D I N H D U O N G VA T H U C A N C H A N N U O I
- "^TuxV VA r S ? ^ ^T ' ' ° ' ™ ^ «C)T GUNG LEN NANG
SUAT VA CHAT Ll/ONG TRIJNG G A CONG NGHIEP
Nguyin m Kim Klmng': Pham Ngoc Du' va TrSn Homo Nl,a„' Ngay nhiar, ha, bia. 07/07/2016 - Ngay nhan b i i phan b.en: 21/07/2016
Ngay bai bao dupc chap nhan dang; 24/07/2016 TOM TAT
™ „ , . " S h * " * ' « Ih'ie Inen irin mil Iram sau ,„„„ „ „ ™ „„, * « „ , « , „ „ „ , « , - „ • • , • ra mifc bo sung boi gtms (BG) co liie 4n,t„ fA, .,t ~i,- - - ' "^ ^tan tuoi nham Itm Ibe, Ibe thue Ln loan ngSaiiMlneo'wn Zb f' ' T S ' " , f" " " ' ' " " « " ' " * " " " « ' " " ' * « ' " ' "
* 0,5% boi gimg,- va ,4, BG gom KPCs"n ^ u ' ! ^ ^ u *u' ' " ' " ' 8™K (3) BG„, gon, KPCS lap la. la 4ga mi, 'iJi.ettt^iinim^^^^^Cc^lf"^'^-"'^'^'^''"''' ' ' ? ' " ' " ' » ' » " & 'Sn bgi gimg trong khau phan ga ma, de Hi».v B,„ t t M/W/2016 Kel qua phan hch cho Ihav bo sung bolgimg ,ua cac n,Sn 6,6, cao hon „ vo, D C ^ I V T " S ^i^V \ T ' '^' " "" " " ^° ™"8 BG„. (90,5%), IhSp nhal li, DC (82%) (P<0 O s i „ , 6 ' V " " • > ' = * " " " S ' " " ^ "•> "hato BG.„ (90,7%) vi, hing) vi, BG„ (202,8 Irtng), va . h t nhS o DC 181 8 ^ l.'Wg hung il,„ d„oc/6 cao nha, o BG„ (203,3 gi, qua 3 th6,-d,em lav mlu d,o .hav S „ '^t ' " ' " <""" " * ™ * ' ' ' " ^ g h i n g cua voi DC (65,27 g/trungrNguoc a, CSI n '=,"'" ^^ " ° "*•" ° "=>• " "G..,, (69,07.68,7^,nh,i) so DC (0,422, tpJis, K I i q X h a n S f u ' ^ u ' a ' Z r H ^ H ' ° " „ ° C - " ' ^"^ " ^ ' ™ S <»•'»*•") » ™ lai h,fu qua k,„h le cao b o n ' ^ ^ o ' ^ S c ~B^G ,^8 S , * , " ! " °.=-' ' * • • " ' " ' " » = - ' * « " • ) " - " 8 0,254),50% boi gimg bo sung vao ^ a u D M „ c, •- ^'^ " ' " ' " " " ^ " ">= ' ' • "Sh, su dung qua k,nh le cho'V^f Chan nUi, "^ " ° " «= ™ ' * "'"P « , flnm nang suai Imng cua ga v. h,eu
Ti, klioa. boi gang, ty If de, khoi luon.,; inaig. ga .te ABSTRACT
Effec, of ginge, , . „ , p „ „ , „ suppU„en,aH„n on production perfo™a„ce and egg quality
of laying hens BBH^-^ity T l , • ^[-i'-ycn Th, Kuu KJiang. Pham Ngoc Du and Tran Hoan? \'ha„
diet supplemented ivith 0 25% CRP (31 BG ,™. , t I , j """"'^''' ^'^'^"" the basa]
BC,, was the basa, d,.t s u p p l e m e ' S ™ ^ ; ' ™ % J ^ l t S £ ^ ^ ^ ^
