• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Hubungan Pola Pertumbuhan Vertikal Wajah (Analisis Steiner) dengan Lebar Lengkung Rahang pada Pasien Usia Dewasa di Klinik Ortodonti FKG USU

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Hubungan Pola Pertumbuhan Vertikal Wajah (Analisis Steiner) dengan Lebar Lengkung Rahang pada Pasien Usia Dewasa di Klinik Ortodonti FKG USU"

Copied!
4
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

1. Proffit RW, Fields WH, Sarver MD. Contemporary orthodontics. 4th

2. Singh G. Textbook of orthodontics. 2

ed. Philadelphia: 3-6

nd

3. Angle EH. Treatment of malocclusion of the teeth and fractures of the maxilla Angle’s system. 6

ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd ,2007: 53-6,77-8,163-7

th

4. Nanda RS and Ghosh J. 1995. Facialsoft tissue harmony and growth in orthodontic treatment. Semin Orthod 1995 June;1(2):67-81.

ed. Philadelphia: S. S. White Dental Mfg. Co. ,1900: 18-19

5. Schudy FF. Vertical growth versus anteroposterior growth as related to function and treatment. Angle Orthod 1964; 34 : 75 – 93.

6. Bishara SE. Textbook of orthodontics. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company ,2001: 104,131-2.

7. Enlow D, Hans MG. Essentials of facial growth. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company,1996: 166-7, 169-72

8. Forster CM, Sunga E, Chung CH. Relationship between dental arch width and vertical facial morphology in untreated adults. Eur J Orthod 2008; 30 : 288-94.

9. Rahardjo P. Diagnosis ortodontik. Surabaya: W.B. Airlangga University Press, 2008: 53-68

10.Rahardjo P. Ortodonti dasar. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press, 2009: 60-79. 11.Schudy FF. The rotation of mandible resulting from growth : its implications in

orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 1965; 35 : 36 – 50.

(2)

12.Wagner DC, Chung CH. Transverse growth of the maxilla and mandible in untreated girl with low, average, and high MP-SN angles : a longitudinal study. Am

J Orthod Dentofac 2005; 128 : 716 – 23.

13.Issacson JR, Speidel TM, Worms FW. Extreme variation in vertical facial growth and associated variation in skeletal and dental relations. Angle Orthod 1971; 41 :

219-29.

14.Nasby JA, Isaacson RJ, Worms FW, Speidel TM. Orthodontic extractions and facial skeletal pattern. Angle Orthodontist 1972; 42 : 116 – 22.

15.Flores Mir C, Major PW. Self-perceived orthodontic treatment need evaluated through 3 scales in a university population. J Orthod. 2004; 31: 329-334.

16.Mahyastuti RD, Christnawati. Perbandingan posisi bibir dan dagu antara laki-laki dan perempuan Jawa berdasarkan analisis profil muka menurut Bass. MIKG 2008;

23 (1): 1-7.

17.Langlois JH, Kalakanis L, Rubenstein AJ, Larson A, Hallam M, Smoot M. Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychol Bull 2000;

126: 3: 390-423

18.Camara CA. Aesthetics in orthodontics : six horizontal smile lines. Dent Press J Orthod. 2010; 15(1): 118-131.

19.Samorodnitzky-Naveh G, Geiger SB, Levin L. Patients’ satisfaction with dental esthetics. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007; 138: 805-8.

20.Soh J. Chew MT, Chan YH. Perceptions of dental esthetics of Asian ortodontist and laypearsons. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 130: 170-6.

21.Bhalajhi SI. Orthodontics : The art and science. 1st

22.Rakosi, Jonas I, Graber TM. Orthodontics diagnosis. New York: Thieme Medical Publisher Inc., 1993: 110-13, 173-203, 207-10, 228-30.

ed. New Delhi: Arya publishing house, 1998: 1-15,76-7, 145-60

23.Jacobson A. Radiographic cephalometry : From Basics to Videoimaging. Birmingham: Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc, 1995: 39, 40, 44, 68-9, 77-80.

(3)

24.Athanasiou AE. Orthodontic cephalometry. London: Mosby-Wolfe, 1995: 21, 36, 50-51.

