• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

A correlation between the mastery of english complex Sentences and the reading comprehension achievement Of second semester pharmacy students of widya mandala Catholic university 1987,1988 CASE STUDY - Widya Mandala Catholic University Surabaya Repository

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2019

Membagikan "A correlation between the mastery of english complex Sentences and the reading comprehension achievement Of second semester pharmacy students of widya mandala Catholic university 1987,1988 CASE STUDY - Widya Mandala Catholic University Surabaya Repository"

Copied!
12
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

A CORRELATION BETWEEN

THE MASTERY OF EWGLISH COMPLEX

SENTENCES

AND

THE READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT

OF

SECOND SEMESTER PHARMhCY STUDENTS OF

WIDPA

MANDALA

CATHOLIC UWIVERSITY 1987,1988

CASE

STUDY

A

THESIS

Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Sarjana Pendidikan Degree in

English Language Teaching

-

' h i

-

! :.&

---- I._- L

;-*t<LL

\

Sef

yawafi

1_

1

-IG 121 3083075

Universitas Katolik Widya Mandala Surabava

n

Fakultas Keguruan dan llmu Pendidikan Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa lnggris

(2)

APPROVAL SHEET

T h i s t h e s i s e n t i t l e d A CORRELATION BETWEEN THE

MASTERY OF ENGLISH COMPLEX SENTENCES AND T

H

E

R

EAD

I

NG

COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT OF SECOND SEMESTER PHAREACY

STUDENTS OF WIDYA MANDALA CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY 1987/1988

and p r e p a r e d a n d s u b m i t t e d by S e t y a w a t i

h a s been a p p r o v e d and a c c e p t e d as p a r t i a l f u l f i l m e n t o f

t h e r e q u i r e m e n t s for t h e S a r j a n a P e n d i d i k a n d e g r e e i n

E n g l i s h Language T e a c h i n g by t h e f o l l o w i n g a d v i s o r s .

DR. -1k0

-

F i r s t A d v i s o r

Dra. S u s a n a ~ e o p l l u s

(3)

APPROVAL

SHEET

T h i s t h e s i s h a s been examined by t h e Committee

on O r a l Examination with a g r a d e o f B

on November

5,

1988

/' Chairman

i

Dka.

Magdalena I. K a r t i o

Member Member

Dra.

f i t i

Mina

Tamah

Member

Dean o f

t h e Teacher T r a i n i n g

Member

Approved by .-

L .-

DR. Wuri Soedjatmiko --.--.-.

Head o f

t h e English Department

(4)

ACKNOWLDGEMENTS

I would l i k e t o p r a i s e and thank God f o r H i s g r e a t

s u p p o r t and guidance i n accomplishing t h i s t h e s i s . I

b e l i e v e t h a t without H i s g r e a t h e l p , I cannot accomplish

my t h e s i s ori schedule.

I a l s o d e e p l y e x p r e s s my s i n c e r e t h a n k s t o

D r . Wuri Soedjatmiko, my f i r s t a d v i s o r , and Dra. Susanna

T e o p i l u s , my second a d v i s o r , f o r t h e i r p a t i e n t guidance

and t h e i r v a l u a b l e s u g g e s t i o n i n w r i t i n g t h i s t h e s i s

.

F i n a l l y , I a l s o f e e l very much i n d e b t e d t o t h e

f o l l o w i n g :

1. D r s . Suwandhi Widjaja, t h e Dean o f Pharmacy F a c u l t y o f

Widya Mandala C a t h o l i c U n i v e r s i t y Surabaya, f o r h i s

p e r m i s s i o n t o a d m i n i s t e r some t e s t s t o t h e second

s e m e s t e r s t u d e n t s o f Pharmacy F a c u l t y .

2. D r s . A . G u r i t o , t h e E n g l i s h l e c t u r e r o f t h e second

s e m e s t e r Pharmacy F a c u l t y , f o r h i s b e n e f i c i a l s u g g e s t i o n

zbout t h e E n g l i s h Teaching i n Pharmacy F a c u l t y .

3 . D r s . Nyoman Arcana; who g i v e s me much h e l p i n f i n i s h i n g

t h e s t a t i s t i c a l c a l c u l a t i o n o f t h i s t h e s i s .

