REALIZATION OF THE POLITENESS STRATEGIES OF DIRECTIVE UTTERANCES BY THE STUDENTS OF ENGLISH DEPARTMENT AT THE FOURTH SEMESTER MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF
SURAKARTA
RESEARCH PAPER
Submitted as a Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Getting Bachelor Degree of Education
in English Department
by:
ARIF INDRA PURNOMO A320120159
ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTEMENT
SCHOOL OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA
v MOTTO
DEDICATION
This research paper is specially dedicated to: My beloved father
( H. PoernomoS.Pd ) My beloved mother ( H. Sri JuminiB.a ) My handsome brother
vii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
In the name of Allah, the most powerful and merciful, His blessing can never be
calculated or measured, so that the researcher can finish this research paper entitled
“REALIZATION OF THE POLITENESS STRATEGIES OF DIRECTIVE UTTERANCES BY THE STUDENTS OF ENGLISH DEPARTMENT AT THE FOURTH SEMESTER MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA” this research paper is one of requirement to finish studying in English Department of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta.
This research paper cannot be finished without many helps and supporting from
several people. Therefore, the researcher would like to express big thanks to:
1.Prof. Dr. H. BambangSetiaji, the Rector of MuhammadiyahUnversity of
Surakarta.
2.Prof. Dr. HarunJokoPrayitno, the Dean of MuhammadiyahUnversity of
Surakarta.
3.MaulyHalwatHikmar, Ph.D. the Head of English Department of
MuhammadiyahUnversity of Surakarta.
4.Dra. SitiZuhriahAriatmi, M.Hum, as the consultant, who has given her time to
guide, advice, and share much knowledge to the researcher until this researcher
paper is finished.
5.All lecturers in English Department of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta
for all the beneficial knowledge that has received by the researcher.
6.His beloved family, his beloved father and mother who always give advice,
support, attention, and motivation for his life.
7.His handsome brothers, thanks for your support at any time.
9.His beloved friend from the beginning semester Suci, Rizal, Dian Histori,
Ridwan, Kartika.
10.His awesomeness friends in THE FOSICKER ( Andre, Dina, Ayu, Lilies,
Novia, Andin, Davita, Dicky, Dwi, Henny, Iid, Intan, Sely, Mia, Panggah,
Farah, Richo, Riski, Putri, SitiNur, Silvi, Tama, Tiara, Titis Tiara Rind, Tri,
Wildan, Vindy, Yulia, Mitha, Suci, Rizhal, Dian, KartikaRidwan) thanks.
11.His all awesome DEE friends. Thank you.
12.EDSO 2015, for the beautiful experience.
13.First Division member Fathoni, Marta, Tafsir, eko, Elya, Gendis, Masriah,
Andan, Mila,
14.Iid Boarding House, thanks for share a place for sleep.
15.Rifki and Hemix as the PerpustakaanJurusan staff, thanks for the place.
16.His photography friends who always give new spirit.
17.The Clash of Clans leader and member, thanks for the excited battle.
18.All of staff who helps the researcher in processing the administration.
19.Everybody who has helped the researcher in this process that cannot be
mentioned on by one.
Thanks for all suggestion, help, support, enlightenment, other experience that are
given. The writher hopes that this research will bring the beneficial for everyone.
Surakarta, 1 Agustus 2016 The Writer
ix SUMMARY
ARIF INDRA PURNOMO / A320120159. REALIZATION OF THE POLITENESS STRATEGIES OF DIRECTIVE UTTERANCES BY THE STUDENTS OF ENGLISH DEPARTMENT AT THE FOURTH SEMESTER AT MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA. Research paper. School of Teacher Training and Education Faculty, Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta. Agustus, 2016
This descriptive qualitative research aims at describing (1) syntactical form of directive utterances, (2) the realization of politeness strategy (3) the relationship of directive utterance with politeness strategies. The data used in this research are utterances which are used by the students. The technique of collecting data used DCT model. The techniques of analyzing data are data reduction, analysis, and conclusion. The data are analyzed by using politeness theory (Brown and Levinson, 1987), grouping the sentences uses theory from (Frank, 1972) and politeness degree uses theory from (Leech, 1999).