which 4 bens per cage The resulls showed , b , „ ! „ A I , , ^ heahnenl ,vas len rep,,cahons Ihe hna, body'^-e.gh't „, b e ' a l e r a g e T g g w Z an":;',*? " " " " """""^ ' - a n n e n i . v e r e on highest egg rat. percentage and l o l a T e S ' n Z t ' ™ r e " ' B G " " ™ - " ' • ° " ^ ' ' ' ' ' " " - « ' • »><^
(90.5% and 202.8 eggs), and l o , v e s l » . a s o n \ „ „ h o % 2 r ^ d , l k » ? s ' ' f"'' '"" " = » ' coOecBon hmes showed thai there ,vas sientficanOv H ff " , ' * ^ ' ' "ES^' ™= ^S8S qoabh- of the three highest on BG. and BG (69T7 ffl 7 1 ^ ^ ] ' ° " " « « ™ 8 h t among treabnents, which egg yolk .ndeC^vas on d ^ S w Z r d t „ S T J " ' ' T " r ° ! , i S ' ' ^''<^> ""''"''^ " " - « sh„w,ed thai BG,,andBG.,g,ven t h e m „ s , e ? o ™ ™ ^ , « r 4 S " ? - ' ^ " * ' ' ' ' ^ ' '"•""•"•' " " ' > • « ' (-18 89%). F,om"U,ese results suggested l ^ a ' T e o o n m , , ! . ' " ? ' ' ' ' " ' ' ° ™ ' ' ° ' - " ' ' " ^ - ^ 0 . 5 0 % ) m , g b t , m p r o v e p r o d u c 6 „ ^ e j r a : f e ; i C n r b e S T c o ™ l T ™ ' ^ - " " ' ° ' ^ ^
' f ' y ' " " * , ginger ,„„, , , „ , , f e ,j.j „ „ , p„„„„g, ..^j ,„,,j|,, ,,_,„^
' Truimg Dgi hi,x: C i n Thu
•Tac , . a d^ h^^ h^ TS N g u y ^ 771, Kim Khan^ Bp n
hpi Can rho TP Can Tho D i ^ thoai. 0939 205 355. E la \ o n g nf^hiep ^ a Sinh h,x ung liu. :mgDa,
KHKTChan nudi .fo 213 - thdng 11 nam 2016
DINH P l J d N G VA THtfC A N CHAN N U 6 l
I.OATVANfii
Gu:-ig thuoc h p Zingibci.iceac ten klioa hoc ]a Zingiber oficmalc Rose co n g u o n goc tu Dong N a m A, An Do, Jamaica, Trung Quoc, Srilanka, Malaysia, Indonesia, N h a t Ban va mot so n u d c khac a i a p h u o n g Tay d i n g trong nhieu gimg. Cac hoat dia't co trong a i g i m g gom oleoresins, beo, carbohydrate, vitamin, khoang va cac e n z y m e p h a n giai protein tiem n a n g la zingibain (Shukla va Singh, 2007).
Gimg tho chlia deh 9% lipid hav glycolipid va khoang 5-8% oieoresin voi 2 n h o m hoa hoc khac bi^t n h a u la n h o m bay hoi va kiiong bay hoi tao thanii phan cav a i a g i m g (Chrubasik va ctv, 2005, Shukla v^ Singh, 2007). Cac nha nghien cuu da chiing minh giing co tac d u n g khang khuan, tang siic d e khang, han che mpt so benh tat tren n g u a i va ca 6 d p n g vat {Shukla va Singh, 2007)
Trong chan nuoi gia cam, Heravvati (2010) da tim thay su d u n g 2% g i m g trong kliau phan cua g.H thit, TTTA, HSCHTA cua ga cao hon, O n u (2010) bao cao riing bo sung 0,25'Xi gimg vao khau phan co so a ga thit cai thien d u o c HSCHTA mat dij TTTA khong thay doi.