4. D r a . S r i Soenaring A s t o e t i , who h e l p s me i n s c o r i n g

t h e e s s a y t e s t i t e m s .

5.

A l l of t h e second s e m e s t e r Pharmacy s t u d e n t s of Widya
(5)

y e a r o f 1987/1388, f o r t h e i r w i l l i n g n e s s and p a r t i c i p a -

t i o n i n doihg t h e t e s t s .

6. A l l o f t h e l e c t u r e r s of E n g l i s h Department o f Widya

Plandala C a t h o l i c U n i v e r s i t y

,

who have p a t i e n t l y

guided and a d v i s e d me d u r i n g my s t u d y i n t h i s

Department.

Without t n e i r kind h e l p , I am s u r e t h a t I cannot

accomplish t h i s t h e s i s even l e s s s a t i e f a c t o r i l y .

(6)

TABLE OF CONTENT

Acknowledgement i v

T a b l e o f C o n t e n t v i

T a b l e l i s t i x

A b s t r a c t x i

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION

1 . 1 . Background o f The Problem 1

1.2. The A i m o f The S t u d y 5

1.3. The S i g n i f i c a n c e o f The S t u d y 5

1.4. L i m i t a t i o n o f The S t u d y and Some

D e f i n i t i o n o f Key Terms 6

1 . 5 . Problem S t a t e m e n t 9

1.6. Fundamental Assumption 9

1.7. H y p o t h e s e s 10

1 . 8 , O r g a n i z a t i o n o f t h e T h e s i s 11

CHAPTER

I1

REVIEW

OF THE RELATEn LITERATURE 13

2.1. Review o f The R e l a t e d S t u d y 13

2.2. T h e o r i t i c a l Framework 1 5

2.2.1. Four Kinds o f Meaning 1 9 2.2.1.1. C o n c e p t u a l Meaning 20

2.2.1.2. P r o p o s i t i o n a l Meaning 2 0 2.2 .:I. 3. C o n t e x t u a l Meaning 2 0 2.2.1.4. P r a g m a t i c Meaning 22

2.2.2. Problem i n U n d e r s t a n d i n g

T e x t 24

2.2.2.1. The P r o b l e m o f S y n t a x 2 5 2.2.2.1.1. Complex Noun Group 2 6

2.2.2.1,.2. N o r n i n a l i z a t i o n 2 7

(7)

2.2.2.1.4. Subordination: Noun Clause

29

2.2.2.1.5. Farticipal and Proposi

-

tional Phrases 30

2.2.2.2. The Problem of Cohesive

Devices 3 1

2.2.2.2.1. Interpretting Reference

and Substitution 3 1 2.2.2.2.2. Interpretting Elliptical

Expression

3

3

2.2.2.2.3. Interpretting Lexical

Cohesion 33

2.2.2.3. Interpretting Discourse

Marker 34

2.2.2.3.1. Markers Signalling of'

Sequence of Events 35 2.2.2.3.2. Markers Signalling

Discourse Organizaticii 3

5

2.2.2.3.3. Markers Signalling

The Writer's Poinf of View

37

2.2.2.4. The EroblemBeyond The

Plain Sense 3 8

2.2.2.4.1. Recognizing Functional

Value 3

9

2.2.2.4.2. Recognizing The Presuppo- sition Underlying The Text 42 2.2.2.4.3. Recognizing Implications

and Making Inferences 4 3

CHAPTER

I11 METHODOLOGY OF RESEARCH 4 4

4 4 3.1. Population and Sample

3.2. The Research Instruments 4

5

3.3. Research Design 4

6

3.4. Procedures of Collecting .Data 4

7

3.4.1. Planning The Test 47 3.4.2. Preparing The Test Item

and Direction 5 3

3.4.3. Reviewing The Items

5

3 3.4.4, Pretesting The Material

54

3.4.5. Analyzing The Pretest
(8)

3.4.5.1. Item D i f f i c u l t y 5 5

3.4.5.2. I t e m D i s c r i m i n a t i o n 56

3.4.5.3. Extended I t e m A n a l y e i s

58

CHAPTER I Y DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION 7 4

4.1.

