• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Directory UMM :Data Elmu:jurnal:B:Brain Research:Vol879.Issue1-2.2000:

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Directory UMM :Data Elmu:jurnal:B:Brain Research:Vol879.Issue1-2.2000:"

Copied!
10
0
0

Teks penuh

Loading

Gambar

Fig. 1. Frontal section through the dorsal hippocampus of mice including the area, in which histophotometric measurements were carried out, are presentedin Fig
Table 1Data on the number of calbindin-IR neurons (
Fig. 2. Photomicrographs of calbindin D28k-IR in the hippocampus of control and ethanol treated mice
Fig. 3. Photomicrographs of GFAP-IR in the dorsal hippocampus of control animals with normal stained astrocytes (A, C, G) and experimental groups (B,D, H)
+2

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

We have observed that (1) ¯ow can drop substantially following the formation of an upstream queue; (2) the discharge ¯ows in active bottlenecks exhibit near-stationary patterns

The finding that the estimate on an associate’s degree does not decrease while the estimates on the other credentials do decrease with the inclusion of ability is consistent with

This paper presents quantitative estimates of the effects of technological change and changes in sectoral employment on skill composition in the United Kingdom for six skill groups,

In the absence of pollution haven and three-country effects that reverse natural comparative advantage, environmental taxes decrease (increase) the volume of trade between any

However, when the stabili- cat PG superfused in vitro produces a specific activation of ty of recordings allowed the exposure of the cell to a those neurons projecting through

ing the behavioral differences between adults and adoles- The apparent lack of effect of adolescent nicotine cents given nicotine, it should be emphasized that whereas exposure on

As shown previously in this lab, 2 g / kg group difference between the Grid 1 and Grid 2 sub- ethanol is a sub-threshold dose for conditioning place groups, mice receiving ethanol

In the caudate, two-factor ANOVA indicates no age-dependent difference for the increase of dopamine turnover after MDMA (no interaction of treatment 3 age) but the decrease in