Tren ga de, co rat it cong trinh nghien ciiii ve v\^c bo sung bpt g i m g vao kliau phan an cua ga de t h u o n g p h a m
Chinh VI v^y de tai "Anh huvug cua bo sung boi giiiig len ndng sudt vd chat Immg trtmg cua gd dc thinmg phdm Hiscr Brown" giai doan 63-70 tvian tuoi dupc tliuc hien nliam xac dinh tv le bot giing toi LiTJ nlia't trong khau phan \'a mang lai hieu qua kinh tecao nhat cho nguoi chan nuoi, 2. VAT LI|U VA PHUONG PHAP NGHIEN cilu 2.1. Vat li?u thi n g h i ? m
Bot g i m g s u d u n g trong thi nghiem o d a n g bgt min, co mau vang tuai va co mui thom. Gimg d u p c mua duoi dang che bien san {Cong ty Viet An), d u p c d o n g goi va bao quan o noi kho rao, thoang mat trong suot qua trinh tien hanh thi nghiem,
2.2. Doi t u g n g n g h i e n cim
Mot tram sau muoi ga de chuyen triing giong Hise\ Brown, d u o c khao sat tu tuan
moi 63 d e n t u a n tuoi 70 (khoi l u p n g 1,89-1,92 kg/mai).
2.3. Bo tri thi n g h i e m
Thi nghiam d u p c bo' tri theo the thuc h o a n toan n g a u nhien voi 4 n g h i e m thuc (NT) n r o n g irng voi 4 k h a u p h a n (co hoac khong co) bo s u n g bpt gimg:
Doi chting (DC): ga chi d u p c an khau p h a n CO so (KPCS);
BG,_„ gom KPCS + 250 m g bpt gimg/kg TA BN,^, gom KPCS + 500 m g bpt gimg/kg TA BN-.-,, g o m KPCS + 750 m g bpt gimg/kg TA Thi nghiem d u g c lap lai 10 ian (4 con/Ian), moi N T 40 con, tong so ga du'gc nuoi TN 160 con.
T h u c an d o cong ty Emivest san xuat danh cho ga d e tu'ong i m g vdi n a n g l u p n g trao doi (NLTD) va protein tho (CP) ian lupt la 2700 kcal va 16,5% CP.
2.4. C h a m soc n u o i d u o n g va g h i n h ^ n so li^u Ga d u p c nhot tren long cd kich thudc 40 X 40 X 40 cm, moi long 4 ga mai de. Vdi h?
thdng chuong kin, ga d u g c cham sdc va nucii d u d n g trong ciing che'dp va d u p c chiing ngira cac lo^i vaccin dich ta, g u m b o r o , dau, ciim gia cam ciing n h u tay ky sinh triing day dii.
Ga d u p c an 2 lan/ngay (7 gid sang va 4 gid chieu), d u g c u o n g n u d c t y do. Lupng TA cho an va TA thira d u p c can h a n g ngay. Che d d chieu sang 18L:6D. M a n g an va mang uong d u o c ve sinh mdi ngay. T n i n g d u p c thu lirgm va can 1 !an/ngay v a o liic 4 gid 30 chieu.
M a u t r u n g d u a c lay thanii 3 dpt: d tuan 63, tuan 67 va tuan 70. Moi dgt chpn nglu nhien 10 t r i m g / N T d e kiem tra chat lupng trung, Tdng so t r u n g d u p c p h a n ti'ch la 120 qua trung.
2.5. Cac chi tieu t h e o d o i
Khoi l u o n g (KL) ga dau ky va cud'i ky, n a n g suat t r u n g (NST), ty le d e (TLD), hi?u qua s d d u n g t h u c an (HQSDTA), KL tning;
cac chi tieu ve cha't l u o n g triing n h u KL, chi so hinh d a n g (CSHD), chi sd long dd (CSLD), chl sd Idng tr5ng (CSLT), d o n vi Haugh, mau sac long d o (MLD) va hi?u qua kinh te
KHKT Chdn mini KO 213 - ihon^ II ndm 2016
D I N H D I T O N G V A T H t r c A N P H A M MTTOT
2.6. Dja diem v i thdi gian nghiSn ciiu TW nghiem d u o c Hen h i n h tai trai oi H o a n g Diem, a p Phu Tho, xa Tan Phu, h u v m Tam Binh, t h a n h ph6' VTnh Long, tii OS/02/70] 6 den 04/04/2016.