25.Susanto FA. Analisa hubungan kranio-dento-fasial kelompok etnik Proto Melayu usia 12-19 tahun di Medan pada tahun 1989 secara sefalometri radiografi. Majalah

Ortodonti Indonesia 1993; 4: 58-78

26.Rakosi T. An atlas and manual of cephalometric radiography. London: Wolfe Medical Publications Ltd, 1982: 7-8, 34-45, 65, 78-89.

27.Salzmann JA. Practice of orthodontics. London: Lippincott company, 1966: 480-517

28.Kurame M, Magnani MBBA, Boeck EM, Lucato AS. Jabarak,s cephalometric analysis of brazilian black patients. Braz Dent J 2007; 18(3): 258-62

29.Moyers RE. Handbook of orthodontics. 4th

30.Jacobson A. Radiographic cephalometry from Basics to 3-D Imaging. 2

Edition. London: Year Book Medical Publisher. Inc, 1998: 247-63

nd

31.Foster TD. Buku Ajar ortodonsi. Jakarta: EGC; 1993: 78-97

Edition. Alabama: Quintessence Publishing Co, 2006: 45-135

32.Bishara SE. Textbook of orthodontics. Toronto: W.B. Saunders Company, 2001: 113-7, 131-2.

33.Rostina T. Analisa jaringan lunak menurut metode holdaway pada mahasiswa FKG USU suku deutro-melayu. Tesis: Medan: USU, 2009: 2-18.

34.Febrina RS, Soemantri ESS, Mardiati E. Ukuran dan bentuk lengkung gigi rahang bawah pada mahasiswa Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi UNPAD. Jurnal Kedoketeran

Gigi 1997; 9 (1): 22-7.

35.Raberin M, Laumon B, Martin JL, Brunner F. Dimension and form of dental arches in with normal occlusions. Am J Orthod Dentofac 1993; 104 : 67-72.

36.Phan X, Antoniazzi A, Short L. Palatal expansion in mixed dentition versus early permanent dentition. Virtual Journal of Orthodontics 2007; 7(3) : 1-9

37.Mills LF. Changes in dimension of the dental arches with age. J Dent Res 1996; 45(3) : 890-4

(4)

38.Poosti M, Jalali T. Tooth size and arch dimension in uncrowded versus crowded class I malocclusion. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007; 8(3) : 1-8.

39.Cobourne TM, DiBiase TA. Handbook of Orthodontics. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier, 2010: 61-6, 71-2.

40.Chen F. Dental arch width and mandibular-maxillary base width in class III malocclusion with low, average and high MP-SN angles. Angle Orthodontist 2007;

77(1) : 36-41.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

a) Dihitung rerata dan standard deviasi sudut MP-SN dan tinggi dentoalveolar regio molar. b) Dihitung rerata dan standard deviasi lebar lengkung gigi rahang atas dan rahang

Pemeriksaan radiografi extra-oral seperti sefalometri dan panoramik sering digunakan untuk mengevaluasi asimetri skeletal dan jaringan lunak pada wajah karena dengan foto

Judul Tesis : Hubungan Pola Morfologi Vertikal Skeletal Wajah pada Maloklusi Klas I, II dan III dengan Ketebalan Simfisis Mandibula di Klinik PPDGS Ortodonti RSGMP FKG USU..

Untuk mengetahui perbedaan dan hubungan pola morfologi vertikal skeletal wajah pada maloklusi Klas I, II dan III dengan ketebalan simfisis mandibula dilakukan uji Kruskal Wallis

Untuk mengetahui perbedaan pola morfologi vertikal skeletal wajah pada tiap-tiap. maloklusi Klas I, II dan III dengan ketebalan

Pemeriksaan radiografi extra-oral seperti sefalometri dan panoramik sering digunakan untuk mengevaluasi asimetri skeletal dan jaringan lunak pada wajah karena dengan

Stability of changes in dental arch dimension with orthodontic treatment: a comparative study between extraction and non-extraction cases.. Paramesthi GAMDH, Farmasyanti CA,

Analisis konveksitas wajah secara lateral pada analisis fotografi menggunakan dua garis penuntun, yaitu garis yang menghubungkan antara dahi dan batas terluar bibir atas