Data

A n a l y s i s 74

4.2. Data I n t e r p r e t a t i o n 7 9

CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION

5.1. C o n c l u s i o n

5.2. S u g g e s t i o n

BIBLIOGRAPHY 8 6

APPENDIX 88

(9)

TABLE LIST

Table 1

Table 2

T a b l e 3

Table 4

Table 6

Table

7

T a b l e 8

Table 10

Table 11

Table 12

Table 13

G r a m m a r T e s t Components

Reading Comprehension Components

T e s t A l l o t e d

The Component o f Reading Comprehension

C h e c k l i s t f o r The Design of F i n a l T e s t

The Component o f Reading Comprehension

Used A s A C h e c k l i s t f o r The Desing o f

F i n a l T e s t

5

2

Schedule o f P r e t e s t i n g The M a t e r i a l

5

4

The F a c i l i t y Value and The D i s c r i m i n a t i o n

Index o f Grammar T e s t 57

Tne F a c i l i t y Value and The D i s c r i m i n a t i o n

Index o f Reading Comprehension T e s t

5

8

The R e l i a b i l i t y C o e f f i c i e n t of t h e Grammar

and Reading Comprehansion T e s t 7 3

Data o f Grammar and Reading Comprehension

S c o r e s 7

5

Data To Find Out The C o e f f i c i e n t C o r r e l a t i o n

Between The G r a m m a r and The Reading

Comprehension S c o r e s

7

7

Table To Find Out The R e l i a b i l i t y C o e f f i c i e n t

of The Grammar T e s t 8 9

Table To Find Out The R e l i a b i l i t y C o e f f i c i e n t

(10)

T a b l e 1 4 T a b l e To F i a d Out The R e l i a b i l i t y C o e f f i c i e n t

of The Reading Comprehension S u b j e c t i v e

(11)

A C o r r e l a t i o n Between The Mastery o f E n g l i s h Complex

S e n t e n c e s and The Reading Comprehension Achievement o f

Second Semester Pharmacy S t u d e n t s of Widya Mandala

C a t h o l i c U n i v e r s i t y 1987/1988

Case Study

ABSTRACT

Nowadays t h e a b i l i t y t o understand E h g l i s h t e x t - books becomes a n e s s e n t i a l requirement of u n i v e r s i t y s t u d e n t s . Most j o u r n a l s , text- books o r r e f e r e n c e s a r e u s u a l l y w r i t t e n i n E n g l i s h . They a l l a r e t h e source o f i n f o r m a t i o n t o a t t a i n knowledge which r e l a t e s t o t h e s t u d e n t s ' s u b j e c t o f l e a r n i n g . A s a m a t t e r o f f a c t , however, t h e w r i t e r s t i l l f i n d s t h a t many Non-English Department s t u d e n t s e s p e c i a l l y i n Widya Mandala C a t h o l i c U n i v e r s i t y Surabaya e x p e r i e n c e some problems i n compre- hending t h e i r E n g l i s h text- books o r o t h e r r e f e r e n c e s .

T h i s t h i n k i n g i s a l s o supported by o t h e r p r e v i o u s g r a d u a t e s and t e a c h e r who claim t h a t s t u d e n t s o f Non-English

Department f a i l t o a c h i e v e t h e o b j e c t i v e of t e a c h i n g E n g l i s h t o Non-English Department..Looking a t t h e g a p between t h e o b j e c t i v e and t h e , r e s u l t , t h e w r i t e r wants t o make a r e s e a r c h ' concerning w i t h r e a d i n g comprehension

problem. According t o Arunee W i r i y a c h i t r a , reading>.problem i s caused by t h e complexity of s e n t e n c e s found i n t h e

r e a d i n g t e x t . T h i s view i n s p i r e s t h e . w r i t e r t o prove whether s t u d e n t s l . m a s t e r y o f EQglish Complex S e n t e n c e s found i n t h e r e a d i n g t e x t i n f l u e n c e s t h e i r r e a d i n g compre- h e n s i o n achievement.

From t h e r e s u l t o f t h i s s t u d y , t h e writer d o e s hope t h a t t h i s t h e s i s nlay c o n t r i b u t e some i n p u t s f o r t h e Non-English Department l e c t u r e s

i n

Widya Mandala O n i v e s s i t y Surabaya, e s p e c i a l l y t o Pharmacy lectures, i n terms o f how t o d e v e l o p s t u d e n t s1 r e a d i n g comprehension s k i l l s i n

a t t a i n i n g some E n g l i s h text- books.