2.7. Xii ly so lieu
S6' lieu thu t h a p d u o c xu lv so b o b a n e c h u o n g trinh Excel va m 5 hinh One w a ? tactor, Mmitab 16, su sai khac giiia c i c nghiem Ihuc d u o c p h a n tich bang p h e p thu Tukev o m u c 5%.
i-tfniuiMnaguuiii
Ket qua ghi n h a n ve n a n g suat sinh san cua gil Hisex Brow-n d u o c the hien o Bang 1 cho thay k h o n g co su khac biet co y nghia t h o n g ke vi KL ga d i u ky > a KL ga cu6i ki- thi nghiem giiia c i c NT '(P>0,05). T u o n g lu, KL h r m g ga va hieu qua su d u n g thiic an (TIQSDrA) cua ga giiia cac . \ T k h o n g khac biet nhau vS m a t thoiig ke (P>0,05). Su k h i c biet n h a u ve m a t thong ke giiia cac NT \-e t\- le d e taing binh (TLD TB) v i t6ng n a n g s u i t trimg (XST, (P<0,05,, h-ong d o cao n h a t l i o BG,.,. va^BG-j voi TLD TB n a m trong k h o a n g 90,i^90,/°. va t6ng NST 202,8-203,3 h i i n g / o ; t h a p nhat ,a D C (S2°. TLD t n i n g binh v i 183,8 triing/6,.
3.1. Anh h u o n g cua bgt g t m g len nang suat sinh san ciia dan ga thi nghiem
- ° ^ ! ; ? i ± ; i ! : ' ' ! ! ' i ! ' l ^ l ! > : : S b ^ ^ nia g i ( & . , Brown (M±SDI
III In nian\-
T,>b 1 w ,.: ^ C - , (69,0,g, v a B G , , (68,7g,, k e d e h l i B G I u biing 2 cho thay CO su k h i c b l e u e K L <66.33g, va t h i p n h i t la DC (P<0 051 Tv t m n g cua ga giiia cic NT (P<0,05,, trong d o long tiang, long d o va t,- le vo trung kh6nR co cac NT CO bo sung bot g u n g CO KL t n i n g cao su khac biet giiia cic NT (P>0,05)
Bing 2. Anh huong n i ^ b S s u j ^ g M g i n ^ g l e ^ f , ,„^^g ^ ^ ^ Hisex Brown Chl tieu
Ci.i In mang Ci
\ e m i u sac c-ua long d o m m g cua ga o cic NT bd s u n g bot g u n g co khuCnh hucmg sam mau h o n (8,33 - 9,13, so \ oi DC (S 27,
tuv nhien su khac biet nay khdng co ^• nghia thong ke (P>0,05, T u o n g hi, chl so hinh d i n g ICbHD) c-ua t n m g ga th, ngh.em k h i c biet
KHKTChan nuoi so 213 - ihang II nam 20/6
D I N H D L f c n V G V A T H L T C A N C H A N N U ^
khdng cd y nghia thd'ng ke giua cac NT vdi gia tri nSm trong khoang 77,05-78,80 (P>0,05).
Ke't qua ghi nhan ve chi so long trang dac (CSLTD) va d o n vi H a u g h d trung ga giiia cac NT khdng cd y nghia tho'ng ke (P>0,05), trong d d CSLTD la 0,066-0,076 va d o n vi H a u g h la 89,34-89,60.
Su khac biet giiia cac NT ve chi so long do Bang 3. Lgi n h a a n kinh te khi bo sung
(CSLD) t r u n g (P<0,05) cao nha't d D C (0,4221 giam d a n d cac N T cd b d s u n g bgt g u n g , vfi BGjyn la 0,41; BG^^^, la 0,404 va tha'p nha't d BGj^
(0,38).
3.3. H i ? u q u a k i n h te k h i b o s u n g b ^ t gwi^
trong k h a u p h a n a n cua ga d e Hisex Brownr Gia ca c u n g n h u lgi n h u a n kinli tecua dan ga thi n g h i e m diroc trinh bay d Bang 3.