The result indicated that: there are 4 types’ linguistic forms at directive utterances. (1) In request strategy the researcher found 3 linguistic forms namely: interrogative sentence takes 64%, imperative sentence takes 19%, and declarative sentence takes 17%. In order strategy the researcher found 4 linguistic forms namely: interrogative sentence takes 48%, imperative sentence takes 37%, and declarative sentence takes 13% and exclamatory sentence 2% (2) there are five politeness strategies. In request strategy the researcher found 4 politeness strategies namely: bald on record 18%, positive politeness 17%, negative politeness 62%, and off record 2%. In order strategy the researcher found 3 linguistic forms namely: bald on record 28%, positive politeness 12%, and negative politeness 59%. (3) The relationship of syntactical form directive utterance with politeness strategy, interrogative sentence have relationship with negative politeness, imperative sentence have relationship with positive politeness and bald on record, declarative sentence have relationship with off record, and exclamatory sentence have relationship with do not do FT.
RINGKASAN
ARIF INDRA PURNOMO / A320120159. REALIZATION OF THE POLITENESS STRATEGIES OF DIRECTIVE UTTERANCES BY THE STUDENTS OF ENGLISH DEPARTMENT AT THE FOURT SEMESTER AT MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA. Skripsi. Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. Agustus 2016.
Penelitian ini adalah penelitian yang bertujua nuntuk mengetahui penggunaan kesantunan dalam berbahasa. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian diskriptif kualitatif yang bertujuan untuk: (1) mendiskripsikan bentuk kalimat direktif, (2) mendiskripsikan penggunaan teorik esantunan (3) mendiskripsikan hubungan kalimat direktif dengan teori kesantunan. Data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini ialahk alimat – kalimat direktif yang digunakan oleh siswa. Tehnik pengumupulan data dalam penelitian ini menggunakan tehnik DCT. Tehnik analisis data meliputi reduksi data, menganalisa, dan kesimpulan. Data-data tersebut di analisis menggunkan teori kesantunan (Brown and Levinsson, 1987), pengelompokan kalimat menggunakan teori dari (Frank, 1972), dan tingkatan kalimat menggunakan teori dari (Leech, 1999).
Hasil dari penelitian menunjukan: (1) ada empat tipe kalimat berdasar fungsinya, dalam cara meminta kalimattanya (64%), kalimat perintah (19%), kalmiat deklaratif (17%), dalam cara member perintah kalimat tanya (48%), kalimat perintah (37%), kalimat deklaratif (13%) dan kalimat seruan (2%). (2) ada empat teori kesantunan dalam cara meminta, yaitu bald on record (18%), kesantunan positif (17%), kesantunan negatif (62%), off record (2%), dalam member perintah ada 3 dan bald on record (28%), kesantunan positif (12%), kesantunan negatif (59%). (3) hubungan kalimat directive dengan kesantunan yaitu, kalimat tanya memiliki hubungan dengan kesantunan negative, kalimat perintah memiliki hubungan dengan kesantunan positif dan bald on record, kalimat deklaratif memiliki hubungan dengan off record, dan kaliamat seruan memiliki hubungan dengan do not do FT.
xi
TABLE OF CONTENT
TITLE ... i
TESTIMONY ... ii
APPROVAL ... iii
ACCEPTANCE ... iv
MOTTO ... v
DEDICATION ... vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ... vii
ABSTRACK ... ix
ABSTRACK ... x
TABLE OF CONTENT ... xi
LIST OF TABLE ... xiv
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ... xv
LIST OF APPENDICES ... xvi
CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION A. Research context ……… 1
B. Limitation of the Study ………... 2
C.Focus of the study ……… 3
D.Objective of the Stud ………... 3
E.Benefit of the study………. 3
CHAPTER II: LITERATURE REVIEW A. THEORITICAL FRAMEWORK ... 5
a. Pragmatic Competence……….. 5
b. Principle of Pragmatic……….….. 6
2. Interlanguage Pragmatics……… 7
3. Speech act ………..……… 9
a. Classification of Speech act………. 9
b. Directive ... 10
c. Politeness……….………… 12
B. Previous Study………. .. 21
CHAPTER III: RESEARCH METHOD A. Type of Research………. 31
B. Object of the Study………... 31
C. Data and Data Source……….. 31
D. Technique of Collecting Data……… 31
E. Technique of Analyzing Data……… 33
CHAPTER IV: RESEARCH FINDING AND DISCUSSION A. Research finding……… 34
1. The Syntactical Form of Directive Utterance… 34 2. Politeness in Directive Utterance ………. 64
B. Discussion……….. 90
1. Syntactical form……….. 90
2. The Realization of Politeness Strategies…….. 92
xiii
CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
A. Conclusion……….103
B. Suggestion……….105
BIBLIOGRAPHY……… ... 107
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
xv
LIST OF TABLE
TABLE
LIST OF APPENDICES