I n o r d e r t o g e t a n o b j e c t i v e r e s u l t , t h e w r i t e r

(12)

C o - e f f i c i e n t C o r r e l a t i o n .

The p r e t e s t i n g i s a d m i n i s t e r e d t o t h e second s e m e s t e r Pharmacy s t u d e n t s Widya Mandala C a t h o l i c U n i v e r s i t y Surabaya 1987/1988 on J u l y 21, 1988 a t t h e Auditorium of Widya Mandala U n i v e r s i t y . The r e a l t e s t s a r e t a k e n t o t h e same s t u d e n t s on August 17, 1988 a t room B 202 Widya Mandala U n i v e r s i t y .

The s t a t i s t i c a l c a l c u l a t i o n of both s c o r e s shows t h a t t h e c o e f f i c i e n t c o r r e l a t i o n of both v a r i a b l e s i n

s i g n i f i c a n t l e v e l o f 95

%

i s below 0.602 ( t h e c o e f f i c i e n t o f t a b l e ). T h i s means t h a t t h e r e i s a s i g n i f i c a n t

r e l a t i o n s h i p between s t u d e n t s ' mastery of E n g l i s h Complex S e n t e n c e s and t h e i r Reading Comprehension Achievement. Furthermore, t h e f i n d i n g s a l s o inform t h a t t h e c o e f f i c i e n t d e t e r m i n a t i o n o f s t u d e n t s f E n g l i s h Complex S e n t e n c e s

towards t h e i r r e a d i n g comprehension achievement i s

34

%

.

T h i s p r o s e n t a g e l e a d s u s t o t h e c o n c l u s i o n t h a t t h e o t h e r

66

%

i s i n f l u e n c e d by o t h e r f a c t o r s .

Looking a t t h i s p r o s e n t a g e , t h e w r i t e r makes a

c o n c l u s i o n t h a t Non-English Department s t u d e n t s should be provided by some s k i l l s t o understand E n g l i s h Complex S e n t e n c e s a s w e l l as o t h e r problems l i k e problem of

c o h e s i v e d e v i c e , problem o f d i s c o u r s e markers o r problem beyond t h e p l a i n sense. According t o C h r i s t i n e N u t t a l l a l l t h o s e problems can be overcome by making g u e s s i n g o r h y p o t h i z i 3 g . I n o r d e r t o do t h i s , s t u d e n t s should be completed by t h e . f o u r k i n d s of meanings f i r s t ; t h e y a r e c o n c e p t u a l , p r o p o s i t i o n a l , c o n t e x t u a l and pragmatic

meaning. Having provided w i t h such knowledge, t h e s t u d e n t s now a r e r e a d y t o do t h e paragraph o r d i s c o u r s e a n a l y s i s .

Gambar

Table 14

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Sehingga penelitian ini telah dapat memberikan usulan model buffer pada komoditas bawang merah di Indonesia sekaligus memberikan mekanisme untuk menentukan harga setiap

individual, yang meliputi produktivitas, efisiensi, dan efektivitas kinerja.[12] Indikator yang digunakan untuk menjelaskan individual impact dalam model DeLone &amp;

Hasil pengujian secara in vivo selama 15 hari menunjukkan bahwa krim minyak jintan hitam memiliki potensi aktivitas antijerawat terhadap Propionibacterium acnes

Dalam novel Jejak Kala ini tahap penyelesaian terjadi saat tokoh utama telah mengalami berbagai macam kesedihan dan kepedihan karena kehilangan berturut-turut orang-orang

LO.h: Calculate and interpret the value at expiration, profit, maximum profit, maximum loss, and breakeven underlying price at expiration of the following option strategies: bull

Visi SFS: Tarekat Suster-suster Fransiskan Sukabumi adalah suatu persaudaraan yang terdiri atas pribadi yang terdorong oleh ilham ilahi mau.. Manusia mempunyai pikiran yang

handuk bersih diatas perut ibu untuk mengeringkan bayi. 15) Meletakan kain yang bersih di lipat 1/3 bagian, di bawah bokong ibu. 16) Membuka partus set. 17) Memakai sarung tangan

Menurut Sanjaya (2006:145) keberhasilan implementasi strategi tergantung pada cara guru menggunakan metode pembelajaran, karena suatu strategi pembelajaran hanya