bpt girng trong k h a u p h a n ga Hisex Brown Nghiem itiiic
So ngav thi nghiem, n^av So'ga thi n s h i # m . con Tien 1kg thiic a n T N , d o n g Tieu lon thiic a n loan kv, kg T o n g chl p h i t h u c an, d o n g Ty le d e , % T o n g s o t n i n g toan kv, q u a T o n g tien b a n t r u n g , d o n g C h e n h l^ch t h u chi, dcing H i e u q u a k i n h te^ "/v
DC 56 40 9-600 264,320 2.537 472
82,10 1838 2.757 000
219 528 100,00
BG„„
56 40 9.955 264 460 2 632.699
90.54 2 028 3 042 000
409 301 186,45
B G , ^ 56 40 10310 264 600 2,728.026 90,76 2 033 3 049 000
320.974 146,21
BG™, 56 40 , 10.665 264 740 2.823 452 89,33 2 001 3 001,500
178.048 81,11 Ciii Inhlg: 1 50Q ilUng/lning; Gid bot gimg, 14.200 dong/lOOg; Gid thiec an co so: 9 600/ kg
Qua bang 3 cho tha'y chi phi thiic an cao nha't la BG-„,, (2.823.452 ddng) va tliap nha't la DC (2 537 472 dong). Tdng tien ban tning cao nhat a BG^^, (3.049 000 dong), ke deh la BG^^^
(3.042.000 ddng), BG,^ (3.001.SOOdong) va thap nha't o DC (2.757.00 dong). N h u vay, hieu qua kinh te d u a vao phan chenh lech giiia thu va chi cho thay BG^^, cao nha't (86,45%), ke den la BG-^, (46,21%) so vdi DC, trong klii dd BG--^ cd hi^u qua kinh te'(-18,897o) thap h a n so v d i D C
4.THAOLUAN
Gimg, mdt ioai thao d u p c vdi nhieu hoat chat sinh hoc, trong chan nudi gia cam, cac nghien cuu da chung minh anh hudng cd loi cua giing len nang suat sinh truong, cai thien d u o c sue klioe cung n h u chat lu^ng san p h a m cda ga thit (Ah va ctv, 2008; N g u y i n Thi Kim
ga mai khdng khac biet nhau giCra NT co b6 s u n g bpt g i m g 0,5% trong khau p h a n ga mii d e Hisex giai d o ^ n 30-37 hian tuoi, trong khi NT bd s u n g 1,5% bpt g i m g lam giam KL ciia ga Ben canh dd, cac ke't qua nghien a i u cua Akbarian va ctv (2011); Z h a o va ctv (2011) va Malekizadeh va ctv (2012) d e u k h d n g tim thay s v sai khac n h a u v e khdi l u g n g t n i n g giiia NT cd va k h o n g cd bo s u n g BG trong khau phm cua ga mai de, m a c dii d cac NT cd bo sung cd KL t r u n g cao hon. Ve hieu qua sir d u n g fliih an ciia ga trong nghien cii-u a i a Akbarian va ctv (2011), Z h a o va ctv (2011), Malekizadeh va ctv (2012) va Z o m r a w i va ctv (2014) cijng cho rang bd s u n g BG k h d n g anh h u d n g den hi§u qua sii d u n g thiic an ciia ga de,
BG giup cai thien su tie't cac enzyme tieu vu • , j . -inir, ,^- . " - • hda va s u khang oxy hda (Malekizadeh va ctv, Khang va ctv, 2015) Ke. qua phan Hch ve nang 2012), k h f a g k h u f a va m j t so hoat dtjng k h i suat smh san cua gaHtsex Brown giai doan 63 lam tfag tiffa h o f a m f a va lam giam s „ oxf den 70 luan tuo, cho thay bo sung bijt gimg hoa trong thuc fa (Ali va ctv, 2008, IncharOT trong khau phan khong anh h u i n g den KL va Yamauchi, 2009; Zhao va ctv, 2011) gitjp cho
^ ° T',^\ ? r "'"'• " * ' " ^ " ""^ " " Zomrawi ga co n f a g surt tning tot hon so voi D C Tj va ctv (2014) n m g ket lufa hrong tu rfag KL le d e ciia ga 6 B G ^ va B G „ cao hon 8,5-8,7*
9 213 • thanr, II n/j,m 20H
» (
P I N H D l / O N G V A T H L r c AN? C H A M MTTOT^^ so VCQ D C (Bang 1), cho thay r ^ g bo sung BG iV; ^ ° " S ' ^ ^ " P^^ giup cai thien va n a n g cao tv le d e cda ga. Akbarian va ctv (2011) da c h u n g minh s u tang t y l e d e a i a gala d o bdt gimg Iam W: tang kha nang k h a n g oxy hda d ga gnip chdng
