahamani et al., 2017

( }D * .

SD g Lp

}D * g Lp

Mamta et al.

(2010)

2

# K

*' D

) Stevia rebaudiana

(

Fatma et al.

) (2008

2

# K

h r C$, )

Origanum vulgare

S#Af (

Rahamani et al.

) 2013

v#" i (

5 2 1 58 9,

O a .

.

* +

"#

( )

* D } 1J e C 3r"

D F D

<

K E F-

#"

5 , - .' / v#" i

$!

1 W*, 6

R&' U *e D q 8J

$

$ ) 0 C

qEa 12

AH, U 84)

3 .(

F&

v#" i 5 ,

FH; &, 3#

FGD W, S#P #, S#

v#" i C

$b SD

.BJ E SD$*E#

$ ) 0 12 qEa

~ $, F

v#" i 12 58 9, -

C qEa 22 / 651

:$2 )#-

* SD$* - 6

~ $, F v#" i 12

58 9,

*G)2 C

qEa 23 / 452 -

# :$2 )

* U 84) 4 .(

' $ FGD W, S#P #, 3#

K8 E, 8

$ ) 0 C qEa 12 .; e K B*'

C , - .' / gD 3I 8#p

$- F 5 @ F- S#

5 #"

$ - , - .' / g#

SD$"

C qEa

FD p

#"

$X- 8e ,

- .' / K ) S"

( *

F 3#, 68 / 918 :$2 )#-

* F .' 8,6 F-

.TG F

#"

8 ) 21 / 539 :$2 )#- ( *

8e 5 / 35 8J

$*E#

. FGD W, S#P #,

$!

1 W*,

, - .' / v#" i 3#

E K8A 4 _>*a

AH, S#

5 #"

ED ,C6 F

5 @ F-

#"

K S"

* , - .' / SD$*E#

$ ) 0

C qEa 12 v#" i - ) 28 / 983 -

# :$2 )

* ( 1J e 8 F- FGD W, v#" i

12 58 9,

*G)2 ) 36 / 610 -

# :$2 )

* ( g#

C 31 8J

gD 3I E U 84) 5 .(

F )- @ v#" i .TG

F s 3#,

5 -

, '

* K B gA- 5

" B*, E

8 v#" i - /#" i

5$D]p - [

F- gD 3I 3#, -

;6

, - .' /

$ ) 0 C

$"

qEa 12 SD

v#" i

$*E#

C v#" i A ' rD l6

$^

*G)2 .TG F 8 gD 3I E .

$b F , 8'

-

;6 , - .' / F F)#' FH' "

re D FE

]4

=

$*E#

$J A0 ]^

D 3I gD 3#, 3*A' *I

Y4 , T

$ ) 0 K , qEa 12 , "

" i

# v 5 12 8 9, 5

$2 D 8 . c H; &, : r

K8

$

5 3#AE2 w+E, K8

.' F- "

# 5 - 5

U 0 K8 b

#

$ - 5

# i ; D q , - .' /

m0 3I D g s B"

C qEa SD 2

# K 8D $2

)

Bigohna et al., 2008

.(

S#Af h 32 K8

.'

% &' ()*+, ,

- .' / ,

h

$ ,

# 3 K ,

qEa , K$! , D 9 )

Ocimum basilicum

(

$! ,

.' )

Azizi et al., 2008

( W#W9" .

tW&A, 8 ,

F-

$ 5 v#" i 5 ()*+, 12 58 9, : r

8

w+E, 8D $2 SD$*E#

h 12 FD p

$ $

810

80 SD$"[

$ ) 0 12 KC "

$ $ 2465 :$2 )#-

* F .' K8,6 .' )

(Lebaschi, 2012

. F )- @

}D * g Lp

$ e }D *

c H; &,

Darzi et al.

(2016)

K #2 D T )

Dracocephalum

moldavica

( S#Af

Rahamani et al.

2013)

(

Tabaei-Aghdaei et al.

(2004) Rezai et al.

)

( 2013

$ 5 12 58 9, .W &, ..

, - + ./

0 1

}D * YD$

P*GT gD ,C6

E U 84) 6 (

F-

$ ) 0 C

12 qEa

* 12 58 9,

F&

O#W*G, D[

a$

c BJ qDi ; I ,

c BJ - KC 8 5$#2 K8 C 1#TN c BJ 8H"

12 FD p ) 95 / 0

= (r

C

$"

12 ) 96 / 0

= (r

$&N

12 ) 82 / 0

= (r

$ ) 0 C

KC "

12 FD p

) 82 / 0

= (r

..

SD }D * h 32 5 4 ,

, P*GT

$ ) 0 12 c BJ ()*+, 12

58 9, O

D ' E , 8 )

Tabaei-Aghdaei

et al., 2004

.(

Rezaee et al.

) (2013

3#

P*GT

O#W*G, D[

#, c BJ - 2 v#" i 5

12 58 9, K8 E, 8 $- 6

„ 8A*

S#

$ ) 0 12

* c BJ 8H"

12 FD p )

95 / 0

= (r

$&N d "

g p ) 91 / 0

= (r

P*GT

.TX, [

4 .

S#Af

Rhamani et al.

) (2013

3#

c H; &, 12

58 9, S#

$ ) 0 C

qEa 12

* F&

O#W*G,

D[

a$

c BJ - 12 58 9, 8A , c BJ

8H"

12 FD p ) 95 / 0

= (r

C KC "

12 ) 96 / 0

= ( r

K8 E, .8 $- }D * SD gD ,C6 }D *

' $ 5

$PD WW9, )

Jaimand et al., 2005; Kudori et al.,

2015; Kazaz et al., 2010; Lebaschi, 2012 Yousefi, 2018

( , P*GT

$ ) 0 12

BJ c ()*+, 12 8 9, 5 D 'O E , .8

2/

3 /#

4

}D * SD ' $ E F-

$ - -

;6

, - .' / Y4 , gD 3I

$ ) 0 12 c BJ

qDi ; I , KC 8

5$#2 K8 12 58 9, .TG

F

8 8 _$`, ,

- .' / .8D $2 0 :8

_$`, K

5 D # # 8•#; "

#2 D

$I 6 K 5 6

~$

)J 8#; "

c[ `9,

q# 2 H#T@

6 .' .

$ A D S F4 "

F

$ ) 0 1 N F4 "

C qEa 12 5 34 6

"#

K S"

-

;6 , - .' /

*

$b

F c> E, C

D .G 9,

#

&

C

$ -

5 -

#

# D 5 *'

# 1 F _ 8

; "

# 8 p D 8

_$`, K S"

, - .' /

* . 4 U `e

$ ) 0 1 N F4 "

12 58 9, J "

# F ,

$2 .

S#Af

•*

D } ' $

$!

5 -

()*+,

$

v#" i E C c B"

gA- v#" i .TG

F

"#

5 5 - .

F- D S

$, c H; &,

#

$*E

5 G *p

# 1

$ ) 0 Af

# S

# 5 C ]u"

D F 5

D S

" i

# v 5 $ , C ' . Af

# S F4 "

F

D * d )- C SD

$ ' 4 P*GT a$

BJ c

,

• FH; &,

$ ) 0 12 ,

"

6 [

$

$ ) 0 F, $

5 e>J L F

5 F -

$ .

$

' M 0>@

c F .' 6 8, K C D•

S C6 gD , v#" i

- 5

SD$"[

$ ) 0 12 c BJ qDi ; I ,

F-

" , 6 F A0 qD v#" i

$"$

FW&A, , FH; &, .G

v#" i

• 5 A '