<Bf. lai cac goc t u d o san sinh trong co the va lam [;. giam ndng dp MDA (Malondialdehyde), mdt I] san p h a m oxy hda lipid noi sinh, so vdi DC va Kl ket qua la bd sung 0,5% hoac 0,75% BG trong - khau phan cua ga mai de Hy-Line 30 tuan tudi - CO ty Ie de chiein 90,05-91,72% cao h o n so DC r (85,08%) trong khi bd sung 0,25% bdt gimg ty Ie
^ d e chi dat 87,83%. Nghien ciiu a i a Malekizadeh
^- va ctv (2012) cho rang bd sung 1% bot gimg lam
^ tang nang sua't tning. N g u p c laj, Zomrawi va
^ ct%'j2014) bao cao rang bd sung BG trong khau
^ phan khdng anh h u d n g deh ty Ie de a i a ga
^ Hif»x giai doan 30-37 tuan tudi, ma chung cd r khuynh h u d n g giam o cac m d c bd sung (68,7- _ 72,5%) so vdi DC (73,9%). Ket qua nghien a i u
cua Zhao va ct\- (2011) cho rSng sd d u n g 5-20g bdt^ gung/kg thuc an oja ga Hy-Line Brown ,: khdng anh h u o n g den ty 1? d e cua ga.
' Ke't qua p h a n Hch chat l u p n g trung ga thi
••' nghiem cho tha'y bd sung BG cd anh h u o n g ' tich cue d e n KL triing cua ga, dac biet la BG^^,
" ^^ ^^rs,, (Bang 2); t u o n g hi' ket qua nghie^n Cliu cda A h m e d va ctv (2014), va EI-Galil va : M a h m o u d (2015). N g u o c Iai, Akbarian va ctA' : (2011), Z h a o va ctv (2011); Malekizadeh va ctv (2012) va Z o m r a w i va ctv (2014) d e u khdng tim tha'y s u khac biet ve KL triing giua cac NT.
Ben canh dd, cac ke't qua ve cac thanii phan Clia hiing, mau idng do, CSHD, CSLTD va don vi H a u g h ciia ga tlii nghiem cung gid'ng vdi ke't qua nghien ciiu o i a Akbarian va ctv (2011).
Ke't qua o Bang 2 cung cho thay cd tuong quan nghich giua CSLD va nnic bd sung BG trong khau phan, s u giam dan CSLD theo m u c bd sung bdt gimg tang dan, deu nay cd the la d o s u hi^n dien cua cac cha't chong oxy hda o i a g i m g hi^n dien o Idng d o nlueu h o n va cd the Iam cho ca'u tnic cua Idng do bJ be va tha'p hon so vol DC.
Hieu qua kmh te o BG^^, va BG^^,cao hon 86,45-46,21";. so vdi DC, su khac biet nay la d o
SU' tang s d l u p n g t n i n g cua ga o cac NT nay nen so'hen thu d u a c hi ban trung ciing cao hon.
5.K^UfAN
Bd sung 0,25-0,5% bdt g i m g vao khau p h a n an cai thien d u p c t)' le de, n a n g sua't t n i n g va khdi l u o n g hTing cua ga d e Hisex Brown giai d o a n 63-70 t u a n Uidi, d o n g tlidi n a n g cao hieu qua kinh te'cho nha chan nudi.
LOU C A M ON
Tac gia xin chan thanh cam o n s u giiip d o a i a anh Le Thanh P h u o n g , em Tuan, em P f i o J i g j a em Ai, cdng ty Emi\-est da hd tro viec h-ien khai thi nghiem tai trai d u p c td't d^p.
TAI Llfu THAM KHAO
Ahmed A . A , Zaed J S. and Shlimoon H.J. (2014), AnliOMdant achVLli resultant from adding gmger and celen seeds to broiler breeder diets and its retloctioii on fertililv, hatchabihu and « eight of chicks, Anbar J Agnc Sci, 12.2Ci4-?92
Akbarian A., Abolghasem C , Ahmadi S. and Hossein M. (2011), Effects of gmger root {Zmvilicr affiamk) on egg yolk cholesterol, antiovidant slahjs and performance ot la\nnghens, J Applied Amm S a , 3 9 19-21, Ail B.H.. Blunden G., Tanira M.O. and Nemmar A.
(2008), Some phylochemical, pharmacological and tox.cological properties ol gmger [Zingiber officmak Roscoe) A reMcu ol recem research,>ood Chem To\icol,46 409-420
Chrubasik S , Pittler M H. and Roufogalis B D, (2(HI5), /Liiigih-nf rhizo'iia A comprehensive review on the ginger effect and efficac) prohles, Phytomediane. 12 f)84-70!
El-Galil K A . and Mahmoud H.A. (2015), Effect
"1 Gmger Roots Meal as Feed Additives in Laymg Japanese (Juail Diets. J Amencan Sa , 11 164-173 "
Herawafi O. (2010), Tlie effecl of feeding red gmger .is phytobiohc on bod\ weight gam, feed conversion and inlemalorganscondilionof broiler, Int J Poult Sci 9 Incharoen T and Yamauchi K. (2009), Production performance, egg quality and mlestmal histolog\' m laying hens led dielar>- dned lermented gmger. Inl | Pouli SCI.. 8 107S-1085
Malekizadeh M . M o e i n i M.M and Chazi S.H 120P) The Etfecb ot Differenl LeNels of Ginger {luniil'er cifficiiiiiU Rose) and Turmenc (Ciir<.iimii luin;a linn) Rhi7omes P o n d e r on Some Blood Melaboiiles and Production Performance Characlenslics of Laymg Hens, J ,\gr Sci Tech . 14 127-114
Nguyin Thi Kim Khang, Ngo M m h Suong, Phan Thi Thuy Duy. Le Thanh P h u o n g va N g u y i n Nhtrt Xuan Dung ,2015, Anh hu,mg a i a bo sung b^t gung vao KHKTChin n ' o ' l " ! " ' ' ™ " ' ' ' ^"' ^ ' ~ ' " ™ '
KHKT Chdn nudi .w 213 - ihdng 11 nam 2016
DINH DlfONG VA THifC AN CHAN NU6r
10. Onu P.N. (2010). Evaluation of hi o herbal spices as feed offii-iiiali:) on laymg performance and anhoiidani status additiies for finisher broilers, Biotechnologv in Animal of la\'ing hens nnd on dietan- oxidation stability, J, Husbandry, 26 383-392 "" Poult Sci„ 90:1720-1727
11. Shukla Y. and Singh M. (2007), Cancer Preventive u . Zomrawi W.B., Abdel-Atti K J V . , Dousa BM,, Properties ot Gmger: A Bnef Re\-ieu, Food Chem M o h a m m e d K.E., MahaJa A.G. and Elamin KM.
Toiicol„45:683-*90 [2014). The effectofdietar\'ginger root powder(2in^]Kr Li. Zhao XZ..Yang B., Yang W.R., Wang Y., Jiang S.Z.. i#\-i'jnJp) on yolk cholesterol and egg characteristic, InL
Zhang G.G. (2011). Effects of ginger root [Zmgilvr J Livestock Research. 4 42-i7
ANH Hl/dNG CUA VIEC BO SUNG YUCCA SCHIDIGERA LEN NANG SUAT SINH SAN CUA GA NOI
Nguyen Tin Kim Kliniig'', Nguyen Trong Ngir', Chiiu Thauh Vii'. NgiitiHii Cong Danh' va Nguyin Ngoc Han' Ngay nhan bai bao: 10/07/2016 - Ngay nhan bai phan bien: 23/07/2016
Ngay bai bao duoc chap nhan dang 25/07/2016 TOM T A T
Thi ngiuem nham khao sat anh huong cua viec bo sung Yucca schidigera ien nang suat sinh san ciia ga Noi giai doan 72-79 tuan tuoi, Tong so' 32 ga Noi de dugc bo tri hoan toan ngau nhien voi 4 nghiem thiic (NT) hrong iing vol 4 khau phan nhu sau: doi chiing (DC) chi gom khau phiin co so (KPCS); 50YC gom KPCS v.i 50 mg Yucca/kg thiic an (TA); 75YC gom KPCS va 75 mg Yucca/kg TA va lOOVC gom KPCS va 100 mg Yucca/kg TA, thi nghiem dupc lap lai 4 lan, m6i lan lap lai la 2 ga mai de Thi nghiem nuoi duong dupc thyc hien tai ap Thuan Tieh B, Thuan An, Binh Minli, Vinh Long, tir ngay 09/09/2014 deh ngay 04/11/2014. Ket qua phan h'ch cho tha'y nang su.Tt tning v,i ty le de cila ga Noi 6 cac NT co bo' sung Yucca cao hon co y nghia tliohg ke so viii DC (P<0,05) Tieu ton thiic an (TTTA) cila ga giua cac NT khac biet CO y nghia thong ke vol TTTA cao nh.i't o 50YC (93,19 g/m,ii/ngay) va tha'p nhat la DC (8003 g/mai/ngay) va lOOYC (80,04 g/mai/ngay) (P<0,05). Bo sung Yucca trong kliau phiin khong anh huong den khoi luvng (KL) cuoi ki cua ga Noi v.i cac chi tieu ve chiii luong hiing (P>0,OS), ngoai hit dp diiy vo hung cao nhat 6 75YC (0,37 mm) va thii'p nh.il o lOOYC (0,32 mm) (P>0,05). Til cac kel qua hen cho thay bo sung Yucca vao khau phan cua ga Noi gnip cai thien nang suat taing vil ty If de cua gii Noi.
Tirichda: IKII Yueea seludigeta. hi le de. get Np/
ABSTRACT
Effect of Yiieca schidigera supplementation on reproduction perforaiance of Noi laying hens Ns,,i,iv, Tin Kim Kliang. Ns»ym Troiig Ng,,, Chau Thanh Vu. Ng,iyc„ Cong D«„ft„,„l xu . . . Nguyen Ngoe Hau This expenment was earned out to evaluate the effect of Yucca supplementation mto dietary on reproduction performance of Noi laying hens trom 72 to 79 weeks of age 32 Noi laymg hens were completely randomized design mto 4 dietary treamients which consisted of a standard layer feed as a conhol diet and the other t h r » levels ol Yucca supplemented at 50,75 and 75 mgftg feed. Each dietan.
STre^i^t th H * ? " ' " ? " ' " • ™ ' " " * " "••'""-""'• "'">' " " * ' ° " " . Vinh Long province.
^erlTll^eZVt ' ! ! P " ' ° ™ " " " " " ' " ' " " ' ^ " " " ™ ° ' ''>""S hens supplemented w * Yucca u ere sig^ihcantly higher than control (PO.05) There was different sigraflcance among treamients on daily feed consumption which hiehest was 50Vr ,91 19 ../I, /j , j , <;"i"o"g'leduiieiiisoii hen/davl and innvr ,«n o a, , j , , ^ f ' g/hen/day and lowest was control (80.03 g/
n o X c , on h „ T h ^ ' ^ ' " ' ^i'' " ^ * ° ' ' ' *•""" "'••''•«"-" '"•PPfementahon to hens' die ary had on 75YC m 7 r i ^ l ' Z7 "" " ' ',^'J^S quality parameters, except the shell thickness was h/ghest to, y I c . S r ' ° " ™ ^ f ' ° ' ' ^ •""•' " ' " ' ' ° = ' ' ' ^ '"''"' fr™ "hfa Bhidy IndiLed that y,,c™ sthidigera supplementahon to diet improved egg performance and laymg rate of Noi hens.
Keywords. Yucca sclndigera pmi*r, laying rale, No, hens ' Tniong Dal hyc Can Tho
'T.I.-sia tie hen tie T5. Nguvin Thi KiniKhanB B d m 6 n r h s n n , . a t-i. KT-
hoc Cin TTio TP Cin Tho Dijn thoj, M.,9 205 3 5 i Em.,1 n f t k h " ° g , S „ ° " d „ ° ™ " " '' " " " " '"^ ' ' " " ' ^ ' ' ' " " * ^
KHKT Chan nuoi so 213 - Ihdne 11 nam 2016
